1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo Dục - Đào Tạo

Cases and Materials on the English Legal System doc

925 1.8K 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Cấu trúc

  • Cover

  • Half-title

  • Series-title

  • Title

  • Copyright

  • Contents

  • Preface to the tenth edition

  • Preface to the first edition

  • Acknowledgements

  • Cases and Materials on the English Legal System

  • Command papers, Hansard, House of Commons papers and other official publications excerpted (in chronological order)

  • Books, pamphlets, memoranda, speeches and articles excerpted

  • Table of statutes

  • Table of cases

  • Chapter 1 The organisation of trial courts

    • 1. Introduction

    • 2. The trial courts – work and organisation

      • (1) The civil courts

        • The High Court

          • History(sup[14])

          • The High Court today

          • Judges in High Court cases

          • Interlocutory work in the High Court

        • The county court

          • Small claims in the county court

        • Magistrates’ courts

        • Family court work

        • The allocation of cases between higher and lower civil trial courts

        • Toward a unified civil courts system

      • (2) The criminal courts

        • The Crown Court

          • Committals for sentence only

          • Appeals heard by the Crown Court

          • Crown Court judicial manpower

          • ’Ticketing’ of judges

        • Magistrates’ courts

          • Composition of the bench

          • The balance between lay and professional magistrates

          • Extent of summary jurisdiction

          • Justices’ chief executives, justices’ clerks and court clerks

    • 3. Managing the courts

      • Lord Justice Auld’s review

      • The Courts Act 2003

      • Auld’s proposal for a middle tier of jurisdiction rejected

    • 4. IT for the courts

    • 5. The tribunal system

  • Chapter 2 Pre-trial civil proceedings

    • 1. Introduction

      • The court’s duty to manage cases

        • The three tracks

          • Small claims

          • Fast track

          • Multi-track

      • The Civil Procedure Rules

        • The Human Rights Act and the CPR

        • User-friendly language

        • Research on the Woolf reforms

    • 2. Few cases are ever started and fewer reach court

      • The myth of the ‘compensation culture’

      • The attrition of claims

      • The advantages of ‘repeat players’

      • Legal privileges that promote settlement

      • The pre-action protocols

        • Are the protocols a success?

    • 3. Legal proceedings

      • Who can sue? Representative parties and group litigation

      • Woolf and multi-party actions

      • Which court?

      • What kind of proceedings should be started?

      • Contents of the claim form

        • Contents of the particulars of claim

        • The statement of truth

      • The drafting of documents – out with old-style pleadings?

      • The cost of initiating proceedings

      • Venue

      • Issue and service of proceedings

      • Responding to a claim

      • Acknowledgment of service

      • A defence

      • Claimant’s right of reply

      • Allocation to track

      • Counterclaim

      • Seeking more information

      • Making applications for pre-trial court orders

      • Amendments

      • Judgment in default

      • Summary judgment

      • Part 36 offers to settle and payment into court

    • 4. Getting the documentary evidence

      • Disclosure (formerly ‘discovery’) from one’s opponent

        • Woolf on discovery

        • The new rules (CPR, Part 31)

        • No disclosure if legal professional privilege applies

        • No disclosure if public interest immunity applies

        • Disclosure from someone who is not (or is not yet) a party

        • Medical records

        • Disclosure from a third party to correct wrongdoing (the Norwich Pharmacal principle)

        • The ‘mere witness’ rule

        • Subsequent use of disclosed document

    • 5. Getting evidence from witnesses

      • There is no property in a witness

      • Interim remedies

      • Obtaining advance notice of one’s opponent’s witnesses and of their evidence

        • Revolution in the rules for the exchange of evidence

        • Has the exchange of witness statements proved beneficial?

        • Who can inspect the witness statements?

      • The expert witness in the pre-trial process

    • 6. Pre-trial case management

      • The Woolf reforms

        • Small claims

        • Fast track

        • Multi-track

      • Case management conferences, pre-trial reviews, listing hearings

        • Utility of pre-trial hearing

      • What to do about delay

        • The systems approach of official committees

        • The 1995 Practice Direction

        • The Woolf reforms

      • American research on the effects of case management

      • Sanctions and the new rules

      • Assessment of the Woolf reforms

        • Apparent benefits deriving from the Woolf reforms

        • Issues of concern or uncertainty

          • The fall in the number of cases issued

          • Costs

          • Delay

          • Inconsistent decisions

          • Unjust application of sanctions

        • Conclusion

      • FURTHER READING

    • 7. Alternative dispute resolution

      • Woolf and ADR

      • The costs sanction

      • Low take-up

      • FURTHER READING

  • Chapter 3 Pre-trial criminal proceedings

    • 1. Introduction – the overriding objective

      • Evaluating criminal justice systems

    • 2. Questioning of suspects by the police

      • The importance and quality of police questioning

      • The danger of false confessions

      • The Judges’ Rules

      • Whom can the police question?

