(Luận văn) an empirical study on stock returns, volume, and volatility, listed companies on the ho chi minh city stock exchange stock exchange

t to UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY VIETNAM ng hi INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES THE HAGUES THE NETHERLANDS ep w n lo ad VIETNAM – NETHERLANDS PROGRAMME FOR M.A IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ju y th yi pl n ua al n va AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON STOCK RETURNS, VOLUME, AND VOLATILITY: ll fu LISTED COMPANIES ON THE HO CHI MINH CITY STOCK EXCHANGE oi m By at nh z Nguyen Dinh Tu Nhi z k jm ht vb om l.c gm MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS n a Lu n va y te re July 2012 th t to UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY VIETNAM ng INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES THE HAGUES THE NETHERLANDS hi ep w n lo ad VIETNAM – NETHERLANDS PROGRAMME FOR M.A IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ju y th yi pl AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON STOCK RETURNS, VOLUME, AND VOLATILITY: al n ua LISTED COMPANIES ON THE HO CHI MINH CITY STOCK EXCHANGE n va ll fu A thesis submitted to Vietnam – Netherlands Programme in partial fulfillment m oi of the requirements for the degree of nh at MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS z z k jm n Dr Truong Tan Thanh a Lu Supervisor om l.c gm Nguyen Dinh Tu Nhi ht vb By n va y te re th July 2012 t to ng ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS hi ep w I am not able to finish this thesis without the guidance of my supervisors and committee n lo members, supports from classmates, and aids from my family ad y th I would like to express my very great appreciation to my supervisors, Dr Le Van Chon and Dr ju yi Truong Tan Thanh, for their patient guidance, enthusiastic assistance, and useful critiques, valuable and pl ua al constructive suggestions during my research I am also particularly grateful for the assistance given by n Dr Nguyen Trong Hoai and Dr Pham Khanh Nam for motivating and supporting me to complete the va n thesis I would like to offer another thank to Dr Duong Nhu Hung, who inspires me to choose this topic fu ll for my thesis My grateful thanks are also extended to staffs of the Administration Department and m oi Library of Vietnam-Netherlands Programme in providing me good environment and facilities to complete at nh the thesis z z Finally, I would like to express my love and gratitude to my family and friends for their k jm ht vb understanding, supports, and encouragements throughout the research om l.c gm n a Lu n va y te re th t to ng TABLE OF CONTENTS hi ep w INTRODUCTION n CHAPTER 1: lo Problem statement Research questions 3 Research objectives ad ju y th yi LITERATURE REVIEW pl CHAPTER 2: The Efficient Market Hypothesis The Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis The Sequential Information Arrival Hypothesis 10 The Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity 10 n ua al n va fu VIETNAMESE STOCK MARKET AND LISTED COMPANIES ON 15 ll m CHAPTER 3: oi THE HO CHI MINH CITY STOCK EXCHANGE 15 nh Vietnamese stock market 15 Data 17 Summary statistics 22 Graphical analysis 25 at z z jm ht vb ECONOMETRIC MODELS AND DISCUSSION 27 k CHAPTER 4: Test for stationarity in stock return and trading volume: 27 Trading volume and return volatility 33 l.c CONCLUSIONS 48 om CHAPTER 5: gm n a Lu REFERENCE 51 n va y te re th t to ng hi LIST OF TABLES ep w PAGE n TABLE lo ad Table Description of stocks………………………………………………………….18 ju y th Table Descriptive statistics ………………………………………………………….22 yi Table ADF test……………………………………………………………………….28 pl ua al Table PP test ……………………………………………………………………… 31 n Table GARCH (1,1) model without LnVol………………………………………….36 va n Table Likelihood ratios of stocks…………………… …………………………… 39 fu ll Table GARCH (1,1) model with LnVol…………………………………………… 40 oi m at nh z z k jm ht vb om l.c gm n a Lu n va y te re th t to ng hi ABSTRACT ep AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON STOCK RETURNS, VOLUME, AND VOLATILITY - w n LISTED COMPANIES ON THE HO CHI MINH CITY STOCK EXCHANGE lo ad ju y th By yi Nguyen Dinh Tu Nhi pl n ua al va n The thesis examines the relationship between stock returns, trading volume and return volatility fu ll With the focus on listed companies