Báo cáo khoa học: "Automatic Story Segmentation using a Bayesian Decision Framework for Statistical Models of Lexical Chain Features" pdf

Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pages 265–268, Suntec, Singapore, 4 August 2009. c 2009 ACL and AFNLP Automatic Story Segmentation using a Bayesian Decision Framework for Statistical Models of Lexical Chain Features Wai-Kit Lo Wenying Xiong Helen Meng The Chinese University The Chinese University The Chinese University of Hong Kong, of Hong Kong, of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Hong Kong, China Hong Kong, China wklo@se.cuhk.edu.hk wyxiong@se.cuhk.edu.hk hmmeng@se.cuhk.edu.hk Abstract This paper presents a Bayesian decision framework that performs automatic story segmentation based on statistical model- ing of one or more lexical chain features. Automatic story segmentation aims to lo- cate the instances in time where a story ends and another begins. A lexical chain is formed by linking coherent lexical items chronologically. A story boundary is often associated with a significant number of lexical chains ending before it, starting after it, as well as a low count of chains continuing through it. We devise a Bayesian framework to capture such be- havior, using the lexical chain features of start, continuation and end. In the scoring criteria, lexical chain starts/ends are modeled statistically with the Weibull and uniform distributions at story boun- daries and non-boundaries respectively. The normal distribution is used for lexi- cal chain continuations. Full combination of all lexical chain features gave the best performance (F1=0.6356). We found that modeling chain continuations contributes significantly towards segmentation per- formance. 1 Introduction Automatic story segmentation is an important precursor in processing audio or video streams in large information repositories. Very often, these continuous streams of data do not come with boundaries that segment them into semantically coherent units, or stories. The story unit is needed for a wide range of spoken language in- formation retrieval tasks, such as topic tracking, clustering, indexing and retrieval. To perform automatic story segmentation, there are three categories of cues available: lexical cues from transcriptions, prosodic cues from the audio stream and video cues such as anchor face and color histograms. Among the three types of cues, lexical cues are the most generic since they can work on text and multimedia sources. Previous approaches include TextTiling (Hearst 1997) that monitors changes in sentence similarity, use of cue phrases (Reynar 1999) and Hidden Markov Models (Yamron 1998). In addition, the ap- proach based on lexical chaining captures the content coherence by linking coherent lexical items (Morris and Hirst 1991, Hirst and St-Onge 1998). Stokes (2004) discovers boundaries by chaining up terms and locating instances of time where the count of chain starts and ends (boun- dary strength) achieves local maxima. Chan et al. (2007) enhanced this approach through statistical modeling of lexical chain starts and ends. We further extend this approach in two aspects: 1) a Bayesian decision framework is used; 2) chain continuations straddling across boundaries are taken into consideration and statistically modeled. 2 Experimental Setup Experiments are conducted using data from the TDT-2 Voice of America Mandarin broadcast. In particular, we only use the data from the long programs (40 programs, 1458 stories in total), each of which is about one hour in duration. The average number of words per story is 297. The news programs are further divided chronologi- cally into training (for parameter estimation of the statistical models), development (for tuning decision thresholds) and test (for performance evaluation) sets, as shown in Figure 1. Automatic speech recognition (ASR) outputs that are pro- vided in the TDT-2 corpus are used for lexical chain formation. 265 The story segmentation task in this work is to decide whether a hypothesized utterance boun- dary (provided in the TDT-2 data based on the speech recognition result) is a story boundary. Segmentation performance is evaluated using the F1-measure. 