Novel Drug Delivery Systems: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Yie W.. Dermal Absorption and Toxicity Assessment, edited by Michael S.. Percutaneous Absorption: Drugs–Cosmetics–Mecha
Trang 2Dermal Absorption and Toxicity Assessment
Trang 3A Series of Textbooks and Monographs
Executive EditorJames SwarbrickPharmaceuTech, Inc
Pinehurst, North Carolina
Advisory BoardLarry L Augsburger
University of Maryland Baltimore, Maryland
Ajaz Hussain
Sandoz Princeton, New Jersey
Yuichi Sugiyama
University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Geoffrey T Tucker
University of Sheffield Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, United Kingdom
Jeffrey A Hughes
University of Florida College
of Pharmacy Gainesville, Florida
Vincent H L Lee
US FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Los Angeles, California
Kinam Park
Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana
Jerome P Skelly
Alexandria, Virginia
Elizabeth M Topp
University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas
Trang 42 Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceuticals: A Plan for Total Quality Control,Sidney H Willig, Murray M Tuckerman, and William S Hitchings IV
3 Microencapsulation, edited by J R Nixon
4 Drug Metabolism: Chemical and Biochemical Aspects, Bernard Testa and
Peter Jenner
5 New Drugs: Discovery and Development, edited by Alan A Rubin
6 Sustained and Controlled Release Drug Delivery Systems, edited by
Joseph R Robinson
7 Modern Pharmaceutics, edited by Gilbert S Banker and Christopher T Rhodes
8 Prescription Drugs in Short Supply: Case Histories, Michael A Schwartz
9 Activated Charcoal: Antidotal and Other Medical Uses, David O Cooney
10 Concepts in Drug Metabolism (in two parts), edited by Peter Jenner and
Bernard Testa
11 Pharmaceutical Analysis: Modern Methods (in two parts), edited by
James W Munson
12 Techniques of Solubilization of Drugs, edited by Samuel H Yalkowsky
13 Orphan Drugs, edited by Fred E Karch
14 Novel Drug Delivery Systems: Fundamentals, Developmental Concepts,
Biomedical Assessments, Yie W Chien
15 Pharmacokinetics: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Milo Gibaldi andDonald Perrier
16 Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceuticals: A Plan for Total Quality Control,Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Sidney H Willig, Murray M Tuckerman,and William S Hitchings IV
17 Formulation of Veterinary Dosage Forms, edited by Jack Blodinger
18 Dermatological Formulations: Percutaneous Absorption, Brian W Barry
19 The Clinical Research Process in the Pharmaceutical Industry, edited by
Gary M Matoren
20 Microencapsulation and Related Drug Processes, Patrick B Deasy
21 Drugs and Nutrients: The Interactive Effects, edited by Daphne A Roe and
T Colin Campbell
22 Biotechnology of Industrial Antibiotics, Erick J Vandamme
23 Pharmaceutical Process Validation, edited by Bernard T Loftus and
Robert A Nash
24 Anticancer and Interferon Agents: Synthesis and Properties, edited by
Raphael M Ottenbrite and George B Butler
25 Pharmaceutical Statistics: Practical and Clinical Applications, Sanford Bolton
26 Drug Dynamics for Analytical, Clinical, and Biological Chemists, Benjamin J.Gudzinowicz, Burrows T Younkin, Jr., and Michael J Gudzinowicz
27 Modern Analysis of Antibiotics, edited by Adjoran Aszalos
28 Solubility and Related Properties, Kenneth C James
Trang 5and Expanded, edited by Joseph R Robinson and Vincent H Lee
30 New Drug Approval Process: Clinical and Regulatory Management, edited byRichard A Guarino
31 Transdermal Controlled Systemic Medications, edited by Yie W Chien
32 Drug Delivery Devices: Fundamentals and Applications, edited by Praveen Tyle
33 Pharmacokinetics: Regulatory † Industrial † Academic Perspectives, edited byPeter G Welling and Francis L S Tse
34 Clinical Drug Trials and Tribulations, edited by Allen E Cato
35 Transdermal Drug Delivery: Developmental Issues and Research Initiatives,edited by Jonathan Hadgraft and Richard H Guy
36 Aqueous Polymeric Coatings for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, edited byJames W McGinity
37 Pharmaceutical Pelletization Technology, edited by Isaac Ghebre-Sellassie
38 Good Laboratory Practice Regulations, edited by Allen F Hirsch
39 Nasal Systemic Drug Delivery, Yie W Chien, Kenneth S E Su, and Shyi-Feu Chang
40 Modern Pharmaceutics: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited byGilbert S Banker and Christopher T Rhodes
41 Specialized Drug Delivery Systems: Manufacturing and Production Technology,edited by Praveen Tyle
42 Topical Drug Delivery Formulations, edited by David W Osborne and
Anton H Amann
43 Drug Stability: Principles and Practices, Jens T Carstensen
44 Pharmaceutical Statistics: Practical and Clinical Applications, Second Edition,Revised and Expanded, Sanford Bolton
45 Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems, edited by Mark Chasin andRobert Langer
46 Preclinical Drug Disposition: A Laboratory Handbook, Francis L S Tse andJames J Jaffe
47 HPLC in the Pharmaceutical Industry, edited by Godwin W Fong and
Stanley K Lam
48 Pharmaceutical Bioequivalence, edited by Peter G Welling, Francis L S Tse,and Shrikant V Dinghe
49 Pharmaceutical Dissolution Testing, Umesh V Banakar
50 Novel Drug Delivery Systems: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Yie W Chien
51 Managing the Clinical Drug Development Process, David M Cocchetto andRonald V Nardi
52 Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceuticals: A Plan for Total Quality Control,Third Edition, edited by Sidney H Willig and James R Stoker
53 Prodrugs: Topical and Ocular Drug Delivery, edited by Kenneth B Sloan
54 Pharmaceutical Inhalation Aerosol Technology, edited by Anthony J Hickey
55 Radiopharmaceuticals: Chemistry and Pharmacology, edited by Adrian D Nunn
Trang 6Richard A Guarino
57 Pharmaceutical Process Validation: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded,edited by Ira R Berry and Robert A Nash
58 Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems, edited by Ashim K Mitra
59 Pharmaceutical Skin Penetration Enhancement, edited by Kenneth A Waltersand Jonathan Hadgraft
60 Colonic Drug Absorption and Metabolism, edited by Peter R Bieck
61 Pharmaceutical Particulate Carriers: Therapeutic Applications, edited by
Alain Rolland
62 Drug Permeation Enhancement: Theory and Applications, edited by Dean S Hsieh
63 Glycopeptide Antibiotics, edited by Ramakrishnan Nagarajan
64 Achieving Sterility in Medical and Pharmaceutical Products, Nigel A Halls
65 Multiparticulate Oral Drug Delivery, edited by Isaac Ghebre-Sellassie
66 Colloidal Drug Delivery Systems, edited by Jo¨rg Kreuter
67 Pharmacokinetics: Regulatory † Industrial † Academic Perspectives,
Second Edition, edited by Peter G Welling and Francis L S Tse
68 Drug Stability: Principles and Practices, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded,Jens T Carstensen
69 Good Laboratory Practice Regulations: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded,edited by Sandy Weinberg
70 Physical Characterization of Pharmaceutical Solids, edited by Harry G Brittain
71 Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology, edited by Go¨ran Alderborn andChrister Nystro¨m
72 Modern Pharmaceutics: Third Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by
Gilbert S Banker and Christopher T Rhodes
73 Microencapsulation: Methods and Industrial Applications, edited by Simon Benita
74 Oral Mucosal Drug Delivery, edited by Michael J Rathbone
75 Clinical Research in Pharmaceutical Development, edited by Barry Bleidt andMichael Montagne
76 The Drug Development Process: Increasing Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness,edited by Peter G Welling, Louis Lasagna, and Umesh V Banakar
77 Microparticulate Systems for the Delivery of Proteins and Vaccines, edited bySmadar Cohen and Howard Bernstein
78 Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceuticals: A Plan for Total Quality Control,Fourth Edition, Revised and Expanded, Sidney H Willig and James R Stoker
79 Aqueous Polymeric Coatings for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Second Edition,Revised and Expanded, edited by James W McGinity
