NANO EXPRESS Open Access Micro-spectroscopy on silicon wafers and solar cells Paul Gundel * , Martin C Schubert, Friedemann D Heinz, Robert Woehl, Jan Benick, Johannes A Giesecke, Dominik Suwito, Wilhelm Warta Abstract Micro-Raman (μRS) and micro-photoluminescence spectrosc opy (μPLS) are demonstrated as valuable characterization techniques for fundamental research on silicon as well as for technological issues in the photovoltaic production. We measure the quantitative carrier recombination lifetime and the doping density with submicron resolution by μPLS and μRS. μPLS utilizes the carrier diffusion from a point excitation source and μRS the hole density-dependent Fano resonances of the first order Raman peak. This is demonstrated on micro defects in multicrystalline silicon. In comparison with the stress measurement by μRS, these measurements reveal the influence of stress on the recombination activity of metal precipitates. This can be attributed to the strong stress dependence of the carrier mobility (piezoresistance) of silicon. With the aim of evaluating technological process steps, Fano resonances in μRS measurements are analyzed for the determination of the doping density and the carrier lifetime in selective emitters, laser fired doping structures, and back surface fields, while μPLS can show the micron-sized damage induced by the respective processes. Introduction Silicon solar cells contribute by far the largest share to the world ’ s photovoltaic facilities [1]. An important prop- erty to classify these silicon solar cells is the base mate- rial, where two fundamentally different approaches can be observed in the photovoltaic industry: multicrystalline and monocrystalline cells. While the fabrication o f monocrystalline silicon is more expensive, the efficiency potential of these cells is higher. The world record effi- ciency for monocrystalline silicon solar cells is 25.0% [2] and 20.4% for multicrystalline silicon [3]. As different as these base materials are as different as the arising chal- lenges in the i ndustrial production: To realize the effi- ciency potential and to lower the price per Watt-peak of monocrystalline cells, sophisticated cell structures with doping microstructures including selective emitters, laser fired back surface fields [4], and backside contacts have been introduced and are partly already adopted in the industrial production. For multicrystalline silicon, the photovoltaic industry tries either to use less pure and cheaper silicon (“ upgraded metallurgical grade silicon”) and to improve this material during the solar cell process by high temperature and gettering steps, to reduce the costs, or to use multicrystalline material with low defect densities to increase the efficiency potential. From these strategies, two important fields of microscopic research emerge: the detailed characterization and improvement of doping microstructures and the research on microde- fects, which limit the performance of multicrystalline cells. Both fields require the development and application of electrical characterization techniques which provide a high spatial resolution of at least 1 μm. In this pape r, we dem onstrate the latest advances on these research fields, which are based on micro-Raman spectroscopy (μRS) and micro-photoluminescence spec- troscopy (μPLS). First, we will introduce the measure- ment techniques and how the important parameters doping density, carrier lifetime and mechanical stress can be extracted from both techniques with a spatial resolution of down to 500 nm. In the second part, we will apply these techniques (1) for the characterization of technological doping microstructures and (2) for the fundamental research on the recombination activity of precipitates. Experimental setup and samples μRS and μPLS are based on the same scanning confocal microscope, which features a 532 nm laser as point excita- tion source, a ×50 lens with a numerical ap erture of 0.65 for μPLS and a ×100 lens with a numerical aperture of 0.9 for highly resolved μRS measurements. The spotsize of the * Correspondence: paul.gundel@ise.fraunhofer.de Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (ISE), Heidenhofstr. 2, 79110 Freiburg, Germany Gundel et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, 6:197 http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/197 © 2011 Gundel et al; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. laser is less than 500 nm in diameter and the power on the sample can be varied between 0 and 27 mW. Details on the setup can be found in [5,6]. The sample surfaces for the multicrystalline samples and the cross-sections of the back surface field (BSF) and the laser-processed BSF were polished mechanically. No surface passivation has been applied to all samples. The multicrystalline wafer is 1.5 × 10 16 cm -3 boron doped and was intentionally contaminated with nickel. Quantitative Raman and photolumin escence spectroscopy In this section, the techniques to quantitatively deter- mine the doping density, the Shockley-Read-Hall life- time, and the residual stress with micron resolution are presented in the two following subsections. The Shockley- Read-Hall lifetime is highly correlated to the efficiency of multicrystalline silicon solar cells. Micro-photoluminescence spectroscopy The requirement for the high resolution of about 1 μm of all of the discussed techniques is to measure under high injection conditions, since the carrier diffusion length has to be in the order of the spatial resolution or lower. This is typically the ca se only u nder high injec- tion conditions, where Auger recombination limits the diffusion length to 1 μm or less. The physical principle behi nd the quantitative determination of doping density and Shockley-Read-Hall lifetime by μPLS is to measure the depth profile of the injection density and to compare the measurement with simulations. The depth profile is measured by varying the pinhole size of the confocal microscope, which allows to measure with different spa- tial detection profiles. We execute two measurements with a pin hole size of 100 and 1,000 μm, respectively. The detection profiles of both pinhole sizes are experi- mentally determined by scanning a pre-breakdown site with a diameter of less than 550 nm (Figure 1). By dividing the PL intensity around the center of the band-to-band PL peak I 1 (large pinhole) by the PL intensity I 2 (small pinhole), we obtain information about the depth profile. Using the ratio of two measurements has the advantage that un known parameters such as the absolute quantum ef ficiency of the detector system and the emissivity of the sample surface cancel out. The measured ratio Q=I 1 /I 2 is compared to numerical two dimensional simulations of the injection density and the resulting Q. We call these techn iques micro-photolumi - nescence lifetime mapping [7] and micro-doping density mapping [8]. By this comparison, the Shockley-Read-Hall lifetime and the doping density can be extracted. An example for the simulated injection density in the sample and a graphic representation of a part of the calibration table for the lifetime are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Furthermore, μPLS can be utilized to measure the bandgap energy. Since the bandgap energy depends on the residual stress [9,10] and the doping density, these parameters can be e xtracted from the μPLS measure- ment. For this the PL spectrum at 300 K is empirically fitted with three overlapping Gaussians with fixed rela- tive spectral distance s and the relative peak shift is extracted. From the relative peak shift, the stress level can be calculated if the doping density is homogeneous (variations below 10 17 cm -3 , where the influence on the bandgap energy becomes significant). In [6], we could show that the measured stress is in agreement with μRS stress measurements. If no stress is present, the doping density can be estimated. Micro-Raman spectroscopy The measuremen t of stress by μRS is well known and is not discussed here . In [11 ,12], excellent descriptions of this technique can be found. We are focusing here on the determination of the doping density and the Shock- ley-Read-Hall lifetime. Becker et al. [13] d emonstrated the doping density measurement with μRS. This techni- que is based on the Fano resonance between the Raman active optical phonons and the free holes [14]. Accord- ing t o Fano, the shape of the first order Raman peak in wavenumbers Ω is: I peak peak Ω= +Ω−Ω ⎡ ⎣ ⎤ ⎦ +Ω−Ω ⎡ ⎣ ⎤ ⎦ − − q 2 12 1 2 1 2 () () Γ Γ (1) with the Fano asymmetry parameter q and the line width Γ. Γ and q -1 incr ease monotonicall y with the hole density [15] and thus, can be used to measure the hole density. To calibrate both parameters with the hole den- sity, we measured the Raman spectra of samples with known doping densities at 0.7 mW laser power on the sample and fitted the first order Raman peak with equa- tion 1. From the fits, we can extract the hole density dependence of q and Γ (Figure 4). In samples wit h unknown dop ing densities, the cali- bration curves are used to determine the doping density. Since Γ is more robust against fitting errors than q,we rely on this parameter for the measurements below. At high injection, the Fano resonance is not solely governed by the doping density but also by the injected holes. With simulat ions in analogy to [7,8] and the cali- bration tables in Figure 4, the Shockley-Read-Hall life- time can be measured at injection densities above 10 18 cm -3 . An excellent agreement between μPLS