Luận văn thạc sĩ VNU ULIS improving english speaking skill of 4th graders by using readers theater an action research project at an english center in yên bái

Rationale

In order to master any language, learners have to practice all 4 skills, namely listening, speaking, reading and writing As Rivers (2002) argues, speaking is used twice as much as reading and writing in our communication Therefore, developing learners‟ speaking skill is of vital importance in language programs in general, and EFL/ESL programs in particular Richard and Renandya (2002) also believe that speaking is one of the central elements of communication in EFL teaching It is a skill that needs special attention and instruction However, to many students, speaking seems to be the most challenging skill to develop Brown and Lee (2015) state that learning to speak a foreign language is often considered one of the most difficult for students to learn

When learning speaking, learners are expected to be competent in using various language elements such as vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation, amongst others, and it is so important to activate these elements in the process of teaching/learning

There are many factors that may affect students‟ performance, for instance, the lack of opportunities to practice speaking in meaningful contexts Besides, class size and mixed ability class also reduce general learners‟ motivation in acquiring EFL speaking skill The students at an English center in Yen Bai, where the author is working, are no exception They experience different problems with regards to speaking

Firstly, from my own observation, lack of students‟ speaking proficiency is the problem Their vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation are low, which make them unable to speak up during the speaking class In language teaching class, students rarely answer the questions given by the teacher orally It also takes them quite some time to produce an answer because they speak with a lot of pauses and they get difficulties in finding appropriate words to express their ideas

The next problem is that students have low motivation in learning speaking

They have little chance to use English in their daily life and speaking activities for students to practice in class are also limited and boring Furthermore, a number of techniques and strategies used in speaking classes at the center are not effective in supporting students‟ improvement in communication in the target language Activities in speaking classes are generally routines, while, as stated by Brown and Lee (2015, p

48), “routine activities in learning can make students bored As a result, their motivation and participation in learning will decrease” Learning activities become monotonous and less challenging Therefore, students are not enthusiastic and interested in joining speaking activities

Another problem is that students often lack confidence in speaking English

They tend to be passive in speaking lessons They are shy when using the target language in front of their teacher, and their mates Students are also afraid of making mistakes and being laughed at by their friends when they speak English

Consequently, students usually avoid using English in class and prefer using their native language when answering questions or working in pairs or groups with their mates and their teacher This has been confirmed by many researchers: Psychological factors such as anxiety or shyness, lack of confidence, lack of motivation, and fear of mistakes commonly hinder students from speaking (Nunan, 1999; Sato, 2003;

One more problem that affects students‟ speaking skill improvement is the lack of authentic input and output (Zhang, 2009) in which students can apply the language elements they have learnt meaningfully Students rarely have opportunities to practice the target language beyond the classroom; they often learn monotonously in speaking lessons, with the traditional method focusing mainly on listening and repeating language elements The lack of application is the main reason why not a small number of students can get very high scores at exam, but cannot use their English in real life situations

One possible solution to such problems comes from teachers who play a crucial role in creating opportunities for students to practice speaking skill Such chances can be created by applying various methods, including discussion, drama, role play, information gap, simulations, etc Among those alternatives, Readers Theater (henceforth RT) activity seems to be one of students‟ favorite

RT is a drama technique that is suitable for students at all levels because actors can play the story they have read without having to memorize the scripts RT creates opportunities for students to take part in practice activities as active participants rather than passive ones According to Thornburry (2011), speaking activities involving drama elements provide a useful catalyst for real-life language use because learners take an imaginative leap beyond classroom boundaries RT is expected to help improve students‟ enthusiasm in practicing speaking in class and solve several students‟ problems in learning speaking

However, RT seems to be new in the country, so the author would like to carry out an action research using RT in the classroom of the English center where the author is teaching to improve students‟ speaking competence The study is entitled

“Improving English speaking skill of 4 th graders by using Readers Theater”.

Objectives

The objective of this action research first is to uncover how RT improves speaking skill among the students at the center The second is to find out more information on students‟ attitudes towards the practice of RT in their speaking class, the disadvantages, if any, that students may encounter besides its advantages

Generally, the study aims to see how RT works with this group of students in a local Vietnamese context.

Research Questions

To deliver the objectives stated above, the following research questions must be addressed:

RQ1: How is the students‟ speaking skill improved thanks to the application of RT?

RQ2: How do the students respond to RT?

Also, through the study, I could see what works well and what not so well so that necessary precautions can be provided to subsequent users of RT in similar contexts

The findings lead to both practical and theoretical contributions Firstly, they help other teachers in their application of RT on a wider scale in similar contexts in the country and/or integrated in current training curriculum as a regular activity

Secondly, they contribute to the understanding of RT and its application in local contexts.

Methodology

In line with the objectives of this research, a classroom action research which consisted of two cycles was conducted Each cycle of action research was carried out by applying the model of action research proposed by Kemmis and Mc Taggart (1988, as cited in Burns, 2010, p 7) By using this model, each research cycle passed through four broad phrases, namely planning, action, observation, and reflection The initial cycles of these four phrases lead to a second cycle in which the reflections of the previous cycle provided the information for the researcher to make the next cycle plan

Figure 1: The cycle of action research model Kemmis and Mc Taggart

To answer the above-mentioned research questions, qualitative data in form of descriptions were collected; at the same time, the researcher collected data that can be measured and represented in numbers The qualitative data were collected from field notes and video recordings On the other hand, the quantitative data were from the scores of the student‟s speaking performances and the results of the questionnaires

The teacher‟ field notes, video recordings, students‟ test scores were used to evaluate the improvement of students‟ speaking skill Some caution when applying RT in class was also noted through the observation process A questionnaire survey was conducted to find out the students‟ responses to the implementation of RT in speaking class.

Significance

Practical Significance

This present study seeks to provide another fruitful option for EFL programs in Yen Bai and perhaps elsewhere English teachers may well implement RT in their speaking classes, and gradually apply this model to improve reading, listening and writing skills What is more, the present study also attempts to diminish the negative effect of class size and mixed ability class, and to some extents, ease the teacher‟s burden in designing extra teaching materials as well as motivating students to speak in speaking classes Last but not least, with RT, students should have a chance to work with others, learn with others, and thoroughly enjoy the moment of „real drama‟ in a theater.

Theoretical Significance

Theoretically, this research may contribute to understanding of the use of Reader Theater in language teaching and learning, especially in teaching speaking in the local context of the country Also, this study used a mixed method approach to investigate the effectiveness of RT in promoting speaking skill, which proves the feasibility of mixed method approach in doing RT research.

Organization of the Thesis

This thesis pictures an action research which encompasses 3 chapters, apart from the Introduction, Conclusion and necessary Annexes The Introduction presents general background information on the study, the rationale, the aims, the research questions, the significance of the study, and organization of the thesis Chapter 1 reviews relevant literature and previous studies with regard to the implementation of

RT in teaching and learning Chapter 2 describes the methodology of the research, including research design, research procedure, research materials, method of data collection, research instruments, the process of implementation RT in teaching, and data analysis Chapter 3 presents the findings and discussion, and the Conclusion finalizes the thesis.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Speaking

The word speaking has many different meanings in linguistics‟ views Oxford Dictionary ("Speaking," 2018), speaking is “the action of conveying information or expressing one's thoughts and feelings in spoken languages.” Johns (1981) defines speaking as a productive skill Like writing, it involves using the organs of speech to express meanings to other people Burns and Joyce (1997) and Luoma (2004), however, considered speaking an interactive process of constructing meaning that involves producing, receiving and processing information Its form and meaning are dependent on the context in which it occurs, including the participants themselves, their collective experiences, the physical environment, and the purposes for speaking

It is often spontaneous, open-ended, and evolving However, speech is not always unpredictable Speaking requires that learners not only know how to understand the knowledge of language such as grammar, pronunciation, or vocabulary seen as linguistic competence but also that they understand when, where, why and in what ways to produce language, sociolinguistic competence Thornbury (2011), on the other hand, treats speaking as a skill, like playing the guitar or of driving a car He believes speaking involves certain skills and several different types of knowledge

They are extra-linguistic knowledge, i.e the knowledge of the sociocultural norms, culture, topic, the context and relationship to other speakers and linguistic knowledge that comprises of genre, discourse, and pragmatic knowledge (Thornbury, 2011) With reference to genre knowledge, he distinguishes between two main purposes for speaking: transactional and interpersonal The former relates to conveying information and exchange of goods and services and the latter to creating and maintaining social relations

To sum up, speaking is both a productive skill and an interactional process, which is subject to a number of influential factors such as context, relationship, socio- cultural knowledge, amongst others.