on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange over the period oi m at nh between 01 Jan 2007 and 31 Dec 2011, the study conducts GARCH (1,1) to model the relationship between stock return, trading volume, and volatility We also include a dummy to capture possible z z ht vb effect of pre and post-crisis on stock return volatility The analysis results show that there exists an k jm influence of trading volume on stock return, even after controlling effects of foreign trading gm volume It is also evident that trading volume has some predictive power to return volatility We also find our results consistent with previous studies such as Clark (1973) and Copeland (1976) l.c om The result also implies that Vietnamese stock market is efficiently weak at least for listed n a Lu companies on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange n va Key words: Trading volume, stock returns, return volatility, foreign trading, GARCH y te re th t to CHAPTER 1: ng hi INTRODUCTION Problem statement ep In each country, the stock market reflects the health of its economy It does not only affect w foreign exchange and gold markets but also credit market and option market Actually, n lo ad when a stock market is strong, the investors often tend to convert foreign currency and gold y th into cash to invest in stocks It will depreciate foreign currency and gold consistently and ju yi vice versa In other hands, in term of weak stock market, the Government will tighten cash pl ua al flow for stocks as well as the banks will reduce disbursement for stocks and vice versa For n option market, the strong stock market will lead to growth of different kinds of options va n because investors expect to earn more profits ll fu oi m In Vietnam, the stock market also plays an important role to mirror the changing economy at nh For instance, when the information of bad debts or higher inflation is proclaimed, the VN- z index will decrease sharply Likewise, when the Government introduces some supporting z ht vb policies to the economy, the VN-index has a chance to increase The fluctuation of VN- k jm index also indicates a development or recession of economy That is called bi-directional gm effect of information and stock market om l.c In the mean-variance analysis, the expected stock returns and return volatility are important a Lu factors that investors concentrate on because returns and volatility imply risks for n investors’ portfolio Moreover, the volume of trade is also supposed to be an authoritative y te re return on stocks, they tend to deal more and lead to higher trading volume in the stock n va component of absorbing information in the stock market In case investors believe in higher trading volume will decrease Hence, the higher or lower trading volume may be a signal of th market In contrast, when they forecast lower return on stocks, they will trade less or the t to the fluctuations of stock returns ng hi As a result, the relationships among stock returns, trading volume and return volatility have ep become vital topics in empirical researches There are many papers on return-volume and w volume-volatility relationships For the return-volume relationship, Karpoff (1987) finds n lo ad the positive asymmetric relationship between volume and price change in the equity y th market Another model which also predicts the asymmetric relationship between trading ju yi volume and price changes is initiated by Epps (1975) and complemented by Jennings, pl ua al Starks, and Fellingham (1981) Two above models relates to flow of information n Furthermore, Granger, Morgenstern, and Godfrey (1964) and Granger (1968) use data of va n indices and individual stocks on the New York Stock Exchange to test the relationship fu ll between price changes and trading volume They find that price changes follow a random oi m at nh walk in which the past trend of stock price cannot predict its future trend Mohammadreza Mehrabanpoor, Babak Valizadeh Bahador, and Gholamreza Jandaghi (2005) also get the z z ht vb positive relationship between market turnover and indices on the Tehran Stock Exchange k jm In addition, Michael Long (2007) finds a significantly positive interaction between absolute gm value of call price changes and trading volume in the option markets om l.c For the volume-return volatility relationship, Engle (1982) originates the Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (ARCH) Model, which enumerates that stock returns follow a Lu n a mixture of distribution Later, Bollerslev (1986) starts the Generalized Autoregressive y te re of information flow Thus, the model is developed by Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1990), n va Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) Model and consider trading volume as a proxy Brailsford (1996) contends that the relationship between stock return volatility and volume th Brailsford (1996), Mestel, and Gurgul and Majdosz (2003) Moreover, Timothy J t to is positive through GARCH model However, some present opposite views A Fujihara ng and Mbodja Mougoue (1997) find that there is no causal relationship between return and hi ep volume According to Roland Mestel, Henryk Gurgul, and Pawel Majdosz (2003), the w relationship between stock return and trading volume is too weak to forecast each other n lo Berna Okan, Onur Olgun, and Sefa Takmaz (2009) conclude that trading volume has ad ju y th negative effect on return volatility by applying GARCH, EGARCH, and VAR models For yi the Vietnamese market, Truong Dong Loc (2009) investigates the unilateral causality effect pl ua al of HNX-index to trading volume Furthermore, Truong Dong Loc and Dang Thi Thuy n Duong (2011) replicate the study with the data of foreign trading volume, and find that the va n index influences net foreign volume, but the reverse is not true fu ll There are only few researches that has examined relationship between stock returns and oi m at nh trading volume during the recent crisis, and accounted for effect of foreign trading volume across different industries using GARCH model This thesis attempts to fill this gap by z z ht vb examining the relationship between trading volume and stock return and between return k jm and volatility for listed companies on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange Particularly, gm we test the effect of trading volume on stock return and return volatility by applying om l.c GARCH (1, 1) model Research questions a Lu n To clarify the relationships among trading volume, stock returns and return volatility, I y te re is that, in this paper, I am going to answer the following research questions: n va collect data series of intra-day stock prices to test the appropriate model The final purpose Is there the relationship between trading volume and return volatility? and (ii) Does trading volume cause stock returns? th (i) t to Research objectives ng To reach above aims, my objectives of the paper are: hi ep (1) To examine the relationship between trading volume and return volatility and, w n (2) To understand the impact of trading volume on stock return through GARCH (1,1) lo ad model y th ju To that end, I use data of eight listed companies on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange yi pl (HOSE) before and after the recession triggered by the US sub-prime mortgage crisis ua al The remainder of the paper is arranged as follows Section Two gives a brief literature n va review of empirical studies Section three presents description of Vietnamese stock market n fu ll and explains specific characteristics of data This section also exposes statistics of selected m oi stocks in the HOSE The methodology and discussion of empirical results are in section nh at four which is followed by Conclusion z z k jm ht vb om l.c gm n a Lu n va y te re th t to shock effects on the returns This sum of (βε + βσ) also indicates the volatility clustering5 ng which sustains the asymmetry and inefficiency in the emerging market The higher hi ep persistence is, the more slowly the volatility of returns falls In other words, the high w persistence indicates slow regression to the mean, the low persistence shows rapid n lo retrogression to the meal The volatility persistence of conditional variance of VIC is very ad ju y th high (greater than 90 percent), especially VIC is close to unity, indicating that the volatility yi shock is persistent Meanwhile, the persistence of PVD and SSI are very low (lower than pl n percent ua al 50 percent) The volatility persistence of the rest of stocks is moderate from 70 to 80 va n In the mean equation, all the constants for stocks are negative and significant at one fu ll percent level As a result, all returns tend to decrease However, the coefficient