Ind. J. Tub., 1984, 31, 164
PREVALENCE OFINITIALDRUGRESISTANCEAMONGPATIENTS ATTENDING
THE CLINICSINMADRAS CITY
K.V.
KRISHNASWAMI
*, R.
VENKATESAN
**
AND
R.
PARTHASARATHY
***
Summary: Sputum culture of 803 smear positive peases of pulmonary tuberculosis attending for
the first time at the five Chest Clinics located in different parts of Madras, was positive m 750. These
were further subjected to drug sensitivity tests’, 24.1% cultures were resistant to one drug, 17.6% to
two drugs and 3.3% to three drugs, giving a total initialdrugresistanceof 45%.
Total initialresistance to Isoniazid was 28.9 %, significantly higher than for any other drug.
In the case of Ethambutol and Streptomycin, it was 18.7% and 17.9% respectively. Total initial
resistance to Rifampicin was found to be the lowest as compared to all other drugs.
Introduction
Fairly large proportion ofpatientsattending
for the first time the Chest Clinicsin India have
had anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy for some
time though irregularly. The assessment ofthe
prevalence ofInitialDrugResistance (IDR)
among these patients will be of great value in
their management and also in formulating
general policies of treatment inthe Chest
Clinics under the National Tuberculosis Control
Programme.
Material and Methods
Chest symptomatics attending for the first
time at the five Chest Clinics located in different
parts ofMadras City, over a period of three
months, from 1st March 1982 till the end of
May 1982, were investigated, irrespective of
whether they had previous chemotherapy or
not.
A preliminary skiagram ofthe chest was
taken and those with suggestive pulmonary
shadows were subjected to detailed bacterio-
logical investigations commencing with sputum
smears. Two spot and one overnight sputum
specimens were examined for Acid Fast Bacilli
by Ziehl Neelsen procedure. For all the sputum
smear positive cases, culture for M. Tuber-
culosis and drug sensitivity tests were carried
out.
Culture
The technique adopted for culture of M.
Tuberculosis was described by Tuberculosis
Chemotherapy Centre (1959). Two sputum
specimens, one spot and one overnight, were
used.
The following identification tests for M.
Tuberculosis were done:
(a) Niacin production test (Medveczky
1960);
(b) Qualitative test for catalase activity
(Selkon and Mitchison 1959);
(c) Pigmentation and Morphology of growth
after incubation at 37°C for 6 weeks
in the dark and exposed to .light.
Drug Sensitivity Tests
One positive culture from each patient was
subjected to drug sensitivity tests. The drugs
and their concentrations used for the tests were
as follows:
Drug Concentration
1,2,4,16,32, & 64
0,2,1,5,
1,1.4,2,2.8,4,5.6,8,11.2 & 16
5,10,20,28.5,40,57,80, 114
Drug
Streptomycin
Isoniazid
Ethambutol
Ethionamide
Rifampicin
1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128.
A standard (approx. 3 mm) loopful ofthe
appropriate suspension was inoculated on
Lowenstein-Jensen slopes containing thedrug
concentrations and simultaneously on a drug
free slope as control. The standard strain of
H
37
Rv was also set up with each batch of tests.
The results were read at the end of 6 weeks of
incubation at 37°C.
The results for Isoniazid, Ethambutol,
Ethionamide and Rifampicin were expressed
as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
of the drugs inhibiting growth while those of
Streptomycin was expressed as resistance ratio
(RR).
*Formerly Professor of TB & Chest Diseases, Madras Medical College and Director, Institute of TB & Chest
Diseases, Madras.
**Non-medical Tutor in Microbiology ‘“Statistician
PREVALENCE OFINITIALDRUGRESISTANCEAMONGPATIENTSATTENDINGTHECLINICSINMADRAS 165
The MIC and RR indicative ofDrug Resi-
tance are detailed in Table-I.
TABLE 1
Criteria for DrugResistance
Results
Seven hundred and fifty specimens of
sputa yielded positive cultures (93%4%) from
among the 803 smear positives investigated.
The culture was negative in 19 smears and
contaminated in 23.
•
TABLE
2
Pattern ofDrug Resistance
No. Percentage
Sensitive cases 412 54.9
Resistance to one Drug 181 24.1
Resistance to two Drugs 132 17.6
Resistance to three Drugs 25 3.3
Total 750 99.9
Eleven specimens showed unclassified
mycobacteria.