1.1.2 Micro- and Macro-Speaking Skills

As explained by Brown (2004, p 142), speaking covers micro- and macro- skills These skills should be recognized as the guideline in assessing the students‟ speaking performance Micro-skills "refer to producing the smaller chunks of language such as phonemes, morphemes, words, collocations, and phrasal units” On the other hand, macro-skills "imply the speaker's focus on the larger elements: fluency, discourse, function, style, cohesion, nonverbal communication, and strategic options” He also adds that there are some different purposes of micro- and macro- skills of oral production Some of those used in this research are hereunder presented

1) Produce chunks of language of different lengths;

2) Produce English stress patterns, words in stressed and unstressed positions, rhythmic structure, and intonation contours;

3) Produce reduced forms of words and phrases;

4) Produce fluent speech at different rates of delivery;

5) Produce speech in natural constituents: in appropriate phrases, pause groups, breath groups, and sentence constituents

Regarding the same reference, some of macro-skills are as follows:

1) Appropriately accomplish communicative functions according to situations, participants, and goals;

2)Use appropriate styles, registers, implicature, redundancies, pragmatic conventions, conversation rules, floor keeping and yielding, interrupting, and other sociolinguistic features in face-to-face conversations;

3) Convey facial features, kinesics, body language, and other nonverbal cues along with verbal language.

Teaching Speaking

In English teaching and learning processes, speaking skill is considered one of the most important skills that learners need to acquire in order to be able to communicate using the target language Nunan (1999) and Burkart & Sheppard (2004) argue that success in learning a language is measured in terms of the ability to carry out a conversation in the (target) language Therefore, speaking is probably a priority for most learners of English (Florez, 1998)

Speaking is "the process of building and sharing meaning through the use of verbal and non-verbal symbols, in a variety of contexts" (Chaney & Burk, 1998, p

12) Speaking is a highly complicated and dynamic skill that requires the simultaneous combination of cognitive ability, cultural awareness and physical attempts to perform an act of speaking in real time communication Teaching speaking skill is not just as having students repeat of drills or memory of dialogues, it is a complexity process of teaching them the knowledge of speaking, skills and strategies In teaching speaking, teachers should strive to improve their students‟ vocabulary and confidence by creating opportunities which will enable them to use the language within authentic context and learn in meaning full context (Brown & Lee, 2015)

According to Nunan (2003), “teaching speaking” is to teach ESL learners to:

- produce the English speech sounds and sound patterns;

- use word and sentence stress, intonation patterns and the rhythm of the second language;

- select appropriate words and sentences according to the proper social setting, audience, situation and subject matter;

- organize their thoughts in a meaningful and logical sequence;

- use language as a means of expressing values and judgments;

- use the language quickly and confidently with few unnatural pauses, which is called as fluency (Nunan, 2003)

Goh & Burns (2012) mentioned the three components of second language speaking competences and also explained in detail how each component works and affects each other According to them, there are three components The first component is gaining knowledge of language and discourse, which requires students to understand and master the language‟s pronunciation, comprehend the vocabulary and grammar and know how to organize a different type of speech The ultimate goal of this component is to help speakers gaining social acceptance when speaking the target language (Burns & Goh, 2012) The next components is core speaking skill, which focuses on developing fluency of the speech, students‟ negotiation and monitoring skills, and their ability to manage the speech The final components are strategies; it is about building cognitive strategies to deal with the insufficiency of the speakers‟ language knowledge Strategies emphasize on using circumlocution, gesture, word creation, approximation or avoidance to compensate the limitation of the speakers in terms of language knowledge

Brown (2015, pp 257-267) discussed the principles of teaching speaking that can be summarized as follows:

1 Use technique that cover the spectrum of learners needs, from language-based focus on accuracy to message-based focus on interaction, meaning and fluency;

3 Encourage the use of authentic language in meaningful contexts;

4 Provide appropriate feedback and correction;

5 Capitalize on the natural link between speaking and listening;

6 Give students opportunities to initiate oral communication

7 Encourage the development of speaking strategies

Teaching speaking requires teachers not only help students know how to produce specific elements of language such as grammar, pronunciation, or vocabulary but also make them understand the structural and systematical speaking knowledge, when, why and in what ways to produce language More importantly, it is the teachers‟ instructions which play a vital role in fostering the improvement of the students‟ speaking skill in such specific language aspects as pronunciation, developing communication strategies or using appropriate gesture to support speaking, etc.