of lag oi m at nh returns is positive consistently and statistically significant at one percent level Obviously, the coefficients of lag return of VIC (0.24), SSI (0.23), and GMD (0.21) have larger effect z z ht vb on returns than FPT (0.15), VSH (0.12), VNM (0.12), and DPM (0.11) The coefficient of k jm lag return of PVD has low impact on return (0.09) Hence, VIC and SSI have a giant gm impact of lag returns on current returns; however, PVD is reverse case om l.c For more than 80 percent of stocks, the coefficients of percentage of trading volume are positive and significant; therefore, there is a positive relationship between return and a Lu n trading volume Still, in case of SSI, the parameter has no meaning However, trading n va volume percent merely affects average return slightly Particularly, parameters of trading y te re th Volatility clustering: large changes tend to be followed by large changes and small changes tend to be followed by small changes 43 t to volume are from 0.001 to 0.003 for almost stocks; especially the percentage of volume of ng SSI does not affect return hi ep In most of cases, foreign buy volume percent does not influence return because of w insignificant parameters Still, the VIC’s coefficient is positive significantly at one percent n lo ad level with negligible impact with only 0.00047 y th ju I turn to percentage of foreign sell volume DPM, FPT, and GMD have no interaction yi pl between foreign sell volume percent with return due to insignificant parameter For the n ua al remaining stocks, their parameters are negative significantly at one percent level, except for n va SSI’s positive effect at one percent level Nevertheless, the impact of foreign sell volume ll fu percent on stock return is also negligible m oi The dummy variable of period influences somewhat on returns The coefficients of dummy nh variables for DPM, PVD, FPT, VNM, and SSI are positive significantly at one percent at z level, thus the impact of post-crisis on these stock returns is positive The pre or post-crisis z vb influences DPM, PVD, FPT, VNM, and SSI k jm ht does not determine return in case of VIC, GMD, and VSH Generally, the crisis only gm In term of return volatility equation, all constants for eight stocks are negative at one l.c om percent significant level The percentage of trading volume does affect return volatility a Lu positively at one percent significant level The percentage of trading volume strongly n impacts volatility of FPT with parameter of 1.36, DPM, VSH, and PVD with 1.15 th 44 y causes FPT’s return volatility strongly, but VIC’s one weakly te re are demonstrated by parameters of 0.81, 0.63, and 0.42 Generally, the trading volume n va Meantime, the little impacts of trading volume on return volatility of SSI, GMD and VIC t to In contrast, the foreign investors’ purchase power for almost stocks impacts negatively on ng return volatility The parameters of foreign buy volume percents for more than 60 percent hi ep of stocks are significant at one percent level, involving FPT (-0.37), SSI (-0.23), DPM (- w 0.21), VNM (-0.20), and VSH (-0.06) successively Besides, the percentage of PVD’s n lo foreign buy volume influences slightly on volatility (-0.076) at ten percent significant level, ad yi more ju y th while the VIC and GMD’s return volatilities are not caused by foreign purchase power any pl ua al The percentage of foreign investors’ sell power absolutely does not impact volatility in n cases of DPM, PVD, SSI, and VIC It influences VNM and FPT’s return volatility at one va n percent level and GMD’s at five percent positively, whereas VSH’s at one percent ll fu oi m negatively at nh Finally, about sub-periods, there are negative impacts of the post-crisis on volatility in most z of cases That is, 50 percent of stocks have negative parameters at one percent significant z ht vb level accounting for PVD, SSI, VIC, and VSH More than 30 percent of stocks are k jm significant at five percent However, there is no relationship between the pre and post-crisis gm period with return volatility of DPM om l.c My results probably support the MDH since the trading volume is in significantly positive a Lu relationship to return and volatility Moreover, the model including volume has lower n persistence of volatility shocks than the model excluding variable volume My findings y te re Zarraga (2003), Pyun et al (2000), and Bohl and Henke (2003) n va support papers of Andersen (1996), Chen and Tse (1993), Omran and McKenzie (2000), the return volatility is measured by past values of squared residuals and past volatility 45 th In my findings, for all stocks mentioned, all stock returns are mirrored by lagged return and t to Almost stock prices reflect information in the past As a result, the weak-form efficiency ng seems to dominate over other forms on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange hi ep Forecasting the volatility models is very important for application in investments, w evaluation of stocks, risk management and monetary policy making According to Poon n lo ad and Granger (2003), many financial institutions have to forecast volatility exactly in the y th financial market because financial volatility can cause a large consequence to the economy ju yi Therefore, the policy makers need to depend on estimators of financial volatility to pl ua al consider damages for financial markets and the economy as a whole For instance, the n Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX-index) is used to measure va n volatility of S&P 500 index options next 30 days It is really necessary for both investors fu ll and the US Federal Reserve to predict securities, currencies for creating monetary policies oi m at nh (Nassar, 1992) z Consequently, in my own paper, the investors can draw decision on investment based on z ht vb understanding the relationship between volume, return, and return volatility and analyzing k jm my numbers For example, they can invest in stock DPM in fertilizer safely and consider gm stocks SSI and VIC in finance carefully They also decide a short-term, medium-term or om l.c long-term investment horizon for each of stocks accordingly Moreover, they can refer statistics of foreign buy and sell volume to determine to buy or sell owned-shares rationally a Lu n (but only for eight above stocks) For policy makers, they can follow estimators to n va recognize which industries should be stimulated or survived y te re th 46 t to Nevertheless, I only suggest eight distinguishing industries presenting essential sectors ng which impact the economy seriously I have no studies on penny stocks6 with small hi ep capitalization and slight impacts on the entire economy, but high speculation and risks w Therefore, my findings and discussions in this paper may not support investors focusing on n lo cent stocks7 ad ju y th yi pl n ua al n va ll fu oi m at nh z z k jm ht vb om l.c gm n a Lu n va y te re Penny stocks: are common shares of small public companies with high risks and low liquidity Cent stocks: similar to penny stocks 47 th t to CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS ng hi The paper investigates the relationship between percentage of volume and return volatility ep by the GARCH (1,1) model Using data series of stock prices and trading volume of eight w blue-chip8 stocks on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange in the period of 01 January n lo ad 2007 to 31 December 2011, I find that there are impacts of trading volume, foreign buy and y th sell volume together with recession on return and volatility, respectively due to analysis of ju yi GARCH (1, 1) model The lagged returns for eight stocks influence the current returns pl ua al extremely Meantime, VIC and SSI’ lagged returns have stronger effects on present returns n than others The trading volume for more than 80 percent of stocks (except for SSI) and va n foreign sell volume for more than 60 percent of stocks (excluding DPM, FPT, and GMD) fu ll affect stock returns, but inconsiderably; whereas the foreign buy volume for more than 85 oi m at nh percent of stocks does not have any influences on returns (excluding slightly VIC effect) The dummy variable of recession intervals demonstrates its impact on returns for five z z ht vb stocks, comprising DPM, PVD, SSI, VNM, and FPT k jm For return volatility, all ARCH and GARCH effects for stocks are significant and their gm persistence is lower than unity which is consistent to assumption of stationery data The om l.c significant ARCH expresses the dependence of current return volatility on the lagged error terms; in addition, the significant GARCH indicates the impact of the lagged variance on a Lu n conditional variance In this