20 hour 10 hour 10 hour Feb.20th,1998 Mar.4th,1998 Mar.17th,1998 Apr.4th,1998 Training Set Development Set Test Set 697 stories 385 stories 376 stories 20 hour 10 hour 10 hour Feb.20th,1998 Mar.4th,1998 Mar.17th,1998 Apr.4th,1998 Training Set Development Set Test Set 697 stories 385 stories 376 stories Figure 1: Organization of the long programs in TDT-2 VOA Mandarin for our experiments. 3 Approach Our approach considers utterance boundaries that are labeled in the TDT-2 corpus and classifies them either as a story boundary or non-boundary. We form lexical chains from the TDT-2 ASR outputs by linking repeated words. Since words may also repeat across different stories, we limit the maximum distance between consecutive words within the lexical chain. This limit is op- timized according to the approach in (Chan et al. 2007) based on the training data. The optimal value is found to be 130.9sec for long programs. We make use of three lexical chain features: chain starts, continuations and ends. At the be- ginning of a story, new words are introduced more frequently and hence we observe many lex- ical chain starts. There is also tendency of many lexical chains ending before a story ends. As a result, there is a higher density of chain starts and ends in the proximity of a story boundary. Fur- thermore, there tends to be fewer chains strad- dling across a story boundary. Based on these characteristics of lexical chains, we devise a sta- tistical framework for story segmentation by modeling the distribution of these lexical chain features near the story boundaries. 3.1 Story Segmentation based on a Single Lexical Chain Feature Given an utterance boundary with the lexical chain feature, X, we compare the conditional probabilities of observing a boundary, B, or non- boundary, B , as < > )|()|( X B PXB P < > )|()|( X B PXB P . (1) where X is a single chain feature, which may be the chain start (S), chain continuation (C), or chain end (E). By applying the Bayes’ theorem, this can be rewritten as a likelihood ratio test, B x XP BXP θ )|( )|( < > B x XP BXP θ )|( )|( < > (2) for which the decision threshold is )(/)( BPBP x = θ , dependent on the a priori probability of observing boundary or a non- boundary. 3.2 Story Segmentation based on Combined Chain Features When multiple features are used in combination, we formulate the problem as ),,|(),,|( CESBPCESB P < > ),,|(),,|( CESBPCESB P < > . (3) By assuming that the chain features are condi- tionally independent of one another (i.e., P(S,C,E|B) = P(S|B) P(C|B) P(E|B)), the formu- lation can be rewritten as a likelihood ratio test < > SEC BCPBEPBSP BCPBEPBSP θ )|()|()|( )|()|()|( < > SEC BCPBEPBSP BCPBEPBSP θ )|()|()|( )|()|()|( . (4) 4 Modeling of Lexical Chain Features 4.1 Chain starts and ends We follow (Chan et al. 2007) to model the lexi- cal chain starts and ends at a story boundary with a statistical distribution. We apply a window around the candidate boundaries (same window size for both chain starts and ends) in our work. Chain features falling outside the window are excluded from the model. Figure 2 shows the distribution when a window size of 20 seconds is used. This is the optimal window size when chain start and end features are combined. 0 -2-4-6-8-10-12-14-16-18-20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 10 20 30 40 50 Offset from story boundary in second Number of lexical chain features Fitted Weibull dist. for lexical chain ends Frequency of lexical chain features Fitted Weibull dist. for lexical chain starts x 0 -2-4-6-8-10-12-14-16-18-20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 10 20 30 40 50 Offset from story boundary in second Number of lexical chain features Fitted Weibull dist. for lexical chain ends Frequency of lexical chain features Fitted Weibull dist. for lexical chain starts x Fitted Weibull dist. for lexical chain ends Frequency of lexical chain features Fitted Weibull dist. for lexical chain starts x Figure 2: Distribution of chain starts and ends at known story boundaries. The Weibull distribution is used to model these distributions. We also