      • The citizen is not normally obliged to answer police questions

        • When the citizen is under a duty to answer

        • Arrest for failure to give name and address

        • Obstructing the police

      • The legal consequences of silence in the face of police questioning

        • The Criminal Law Revision Committee

        • The Philips Royal Commission

        • The ‘right of silence’ debate reopened

          • Report of the Home Office Working Group

        • The Runciman Royal Commission

        • The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

        • Judicial interpretation of the right to silence provisions

        • Empirical evidence on the right to silence changes

    • 3. Safeguards for the suspect

      • Access to a lawyer

        • The Philips Royal Commission

        • PACE

        • Getting a lawyer

        • Statistical data

        • The adviser in the police station

        • Note – ‘serious arrestable offences’ abolished

      • Informing someone that one has been arrested

      • Tape recording of interviews

        • Exchanges that are not recorded

      • The regime in the police station – the Codes of Practice and the custody officer

        • Information to the person in custody

        • Records of interviews

        • Conditions of detention

        • Medical treatment

        • Conduct of interviews

        • The questioning of juveniles and mentally disordered or otherwise mentally vulnerable persons

        • Interpreters

        • Questioning of deaf persons

      • Rules preventing improper pressure on suspects

    • 4. Stop, arrest and detention

      • Stops in the street

        • The Philips Royal Commission on stop and search

        • PACE

        • The Code of Practice for stop and search

        • Power to stop and search randomly

        • Abolition of ‘voluntary’ searches

        • Records of stops and searches

        • Recording of stops that do not result in a search

        • Statistics

      • Can a person be held in the police station if he is not under arrest?

      • Arrest

        • Arrest under warrant

        • Arrest without warrant at common law

        • Arrest without a warrant under statute – new PACE s. 24

          • Arrest by a police officer

          • Citizen’s arrest

        • Detention for thirty minutes by a civilian

      • Procedure on arrest

        • Summons or arrest?

        • Remedies for unlawful arrest

      • Detention for questioning

      • The time limits on detention for questioning

        • The Philips Royal Commission

        • PACE

        • Charging

        • Statistics on length of detention and charges

      • Terrorism cases

        • Indefinite detention of terrorist suspects without charges

        • Indefinite detention without charges replaced by control orders

    • 5. Establishing the suspect’s identity

      • Fingerprints

      • Footwear impressions

      • Photographs

    • 6. Getting the evidence

      • Identification evidence

      • Search after an arrest

        • Searching the arrested person

        • Searching premises after an arrest

          • The Philips Royal Commission on search of the person after arrest and of premises

          • PACE

        • Intimate searches, x-rays and ultrasound scans

        • Intimate and non-intimate samples

        • When samples can be retained

      • Powers to enter premises other than after an arrest

        • At common law

        • Lawful entry

        • The Philips Royal Commission

        • PACE

        • Excluded material

        • Special procedure material

      • Search warrants

      • Search by consent and executing a search warrant

        • Conduct of searches

      • Telephone tapping, ‘bug and burgle’ and other surveillance by the security agencies and police

      • Seizure of evidence

        • The Philips Royal Commission

        • PACE

      • The power to freeze the suspect’s assets

    • 7. The prosecution process

      • The police have a wide discretion

        • Class bias in prosecutions

      • Proposals for an independent prosecution process

        • The Philips Royal Commission’s report

        • The Government’s response

      • The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)

        • The Glidewell Report

        • The Government’s response to Glidewell

        • The Auld Review

      • The CPS takes on the task of charging

      • The decision to prosecute

        • The Code for Crown Prosecutors

        • Guide to case disposal

        • Reducing discretion by new ‘charging standards’

        • Cautioning as an alternative to prosecution

      • Discontinuance by the CPS

      • Judicial control of police discretion in prosecution policy

        • Remedies for the prosecution’s failure to prosecute

          • Normally no duty to give reasons for not prosecuting

      • Is the CPS independent of the police?

