Báo cáo khoa học: DNA-binding and transcription characteristics of three cloned sigma factors from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) suggest overlapping and distinct roles in plastid gene expression doc

Eur J Biochem 270, 1288–1300 (2003) Ó FEBS 2003 doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03494.x DNA-binding and transcription characteristics of three cloned sigma factors from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) suggest overlapping and distinct roles in plastid gene expression Anke Homann and Gerhard Link Plant Cell Physiology and Molecular Biology, University of Bochum, Germany We have isolated and studied the cloned sigma factors SASIG1-3 from mustard (Sinapis alba) In functional analyses using both promoter and factor mutants, the three recombinant proteins all had similar basic properties but also revealed differences in promoter preference and requirements for single nucleotide positions Directed mutagenesis of SASIG1 identified critical residues within the conserved regions 2.4 and 4.2 necessary for binding of the )10 and )35 promoter elements, respectively SASIG1 and 2, but not SASIG3, each have a typical region 2.5 for binding of the extended )10 promoter element SASIG3 has a prosequence reminiscent of rK from Bacillus subtilis, suggesting that proteolytic cleavage from an inactive precursor is involved in the regulation of plastid transcription In addition, SASIG2 was found to be more abundant in lightgrown as compared to dark-grown mustard seedlings, while the converse was true for SASIG3 Chloroplasts contain the photosynthetic machinery, which is built-up and maintained by gene-regulatory mechanisms both inside and outside the organelle At the level of transcription this involves the participation of multiple RNA polymerases, at least two of which are located within the plastid compartment: (a) a single-subunit type enzyme related to those of T-odd phages and mitochondria; and (b) a multisubunit form resembling those of bacteria and eukaryotic nuclei (reviewed in [1]) The former is a product of nuclear gene(s) (nuclear-encoded phage-type plastid RNA polymerase; NEP); the latter, which is the primary enzyme for transcription of photosynthesis-related chloroplast genes [2], contains an organelle-encoded core of eubacterial a, b, and b¢ homologues [3] and hence has been termed PEP [4] The catalytic core of the PEP enzyme assembles with regulatory proteins that have been identified as functional equivalents of bacterial sigma factors and hence named SLFs (sigma-like factors) (reviewed in [5]) Given the central role of sigma in prokaryotic transcription initiation [6,7], and considering the endosymbiotic origin of chloroplasts [8], one might expect coding information for sigma-like protein(s) on plastid DNA However, extensive sequence analysis has shown this not to be the case [3], suggesting that the SLFs might be nuclear gene products Direct evidence for this was obtained by the cloning of sigma-like cDNA sequences from algae [9,10] followed by those from several higher plants (reviewed in [11]) Our previous work on chloroplast transcription in mustard (Sinapis alba) had resulted in the purification and biochemical characterization of three SLFs [12,13] As part of our efforts to clarify the role of this transcription factor family, we reported on the cloning of a first member, which we referred to as SASIG1 [14] Here we present SASIG2 and SASIG3, and we describe functional studies with all three recombinant factors Correspondence to G Link, Plant Cell Physiology and Molecular Biology, University of Bochum, Universitaetsstr 150, D-44780 Bochum, Germany Fax: +49 234 3214 188, Tel.: +49 234 322 5495, E-mail: gerhard.link@ruhr-uni-bochum.de Abbreviations: EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; HTH, helix-turn-helix; NEP, nuclear-encoded phage-type plastid RNA polymerase; PEP, bacterial-type plastid RNA polymerase with core subunits encoded by organellar genes; SLFs, sigma-like factors Enzyme: DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (EC 2.7.7.6) (Received 19 November 2002, revised 23 January 2003, accepted February 2003) Keywords: plastid; promoter; RNA polymerase; sigma factor; transcription Materials and methods PCR and cDNA cloning Oligonucleotides were derived from expressed sequence tags with sequence similarity to the coding regions of the AtSig2 and AtSig3 genes from Arabidopsis thaliana (GenBank accession numbers AC003981 and N97044) Two pairs, 5¢-GAGAAACAAGTGATACGTTGGA GA-3¢ and 5¢-TTTCCTGAATGCAGATGACTCTAT-3¢ from AtSig2 and 5¢-GTAGAGATGAACTGGTGAA AAGCA-3¢ and 5¢-AAAACTTGTAACCCCTTGTGT GAT-3¢ from AtSig3, were used for PCR-amplification from total S alba DNA The products were cloned into the EcoRV site of pBluescript (Stratagene), resulting in plasmids pBS/3C1Sig2 and pBS/4B2Sig3 The inserts were used for screening of a HybriZAP cDNA library [14] Clones pAD/3C1Sig2 and pAD/4B2Sig3 contained the full-length SaSig2 and SaSig3 cDNAs, respectively Ó FEBS 2003 Recombinant plastid sigma factors (Eur J Biochem 270) 1289 Isolation of proteins and Western blot analysis Mustard (S alba) seedlings were grown at 25 °C for days either under continuous light (250 lmol photonsỈm)2Ỉs)1) or in the dark Cotyledons were harvested and whole-cell or plastid proteins were prepared as described [15,16] Bacterially expressed recombinant proteins were isolated from inclusion bodies, followed by SDS/PAGE The gel-purified proteins were used as antigens in a custom protocol for rabbit immunization (Eurogentec) For Western analysis, protein samples were separated by SDS/PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane Proteins were incubated with anti-SASIG2 and anti-SASIG3 antisera, respectively, and detected by nitroblue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro3-indolylphosphate Cloned fragments of mustard chloroplast DNA [5,14,17] Plasmid pSA05/H120 carries the psbA promoter (accession no X04826); the 120-bp HinfI insert (H120) covers 68 bp upstream of the transcription start site and 52 bp noncoding 5¢-sequence of the gene A 450-bp EcoRI–HindIII fragment that carries the trnK (X04826) promoter was prepared from pSA364-EH450, a pSPT18-based derivative of pSA364 Bam0.5, the 460-bp BamHI fragment of pSA364-B0.5, represents intron sequences of the split trnK gene (X04826) Plasmid pSA364-ET0.2 contains the trnQ (X13558) promoter and flanking sequences in pSPT19 The 213-bp fragment resulting from cleavage by EcoRI and TaqI covers 56 bp downstream of the transcription start site The pUC13-based plasmid pSA364-H018 carries the rps16 (X13609) promoter; its 188-bp HinfI insert extends 107 bp downstream of the transcription start point The rbcL plasmid pBS1.4E/P (X73284) was constructed by cloning a 1.4-kb EcoRI–PstI fragment of pSA530 into pBSIISK Using BamHI and HindIII digestion, an  500-bp subfragment containing the rbcL promoter and flanking sequences (164 bp downstream of the transcription start site) was generated Plasmid pBS-1.7kb-B, including the promoter and both coding and noncoding regions of the ycf3 gene (AJ242660), was cleaved with DdeI and EcoRV; this resulted in a 273-bp fragment that covered 158 bp