Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba
CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Content Analysis (50%) 20 to >15.9 pts HD Consistently Use appropriate IB concepts and correct evidence from the case Attempts to use and apply a wide range of concepts 15.9 to >13.9 pts DI Use appropriate IB concepts and correct evidence from the case Attempts to use and apply a multiple concepts 13.9 to >11.9 pts CR Use and apply IB concepts with some minor mistakes 11.9 to >9.9 pts PA Analysis with the use of both IB concepts and evidence There are misuses of concepts 9.9 to >0 pts NN No relation between evidence and concepts 20 pts 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation performance Presentation slides (20%) 10 to >7.9 pts HD Slides were designed professionally and beautifully Visual aids were suitably used No slides contained excessive texts Fonts were consistent in all slides 7.9 to >6.9 pts DI Slides were designed professionally Visual aids were suitably used Slides did not contain excessive texts Fonts were consistent in all slides 6.9 to >5.9 pts CR Slides were well designed Visual aids were suitably used Slides did not contain excessive texts There could be some mistakes in fonts 5.9 to >4.9 pts PA Slides were not very well designed Visual aids were used but limited Some slides contained excessive texts There could be mistakes in fonts 4.9 to >0 pts NN Slides were not done well Visual aids were limited, and excessive texts were used instead There could be mistakes in fonts 11.9 to >9.9 pts PA Presentation was mostly communicated in a succinct and clear manner 9.9 to >0 pts NN Presentation was not communicated in a succinct and clear manner 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation performance Delivery (20%) 20 to >15.9 pts HD Presentation was very succinct and clear, skilfully using verbal and 15.9 to >13.9 pts DI Presentation was succinct and clear using verbal and non-verbal 13.9 to >11.9 pts CR Presentation was communicated in a succinct and clear manner non-verbal communication tools to build a narrative around the topic Excellent projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation, enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour Coordination among team members skilfully engaged the audience Presentation was within the timeframe Time was very well divided amongst the group members communication tools to build a narrative around the topic Good projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation, enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour Coordination among team members was very good and engaged the audience Presentation was within the timeframe Time was well divided amongst the group members using verbal and nonverbal communication tools; There were few instances of poor projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation, enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour Good coordination among team members and audience was engaged Presentation was within the timeframe Time was generally divided amongst the group members using verbal and nonverbal communication tools; There were many instances of poor projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation, enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour General coordination among team members but audience engagement was lacking Presentation was within the timeframe Time was generally divided amongst the group members using verbal and nonverbal communication tools; Poor projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation Poor enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour Presentation lacked coordination among team members, and did not engage the audience It might not delivered within the timeframe Time was not properly divided amongst the group members 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation performance Ability to answer questions (10%) 10 to >7.9 pts HD Very competent answers to questions: able to form answers that are succinct, clear and well supported Q&A response was excellent and handled by the whole team 10 pts Total Points: 100 7.9 to >6.9 pts DI Competent answers to questions: able to form answers that are mostly succinct, clear and supported Q&A response was very good and handled by the whole team 6.9 to >5.9 pts CR Quite good answers to questions: able to form answers which were at times unclear and not supported Q&A handled by a minority of the team 5.9 to >4.9 pts PA Poor answers to questions: unable to form answers Q&A handled by a minority of the team 4.9 to >0 pts NN Poor answers to questions: unable to form answers Q&A was not addressed as a team