TheregulatorysubunitofacGMP-regulatedproteinkinaseA of
Trypanosoma brucei
Tarek Shalaby, Matthias Liniger and Thomas Seebeck{
Institute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Switzerland
This study reports the identification and characterization of
the regulatory subunit, TbRSU, ofproteinkinaseAof the
parasitic protozoon Trypanosoma brucei. TbRSU is coded
for by a single copy gene. Theprotein contains an unusually
long N-terminal domain, the pseudosubstrate site involved
in binding and inactivation ofthe catalytic subunit, and two
C-terminally located, closely spaced cyclic nucleotide
binding domains. Immunoprecipitation of TbRSU copre-
cipitates aproteinkinase activity with the characteristics of
protein kinase A: it phosphorylates aproteinkinase specific
substrate, and it is strongly inhibited by a synthetic protein
kinase inhibitor peptide. Unexpectedly, this kinase activity
could not be stimulated by cAMP, but by cGMP only.
Binding studies with recombinant cyclic nucleotide binding
domains of TbRSU confirmed that both domains bind
cGMP with K
d
values in the lower micromolar range, and
that up to a 100-fold excess of cAMP does not compete with
cGMP binding.
Keywords: sleeping sickness; proteinkinase A; African
trypanosomes; cyclic nucleotide signalling.
The concept of cellular signaling by cyclic AMP (cAMP)
has been maintained throughout evolution, from bacteria to
mammals. However, the only component of this signalling
pathway that has been strictly conserved is the second
messenger molecule itself, cAMP, while the enzymatic
machinery that generates and transduces the signal exhibits
great variety. This is exemplified by the adenylyl cyclases,
which have developed into many different molecular
structures [1–3], although their function is invariably to
convert ATP to cAMP. A similarly wide range of structure
and sequence diversity of functionally similar enzymes is
found within the cAMP-specific phosphodiesterases
(PDEs). On the basis of sequence comparison as well as
of pharmacological criteria, two distinct classes of
eukaryotic PDEs are currently distinguished, class I and
class II [4,5], with no significant sequence similarities
between them. Besides these, many PDEs have been
identified in bacteria that share no significant sequence
homology with either the class I or the class II of the
eukaryotic PDEs [6].
An even greater variety is encountered with the down-
stream effectors of cAMP signalling. cAMP can bind
directly to and regulate a number of different ion channels,
such as cyclic nucleotide gated ion channels [7,8] or
hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated chan-
nels [9]. On the other hand, cAMP can bind to and stimulate
drug efflux pumps, e.g. in the human erythrocyte [10].
Furthermore, recent data have demonstrated that the guanine
nucleotide exchange factor Epac is a cAMP-binding protein
[11], and that binding of cAMP modulates its activity. This
interaction potentially allows a crosstalk between cAMP
pathways and ras-mediated pathways in cell cycle control.
In addition to its many roles as an intracellular messenger,
cAMP also can act as an extracellular signalling molecule,
either directly, as in the aggregation ofthe slime mold
Dictyostelium discoideum [12], or indirectly via extracellu-
lar conversion into adenosine and the subsequent activation
of adenosine receptors in the brain [13].
In mammalian systems, the most extensively studied
downstream effector of cAMP is the cAMP-regulated
protein kinaseA (PKA) [14 –18]. According to the current
paradigm, PKA is an R
2
C
2
heterotetramer consisting of two
catalytic and two regulatory subunits. The regulatory
subunits contain a dimerization domain in their N-terminal
regions, followed by an autoinhibitor sequence that
resembles a PKA substrate. This region binds to the active
site ofthe catalytic subunit, inactivating it while it is in the
R
2
C
2
complex. The C-terminus oftheregulatory subunit
contains two adjacent cAMP-binding domains. Domain A is
not accessible for cAMP in the R
2
C
2
complex. cAMP first
binds to domain B, triggering a conformational change that
renders domain A more accessible. The two cAMP-binding
domains are biochemically distinct, both in terms of binding
kinetics and in their preference for substituted cAMP
analogs. The three-dimensional structure ofthe cAMP-
binding domain ofa bovine type I regulatorysubunit has
been determined [19]. Binding of cAMP to the regulatory
subunits releases the active catalytic subunits from the
complex. These proceed to phosphorylate a plethora of
proteins, among them transcription factors such as CREB
[20,21]. The current view is that most ofthe downstream
effects of cAMP in eukaryotic cells are mediated through
Note: a web site is available at
http://www.izb.unibe.ch/res/seebeck/sehome.html
Correspondence to T. Seebeck, Institute of Cell Biology,
University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 4, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Fax: 1 41 31 631 46 84, Tel.: 1 41 31 631 46 49,
E-mail: thomas.seebeck@izb.unibe.ch
(Received 27 June 2001, revised 20 September 2001, accepted
1 October 2001)
Abbreviations: PKA, proteinkinase A; cGMP, cyclic guanosine
monophosphate; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; cNMP,
cyclic nucleoside monophosphate; TbRSU, regulatorysubunit of
trypanosomal PKA.
Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 6197–6206 (2001) q FEBS 2001
the alteration of transcription via PKA-mediated phos-
phorylation of transcription factors. Interestingly, in at least
in some instances, the activity of mammalian PKA appears
to be stimulated by cGMP rather than by cAMP [22].
In the unicellular eukaryote Trypanosoma brucei, the
causative agent of human sleeping sickness in Africa, cAMP
signalling and its role in parasite proliferation and host/
parasite interaction are still poorly understood [23]. A large
number of genes coding for different adenylyl cyclases have
been identified [3,24], and one of these enzymes, GRESAG
4.4B, has been further characterized [25]. Also, several
cAMP-specific phosphodiesterases have recently been iden-
tified and characterized [26] (S. Kunz, P. Bern, A. Rascon,
S. H. Soderling and J. Beavo, personal communication;
A. Rascon and J. Beavo, personal communication,
University of Seattle, WA, USA). Little is currently known
about the biological role of cAMP signalling in these
organisms. A role for cAMP in the differentiation of long,
slender to short, stumpy forms in the bloodstream of the
mammalian host has been proposed [27]. PKA activity has
also been implicated in a mechanism by which T. brucei
can remove bound host antibody from its cell surface [28].
The enzyme itself has not yet been characterized in any of
the kinetoplastids, although previous work demonstrated the
presence ofa PKA-like kinase activity in T. cruzi [29].