downstream of the ycf3 transcription start The 205-bp insert of pBSKS/205TD carries the region upstream of the rrn16 gene (X04182) that contains the P1, PC and P2 promoters [3] All DNA fragments specified above were used as unlabelled competitors in electrophoretic mobility shift DNA binding assays (EMSA) In addition, the H120 fragment that carries the psbA promoter was used as a labelled probe and for construction of point mutants, and the EcoRI-linearized pSA05/H120 served as a transcription template (see below) The DNA fragments that carry mustard chloroplast promoters are summarized in Table and details of the promoters are depicted in Figure 5A and 6A Bacterial expression and purification of recombinant factors The SaSig1–3 cDNAs lacking the transit peptide region were each cloned in pQE30 (Qiagen) A truncated SaSig3 construct was made by using the PCR primers 5¢-CACA CAAGGGGTTACAAGTTCTCCACG-3¢ and 5¢-ACCA GCCAATTGGTTCCAAAAATCTATCT-3¢ and ligation into pQE31 (Qiagen) Following transformation of M15, the recombinant proteins were purified on Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose columns (Qiagen) Gel shift DNA-binding assays Recombinant sigma factors were incubated with 2.5 ng P-labelled H120 fragment and 0.5 lg E coli core RNA polymerase in 50 lL of 30 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.0, mM b-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 5% (v/v) glycerol for 10 at 25 °C DNA–protein complexes were analysed on a native 5% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel (29 : acrylamide/ bisacrylamide) containing 0.5 M Tris/HCl pH 8.8 The gel was dried and then analysed using a Fuji BAS 2040phosphoimager Unlabelled DNA fragments representing various chloroplast promoters were prepared as summarized in Table These fragments were used in competition EMSA (Fig 5) Likewise, psbA promoter fragments carrying point mutations were used as competitors (Fig 6) 32 Mutagenesis of the psbA promoter The cloned 120-bp HinfI region containing the psbA promoter [5] (see Table 1) was used as the starting material for the construction of promoter point mutants M-19 A/G, M-21 A/T, M-22 T/A, M-23 A/T and M-34 T/C were obtained by the M13-based technique previously described [18] All other point mutants were made by PCR using the QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) Both the length and sequence outside the changed position were confirmed to be identical for each mutant fragment Mutagenesis and expression of SASIG1-300Q/H and SASIG1-455R/H SASIG1 mutants were constructed by using the QuickChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) Primers for the substitutions 300Q/H and 455R/H were 5¢-TATACTGG TGGATTCGACACGGTGTGTCAAGAGCATTAG-3¢ and 5¢-GAGAGAGAGGGTTCATCAGGTGGGGCTT GTGG-3¢, respectively The fragments were cloned into the BamHI/SalI sites of pMAL-c2x (NEB) The bacterially Table Cloned DNA fragments containing mustard chloroplast promoters Plasmids were digested using the indicated restriction enzymes DNA fragments were gel-purified and then tested in competition EMSA experiments as described in Materials and methods Gene Fragment size (bp) Restriction enzyme(s) used Portion downstream of transcription start (bp) psbA trnK trnQ rps16 rbcL ycf3 rrn16 120 450 213 188 500 273 205 HinfI EcoRI/HindIII EcoRI/TaqI HinfI BamHI/HindIII DdeI/EcoRV DdeI/TaqI 52 352 56 107 164 158 140 Ó FEBS 2003 1290 A Homann and G Link (Eur J Biochem 270) expressed mutant factors fused to maltose binding protein were purified on amylose affinity columns (NEB) In vitro transcription In vitro transcription reactions (25 lL) contained 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 80 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM MgCl2, mM dithiothreitol, 600 lM each of ATP, GTP and CTP, 10 lM UTP, 20 lCi [a-32P]UTP (Amersham, 400 lCi mmol)1), 10 U RNaseOUT (BRL), 0.05 U of E coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme (Roche) or 25 nM core enzyme (Epicentre), and lg double-stranded EcoRI-linearized DNA (pSA05/H120 carrying the psbA promoter; see Table and section ÔCloned FragmentsÕ above) Sigma proteins were added to give a final concentration of 100 nM Following preincubation at 30 °C for 10 without template, the latter was added and incubation was continued for 15 After phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation the transcripts were electrophoresed on 6% (w/v) sequencing gels Results Characterization of cDNAs for putative sigma factors from S alba The full-length cDNAs for SASIG1 [14] (accession number Y15899), SASIG2 (this work; accession number AJ276656) and SASIG3 (accession number AJ276657) were cloned from a mustard cDNA library They translate into open reading frames for 481 (SASIG1), 575 (SASIG2) and 567 amino acids (SASIG3), respectively As shown in Fig 1, the C-terminal portion of each derived SASIG polypeptide resembles that of eubacterial r70-type factors with their typical regions 1.2–4.2 [19] Within these regions, sequence elements can be located for which distinct functions have been assigned in bacterial systems This is exemplified in Fig for region 4.2, which contains a helix-turn-helix (HTH) unit [20] involved in recognition of the )35 promoter element [7] Compared to the C-terminal portion, the N-terminal half of the SASIG proteins is less conserved (Fig 3A) Although a putative region 1.2 could be localized as depicted in Fig 1A and 3A, no definite assignment of a region 1.1 was Fig Sequence features of derived putative sigma factors from mustard (Sinapis alba L) (A) Upper: Principal regions of eubacterial r70-type factors (left, N terminus; right, C terminus) Lower: Schematic representation of SASIG1–3 Boxes show the location of the conserved regions shared with the eubacterial r70 family as well as the putative transit peptide (TP) Amino acid positions are indicated below each factor and positions of restriction sites within the corresponding cDNA sequences are shown above A truncated SASIG3 protein (SASIG3-374) is indicated below the full-length protein (B) Sequences of the putative N-terminal transit peptides of SASIG1, and Serine and threonine residues are marked by dots, basic residues by + signs The hypothetical cleavage sites are marked by arrows (C) Alignment of regions 2.1–4.2 of SASIG1 (Y15899, Kestermann et al 1998), SASIG2 (AJ276656) and SASIG3 (AJ276657) from S alba and r70 from E coli (U23083) The HTH motif in region 4.2 is boxed Ó FEBS 2003 Recombinant plastid sigma factors (Eur J Biochem 270) 1291 possible (sequence data not shown) The most proximal part of each N-terminal SASIG protein revealed characteristics that could be implicated with chloroplast targeting on the basis of CHLOROP [21], PSORT [22], TARGETP [23] and PCLR [24] The putative transit peptide was predicted to comprise 83 amino acids in SASIG1, 39 in SASIG2, and 74 in SASIG3 (Fig 1B) Plastid localization of SASIG proteins Evidence for chloroplast targeting of SASIG1 was previously obtained [14] To find out if SASIG2 and are likewise chloroplast localized, antibodies were raised against the recombinant proteins and used in immunoblotting experiments In brief, cotyledons of light-grown mustard seedlings were harvested