case, there is a large impact of trading volume on return y te re The foreign buy volume (except for VIC, GMD, and VSH) influence return volatility n va volatility for all stocks, especially largest impact on PVD, DPM, and VSH’s volatilities th Blue-chip stocks: common stocks with high capitalization, strong finance, established companies and leader in the market 48 t to negatively, meanwhile, the foreign sell volume impacts return volatility for half of total ng stocks The recession influences return volatility for almost stocks negatively, except no hi ep impact on DPM The results may supplement to the MDH Moreover, the inclusion of w trading volume in the GARCH (1,1) model is better than the exclusion of volume in the n lo model Although the model with volume has lower persistence of volatility shocks than the ad ju y th model without volume, it is better than the model excluding volume corresponding to yi supposal of stationarity pl ua al On the other hands, the paper also presents some limitations noticed Firstly, the research n has not studied impact of other factors on the stock return, such as inflation rate, interest va n rate, price of gasoline, price of gold, macroeconomic policies, and so on yet Secondly, the fu ll selected high-capitalization eight stocks only present and result in deduction of eight major oi m at nh sectors on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Market Therefore, the above findings may not be representative to all stocks on both the Ho Chi Minh and the Ha Noi stock markets, such as z z ht vb stocks in other industries (outside above eight ones) or even penny stocks Finally, the k jm GARCH (1,1) model has not resolved the asymmetric and skewness issues of stock returns gm GARCH (1,1) model also contains some disadvantages since it does not permit the om l.c asymmetric shocks in the conditional variance Therefore, the extended models should be employed, such as asymmetric Exponential GARCH (EGARCH) model of Nelson (1991), a Lu NGARCH model of Engle and Ng (1993), TGARCH model of Zakoian (1994), QGARCH n n va model of Sentana (1995) or IGARCH model as a restricted version of GARCH model y te re Therefore, the next generations can collect more data series on different factors (excluding GARCH (1,1) model for more stocks in various sections on both the Ho Chi Minh City and 49 th trading volume) to conduct the model and derive supportive findings They can run t to the Ha Noi City Securities Exchanges to represent for all kinds of stocks They also ng research on relationship between trading volume and returns for penny stocks to exuberate hi ep findings Moreover, they can apply extended asymmetric models to learn more about w GARCH models n lo ad In addition, mentioning on the market efficiency, my findings entail that the weak-form y th efficiency is prominent in comparison with semi-strong and strong forms ju yi pl n ua al n va ll fu oi m at nh z z k jm ht vb om l.c gm n a Lu n va y te re th 50 t to REFERENCE ng hi [1] Admati, A.R., and Pfleiderer, P., A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price ep Variability, Review of Financial Studies (1988), 3-40 w n [2] Ali Ahmed, Huson Joher, The Relationship between Trading Volume, Volatility and lo ad Stock Market Returns: A Test of Mixed Distribution Hypothesis for a Pre - and Post y th ju Crisis on Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, Investment Management and Financial yi pl Innovations (2005), 146-158 al n ua [3] Andrew, W.L., and Jiang, W., Trading Volume, Definition, Data Analysis and n va Implications of Portfolio Theory, Review of Financial Studies 13 (2000), 257-300 fu ll [4] Anirut Pisedtasalasai, Return and Trading Volume Transmissions Mechanisms m oi between a Super-Large Stocks and General Stocks in the market: a New Zealand nh at Case, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 25 (2009), 217-230 z z [5] Berna Okan, Onur Olgun, and Sefa Takmaz, Volume and Volatility: A Case of Ise-30 ht vb jm Index Futures, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 32 (2009), k 93-103 gm om l.c [6] Bong-Soo Lee, Oliver M Rui, the Dynamic Relationship between Stock Returns and Trading Volume: Domestic and Cross-Country Evidence, Journal of Banking and a Lu Finance 26 (2002), 51-78 n n va [7] Bollerslev, T., Generalised Conditional Autoregressive Heteroskedasticity, Journal of te