Medicine ® Observational Study OPEN Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year among advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in Viet Nam, 2018 ∗ Thuy Van Ha, PhDa, Minh Van Hoang, MD, PhDb, , Mai Quynh Vu, MScb, Ngoc-Anh Thi Hoang, BPhb, Long Quynh Khuong, MDb, Anh Nu Vu, MSca, Phuong Cam Pham, MD, PhDc, Chinh Van Vu, MD, MScd, Lieu Huy Duong, MD, PhDd Abstract Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/md-journal by BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVDJivV4JHtPRv2CrVfH3jkBojVc5NO2YExGtgneTLtiaa/tflp4P76w= on 03/02/2020 To examine the willingness to pay (WTP) for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Viet Nam and to analyze the factors affecting an individual’s WTP A cross-sectional, contingent valuation study was conducted among 400 NSCLC patients across national hospitals in Viet Nam Self-reported information was recorded from patients regarding their socio-demographic status, EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) utility, EQ-5D vas, and WTP for QALY gained To explore the factors related to the WTP, Gamma Generalized Linear Model and multiple logistic regression tools were applied to analyze data The overall mean and median of WTP/QALY among the NSCLC patients were USD $11,301 and USD $8002, respectively Strong association was recorded between WTP/QALY amount and the patient’s education, economic status, comorbidity status, and health utility Government and policymakers should consider providing financial supports to disadvantaged groups to improve their access to life saving cancer treatment H P Abbreviations: EQ-5D = EuroQol-5 dimensions, GDP = gross domestic product, NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer, QALY = quality-adjusted life year, WTP = willingness to pay Keywords: 2018, non-small cell lung cancer, QALY, Viet Nam, willingness to pay U Introduction 2012.[4] More than 80% of the lung cancer cases in Viet Nam were NSCLC, with majority of case (about 89%) Viet Nam being detected at advanced stages (IIIB or IV) A study conducted in 2014 reported that the economic burden of NSCLC in Viet Nam was more than 3517 billion VND, equivalent to $150 million Given the significant economic burden of NSCLC in Viet Nam, cost-effective strategies for Viet Nam are needed to better manage NSCLC cases In Viet Nam, health technology assessments such as costeffectiveness or cost-utility analysis has recently been applied to evaluate and recommend medicines for reimbursement as part of the health insurance scheme.[5] Cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analysis estimates the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio by comparing health interventions Interventions are considered “good value for money” if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio falls below a certain cost-effectiveness threshold This threshold has been normally based on the level of population’s willingness to pay (WTP) for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained Estimating the WTP for a QALY gained threshold among NSCLC patients would provide important information for implementation of health technology assessment to prioritize health interventions against NSCLC in Viet Nam This study will be the first to examine the WTP for a QALY gained among advanced NSCLC patients in Viet Nam and the factors affecting WTP Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, accounting for nearly 10 million deaths in 2018.[1] Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma, making up approximately 80% to 85% of lung cancer cases worldwide.[2] NSCLC has a significant financial burden to society that increases with disease progression.[3] In Viet Nam, lung cancer was reported to be the second leading cause of cancer mortality for both males and females since Editor: Daryle Wane TVH and MVH contributed equally to this paper H This study was financially supported by the Viet Nam Health Economics Association and AstraZeneca pharmaceutical company The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose a Viet Nam Department of Health Insurance, Ministry of Health, b Hanoi University of Public Health, c Bach Mai Hospital, d Viet Nam Health Economics Association, Hanoi, Viet Nam ∗ Correspondence: Minh Van Hoang, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam (e-mail: hvm@huph.edu.vn) Copyright © 2020 the Author(s) Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited How to cite this article: Van Ha T, Van Hoang M, Vu MQ, Hoang NA, Khuong LQ, Vu AN, Pham PC, Van Vu C, Duong LH Willingness to pay for a qualityadjusted life year among advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in Viet Nam, 2018 Medicine 2020;99:9(e19379) Methods 2.1 Study design Received: 20 August 2019 / Received