and protein extracts were prepared from either whole cells or purified chloroplasts The extracts were then electrophoretically separated, immunoblotted, and probed with anti-SASIG2 and anti-SASIG3 sera As shown in Fig 2A, each antiserum detected one single band, at 61 kDa (SASIG2) and 65 kDa (SASIG3), respectively, both in the whole-cell (lanes and 6) and chloroplast fractions (lanes and 7) It was therefore concluded that both SASIG2 and SASIG3 are to a large part localized to the chloroplast To investigate if the expression of SASIG2 and SASIG3 was affected by light vs dark growth conditions, mustard seedlings were grown for days either under continuous light or in darkness Whole-cell protein extracts were prepared from cotyledons and subjected to immunoblot analysis with antisera raised against SASIG2 or As shown in Fig 2B, the authentic plant protein corresponding to SASIG2 was found in higher relative amounts in the light (L) then in the dark (D) The converse was true for SASIG3, which accumulated to higher levels in etioplast-containing dark-grown tissue, indicating differential expression of the respective genes under these two growth conditions Furthermore, additional distinct bands below the major signal were visible in the protein sample from dark-grown tissue (Fig 2B, lane 4) following incubation with antiSASIG3 Although cross-reaction of the antiserum with other (dark-specific) proteins cannot be ruled out, it appears more likely that these smaller extra bands resulted from proteolytic cleavage (see Discussion) Sigma-like enzymatic properties of the cloned SASIG proteins To help decide whether the cloned SASIG proteins had indeed properties consistent with a role as a sigma factor, we Fig Chloroplast localization and expression characteristics of SASIG proteins (A) Immunodetection of SASIG2 and SASIG3 in protein fractions from mustard cotyledons Twenty micrograms whole-cell proteins (c) and proteins extracted from isolated chloroplasts (cp) were each immunoblotted using antisera against SASIG2 (lanes and 4) and SASIG3 (lanes and 7), or the corresponding preimmune sera (pi) (lanes and 5), respectively Lane shows the Coomassie-stained chloroplast protein extract (B) Proteins extracted from light-grown (L) or dark-grown (D) 4-day-old seedlings were immunoblotted with either anti-SASIG2 (lanes and 2) or anti-SASIG3 antisera (lanes and 4) used gel shift DNA binding (Fig 3B) and in vitro transcription assays (Fig 4) In each case, the full reaction contained either of the recombinant proteins mixed with E coli core RNA polymerase and the mustard psbA promoter [5,18] The choice of the heterologous system was based on previous findings demonstrating that the (biochemically purified) chloroplast SLFs in combination with E coli core enzyme 1292 A Homann and G Link (Eur J Biochem 270) Ó FEBS 2003 Fig Recombinant SASIG proteins exhibit sigma-like characteristics in DNA EMSA Gel shift assays with recombinant SASIG factors 1–3 and SASIG3-374 Each factor was incubated with a 32P-labelled psbA promoter fragment (H120) in the absence (lanes 4–7) or presence (lanes 8–11) of E coli core RNA polymerase Controls include labelled H120 alone (lane 1), core enzyme without sigma factor in the presence or absence of poly[dIdC] (lanes and 3), and full reactions (labelled DNA plus core plus sigma) incubated with unlabelled excess competitor DNAs (lanes 12–16) The latter were either the promoter-less fragment Bam0.5 (lanes 12–15) containing a portion of the trnK intron [14] or the H120 fragment itself (psbA promoter; lane 16) Positions of free labelled H120 (ÔfÕ) and of protein-DNA complexes (ÔbÕ) are given in the right margin were capable of faithful and efficient binding and transcription initiation at this promoter [25] Fig 3A gives a schematic view of the SASIG1–3 sequences derived from the full-length cDNAs The recombinant proteins used in the in vitro experiments lacked the N-terminal putative transit peptide Also included in this analysis was a more extensively truncated derivative of SASIG3, which represented only the C-terminal portion with position 374 as the first residue (SIG3-374) (Fig 3A, bottom) As shown in Fig 3B, the full reactions containing DNA, core enzyme and one of the recombinant SASIG proteins always resulted in a band shift (ÔbÕ position) as compared to the free probe (ÔfÕ position; lanes 8–11) The binding signal was stable in the presence of excess nonpromoter DNA, i.e the Bam0.5 intron fragment of the mustard chloroplast trnK gene [14] (lanes 12–15) The signal intensity became highly reduced, however, if unlabelled psbA promoter fragment was used as a competitor, as is exemplified in lane 16 for SASIG3 (see Figs and for the other factors) None of the controls consisting of the DNA probe alone (lane 1), or of probe plus recombinant proteins (lanes 4–7), gave a labelled band at the position of the binding signal Although a band was visible at this position when the probe fragment was incubated with E coli core enzyme alone in the absence of poly(dIdC) (lane 3), this unspecific binding signal [13] almost completely disappeared in the presence of the polynucleotide (lane 2) These data thus provided initial evidence that the SASIG proteins were able to confer specific DNA binding on the E coli core polymerase In another set of experiments we tested psbA promoterdriven transcription by core polymerase in the presence or absence of the recombinant SASIG proteins As shown in Fig 4, multiple run-off transcripts were detected following synthesis with core enzyme alone (lane 2) and none were visible with any of the recombinant factors alone (data not shown) In contrast, a major (66-nt) transcript of the size expected for faithful initiation at the psbA promoter [18] was visible with E coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme (lane 1) A single transcript of this size was detected also in the presence of core enzyme plus SASIG1 (lane 3), SASIG2 (lane 4), or SASIG3-374 (lane 6), indicating that each of these factors had mediated correct initiation This band was not visible, however, in the presence of core enzyme plus full-length SASIG3 (lane 5) Together, the EMSA (Fig 3B) and transcription data (Fig 4) suggest that the recombinant SASIG proteins confer promoter-specific binding and transcription initiation on the RNA polymerase, thus providing clues as to their functional roles as sigma factors [19] In the case of SASIG3, however, this seems true only for the truncated SASIG3-374, whereas the full-size protein directs DNA binding (Fig 3B, lane 10) but not transcription initiation (Fig 4, lane 5) Relative affinity of SASIG proteins to chloroplast promoters To further compare the promoter binding characteristics of the recombinant factors, they were tested in combination with a number of mustard chloroplast promoters as depicted in Fig 5A Competition gel shift experiments were carried out in the presence of E coli core enzyme, labelled psbA promoter fragment, and excess unlabelled fragments As shown in Fig 5B, the latter varied in their efficiency to act as competitors, both compared to one another and depending on which sigma factor was present in the reaction mixture The largest decrease