The current study describes the identification and
characterization oftheregulatorysubunitof trypanosomal
PKA (TbRSU). Many ofthe structural features are well
conserved between TbRSU and its mammalian counterparts.
Despite this overall similarity between mammalian and
trypanosomal regulatory subunits, the trypanosomal homo-
log binds cGMP rather than cAMP, and the trypanosomal
PKA is activated by cGMP, but not by cAMP. TbRSU thus
represents yet another facet in the amazing kaleidoscope of
cyclic nucleotide signalling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Enzymes were obtained from Roche Diagnostics (Rotkreuz,
Switzerland), and culture media were purchased from Difco.
Radiochemicals were from Dupont-NEN (Regensdorf,
Switzerland), while chemicals were obtained from SIGMA
or Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Talonw immobilized-cobalt
resin was from Clontech (Basel, Switzerland). DNA
sequencing was outsourced to Microsynth GmbH, Balgach,
Switzerland where the reactions were run with BigDye
terminators (PE-Biosystems) and were analyzed on an ABI
Prism 377 instrument.
Cell culture
T. brucei strain 427 (derived form MiTat 15a), was grown as
procyclic forms at 27 8C in SDM medium [30]. Mono-
morphic bloodstream forms of strain 221 (MiTat 1.2) were
cultivated as described by Hesse et al. [31].
Drosophila Schneider 2 (S2) cells and expression vectors
were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells
were passaged at cell densities between 6 and
20 Â 10
6
mL
21
by splitting at a 1 : 2 to 1 : 5 dilution in
complete DES
TM
medium (Invitrogen) containing 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. S2 cells are density-
sensitive and do not proliferate when seeded at less than
5 Â 10
5
mL
21
. Cells were cultured in a 22– 24 8C incubator
with no extra CO
2
supplied. Cell viability was checked
using the Trypan Blue exclusion test and was routinely
found to be between 95 and 99%.
Transfection of S2 cells
S2 cells were prepared for transfection by seeding 3 Â 10
6
cells in 3 mL DES
TM
medium into a 35-mm Petri dish. The
culture was incubated at 24 8C until a cell density of
2–4 Â 10
6
mL
21
was reached (6– 16 h). Immediately
before transfection, the following two solutions were
prepared separately (per 35-mm dish). Tube A: 36 mL2
M
CaCl
2
and 19 mg vector DNA, in a final volume of 300 mL
H
2
O. Tube B: 300 mL50mM Hepes, pH 7.1, 1.5 mM
NaH
2
PO
4
, 280 mM NaCl. The contents of tube A were
added slowly (over 1–2 min) to tube B under continued
mixing. The final mixture was incubated at room
temperature for 30– 40 min to allow the precipitate to
form. The suspension was then well resuspended and added
dropwise to the medium ofthe cell culture. After incubation
for 16–24 h, cells were washed twice with medium to
remove the calcium-phosphate precipitate, suspended in
fresh growth medium, and further incubated. Expression of
the recombinant protein was induced by the addition of
15 mL 100 m
M CuSO
4
per 3 mL culture medium (final
concentration 500 m
M), and protein expression was assayed
12– 48 h after induction.
When stable cell lines were desired, the cells were
cotransfected with plasmid pCoHYGRO (Invitrogen) and
were selected for growth in 300 mg
:
mL
21
hygromycin B.
Preparation ofthe PKA-specific substrate
An expression plasmid coding for a 28-kDa His
6
-tagged
green fluorescent protein with aproteinkinaseA specific
phosphorylation sequence (GFP227-RRRRSII) at its
C-terminus was provided by K. Shokat, Princeton
University, NJ, USA [32]. The plasmid was transfected
into BL21DE, and positive colonies were identified by their
fluorescence under UV light. Liquid cultures were grown to
a D
595
of < 0.4 and were then induced for 4 h with 0.5 mM
isopropyl thio-b-D-galactoside. Cells were suspended in
1–2% ofthe original culture volume of ice-cold 50 m
M
sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, and were lysed
by sonication. The lysate was cleared by centrifugation for
20 min at 7000 g, and the recombinant protein was
adsorbed batchwise to Talonw immobilized-cobalt resin
(Invitrogen) and purified according to the manufacturer’s
protocol.
Immunoprecipitation
For the preparation of antibody-coated beads, protein
G–Sepharose beads (Amersham-Pharmacia) were washed
twice in NaCl/P
i
and then suspended as a 50% slurry in
100 m
M phosphate buffer, pH 8.2. Fifty-microliter aliquots
of this slurry were incubated for 1 –3 h at 4 8C in 500 mL
phosphate buffer containing the antibody to be coupled (rat
polyclonal antibody against TbRSU1 or a control polyclonal
rat antibody directed against an irrelevant protein). Beads
were then washed twice in 100 m
M phosphate buffer and
once in HB buffer (25 m
M Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl).
6198 T. Shalaby et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) q FEBS 2001
For immunoprecipitation, 2 Â 10
8
trypanosomes were
sedimented at 1300 g for 10 min and were washed twice in
ice-cold NaCl/P
i
(137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM
Na
2
HPO
4
, 1.4 mM KH
2
PO
4
, pH 7.3). The final pellet was
suspended in 240 mL HB buffer and 30 mL Completew
protease inhibitor mix (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
Thirty microliters lysis buffer (10% deoxycholate, 10%
NP40 in HB buffer) were added, and the mixture was
extensively vortexed. After 30 min incubation on ice,
the lysate was centrifuged for 5 min at 10 000 g at 4 8C.
200 mL ofthe supernatant was transferred to a fresh
tube containing 25 mL ofthe antibody-coated protein
G– Sepharose beads. The slurry was gently rocked for 1 h to
overnight at 4 8C. Beads were then washed on ice three
times with cold WBI buffer (0.5% NP 40, 0.05%
deoxycholate and 0.05% SDS in NaCl/P
i
, pH 7.5), twice
with cold WBII buffer (125 m
M Tris/HCl, pH 8.2, 500 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP40), and finally once with
500 mL kinase buffer (15 m
M NaCl, 5 mM MgCl
2
,10mM
Hepes, pH 7.5).
Protein kinase assay
For assaying proteinkinase activity in the immunoprecipi-
tates, the following reaction mix was prepared: 1 mL
[
32
P]gATP ( 5 mCi
:
mL
21
, 150 mM ATP), 4 mLof5Â kinase
buffer (75 m
M NaCl, 25 mM MgCl
2
,50mM Hepes,
pH 7.5), 1 mL kinase substrate (0.5–1 mg), further
additions as required, and H
2
O to a final volume of
20 mL. These 20 mL were added to 10 mLwashed
immunoprecipitation beads (corresponding to 2 Â 10
6
trypanosomes), and the suspension was incubated at 30 8C
for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of
5 mL5Â SDS sample buffer and boiling for 3 min.