Analysis ofthe pattern ofInitialDrug
Resistance (IDR) amongthe 750 positive cultures
(Table 2) shows that 181 (24.1 %) were resistant
to a single drug and 132 (17.6%) were resistant
to two drugs, the difference being statistically
significant (P<0.01).
A small number ofpatients (3.3%) were
found to be resistant to three drugs, the
differance again being significant (P<0.01) in
comparison to both for single and two drugs.
Of the 750 cases identified as Drug Resistant
cases, a high proportion of 28.9% (Table 3)
were found to be resistant to Isoniazid,
which is significantly higher than the propor-
tions ofresistance to any other drug (P<0.01)
in all instances. The proportions ofresistance
to Ethambutol and Streptomycin were 18.7%
and 17.9% respectively, the difference between
which was not found to be statistically signifi-
cant. But these proportions were significantly
higher than those for Ethionamide and
Rifampicin. Resistance to Ethionamide and
Rifampicin were found to be ofthe order of
2.8% and 1.1% respectively with a signifi-
cant difference (P<0.01). IDR for all the four
drugs was found to be significantly higher
than Rifampicin (P<0.01) in all instances).
But still it is to be noted that 8 cases showed
IDR to Rifampicin, a sheet anchor for Short
Course Chemotherapy.
TABLE 3
Drug Resistance to Individual Drugs
Drug
Resistant Cases
No. Percentage
Isoniazid
217 28.9
Ethambutol 140 18.7
Streptomycin 134 17.9
Ethionamide 21 2.8
Rifampicin
8 1.1
Single drugresistance was seen only for
Isoniazid, Ethambutol & Streptomycin (Table 4)
and not for the other two drugs, viz. Ethiona-
mide and Rifampicin. Among those with single
drug resistance, IDR to Isoniazid was signifi-
cantly higher (P<0.01) than that for Etham-
butol and Streptomycin. The difference between
the proportions of cases resistant to Ethambutol
and Streptomycin is not statistically signifi-
cant.
Among the 132 patients who were identified
as being resistant to two drugs initially, the
proportions ofresistance to Ethambutol &
INH and Streptomycin & INH were the highest
viz. 40.9% and 34.9% respectively (Table 5).
Name ofDrug Minimum Inhi-
bitary concent-
ration
Resistant Ratio
Streptomycin
— 8 & more
Isoniazid
5 & more
Ethambutol
8 & more
Ethionamide
80 & more
Rifampicin
128 & more
166
K.V. KRISHNASWAMI, R. VENKATESAN AND R. PARTHASARATHY
TABLE
4
Single Drug Resistance
Drug
No. Resistant
Percentage
Isoniazid
96
53.0
Ethambutol
45
24.9
Streptomycin
40
22.1
Total
181
100.00
Of the 25 cases who had been found resis-
tant initially to three anti-TB drugs. (Table 6)
8 cases (32 %) were resistant to the three drugs
Streptomycin, Ethambutol and Ethionamide
and 6 cases (24%) to Streptomycin, Isoniazid
and Ethambutol.
Discussion
Initial drugresistance includes (a) naturally
occurring drug resistant mutants, a small insigni-
ficant group, (b) primary drug resistance, i.e.
those infected with drug resistant bacilli, while
not having had the particular drugs themselves
and (c) Acquired resistancein those who have
had chemotherapy knowingly or unknowingly
I do not admit it. Assessment of IDR will
TABLE
5
Two-Drug Resistance
Drugs
No. Resistant
Percentage
Ethambutol & Isoniazid
54
40.9
Streptomycin & Isonizid
46
34.9
Streptomycin & Ethambutol
22
16.7
Streptomycin & Ethionamide
6
4.6
Rifampicin & Isoniazid
4
3.0
Total
132
100.0
TABLE
6
Three-Drug Resistance
Drugs
No. Resistant
Percentage
Streptomycin, Ethambutol & Ethionamide
8
32.0
Streptomycin, Isoniazid & Ethambutol
6
24.0
Isoniazid, Ethambutol & Ethionamide
4
16.0
Streptomycin, Isoniazid & Rifampicin
3
12.0
Streptomycin, Isoniazid & Ethionamide
3
12.0
Ethambutol, Isoniazid & Rifampicin
1
4.0
Total
25
100.0
PREVALENCE OFINITIALDRUGRESISTANCEAMONGPATIENTSATTENDINGCLINICSIN MADRAS
167
therefore give good indication ofthe prevalent
practice of chemotherapy and the extent of
patients compliance and consequent possible
reduction inthe therapeutic effectiveness of
the drugs routinely used for the treatment of
patients under the National Tuberculosis
Programme. The W:H.O. Expert Committee
on Tuberculosis (IX Report) opined that failure
to respond to the standard regimen of chemo-
therapy because of I.D.R.is more likely to occur
in patients with strains resistant to 2 or all
three drugs inthe regimen than those with
resistant to one drug only.