80 Pharmaceutical Statistics: Practical and Clinical Applications, Third Edition,Sanford Bolton
81 Handbook of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology, edited by Dilip M Parikh
82 Biotechnology of Antibiotics: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited byWilliam R Strohl
Trang 7Richard H Guy
84 Pharmaceutical Enzymes, edited by Albert Lauwers and Simon Scharpe´
85 Development of Biopharmaceutical Parenteral Dosage Forms, edited by
John A Bontempo
86 Pharmaceutical Project Management, edited by Tony Kennedy
87 Drug Products for Clinical Trials: An International Guide to Formulation † Production
† Quality Control, edited by Donald C Monkhouse and Christopher T Rhodes
88 Development and Formulation of Veterinary Dosage Forms: Second Edition,Revised and Expanded, edited by Gregory E Hardee and J Desmond Baggot
89 Receptor-Based Drug Design, edited by Paul Leff
90 Automation and Validation of Information in Pharmaceutical Processing, edited byJoseph F deSpautz
91 Dermal Absorption and Toxicity Assessment, edited by Michael S Roberts andKenneth A Walters
92 Pharmaceutical Experimental Design, Gareth A Lewis, Didier Mathieu, andRoger Phan-Tan-Luu
93 Preparing for FDA Pre-Approval Inspections, edited by Martin D Hynes III
94 Pharmaceutical Excipients: Characterization by IR, Raman, and NMR troscopy, David E Bugay and W Paul Findlay
Spec-95 Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical Solids, edited by Harry G Brittain
96 Freeze-Drying/Lyophilization of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products, edited byLouis Rey and Joan C.May
97 Percutaneous Absorption: Drugs–Cosmetics–Mechanisms–Methodology,
Third Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by Robert L Bronaugh and
Howard I Maibach
98 Bioadhesive Drug Delivery Systems: Fundamentals, Novel Approaches, andDevelopment, edited by Edith Mathiowitz, Donald E Chickering III, and Claus-Michael Lehr
99 Protein Formulation and Delivery, edited by Eugene J McNally
100 New Drug Approval Process: Third Edition, The Global Challenge, edited byRichard A Guarino
101 Peptide and Protein Drug Analysis, edited by Ronald E Reid
102 Transport Processes in Pharmaceutical Systems, edited by Gordon L Amidon,Ping I Lee, and Elizabeth M Topp
103 Excipient Toxicity and Safety, edited by Myra L Weiner and Lois A Kotkoskie
104 The Clinical Audit in Pharmaceutical Development, edited by Michael R Hamrell
105 Pharmaceutical Emulsions and Suspensions, edited by Francoise Nielloud andGilberte Marti-Mestres
106 Oral Drug Absorption: Prediction and Assessment, edited by Jennifer B Dressmanand Hans Lennerna¨s
107 Drug Stability: Principles and Practices, Third Edition, Revised and Expanded,edited by Jens T Carstensen and C T Rhodes
108 Containment in the Pharmaceutical Industry, edited by James P Wood
Trang 8Control from Manufacturer to Consumer, Fifth Edition, Revised and Expanded,Sidney H Willig
110 Advanced Pharmaceutical Solids, Jens T Carstensen
111 Endotoxins: Pyrogens, LAL Testing, and Depyrogenation, Second Edition,Revised and Expanded, Kevin L Williams
112 Pharmaceutical Process Engineering, Anthony J Hickey and David Ganderton
113 Pharmacogenomics, edited by Werner Kalow, Urs A Meyer and Rachel F Tyndale
114 Handbook of Drug Screening, edited by Ramakrishna Seethala and
Prabhavathi B Fernandes
115 Drug Targeting Technology: Physical † Chemical † Biological Methods, edited byHans Schreier
116 Drug–Drug Interactions, edited by A David Rodrigues
117 Handbook of Pharmaceutical Analysis, edited by Lena Ohannesian and
Anthony J Streeter
118 Pharmaceutical Process Scale-Up, edited by Michael Levin
119 Dermatological and Transdermal Formulations, edited by Kenneth A Walters
120 Clinical Drug Trials and Tribulations: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded,edited by Allen Cato, Lynda Sutton, and Allen Cato III
121 Modern Pharmaceutics: Fourth Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by
Gilbert S Banker and Christopher T Rhodes
122 Surfactants and Polymers in Drug Delivery, Martin Malmsten
123 Transdermal Drug Delivery: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited byRichard H Guy and Jonathan Hadgraft
124 Good Laboratory Practice Regulations: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded,edited by Sandy Weinberg
125 Parenteral Quality Control: Sterility, Pyrogen, Particulate, and Package IntegrityTesting: Third Edition, Revised and Expanded, Michael J Akers, Daniel S.Larrimore, and Dana Morton Guazzo
126 Modified-Release Drug Delivery Technology, edited by Michael J Rathbone,Jonathan Hadgraft, and Michael S Roberts
127 Simulation for Designing Clinical Trials: A Pharmacokinetic-PharmacodynamicModeling Perspective, edited by Hui C Kimko and Stephen B Duffull
128 Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis in Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics,edited by Reinhard H H Neubert and Hans-Hermann Ru¨ttinger
129 Pharmaceutical Process Validation: An International Third Edition, Revised andExpanded, edited by Robert A Nash and Alfred H Wachter
130 Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded,edited by Ashim K Mitra
131 Pharmaceutical Gene Delivery Systems, edited by Alain Rolland and
Trang 9Expanded, edited by Anthony J Hickey
135 Pharmaceutical Statistics: Practical and Clinical Applications, Fourth Edition,Sanford Bolton and Charles Bon
136 Compliance Handbook for Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, and Biologics,edited by Carmen Medina
137 Freeze-Drying/Lyophilization of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products:
Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by Louis Rey and Joan C May
138 Supercritical Fluid Technology for Drug Product Development, edited by Peter York,Uday B Kompella, and Boris Y Shekunov
139 New Drug Approval Process: Fourth Edition, Accelerating Global Registrations,edited by Richard A Guarino
140 Microbial Contamination Control in Parenteral Manufacturing, edited by
143 Generic Drug Product Development: Solid Oral Dosage Forms, edited by
Leon Shargel and Isadore Kanfer
144 Introduction to the Pharmaceutical Regulatory Process, edited by Ira R Berry
145 Drug Delivery to the Oral Cavity: Molecules to Market, edited by Tapash K Ghoshand William R Pfister
146 Good Design Practices for GMP Pharmaceutical Facilities, edited by
Andrew Signore and Terry Jacobs
147 Drug Products for Clinical Trials, Second Edition, edited by Donald Monkhouse,Charles Carney, and Jim Clark
148 Polymeric Drug Delivery Systems, edited by Glen S Kwon
149 Injectable Dispersed Systems: Formulation, Processing, and Performance,edited by Diane J Burgess
150 Laboratory Auditing for Quality and Regulatory Compliance, Donald Singer,Raluca- Ioana Stefan, and Jacobus van Staden
151 Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients: Development, Manufacturing, and Regulation,edited by Stanley Nusim
152 Preclinical Drug Development, edited by Mark C Rogge and David R Taft
153 Pharmaceutical Stress Testing: Predicting Drug Degradation, edited by
Steven W Baertschi
154 Handbook of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology: Second Edition,
edited by Dilip M Parikh
155 Percutaneous Absorption: Drugs–Cosmetics–Mechanisms–Methodology,
Fourth Edition, edited by Robert L Bronaugh and Howard I Maibach
156 Pharmacogenomics: Second Edition, edited by Werner Kalow, Urs A Meyer andRachel F Tyndale
Trang 10158 Microencapsulation: Methods and Industrial Applications, Second Edition,
edited by Simon Benita
159 Nanoparticle Technology for Drug Delivery, edited by Ram B Gupta and
Uday B Kompella
160 Spectroscopy of Pharmaceutical Solids, edited by Harry G Brittain
161 Dose Optimization in Drug Development, edited by Rajesh Krishna
162 Herbal Supplements-Drug Interactions: Scientific and Regulatory Perspectives,edited by Y W Francis Lam, Shiew-Mei Huang, and Stephen D Hall
163 Pharmaceutical Photostability and Stabilization Technology, edited by
Joseph T.Piechocki and Karl Thoma
164 Environmental Monitoring for Cleanrooms and Controlled Environments,