Expression ofa recombinant GST–RSU fusion protein
A sequence fragment ofthe TbRSU gene recovered from the
T. brucei genome project at The Institute for Genetic
Research (TIGR) was used to design two PCR primers
(RSU-1, 5
0
-GAGAGTCGACGCTCAAGGTAGAAGGTA
CGG-3
0
, and RSU-2, 5
0
-AGACTCGAGCTACTTCCTCCC
CTCTGCCC-3
0
; added SalI and XhoI restriction sites
underlined, respectively). The expected 600-bp fragment
was amplified from genomic DNA of T. brucei, confirmed
by DNA sequencing and introduced into the multicloning
site ofthe expression vector pGEX-4T2 (Amersham-
Pharmacia). The vector was transformed into Escherichia
coli BL21DE and the recombinant protein was expressed in
high amounts in an insoluble form. Theprotein was
solubilized from the inclusion bodies in 100 m
M Tris/HCl,
pH 7.5, 5 m
M EDTA, 6 M urea. For renaturation, several
procedures were tried, all of which lead to soluble fusion
protein unable to bind to glutathione–Sepharose. Thus, the
fusion protein was purified by gel filtration on a Superdex
200 column, followed by gel electrophoresis. After blotting
the protein to nitrocellulose (Schleicher & Schuell BA 85),
the 50-kDa fusion protein band was excised, dissolved in
dimethylsulfoxide and used for immunization.
Expression of cNMP-binding domains in
Drosophila
S2
cells
For the expression ofthe cNMP-binding domains of
TbRSU1 in S2 cells, the respective gene fragments were
amplified and cloned into the pMT/V5-His B vector
(Invitrogen). In this vector, expression is regulated by a
metallothioneine promotor, and it allows induction of
expression by the addition of Cu
21
to the growth medium.
The recombinant proteins carry a V5 immunological tag and
a His
6
-tag at their C-termini, which allow for easy detection
and purification. The cNMP-binding domain A (amino acids
231–367) was amplified using primers Adom-F [5
0
-
TAT
ACTAGTATGG(2531)CACTCATCTTGAAGTTGT-3
0
,
added Spe I site and start codon, bold underlined] and
Adom-R [5
0
-TATCTCGAGA(2938rev)AGGCCACTGAG
GAAC-3
0
, added Xho I site underlined]. Domain B (amino
acids 352– 499) was amplified using primers Bdom-F
[5
0
-TATACTAGTATGC(2921)CGTTCCTCAGTGG-3
0
,
added SpeI site and start codon, bold underlined] and
Bdom-R [5
0
-TATCTCGAG(3334rev)CTTCCTCCCCT
CTG-3
0
, added XhoI site underlined]. For amplification of
the joint domains (amino acids 231–499), primers Adom-F
and Bdom-R were used. The PCR products were cloned into
the pGEM T-Easy vector, verified by DNA sequencing and
were finally subcloned into the expression vector pMT/
V5-His B.
Purification of recombinant cNMP-binding domains from
S2 Drosophila
cell
s
Cells were collected by centrifugation at 500 g for 5 min at
4 8C. The cell pellet was suspended in ice-cold lysis buffer
(50 mL per mL cell culture; 50 m
M Tris/HCl, pH 7.8,
150 m
M NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40; Completew protease
inhibitor cocktail was added immediately before use). The
lysate was incubated on ice for 20–30 min, briefly
homogenized in a glass/Teflon homogenizer and finally
centrifuged at 7000 g for 20 min at 2 8C. To the cleared
supernatant, 1/10 volume ofa 50% (v/v) suspension of
Talonw beads in NaCl/P
i
was added, and the suspension was
incubated on a rocking platform for 3 h at 4 8C. After
incubation, the suspension was poured into a small column
and was washed extensively with 50 m
M sodium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.0, 300 m
M NaCl. Recombinant protein was
finally eluted with four aliquots of 100 mL elution buffer (50
sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 300 m
M NaCl, 150 mM
imidazole). Theprotein containing fractions were pooled,
aliquoted, snap-frozen and stored at 270 8C.
Cyclic nucleotide binding assays
Binding assays were performed in 5 m
M sodium phosphate,
pH 6.8, 1 m
M EDTA, 25 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.2 mM
isobutyl-methyl-xanthine, 1.5 mg purified protein and
increasing concentrations of [
3
H]cGMP (NEN, catalogue
no. NET-337) adjusted to a specific activity of
1 mCi
:
nmol
21
. cAMP competition and kinetic experiments
were carried out in the presence of 0.4 m
M [
3
H]cGMP.
Initial experiments were carried out in the presence of
500 mg
:
mL
21
histone VIII-S, which increased the binding
efficiency by about 50%. Histone was omitted in later
experiments. The binding reactions were incubated on ice
q FEBS 2001 PKA regulatorysubunit from T. brucei (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) 6199
overnight. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 1 mL
ice cold 10 m
M sodium phosphate, pH 6.8, 1 mM EDTA and
were filtered immediately through prewetted Millipore
HAWP filters (0.45 m
M). Filters were rinsed three times
with 1 mL ice-cold buffer each, thoroughly dried and
counted in a toluene-based scintillator. Dissociation rate
constants were determined by overnight equilibration on ice
of the binding reaction containing 0.4 m
M [
3
H]cGMP. After
the addition ofa 100-fold excess of unlabelled cGMP,
aliquots were withdrawn and processed for filtration at time
points between 0 and 30 min. All reactions were done in
triplicate. Binding parameters were determined by curve
fitting using the
PRISM software package of GraphPad Inc.,
San Diego, CA, USA.