in the intensity of the radioactive binding signal was always found when the psbA promoter fragment itself was used as competitor, which reflects the strength of this promoter [18] (Fig 5A) Ó FEBS 2003 Recombinant plastid sigma factors (Eur J Biochem 270) 1293 Fig Faithful in vitro transcription from the chloroplast psbA promoter functionally assigns the SASIG proteins as sigma factors Transcripts generated from the linearized plasmid pSA05/H120 by E coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme (lane 1), core enzyme alone (lane 2), core enzyme plus SASIG1–3 or SASIG3-374 (lanes 3–6) Run-off transcripts with a size expected for correct initiation at the in vivo start (+1) are marked by the arrow For the majority of other tested promoters, including those for trnK, trnQ, rps16 and rrn16, the competition patterns were similar with either SASIG1 or SASIG3 (including the truncated form SASIG3-374; data not shown), and they differed from that observed with SASIG2 (Fig 5B) The only deviations from this general pattern were observed for the rbcL and ycf3 promoters (Fig 5A) The rbcL promoter was completely ineffective in the presence of SASIG3 but showed slight competitor efficiency in the case of either SASIG1 or SASIG2 None of the three recombinant factors seemed to be able to mediate efficient binding to the ycf3 promoter as revealed by its almost complete inactivity as a competitor Mutational studies reveal common and distinct DNA-binding properties of SASIG proteins To analyse the role of single nucleotide positions within the chloroplast psbA promoter for DNA-binding, competition gel shift assays were carried out (Fig 6B) The psbA promoter mutants had base substitutions in either of the conserved regions, i.e the )35-region, the TATA box-like element, the )10-region, or the extended )10-motif (Fig 6A) The sigma factors that were used included the SASIG proteins as well as r70 from E coli Of the psbA promoter mutants that were altered in the )35-region, M-32 G/A (Fig 6B, upper right panel) almost completely lacked competitor efficiency in the EMSA, suggesting that the G/A exchange at this position had rendered the psbA promoter inactive as a binding target with any of the four sigma factors In contrast, the M-34 T/C mutant (upper row, middle) had a noticeable effect as a competitor, and even more so did M-30 C/A (second row, left) The latter revealed strength comparable to that of the wild-type promoter (WT; upper left) if either of the SASIG proteins was used In the presence of r70, however, this mutant had less competitor strength than the wild-type construct, which may indicate minor differences in binding requirements at this position for the plant vs bacterial factors Despite this, the results obtained with the )35 mutants support the view that bases within this region of the psbA promoter are common determinants of DNA binding strength In efforts to apply mutational strategies to other regions of the psbA promoter, we introduced four different singlebase substitutions into the TATA-box like element (Fig 6A) When these mutant constructs were tested, a partial loss of competitor strength became apparent, and this effect was more pronounced in the presence of SASIG1 and SASIG2 compared to SASIG3 and r70 This was most evident in the case of M-19 A/G (Fig 6B, third row, middle panel) and M-22 T/A (second row, right), whereas in the case of M-23 A/T (second row, middle) and M-21 A/T (third row, left) the decrease in competitor efficiency compared to wild-type (WT; upper left) was only marginal These data suggested that the plant factors SASIG1 and SASIG2 were capable of recognizing bases within the spacer between the )10- and )35-regions In contrast, SASIG3 and r70 seemed to be less dependent on contact sites within this region of the psbA promoter When base changes within the )10-region (Fig 6A) were tested in the EMSA (Fig 6B, bottom row), they all caused a reduction in competitor strength compared to the wild-type psbA promoter, yet to different extents Only a moderate decrease in competitor strength compared to wild-type (WT; upper left) was observed for M-5 T/C, a mutant in which the last base of the )10-element was altered (bottom row, right) More dramatic effects were noticeable with either the double mutant M-5–6 T/C–C/A (bottom row, middle) or with M-10 T/A (bottom, left) In contrast with the )35 mutant M-32 G/A (upper right panel), none of these )10 mutations seemed to uniformly affect binding by all four sigma factors In the case of M-5–6 T/C–C/A, the competitor strength of this mutant was still significantly stronger in the presence of SASIG1 than with any of the other factors tested The )10 T/A mutation dramatically affected the promoter usage by SASIG1 and wild-type; SASIG2 (as well as r70), but more weakly that by SASIG3 (Fig 6B, lower left) The latter factor lacks the conserved Glu in the )10-recognition region (Fig 7A), 1294 A Homann and G Link (Eur J Biochem 270) Ó FEBS 2003 Fig Promoter affinity of SASIG factors in competition EMSA studies (A) Sequence architecture of mustard chloroplast promoters used as competitors: psbA, trnK, trnQ, rps16, rbcL, ycf3, and rrn16 (P1 promoter) The )10, TATA-like and )35 elements are indicated (shaded) and transcription startpoints marked by arrowheads (B) Competition EMSAs The labelled psbA promoter fragment H120 was incubated with recombinant sigma factor in the presence of E coli core polymerase, poly[dIdC], and unlabelled promoter fragments The reaction mixtures were analysed as in Fig 3B and the binding signals were quantified by phosphoimaging The DNA binding activity in the presence of competitor DNA (light grey, 25 ng; dark grey, 100 ng) is expressed as a percentage of the signal intensity relative to that in the absence of competitor (100%) The data represent mean values of three independent experiments which participates in binding to the first base of the )10-element in E coli [26] The (5¢-TG-3¢) positions )13 and )12 of the mustard psbA promoter match those of the extended )10-motif of bacterial promoters, i.e the known contact site for residues in the sigma region 2.5 [27] Conserved amino acids reminiscent of this region are present in SASIG1 and SASIG2 but not in SASIG3 (Figs 7A; H and E) It was therefore of interest to test the possible role of bases within this region of the chloroplast promoter In contrast, the G/T transversion at )12 (Fig 6A) resulted in almost complete loss of competitor efficiency in the presence of SASIG1, SASIG2 or r70 (Fig 6B, third row, right panel) With SASIG3, however, only a partial reduction in competitor strength compared to wild-type (upper left) was noticeable, which is consistent with the lack of a conserved region 2.5 in this factor (Fig 7A) In the case of r70 the HTH-motif [20] in region 4.2 is involved in binding of the )35 promoter element [7] As shown in Fig 7A, two conserved amino acids, E13 and R16, can be identified in all three SASIG proteins within the HTH-region In r70 the Arg corresponding to R16 (R588) is known to interact with the third base of the )35-element of prokaryotic promoters [28] Using SASIG1, we therefore converted R16 into a His and tested the effect of the