and μRS Fano measurements was demonstrated in [16]. Gundel et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, 6:197 http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/197 Page 2 of 8 The advantage of μRS compared to μPLS is the higher spatial resolution of 500 nm or less. μPLS offers the advantages to measure not only p-type doping but also n-type doping and the measurements are typically less noisy. Furthermore μPLS has the ability to measure the defect luminescence within the same measurement. Aluminum back surface field The SRH lifetime measurement along a line scan through the BSF (p + -layer) of a monocrystalline silicon solar cell is exemplified here. The doping density profile was measured with electrochemical capacitance voltage and is taken into account in the simulation for the life- time determination. The lifetime within the BSF is cru- cial for the solar cell performance. An average value was determined to be 120 ns by Schmidt et al. [17]. For our spatially resolved measurements, we use μRS on a cross section of the BSF. The measured hole density in the BSF at a laser power of 27 mW is depicted in Figure 5a. Figure 5b shows the effective Shockley-Read-Hall life- time along a linescan. Lifetime values greater than 200 ns mean that the life time is solel y limited by Auger recombination under the measurement conditions. At the interfaces between BSF and aluminum contact and BSF and silicon bulk we detected low SRH lifetimes. While this may be caused by the high surface recombi- nation at the aluminum contact, the nature at the sec- ond interface is less clear. Therefore, we investigated this area with μPLS and showed an increased defect luminescence at 1,250 nm in this area (Figur e 6), which is an indication for a higher defect density in this a rea, which could cause the drop in lifetime. Defect lumines- cence at 1,250 nm was observed in previous experiments on multicrystalline silicon at recombination active Figure 1 Ex perimentally determined spatial detection profiles. Experimentally determined spatial detection profiles with the big and the small pinhole corrected for the refractive index outside and inside of the sample. The n values refer to the refractive index in silicon and air. Figure 2 Example for the simulated injection density. The injection density drops sharply within a few microns from the point of excitations. Gundel et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, 6:197 http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/197 Page 3 of 8 defects [6]. A more detailed analysis of the BSF can be found in [18]. Laser doping from a dopant containing passivation layer (PassDop) In this section, we qualitatively analyze the cross section of a laser-induced BSF. Local highly doped regions are prepared by point wise laser irradiation of a silicon sur- face which was previously coated by a phosphorous con- taining passivation layer [4]. By laser irradiation, the dopant source and the underlying silicon is molten and a phosphorous diffusion in the liquid volume takes place resulting in a local, highly n-doped re gion. This high doping density underneath the subsequently evapo- rated metal contacts effectively suppresses recombina- tion at the contact points and fur thermor e results in a low contact resistance. The high doping is visible by a shift of the PL peak to higher wavelengths (Figure 7a). The PL shift is caused by the decrease of the bandgap at higher doping densities. In Figure 7b, the micron-sized Figure 3 Graphic representation of calibration table. Graphic representation of a part of the calibration table for a 1.5 × 10 16 -cm -3 p-doped sample with different surface recombination velocities. From the ratio Q, which is monotonically increasing with the Shockley-Read-Hall lifetime τ SRH , we can directly determine τ SRH . In analogy to this calibration table, a table for the determination of the doping density can be plotted. Figure 4 Hole density dependence of q and Γ. (a) Hole density (doping density) against 1,000 × q -1 ·q -1 is proportional to the h ole density. The doping element (aluminum and boron) has no significant effect on the calibration. (b) Hole density (doping density) against line width Γ. The fit shows a quadratic dependence of Γ on the hole density. Gundel et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, 6:197 http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/197 Page 4 of 8 damage, which is caused by the laser process, can be seen at the edges of the laser processed area (white arrows) by a qualitative μPLS image map. This damage at the edges could be caused by the strong thermal gra- dient in this region during the laser firing. Another rea- son for the visibility of the damage is that there is no Figure 5 Hole density and