re Econometrics 31 (1986), 307-327 y Prices and Rates of Return, Review of Economics and Statistics (1987), 542-547 51 th [8] Bollerslev, T., A Conditional Heteroskedasticity Time Series Model for Speculative t to [9] B.M Nowbutsing and S Naregadu, Returns, Trading Volume and Volatility in the ng Stock Market of Mauritius, African Journal of Accounting, Economics, Finance, and hi ep Banking Research (2009), 1-36 w [10] Brajesh Kumar, Priyanka Singh, and Ajay Pandey, the Dynamic Relationship between n lo ad Price and Trading Volume: Evidence from Indian Stock Market, 2009, Working Paper, y th Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad ju yi pl [11] Brailsford TJ, the Empirical Relationship between Trading Volume, Returns, and n ua al Volatility, Accounting and Finance 35 (1996), 89-111 n va [12] Brooks, R., Faff, R., and Mckenzie, M., Bivariate Garch Estimation of Beta Risk in the ll fu Australian Banking Industry, Accountability Performance (2000), 81-102 m oi [13] Brooks, R., Faff, R., and Fry, T., GARCH Modelling of Individual Stock Data: The nh at Impact of Censoring, Firm Size and Trading Volume, Journal of International z z Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 11 (2001), 215-222 ht vb k gm Working Paper, Princeton University jm [14] Burton G Malkiel, the Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics, 2003, CEPS Stock Returns, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (1993), 905-939 om l.c [15] Campbell, J., Grossman, S., and Wang, J., Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in a Lu n [16] Clark, P.K., A Subordinate Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for th 52 y Information Arrival, Journal of Finance 31 (1976), 1149-1168 te re [17] Copeland, T.E., A Model of Asset Trading Under the Assumption of Sequential n va Speculative Prices, Econometrica 41 (1973), 135–155 t to [18] D Michael Long, An examination of the Price – Volume relationship in the Option ng Markets, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 10 (2007), 47-56 hi ep [19] Dang Huu Man, A Research on Predictability of Capital Market Risk Management w n Models – Case of Value-At-Risk Models, Journal of Science and Technology (2009), lo ad 126-134 y th ju [20] Engle, R., and Mustafa, C., Implied ARCH Models from Option Price, Journal of yi pl Econometrics 52 (1992), 289-311 al n ua [21] Epps, T., and Epps, M., the Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and n va Transaction Volumes: Implications for the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis, ll fu Econometrica 44 (1976), 305-321 m oi [22] Faid Gul and Tariq Javed, Relationship between Trading Volume and Stock Exchange nh at Performance: A Case from Karachi Stock Exchange, International Business & z z Economics Research Journal 8(2009), 13-20 ht vb jm [23] Fauzia Mubarik & Attiya Y Javid, Relationship between Stock Return, Trading k Volume and Volatility: Evidence from Pakistani Stock Market, Asia Pacific Journal of om l.c gm Finance and Banking Research (2009), 1-17 [24] George E Tauchen and Mark Pitts, the Price Variability-Volume Relationship on n a Lu Speculative Markets, Econometrica 51 (1983), 485-505 y te re Volume, and the Daily Flow of Information, Journal of Business 79 (2006), 1551- n va [25] Jeff Fleming, Chris Kirby, and Barbara Ostdiek, Stochastic Volatility, Trading th 1590 53 t to [26] Jingliang Xiao, Robert D Brooks, and Wing Keung Wong, Garch and Volume Effects ng in the Australian Stock Markets, Journal of Annals of Financial Economics (2009), hi ep 79-105 w [27] Harris, L., Cross-Security Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis, Journal of n lo ad Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21 (1986), 39-46 y th ju [28] Harris, L., Transaction Data Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis, Journal yi pl of Financial Quantitative Analysis (1987), 127-141 al n ua [29] Karpoff, The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: a Survey, The n va Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22 (1987), 109-126 fu ll [30] Kemal Saatcioglu and Laura T Starks, The Stock Price-Volume Relationship in m oi Emerging Stock Markets: The Case of Latin America, International Journal of nh at Forecasting 14 (1998), 215-225 z z [31] Lamoureux, C.G., and Lastrapes, W.D., Heteroskedasaticity in Stock Returns Data: ht vb k jm