Readers Theater

Readers Theater has its origins in ancient Greece and was first introduced as a minimal theater in support of literature and reading It was originally developed as a means to present literary works in dramatic form RT allows students to engage in creative writing through adding and recreating lines in a story script, and by providing introductory and transitional details as they adapt a piece of literature into dramatic form (Shepard, 2006) RT is an oral interpretation of a story presented as a mini- theater production; besides, it is a literature-based oral reading which communicates story through oral interpretation (Walker, 1998) In RT, the readers read aloud directly from the script with expressive intonation and facial expression “Reader‟s Theater is an interpretive reading activity in which readers use their voices to bring characters to life” (Martinez, Roser, & Strecker, 1998) It is dependent on the ability of readers‟ voice and expression to capture the listeners‟ attention (Sloyer, 1982) Based on Shepard (2004), there are many styles of RT, but nearly all share these features: (a) Narration serves as the framework of dramatic presentation; (b) No full stage sets If used at all, sets are simple and suggestive; (c) No full costumes If used at all, costumes are partial and suggestive, or neutral and uniform; (d) No full memorization

Scripts are used openly in performance

According to Worthy & Prater (2002), the readers first read a story and then transform the story into a script involving several characters A wide range of texts can be used for Reader Theatre purposes These may be fictional texts, such as narratives, short stories, folk tales, myths and extracts from novels, or non-fiction texts, such as biographies and autobiographies, diaries, speeches, letters, newspaper articles and historical documents (Black & Stave, 2007) Texts that pupils have written themselves can also be used for Readers Theatre (Hoyt, 1992) Whatever text is used, it is necessary to adapt it for group reading by dividing it up into smaller units, often at the sentence level, which different readers are allocated Patrick (2008) writes that these are four basic steps in Readers Theatre as follows:

1 Readers first read a story, and then

2 Make selective and analytical choices in transforming the story into a script through social negotiation,

3 Formulate, practice and refine their interpretations, and

4 Finally perform for an audience, reading aloud from hand-held scripts

“The goal of Reader‟s Theater is to read a script in which the story theme and character development are conveyed to the audience through intonation, inflection, and fluency” (McAndrews, 2004).

Advantages of Readers Theater in Teaching and Learning Speaking Skill

Readers Theater is one of many types of drama activities which have been used in teaching language for a long time Having been used to teach foreign languages since middle ages, drama plays an important role to learn target language and culture

Nathan and Stanovich (1991) indicate that incorporating drama within the classroom has distinctive and defining elements of language development Drama is pedagogy that reaches students of multiple intelligences and different learning styles It is a multi-sensory mode of learning that engages mind, body, senses and emotions to create personal connections to the real world and helps to improve comprehension and retention (Prochazka, 2007) Drama is considered an effective method in teaching foreign language because it provides meaningful contexts for learners to practice the target language Dougill (1987) indicates that the drama activities in classroom could encourage them to use their language to speak in meaningful dialogues It can help increase students‟ motivation in learning English, reduce anxiety and enhance language acquisition, especially speaking Through drama, students can gain greater experience in using the language and be more willing to share their feelings and views with other members within a secure environment If the teacher and the learner are able to use drama to create roles and situations, there will be a greater variety of different contexts for talk (Neelands, 1992)