      • The three stages of the CPS’s history

      • Other prosecutors

        • The Law Officers

        • Serious Fraud Office

        • Customs and Excise

        • Prosecution by other public bodies

        • Private prosecutions

      • Duties of prosecuting lawyers

        • The prosecutor and those instructing him

        • The barrister and the judge

    • 8. Bail or remand in custody(sup[394])

      • Bail on the street

      • Bail from the police station

      • Bail decisions by courts

        • The Bail Act 1976

        • How many bail applications?

        • Length of periods of remand

        • Appeals against a refusal of bail

        • Appeals against a grant of bail

          • Note

      • Causes for concern

      • New developments

    • 9. Information supplied to the opponent (‘disclosure’)

      • Evidence the prosecution intend to use

      • Evidence the prosecution do not intend to use (‘unused material’)

        • Common law 1946–1981

        • Attorney General’s 1981 Guidelines

        • Common law 1989–1995

        • Runciman Royal Commission

          • The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 and the Code of Practice

        • Auld on disclosure

        • The Criminal Justice Act 2003 and further changes

        • Prosecution disclosure of sensitive material – public interest immunity (PII)

      • Scientific evidence

        • Defence access to scientific or forensic testing

      • Other issues of prosecution disclosure

      • Disclosure by the defence

        • The common law position

        • Alibi exception

        • Philips Royal Commission

        • Expert evidence exception

        • Roskill Committee

        • Runciman Royal Commission

        • The special case of expert evidence

        • Auld on defence disclosure

        • Criminal Justice Act 2003

        • Defence disclosure in the magistrates’ courts

      • The 2006 Disclosure Protocol

      • The prospects regarding disclosure

    • 10. The allocation of cases between higher and lower criminal trial courts

      • History

        • Origins of the right to trial by jury

      • The debate over allocation 1975–2002

        • James Committee (1975)

        • 1986 consultation paper

        • 1990 Practice Note

        • Runciman Royal Commission (1993)

        • 1995 consultation paper

        • Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s. 49(1)

        • Narey Report (1997)

        • Mode of Trial Bill No. 1 (1999)

        • Mode of Trial Bill No. 2 (2000)

        • Auld Report (2001)

        • July 2002, the Government gives up

    • 11. The guilty plea

      • Why do defendants plead guilty?

      • The innocent who plead guilty

      • The role of the lawyers

      • Other factors in guilty pleas

      • The sentence discount

      • The judge’s involvement in plea discussions

      • Making the discount explicit

        • R v. Goodyear

      • Use of the sentence discount – or even total immunity – for helping the prosecution

        • Note – TICs

      • Taking a plea before mode of trial decision as to venue

    • 12. Committal or transfer proceedings

      • The introduction of ‘paper committals’ (1967)

      • Reform or abolition?

      • The Runciman Royal Commission

      • Apparent abolition – Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, s. 44

      • Abolition of committal proceedings for indictable-only offences

      • Transfer proceedings to replace committal

    • 13. The voluntary bill of indictment

    • 14. Case management and pre-trial preparation

      • Pre-trial hearings

        • Plea and case management hearings (PCMH)

        • Preparatory hearings under the Criminal Justice Act 1987, ss. 7–10 for serious or complex fraud cases

        • Preparatory hearings under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA)

        • Pre-trial rulings

        • Magistrates’ courts – early administrative hearing (EAH)

        • Magistrates’ courts – pre-trial review (PTR)

        • Empirical evidence about the value of pre-trial hearings

        • Auld on pre-trial hearings

        • Auld on ‘pre-trial assessment’

      • Sanctions as a management tool in criminal justice

      • Case Preparation Project

    • 15. Preparation of cases by the defence

    • 16. Delays in criminal cases

      • Time limits

        • Overall time limits

        • Custody time limits

        • Extension of custody time limits(sup[748])