Volume versus Garch Effects, Journal of Finance 45 (1990a), 221–229 gm [32] Lamoureux, C.G., and Lastrapes, W.D., Persistence in Variance, Structural Change om l.c and the Garch Model, Journal of Business Economic Statistic (1990b), 225-234 [33] Malabika Deo, K Srinivasan, and K Devanadhen, The Empirical Relationship a Lu n between Stock Returns, Trading Volume and Volatility: Evidence from Select Asia- n va Pacific Stock Market, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative te re Sciences 12 (2008), 58-68 y Department of Computer Science 54 th [34] Martin Sewell, History of the Efficient Market Hypothesis, 2011, Research Note, UCL t to [35] Marwan J Darwish, Testing the Contemporaneous and Causal Relationship between ng Trading Volume and Return in the Palestine Exchange, Interdisciplinary Journal of hi ep Contemporary Research in Business (2012), 55-64 w [36] Michael T Maloney and J Harold Mulherin, the complexity of price discovery in an n lo ad efficient market: the stock market reaction to the Challenger crash, Journal of y th Corporate Finance (2003), 453-479 ju yi pl [37] Mohammadreza Mehrabanpoor, Babak Valizadeh Bahador, and Gholamreza Jandaghi, al n ua Stock Exchange Indices and Turnover Value-Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange, n va African Journal of Business Management (2011), 783-791 ll fu [38] Safi Ullah Khan, and Faisal Rizwan, Trading Volume and Stock Returns: Evidence m oi from Pakistan’s Stock Market, International Review of Business Research Papers nh (2008), 151-162 at z z [39] Sarika Mahajan, and Balwinder Singh, the Empirical Investigation of Relationship vb k Journal of Business and Economics (2009), 113-137 jm ht between Return, Volume and Volatility Dynamics in Indian Stock Market, Eurasian gm [40] Sharma, L.J., Mougoue, M., and Kamath, R., Heteroscedasticity in Stock Market l.c om Indicator Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects, Applied Financial Economics a Lu (1996), 337-342 n n va [41] Surya Bahadur G.C., Volatility Analysis of Nepalese Stock Market, the Journal of y te re Nepalese Business Studies (2008), 76-84 Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (2001), 157-168 55 th [42] Robert Engle, Garch 101: The Use of Arch/ Garch Models in Applied Econometrics, t to [43] Roger A Fujihara and Mbodja Mougoue, Linear and Nonlinear Causal Relationships ng between Price Variability and Volume in Petroleum Futures Markets, The Journal of hi ep Futures markets 17 (1997), 385-416 w [44] Tarika Singh and Seema Mehta, Volatility of Stock Returns: A Case Study of Selected n lo ad Asian Indices, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 45 (2010), y th 46-57 ju yi pl [45] Tarun Chordia and Bhaskaran Swaminathan, Trading Volume and Cross- n ua al Autocorrelations in Stock Returns, The Journal of Finance 55 (2000), 913-935 n va [46] Tauchen, G.E and Pitts, M., the Price Variability–Volume Relationship on Speculative ll fu Markets, Econometrica 51 (1983), 485–505 m oi [47] Timothy J Brailsford, The Empirical Relationship between Trading Volume, Returns nh at and Volatility, 1994, Research Paper, University of Melbourne z z [48] Thomas E Copeland and Daniel Friedman, the Effect of Sequential Arrival on Asset ht vb k jm Prices: An Experimental Study, the Journal of Finance 42 (1987), 763-797 gm [49] Truong Dong Loc, The Causal Relation between Stock Price and Trading Volume: om l.c Evidence from The Hanoi Stock Trading Center, Economic Development Review 178 (2009), 11-15 a Lu n [50] Truong Dong Loc, and Dang Thi Thuy Duong, The Relationship between Hnx-Index n va and Volume of Trading of Foreign Investors, The Journal of Banking Technology 62 te re (2011), 4-8 y th 56 t to [51] Vuong Thanh Long, Empirical Analysis of Stock Return Volatility with Regime ng Change Using Garch Model: the Case of Vietnam Stock Market, 2008, Working paper hi ep 084 http://www.vdf.org.vn/workingpapers/vdfwp084 w [52] Wong, W.K., Leung, P.L., and Xu, J., the Garch Effects on the Volume of China Stock n lo ad Markets, International Journal of Finance 17 (2005), 3290-3329 y th ju [53] W S Chan and Y K Tse, Price-Volume Relation in Stocks: A Multiple Time Series yi pl Analysis on the Singapore Market, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 10 (2005), 39- n ua al 56 n va ll fu oi m at nh z z k jm ht vb om l.c gm n a Lu n va y te re th 57