in final form: 24 December 2019 / Accepted: 30 January 2020 A cross-sectional study was conducted using contingent valuation method, a survey-based economic practice, which asks http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019379 Van Ha et al Medicine (2020) 99:9 Medicine communicate well, were conveniently selected from these study hospitals NSCLC patients who were unaware of their own health problem were excluded from the study All 400 questionnaires were accepted because of no missing data and logical error Table The starting bids in the iterative bidding technique No (1) ∗ Compared to average GDP (2) First bid (in VND) (3) = (2) GDP First bid (in USD) ∗ (4) = (3)/23,200 5,000,000 10,000,000 25,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 216 432 1078 1724 2155 2.3 Data collection and study questionnaire Physicians from the studied hospitals were briefed on the study objectives before referring the selected patients to the interviewers The NSCLC patients were then interviewed by trained interviewers after their routine consultation Patients were asked about their health states (or utility) using the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 levels instrument (EQ-5D-5L) (the Vietnamese version).[9] The health utilities ranged from = “ perfect health” to = “death” Negative values represented health states the person considers worse than death To measure the patient’s willingness to pay, an iterative bidding technique was applied, consisting of a sequence of dichotomous choice questions (i.e., yes or no) followed by a final open-ended question Data collectors presented individual patients with the following question “Assuming a novel treatment method would be available now, that could free you from lung cancer and allow you to recover perfectly without any side effects, but the treatment is not covered by health insurance and you would have to pay for the treatment costs, would you be willing to pay an amount of [starting bid] per year for this kind of treatment?” Patients were randomly assigned bids of USD $216, $432, $1078, $1724, $2155, equating to VND 5,000,000; 10,000,000; 25,000,000; 40,000,000; 50,000,000, respectively (Table 1) These figures were benchmarked at 1; 2; 5; 7; GDP per capita in Viet Nam for 2017, respectively.[10] If the patient was willing to pay for the treatment at the rate of the first bid offered, then a follow-up question with a higher bid would be asked If the respondent was unwilling to pay for the first suggested amount, then the second threshold would be reduced to a lower level Following the double-bounded dichotomous question, all patients were presented with an open-ended question “What is the maximum price you would be willing to pay per year for the treatment?” An example of the bidding technique is represented in Figure We use the currency exchange at the time of analysis: USD = 23,200 VND individuals how much they are willing to pay for a particular goods or service.[6–8] 2.2 Study subjects, sample size, and sampling Patients with advanced stages of NSCLC (IIIB or IV stage) aged between 18 and 70 years were selected for this study The sample size was estimated using the WHO formula for estimating population proportion: n ẳ Z21a=2ị H P P1 Pị d2 The value n defines the minimum sample size required, P is the anticipated proportion of NSCLC patients who were willing to pay for a QALY gained equal or above GDP (gross domestic product) = 50% (proportion estimated for the largest sample), d is an absolute precision (.05) and Z1a/2 = 1.96 (a = 5%) The minimum sample size was calculated to be 384 To account for non-response rate, a sample of 400 NSCLC patients were recruited for this study The study was conducted in the oncology departments of referral hospitals in Viet Nam, which had the appropriate medical equipment for the treatment of cancer These sites included: Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi Oncology Hospital, Viet Nam National Cancer Hospital (in the North), Da Nang Hospital (in the Center), Cho Ray Hospital, and Ho Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University Hospital (in the South) From September to December 2018, 400 NSCLC patients, who could U H Figure Example of iterative bidding technique with an initial bid of 25,000,000 VND Van Ha et al Medicine (2020) 99:9 www.md-journal.com In addition, self-reported patient’s characteristics were recorded, including: sex, age, education, occupation, economic status, and health behavior such as smoking and alcohol use Characteristics of respondents 2.4 Data management and analysis N Gender Table Factor All study data were entered into EpiData 3.1 management software, and statistical analysis was then carried out using Stata 14 Health utility of the NSCLC patients was