Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 48 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
48
Dung lượng
289,84 KB
Nội dung
Economic AssessmentofPuketoi
Wind Farm
Report to Mighty River Power
July 2011
8 Halswell St, Thorndon
P O Box 3479, Wellington
Tel: +64 4 472 1880
Fax: +64 4 472 1211
econ@nzier.org.nz
www.nzier.org.nz
NZIER’s standard terms of engagement for contract research can be found at www.nzier.org.nz.
While NZIER will use all reasonable endeavours in undertaking contract research and producing reports
to ensure the information is as accurate as practicable, the Institute, its contributors, employees, and Board
shall not be liable (whether in contract, tort (including negligence), equity or on any other basis) for any loss
or damage sustained by any person relying on such work whatever the cause of such loss or damage.
About NZIER
NZIER is a specialist consulting firm that uses applied economic research and analysis
to provide a wide range of strategic advice to clients in the public and private sectors,
throughout New Zealand and Australia, and further afield.
NZIER is also known for its long-established Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion and
Quarterly Predictions.
Our aim is to be the premier centre of applied economic research in New Zealand. We
pride ourselves on our reputation for independence and delivering quality analysis in the
right form, and at the right time, for our clients. We ensure quality through teamwork on
individual projects, critical review at internal seminars, and by peer review at various
stages through a project by a senior staff member otherwise not involved in the project.
NZIER was established in 1958.
Authorship
Prepared by: Peter Clough & Daisy Shen
Quality approved by: John Yeabsley
Date: 27/07/2011 3:16 p.m.
Version: 5
Acknowledgements:
NZIER-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM i
Executive summary
This report provides an assessmentof the economic effects of the proposed Puketoi
wind farm by Mighty River Power, for the purpose of informing application for
resource consent. Given the focus of the RMA (RMA) on sustainable development,
economic efficiency of resource use in section 7 (b) and on the benefits of renewable
energy in section 7 (j), it uses a framework of cost benefit analysis for assessing
these effects.
The proposed Puketoiwindfarm is likely to inject $138 million to $171 million
expenditure into the local economy directly, and create 500 jobs locally during the
construction phase, and also add $12 million to $21 million per year of direct
expenditures once in operation. Such economic impacts can be significant in
stimulating economic activity more widely, but they are not unique to a given
development, and they are not informative about efficiency of natural and physical
resources.
More relevant for RMA considerations is the stream of benefits derived from the new
wind farm once it is operational, which stem from the harnessing of a hitherto free
resource (wind) to create a valuable commodity (electricity). This has implications for
those involved in supplying electricity, the consumers of electricity, and also third
parties dealing with its effects on the wider environment.
The fact that Mighty River Power wants to invest in Puketoiwindfarm indicates that
the company regards it as an efficient use of its resources. The critical question for
RMA purposes is whether Puketoiwindfarm would create effects external to the
company’s consideration that are so significant as to outweigh the efficiency benefit
of its use of natural resources.
In summary, the new windfarm would alleviate electricity supply risk caused by
recurring dry years, and contribute to stated government objectives for increasing
renewable generation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, as expressed in the
New Zealand Energy Strategy and the framework for greenhouse gas emissions
trading. Its economic effects can be expected to be:
Recovery of the windfarm operator’s long run costs from the viability of the project as
they would from any other investment, with a share of this going as enhanced benefit
for those who receive rentals for the land it occupies;
Minor benefits for power consumers, through:
• suppression of price rises, due to displacement of higher cost generation
sources;
• Defered grid investments and reduced transmission losses, any savings from
which would potentially pass through to all power consumers;
NZIER-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM
ii
• More than minor benefits from displacement of long distance power transmission
with associated losses;
Benefits, probably of substantial value, from the displacement of thermal generation
and avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions which comprise:
• benefits to the windfarm operator to the extent the emissions trading scheme
exposes emitters to the full cost of emissions under the Kyoto Protocol and any
successor international agreement;
• benefits to third parties (e.g. New Zealand tax payers) to the extent that emitters
are shielded from full cost of emissions by the government taking some
responsibility for meeting international obligations (as is currently the case given
the cap on emission prices under the emissions trading scheme), or should the
current government policy change in ways that shift liability for greenhouse
emissions away from the emitting sectors;
A balance of third party effects including:
• Potential disruptions to the site, mostly temporary, internalised in landowner
agreements and hence less than minor;
• Potential displacement of recreation and tourism activities, likely to be less than
minor, and possibly beneficial should the windfarm site attract sight-seers;
• Potential impacts on visual amenity, wildlife habitat etc (not assessed in this
report).
Quantified estimates are provided based on the assumed installed capacity of 159-
326 MW. The value to New Zealand of this new generation is indicated by the costs
of the next best alternative, assumed to be thermal generation.
NZIER-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM iii
Contents
1. Introduction 1
2. Framework of analysis and assumptions 3
2.1 Economics, Policy and the RMA 3
2.2 Components ofeconomicassessment 4
2.2.1 Components of cost benefit analysis of a windfarm 4
2.2.2 Components ofeconomic impact analysis of a windfarm 5
3. The existing environment 7
3.1 Electricity supply and demand in New Zealand 7
3.1.1 Forecast growth in electricity demand 8
3.1.2 Expected increase in generation capacity 10
3.2 The role ofwind in meeting electricity demand 14
3.3 National objectives and policy for electricity 16
4. Assessmentof actual and potential effects 20
4.1 PuketoiWindFarm and the local economy 20
4.2 Value ofwind generation obtained from Puketoiwindfarm 24
4.2.1 Wind power effects on the electricity system 27
4.2.2 Other potential effects ofPuketoiwindfarm 29
4.3 Assessmentof costs and benefits relevant to RMA 29
4.3.1 Effects on producers 30
4.3.2 Effects on consumers 31
4.3.3 Effects on third parties (environment) 33
4.4 Assessmentof the proposal against RMA’s criteria 35
5. Conclusions 38
Figures
Figure 1 Current generation across New Zealand 7
Figure 2 Electricity consumption forecasts 2009-2025 9
Figure 3 Mean monthly wholesale electricity prices 10
Figure 4 Recent trends in fossil fuel prices 12
Figure 5 Employment in national and local economies 23
Figure 6 Thermal generation and emission Costs 27
Figure 7 Summary ofeconomic effects 36
Figure 8 Summary of national and local benefits 39
NZIER-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM
1
1. Introduction
This report sets out a comprehensive economicassessmentof the proposed Puketoi
wind farm development, with particular reference to matters contained in Part II and
section 104 RMA. The proposed windfarm would be located along a ridge of the
Puketoi Range to the east of Woodville and Pahiatua. The electricity it generates
would feed into the national transmission grid at the Linton Substation located
between Palmerston North and the northern Tararua Ranges. The proposed wind
farm development envelope has 53 turbines, giving an installed capacity of 159-326
megawatts (MW).
Depending on the wind resource and efficiency of operations, wind farms in New
Zealand can achieve utilisation of between 33% and 45%. Existing wind farms at
other nearby locations have achieved utilisation rates at the upper end of this range,
and due to the exceptional quality of the wind resource the same is expected for the
Puketoi wind farm. Current expectation is that it is capable of producing 706-1272
GWh per year with a utilisation rate of 44.5%.
The purpose of the windfarm proposal is to harness a hitherto free natural resource,
wind, to create a valuable commodity, electricity. This is of value to the wind farm’s
operators, but also the wider community to the extent that it contributes to generation
capacity available to meet demands across the electricity system, and avoids the
resource costs and consequences of alternative generation.
As well as creating value by capturing the wind resource, the proposed windfarm will
also inject funds into the local economy, particularly during its construction stage, and
to a lesser extent during its operation. Critical variables on these local economic
impacts are its capital cost (and its staging over the construction period), its on-going
expenditures (particularly those on services and supplies that can be procured
locally), and the direct jobs created in both the construction and operation of the wind
farm. Site occupancy rental payments to landowners is another source ofeconomic
impact (or rather a particular form of local procurement expenditure).
As the RMA entails balancing tangible effects against less tangible ones, some
estimates of the likely magnitudes of measurable benefit are useful to the process of
reaching a decision. Mighty River Power operates on commercial principles and will
not proceed with Puketoiwindfarm unless it continues to expect it be of private
benefit to the company’s returns. So the economic issues of most interest for
resource management purposes are the likely external effects, i.e. those that are
outside the consideration of the developers. In the current case these include:
• The balance of environmental effects, both local effects (like effects on landscape
amenity) and global effects (like greenhouse gas emission displacement).
• Potential savings across the energy supply system.
NZIER-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM
2
• Potential value of the synergies obtained from co-ordinating Puketoiwindfarm
with other generation plant (e.g. hydro schemes).
• Achievement of stated objectives of government, such as those in the New
Zealand Energy Strategy.