lifetime values in the BSF. The Raman-Fa no-m easured hole density in the BSF (p+-lay er) (a) and the resulting effective Shockley-Read-Hall lifetime at high injection (b). Lifetime values greater than 200 ns mean that the lifetime is solely limited by Auger recombination. Figure 6 Intensity o f the defect luminescence at 1,250 nm in the BSF. The intensity is clearly increased at the right side of the BSF, which indicates a higher defect density here. This could cause the low lifetimes at the interface between BSF and silicon bulk. Figure 7 Doping density and carrier lifetime in PassDop sample. (a) Qualitative doping density, which is significantly increased in the laser-induced doping region (at the upper surface between the green lines) and (b) damage (map of the μPLS intensity) at the edges of the laser affected region which decreases the lifetime (white arrows). Gundel et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, 6:197 http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/197 Page 5 of 8 back surface field at the edges, which could passivate the damaged region. This shows the special care which has to be taken for the process laser profile in order to minimize the thermal stress in the edge regions. Multicrystalli ne silicon After demonstrating the applicability of μRS and μPLS on technological structures, we continue with measure- ments on defects in multicrystalline silicon. For this, a 1 ×1cm 2 wafer is measured with micro-photolumines- cence lifetime mapping. The PL intensity I 1 with the large diameter is compared in Figure 8a to a PL imaging measurement. PL imaging is used here only for compar- ison and is explained in [19]. The images show a good qualitative agreement, even though μPLS measures under high injection and PL imaging measures in the low injection regime. This is du e to the fact that high and low injection lifetimes are both proportional to the inverse defect density [20]. This h ighlights the useful- ness of μPLS for the characterization of solar cells, which are typically working under low injection co ndi- tions. These results are discussed in detail in [7]. Figure 8b shows the Shockley-Read-Hall lifetime on a 100 × 100 μm 2 area at the triple point of three grain boundaries, which was measured by micro-photolumi- nescence lifetime mapp ing. The measurement shows the strongly different recombination activities o f the three grain boundaries and reveals micron-sized denuded zones around the left grain boundary. The linescan across this grain boundary highlights the spatial resolu- tion of micro-photoluminescence lifetime mapping. Micron-sized denuded zones could not be detected prior to the applicati on of μPLS and μRS. The origin could be slowly diffusing impurities, which are internally gettered at the grai n boundary during the bl ock casting, which cleans the area around the grain boundary from these impurities. The lower right grain boundaries are highly recombination active, which is probably caused by a high metal decoration. Metal precipitates are also the most likely origin of the round structures along this grain boundary. Stress and recombination activity The influence of stress on the recombinatio n activity of metal precipitates is so far not known but often dis- cussed. In this section, we will show experimental evi- dence that tensile stress increases and compressive stress reduces the recombination activity. For this, we map the areas around nickel pre cipitates, which are close to the wafer surface with μRS and e xtract the stress and the hole density. From the hole density, we calculate the hole density contrast C RS in analogy to the well-known EBIC contrast as measure for the recombi- nation activity: C p p RS =−1 max , (2) with the maximum measured hole density p max and the hole density p. Figure 9 shows, that high compressive stress correlates with lower recombination activities along the lines of high compressive stress and that high tensile stres s cor- relates with higher recombination activities. This effect can be explain ed by the strong piezoresistance of silicon [21]: The carrier flux to the precipitate surface with its high surface recombination velocity [22,23] is propor- tional to the carrier mobility [24]. This change in mobi- lity increases/reduces the carrier flux for tensile/ compressive stress and hence, leads to a high/lower recombination activity in the respective directions. Another origin of the observed correlation between stress and recombination activity could be the formation of dislocations due to stress. However t his formation would relax the stress and thus lead to a reduction of the correlation between stress and recombination activ- ity. Details on the impact of stress on the recombination activity and a quantitative analysis