derived from the Viet Nam EQ-5D score set The WTP/QALY ratio for each participant was computed using the following formula: WTP=QALY ¼ Age group Education WTP curent patient0 s health utility Occupation Descriptive analyses were applied to determine the background characteristics of the study participants The generalized linear model with link (log) and gamma distribution was applied to identify individual’s socio-economic traits that would influence the amount of WTP (as the data on WTP max amount were right skewed) A logistic regression model was performed, with a significance level of 05, to estimate the probability of willingness to pay for a QALY gained at the bid of equal or greater than per capita GDP of Viet Nam in 2017 Living area Ethnicity Male Female 18–29 yr 30–39 yr 40–49 yr 50–59 yr 60+ Primary and lower Secondary/High school Bachelor or higher Formal employee Informal employee Unemployed Urban Rural Kinh Minority Yes No Single Married Divorced/widowed Poor Non-poor Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Stage IIIB Stage IV H P Religion Marital status 2.5 Ethical considerations Economic status Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Hanoi University of Public Health Informed consent forms were obtained from all subjects before participating in the study Health insurance Smoking Alcohol use U Comorbidity Results Level Disease stage 3.1 General characteristics of the study respondents Utility value, mean (SD) Utility value, median (IQR) The general characteristics of the study respondents are summarized in Table The study sample consisted of more men (56.3%) than women (43.8%), majority (62.3%) of the participants were over 50 years old Most respondents (90.5%) completed secondary school or higher, with 9.5% having had an education level lower than primary school The proportion of people who worked in formal and informal economic sectors were quite similar (49.3% and 48.8%, respectively) There were slightly more patients from rural areas (53.5%) as compared to those from urban locations (46.5%) Almost all of respondents identified themselves as the Kinh (majority group) Most of them were married (90.8%) and had no religion (87.5%) Approximately 8.3% of the patients self-identified as poor (classified by the local government) All study respondents had health insurance The prevalence of smoking and alcohol drinking among the study respondents were 51.7% and 48.5%, respectively The percentage of patients with disease stage IIIB and IV were 25.8% and 74.2%, respectively About one-third of participants had other comorbidities The mean and median of EQ-5D health utility were 66 and 73, respectively H Value 400 225 (56.3%) 175 (43.8%) 23 (5.8%) 56 (14.0%) 72 (18.0%) 103 (25.8%) 146 (36.5%) 38 (9.5%) 129 (32.3%) 233 (58.3%) 197 (49.3%) 195 (48.8%) (2.0%) 186 (46.5%) 214 (53.5%) 394 (98.5%) (1.5%) 50 (12.5%) 350 (87.5%) 22 (5.5%) 363 (90.8%) 15 (3.8%) 33 (8.3%) 367 (91.8%) 400 (100.0%) 207 (51.7%) 193 (48.3%) 194 (48.5%) 206 (51.5%) 137 (34.3%) 263 (65.8%) 103 (25.8%) 297 (74.3%) 66 (.26) 73 (.60, 80) to USD $48,013) The WTP/QALY amount was identified to be higher among men, older patients, those with higher education, those who worked as formal employees, urban dwellers, Kinh people, non-poor people, non-smoking patients, non-drinking patients, patients without comorbidity, those with disease state IIIB and those with higher health utility (Table 3) The proportion of patients who were willing to pay for a QALY gained at the rate of equal or more than GDP per capita of Viet Nam (USD $2342) was 79.0% (95% CI: 74.7–82.9%) This was higher among men, older patients, those with higher education, those working as formal employees, urban dwellers, Kinh people, non-poor people, non-smoking patients, nondrinking patients, patients without comorbidity, those at disease state IIIB and those with higher health utility (Table 4) 3.3 Regression analyses of correlates of the WTP/QALY Gamma Generalized Linear Model (Table 5) shows that the WTP/QALY amount was significantly associated with respondent’s 3.2 Willingness to pay for a QALY gained (WTP/QALY) The overall mean and median of WTP/QALY among NSCLC patients were USD $11,301 and USD $8002, respectively (standard deviation of USD $11,175; with a range of USD $0 1) education – people with higher education were willing to pay a higher amount; Van Ha et al Medicine (2020) 99:9 Medicine Table Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year gained by patients’ characteristics Factor N Gender Age group Education Occupation Living area Ethnicity Economic status Health insurance Smoking Alcohol use Comorbidity Disease stage Utility value Level Mean Median SD Min Max Male Female 18–29 yr 30–39 yr 40–49 yr 50–59 yr 60+ Primary and lower Secondary/High school