RESULTS
Identification of TbRSU1
The DNA database ofthe T. brucei genome project was
searched for predicted proteins containing putative cAMP-
binding domains. This search resulted in a 600-bp DNA
sequence which was predicted to code for the C-terminal
fragment ofaprotein with high similarity to the regulatory
subunits of eukaryotic PKAs. From the retrieved sequence,
PCR primers were designed (see Materials and methods)
and were used to amplify the corresponding fragment from
genomic DNA of T. brucei. The resulting PCR fragment of
600 bp was cloned and verified by sequencing. It was then
used to hybridize genomic blots of T. brucei DNA in order
to establish the number of corresponding genes present in
the genome. When genomic DNA was digested with
enzymes that did not cut within the DNA sequence of the
hybridization probe (Xho I, Stu I, Spe I, Pst I, Nhe I, Kpn I
and HindIII), all digests resulted in a single hybridizing
band (Fig. 1A), strongly indicating that the new gene,
TbRSU, is coded for by a single-copy gene. The 600-bp PCR
fragment was then used to screen a genomic library of
T. brucei in a lambda phage vector [33]. This screening
resulted in several independent phages containing the same
Fig. 1. TbRSU is a single-copy gene. (A) Digests of genomic DNA of
T. brucei were hybridized with a 600-bp PCR fragment representing the
conserved cNMP-binding domain of TbRSU. (B) Map ofthe TbRSU
locus. Nucleotides 1 – 483 code for the C-terminus ofaprotein of
unknown function (TbTAS ). Nucleotides 1838–3334 represent the open
reading frame of TbRSU. Nucleotides 3335– 3566 represent a part of the
3
0
untranslated region of TbRSU. The grey boxes designated A and B
represent the predicted cyclic nucleotide binding domains of the
TbRSU protein. The sequence has been deposited at GenBank under the
accession number AF326975.
Fig. 2. Gene and amino-acid sequence of TbRSU. The pseudosub-
strate sequence is indicated by the grey box. The two cyclic-nucleotide
binding domains A and B are boxed. Shaded boxes in domain A:
Glu311 (is Ala in all homologs, see Fig. 3); Thr318 (is Arg in all
homologs); Val319 (is Ala in cAMP and Thr in cGMP binding
domains). Shaded boxes in domain B: Glu435 (is Ala in all homologs);
Asn442 (is Arg in all homologs).
6200 T. Shalaby et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) q FEBS 2001
locus. A 3-kb Eco RI fragment was subcloned into
pBlueskriptSK1 and both strands were completely
sequenced. The sequence analysis demonstrated that this
fragment contained the entire open reading frame of the
TbRSU gene (Fig. 1B).
In parallel, a cDNA library of procyclic T. brucei was also
screened with the same PCR fragment, resulting in three
independent phages that all contained a 1500-bp cDNA
fragment. All three were sequenced and were shown to
contain a short 5
0
untranslated region, a complete open
reading frame of 1497 bp, and a 3
0
untranslated region
terminated by a polyA tract. Although all three cDNA
clones were terminated with this sequence, this polyA tract
probably does not represent the polyA tail ofthe mRNA
because a sequence of 12 adenosine residues following
T3566 was is present in a genomic clone ofthe T. brucei
genome project (accession number AQ 644384) that extends
beyond this region. The sequences ofthe open reading
frames of all three cDNAs were identical to that obtained
from the genomic fragment. Upstream ofthe TbRSU gene,
the 3
0
end of an open reading frame was identified
(nucleotides 1–486 ofthe genomic fragment), which coded
for an unidentified protein termed TbTAS. The stop codon of
this open reading frame is separated from the start codon of
TbRSU by 1352 bp, including a pyrimidine-rich region.
Predicted amino-acid sequence of TbRSU
The open reading frame of TbRSU predicts aproteinof 499
amino acids, with a calculated M
r
of 56 725 (Fig. 2).
Overall, theprotein shares extensive sequence homology
with mammalian PKA regulatory subunits type I. The
N-terminal domain of TbRSU (amino acids 1–242) is
longer than the N-termini of its mammalian homologs, and it
bears no identifiable functional domains. In analogy to
mammalian type I regulatory subunits, the cysteine residues
Cys15 and Cys67 may be involved in dimer formation,
although such dimers could not be detected in cell lysates
analysed by gel filtration chromatography (data not shown).
In these experiments, TbRSU always migrated as a
monomer. Residues 202–206 (-ArgArgThrThrVal-) rep-
resent the pseudo-inhibitor site which is involved in the
interaction with the catalytic domain [34]. Amino acids
243– 360 and 363–483 form the cyclic nucleotide binding
domains A and B, respectively. Based on the structural
model ofthe bovine regulatorysubunit RIa [17], Glu309
and Glu433 form a hydrogen bond with the 2
0
hydroxyl of
the ribose ofthe bound cNMP, while Leu310 and Leu434
interact with a nitrogen ofthe pyrimidine ring ofthe base.
Tyr370 and Tyr482 are probably the functional homologs of
Trp260 and Tyr371 in bovine RIa, allowing base-stacking
with the purine residue. Unexpectedly, a strongly conserved
arginine residue, which forms a hydrogen bond to the
phosphate group, is replaced by threonine (Thr318) and
asparagine (Asn442) in domains A and B, respectively
(Fig. 3). Sequencing errors or allelic variation at these sites
are unlikely as identical sequences have been obtained by
independent sequencing of TbRSU from different trypano-
some strains (accession nos AQ638897 and AF182823). A
further difference between TbRSU and the PKA regulatory
subunits from other eukaryotes is seen in Val319. All
cAMP-binding domains oftheregulatory subunits carry an
alanine residue at this position, while the closely related
cGMP-binding domains ofproteinkinase G always contain
either threonine or serine residues.
TbRSU
mRNA is more abundant in bloodstream forms
To explore if TbRSU is differentially expressed in the
different life stages of T. brucei, total RNA was extracted
both from bloodstream and from procyclic forms and was
analyzed by Northern blotting and hybridization. RNA
loading was quantitated by ethidium bromide staining to
visualize the ribosomal RNA before blotting the gel, and by
hybridization ofthe filter with a DNA probe specific for
b-tubulin [35]. The extent of hybridization of both probes
was quantitated using a PhosphorImager. TbRSU mRNA is
clearly detectable in both life cycle stages (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 3. Sequence comparison of cNMP-binding
domains of PKA regulatory subunits and of
protein kinase G. cNMP-binding domains A and
B are indicated by grey boxes. Amino-acid
numbering ofthe respective proteins is given. A:
Rattus norvegicus type I (accession number
P09456); B: D. melanogaster (P16905); C:
Caenorhabditis elegans (P30625); D:
D. discoideum (P05987); E: S. cerevisiae
(P07278); F: Schizosaccharomyces pombe
(P36600); G: TbRSU (AF326975); H:
Homo sapiens proteinkinase G (O13237); I:
D. melanogaster proteinkinase G (O03043).
Filled circles denote amino acids conserved in all
sequences. Open squares denote amino acids
which are conserved in all sequences, but differ in
TbRSU.
q FEBS 2001 PKA regulatorysubunit from T. brucei (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) 6201
However, the steady-state level of TbRSU mRNA in
blodstream forms is about five times higher than it is in
procyclic forms.