can be found in [25,26]. Conclusions We presented an overview about the most recent devel- opments of micro-Raman (μRS) and micro-photolumi- nescence spectroscopy (μPLS) and their successful application on technological microstructures and o n fundamental problems of rec ombination at defects in silicon. We demonstrated the high resolution (< 1 μm) measurement of (1) the Shockley- Read-Hal l lifetime by μRS and μPLS, (2) of the doping density by μRS and μPLS, and (3) of stress with both methods. μRS has the advantage of a higher spatial resolution (about 0.5 μmcomparedto0.8μm) and is not influ- enced by defect luminescence, which can make the extraction of the bandgap energy and thus of the doping density and th e stress from PL measur ements difficult. μPLS has the advantages to be able to measure both n- and p-type doping and exhibits less noise in carrier life- time measurem ents for comparable measurement times. Furthermore, the analysis of the defect luminescence can give a deeper insight in the carrier lifetime limiting defects. We were able to detect high recombination activities within an aluminum-doped back surface field and the damage caused by a laser firing contact process, which shows ways to improve the processes. On multicrystalline silicon, we investigated the recom- bination activity of grain boundaries and were able to measure micron-sized denuded zones around a grain Gundel et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, 6:197 http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/197 Page 6 of 8 Figure 8 Measurements on multicrytalline silicon. (a) PL intensity I 1 (left side) in comparison to a PL imaging measured lifetime (right side) of the same wafer. Both measurements are in good qualitative agreement. An excerpt in the white square is further analyzed in (b) In both images denuded zones of 100-μm width with higher lifetimes are visible around the dark grain boundaries. (b) Micro-photoluminescence lifetime map of the quantitative Shockley-Read-Hall lifetime. The map shows three grain boundaries with distinctively different recombination properties. The upper right grain boundary is almost recombination inactive and hardly visible, whereas the grain boundary on the lower right side is highly recombination active, which can be attributed to a strong metal precipitate decoration. Figure 9 Hole density contrast and stress around a nickel precipit ate. The green lines mark the directions of high compressive (negative) stress, which tend to show a lower hole density contrast (recombination activity). In areas of high tensile (positive) stress, the hole density contrast is increased (higher recombination activity). Gundel et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, 6:197 http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/197 Page 7 of 8 boundary. We could explain the observed effect that recombination activity is significantly increased by ten- sile stress and reduced by compressive stress, by the high piezoresistivity of silicon. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge sample preparation by Aleksander Filipovic, Gisela Räuber, Miroslawa Kwiatkowska and Markus Hecht. This work was supported by internal funding of the Fraunhofer Society. Authors’ contributions PG designed the study, carried out the μRS and μPLS measurements, participated in the simulations, and drafted the manuscript. MCS supervised the experiments and simulations. FDS participated in the simulations and carried out the lifetime measurement at the triple point. RW prepared the back surface field samples and assisted in the back surface field data interpretation. JB prepared the samples for the calibration of the Fano resonance. JAG performed the quantitative PL imaging measurement. DS prepared the PassDop samples and participated in the interpretation of the results on these samples. WW supervised the project work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Received: 3 September 2010 Accepted: 4 March 2011 Published: 4 March 2011 References 1. Ananthachar V: Current and Next Generation Solar Cell Market Outlook. 2009, Proceedings of ISES World Congress (Vol. I - Vol. V): 2951. 2. Zhao J, Wang A, Green MA, Ferrazza F: Novel 19.8% efficient ‘honeycomb’ textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 1998, 73:1991-1993. 3. Schultz O, Glunz SW, Willeke GP: Multicrystalline silicon solar cells exceeding 20% efficiency. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2004, 12:553-558. 4. Suwito D, Jäger U, Benick J, Janz S, Hermle M, Glunz SW: Industrially Feasible Rear Passivation and Contacting Scheme for High-Efficiency n- Type Solar Cells Yielding Voc of 700 mV. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2010, 57:2032. 