RT has been proved to have several benefits for language skills, including listening, speaking, reading and writing RT offers a visual, oral, and audio stimulus for students; it attracts students‟ interest and attention through drama It incorporates all four skills, literary materials, and provides motivation for students in a communicative context (Flynn, 2004; Kelleher, 1997) In other words, RT can improve listening, speaking, reading and writing skills (Huang, 2006) RT performs a plot of meaning-making for the aim of communication and, spiriting with an audience (Neelands, 1992) Jordan and Harrell (2000) recognize RT as an effective drama activity for providing authentic speech practice, especially in teaching reading fluency (rate, accuracy, phrasing, pitch, stress and expressiveness) as well as facilitating comprehension for beginning readers They suggested that “involving students with enjoyable and exciting active reading procedures provide the key to fluency and higher levels of comprehension gain, through a natural process of repeated readings and interactive transactions with language” (Jordan & Harrell, 2000, p 74) According to Shepard (2006), Readers Theater allows students to engage in creative writing through adding and recreating lines in a story script, and by providing introductory and transitional details as they adapt a piece of literature into dramatic form Readers Theater will benefit EFL students because it has the following key features:

1 Students interpret the story orally, rather than act it out

2 Students don‟t try to become the characters, like actors do, although they use their voices and gestures to bring life to the characters

3 Students don‟t have to memorize lines They take their reading texts or scripts on stage with them – even if they don‟t use them

4 Students don‟t need elaborate costumes

5 Students don‟t need special sets or props

Readers Theatre is a holistic method that integrates reading, speaking, listening and thinking (Rinehart, 1999) It is a collective, all-inclusive reading activity, allowing readers of different levels of reading ability to participate in a non-threatening, controlled and prepared setting‟ (Black & Stave, 2007, p 4) Some of RT advantages are related to the factors affecting speaking skill They are:

1 Readers Theater boosts listening and speaking skills

2 Students are trained to speak at an appropriate rate with accuracy, proper phrasing, and expression

3 Readers Theater improves sight word recognition

4 Readers Theater improves students‟ confidence

5 Students‟ ownership and engagement in the process is high

6 Readers Theatre supports the learning of bodily-kinesthetic learners

7 Collaboration and teamwork and emphasized skills

8 Readers Theater promotes cooperative interaction with peers

9 Readers Theater encourages social interaction during reading time

10 Readers Theater encourages practice at home with family members and friends (Buzzeo, 2006)

Hill (1990) states that, in creating Readers Theater scripts, students increase their knowledge of language structure (vocabulary, syntax and meaning), language use (forms and functions of language use) and their metalinguistic awareness (the ability to talk about language) Dougill (1987, p 22) outlines two important reasons why scripts are of particular value to language learning Firstly, scripts provide a rich source of comprehensible input in language that is natural and spoken This is in contrast to the atomistic approach of much of the language skill found in many course books where language is broken down into sentences or even smaller units and moreover, what spoken language is contained therein often takes the form of unrealistic (and uninvolving) slices of dialogue that have little value in terms of style or humor Secondly, script also offers psychological security to the students This is particularly applicable to EFL learners who generally exhibit language anxiety (Horwitz, 1986) particularly in English oral proficiency and are looking for a secure starting point Berlinger (2000), recognizing the benefits of scripted dialogues in encouraging English expressions, argues that scripts have long been employed in ESL instruction because they permit students to actively acquire the vocabulary, idioms, grammar and syntax of English speech He also points out that such dialogues involve all aspects of language In addition, scripts that are rehearsed in class can offer students a dynamic encounter that comes closest to real communication

Since the writing of scripts involves all aspects of language, Readers Theater should enable EFL students to acquire language in a real communicative context and allows creativity Readers Theater would help EFL students to improve their oral communication skills In addition, there are also other benefits for students such as their capacity to imagine is extended Hearing well-written stories reinforce their use of language skills, encourage them to read with avidity, and stimulates concentrated listening (Sloyer, 1982)

Because RT emphasizes oral and facial expressions, RT can help students enhance their English oral abilities RT provides a meaningful context that reduces students‟ nervousness, encourages students to speak, even the most reluctant or quietest student Through oral reading performances, all students have the opportunity to practice their speaking, gradually increase their confidence in speaking in front of others, and finally succeed in performing the script for an audience (Huang, 2006) In

RT, each student only reads small chunks of words at a time because the scripts are divided among several readers This also helps students lower their anxiety When performing on the stage, students look at the script and read their parts; therefore, they are free of memorization the text When the readers are free of the anxiety of memorization of a text, they can concentrate on other aspects of the drama (Trousdale