edited by Anne Marie Dixon
165 Pharmaceutical Product Development: In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation, edited byDakshina Murthy Chilukuri, Gangadhar Sunkara, and David Young
166 Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems, edited by Deepak Thassu, Michel Deleers,and Yashwant Pathak
167 Endotoxins: Pyrogens, LAL Testing and Depyrogenation, Third Edition,
edited by Kevin L Williams
168 Good Laboratory Practice Regulations, Fourth Edition, edited by
Anne Sandy Weinberg
169 Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceuticals, Sixth Edition, edited byJoseph D Nally
170 Oral-Lipid Based Formulations: Enhancing the Bioavailability of Poorly
Water-soluble Drugs, edited by David J Hauss
171 Handbook of Bioequivalence Testing, edited by Sarfaraz K Niazi
172 Advanced Drug Formulation Design to Optimize Therapeutic Outcomes,
edited by Robert O Williams III, David R Taft, and Jason T McConville
173 Clean-in-Place for Biopharmaceutical Processes, edited by Dale A Seiberling
174 Filtration and Purification in the Biopharmaceutical Industry, Second Edition,edited by Maik W Jornitz and Theodore H Meltzer
175 Protein Formulation and Delivery, Second Edition, edited by Eugene J McNallyand Jayne E Hastedt
176 Aqueous Polymeric Coatings for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Third Edition,edited by James McGinity and Linda A Felton
177 Dermal Absorption and Toxicity Assessment, Second Edition, edited by
Michael S Roberts and Kenneth A Walters
178 Preformulation Solid Dosage Form Development, edited by Moji C Adeyeye andHarry G Brittain
179 Drug-Drug Interactions, Second Edition, edited by A David Rodrigues
180 Generic Drug Product Development: Bioequivalence Issues, edited by
Isadore Kanfer and Leon Shargel
Trang 12An-eX Analytical Services Ltd
Cardiff, United Kingdom
Dermal Absorption and Toxicity Assessment
Second Edition
Trang 1352 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York, NY 10017
q 2008 by Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
Informa Healthcare is an Informa business
No claim to original U.S Government works
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-8493-7591-6 (Hardcover)
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-8493-7591-0 (Hardcover)
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated A wide variety of references are listed Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequence of their use.
No part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access pyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc (CCC)
www.co-222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400 CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dermal absorption and toxicity assessment/edited by Michael S Roberts, Kenneth A Walters – 2nd ed.
p ; cm – (Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences ; v 177)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN-13: 978-0-8493-7591-0 (hb : alk paper)
ISBN-10: 0-8493-7591-6 (hb : alk paper)
1 Dermatotoxicology 2 Dermatologic agents–Toxicology 3 cology 4 Skin absorption 5 Health risk assessment I Roberts, Michael S., 1949– II Walters, Kenneth A., 1949– III Series.
Cosmetics–Toxi-[DNLM: 1 Skin Absorption–physiology 2 Cosmetics–adverse effects.
3 Cosmetics–pharmacokinetics 4 Environmental Exposure 5 Pharmaceutical Preparations–adverse effects 6 Risk Assessment W1 DR893B v.117 2007/WR 102 D434 2007]
Trang 14Since this book was first published in 1998, there have been significant advances inour understanding of the morphology of the skin and the properties that govern thetransport of molecules into and across the three major strata The multitude of datathat has been generated has allowed the development of predictive models for boththe rate and extent of dermal absorption and has increased our ability to predict thelikelihood of local toxic events subsequent to solute penetration and permeation Inthis second edition we have completely revised and updated many of the chaptersthat appeared in the earlier version and we have expanded the scope of the volume
to include coverage of the more recent exciting and innovative areas of research.Those chapters concerned with dermatological and cosmeceutical therapy havebeen moved to a companion publication, Dermatologic, Cosmeceutic, and CosmeticDevelopment: Therapeutic and Novel Approaches
This second edition has been divided into six parts covering skin structureand absorption, measurement of absorption, modeling of dermal absorption andrisk assessment, skin toxicity and its prevention, regulatory issues, and specificexamples of the absorption of environmental materials As in the first edition, thisbook provides an overview of the dermal absorption process, with particularemphasis on the determinants for toxicity arising from dermal exposure
A general introduction, covering the structure of human and animal skin and itsrelationship to dermal absorption, is followed by Part I, which expands on thespecific barrier properties of the skin, such as its physical structure, biosensorproperties, cutaneous metabolism, skin lipid morphology, and dermal blood andlymphatic flow The range of methods used to assess skin absorption is fullydiscussed in Part II There, the use of standard established laboratory methods,such as diffusion cell technology, are covered together with some of the newertechniques, such as the use of cultured skin equivalents Many of the techniquesused for measurement and modeling of dermal absorption and risk assessment arediscussed in Part III This section also includes the use of mathematical models,many of which have been refined to provide more realistic predictions, togetherwith structure-penetration relationships as principles for estimating dermal riskassessment In addition, this part covers the estimation of systemic exposuresubsequent to dermal absorption, pharmacodynamics and the pharmacokinetics ofskin delivery, and the use of various real life exposure scenarios in dermal riskassessment
The next two parts of the book focus on local toxicity and its prevention andregulatory initiatives Within the local toxicity section, issues such as skin damage,irritation, sensitisation, phototoxicity, and the prevention of toxicity are covered.The regulatory section provides information on the various governmental andindustrial programs concerning the issues surrounding skin permeation andtoxicity, including alternative in silico, in vitro, and in vivo strategies to conductstudies for regulatory approval
The final section provides some examples of substances absorbed through theskin, giving particular emphasis to environmental contaminants and cosmetic
iii
Trang 15ingredients This section includes the U.S Environmental Protection Agency’sdefined common environmental substances, together with discussions on thepercutaneous absorption of compounds from soil and bathing water, and thepermeation of pesticides, metals, fragrances, and other cosmetic ingredients.This book is intended for scientists involved in dermal absorption and forthose concerned with the marketing of products that may be absorbed through theskin intentionally or unintentionally To this end, we have been fortunate inobtaining the agreement of many internationally recognized experts in the field
of dermal absorption and toxicity assessment to provide coverage of their specificfields of expertise To all of our authors we extend our sincere thanks for theirunreserved efforts and time
Michael S RobertsKenneth A Walters
Trang 16The development and use of chemicals, especially those in the pharmaceutical,general chemical, and cosmetic fields, are associated with hazards arising fromhuman exposure For these compounds, absorption into the skin may represent amajor route of entry into the body In addition, a number of such substances areapplied to the skin for therapeutic or cosmetic purposes The rate and extent ofpenetration into and absorption through the skin are defined by a number ofvariables, including environmental conditions, skin physiology, permeantstructure, method of application, and species differences.