The TbRSU protein is present both in bloodstream and in
procyclic forms
To follow up the results ofthe Northern blotting experiments
on theprotein level, whole cell lysates were analyzed by
immunoblotting, using an affinity-purified polyclonal
antibody raised against recombinant TbRSU (see Materials
and methods). This polyclonal antibody not only recognizes
TbRSU in trypanosomes, but it also detects PKA regulatory
subunits in other organisms such as Saccharomyces
cerevisiae and mammalian cells (Fig. 4B). The TbRSU
protein is readily detectable both in bloodstream and in
procyclic forms, and it migrates as a single band ofa M
r
of
55 000, in agreement with its calculated M
r
of 56 726.
Similarly to what was observed with TbRSU mRNA, the
TbRSU protein is much more abundant in bloodstream than
in procyclic forms.
Co-immunoprecipitation of PKA with TbRSU
Sequence analysis clearly established TbRSU as a homolog
of the type I regulatory subunits of mammalian PKA. In
order to functionally verify if TbRSU is associated with a
kinase in vivo, TbRSU was immunoprecipitated from whole
cells lysates using the polyclonal rat antibody. Immunopre-
cipitates were first analyzed by immunoblotting with a
polyclonal rabbit antibody against the catalytic subunit of
bovine PKA. In these experiments, the antibody detected a
protein with a M
r
of about 40 000, suggesting that the
catalytic subunitof trypanosomal PKA does in fact
coprecipitate with TbRSU. Inspection ofthe T. brucei
databases identified several DNA sequences that code for a
homolog ofa PKA catalytic subunit. The catalytic activity
of the immunoprecipitates was then analysed by incubation
in kinase reaction buffer in the presence or absence of a
recombinant PKA-specific substrate [32] and 20 m
M cAMP.
Analysis ofthe reaction products by gel electrophoresis and
autoradiography (Fig. 5) demonstrated that the coimmuno-
precipitates did indeed contain akinase activity which
phosphorylated the PKA-specific substrate. No phosphoryl-
ation ofthe substrate was observed when either no antibody,
or an irrelevant antibody, was used for immunoprecipitation,
or when the TbRSU antibody was used in the absence of cell
lysate. Unexpectedly, the addition of 20 m
M cAMP to the
reactions did not stimulate thekinase activity, but had either
Fig. 4. TbRSU is more abundant in bloodstream than in procyclic
forms. (A) Northern blot analysis. Ten-microgram aliquots of total
RNA of procyclic (PC) or bloodstream form (BSF) trypanosomes were
loaded per slot. After transfer, the filter was successively hybridized
with a TbRSU probe (a) and a probe for b-tubulin (b). After
electrophoresis, the gel was stained with ethidium bromide to control
for equal loading (c). (B) Hybridization was quantified using a
PhosphorImager. (a) Hybridization with TbRSU; (b) hybridization with
a b-tubulin probe. Grey bars, procyclics; black bars, bloodstream forms.
(C) Immunoblot analysis. (a) The polyclonal antibody raised against
recombinant TbRSU recognizes homologs in a wide spectrum of
species. 1, Whole cell lysate from E. coli expressing the GST– TbRSU
fusion protein used for raising the antibody; 2, whole cell lysate of
T. brucei; 3, whole cell lysate of S. cerevisiae; 4, whole cell lysate of
COS (monkey) cells. (b) Immunoblot of equivalent amounts of whole
cell lysates of bloodstream (B) and procyclic (P) trypanosomes.
Molecular mass markers are indicated for each panel.
Fig. 5. The TbRSU antibody coimmunoprecipitates a protein
kinase activity which phosphorylates a PKA-specific substrate.
Protein kinase activity assays of immunoprecipitates. (Top) Coomassie-
stained gels, molecular mass markers are IgG heavy chain (50 kDa) and
the PKA substrate (30 kDa); (bottom) corresponding autoradiographs,
arrowheads indicate the position ofthe PKA substrate. (A)
Immunoprecipitation with no antibody; (B) immunoprecipitation with
TbRSU antibody; (C) immunoprecipitation with irrelevant antibody
(against the phosphodiesterase TbPDE1; S. Kunz, personnal communi-
cation); (D) immunoprecipitation with TbRSU antibody, but without
cell lysate. Beads were incubated for activity assays as follows: lanes 1:
kinase buffer; lanes 2: kinase buffer plus 20 m
M cAMP; lanes 3: kinase
buffer plus PKA-substrate; lanes 4: kinase buffer plus PKA-substrate
plus 20 m
M cAMP
6202 T. Shalaby et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) q FEBS 2001
no effect or inhibited it. While the absence of stimulation by
cAMP was consistent in all ofthe many independent
experiments carried out (see also below), the inhibitory
effect of cAMP was observed in some, but not in all
experiments.
Phosphorylation ofthe PKA-specific substrate by the
immunoprecipitates was time-dependent, Mg
21
-dependent
and was quenched by an excess of unlabelled ATP (data
not shown). These results demonstrated that a protein
kinase activity was coimmunoprecipitated with TbRSU
under our conditions. Phosphorylation ofthe PKA-specific
substrate by this activity suggested that it represented PKA.
This was further corroborated by the observation that
the co-immunoprecipitating kinase activity was inhibited
by the highly PKA-specific peptide inhibitor PKI [36]
(Fig. 6).