      • Stay of prosecution because of delay

    • 17. Publicity and contempt of court

      • Publicity before criminal proceedings are active

      • Publicity when criminal proceedings are active

      • Proceedings to enforce the law

      • Reporting of committal and transfer proceedings

      • Publicity at the time of the trial prejudicing a retrial

      • Power to order postponement of reports

      • Publishing material not heard by the jury

      • Research evidence as to the (minimal) effect of pre-trial publicity

      • Anonymity for victims (and defendants) in sexual offence cases

      • No reporting of names of vulnerable witnesses – the Government climbs down

  • Chapter 4 The trial process

    • 1. The adversary system compared with the inquisitorial

      • The adversary system

        • Judicial intervention

        • Calling witnesses

      • Modifications or exceptions to the adversary system

        • Civil court acting of its own motion

        • Small claims hearings

        • Where the interests of children are concerned

        • Prosecution disclosure

        • Duties of the defence

        • Duties of an expert witness

        • Professional rules of conduct

        • Lord Woolf and the Runciman Royal Commission on the adversary system

      • The inquisitorial system

      • Tribunals

      • FURTHER READING

    • 2. Does being represented make a difference?

      • Representation in magistrates’ courts

      • Representation in small claims cases

      • Representation in tribunals

    • 3. Handicaps of the unrepresented

      • In the lower courts

      • In tribunals

      • Litigants in person

        • The Otton Working Party on litigants in person in the Royal Courts

        • Moorhead and Sefton report

    • 4. Establishing the facts: the unreliability of human testimony

      • Perjury

      • Human fallibility

    • 5. The principle of orality

    • 6. The taking of evidence

    • 7. Justice should be conducted in public

      • Physical access to court proceedings

      • Are small claims hearings in public?

      • Special measures directions

      • Access to court documents and the judgment

      • Physical access to proceedings in chambers

      • Reporting of judicial proceedings

        • Televising trials

      • Protecting the witness

        • Special measures directions for vulnerable witnesses(sup[199])

    • 8. The exclusionary rules of evidence

      • Evidence excluded because it might be unduly prejudicial

        • Bad character and prior convictions

          • Empirical evidence

          • Auld report (2001)

          • The Government’s White Paper (2002)

          • The Criminal Justice Act 2003

          • Criticism of the bad character provisions

          • Use of prior convictions in civil proceedings

      • Evidence excluded because it is inherently unreliable

        • Children

          • Children’s evidence on oath

          • Children’s unsworn evidence

          • Recent reforms

          • Competence

          • The oath

          • Corroboration

        • Persons of defective intellect

        • Parties

        • Spouses of parties

        • Hearsay evidence

          • Exceptions to the hearsay rule

          • Reform of the hearsay rule in civil cases

          • Reform of the hearsay rule in criminal cases

        • Identification evidence

        • Judicial warnings regarding uncorroborated evidence

        • Judicial warnings regarding cell confessions

      • Evidence excluded because its admissibility would be against the public interest

        • The evidence of spouses in criminal cases

        • Evidence that might incriminate the witness

        • The accused is not a compellable witness

        • Legal professional privilege

        • Evidence obtained at a ‘trial within a trial’

        • To protect police informers

        • Cross-examination of rape victims

        • Phone tap evidence

        • Evidence obtained by improper means

          • Confessions

          • Evidence, including confessions, illegally or improperly obtained

      • The ECHR and the fairness of trials

      • Abuse of process

  • Chapter 5 The jury

    • 1. The origins of the jury system

    • 2. Eligibility for jury service

      • Composition of the jury list

      • Those ineligible, disqualified or excused

    • 3. The process of jury selection

    • 4. Challenging of jurors

      • Peremptory challenge

      • Challenge for cause

        • The judge’s discretion

        • Questionnaires for jury selection

        • Jury selection and pre-trial publicity

        • Procedure for challenge for cause

      • Stand by for the Crown

      • Juries and the problem of race

      • Jury vetting

        • Use made of jury vetting

    • 5. The size of the jury

    • 6. Who serves on juries?

    • 7. The extent to which juries are used

      • Civil cases

        • Juries for libel and slander cases – the Faulks Committee

        • Juries and damages in defamation cases

      • Criminal cases

    • 8. Aids to the jury

    • 9. The quality of jury decision-making

    • 10. Respective roles of judge and jury

      • Summing up the law

      • Summing up on the facts

      • Directing an acquittal

      • Directing a conviction

      • Should the jury be prohibited from returning a perverse verdict?

      • Asking the jury questions

      • Is the jury’s unreasoned verdict compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights?

    • 11. Majority jury verdicts

    • 12. Retrials on jury disagreement

    • 13. Will the courts consider what happened in the jury room?

    • 14. Publication of the secrets of the jury room

    • 15. Does the jury acquit too many defendants?

    • 16. Trial on indictment without a jury

      • ‘Diplock courts’ in Northern Ireland

      • Defendant allowed to opt for trial by judge alone

      • Non-jury courts for fraud and other complex trials

        • Lord Justice Auld’s report

        • The White Paper

        • The Criminal Justice Act 2003

      • Trial by judge alone because of jury tampering

      • Trial by jury of sample counts only

      • Young defendants

    • 17. The operation of the jury (and trials) in former times

    • FURTHER READING ON THE JURY SYSTEM

  • Chapter 6 Costs and the funding of legal proceedings

    • 1. The new rules

      • Who pays?

      • Factors to be taken into account in assessing the amount of costs

      • Assessment (formerly ‘taxation’)

        • The different bases of costs

        • Non-contentious costs

    • 2. Controls on costs

      • ‘Between party’ and ‘solicitor and own client’ assessment of costs

      • Fixed costs

      • Scale fees

      • Pre-emptive cost capping orders

      • Remuneration certificates in non-contentious matters

      • Legal aid work

      • Wasted costs orders

    • 3. Should costs follow the event?

      • Civil cases

        • The costs-follows-the-event rule and group actions

        • The costs liability of non-parties

      • Criminal cases

    • 4. Exceptions to the rule that costs follow the event

      • No costs in small claims in county courts

      • Legal aid cases

      • Some costs of litigant in person

      • Where the winner is not liable to pay – the indemnity principle

      • Contemptuous damages

      • Family law ancillary relief applications

      • Public interest cases

    • 5. The legal aid system

      • Introduction

      • (1) The civil legal aid scheme

        • The nature of provision

        • The funding priorities

        • Exclusions from the scheme

        • Exceptions to the exclusions

        • The merits test

        • The means test and contributions

        • The statutory charge

          • Legal Help

          • Help at Court

          • Immigration and asylum work

        • The system in operation

        • Quality control

        • Peer review

        • Specialist Support reprieved

      • (2) Criminal legal aid(sup[205])

        • The merits test

        • The means test and contributions

        • Very High Cost cases

        • Duty solicitor schemes in magistrates’ courts

        • Duty solicitor schemes in police stations

        • Public defenders

      • Law centres

      • Legal aid for tribunals?

      • The not-for-profit sector in legal services

      • The declining proportion of the population eligible for civil legal aid

      • Why has the cost of criminal legal aid risen so much?

      • Where now with the funding of legal aid?

        • Competitive tendering(sup[283])

      • The Carter Review

        • The DCA/LSC’s consultation paper

        • The Bar’s reaction

        • The Law Society’s reaction

        • The Government’s decision

        • Criminal legal aid

        • Civil Legal Aid

        • Amending the duty solicitor arrangements

      • International comparisons

        • Other recent publications on legal aid

    • 6. Conditional fees and contingency fees

      • CFAs – the history (1989–1995)

      • CFAs – the start

      • Recoverability of success fees and insurance premiums

      • Claims management companies

      • ‘Costs wars’

      • CFAs – the balance sheet

      • The courts and contingency arrangements

      • Should contingency fees be permitted?

      • Contingency Legal Aid Fund (CLAF)

      • FURTHER READING

    • 7. Legal expenses insurance (LEI)

    • 8. Pro bono work done by the profession

  • Chapter 7 Appeals

    • 1. The structure of appeal courts

      • Civil cases

        • Radical reform of civil appeals following Bowman

      • Criminal cases

      • The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

    • 2. The appeal process

      • A right to appeal?

        • Civil cases

        • Criminal cases

      • Appeals by the prosecution

        • Abolition of the double jeopardy rule

          • The Criminal Justice Act 2003, ss. 75–97

      • Practice and procedure of appeals

        • The procedure for civil appeals

          • Applying for leave

        • The procedure for criminal appeals

          • Applying for leave

          • Time loss rules

          • Legal advice for appellants in criminal cases

        • Appeals by way of case stated

        • Leapfrog appeals

          • To the House of Lords

          • To the Court of Appeal Civil Division

          • To the Court of Appeal Criminal Division

        • General

        • Skeleton arguments

        • Restrictions on oral argument?

    • 3. Appeal decisions

      • The grounds of appeal

        • Only one appeal

      • Powers of the Court of Appeal

        • Court of Appeal Civil Division

        • Court of Appeal Criminal Division

      • The grounds for allowing appeals

        • Civil cases

          • Pre-CPR

          • Post-CPR

        • Criminal cases

        • Cooper and the ‘lurking doubt’ test

          • Report of the Runciman Royal Commission

          • Do appeal judges have the time it takes?

        • Quashing the jury’s verdict on account of error at trial

        • Quashing the jury’s verdict on account of pre-trial malpractice or procedural irregularity

        • Applying ‘the proviso’

        • The redrafting of s. 2

      • The power to receive fresh evidence

      • New points taken on appeal

      • The power to order retrials

      • In fresh evidence cases should the Court of Appeal order retrials or decide for itself?

      • Does the criminal appeal system make sense?

    • 4. Dealing with alleged miscarriage of justice cases

      • Powers of the Home Secretary

        • Free pardon

        • Conditional pardon

        • Remission

        • Reference to the Court of Appeal Criminal Division under the Criminal Appeal

        • Act 1907, s. 17

        • Other powers

      • Principles upon which the Home Secretary exercised his powers

      • The case for an independent body

        • The Runciman Royal Commission

      • The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

      • FURTHER READING

      • Compensation for wrongful conviction

        • The Home Secretary’s statement of April 2006

  • Chapter 8 The legal profession

    • 1. The component parts of the profession

      • The Bar

        • Origin

        • Inns of Court

        • Entry and training

        • Numbers at the Bar and recruitment

        • Chambers

        • The barrister’s clerk

        • Queen’s (or King’s) Counsel

        • Partnerships among barristers

        • Women at the Bar

        • Ethnic minorities at the Bar

        • Circuits

        • Advertising by barristers

        • Management of the Bar

        • Employed and ‘non-practising’ barristers

      • The solicitors’ branch

        • Origin and history

        • Entry and training

        • Number of solicitors

        • The structure of the solicitors’ profession

        • Legal executives

        • The distribution of solicitors’ offices in the community

        • Women in the solicitors’ profession

        • Ethnic minorities in the solicitors’ profession

        • Management of the solicitors’ branch

    • 2. The divided profession

      • Transfer between the two branches

    • 3. Law centres

    • 4. The use of solicitors, and clients’ perceptions

    • 5. Reform of the profession – current issues

      • Rights of audience for lawyers

      • Rights of audience for non-lawyers

      • Conducting litigation

      • Claims assessors

      • Legal Services Consultative Panel

      • Right of direct access to the Bar for professional and lay clients

      • Non-practising employed barristers

      • Queen’s Counsel

        • Should QCs continue to exist?

      • BarMark and Quality Mark

      • Partnerships between lawyers and between lawyers and non-lawyers

        • Partnerships between barristers

        • Partnerships between barristers and members of other professions

        • MNPs and MDPs for solicitors

      • Incorporation and limited liability partnerships (LLPs)

      • Conveyancing

      • Probate

      • Cost information and client care

      • Complaints

      • EU lawyers – reciprocal rights(sup[326])

      • From the Clementi Review to the Legal Services Bill

        • The regulatory system

        • Complaints

        • Alternative Business Structures

        • NB The Legal Services Bill and resources for research

      • Clementi – what has happened?

        • The Bar Council and the Law Society separate regulatory from representational functions