The Indian Council of Medical Research
Second DrugResistance Investigation (1969)
estimated theprevalenceofdrugresistancein
patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis present-
ing for the first time with symptoms at urban
chest clinicsin India with or without history
of previous chemotherapy.
Madras was one ofthe 9 centres participating
in this study. Considering all the centres, 25 %
of thepatients had resistance to Isoniazid and
22.9% to Streptomycin; 15.8% were resistant
to both the drugs. In other words, 32 % ofthe
patients had resistance to either one or both of
these potent drugs. At theMadras Center (The
Institute of Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases),
the IDR findings were 18% for Isoniazid,
15% for Streptomycin and 10% for both and
23% for either or both the drugs in ICMR
study. Inthe present study it was observed that
28.9% ofthepatients were resistant to Isonia-
zid, 17.9% to Streptomycin and 7.7% to both
the drugs and 25.7 % for either one or both the
drugs.
Subbammal (1975) reported IDR of 9.1%
for Isoniazid and 4.3 % for both Streptomycin
and Isoniazid from amongthe cases selected
for chemotherapy trials during 1973-74.
The patients comprised largely of those who
had not had previous chemotherapy and the
prevalence figures were therefore close to those
of Primary Drug Resistance.
In a previous study (Krishnaswamy, and
Abdul Rahim, 1976) prevalenceof Primary
Drug Resistance was reported to be 10.6%
for Isoniazid, 9.5% for Streptomycin and
4.7% for both, which proportions were more
or less similar to those reported by the Tuber-
culosis Chemotherapy Centre (Subbammal,
1975).
The salient findings inthe present study arc:
1. A sizeable proportion (17.6%) of bacillary
resistance to two drugs was observed among
the freshly reporting bacillary cases;
2. Total resistance to Ethambutol (18.7%)
and Streptomycin (17.9%) was almost
similar.
3. Total Resistance to Rifampicin was 1.1%.
The above findings call for similar studies
in other centres inthe country.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Director of Medical Edu-
cation, Tamilnadu, Smt. K. Rukmani, Steno-
typist and the staff ofthe Laboratory ofthe
Institute of Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases.
REFERENCES
Indian Council of Medical Research: Prevalenceof
Drug Resistanceinpatients with Pulmonary Tuber-
culosis presenting for the first time with symptom at
chest clinicsin India Part; II, Findings in Urban clinics
among all patients with or without history of previous
chemotherapy; Ind. Jour. Med. Research 1969,
57, 823-835.
Krishnaswamy, K.V. and Abdul Rahim, M: Primary
Drug Resistancein Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Ind.
Jour. Chest Diseases, 1976,18, 233-237.
Medveczky, E: A micro method for the routine differentia-
tion of human tubercle bacilli from other mycobac-
terin in primary cultures: Am. Rev. Resp. Dis.;
I960, 81, 757.
Selkon, J.B. and Mitchison, D.A. : Atypical myco-
bacteria and drug resistant tubercle bacilli isolated
during a survey of untreated patients with pulmonary
tuberculosis; Tubercle; 1959, 40, 141.
Subbammal, S: PrevalenceofInitialDrugResistancein
patients attendingthe Tuberculosis Chemotherapy
Centre: Paper presented at the 30th National Con-
ference on Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases; 1975.
Tuberculosis Chemotherapy Centre—Concurrent com-
parison of home and sanatorium treatment of
Pulmonary Tuberculosis in South India; Wld. Hlth.
Org. 1959, 21-51.
W.H.O. Expert Committee in
Report, Technical Report
204.2.10.
Tuberculosis, Ninth
Series 1974
,
552
,
. assessment of the prevalence of Initial Drug Resistance (IDR) among these patients will be of great value in their management and also in formulating general policies of treatment in the Chest Clinics. Diseases, Madras. **Non-medical Tutor in Microbiology ‘“Statistician PREVALENCE OF INITIAL DRUG RESISTANCE AMONG PATIENTS ATTENDING THE CLINICS IN MADRAS 165 The MIC and RR indicative of Drug. PREVALENCE OF INITIAL DRUG RESISTANCE AMONG PATIENTS ATTENDING CLINICS IN MADRAS 167 therefore give good indication of the prevalent practice of chemotherapy and the extent of patients compliance