5. Gundel P, Schubert MC, Kwapil W, Schön J, Reiche M, Savin H, Yli-Koski M, Sans JA, Martinez-Criado G, Seifert W, Warta W, Weber ER: Micro- photoluminescence spectroscopy on metal precipitates in silicon. Physica Status Solidi Rapid Research Letters (RRL) 2009, 3:230. 6. Gundel P, Schubert MC, Warta W: Simultaneous stress and defect luminescence study on silicon. Physica Status Solidi A 2010, 207(2):436. 7. Gundel P, Heinz FD, Schubert MC, Giesecke JA, Warta W: Quantitative carrier lifetime measruement with micro resolution. J Appl Phys 2010, 108:033705. 8. Heinz FD, Gundel P, Schubert MC, Warta W: Mapping the doping concentration with micro resolution in silicon and solar cells. J Appl Phys 2010. 9. Paul W, Warschauer DM: Optical properties of semiconductors under hydrostatic pressure–II. Silicon. J Phys Chem Sol 1958, 5:89. 10. Balslev I: Influence of Uniaxial Stress on the Indirect Absorption Edge in Silicon and Germanium. Phys Rev 1966, 143:636. 11. Becker M, Scheel H, Christiansen S, Strunk HP: Grain orientation, texture, and internal stress optically evaluated by micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Appl Phys 2007, 101:063531. 12. De Wolf I: Micro-Raman spectroscopy to study local mechanical stress in silicon integrated circuits. Semicond Sci Technol 1996, 11:139. 13. Becker M, Gösele U, Hofmann A, Christiansen S: Highly p-doped regions in silicon solar cells quantitatively analyzed by small angle beveling and micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Appl Phys 2009, 106:074515. 14. Fano U: Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts. Phys Rev 1961, 124:1866. 15. Magidson V, Beserman R: Fano-type interference in the Raman spectrum of photoexcited Si. Phys Rev B 2002, 66:195206. 16. Gundel P, Schubert MC, Heinz FD, Benick J, Zizak I, Warta W: Submicron resolution carrier lifetime analysis in silicon with Fano resonances. Physica Status Solidi Rapid Research Letters (RRL) 2010, 4:160. 17. Schmidt J, Thiemann N, Bock R, Brendel R: Recombination lifetimes in highly aluminum-doped silicon. J Appl Phys 2009, 106:093707. 18. Woehl R, Gundel P, Krause J, Rühle K, Heinz FD, Rauer M, Schmiga C, Schubert MC, Warta W, Biro D: Evaluating the aluminum alloyed p+-layer of silicon solar cells by emitter saturation current density and optical micro-spectroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2011, 58(2):441. 19. Giesecke JA, Kasemann M, Warta W: Determination of local minority carrier diffusion lengths in crystalline silicon from luminescence images. J Appl Phys 2009, 106:014907. 20. Shockley W, Read WT Jr: Statistics of the Recombinations of Holes and Electrons. Phys Rev 1952, 87(5):835. 21. Smith CS: Piezoresistance Effect in Germanium and Silicon. Phys Rev 1953, 94:42. 22. Kittler M, Larz J, Seifert W, Seibt M, Schröter W: Recombination properties of structurally well defined NiSi2 precipitates in silicon. Appl Phys Lett 1991, 58:911. 23. Donolato C: The space-charge region around a metallic platelet in a semiconductor. Semicond Sci Technol 1993, 8:45. 24. Plekhanov PS, Tan TY: Schottky effect model of electrical activity of metallic precipitates in silicon. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76:3777. 25. Gundel P, Schubert MC, Heinz FD, Kwapil W, Warta W, Martinez-Criado G, Reiche M, Weber ER: Impact of stress on the recombination at metal precipitates in silicon. J Appl Phys 2010, 108:103707. 26. Gundel P, Schubert MC, Heinz FD, Warta W: Recombination enhancement by stress in silicon. Proceedings of 35th IEEE-PVSC, Honolulu, Hawaii; 2010. doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-197 Cite this article as: Gundel et al.: Micro-spectroscopy on silicon wafers and solar cells. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011 6:197. Submit your manuscript to a journal and benefi t from: 7 Convenient online submission 7 Rigorous peer review 7 Immediate publication on acceptance 7 Open access: articles freely available online 7 High visibility within the fi eld 7 Retaining the copyright to your article Submit your next manuscript at 7 springeropen.com Gundel et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, 6:197 http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/197 Page 8 of 8 . irradiation of a silicon sur- face which was previously coated by a phosphorous con- taining passivation layer [4]. By laser irradiation, the dopant source and the underlying silicon is molten and a. regions. Multicrystalli ne silicon After demonstrating the applicability of μRS and μPLS on technological structures, we continue with measure- ments on defects in multicrystalline silicon. For. doping concentration with micro resolution in silicon and solar cells. J Appl Phys 2010. 9. Paul W, Warschauer DM: Optical properties of semiconductors under hydrostatic pressure–II. Silicon. J