This volume provides and overview of the dermal absorption process, withparticular emphasis on the determinants for toxicity arising from dermal exposure.Part I is concerned with the structure of the skin and the underlying principlesdefining percutaneous absorption and toxicity In Part II, the concept of dermal riskassessment, predicted from epidemiological factors, physiological models, invitro/in vivo experimentation, and chemical structures, is examined by experts inthese areas This section also describes the use of mathematical models togetherwith structure-penetration relationships as principles for estimating dermal riskassessment
Parts III and IV are concerned with dermal absorption and risk assessment asapplied to specific product types: pharmaceuticals and cosmetics The individualchapters discuss specific product classes such as drugs used for pain andinflammation, fragrances, sunscreens, and hair dyes The final section, Part V,provides information on skin permeation following environmental exposure andincludes discussions on the percutaneous absorption of compounds from soil andbathing water Throughout this volume, pharmacokinetic data and models oftenused in dermal risk assessment are fully described
The book has been written for scientists interested in dermal absorption andthose concerned with the marketing of products that may be absorbed through theskin either intentionally or unintentionally We hope that this book will prove useful
to those involved in research and development in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic,agrochemical, household, and general chemical industries
Michael S RobertsKenneth A Walters
v
Trang 18Preface to the Second Edition iii
Preface from the First Edition v
Contributors xi
INTRODUCTION
1 Human Skin Morphology and Dermal Absorption 1
Michael S Roberts and Kenneth A Walters
2 Animal Skin Morphology and Dermal Absorption 17
Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere, Ronald E Baynes, and Jim E Riviere
PART I: SKIN BARRIER PROPERTIES AND ABSORPTION
3 The Physical Structure of the Skin Barrier 37
Lars Norle´n
4 Morphology of Epidermal Lipids 69
Jennifer R Hill and Philip W Wertz
5 Stratum Corneum as a Biosensor 79
Peter M Elias, Kenneth R Feingold, and Mitsuhiro Denda
6 Cutaneous Metabolism 89
Simon C Wilkinson and Faith M Williams
7 Formulation Issues 117
U F Schaefer, B C Lippold, and C S Leopold
PART II: MEASUREMENT OF SKIN ABSORPTION
8 Interpretation of In Vitro Skin Absorption Studies
Trang 1910 Skin Absorption as Studied by Spectroscopic Methods 161
Ulrike Gu¨nther, Siegfried Wartewig, Hendrik Metz, and
Reinhard H H Neubert
PART III: MODELING OF DERMAL ABSORPTION
AND RISK ASSESSMENT
11 Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Yuri Dancik, Owen G Jepps, and Michael S Roberts
12 Beyond Stratum Corneum 209
Yuri Dancik, Owen G Jepps, and Michael S Roberts
13 Biophysical Models for Skin Transport and Absorption 251
Johannes M Nitsche and Gerald B Kasting
14 Mathematical Models for Different Exposure Conditions 271
Yuri G Anissimov
15 Modeling Skin Permeability in Risk Assessment 287
Dara Fitzpatrick, Darach Golden, and John Corish
16 In Vitro–In Vivo Correlations in Transdermal Drug Delivery 299
Jonathan Hadgraft and Majella E Lane
17 Estimation of Subsequent Systemic Exposure—Physiological Models 309James N McDougal
18 RISKOFDERM: Predictions Based on In Vivo Factors 323
Wim J A Meuling, Johannes J M van de Sandt, and Joop J van Hemmen
PART IV: SKIN TOXICITY AND PREVENTION
19 Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships for Skin Corrosivity
and Sensitization 339
Mark T D Cronin, Steven J Enoch, and Judith C Madden
20 Allergic Contact Dermatitis 359
Haw-Yueh Thong and Howard I Maibach
21 Irritancy of Topical Chemicals in Transdermal Drug
Delivery Systems 371
Heidi P Chan, Cheryl Y Levin, and Howard I Maibach
22 Photosensitivity Induced by Exogenous Agents:
Phototoxicity and Photoallergy 391
Haw-Yueh Thong and Howard I Maibach
Trang 2023 Systemic Toxicity Caused by Absorption of Drugs and Chemicals
Through Skin 405
Haw-Yueh Thong, Susi Freeman, and Howard I Maibach
24 Solvent and Vehicle Effects on the Skin 433
Michael S Roberts, Audrey Gierden, Jim E Riviere, and Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere
PART V: REGULATORY ISSUES
25 United States Environmental Protection Agency Perspectives on
Skin Absorption and Exposure 449
Michael Dellarco
26 Dermal Absorption of Chemicals: Some Australian
Regulatory Considerations 459
Utz Mueller, Andrew Bartholomaeus, and Mark Jenner
27 International Perspectives in Dermal Absorption 471
Janet Kielhorn and Stephanie Melching-Kollmuß
28 Structure–Activity Relationships and Prediction of Photoallergic
and Phototoxic Potential 483
Martin D Barratt
29 Potential Regulatory Use of (Q)SARs to Develop Dermal Irritation
and Corrosion Assessment Strategies 495
Ingrid Gerner, Etje Hulzebos, Emiel Rorije, Betty Hakkert, John D Walker,
Matthias Herzler, and Horst Spielmann
30 Development of (Q)SARs for Dermal Irritation and Corrosion
Assessment Using European Union New Chemicals Notification Data 507Ingrid Gerner, Etje Hulzebos, Emiel Rorije, Matthias Herzler, Manfred Liebsch,
John D Walker, and Horst Spielmann
31 Regulatory Assessment of Skin Sensitization 523
Winfried Steiling and Hans-Werner Vohr
32 Assessment of Topical Bioequivalence Using Microdialysis
and Other Techniques 537
Eva Benfeldt, Edward D Bashaw, and Vinod P Shah
33 An Industry Perspective of Topical Dermal Bioequivalence 549
Dawn McCleverty, Richard Lyons, and Brian Henry
PART VI: SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF ABSORPTION
34 Dermal Absorption of Chemical Contaminants from Soil 563
John C Kissel, Elizabeth W Spalt, Jeffry H Shirai, and Annette L Bunge
Trang 2135 Percutaneous Absorption of Pesticides 575
Jon R Heylings and David J Esdaile
36 Bathing Water: Percutaneous Absorption of Water Contaminants 593Richard P Moody
37 Percutaneous Absorption of Prodrugs and Soft Drugs 605
Kenneth B Sloan and Scott C Wasdo
38 Skin Penetration of Cosmetic Ingredients and Contaminants 623
Keith R Brain and Kenneth A Walters
39 Percutaneous Absorption of Hair Dyes 635
William E Dressler
40 Dermal Absorption of Fragrance Materials 651
Keith R Brain and Jon Lalko
Index 665
Trang 22Yuri G Anissimov School of Biomolecular and Physical Sciences, GriffithUniversity, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
Martin D Barratt Marlin Consultancy, Carlton, Bedford, U.K
Andrew Bartholomaeus Drug Safety and Evaluation Branch, TherapeuticGoods Administration, Woden, Australia
Edward D Bashaw Division III, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, U.S Food andDrug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, U.S.A
Ronald E Baynes Center for Chemical Toxicology Research and
Pharmacokinetics, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State
University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A
Eva Benfeldt Department of Dermatology, Gentofte Hospital, University
of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
Keith R Brain An-eX Analytical Services, Ltd., and Cardiff University,
Cardiff, U.K
Robert L Bronaugh Office of Cosmetics and Colors, Food and Drug
Administration, College Park, Maryland, U.S.A
Annette L Bunge Department of Chemical Engineering, Colorado School
of Mines, Golden, Colorado, U.S.A
Heidi P Chan Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine,
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
John Corish School of Chemistry, Trinity College, University of Dublin,
Dublin, Ireland
Mark T D Cronin School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Liverpool John
Moores University, Liverpool, U.K
Yuri Dancik Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital,
University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Michael Dellarco U.S Environmental Protection Agency, National Center forEnvironmental Assessment, Washington, D.C., U.S.A
Mitsuhiro Denda Shiseido Research Center, Yokohama, Japan
William E Dressler Independent Consultant, Huntington, Connecticut, U.S.A
xi
Trang 23Peter M Elias Dermatology and Medical (Metabolism) Services,
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Departments of Dermatology and Medicine,University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
Steven J Enoch School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Liverpool John MooresUniversity, Liverpool, U.K