Bachelor or higher Formal employee Informal employee Unemployed Urban Rural Kinh Minority Poor Non-poor Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Stage IIIB Stage IV First quintile Second quintile Third quintile Fourth quintile Top quintile 11,301 11,759 10,712 12,877 10,340 10,716 10,268 12,439 7370 11,005 12,106 12,848 9962 5857 12,469 10,286 11,339 8804 4984 11,869 11,301 10,961 11,666 10,949 11,633 9400 12,291 12,414 10,915 4822 9617 13,839 14,164 14,490 8002 8002 7854 12,220 7470 6164 7881 8002 3200 8002 8002 8002 6473 2408 8002 7638 8002 4315 2589 8002 8002 8002 8002 7796 8002 7881 8002 8002 7809 2755 6360 8002 10,127 8043 11,175 11,482 10,771 11,823 10,533 12,625 9908 11,413 9637 10,871 11,469 11,188 11,060 8481 11,775 10,549 11,148 13,743 5554 11,381 11,175 10,899 11,481 10,638 11,674 9402 11,892 12,427 10,702 5698 9956 12,537 11,606 11,763 0 220 279 21 0 0 21 246 0 246 0 0 21 21 0 0 0 79 0 48,013 47,286 48,013 40,772 41,914 48,013 41,694 48,013 37,645 41,694 48,013 48,013 47,286 23,645 48,013 41,914 48,013 36,181 20,255 48,013 48,013 41,914 48,013 41,914 48,013 48,013 48,013 48,013 47,286 24,404 38,837 48,013 41,914 40,772 H P U Table 2) economic status – the non-poor people were willing to pay higher amount; 3) comorbidity status – people without the comorbidity were willing to pay higher amount; and 4) health utility – people with higher health utility were willing to pay higher amount Patients having willingness to pay equal or above gross domestic product by patients’ chacracteristics Factor N Gender Age group Education Occupation Living area Ethnicity Economic status Smoking Alcohol use Comorbidity Disease stage Utility value H Level n Proportion (%) Male Female 18–29 yr 30–39 yr 40–49 yr 50–59 yr 60+ Primary and lower Secondary/High school Bachelor or higher Formal employee Informal employee Unemployed Urban Rural Kinh Minority Poor Non-poor Yes No Yes No Yes No Stage IIIB Stage IV First quintile Second quintile Third quintile Fourth quintile Top quintile 400 225 175 23 56 72 103 146 38 129 233 197 195 186 214 394 34 366 207 193 194 206 137 263 103 297 85 75 87 97 56 79.0 80.9 76.6 73.9 73.2 76.4 77.7 84.2 68.4 75.2 82.8 85.8 73.3 5.00 79.6 78.5 79.4 5.00 52.9 81.4 76.8 81.3 78.9 79.1 76.6 80.2 79.6 78.8 55.3 84.0 83.9 84.5 91.1 95% CI 74.7; 75.1; 69.6; 51.6; 59.7; 64.9; 68.4; 77.3; 51.3; 66.8; 77.4; 80.1; 66.5; 15.7; 73.1; 72.4; 75.1; 11.8; 35.1; 77.1; 70.5; 75.1; 72.4; 72.9; 68.7; 74.9; 70.5; 73.7; 44.1; 73.7; 74.5; 75.8; 80.4; 82.9 85.8 82.6 89.8 84.2 85.6 85.3 89.7 82.5 82.4 87.4 90.3 79.4 84.3 85.1 83.8 83.3 88.2 70.2 85.3 82.4 86.6 84.4 84.5 83.4 84.9 86.9 83.3 66.1 91.4 90.9 91.1 97.0 Table report identifies the multiple logistic regression analysis of correlates of willing to pay for a QALY gained at the rate of equal or more than GDP per capita of Viet Nam There was a strong correlation between willingness to pay for a QALY gained at the rate of equal or more than GDP per capita of Viet Nam and economic status (the non-poor were willing to pay higher amount) and health utility (people with higher health utility were more likely willing to pay) Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study in Viet Nam to analyze WTP for a QALY gained among advanced NSCLC patients The evidence generated from this study may be useful for policymakers in prioritizing health interventions against NSCLC in Viet Nam Our study found that the overall mean WTP/QALY amount among NSCLC patients was USD $11,301 This is equal to about 4.4 GDP per capita of Viet Nam in 2017 This is much higher than the level of WTP/QALY among the general population in rural Viet Nam in 2012, which showed that the mean of WTP/ QALY ranges from USD $667 to USD $993 (.38–.56 GDP per capita of Viet Nam in 2012).[11] The WTP/QALY amount lies in Van Ha et al Medicine (2020) 99:9 www.md-journal.com Table Gamma Generalized Linear Model for willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year gained Factor Level Gender Male (ref) Female 18–29 yr (ref) 30–39 yr 40–49 yr 50–59 yr 60+ Primary and lower (ref) Secondary/High school Bachelor or higher Unemployed (ref) Formal employee Informal employee Urban (ref) Rural Kinh (ref) Minority Poor (ref) Non-poor Yes (ref) No Yes (ref) No Yes (ref) No Stage IIIB (ref) Stage IV Age group Education Occupation Living area Ethnicity Economic status Smoking Alcohol use Comorbidity Disease stage Utility value P-value Exp(b) 95% CI (lower; upper) 1.006 812; 1.247 956 935 857 993 1.134 582; 542; 637; 738; 782 506 977 566 1.490 1.628 1.044; 2.128 1.122; 2.364 028 010 2.022 2.026 991; 4.125 989; 4.152 986 053 868 704; 1.071 188 899 407; 1.989 794 1.888 1.316; 2.71 001 1.502 1.352 1.549 1.745 H P 997 717; 1.386 985 982 703; 1.372 917 1.302 1.069; 1.586 009 965 6.111 777; 1.198 4.317; 8.652 744