assume that the probability of seeing a lexical chain start / end at a particular instance is independent of the starts / ends of other chains. As a result, the probability of seeing a sequence of chain starts at a story boundary is given by the product of a sequence of Weibull distributions ∏ =       − −       = s k i N i t k i e tk BSP 1 1 )|( λ λλ , (5) 266 where S is the sequence of time with chain starts (S=[t 1 , t 2 , … t i , … t Ns ]), k s is the shape, λ s is the scale for the fitted Weibull distribution for chain starts, N s is the number of chain starts. The same formulation is similarly applied to chain ends. Figure 3 shows the frequency of raw feature points for lexical chain starts and ends near utter- ance boundaries that are non-story boundaries. Since there is no obvious distribution pattern for these lexical chain features near a non-story boundary, we model these characteristics with a uniform distribution. 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0 -2-4-6-8-10-12-14-16 0.1 Relative frequency of chain starts / ends Offset from utterance boundary in seconds (non-story boundaries only) Lexical chain starts / ends Fitted uniform dist. for lexical chain starts x Fitted uniform dist. for lexical chain ends 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0 -2-4-6-8-10-12-14-16 0.1 Relative frequency of chain starts / ends Offset from utterance boundary in seconds (non-story boundaries only) Lexical chain starts / ends Fitted uniform dist. for lexical chain starts x Fitted uniform dist. for lexical chain ends Lexical chain starts / ends Fitted uniform dist. for lexical chain starts x Fitted uniform dist. for lexical chain ends Figure 3: Distribution of chain starts and ends at ut- terance boundaries that are non-story boundaries. 4.2 Chain continuations Figure 4 shows the distributions of chain contin- uations near story boundary and non-story boun- dary. As one may expect, there are fewer lexical chains that straddle across a story boundary (the curve of )|( BCP ) when compared to a non-story boundary (the curve of )|( BCP ). Based on the observations, we model the probability of occur- rence of lexical chains straddling across a given story boundary or non-story boundary by a nor- mal distribution. 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 Probability 0 5 10 15 20 25 Number of chain continuations straddling across an utterance boundary Story boundary, )|( BCP Non-story boundary, )|( BCP Relative frequency of lexical chain continuation at an utterance boundary x Fitted distribution at story boundary Fitted distribution at non-story boundary 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 Probability 0 5 10 15 20 25 Number of chain continuations straddling across an utterance boundary Story boundary, )|( BCP Non-story boundary, )|( BCP Relative frequency of lexical chain continuation at an utterance boundary x Fitted distribution at story boundary Fitted distribution at non-story boundary Relative frequency of lexical chain continuation at an utterance boundary x Fitted distribution at story boundary Fitted distribution at non-story boundary Figure 4: Distributions of chain continuations at story boundaries and non-story boundaries. 5 Story Segmentation based on Combi- nation of Lexical Chain Features We trained the parameters of the Weibull distri- bution for lexical chain starts and ends at story boundaries, the uniform distribution for lexical chain start / end at non-story boundary, and the normal distribution for lexical chain continua- tions. Instead of directly using a threshold as shown in Equation (2), we optimize on the para- meter n, which is the optimal number of top scor- ing utterance boundaries that are classified as story boundaries in the development set. 5.1 Using Bayesian decision framework We compare the performance of the Bayesian decision framework to the use of likelihood only P(X|B) as shown in Figure 5. The results demon- strate consistent improvement in F1-measure when using the Bayesian decision framework. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 F1- measure )|( BSP )|( BEP )|( )|( B SP BSP )|( )|( BEP BEP 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 F1- measure )|( BSP )|( BSP )|( BEP )|( BEP )|( )|( B SP BSP )|( )|( B SP BSP )|( )|( BEP BEP )|( )|( BEP BEP Figure 5: Story segmentation performance in F1- measure when using single lexical chain features. 5.2 Modeling multiple features jointly 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 F1- measure (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) )|( )|( (c) BEP BEP )|( )|( (d) BCP BCP )|()|( )|()|( (e) BEPBSP BEPBSP )|()|( )|()|( (f) BCPBSP BCPBSP )|()|( )|()|( (g) BCPBEP BCPBEP )|()|()|( )|()|()|( (h) BCPBEPBSP BCPBEPBSP )|( )|( (b) BSP BSP ]2007[),(core (a) Chan E S S 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 F1- measure (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) )|( )|( (c) BEP BEP )|( )|( (d) BCP BCP )|()|( )|()|( (e) BEPBSP BEPBSP )|()|( )|()|( (f) BCPBSP BCPBSP )|()|( )|()|( (g) BCPBEP BCPBEP )|()|()|( )|()|()|( (h) BCPBEPBSP BCPBEPBSP )|( )|( (b) BSP BSP ]2007[),(core (a) Chan E S S Figure 6: Results of F1-measure comparing the seg- mentation results using different statistical models of lexical chain features. We further compare the performance of various scoring methods including single and combined lexical chain features. The baseline result is ob- tained using a scoring function based on the like- lihoods of seeing a chain start or end at a story boundary (Chan et al. 2007) which is denoted as Score(S, E). Performance from other methods based on the same dataset can be referenced from Chan et al. 2007 and will not be repeated here. The best story segmentation performance is achieved by combining all lexical chain features which achieves an F1-measure of 0.6356. All improvements have been verified to be statisti- cally significant (α=0.05). By comparing the re- sults of (e) to (h), (c) to (g), and (b) to (f), we can see that lexical chain continuation feature contri- butes significantly and consistently towards story segmentation performance. 267 5.3 Analysis Utterance boundary (occurs at 664 second in document VOM19980317_0900_1000, which is not a story boundary) time 5 10-5-10 11 chain continuations: W 1 [选出 选出选出 选出], W 2 [总理 总理总理 总理], W 3 [职务 职务职务 职务], W 4 [基本上 基本上基本上 基本上], W 5 [年代 年代年代 年代], W 6 [就是 就是就是 就是], W 7 [中国 中国中国 中国], W 8 [中央 中央中央 中央], W 9 [主席 主席主席 主席], W 10 [都是 都是都是 都是], W 11 [国家 国家国家 国家] 15-15 W 1 5 [ 人 士 人 士 人 士 人 士 ] W 1 6 [ 方 面 方 面 方 面 方 面 ] W 1 7 [ 委 员 会 委 员 会 委 员 会 委 员 会 ] W 1 8 [ 军 事 军 事 军 事 军 事 ] W 1 9 [ 连 任 连 任 连 任 连 任 ] W 2 0 [ 万 年 万 年 万 年 万 年 ] W 2 1 [ 浩 田 浩 田 浩 田 浩 田 ] W 1 2 [ 人 选 人 选 人 选 人 选 ] W 1 3 [ 最 高 最 高 最 高 最 高 ] W 1 4 [ 就 说 就 说 就 说 就 说 ] t s1 t s2 t s3 t s4 t s5 t s6 t s7 t e1 t e2 t e3 Utterance boundary (occurs at 664 second in document VOM19980317_0900_1000, which is not a story boundary) time 5 10-5-10 11 chain continuations: W 1 [选出 选出选出 选出], W 2 [总理 总理总理 总理], W 3 [职务 职务职务 职务], W 4 [基本上 基本上基本上 基本上], W 5 [年代 年代年代 年代], W 6 [就是 就是就是 就是], W 7 [中国 中国中国 中国], W 8 [中央 中央中央 中央], W 9 [主席 主席主席 主席], W 10 [都是 都是都是 都是], W 11 [国家 国家国家 国家] 15-15 W 1 5 [ 人 士 人 士 人 士 人 士 ] W 1 6 [ 方 面 方 面 方 面 方 面 ] W 1 7 [ 委 员 会 委 员 会 委 员 会 委 员 会 ] W 1 8 [ 军 事 军 事 军 事 军 事 ] W 1 9 [ 连 任 连 任 连 任 连 任 ] W 2 0 [ 万 年 万 年 万 年 万 年 ] W 2 1 [ 浩 田 浩 田 浩 田 浩 田 ] W 1 2 [ 人 选 人 选 人 选 人 选 ] W 1 3 [ 最 高 最 高 最 高 最 高 ] W 1 4 [ 就 说 就 说 就 说 就 说 ] t s1 t s2 t s3 t s4 t s5 t s6 t s7 t e1 t e2 t e3 Figure 7: Lexical chain starts, ends and continuations in the proximity of a non-story boundary. W i [xxxx] denotes the i-th Chinese word “xxxx”. Figure 7 shows an utterance boundary that is a non-story boundary. There is a high concentra- tion of chain starts and ends near the boundary which leads to a misclassification if we only combine chain starts and ends for segmentation. However, there are also a large number of chain continuations across the utterance boundary, which implies that a story boundary is less likely. The full combination gives the correct decision. Utterance boundary (occurs at 2014 second in document VOM19980319_0900_1000, which is a story boundary) time 10 201020 t s1 t s3 t e4 t e5 t e6 t e1 t e2 t e3 t s2 6 chain continuations: W 1 [领导人 领导人领导人 领导人], W 2 [要求 要求要求 要求], W 3 [委员会 委员会委员会 委员会], W 4 [社会 社会社会 