Forecasting the likely uses ofwind power in the future is a complex task, but it is
possible to provide illustrative examples of the economic consequences ofPuketoi
wind farm, including cost savings, carbon emission reductions and changing patterns
of supply caused by a new wind farm, given plausible assumptions about how the
market would operate with and without it.
This report proceeds by:
• setting out a framework for considering economic effects (section 2);
• outlining the existing environment that the proposed Puketoiwindfarm will affect,
with particular attention to the electricity supply and demand (section 3);
• assessing Puketoiwind farm’s contribution to national economic well-being
(section 4);
• concluding with an overall assessmentofPuketoiwind farm’s economic effects
(section 5).
Sections 2 and 3 are by way of background on the general legislative, policy, and
electricity situation in New Zealand. Sections 4 and 5 are specific to the Puketoiwind
farm proposal, based on current expectations and available information.
[...]... informative of the resource use efficiency implied by section 7 (b) RMA This, and the difficulties of NZIER -ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF PUKETOI WINDFARM 23 constructing multipliers from a dated base model, mean it would not be a major part of an economic assessment of the Puketoiwindfarm 4.2 Value ofwind generation obtained from Puketoiwindfarm Because of its connection to the national grid, the economic. .. greenhouse gas emissions NZIER -ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF PUKETOI WINDFARM 19 4 Assessmentof actual and potential effects 4.1 PuketoiWindFarm and the local economy The proposed Puketoiwindfarm would be located in the Tararua District in the southern Manawatu region Its impact on the local economy will depend on the nature of the expenditures on the project and the characteristics of the economy receiving... residents of New Zealand Thus, the consumer benefits ofPuketoiwindfarm are relevant whether they are felt in the windfarm s vicinity or anywhere else within New Zealand 2.2.2 Components ofeconomic impact analysis of a windfarm An economic impact analysis has a narrower scope than a cost benefit analysis The elements of an impact analysis are: • Direct impacts: − Spending on construction in the wind farm. .. ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM 25 These estimates take the SRMC of gas and coal as indicative of the value of harnessing wind, which is appropriate for comparison of existing plant However, in comparing a prospective windfarm with existing thermal plant, it is necessary to take account of the capital cost of the windfarm and compare its long run marginal cost (LRMC) against the SRMC of the existing... generation of 42,000 GWh per year, 1% of which is 420 GWh and 125% of this, in turn, is 525 GWh 10 Electricity Technical Advisory Group and Ministry of Economic Development (2009) Improving Electricity Market Performance, Volume 2 – Appendices NZIER -ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM 13 However, the likely direction of future requirements is clear from population and economic growth, and adding new wind. .. detailed below The development of new renewable generation capacity, such as the proposed Puketoiwind farm, would contribute to government’s objectives of restraining greenhouse gas emissions and diversifying its mix of electricity generation away from the current dominance of hydro, which poses risks to the reliability and security of NZIER -ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM 3 supply during dry years... reduced probability of supply disruption – a quality improvement in electricity supply to the extent that more diversified supply reduces the dry-year risk and improves security of supply; • Effects on producers: − Benefit from the value of output from the wind farm; NZIER -ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM 4 − Benefit from any synergies that may be realised between the windfarm and other generation... national economic benefit Under current plans, Puketoiwindfarm would have an installed capacity of 159 to 326 MW, capable of generating 706 to 1272 GWh at 44.5% utilisation Each GWh despatched from Puketoiwindfarm will equate to less than 1 GWh consumption because of transmission losses between Puketoi and the markets served On average, transmission losses across the network are 3.8%28 of power... in the supply and demand for gas, new wind generation like Puketoiwindfarm will be competitive with even existing thermal generation 33 Electricity Commission, Statement of Opportunity 2008 (this edition provides stand alone generation cost) NZIER -ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM 26 Figure 6 Thermal generation and emission Costs Generation output net of transmission loss Generation Cost Carbon... Authority (2010) Generation Update – November 2010, http://www.ea.govt.nz/document/11979/download/industry/modelling/long-term-generationdevelopment/list -of- generation-projects/ NZIER -ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTOFPUKETOIWINDFARM 7 ranged between 2011 and 2020 Of this total new capacity, 58% would be wind powered and 11% hydro There is no economically viable way to store electricity in bulk, except indirectly .
NZIER -ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF PUKETOI WIND FARM i
Executive summary
This report provides an assessment of the economic effects of the proposed Puketoi
wind. Components of economic assessment 4
2.2.1 Components of cost benefit analysis of a wind farm 4
2.2.2 Components of economic impact analysis of a wind farm