resulting sigma mutant SASIG1–455R/H in competition EMSAs (Fig 6) The maltose binding portion of the recombinant proteins did not interfere with core or promoter binding (data not shown) As is evident from Fig 7B (right panels; M-32 G/A), the mutant promoter M-32 G/A revealed almost wild-type competitor strength in the presence of the sigma mutant (455R/H), whereas it was largely inactive in the presence of wild-type SASIG1 None of the other )35-mutant promoters (Fig 6A) showed any significant response to SASIG1– 455R/H (data not shown) These results established the importance of residue(s) within the putative HTH-motif of the plastid sigma factor, which hence may be functionally related to that of bacterial r70 To study the interaction with the )10-region, we converted the Glu (Q300) in SASIG1 into a His and tested the promoter affinity of the resulting mutant factor SASIG1–300Q/H (Fig 7B, panels on the left) Whereas the mutant promoter construct M-10 T/A almost completely lacked competitor efficiency in the presence of the Ó FEBS 2003 Recombinant plastid sigma factors (Eur J Biochem 270) 1295 Fig DNA sequence determinants for sigma factor-mediated binding to the psbA promoter (A) Promoter mutants The sequence of the wild-type promoter (WT) is given, with the principal elements indicated on an extra line (top) The small horizontal arrow at +1 depicts the transcription start site Positions of base substitutions and names of the resulting variant promoters are shown below (B) Competitor strength of wild-type and mutant psbA promoters in EMSA The basic outline of the experiments was as in Fig 5, using labelled wild-type psbA promoter and either wild-type or mutant promoters as unlabelled competitors Each bar represents the DNA binding activity in the presence relative to that in the absence of 25 ng (light grey) or 100 ng (dark grey) competitor DNA The data represent mean values of three independent experiments unmodified SASIG1 protein (WT), it showed considerable strength (binding of the labelled psbA probe only 40% of that in the control) in the presence of the mutant factor (300Q/H) Hence this sigma mutant counteracted the effect of M-10 T/A None of the other )10 promoter mutations (Fig 6) were compensated by the Q/H exchange in SASIG1, nor was the psbA wild-type promoter affected to any appreciable extent (data not shown) Ó FEBS 2003 1296 A Homann and G Link (Eur J Biochem 270) Discussion Fig Amino acid residues of SASIG factors involved in promotor binding (A) Sequence alignments The regions of r70 known to be contact sites for the )35-element (HTH-motif), the )10-element ()10recognition region), and the extended )10-element (region 2.5) were aligned with the SASIG factors and conserved positions are shown boxed and light grey Arrows point to the cognate promoter elements ()35/)10; EX, extended )10), here exemplified by those of the psbA promoter (central line) (B) Results of competition EMSA, showing activity of promoter mutants M)10 T/A and M-32G/A with either SASIG1 or the mutant factors SASIG1–300Q/H or SASIG1–455R/H The positions of the changed amino acids of SASIG1 are given on an extra line below In the present work we have studied the three cloned mustard factors SASIG1-3 As shown in Figs and 2, all three proteins have extensive sequence similarity to the conserved regions 1.2–4.2 of bacterial sigma factors (see, e.g [7,29]) In contrast, a sequence that would closely match region 1.1, i.e a known modulator of DNA binding by regions and [30], was not detected The N-terminal region of each SASIG protein exhibits stretches rich in Ser and Thr residues (Fig 1B), which is a property of many chloroplast transit peptides (for review see [31]) and this region was tentatively identified as a transit peptide by several localization prediction programs The predominant chloroplast localization of the authentic mustard proteins corresponding to SASIG2 and SASIG3 was verified by immunoblotting experiments (Fig 2) and for SASIG1 this had previously been demonstrated by in organello import assays [14] We wish to note that it cannot be ruled out that a minor fraction might be targeted to different intracellular sites, as was shown recently for other chloroplast transcriptional proteins [1,32], including a putative sigma factor from maize [33] However, a predominant chloroplast localization of the mustard SASIG proteins is in agreement with the conclusions reached for the Arabidopsis putative sigma proteins [34–36] Transcript analyses of sigma factor genes from monocot and dicot plant species showed most of these to be more actively expressed under light-grown as compared to darkgrown conditions in plant tissue [37–41], and to be almost silent in roots [34,36,42] On the other hand, Western analyses have provided evidence for differential expression profiles at the protein level Our previous results for SASIG1 [14] and the present data for SASIG2 and SASIG3 together suggest that the three factors not have uniform expression profiles Both SASIG1 and SASIG2 (Fig 2B, lanes and 2) accumulate preferentially in green tissue of light-grown seedlings, whereas SASIG3 is more abundant in etioplast-containing dark-grown tissue (lanes and 4) This situation is reminiscent of the protein accumulation profiles of two putative sigma factors from the monocot Zea mays The ZMSIG3 protein, which has 36% sequence similarity to SASIG3 (data not shown), was mostly found in nongreen tissue, whereas ZMSIG1 (50% similarity with SASIG2) accumulated in green leaf tissue [15] That the recombinant SASIG proteins have enzymatic characteristics consistent with a role as a sigma factor was demonstrated both in EMSA DNA binding (Fig 3B) and in vitro transcription experiments (Fig 4) In the gel shift assays each of the three proteins was found to interact with E coli core enzyme, resulting in a functional RNA polymerase holoenzyme that was capable of binding to the chloroplast psbA promoter (Fig 3B, lanes 8–11) The specificity of DNA binding was indicated by the result that excess unlabelled psbA promoter fragment could function as a competitor (Figs and 6), whereas complex formation was resistant to the addition of a nonpromoter fragment (Fig 3, lanes 12–15) As shown in Fig 3, there was no retarded signal with any of the sigma factors alone in the absence of core enzyme (lanes 4–7) This was true also for the N-terminally truncated factor SASIG3-374, in contrast Ó FEBS 2003 Recombinant plastid sigma factors (Eur J Biochem 270) 1297 to the situation for r70, which upon cleavage of its N terminus becomes able to bind to promoter DNA in the absence of core enzyme [30] Furthermore, in native r70 regions 1.1 and are located in close proximity, with region 1.1 acting as an autoinhibition domain Sigma–core interaction induces a conformational change that unmasks the DNA binding domains [43,44] The lack of DNA binding by SASIG3-374 is consistent with the apparent absence of a functional region 1.1 in (full-length) SASIG3, although it should be noted that also region 1.2 and part of region were removed during construction of SASIG3-374 To further clarify the role of the SASIG proteins as initiation factors, in vitro transcription assays were carried out