& Harris, 1993, p 202), pay attention to articulation, pronunciation, fluency and projection when reading (Black & Stave, 2007, p 7) Besides, RT emphasizes not only words, structures, and pronunciation but also thoughts, motivations and comprehension (Miccoli, 2003) Finally, after students use RT, they can make significant progress in oral skills (Tian & Wu, 2012)

When doing RT, students have to work in groups in most of the steps which involve a lot of discussion When writing scripts, students discuss which line should be said by which character, which should be added and which should be omitted The discussion requires student understand the words, the structures, and the whole story deeply Latrobe (1996) states that students feel confident of writing a script based on literary texts The instruction of RT script writing is to focus on teaching students how to write down ideas, and how to have the ideas organized in a systematic as well as efficient way (Lee, 2010; Styles & Dunn, 1989) When rehearsing, students discuss the characters and their characteristics They talk about what the tones, intonations, and expressions are more suitable for reading and they read the script repeatedly and silently Being a part of the group, they have to practice correct pronunciation, intonation, and expression when reading the text repeatedly Flynn (2004, p 361) argues that the teamwork in RT motivates readers to be attentive because one always wants to do one‟s best when one is together with others Even for the purpose to make their reading performance better, students are willing to spend extra time practicing oral skills When conquering fears and being willing to take risks in speaking in front of others, students make significant progress in improvement of oral skills along with realizing the underlined oral

As RT brings about so many benefits to students and teachers, why not apply it in a local context to see how local students respond, what benefits it offers the most, what may not work in the local context, what can be improved in RT application – these again confirm the necessity to do this action research of mine.

How is Readers Theater Applied and Studied around the World?

RT is a group reading experience that has its roots in the old traditions of story- telling in ancient Greece (Drew, 2013) RT has been used as a method in schools, especially in the USA in first language Since the 1950s During the 1960s, Reader’s Theater became popular among college theater departments and from there it spread to secondary English education Although not widely practiced as a form of theatre today, RT has continued to be used in schools in mother tongue contexts (Chard &

Tyler, 2000; Peebles, 2007), and has also been applied to foreign language classrooms (Chan & Chan, 2009; Drew & Pedersen, 2010)

The practice of RT in schools has led to a number of studies on its educational value in mother tongue contexts (Chard & Tyler, 2000; Flynn, 2004; Martinez et al., 1998; Rinehart, 1999) and foreign language classroom environments (Chan & Chan, 2009; Drew, 2013; Drew & Pedersen, 2010)

Research on RT has shown that RT not only benefits pupils‟ cognitive skills but also their motivation and confidence to read aloud On the effects of RT on pupils‟ cognitive skills RT has shown benefits in areas such as word recognition (Millin &

Rinehart, 1999; Samuels, 1997), pronunciation (Trousdale & Harris, 1993), fluency (Martinez et al., 1998) and comprehension (M E McKay, 2008; Rasinski, 2006) In reference to the affective benefits, studies show that RT has a positive influence on pupils‟ motivation (Black & Stave, 2007; Casey & Chamberlain, 2006; Millin &

Rinehart, 1999; Peebles, 2007; Worthy & Prater, 2002) Pupils who would otherwise have been reluctant to read aloud individually, thrive in the role of being part of a group of readers with collective responsibility for the text (Black & Stave, 2007)

Through collaboration and interaction while reading, even struggling readers feel a sense of belonging to and contributing to the group (Chard & Tyler, 2000) Another motivation factor is the gradual growth in confidence as readers become more familiar and comfortable with the text through rehearsal (Rinehart, 1999; Uthman, 2002)

An abundance of research exists emphasize RT as a performance genre with educational benefits Although a few studies focused on examining the RT implementation in an L2 environment (Adams, Farris, Patterson, Santiago, & Secrist,

2007 Santiago, & Secrist, 2007; Liu, 2000; Peng, 2009; Yang, 2006), most discussions focus on its possibilities of enhancing fluency and comprehension, motivation, and reading development; yet, there is minimal research on RT and its effectiveness as an instructional method to influence students‟ oral skill There has been also little research done in elementary ESL classrooms That adds another justification for my present study.

How is Readers Theater Applied and Studied in Vietnam?