David J Esdaile LAB International Research Centre, Szabadsa´gpuszta,
Veszpre´m, Hungary
Kenneth R Feingold Dermatology and Medical (Metabolism) Services,
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Departments of Dermatology and Medicine,University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
Dara Fitzpatrick Department of Chemistry, University College Cork,
Cork, Ireland
Susi Freeman Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine,
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
Ulrike Gu¨nther Institute of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics,
Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
Ingrid Gerner Weidenauer Weg, Berlin, Germany
Audrey Gierden Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital,
University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Darach Golden Centre for High Performance Computing, Trinity College,University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Jonathan Hadgraft The School of Pharmacy, University of London,
Safety of Substances and Preparations, Thielallee, Berlin, Germany
Jon R Heylings Research and Investigative Toxicology, Syngenta CentralToxicology Laboratory, Macclesfield, Cheshire, U.K
Jennifer R Hill Dows Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.Etje Hulzebos National Institute for Public Health and the Environment,Expertise Centre for Substances, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Mark Jenner Scitox Assessment Services, Kambah, Australia
Trang 24Owen G Jepps Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital,
University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Gerald B Kasting, James L Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of
Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A
Janet Kielhorn Fraunhofer Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine,Hannover, Germany
John C Kissel Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences,University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
Jon Lalko Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Woodcliff Lake,
New Jersey, U.S.A
Majella E Lane The School of Pharmacy, University of London, London, U.K
C S Leopold Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Institute of Pharmacy,University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Cheryl Y Levin Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine,
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
Manfred Liebsch Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Centre for
Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments—ZEBET, Diedersdorfer Weg,Berlin, Germany
B C Lippold Institute of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, HeinrichHeine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
Richard Lyons Pfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich, Kent, U.K.Judith C Madden School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Liverpool John
Moores University, Liverpool, U.K
Howard I Maibach Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine,
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
Dawn McCleverty Pfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich,
Kent, U.K
James N McDougal Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology,
Boonschoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, U.S.A.Stephanie Melching-Kollmuß Fraunhofer Institute of Toxicology and
Experimental Medicine, Hannover, Germany
Hendrik Metz Institute of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Martin LutherUniversity of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
Wim J A Meuling Business Unit Biosciences, TNO Quality of Life, Zeist,The Netherlands
Trang 25Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere Center for Chemical Toxicology Research andPharmacokinetics, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University,Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Richard P Moody Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch,
Environmental Health Centre, Ottawa, Canada
Utz Mueller Food Standards Australia New Zealand, Canberra BC, AustraliaReinhard H H Neubert Institute of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics,Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
Johannes M Nitsche Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering,University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, U.S.A.Lars Norle´n Medical Nobel Institute, Department of Cellular and MolecularBiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Jim E Riviere Center for Chemical Toxicology Research and Pharmacokinetics,College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
North Carolina, U.S.A
Michael S Roberts Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital,University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Emiel Rorije National Institute for Public Health and the Environment,
Expertise Centre for Substances, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Monika Scha¨fer-Korting Institut fu¨r Pharmazie (Pharmakologie und
Toxikologie) der Freien Universita¨t Berlin, Berlin, Germany
U F Schaefer Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology,
Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany
Sylvia Schreiber Institut fu¨r Pharmazie (Pharmakologie und Toxikologie)der Freien Universita¨t Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Vinod P Shah Pharmaceutical Consultant, North Potomac, Maryland, U.S.A.Jeffry H Shirai Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences,University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
Kenneth B Sloan Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida,Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A
Elizabeth W Spalt Integral Consulting, Inc., Mercer Island, Washington, U.S.A.Horst Spielmann Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Centre for
Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments—ZEBET, Diedersdorfer Weg,Berlin, Germany
Trang 26Winfried Steiling Henkel KGaA, Corporate SHE and Product Safety—HumanSafety Assessment, Du¨sseldorf, Germany
Haw-Yueh Thong Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine,
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
Johannes J M van de Sandt Business Unit Food and Chemical Risk Analysis,TNO Quality of Life, Zeist, The Netherlands
Joop J van Hemmen Business Unit Food and Chemical Risk Analysis, TNOQuality of Life, Zeist, The Netherlands
Hans-Werner Vohr Department of Toxicology, Bayer HealthCare AG,
Wuppertal, Germany
John D Walker TSCA Interagency Testing Committee, Office of PollutionPrevention and Toxics, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,D.C., U.S.A
Kenneth A Walters An-eX Analytical Services, Ltd., Cardiff, U.K
Siegfried Wartewig Institute for Applied Dermatopharmacy, Halle, GermanyScott C Wasdo Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida,Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A
Philip W Wertz Dows Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.Simon C Wilkinson Medical Toxicology Research Centre, Newcastle University,Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
Faith M Williams Medical Toxicology Research Centre and Institute for
Research on Environment and Sustainability, Newcastle University,
Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K
Trang 281 Human Skin Morphology and
of the intercellular lipids and the process of desquamation (Fig 2)
INITIATION OF KERATINOCYTE MIGRATION AND DIFFERENTIATION
The cells of the epidermis originate in the basal lamina between the dermis andviable epidermis In this layer there are melanocytes, Langerhans cells, Merkel cells,and keratinocytes The keratinocytes of the basal lamina are attached to thebasement membrane by hemidesmosomes and focal adhesions that are comprised
of several distinct proteins The hemidesmosome complex contains two bullouspemphigoid antigens (BPAg1 and BPAg2) and several integrins (including integrins
1
Trang 29Targeted delivery Release
Follicles, sweat ducts
Metabolites Urine,etc.
Clearance Distribution
Tissues
Action
Systematic blood concentration Dermal blood flow
Epidermis and upper dermis concentration
Epidermal and demal metabolism
Stratum corneum penetration
Toxicity
Therapeutic activity
Product/device solute vehicle
FIGURE 1 Dermal absorption; sites of action and toxicity Abbreviation: SC, stratum corneum.
FIGURE 2 Major events in epidermal differentiation.
