whats wrong with the british constitution jan 2010

399 327 0
whats wrong with the british constitution jan 2010

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

[...]... first as to the composition of Parliament: THE constituent parts of a parliament are the next objects of our enquiry And these are, the king’s majesty, sitting there in his royal political capacity, and the three estates of the realm; the lords spiritual, the lords temporal, (who sit, together with the king, in one house) and the commons, who sit 20 What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? by themselves... document (other than an Act of Parliament), my 16 What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? vote would go to an exchange of letters between Prime Minister Asquith and King George V in autumn 1913 on the constitutional position of the sovereign The issues they contest are at the heart of the book I believe that, on all the main points, Asquith was right and the king was wrong But that is for the reader... all these conditions were satisfied: when Lord Byng did the same in Canada in 1926, they appeared to be, but in the event the third proved illusory I am &c., April 29.1 SENEX 18 What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? What should a discourse analyst, such as a constitutional lawyer, make of this? On the face of it, we do not know who wrote the letter, with what authority The writer states that there... sequence In the first (the Treaty), English and Scots negotiators agreed a set of terms for union In the second (the last Act of the Scottish Parliament), the Scots enacted the articles of the treaty, but announced in advance that their assent would be withdrawn if the English failed to accept the incorporated Act for the Security of the Church of Scotland The English were welcome to add an Act of their own... by themselves in another And the king and these three estates, together, form the great corporation or body politic of the kingdom, of which the king is said to be caput, principium, et finis For upon their coming together the king meets them, either in person or by representation; without which there can be no beginning of a parliament; and he also has alone the power of dissolving them (Blackstone 1765... for the security of the Church of England In the final document, namely the last Act of the English Parliament, the English did just that, while reciting and incorporating the Scottish Act Whether this third document is viewed as the last act of the English Parliament or (as the various collections of Statutes do) the first Act of the Parliament of Great Britain, it imposes two conflicting duties on the. .. (but not a dissolution) of the Union They were called ‘nationalists’ Their opponents were called ‘Unionists’ By the 1880s, Protestants from the north-east of Ireland tended to be fervent Unionists, but so did many English and Scottish people 8 What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? In spite of the Scottish and Irish difficulties, a traditional narrative of the British Constitution continued to... chambers the President and the House of Representatives Since the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, the Senate has also been directly elected As they are all elected by different procedures, the median voter in each is a different person, and the win set of the status quo is the set of policies that is not vetoed by the median (unique) President, the median Senator, or the median Representative There is therefore... elected by the people Neither Constitution may be amended unless the draft amendment is ratified by a supermajority of the people in a majority of the states 12 What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? The United States is a federal republic So, according to Galligan (1995), is Australia The former description is uncontroversial; the latter is controversial Australians had a constitutional crisis in... peers without an election, to the curbing of his powers in the Parliament Act 1911, limiting, but not eliminating, his veto It is still effective in the last years of a Parliament, when time has run out to enforce legislation by repeated passage through the Commons under the terms of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 I then introduce the concept of the ‘win set’ of the status quo The win set is the set .

Ngày đăng: 10/06/2014, 22:37

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • Contents

  • Preface

  • List of Tables

  • List of Figures

  • List of Abbreviations

  • PART I: THE OLD CONSTITUTION: TWO APPROACHES

    • Introduction

    • 1. The English Public Lawyers’ Constitution

    • 2. A Fresh Start: Veto Players, Win Sets, and Constitutional Moments

    • PART II: THE CONSTITUTION FROM BELOW

      • 3. 1707 and 1800: a Treaty (Mostly) Honoured and a Treaty Broken

      • 4. Why Should We Be Beggars with the Ballot in Our Hand?

      • 5. The Curious Incident of the Guns in the Night Time

        • Appendix to Chapter 5. How Much Did Bonar Law Know About the Larne Gunrunning?

        • 6. The Contradictions of Professor Dicey

        • 7. Causes and Consequences of the Unionist Coup d‘État

        • PART III: THE EROSION OF DICEYAN IDEOLOGY

          • 8. The Impact of UK Devolution

          • 9. The European Union and Other Supranational Entanglements

          • 10. Human Rights

            • Appendix to Chapter 10. European Convention on Human Rights and Protocols Adopted by the United Kingdom as of 2008

            • PART IV: THINGS TO LEAVE OUT OF A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION

              • 11. Unelected Houses

              • 12. Monarchs

                • Appendix to Chapter 12. ‘The Constitutional Position of the Sovereign’: Letters between King George V and Prime Minister H. H. Asquith, Autumn 1913

                • 13. Established Churches

                • PART V: THINGS TO PUT IN

                  • 14. We the People

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan