Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 13 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
13
Dung lượng
187,28 KB
Nội dung
AirPollution Control Philosophies
Part I AirPollution:-EffectsOfPollutants
And PublicPolicy Concern
2103555 Engine and Emissions Control
Air Pollution Control Philosophies
• The wish of all concerned with airpollution is to have a
completely unpolluted environment at no cost to
anyone.
• An airpollution control philosophy is a fundamental set
of ideas about how one determines what constitutes an
appropriately clean environment, appropriate cost, and
appropriate distribution of that cost.
Air Pollution Control Philosophies
• A perfect airpollution philosophy and its implementing
regulations are
– cost effective : gains maximum possible benefits.
(reduced damages and discomforts) for the resources
expended on pollution control.
– simple
– enforceable
– flexible : enable to deal with special difficulties. And,
– evolutionary : enables us to utilize new information
on the effectsofpollutionand new developments in
control technology without major overhauls of our
legal structure or major revisions of existing plants.
The Four Philosophies
Most of all airpollution regulations are based
directly or indirectly on these four philosophies
(a) Emission standards
(b) Air quality standards
are currently use in many part of the world
(c) Emission taxes
(d) Cost – benefit standard
Mostly been the subject of academic
publications (not had much practical testing)
Comparison of The Four Philosophies
Good.GoodFairFair Evolutionary ability
UnknownUnnecessaryFairPoor Flexibility
UnknownExcellentFairExcellent Enforceability
TerribleExcellent PoorExcellent Simplicity
ExcellentFairGoodVery bad Cost effectiveness
Cost – benefit
Analysis
Emission
Taxes
Air quality
Standards
Emission
Standards
Desirable
Quality
Emission Standard Philosophy
• “There is some maximum possible (or practical)
degree of emission control.”
• This degree varies between various classes of
emitters (eg. autos, cement plants) if this degree
of control is determined, and every member is
required to limit emissions to this maximum
degree possible, then the pollutant emission rate
will be the lowest possible.
• THUS THIS MIGHT BE CALLED “A Cleanest
possible air philosophy”
Emission Standard Philosophy
Examples (New source performance standards [NSPS] )
as 1998 version of 40CFR60
Coal – fired power plants, may not emit the following to
the atmosphere:
Particulate matter more than 0.03 lb/106 Btu or
1% of ash solids in the fuel, whichever is less.
Sulfer dioxide more than 1.2 lb/106 Btu, or more
than 30% of SO2 that would be formed if all the
sulfer in the coal were converted to SO2
whichever is less.
Nitrogen oxides more than 0.6 lb/106 Btu for most
coals or 0.5 lb/106 BTU for sub - bituminous coal.
Air Quality Standard Philosophy
• The air quality standard is logically called a
“Zero-damage” philosophy.
• This is based on assumption that the true
situation for most major airpollutants is the
threshold value situation
.
Air Quality Standard Philosophy
Flow diagram representation of NAAQS process
Emission Tax Philosophy
• Laws based on an emission tax philosophy would tax
each emitter of major pollutants according to its emission
rate;
– e.g. X cents per pound of pollutant Y for all emitters.
• This tax rate would be set so that most major polluters
would find it more economical to install pollution control
equipment than pay the taxes.
• Emission taxes have also been proposed in combination
with air quality standard philosophy : in this combination,
emission taxes would act as an added incentive to
reduce emissions to lower levels than those required to
meet air quality standards.
• Air Quality Standard and Emission taxes would work in
parallel.
[...]...Cost-Benefit Philosophy • This philosophy suggests that we attempt to decide in as rational a manner as possible, – how much damage we should accept and – how much we should be willing to spend to reduce damages to this level Cost-Benefit Philosophy • The idea is illustrated in Figure 12 below: Cost-Benefit Philosophy • The ambient air concentration can be reduced by airpollution control... concentration can be reduced by airpollution control expenditures • The control cost goes up steeply as the ambient air concentration becomes small • The Minimum occurs when the slopes of the two cost curves are equal and opposite, or d ( Pollution control costs + Pollution damage costs) =0 d (ambient airpollution concentration) . Air Pollution Control Philosophies Part I Air Pollution : - Effects Of Pollutants And Public Policy Concern 2103555 Engine and Emissions Control Air Pollution Control Philosophies •. appropriate cost, and appropriate distribution of that cost. Air Pollution Control Philosophies • A perfect air pollution philosophy and its implementing regulations are – cost effective : gains maximum. the effects of pollution and new developments in control technology without major overhauls of our legal structure or major revisions of existing plants. The Four Philosophies Most of all air