Trang 30a6b4 and a3b1), together with multiple laminins (13–16), all of which are involved
in securing the cell to the basement membrane BPAg2 is a collagen that has anamino terminus within the hemidesmosome and a carboxy terminus within thelamina lucida of the basement membrane and may form part of the anchoringfilament The fundamental importance of these basal membrane-anchoring proteins
is reflected in the devastating skin disorders associated with inherited and acquiredencoding gene mutations such as dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (type VIIcollagen) and bullous pemphigoid (integrin a6b4) (14)
In addition to hemidesmosome binding, another site for adhesion of the cells ofthe epidermal basal layer and the basal membrane is the adherens junction (17).The adherens junction expresses a different protein profile to desmosomes andhemidesmosomes, containing talin, vinculin, and cadherins; whereas, the hemi-desmosomes are linked to cytoplasmic keratin, the proteins of the adherens junctionsare linked to cytoplasmic actin microfilaments and appear to play an important role
in cell migration (18) and may also have a functional role in nuclear signaling (19).Although a secure link between the basal keratinocytes and the basal matrix isessential for skin integrity, these cells must also be capable of detaching andmigrating to begin the process of terminal differentiation that will form thestratum corneum Among the proteins implicated in detachment is CD151, atransmembrane protein of the tetraspanin family (20) CD151 is localized withintegrin a6b4 at cell–matrix interfaces and it is suggested that dissociation of thiscomplex allows remodeling of the cell–matrix attachment and subsequent cellmigration Another important link in the chain is integrin-linked kinase, whichconnects integrins to actin fibers and is thought to be highly involved in cell–matrixand cell–cell adhesion and migration (21) Similarly a role has been suggested forthe calcium/manganese-ATPase, ATP2C1, in cell migration where it may act as aregulator of the integrin-linked basal attachment (22)
The relatively short-lived adherens junctions and the more stable somes regulate cell–matrix adhesion Both types of adhesion must be disrupted toallow the keratinocyte to detach from the basal membrane Rear detachment isaccompanied by membrane ripping and the loss of cellular material in keratino-cytes Rigort and colleagues (23) showed that migrating keratinocytes leave behind
hemidesmo-“migration tracks” of cellular remnants that were anchored to a meshwork ofextracellular matrix proteins consisting of collagen type IV, fibronectin, laminin,and laminin 5 These tracts were classified on the basis of their size, distribution,and molecular composition Type I macroaggregates appeared as spherical andtubular structures with a diameter of about 50 to 100 nm These structures appeared
to be derived from fragmentation of long tubular extensions, the retracting fibers, atthe cell rear and contained high amounts of a3b1 integrin, a component offibronectin and laminin receptors in migrating keratinocytes usually found infocal adhesions Type II macroaggregates were spherical structures with a diameter
of about 30 to 50 nm that were arranged in clusters and scattered over the gapsbetween type I, macroaggregates Type II macroaggregates contained high amounts
of a6b4 integrin and probably derived from former hemidesmosomes Theirobservations support the concept that the release of macroaggregates represents adistinct cellular mechanism of rear detachment based on the loss of adhesivereceptors embedded in membrane-covered cellular remnants
The role of the non-neuronal cholinergic system of human epidermis has beenreviewed recently (24) The system is known as the keratinocyte acetylcholine axisand is composed of the enzymes mediating acetylcholine synthesis and degradation,
Trang 31and two classes of acetylcholine receptors, the nicotinic and muscarinic receptors.Regulation of keratinocyte cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion is one of the importantbiological functions of cutaneous acetylcholine The targets include both theintercellular adhesion molecules, such as desmosomal cadherins, and the cell–matrix adhesion molecules (integrins) The signaling pathways include activation
or inhibition of kinase cascades resulting in either up- or down-regulation of theexpression of cell adhesion molecules or changes in their phosphorylation status, orboth For example, it has been proposed that the muscarinic M3 receptor activation islinked to up-regulation of a2b1-integrin and a3b1-integrin-mediated cell adhesion,whereas activation of the muscarinic M4 receptor stimulates keratinocyte motility byup-regulating the migratory integrins a5b1, avb5, and avb6 (25)
Nguyen and colleagues investigated the role of the non-neuronal acetylcholineaxis in the control of cell–cell adhesion of human epidermal keratinocytes (26).Cholinergic effects on the expression of desmoglein 1 and 3 were measured usingsemiquantitative immunofluorescence and Western blot assays Keratinocyte mono-layers were treated with the cholinergic agonist carbachol or the acetylcholinesteraseinhibitor pyridostigmine bromide Both compounds increased the relative amounts
of desmoglein 1 and 3 The role for cholinergic receptor-mediated phosphorylation ofdesmoglein molecules in the assembly and disassembly of keratinocyte desmosomeswas investigated by evaluating the effects of a cholinergic antagonist, atropine, onkeratinocyte adhesion and desmoglein phosphorylation status Atropine induced arapid detachment of cells from each other and increased phosphorylation ofdesmoglein 3 The atropine-dependent phosphorylation of desmoglein 3 wasinhibited by carbachol It was concluded that keratinocyte cholinergic receptorsregulate desmosomal adhesion of keratinocytes by altering the level of expression ofboth desmoglein 1 and 3 and the phosphorylation state of desmoglein 3
The same group also investigated the roles of the muscarinic M3, the nicotinica3 and the mixed muscarinic–nicotinic a9 acetylcholine receptors in the physiologiccontrol of keratinocyte adhesion (27) Both muscarinic and nicotinic antagonistscaused keratinocyte detachment and reversibly increased the permeability ofkeratinocyte monolayers Phosphorylation of adhesion proteins is known to play
an important role in the assembly and disassembly of intercellular junctions Theauthors found that the phosphorylation levels of E-cadherin, b-catenin, andg-catenin increased following pharmacological blockage of muscarinic receptors.Long-term blocking of all three receptor-signaling pathways with antisenseoligonucleotides resulted in cell–cell detachment and changes in the expressionlevels of E-cadherin, b-catenin, and g-catenin in cultured human keratinocytes.Overall, the data indicated that the three acetylcholine receptors played keysynergistic roles in regulating keratinocyte adhesion, most likely by modulatingthe levels and activities of cadherin and catenin
The keratinocyte cholinergic axis may prove to be a very interestingbiochemical pathway to probe in the search for new therapeutic entities for thetreatment of skin adhesion malfunction, such as Hailey–Hailey and Darier’sdiseases
THE INTERCELLULAR LIPIDS OF THE STRATUM CORNEUM
The development of the stratum corneum from the keratinocytes of the basal layerinvolves several steps of cell differentiation that have resulted in a structure basedclassification of the layers above the basal layer (the stratum basale) Thus the cells
Trang 32progress through the stratum spinosum, the stratum granulosum, the stratumlucidium to the stratum corneum Cell turnover, from stratum basale to stratumcorneum, is about 21 days The stratum spinosum (prickle cell layer), which liesimmediately above the basal layer, consists of several layers of cells that areconnected by desmosomes and contain prominent keratin tonofilaments In theouter cell layers of the stratum spinosum, membrane-coating granules appear andthis region forms the border with the overlying stratum granulosum The mostcharacteristic feature of the stratum granulosum are the many intracellularmembrane-coating granules, the assembly of which appears to take place in theendoplasmic reticulum and Golgi regions (28) Lamellar subunits are observedwithin these granules and these are the precursors of the intercellular lipid lamellae
of the stratum corneum In the outermost layers of the stratum granulosum, thelamellar granules migrate to the apical cell surface where they fuse and eventuallyextrude their contents into the intercellular space At this stage, in the differentiationprocess, the keratinocytes lose their nuclei and other cytoplasmic organelles, becomeflattened and compacted to form the stratum lucidum, which eventually forms thestratum corneum The extrusion of the contents of lamellar granules is a fundamentalrequirement for the formation of the epidermal permeability barrier (29) anddisturbances in this process have been implicated in various dermatologicaldisorders (30–32)
There has been some debate on the physical structure and state of theintercellular lipid regions A structural model of the skin barrier was proposed
by Norlen (33), who postulated that the stratum corneum intercellular lipid existed
as a single and coherent lamellar gel phase The proposed intercellular structurewas stabilized by the unique mixture of lipids and their chain length distributionsand had virtually no phase boundaries The intact gel phase was suggested to belocated mainly in the lower half of stratum corneum In the outermost regions of thestratum corneum, crystalline segregation and phase separation may be the result ofthe desquamation process This single gel phase model differed significantly fromearlier models in that it predicted that no phase separation was present in theunperturbed barrier structure Norlen and colleagues went on to show, usingatomic force microscopy on Langmuir–Blodgett films composed of extractedhuman stratum corneum ceramides, cholesterol, free fatty acids, cholesterolsulfate, and cholesteryl oleate, that the saturated long-chain free fatty aciddistribution of human stratum corneum prevented hydrocarbon chain segregation(34) More recently, this group used differential scanning calorimetry, fluorescencespectroscopy, and two-photon excitation and laser scanning confocal fluorescencemicroscopy to show that, at normal skin temperatures, the phase state of hydratedbilayers made from human stratum corneum lipids corresponded microscopically