PKA activity is stimulated by cGMP, but not by cAMP
When kinase activity of TbRSU immunoprecipitates was
assayed in the presence or absence of 20 m
M cAMP, no
stimulation of phosphorylation ofthe PKA-specific
substrate could be detected. In contrast, control reactions
using mammalian COS cell lysates precipitated by the
same antibody, exhibited the expected stimulation of
kinase activity by cAMP (Fig. 7A). This unexpected
absence of stimulation of trypanosomal PKA activity by
cAMP was consistently observed over many independent
experiments (see above). However, when similar
experiments were performed with cGMP instead of
cAMP, a marked stimulation ofkinase activity was
consistently observed (Fig. 7B–D). The phosphorylation
reactions followed a similar time course in the presence
and in the absence of cGMP (Fig. 7B), but the overall
kinase activity was stimulated threefold to fourfold by
cGMP. Thekinase reaction was stimulated to a
similar extent in immunoprecipitates from procyclic and
bloodstream form trypanosomes (Fig. 7C,D), with maxi-
mum stimulation reached around 20 m
M cGMP. These
unexpected findings suggested that the trypanosomal
TbRSU, in contrast to its homologs in all other
eukaryotes analysed so far, is activated by cGMP rather
than by cAMP.
cGMP binding to the cyclic nucleotide binding domains A
and B sites of TbRSU
In order to directly confirm if TbRSU does in fact bind
cGMP, expression ofthe recombinant domains was
attempted in E. coli. Expression of domain B alone
produced ample recombinant protein, but all in insoluble
form. Expression ofthe combined A and B domains resulted
in much less protein (all insoluble). Expression of domain A
alone proved impossible, despite much effort, in agreement
with earlier observations that this domain is highly toxic for
E. coli [37]. Thus, domains A and B were expressed
individually in the Drosophila cell line S2, under the control
of a Cu
21
-inducible metallothionein promoter. Similarly to
what was observed in E. coli, domain B was well expressed,
while domain A again resulted in very poor cell growth and
in low amounts of recombinant protein. The individual
domains A and B were purified by cobalt-affinity
chromatography, and were assayed for cGMP binding
Fig. 6. PKI inhibits the activity of coimmunoprecipitating kinase.
Immunoprecipitates were incubated for 10 min under phosphorylation
conditions with PKA substrate in the presence or absence of PKI
inhibitor peptide (10 mg per 30 mL reaction mix). (A) autoradiogram of
PKA substrate; (B) Coomassie-stained PKA substrate; (C) Phosphor-
Imager analysis ofthe gel shown in (A).
Fig. 7. Thekinase activity which coimmunoprecipitates with
TbRSU is stimulated by cGMP, but not by cAMP. (A) Whole cell
lysates from mammalian COS cells and from T. brucei were
immunoprecipitated with antibody against TbRSU, and the immuno-
precipitates were assayed for PKA activity in the presence or absence of
20 m
M cAMP. (B) Time course ofkinase activity of immunoprecipitates
from T. brucei in the presence (grey boxes) or absence (white boxes) of
cGMP. (C and D) Effect of increasing cGMP concentrations on the
kinase activity of immunoprecipitates (autoradiographs). (C
0
and D
0
)
Coomassie stained PKA substrate. bl, blank reaction incubated in the
presence of 20 m
M cGMP, but without protein substrate. (C and C
0
)
procyclics; (D and D
0
) bloodstream forms.
q FEBS 2001 PKA regulatorysubunit from T. brucei (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) 6203
(Fig. 8). Both domains exhibited very similar K
d
values for
cGMP (domain A: 7.51 ^ 1.97 m
M, n ¼ 3; domain B:
11.43 ^ 2.24 m
M, n ¼ 3). For both domains, cAMP did
not measurably compete with cGMP binding up to a
100-fold excess of cAMP over cGMP. Dissociation rate
constants for cGMP were also very similar between the two
domains (domain A 0.24 min
21
, n ¼ 3, and domain B
0.36 ^ 0.18 min
21
, n ¼ 3).
DISCUSSION
The current study reports the identification ofthe regulatory
subunit of PKA from the parasitic protozoon T. brucei,
TbRSU. Several previous attempts to purify the PKA
holoenzyme from this organism had failed, although an
activity resembling the catalytic subunit could be identified
[29]. Similarly, attempts in several laboratories, including
our own, to demonstrate cAMP-specific protein phosphoryl-
ation in T. brucei were unsuccessful. TbRSU was
originally identified by searching ofthe T. brucei sequence
databases for putative cAMP-binding proteins. The full
gene was then isolated by screening genomic and
cDNA libraries. Sequence analysis demonstrated that
TbRSU is closely related to the mammalian type I
PKA regulatory subunits, with the only major difference
being the significantly longer N-terminus ofthe trypanoso-
mal protein.
The two cyclic nucleotide binding domains exhibit
sequence similarities with both the cAMP-binding domains
of the PKA regulatory subunits from yeast to mammals, as
well as with the cGMP-binding domains ofprotein kinase
G. Unexpectedly, one absolutely conserved arginine residue
in each ofthe two domains is replaced by Thr318 and
Asn442 in TbRSU. In the bovine regulatory subunit, and by
inference also in all its homologs, these arginine residues
form a hydrogen bond to the phosphate group ofthe bound
nucleotide [19]. Sequencing errors can be ruled out as a
simple reason for this variation, as this region was
independently sequenced by three different laboratories
using different trypanosome strains. The functional
implication of this amino-acid substitution remains to be
explored. Eight amino acids before Thr318 and Asn442,
another amino-acid substitution peculiar to TbRSU has
occurred: Glu311 and Glu435 replace otherwise invariant
alanine residues. Thirdly, Val319 represents another
substitution that sets TbRSU apart from its homologs. At
the equivalent position, the other PKA regulatory domains
contain an alanine residue while protein kinases G contain
serine or threonine. The hydroxyl side chain of either one of
these residues interacts with the C2 amino group of cGMP
and is essential for full activation of cGMP dependent
protein kinases [38].
The gene encoding TbRSU is expressed both in the
bloodstream and in the procyclic forms ofthe parasite, but at
much higher levels in the bloodstream form. The TbRSU
protein levels in both life cycle stages closely correspond to
the mRNA levels.
Immunoprecipitation of TbRSU consistently coprecipi-
tated aproteinkinase activity exhibiting many character-
istics ofthe catalytic subunitof trypanosomal PKA. The
coprecipitated kinase is recognized by an antibody
against the bovine PKA catalytic subunit, the enzyme
phosphorylates a PKA-specific substrate [32], and its
activity is strongly inhibited by the rabbit PKI inhibitor
peptide [36].