        • Prospects for Alternative Business Structures

      • The Northern Ireland ‘Clementi’ takes a different view

        • Regulation

        • Complaints

        • Alternative business structures

        • Conclusion

        • Competition: other aspects

      • The Irish Competition Authority follows Clementi

      • Reform of the regulation of legal services in Scotland

  • Index

Nội dung

This page intentionally left blank Cases and Materials on the English Legal System Combining materials from a wide variety of sources with Michael Zander’s authoritative commentary, this book provides the tools with which an observer of the English legal system can discover how it functions, the problems it faces and the current reforms proposed. The organisation of the trial courts, the problems of civil litigation, the balance between the citizen and state in criminal cases, the trial and appeal process including the basic rules of evidence, the jury, the cost and funding of legal proceedings and the present state of the legal profession are explored by the author drawing on a wealth of cases, reports of official and other bodies, parliamentary debates and the fruits of empirical research. The tenth edition has been extensively revised with a mass of new material. Major developments since the ninth edition include: the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, new research on the effect of the Woolf reforms, the Criminal Procedure Rules 2005, significant changes to PACE and revised PACE Codes (January 2006), the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 and the Terrorism Act 2006, new arrange- ments for the charging of suspects, the Disclosure Protocol 2006, the suspect’s right to ask for an indication of sentence, general eligibility for jury service, the introduction of fixed fees for some categories of litigation, Lord Carter’s Review of the procurement of legal aid (July 2006) and the 2006 consultation paper Legal Aid: A Sustainable Future?, the new system for appointing QCs, the Clementi Review of regulation of legal services (2004) and the Legal Services Bill (2006). There have also been a large number of new cases. Michael Zander QC is Emeritus Professor of Law at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He was a member of the Runciman Royal Commission on Criminal Justice which reported in 1993. An established author and researcher, he is also a regular journalist, a frequent broadcaster on radio and television, and is recognised as the leading authority on the workings of the legal system. [...]... Introduction (1) The civil legal aid scheme The nature of provision The funding priorities Exclusions from the scheme Exceptions to the exclusions The merits test The means test and contributions The statutory charge Legal Help’ ‘Help at Court’ Immigration and asylum work The system in operation Quality control Peer review Specialist Support reprieved (2) The criminal legal aid scheme The merits test The. .. Division under the Criminal Appeal Act 1907, s.17 Other powers The principles upon which the Home Secretary exercised his powers The case for an independent body The Runciman Royal Commission The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) Compensation for wrongful conviction 714 716 718 719 720 720 721 721 721 721 721 722 723 725 730 CHAPTER 8 The legal profession 735 1 The component parts of the profession... this edition is the removal to footnotes of most of the references that were previously in the text There was too much clutter on the page There are also more headings to help the reader find his way But the essence of the book remains the same as it has been from the start – an exploration of the important issues involved in the operation of the legal system The book aims to convey not just the current... basic texts on points where the legal system is under stress or is the subject of controversy The aim is to give a better understanding of the reality of the law in action Michael Zander July 1972, London Acknowledgements All the materials in the book appear here with the permission of those who hold the copyright I wish to express my sincere gratitude to all the individuals and institutions who have... authors MZ February 2007, London Preface to the first edition This book is concerned with dispute settlement in courts and tribunals in England and Wales The aim is to make available a selection of materials which reveal the actual workings of the system, its problems and difficulties, and which suggest ways in which it might be improved The emphasis is contemporary and critical The materials selected come... agencies and police Seizure of evidence The Philips Royal Commission PACE The power to freeze the suspect’s assets 7 The prosecution process The police have a wide discretion Class bias in prosecutions Proposals for an independent prosecution process The Philips Royal Commission The Government’s response The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) The Glidewell Report The Government’s response to Glidewell The. .. Justice Quarterly, the Criminal Law Review and the Criminal Appeal Reports; to the Law Quarterly Review, Legal Action, the Magistrate, the Modern Law Review, the Solicitor’s Journal, the Law Guardian, the New Law Journal, the Law Society’s Gazette, the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, New Society, The Times and The Guardian The Social Administration Research Trust gave permission for use of... chapter on the judges I considered including it in this volume but decided, partly on grounds of the length of the book, that it would be better to introduce it into the next edition of the companion volume, The Law Making Process Probably the most important change between the first and this tenth edition is the different balance between excerpted material and the author’s own text The preface to the first... higher proportion of the book has consisted of the author’s own text There have been a great number of developments since the ninth edition – far too many to list here Some of the main ones include the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, new research on the effect of the Woolf reforms, the White Paper on unifying the civil courts, the Criminal Procedure Rules 2005, significant changes to PACE and revised PACE... Stand by for the Crown Juries and the problem of race Jury vetting The use made of jury vetting 493 493 494 496 497 497 498 498 500 501 5 The size of the jury 502 6 Who serves on juries? 502 7 The extent to which juries are used Civil cases Juries for libel and slander casesthe Faulks Committeee Juries and damages in defamation cases Criminal cases 503 503 507 507 509 8 Aids to the jury 510 9 The . Imagination Zander: Cases and Materials on the English Legal System Zander: The Law-Making Process Cases and Materials on the English Legal System Tenth Edition MICHAEL ZANDER QC FBA Emeritus. the citizen and state in criminal cases, the trial and appeal process including the basic rules of evidence, the jury, the cost and funding of legal proceedings and the present state of the legal. legal aid (July 2006) and the 2006 consultation paper Legal Aid: A Sustainable Future?, the new system for appointing QCs, the Clementi Review of regulation of legal services (2004) and the Legal

Ngày đăng: 30/03/2014, 02:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

w