to a single gel-phase at pH 7 There was coexistence of different gel-phases between
pH 5 and 6, and no fluid phase at any pH [(35), see also Chapter 3 of this volume]
It is not surprising that the biologically unique stratum corneum lipidcomposition, mainly long chain ceramides, free fatty acids and cholesterol [(36),see also Chapter 4 of this volume], results in lipid phase behavior that is differentfrom that of other biological membranes The extensive work of Bouwstra and hercolleagues suggests that crystalline phases are predominantly present in thestratum corneum intercellular lipid, but also that there is probably a subpopulation
of lipids that form a liquid phase, probably promoted by the presence of free fattyacids (37) The authors pointed out that mixtures prepared only with ceramides andcholesterol formed a lamellar phase with a 13 nm periodicity When free fatty acids
Trang 33were present the lattice density of the structure increased The presence of ceramide
1 is essential to the formation of the 13 nm lamellar phase Bouwstra’s groupproposed a molecular model for the structural organization of the 13 nm lamellarphase (the sandwich model), in which crystalline and liquid domains coexisted (38).The discussion on the precise nature of the stratum corneum intercellularlipid state seems set to continue (34,39,40), but, whatever the actual state is, thepossibility of using the collective knowledge of the structure of the skin barrier toformulate vesicles for improved drug delivery across the skin has been the subject
of intense investigation For example, the Leiden group focused on differencesbetween the effects of gel-state vesicles, liquid-state vesicles, and elastic vesicles(41–43) The in vivo and in vitro interactions between elastic-, rigid vesicles andmicelles with human skin were investigated (42) Following application of thesolutions containing the vesicles and micelles, the stratum corneum was tape-stripped and subsequently visualized by freeze fracture electron microscopy Therewere no ultrastructural changes in skin treated with rigid vesicles Elastic vesiclesappeared to rapidly partition intact into the deeper layers of the stratum corneum,where they accumulated in channel-like regions Since only small amounts ofvesicle material was found in the deepest layers of the stratum corneum, it wasconcluded that partitioning of intact vesicles into the viable epidermis was unlikely.There was excellent in vitro/in vivo correlation It was concluded that elasticvesicles were superior to rigid vesicles for interaction with skin and drug delivery.Distribution profiles in the stratum corneum were obtained for the elastic andrigid vesicle material and for the model drug ketorolac (43) As suggested
by earlier work (42), the elastic vesicle rapidly entered the deeper layers of thestratum corneum The rigid vesicle material did not penetrate deeply intothe stratum corneum As expected, the elastic vesicles delivered more ketorolacinto the stratum corneum than the rigid vesicles Distribution of ketorolac in thedeeper layers of the stratum corneum was different than that of the vesicle material,suggesting that the ketorolac was released from the vesicles in the skin
Similarly, deformable or elastic liposomal formulations have proved to besuperior to rigid and traditional liposomes in the delivery of many compounds intoand across the skin, including estradiol (44), diclofenac (45), and propranolol (46).The use of vesicles such as liposomes to modulate drug delivery into and throughthe skin has become reasonably accepted but the mechanism(s) of action remainsunclear As recently pointed out by El Maghraby and colleagues (47), vesicles varyconsiderably with respect to size, lamellarity, charge, membrane fluidity orelasticity, which allows for multiple functions ranging from local to transdermaleffects and this may result in multiple modes of action
DESQUAMATION
During the process of terminal differentiation, keratinocytes migrate from the basallayer toward the stratum corneum where they ultimately detach in the process ofdesquamation Since the keratinocytes are linked by desmosomes, it is perhaps notsurprising that it is the degradation of these links that signals the initiation ofdesquamation The major adhesive molecules in the desmosome are cadherins.These are CaCC-dependent molecules and they cooperate to make up the adhesivecore of the desmosome The adhesion molecules may have differentiation-specificfunctions over and above their roles in cell adhesion (for review see Ref 48)
Trang 34The most important cadherins located in the desmosome are desmoglein 1,desmocollin 1, and corneodesmosin, and it is thought that, while desmoglein 1promotes the formation of the adhesive link, it is the relative level of desmogleinand desmocollin expressed at the cell surface that regulates the adhesive process(49) For desquamation to occur, it is necessary for the desmosomal link to degrade.Human tissue kallikreins are a family of 15 trypsin- or chymotrypsin-like secretedserine proteases (KLK1–KLK15) that have been identified in normal stratumcorneum, and are candidate desquamation-related proteases Two serine proteases
of the kallikrein family have been implicated in this process: the stratum corneumchymotryptic enzyme (SCCE/KLK7/Hk7) and the stratum corneum trypticenzyme (SCTE/KLK5/Hk5) The capacity of these enzymes to cleave desmoglein
1, desmocollin 1, and corneodesmosin has been investigated (50) At acidic pHssimilar to that of the stratum corneum, SCCE cleaved corneodesmosin anddesmocollin 1 but was unable to degrade desmoglein 1 On the other hand,incubation with SCTE induced degradation of all three proteins The data suggestedthat SCTE was able to activate the proform of SCCE and that both kallikreins wereinvolved in desquamation More recently, it was found that the epidermal pHgradient regulates the activity of KLK5 with acidic conditions being required for itsactivation in the superficial layers of the stratum corneum (51)
There are several more serine proteases (apart from KLK5 and KLK7) that arelocated in the epidermis Borgono and colleagues (52) investigated the contribution
of KLK1, KLK5, KLK6, KLK13, and KLK14 to the desquamation process byexamining their interaction with a colocalized serine protease inhibitor lympho-epithelial Kazal-type-related inhibitor (LEKTI) and their ability to digest desmo-glein 1 Apart from KLK13, all kallikreins digested the ectodomain of desmoglein 1within cadherin repeats, CaCC-binding sites, or in the juxtamembrane regionsuggesting that multiple kallikreins participate in desquamation
As is quite common in biological systems, evolution has resulted in anextremely complex mechanism for shedding a layer of skin each day It is asimple matter to accept that this happens for a reason but not so simple to figureout just what that reason (or reasons) is Why does the stratum corneum keeprenewing itself? Milstone (12) puts forward the concept that continuous desquama-tion might reflect “a first line of defense against a myriad of known as well asunanticipated or novel physical, chemical or toxic assailants.” The argument isintriguing, the discussion is continuing
INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SKIN PHYSIOLOGY
AND KINETICS OF DERMAL ABSORPTION
As some of the key concepts concerning these inter-relationships are covered in thelater chapters “Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics ofskin” and “Beyond stratum corneum,” this section is limited to a summary of thekey principles and implications
Principles of Dermal Absorption
The amount of a compound absorbed (Q) into the body depends on effective fluxthrough the epidermis Js, the area of application (A), the effective lag time (lag), andthe exposure time (T):
Trang 35Q Z JsAðTKlagÞ (1)The time required to reach a steady-state flux JsA is w2 times the lag time.Figure 3 shows an illustration of equation (1) for release of nicotine from a patch invivo and in vitro It is apparent that in vivo there is an additional pharmacokineticlag and the JsA is only slightly less consistent, with release from the patch being therate-determining step in the absorption process The effective flux into a target site
in the epidermis or dermis in turn is dependent on the first pass availability of thesolute through the skin Fs, recognizing that this may be less than one through lossfrom removal on clothing, evaporation, adsorption to outermost layers in thestratum corneum, vaporization, desquamation or by skin first pass metabolismprior to reaching the site In general, the in vivo flux:
Wester et al (53) estimated Fsto be 0.57 for nitroglycerin in the monkey usingthe AUC ratio for unchanged nitroglycerin after transdermal and intravenousadministration A higher Fsof 0.77 was obtained when the AUC of total radio-activity was used implying about 20% of the nitroglycerin had been metabolizedduring the topical absorption process
Solute flux through the stratum corneum may occur by a number of pathwaysand be retarded by various barriers and removal by the cutaneous blood supply, asdiscussed later Of practical interest, is the maximum flux Jmaxas this should applyacross all vehicles and may be used to estimate Jsfor a given vehicle if the fractionalsolubility in that vehicle is known The precise determinant of Jmax is unclear, asshown in Figure 4, although solute size can be shown to be a dominant determinant(54,55) It is evident that the Jmax, for steroids at approximately the same molecularweight, is similar except for the most polar one for both infinite (55) and finite (56)dosing (Fig 4) The maximum flux concept does, however, have limitations in that
FIGURE 3 Nicotine release from patches in vitro (&) and in vivo (B) Source: Adapted from Ref 63.