While theproteinkinase activity recovered in the
immunoprecipitates exhibited all the characteristics of a
canonical PKA catalytic subunit, no stimulation by cAMP
could be detected. On the contrary, cAMP appeared to
inhibit theproteinkinase activity in some, but not all,
experiments. Surprisingly, a marked stimulation of protein
kinase activity was consistently found with cGMP. This
stimulation was concentration-dependent, reaching its
maximum at < 20 m
M cGMP. The interaction of TbRSU
with cyclic nucleotides was further investigated using the
recombinant cNMP-binding domains A and B. Both
domains did bind cGMP with K
d
values in the low
micromolar range (7.5 and 11.4 m
M, respectively). This
value is unexpectedly high when compared to the K
d
values
determined for cAMP of mammalian PKA regulatory
subunits (1.2 and 1.7 n
M for domains A and B, respectively
[39]). However, the results are in good agreement with the
PKA activation experiments presented in this study, which
exhibited a maximal activation ofthekinase at about 20 m
M
cGMP. This value is almost 200-fold higher than the
apparent activation constant of mammalian PKA (120 n
M;
[17]). Binding of cGMP was not affected by cAMP, up to an
excess of at least 100-fold. Again, the results agree well with
the observations that thekinase activity was not stimulated
by cAMP at concentrations of up to 20 m
M. In marked
contrast to the mammalian regulatorysubunit where the two
domains differ considerably in their dissociation rate
constants (0.15 min
21
vs. 0.04 min
21
[17]), both domains
of TbRSU behave very similarly (0.24 min
21
for domain A
and 0.36 min
21
for domain B).
The observation that proteinkinaseA in T. brucei (and
probably also in other kinetoplastids) is regulated by cGMP
rather than by cAMP implies that cGMP has an important
signalling role in this group of organisms. Earlier work had
demonstrated the presence of cGMP in T. cruzi [40], and
several members ofa family of recently identified cAMP-
specific phosphodiesterases of T. brucei [26] (A. Rascon,
S. H. Soderling & J. Beavo, personal communication)
contain one or two GAF-domains [41] that may be involved
in cGMP binding. While these phosphodiesterases may
represent an interconnection between the cAMP- and the
cGMP-signalling pathways in T. brucei, the cGMP-regu-
lated TbRSU/PKA kinase may well represent the major
effector of cGMP signalling in these organisms.
Fig. 8. The cNMP-binding domains of TbRSU bind cGMP, but not
cAMP. Saturation binding ofof cGMP to recombinant domains A and B
of TbRSU. Data represent one of three very similar experiments.
6204 T. Shalaby et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) q FEBS 2001
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Kevin Shokat (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ,
USA) for providing his plasmid for the expression of recombinant PKA
substrate, to Brian Hemmings (Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel) for
his generous supply of antibody against bovine heart PKA catalytic
subunit, and to Ursula Kurath and Erwin Studer for producing the
trypanosomes. Special thanks go to Min Ku for her careful reading of
the manuscript, and to Michael Boshart (Free University, Berlin) for
communicating unpublished results and for stimulating discussions.
This work was supported by grants 31-046760.96 and 31-058927.99 of
the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant C98.0060 of COST
program B9 ofthe European Union, and by the UNDP/World Bank/
WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical
Diseases
REFERENCES
1. Hurley, J.H. (1998) The adenylyl and guanylyl cyclase superfamily.
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 770–777.
2. Chen, Y., Cann, M.J., Litvin, T.N., Iourgenko, V., Sinclair, M.J.,
Livin, L.R. & Buck, J. (2000) Soluble adenylyl cyclase as an
evolutionarily conserved bicarbonate sensor. Science 289,
625–628.
3. Naula, C. & Seebeck, T. (2000) Cyclic AMP signaling in
trypanosomatids. Parasitol. Today 16, 35–38.
4. Nikawa, J., Sass, P. & Wigler, M. (1987) Cloning and
characterization ofthe low-affinity cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase
gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 3629– 3636.
5. Sass, P., Field, J., Nikawa, J., Toda, T. & Wigler, M. (1986) Cloning
and characterization ofthe high-affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase
of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83,
9303–9307.
6. Imamura, R., Yamanaka. K., Ogura, T., Hiraga, S., Fujita, N.,
Ishihama, A. & Niki, H. (1996) Identification ofthe cpdA gene
encoding cyclic 3
0
5
0
-adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase
in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25423–25429.
7. Kraus-Friedman, N. (2000) Cyclic nucleotide gated channels in
non-sensory organs. Cell Calcium 27, 127–138.
8. Broillet, M.C. & Firestein, S. (1999) Cyclic nucleotide-gated
channels. Molecular mechanisms of activation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.
868, 730–740.
9. Clapham, D. (1998) Not so funny anymore: pacing channels are
cloned. Neuron 21, 5–7.
10. Schultz, C., Vaskinn, S., Kidalsen, H. & Sager, G. (1998) Cyclic
AMP stimulates the cyclic GMP egression pump in human
erythrocytes: effects of probenecid, verapamil, progesterone,
theophylline, IBMX, forskolin and cyclic AMP on cyclic GMP
uptake and association to inside-out vesicles. Biochemistry 37,
1161–1166.
11. De Rooji, J., Zwartkruis, F.J.T., Verhekgen, M.H.G., Cool, R.H.,
Nijman, S.M.B., Witinghofer, A. & Bos, J.L. (1998) Epac is a Rap1
guanine nucleotide exchange factor directly activated by cyclic
AMP. Nature 396, 474–477.
12. Weeks, G. (2000) Signalling molecules involved in cellular
differentiation during Dictyostelium morphogenesis. Curr. Opin.
Microbiol. 3, 625–639.
13. Rosenberg, P.A. & Li, Y. (1995) Adenylyl cyclase activation
underlies intracellular cyclic AMP accumulation, cyclic AMP
transport, and extracellular adenosine accumulation evoked by
beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation in mixed cultures of neurons
and astrocytes derived from rat cerebral cortex. Brain Res. 692,
227–232.
14. Taylor, S.S., Radzio-Andzelm, E., Madhusudan, A., Cheng, X., Ten
Eyck, L. & Narayana, N. (1999) Catalytic subunitof cyclic AMP
dependent protein kinase: structure and dynamics ofthe active site
cleft. Pharmacol. Ther. 82, 133 –141.
15. Francis, S.H. & Corbin, J.D. (1999) Cyclic nucleotide-dependent
protein kinase: intracellular receptors for cAMP and cGMP action.
Crit. Rev. Lab. Sci. 36, 275–328.
16. Thevelein, J.M. & de Winde, J.H. (1999) Novel sensing
mechanisms and targets for the cAMP-protein kinaseA pathway
in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 33,
904–918.
17. Francis, S.H. & Corbin, J.D. (1994) Structure and function of cyclic
nucleotide-dependent protein kinases. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 56,
237–272.
18. Taylor, S.S., Buechler, J.A. & Yonemoto, W. (1990) cAMP-
dependent protein kinase: framework for a diverse family of
regulatory enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59, 971–1005.