The results depicted in Fig established this role for SASIG1 and SASIG2, but not for SASIG3 Transcripts of the size expected for correct initiation could only be detected with truncated SASIG3-374 but not with the full-length protein, indicating that the latter might be inactive because of inhibitory sequences at the N terminus Inspection of the SASIG3 sequence revealed a motif (residues 277–298) with strong similarity to the amino terminus of rK from B subtilis [45] (Fig 8C) It has long been known that certain sporulation factors (rE, rK) are synthesized as inactive precursors that are converted into the active mature proteins by site-specific proteolysis of approximately 20 amino acids at the N terminus [46,47] A transcription-inhibitory effect of the N-terminal region of the SASIG3 homologue from Arabidopsis thaliana, ATSIG3, has recently been described [48] Our present data confirm and extend these findings, suggesting that the SASIG3 N-terminal region inhibits transcription (Fig 4) but not promoter binding (Fig 3B) If full-length SASIG3 represents the transcriptionally inactive ÔproÕ form of this plastid sigma factor, the cleavage and subsequent release of proteolytic fargment(s) might be a rapid and tightly regulated process involving one of the known chloroplast proteases in vivo [49] Our immunoblotting experiments (Fig 2B, lane 4) suggest limited proteolytic cleavage of the authentic protein detected by antibodies against SASIG3 It is interesting to note, however, that smaller-sized bands were detected only with blotted proteins from dark-grown seedlings (lane 4), where SASIG3 seems to be present in higher relative amounts than in the fraction from light-grown material (lane 3) It is possible that the kinetics of the proteolytic cleavage differ in a plastid-type and/or developmental stage-specific way, with immediate consequences for the availability and function of SASIG3 in vivo as depicted in the model shown in Fig This model is based on our observations that full-length SASIG3 efficiently binds to the promoter DNA but is unable to initiate transcription Only after cleavage of the N-terminal region does the truncated factor (such as SASIG3-374) become transcriptionally competent The enzymatic conversion of the pro-factor into a fully functional (truncated) SASIG3 protein not only has an effect on transcription under the control of this factor itself, but also on that driven by other plastid sigma factors Based on the similarities in promoter usage in vitro by SASIG1–3 (Figs 3, and 6), it is conceivable that these factors are capable of competing for one and the same promoter Tight binding of one factor (e.g the SASIG3 pro-factor) hence can result in inhibition of transcription by others Fig Scheme depicting the possible in vivo control of plastid transcription by proteolytic cleavage of the SASIG3 factor (A) The full-size SASIG3 Ôpro-factorÕ is capable of binding to the psbA promoter but does not allow efficient transcription (B) The SASIG3 motif with similarity to N-terminal residues of the rK pro-factor from B subtilis (inset) It is suggested that upon proteolytic cleavage the mature SASIG3 protein might confer the ability of transcription initiation on the RNA polymerase complex Note that, as a result of similarities in DNA binding affinity of the multiple SASIG proteins, the transcription driven by SASIG1 or SASIG2 can likewise be affected by the binding of (in)active SASIG3 (C) Alignment of the pro-sequence of rK from B subtilis with SASIG3 Identical amino acids are marked by asterisks and conserved substitutions by dots Work on the in vivo expression of the sigma factors from other plants has established overlapping transcript patterns for individual members [34,37,40] Moreover, genetic evidence is available from Arabidopsis, where a ATSIG2 knockout mutant has only a weak and stage-specific chlorophyll-deficient phenotype, and none of the chloroplast genes psbA, psbD and rbcL was reported to be significantly affected in its expression by this mutation [50] This suggests that the lack of one particular sigma factor may have less deleterious effects than the converse situation, where a factor physically interferes with transcription unless it is converted into its active form Proteolytic cleavage (Fig 8) is just one of a number of possible mechanisms to achieve this, considering the widespread occurrence of protein modifications that can affect the activity of transcription factors [51] To address the question as to what extent the SASIG factors reveal selective promoter affinity, we carried out Ó FEBS 2003 1298 A Homann and G Link (Eur J Biochem 270) competition EMSA experiments using several different chloroplast promoters (Fig 5) The strong psbA promoter is recognized by all SASIG factors, and with comparable affinity by each factor Although the other plastid promoters tested in Fig acted more weakly in terms of competitor strength compared to the psbA promoter In a relatively few instances there were noticeable differences in the promoter interaction of the individual plastid sigma factors e.g in the case of the rbcL vs ycf3 promoters (Fig 5) This supports the view that, rather than acting in a strictly promoterselective way, the multiple plastid sigma factors seem to be capable of substituting for each other in vivo Development and environmental cues are likely to play a role in the expression patterns of the SASIG factors, as is indicated, for example, by the complementary mode of light vs dark accumulation of SASIG2 and SASIG3 (Fig 2B) ATSIG5, one of the Arabidopsis factors, has been reported to reveal a blue-light activated mode of gene expression [41] Changes in sigma factor abundance and/or activity reflect the activity of interacting proteins, some of which have recently been described to play a role in the regulation of plastid transcription [52–55] More detailed insight into the determinants for sigma factor–psbA promoter interactions was sought in the mutational studies shown in Figs and These experiments provided evidence that the three plant factors reacted similarly to the mutations in the )35-region but more diverse to the other regions of the promoter Previous work using r70 from E coli had shown that mutations in the recognition helix of the HTH DNA-binding motif in region 4.2 led to altered interaction with the )35-region [28,56] The mutation of the third base of the psbA)35-region (M-32 G/A) resulted in complete loss of promoter activity for all sigma proteins The amino acid at position 16 of the r70 HTH motif (R588) is known to interact with this specific base position [28] In all three mustard sigma factors there is an HTH motif containing a conserved Arg within region 4.2 (Figs and 7) Because of this similarity with r70 we reasoned that Arg455 in SASIG1, Arg545 in SASIG2 and Arg542 in SASIG3 are the residues that might interact with the third base of the )35 element of the mustard psbA promoter To address this question we substituted Arg455 of SASIG1 by a His and tested the resulting mutant factor SASIG1–455R/H for promoter binding activity The results (Fig 7B) showing that the effect of the promoter down-mutation was compensated by the Arg to His change in the recombinant factor suggest that Arg455 of SASIG1 is indeed involved in the interaction with the third position of the )35-region Using similar mutational approaches, evidence was obtained for a functional role of at least two other regions of the plastid sigma factor(s) One is the region 2.5 equivalent [27] found in SASIG1 and SASIG2 but not in SASIG3 (Fig 7) With the M-12 G/T mutant of the psbA promoter that carried a TG to TT change of the extended )10-region, there was a high decrease in promoter affinity for either SASIG1, SASIG2 or r70, as was expected from previous findings with r70 and bacterial promoter mutants [57] For SASIG3, however, the decrease was much smaller, thus reflecting the lack of a conserved region 2.5 in this factor (Fig 7) Furthermore, evidence based on )10-mutants of the psbA promoter suggests a functional link with a )10 recognition region of a cloned plastid sigma factor (Fig 7) Region of r70 forms an amphipathic helix [58], a sequence feature that is conserved in each of the plastid sigma factors (data not shown) This implies that the general )10 DNA-contacting mechanism might be comparable and this view has been strengthened by mutational studies Conversion of the Glu at position 437 (region 2.4) of r70 into a His had previously been shown to enhance the activity with a mutant promoter that carried a substitution at the first position of the )10 hexamer [26] As is evident from Fig 7A, a conserved Glu is present in SASIG1 (Q300) and SASIG2 (Q394) but not in SASIG3, in agreement with the findings (Fig 6) that SASIG3 reacted more weakly with the psbA mutant promoter M-10 G/T These data suggested that Q300 of SASIG1 and Q394 of SASIG2 each were involved in the interaction with the first base of the )10 element of the psbA promoter This notion was strengthened by the results obtained with SASIG1–300Q/H, which showed significant activity with the mutant promoter (Fig 7B) In E coli, a second residue within region 2.4 of r70 (T440) is known to interact with the first base of the )10-hexamer [56] As shown in Fig 7A, none of the three plant factors contains this conserved Thr, which could reflect differences in DNA binding between the bacterial and plant sigma factors Acknowledgements We would like to thank C Berndt and M Bockmann for their initial ¨ participation in the cloning of the plastid sigma factors This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 480-B7) References Cahoon, A.B & Stern, D.B (2001) Plastid transcription: a menage ` a trois Trends Plant Sci 6, 45–46 Hajdukiewicz, P.T.J., Allison, L.A & Maliga, P (1997) The two RNA polymerases encoded by the nuclear and the plastid compartments transcribe distinct groups of genes in tobacco plastids EMBO J 16, 4041–4048 Sugita, M & Sugiura, M (1996) Regulation of gene expression in chloroplasts of higher plants Plant Mol Biol 32, 315–326 Maliga, P (1998) Two plastid RNA polymerases of higher plants: an evolving story Trends Plant Sci 3, 4–6 Link, G (1994) Plastid differentiation: organelle promoters and transcription factors In Plant Promoters and Transcription Factors (Nover, L., ed.), pp 65–85 Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg Ishihama, A (2000) Functional modulation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase Annu Rev Microbiol 54, 499–518 Helmann, J.D (2001) Sigma factors in gene expression Enc Life Sci Nature Publishing Group, London McFadden, G.I (2001) Chloroplast origin and integration Plant Physiol 125, 50–53 Liu, B & Troxler, R.F (1996) Molecular characterization of a positively photoregulated nuclear gene for a chloroplast RNA polymerase r factor in Cyanidium caldarium Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 3313–3318 10 Tanaka, K., Oikawa, K., Ohta, N., Kuroiwa, H., Kuroiwa, T & Takahashi, H (1996) Nuclear encoding of a chloroplast RNA polymerase sigma subunit in a red alga Science 272, 1932–1935 11 Allison, L.A (2000) The role of sigma factors in plastid transcription Biochimie 82, 537–548 Ó FEBS 2003 Recombinant plastid sigma factors (Eur J Biochem 270) 1299 12 Tiller, K & Link, G (1993) Sigma-like transcription factors from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) etioplast are similar in size to, but functionally distinct from, their chloroplast counterparts Plant Mol Biol 21, 503–513 13 Tiller, K & Link, G (1993) Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation affect functional characteristics of chloroplast and etioplast transcription systems from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) EMBO J 12, 1745–1753 14 Kestermann, M., Neukirchen, S., Kloppstech, K & Link, G (1998) Sequence and expression characteristics of a nuclearencoded chloroplast sigma factor from mustard (Sinapis alba) Nucl Acids Res 26, 2747–2753 15 Lahiri, S.D & Allison, L.A (2000) Complementary expression of two plastid-localized r-like factors in maize Plant Physiol 123, 883–894 ´ 16 Baena-Gonzalez, E., Baginsky, S., Mulo, P., Summer, H., Aro, E.-M & Link, G (2001) Chloroplast transcription at different light intensities Glutathione-mediated phosphorylation of the major RNA polymerase involved in redox-regulated organellar gene expression Plant Physiol 127, 1044–1052 17 Summer, H., Pfannschmidt, T & Link, G (2000) Transcripts and sequence elements suggest differential promoter usage within the ycf3-psaAB gene cluster on mustard (Sinapis alba L.) chloroplast DNA Curr Genet 37, 45–52 18 Eisermann, A., Tiller, K & Link, G (1990) In vitro transcription and DNA binding characteristics of chloroplast and etioplast extracts from mustard (Sinapis alba) indicate differential usage of the psbA promoter EMBO J 9, 3981–3987 19 Helmann, J.D & Chamberlin, M.J (1988) Structure and function of bacterial sigma factors Annu Rev Biochem 57, 839–872 20 Pabo, C.O & Sauer, R.T (1984) Protein-DNA recognition Annu Rev Biochem 53, 293–321 21 Emanuelsson, O., Nielsen, H & Von Heijne, G (1999) ChloroP, a neural network-based method for predicting chloroplast transit peptides and their cleavage sites Protein Sci 8, 978–984 22 Nakai, K & Horton, P (1999) PSORT: a program for detecting sorting signals in proteins and predicting their subcellular localization Trends Biochem Sci 24, 34–35 23 Emanuelsson, O., Nielsen, H., Brunak, S & Von Heijne, G (2000) Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence J Mol Biol 300, 1005–1016 24 Schein, A.I., Kissinger, J.C & Ungar, L.H (2001) Chloroplast transit peptide prediction: a peek inside the black box Nucleic Acids Res 29, e82 25 Tiller, K & Link, G (1995) Sigma-like plastid transcription factors In Transcription and Translation Protocols (Tymms, M., ed.), pp 337–348 Humana Press, Clifton, N.J 26 Waldburger, C., Gardella, T., Wong, R & Susskind, M.M (1990) Changes in conserved region of Escherichia coli r70 affecting promoter recognition J Mol Biol 215, 267–276 27 Barne, K.A., Bown, J.A., Busby, S.J.W & Minchin, S.D (1997) Region 2.5 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase r70 subunit is responsible for the recognition of the Ôextended -10Õ motif at promoters EMBO J 16, 4034–4040 28 Gardella, T., Moyle, H & Susskind, M.M (1989) A mutant Escherichia coli r70 subunit of RNA polymerase with altered promoter specificity J Mol Biol 206, 579–590 29 Kuznedelov, K., Minakhin, L., Niedziela-Majka, A., Dove, S.L., Rogulja, D., Nickels, B.E., Hochschild, A., Heyduk, T & Severinov, K (2002) A role for interaction of the RNA polymerase flap domain with the r subunit in promoter recognition Science 295, 855–857 30 Dombroski, A.J., Walter, W.A., Record, M.T Jr, Siegele, D.A & Gross, C.A (1992) Polypeptides containing highly conserved regions of transcription initiation factor r70 exhibit specificity of binding to promoter DNA Cell 70, 501–512 31 Bruce, B.D (2001) The paradox of plastid transit peptides: conservation of function despite divergence in primary structure Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1541, 2–21 32 Kobayashi, Y., Dokiya, Y & Sugita, M (2001) Dual targeting of phage-type RNA polymerase to both mitochondria and plastids is due to alternative translation initiation in single transcripts Biochem Biophys Res Commun 289, 1106–1113 33 Beardslee, T.A., Roy-Chowdhury, S., Jaiswal, P., Buhot, L., Lerbs-Mache, S., Stern, D.B & Allison, L.A (2002) A nucleusencoded maize protein with sigma factor activity accumulates in mitochondria and chloroplasts Plant J 31, 199–209 34 Isono, K., Niwa, Y., Satoh, K & Kobayashi, H (1997) Evidence for transcriptional regulation of plastid photosynthesis genes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots Plant Physiol 114, 623–630 35 Kanamaru, K., Fujiwara, M., Seki, M., Katagiri, T., Nakamura, M., Mochizuki, N., Nagatani, A., Shinozaki, K., Tanaka, K & ´ Takahashi, H (1999) Plastidic RNA polymerase o factors in Arabidopsis Plant Cell Physiol 40, 832–842 36 Fujiwara, M., Nagashima, A., Kanamaru, K., Tanaka, K & Takahashi, H (2000) Three new nuclear genes, sigD, sigE and ´ sigF, encoding putative plastid RNA polymerase o factors in Arabidopsis thaliana FEBS Lett 481, 47–52 37 Tanaka, K., Tozawa, Y., Mochizuki, N., Shinozaki, K., Nagatani, A., Wakasa, K & Takahashi, H (1997) Characterization of three cDNA species encoding plastid RNA polymerase sigma factors in Arabidopsis thaliana: Evidence for the sigma factor heterogeneity in higher plant plastids FEBS Lett 413, 309–313 38 Tozawa, Y., Tanaka, K., Takahashi, H & Wakasa, K (1998) ´ Nuclear encoding of a plastid o factor in rice and its tissue- and light-dependent expression Nucl Acids Res 26, 415–419 39 Morikawa, K., Ito, S., Tsunoyama, Y., Nakahira, Y., Shiina, T & Toyoshima, Y (1999) Circadian-regulated expression of a nuclearencoded plastid r factor gene (sigA) in wheat seedlings FEBS Lett 451, 275–278 40 Tan, S & Troxler, R.F (1999) Characterization of two chloroplast RNA polymerase sigma factors from Zea mays: Photoregulation and differential expression Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 5316– 5321 41 Tsunoyama, Y., Morikawa, K., Shiina, T & Toyoshima, Y ´ (2002) Blue light specific and differential expression of a plastid o factor, Sig5 in Arabidopsis thaliana FEBS Lett 516, 225–228 42 Oikawa, K., Fujiwara, M., Nakazato, E., Tanaka, K & Takahashi, H (2000) Characterization of two plastid r factors, SigA1 and SigA2, that mainly function in matured chloroplasts in Nicotiana tabacum Gene 261, 221–228 43 Dombroski, A.J., Walter, W.A & Gross, C.A (1993) Aminoterminal amino acids modulate r-factor DNA-binding activity Genes Dev 7, 2446–2455 44 Mekler, V., Kortkhonjia, E., Mukhopadhyay, J., Knight, J., Revyakin, A., Kapanidis, A.N., Niu, W., Ebright, Y.W., Levy, R & Ebright, R.H (2002) Structural organization of bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme and the RNA polymerase-promoter open complex Cell 108, 599–614 45 Kroos, L.Kunkel, B & Losick, R (1989) Switch protein alters specificity of RNA polymerase containing a compartment-specific sigma factor Science 243, 526–529 46 Stragier, P & Losick, R (1996) Molecular genetics of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis Annu Rev Genet 30, 297–341 47 Rudner, D.Z., Fawcett, P & Losick, R (1999) A family of membrane-embedded metalloproteases involved in regulated proteolysis of membrane-associated transcription factors Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 14765–11477 48 Hakimi, M.-A., Privat, I., Valay, J.-G & Lerbs-Mache, S (2000) Evolutionary conservation of C-terminal domains of primary sigma70-type transcription factors between plants and bacteria J Biol Chem 275, 9215–9221 1300 A Homann and G Link (Eur J Biochem 270) 49 Sokolenko, A., Pojidaeva, E., Zinchenko, V., Panichkin, V., Glaser, V.M., Herrmann, R.G & Shestakov, S.V (2002) The gene complement for proteolysis in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp PCC 6803 and Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts Curr Genet 41, 291–310 50 Shirano, Y., Shimada, H., Kanamaru, K., Fujiwara, M., Tanaka, K., Takahashi, H., Unno, K., Sato, S., Tabata, S., Hayashi, H., Miyake, C., Yokota, A & Shibata, D (2000) Chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana requires the nuclear-encoded transcription factor Sigma B FEBS Lett 485, 178–182 51 Orphanides, G & Reinberg, D (2002) A unified theory of gene expression Cell 108, 439–451 52 Baginsky, S., Tiller, K & Link, G (1997) Transcription factor phosphorylation by a protein kinase associated with chloroplast RNA polymerase from mustard (Sinapis alba) Plant Mol Biol 34, 181–189 53 Baginsky, S., Tiller, K., Pfannschmidt, T & Link, G (1999) PTK, the chloroplast RNA polymerase-associated protein kinase from mustard (Sinapis alba), mediates redox control of plastid in vitro transcription Plant Mol Biol 39, 1013–1023 Ó FEBS 2003 54 Morikawa, K., Shiina, T., Murakami, S & Toyoshima, Y (2002) Novel nuclear-encoded proteins interacting with a plastid sigma factor, Sig1 Arabidopsis thaliana FEBS Lett 514, 300–304 55 Ogrzewalla, K., Piotrowski, M., Reinbothe, S & Link, G (2002) The plastid transcription kinase from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) – a nuclear-encoded CK2-type chloroplast enzyme with redox-sensitive function Eur J Biochem 269, 3329–3337 56 Siegele, D.A., Hu, J.C., Walter, W.A & Gross, C.A (1989) Altered promoter recognition by mutant forms of the r70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase J Mol Biol 206, 591–603 57 Kumar, A., Malloch, R.A., Fujita, N., Smillie, D.A., Ishihama, A & Hayward, R.S (1993) The minus 35-recognition region of Escherichia coli sigma 70 is inessential for initiation of transcription at an Ôextended minus 10Õ promoter J Mol Biol 232, 406– 418 58 Malhotra, A., Severinova, E & Darst, S.A (1996) Crystal structure of a r70 subunit fragment from E coli RNA polymerase Cell 87, 127–136  ... 2003 Recombinant plastid sigma factors (Eur J Biochem 270) 1299 12 Tiller, K & Link, G (1993) Sigma- like transcription factors from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) etioplast are similar in size to,... cluster on mustard (Sinapis alba L.) chloroplast DNA Curr Genet 37, 45–52 18 Eisermann, A., Tiller, K & Link, G (1990) In vitro transcription and DNA binding characteristics of chloroplast and etioplast... HTH-motif [20] in region 4.2 is involved in binding of the )35 promoter element [7] As shown in Fig 7A, two conserved amino acids, E13 and R16, can be identified in all three SASIG proteins within the