Trang 36solutes in high concentrations may exhibit nonlinear concentration dependenciesdue to effects on the stratum corneum or association in the vehicle An idealmaximum flux may be estimated as a product of aqueous solubility and per-meability coefficient kp, where kpmay be defined in terms of octanol–water partitioncoefficients log Koctand molecular weight (MW) by an expression similar to thatdeveloped by Potts and Guy (57):
Epidermal Reservoir and Dermal Clearance
Lipophilic solutes may also accumulate in the skin to form a so-called skin reservoir(58) Rehydration of the skin may cause such solutes to be released An example ofthe historical evidence of this effect is illustrated by the work of Vickers (59) in
(C)
FIGURE 4 (A C) Determinants of maximum flux for a large set of solutes, (D) steroids from an infinite dosing situation, and (E) steroids from finite dosing for occluded (open symbols) and non- occluded (closed symbols) conditions Abbreviations: Mpt, melting point; MW, molecular weight Source: From Refs 54 56.
Trang 37which vasoconstriction was achieved by occluding an area of skin with plastic film
12 to 14 days after an initial application of steroid under occlusion and a fading ofthe vasoconstriction on removal of the film at 16 hours The clearance of a solutefrom the epidermis is also an important determinant of dermal absorption andtoxicity and, if impaired e.g., by vasoconstriction, may lead to higher levels of thesolute in the stratum corneum and in the viable epidermis Altered topicalabsorption due to changing blood flow can also occur as a consequence of elevatedtemperature or exercise or coadministration of vasodilating drugs
Systemic Concentrations of Solutes
Figure 5 shows serum plasma concentrations of testosterone obtained on theapplication of a patch and on its removal It is noted that there is a lag prior toreaching maximal levels and on in returning to baseline on patch removal Further,after reaching a maximum, the serum levels slowly decline with time, consistentwith a reduction in flux due to a gradual depletion in the amount of testosterone inthe patch Topical products, especially transdermal patches, often seek to provideconstant therapeutically effective plasma concentrations Css The release flux Jsideally needed to reach such concentrations is given by
Trang 39systems based on the substitution of desired plasma concentrations and bodyclearances into equation (4).
Physiological and Pathological Determinants of Barrier Function
Age, gender, race, environment, species, and application site can affect neous absorption (60) The interrelationship between skin pathology and dermalabsorption and toxicity assessment is variable and, usually, related to the severity ofthe pathology Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) is one measure of skin barrierfunction that is either unaffected or compromised by the disease process In general,percutaneous absorption appears to show an association with TEWL (61)
percuta-Various strategies to impair and enhance skin permeability are detailedelsewhere in the companion to this book (62) Technologies considered include:chemical enhancement, iontophoresis, ultrasound, microneedles, and pressurewaves Prodrugs are considered later in this volume
There are also a range of strategies that can be used to assess topicalbioavailability and bioequivalence as summarized in Scheme 1
TOXICITY ASSESSMENT
In general, toxicity after topical exposure may be classified as (i) accidental arisingfrom environmental, occupational or recreational exposure or (ii) cosmetic ortherapeutic related In this second edition, a greater emphasis has been placed ontoxicity issues, with a section devoted specifically to regulatory issues
Blood and/or urine levels
Target tissue levels (e.g., biopsy, microdialysis)
Stratum corneum tape stripping
Remainder in topically applied product
Direct: Clinical trial
Indirect: Related response (e.g., vasoconstriction, TEWL)
Cadaver skin percutaneous absorption
Membrane rate of release
Drug concentrations across human skin in vivo
Pharmacodynamic response in vivo
In vivo animal studies
In vitro pharmacokinetic studies
SCHEME 1 Strategies used to define percutaneous absorption Abbreviation: TEWL, dermal water loss.
Trang 40Dermal absorption and toxicity may be defined by the interrelationship of theanatomy and physiology of the skin with the physicochemical properties of thesolutes and the conditions under which they are used A number of structure–transport/activity relationships and pharmacokinetic models have been developed
to be able to predict both absorption and toxicity under a range of conditions Onechallenge is to be able to quantify solute concentrations and effects in the lowerlayers of the epidermis in vivo in dynamic studies
6 Elias PM Stratum corneum defensive functions: an integrated view J Invest Dermatol 2005; 125:183–200.
7 Di Nardo A, Gallo RL Cutaneous barriers in defense against microbial invasion In: Elias PM, Feingold KR, eds Skin Barrier New York: Taylor & Francis, 2006:363–77.
8 Bouwstra JA, Pilgram GSK, Ponec M Structure of the skin barrier In: Elias PM, Feingold KR, eds Skin Barrier New York: Taylor & Francis, 2006:65–95.
9 Roberts MS, Cross SE, Pellett MA Skin transport In: Walters KA, ed Dermatological and Transdermal Formulations New York: Marcel Dekker, 2002:89–195.
10 Bronaugh RL, Maibach HI Percutaneous Absorption 4th ed New York: Taylor & Francis, 2005.
11 Cross SE, Roberts MS Dermal blood flow, lymphatics, and binding as determinants of topical absorption, clearance, and distribution In: Riviere JE, ed Dermal Absorption Models in Toxicology and Pharmacology New York: Taylor & Francis, 2006:251–81.
12 Milstone LM Epidermal desquamation J Dermatol Sci 2004; 36:131–40.
13 Borradori L, Sonnenberg A Structure and function of hemidesmosomes: more than simple adhesion complexes J Invest Dermatol 1999; 112:411–8.
14 Fassihi H, Wong T, Wessagowit V, et al Target proteins in inherited and acquired blistering skin disorders Clin Exp Dermatol 2006; 31:252–9.
15 McMillan JR, Akiyama M, Nakamura H, et al Colocalization of multiple laminin isoforms predominantly beneath hemidesmosomes in the upper lamina densa of the epidermal basement membrane J Histochem Cytochem 2006; 54:109–18.
16 Aumailley M, El Khal A, Knoss N, et al Laminin 5 processing and its integration into the ECM Matrix Biol 2003; 22:49–54.
17 Kaiser HW, Ness W, Jungblut I, et al Adherens junctions: demonstration in human epidermis J Invest Dermatol 1993; 100:180–5.
18 Haftek M, Hansen MU, Kaiser HW, Kreysel HW, Schmitt D Interkeratinocyte adherens junctions: immunocytochemical visualization of cell–cell junctional structures, distict from desmosomes, in human epidermis J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106:498–504.