19. Su, Y., Dostmann, W.R.G., Herberg, F.W., Durick, K., Xuong,
N.H., Ten Eyck, L., Taylor, S.S. & Varughese, K.I. (1995)
Regulatory subunitofproteinkinase A: structure of deletion mutant
with cAMP binding domains. Science 269, 807–813.
20. De Cesare, D. & Sassone-Corsi, P. (2000) Transcriptional
regulation by cyclic AMP-responsive factors. Prog. Nucleic Acid
Res. Mol. Biol. 64, 343–369.
21. Shaywitz, A.J. & Greenberg, M.E. (1999) CREB: a stimulus-
induced transcription factor activated by a diverse array of
extracellular signals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 821 – 861.
22. Forte, L.R., Thorne, P.K., Eber, S.L., Krause, W.J., Freeman. R.H.,
Francis, S.H. & Corbin, J.D. (1992) Stimulation of intestinal
Cl-transport by heat-stable enterotoxin: activation of cAMP
dependent proteinkinase by cGMP. Am. J. Physiol. 263,
C607–C615.
23. Seebeck, T., Gong, K.W., Kunz, S., Schaub, R., Shalaby, T. &
Zoraghi, R. (2001) cAMP signalling in T. brucei. Int. J. Parasitol.
31, 491–498.
24. Alexandre, S., Paindovoine, P., Hanocq-Quertier, J., Paturiaux-
Hanocq, F., Tebabi, P. & Pays, E. (1996) Families of adenylate
cyclase genes in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 77,
173–182.
25. Naula, C., Schaub, R., Leech, V., Melville, S. & Seebeck, T. (2001)
Spontaneous dimerization and leucine-zipper induced activation of
the recombinant catalytic domain ofa new adenylyl cyclase,
GRESAG4.4B. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 112, 19 – 28.
26. Zoraghi, R., Kunz, S., Gong, K.W. & Seebeck, T. (2001)
Characterization of TbPDE2A, a novel cyclic nucleotide specific
phosphodiesterase from the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma
brucei. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11559–11566.
27. Vassella, E., Reuner, B., Yutzy, B. & Boshart, M. (1997)
Differentiation of African trypanosomes is controlled by a density
sensing mechanism which signals cell cycle arrest via the cAMP
pathway. J. Cell Sci. 110, 2661 –2671.
28. O’Beirne, C., Lowry, C.M. & Voorheis, H.P. (1998) Both IgM and
IgG anti-VSG antibodies initiate a cycle of aggregation-
disaggregation of bloodstream forms ofTrypanosoma brucei
without damage to the parasite. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 91,
165–193.
29. Ochatt, C.M., Ulloa, R.M., Torres, H.N. & Tellez. Inon, M.T.
(1993) Characterization ofthe catalytic subunitof Trypanosoma
cruzi cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. Mol. Biochem.
Parasitol. 57, 73 –81.
30. Brun, R. & Scho
¨
nenberger, M. (1979) Cultivation and in vitro
cloning of procyclic culture forms ofTrypanosomabrucei in a
semi-defined medium. Acta Tropica 36, 289– 292.
31. Hesse, F., Selzer, P.M., Mu
¨
hlstadt, K. & Duszenko, M. (1995) A
novel cultivation technique for long-term maintenance of blood-
stream form trypanosomes in vitro. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 70,
157–166.
32. Yang, F., Liu, Y., Bixby, S.D., Friedman, J.D. & Shokat, K. (1999)
Highly efficient green fluorescent protein-based kinase substrates.
Anal. Biochem. 266, 167–173.
33. Schla
¨
ppi, K., Deflorin, J. & Seebeck, T. (1989) The major
q FEBS 2001 PKA regulatorysubunit from T. brucei (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) 6205
component ofthe paraflagellar rod ofTrypanosomabrucei is a
helical protein that is encoded by two identical, tandemly linked
genes. J.Cell Biol. 109, 1695 –1709.
34. Zetterqvist, O. & Ragnarsson, U. (1982) The structural require-
ments of substrates of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. FEBS
Lett. 139, 287–290.
35. Seebeck, T., Whittaker, P.A., Imboden, M.A., Hardman, N. &
Braun, R. (1983) Tubulin genes ofTrypanosoma brucei: a tightly
clustered family of alternating genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80,
4634–4638.
36. Cheng, H.C., Kemp, B.E., Pearson, R.B., Smith, A.J., Misconi, L.,
Van Patten, S.M. & Walsh, D.A. (1986) A potent synthetic peptide
inhibitor ofthe cAMP-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem.
261, 989–992.
37. Gosse, M.E., Padmanabhan, A., Fleischmann, R.D. & Gottesmann,
M.M. (1993) Expression of Chinese hamster cAMP-dependent
protein kinase in Escherichia coli results in growth inhibition of
bacterial cells: a model system for the rapid screening of mutant
type I regulatory subunits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90,
8159–8163.
38. Taylor, M.K. & Uhler, M.D. (2000) The amino-terminal cyclic
nucleotide binding site ofthe type II cGMP-dependent protein
kinase is essential for full cyclic nucleotide-dependent activation.
J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28053–28062.
39. Døskeland, S.O., Øgreid, D., Ekanger, R.E., Sturm, P.A., Miller,
J.P. & Suva, R.H. (1983) Mapping ofthe two intrachain cyclic
nucleotide binding sites of adenosine cyclic 3
0
,5
0
-dependent protein
kinase I. Biochemistry 22, 1094–1101.
40. Paveto, C., Pereira, C., Espinosa, J., Montagna, A.E., Farber, M.,
Esteva, M., Flawia, M.M. & Torres, H.N. (1995) The nitric oxide
transduction pathway in Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Biol. Chem. 270,
16576–16579.
41. Ho, Y.S., Burden, L.M. & Hurley, J.H. (2000) Structure ofthe GAF
domain, a ubiquitous signaling motif and a new class of cyclic
GMP receptor. EMBO J. 19, 5288–5299.
6206 T. Shalaby et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 268) q FEBS 2001
. least in some instances, the activity of mammalian PKA appears to be stimulated by cGMP rather than by cAMP [22]. In the unicellular eukaryote Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of human sleeping. The regulatory subunit of a cGMP-regulated protein kinase A of Trypanosoma brucei Tarek Shalaby, Matthias Liniger and Thomas Seebeck{ Institute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Switzerland This. regulatory subunits, the trypanosomal homo- log binds cGMP rather than cAMP, and the trypanosomal PKA is activated by cGMP, but not by cAMP. TbRSU thus represents yet another facet in the amazing