社会], W 5 [问题 问题问题 问题, W 6 [国际 国际国际 国际] W 1 3 [ 阿 尔 巴 尼 亚 阿 尔 巴 尼 亚 阿 尔 巴 尼 亚 阿 尔 巴 尼 亚 ] W 1 4 [ 塞 尔 维 亚 塞 尔 维 亚 塞 尔 维 亚 塞 尔 维 亚 ] W 1 5 [ 总 统 总 统 总 统 总 统 ] W 1 2 [ 成 员 成 员 成 员 成 员 ] W 1 1 [ 议 会 议 会 议 会 议 会 ] W 1 0 [ 柬 埔 寨 柬 埔 寨 柬 埔 寨 柬 埔 寨 ] W 9 [ 时 候 时 候 时 候 时 候 ] W 8 [ 大 选 大 选 大 选 大 选 ] W 7 [ 宪 法 宪 法 宪 法 宪 法 ] Utterance boundary (occurs at 2014 second in document VOM19980319_0900_1000, which is a story boundary) time 10 201020 t s1 t s3 t e4 t e5 t e6 t e1 t e2 t e3 t s2 6 chain continuations: W 1 [领导人 领导人领导人 领导人], W 2 [要求 要求要求 要求], W 3 [委员会 委员会委员会 委员会], W 4 [社会 社会社会 社会], W 5 [问题 问题问题 问题, W 6 [国际 国际国际 国际] W 1 3 [ 阿 尔 巴 尼 亚 阿 尔 巴 尼 亚 阿 尔 巴 尼 亚 阿 尔 巴 尼 亚 ] W 1 4 [ 塞 尔 维 亚 塞 尔 维 亚 塞 尔 维 亚 塞 尔 维 亚 ] W 1 5 [ 总 统 总 统 总 统 总 统 ] W 1 2 [ 成 员 成 员 成 员 成 员 ] W 1 1 [ 议 会 议 会 议 会 议 会 ] W 1 0 [ 柬 埔 寨 柬 埔 寨 柬 埔 寨 柬 埔 寨 ] W 9 [ 时 候 时 候 时 候 时 候 ] W 8 [ 大 选 大 选 大 选 大 选 ] W 7 [ 宪 法 宪 法 宪 法 宪 法 ] Figure 8: Lexical chain starts, ends and continuations in the proximity of a story boundary. Figure 8 shows another example where an ut- terance boundary is misclassified as a non-story boundary when only the combination of lexical chain starts and ends are used. Incorporation of the chain continuation feature helps rectify the classification. From these two examples, we can see that the incorporation of chain continuation in our story segmentation framework can complement the features of chain starts and ends. In both exam- ples above, the number of chain continuations plays a crucial role in correct identification of a story boundary. 6 Conclusions We have presented a Bayesian decision frame- work that performs automatic story segmentation based on statistical modeling of one or more lex- ical chain features, including lexical chain starts, continuations and ends. Experimentation shows that the Bayesian decision framework is superior to the use of likelihoods for segmentation. We also experimented with a variety of scoring crite- ria, involving likelihood ratio tests of a single feature (i.e. lexical chain starts, continuations or ends), their pair-wise combinations, as well as the full combination of all three features. Lexical chain starts/ends are modeled statistically with the Weibull and normal distributions for story boundaries and non-boundaries. The normal dis- tribution is used for lexical chain continuations. Full combination of all lexical chain features gave the best performance (F1=0.6356). Model- ing chain continuations contribute significantly towards segmentation performance. Acknowledgments This work is affiliated with the CUHK MoE- Microsoft Key Laboratory of Human-centric Compu- ting and Interface Technologies. We would also like to thank Professor Mari Ostendorf for suggesting the use of continuing chains and Mr. Kelvin Chan for providing information about his previous work. References Chan, S. K. et al. 2007. “Modeling the Statistical Be- haviour of Lexical Chains to Capture Word Cohe- siveness for Automatic Story Segmentation”, Proc. of INTERSPEECH-2007. Hearst, M. A. 1997. “TextTiling: Segmenting Text into Multiparagraph Subtopic Passages”, Computa- tional Linguistics, 23(1), pp. 33–64. Hirst, G. and St-Onge, D. 1998. “Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms”, WordNet: An Elec- tronic Lexical Database, pp. 305–332. Morris, J. and Hirst, G. 1991. “Lexical cohesion com- puted by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text”, Computational Linguistics, 17(1), pp. 21–48. Reynar, J.C. 1999, “Statistical models for topic seg- mentation”, Proc. 37th annual meeting of the ACL, pp. 357–364. Stokes, N. 2004. Applications of Lexical Cohesion Analysis in the Topic Detection and Tracking Do- main, PhD thesis, University College Dublin. Yamron, J.P. et al. 1998, “A hidden Markov model approach to text segmentation and event tracking”, Proc. ICASSP 1998, pp. 333–336. 268 . fewer chains strad- dling across a story boundary. Based on these characteristics of lexical chains, we devise a sta- tistical framework for story segmentation. lexical chain starts x Fitted uniform dist. for lexical chain ends Lexical chain starts / ends Fitted uniform dist. for lexical chain starts x Fitted uniform