STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PHIL BRYANT State Auditor RAMONA HILL, CPA Director, Financial and Compliance Audit Division BRENT BALLARD, CPA Director, Education Audit Section_part4 ppt

27 SUNFLOWER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT REPORTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROL 28 SUNFLOWER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (This page left blank intentionally) 29 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PHIL BRYANT AUDITOR INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING BASED ON AN AUDIT OF THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS May 20, 1998 Superintendent and School Board Sunflower County School District We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the Sunflower County School District as of and for the year ended June 30, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated May 20, 1998. Our report differed from the standard report because of a scope limitation due to inadequate general fixed assets subsidiary records for the buildings and equipment classification. Except for the scope limitation referred to above, we conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the school district's general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests did not disclose any instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. However, we noted certain immaterial instances of noncompliance that we have reported to management of the school district in a separate letter dated May 20, 1998, which is included in this report. 30 Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the school district's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the general purpose financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. However, we noted certain matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control over financial reporting that, in our opinion, could adversely affect the school district's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the general purpose financial statements. The reportable conditions are described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs as items 97-1, 97-2 and 97-3. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the general purpose financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions and, accordingly, would not also disclose all reportable conditions that are also considered to be material weaknesses. However, of the reportable conditions described in the findings referred to above, we consider item 97-1 to be a material weakness. This report is intended for the information of the school board, management and federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. PHIL BRYANT RAMONA HILL, CPA State Auditor Director, Financial and Compliance Audit Division 31 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PHIL BRYANT AUDITOR INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 May 20, 1998 Superintendent and School Board Sunflower County School District Compliance We have audited the compliance of the Sunflower County School District with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that are applicable to its major federal program for the year ended June 30, 1997. The school district's major federal program is identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to its major federal program is the responsibility of the school district's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the school district's compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the school district's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination on the school district's compliance with those requirements. In our opinion, Sunflower County School District complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that are applicable to its major federal program for the year ended June 30, 1997. 32 Internal Control Over Compliance The management of the Sunflower County School District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the school district's internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Our consideration of the internal control over compliance would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that noncompliance with applicable requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants that would be material in relation to a major federal program being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We did not note any matters involving internal control over compliance and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. This report is intended for the information of the school board, management and federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. PHIL BRYANT RAMONA HILL, CPA State Auditor Director, Financial and Compliance Audit Division 33 SUNFLOWER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT INDEPENDENT AUDITOR=S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS 34 SUNFLOWER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (This page left blank intentionally) 35 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PHIL BRYANT AUDITOR INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS May 20, 1998 Superintendent and School Board Sunflower County School District We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the Sunflower County School District as of and for the year ended June 30, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated May 20, 1998. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Our report differed from the standard report because of a scope limitation due to inadequate general fixed assets subsidiary records for the buildings and equipment classification. As required by the state legal compliance audit program prescribed by the Office of the State Auditor, we have also performed procedures to test compliance with certain state laws and regulations. However, providing an opinion on compliance with state laws and regulations was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of those procedures and our audit of the general purpose financial statements disclosed the instance of noncompliance described in finding 97-2 in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs and the following immaterial instances of noncompliance with state laws and regulations. Our immaterial findings and recommendations and your responses are as follows: 1. Finding The superintendent, acting as a purchase agent for the district, was not bonded separately in the capacity of a purchase agent. Recommendation We recommend that the district comply with Section 37-39-21, Miss. Code Ann. (1972), which requires any official, acting as a purchase agent for the district, to be bonded separately in the amount of $50,000. Additionally, the bond must be filed and recorded in the office of the Chancery Clerk. School District’s Response Application for an additional bond of $50,000 for the superintendent has been made and should be completed by August 31, 1998. 36 2. Finding The school district treated an employee as a third party vendor when it contracted with the special education director to perform testing services for the district. Recommendation We recommend that the district comply with Section 37-11-27, Miss. Code Ann. (1972), which prohibits school employees from having a direct interest in contracts with the school district. School District’s Response Any additional services that employees perform, in the future, will be treated as a payroll function. The Office of the State Auditor or a public accounting firm will review, on the subsequent year's audit engagement, the findings in this report to insure that corrective action has been taken. This report is intended for the information of the school board and management. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. PHIL BRYANT RAMONA HILL, CPA State Auditor Director, Financial and Compliance Audit Division . HILL, CPA State Auditor Director, Financial and Compliance Audit Division 31 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PHIL BRYANT AUDITOR INDEPENDENT AUDITOR& apos;S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE. limited. PHIL BRYANT RAMONA HILL, CPA State Auditor Director, Financial and Compliance Audit Division 33 SUNFLOWER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT INDEPENDENT AUDITOR= S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAWS AND. intentionally) 35 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PHIL BRYANT AUDITOR INDEPENDENT AUDITOR& apos;S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS May 20, 1998 Superintendent and School Board Sunflower