In Vietnam, the purpose of reforming teaching and learning of foreign languages in the national system has been stressed in the National Foreign Language 2020 Project According to this project, by 2020 all learners are expected to have the capacity of communicating with others in foreign languages successfully, particularly in English (Ministry of Education and Training, 2008) Focusing on developing students‟ communicative ability, it is necessary that the English class has to break with the familiar routine of working with texts in a mere handful of “traditional” ways, such as asking and answering comprehension questions, translation and vocabulary tests Given the importance of speaking skill, in recent years there have been a lot of changes in the instructional approach of teaching and learning English in Vietnam Different techniques have been applied in English classes in order to create chances for students to use the target language meaningfully and communicatively, which helps enhance students‟ oral production in English as a foreign language

Plenty of research has been done on different strategies to achieve the supportive environment and maximize students‟ learning, resulting in advice, techniques, articles, and resource books for teachers

Drama is one of the strategies that have been used in various educational settings, especially in the context of ESL/ EFL teaching Drama is considered a very effective technique in teaching speaking Hamilton and McLeod describe the relationship between drama and foreign language teaching as follows: “It is hard to imagine anything else that offers to language teachers such a wide variety of types of talks, for example monologues, paired speaking, role-plays, group discussions, reporting, talking in response to other stimuli, problem-solving, developing scenarios, acting out, etc from explaining, complaining, praising, disagreeing to exhorting, apologizing and requesting – there is no language function that drama is not capable of easily encompassing” (Hamilton & McLeod, 1993, p 5) While many English teachers in Vietnam have been quite familiar with some types of drama in class like role-play, simulation, acting play scripts…, they seem to be unfamiliar with Readers Theater Hardly any research has been conducted into the implementation of RT as an instructional technique in the context of teaching and learning English in Vietnam so far This once more justifies the need for a study like what I have done and is presented in this thesis.

Theoretical Support for this Study

Readers Theater is one of many types of drama activities which have been used in teaching language for a long time Having been used to teach foreign languages since middle ages, drama plays an important role to learn target language and culture ( Tüm, 2010) Drama has been view as a way of learning by Psychologists When studying the growth of human cognitively, psychologists found drama provides a sound foundation for development “Lev Vygotsky and Jerome Bruner both see cognitive growth as dependent upon interactive play and upon children imagining themselves acting in worlds that are developmentally a bit above their actual physical and intellectual level Both provide a solid foundation for using drama in the classroom as a way that deepens and enlarges understanding” (Wagner 15)

“Dr Howard Gardner, co-director of Project Zero at Harvard University's Graduate School of Education, has developed a theory of multiple intelligences which suggests that our school systems, which reflect our culture, teach, test, reinforce, and reward primarily two kinds of intelligence verbal and logical-mathematical”

(Dickinson) According to Gardner, students learn in many different ways He states that all individuals possess the skills but the degree of the skills will vary from person to person depending on the combination of the skills He has defined seven multiple intelligences and these multiple intelligences are unique to the individual (Gardner,

1985) If educators teach their students knowing that there are other intelligences besides only verbal and logical, then students will have better chances of learning

Each child is a unique learner and there has been a growing awareness of the need to take into account the different types of „intelligences‟ (Gardner 1993).Readers‟

Theatre relates to the theory of multiple intelligences by connecting with at least five of the intelligences that include bodily-kinesthetic, intrapersonal, musical, verbal- linguistic, and interpersonal (Gardner, 1985) through repeated readings, action and movement, and student interactions Gardner has considered each of these intelligences as equally important to learning “These intelligences provide the foundations for the visual arts, music, dance, and drama, and through these art forms most students will not only find the means for communication and self-expression, but the tools to construct meaning and learn almost any subject effectively” (Dickinson)

Through Gardner‟s theories, there is evidence that RT is an effective means of reaching students with intelligences The intelligences are inherent in creative drama and a Well – designing of using drama has avenues for reaching each student through her favored learning style Using RT in EFL classes has the potential to meet the needs of the learners by providing the teacher with a framework to address different intelligences of the students Susan Stern (in Sam 1990), who looks into drama in second language learning from a psycholinguistic point of view, emphasizes that drama heightens self-esteem, motivation, spontaneity, increases capacity for empathy, and lowers sensitivity to rejection These tremendous benefits of drama facilitate communication and provide an appropriate psycholinguistic climate for language learning by addressing multiple intelligences of the students

Another theory related to using drama in teaching is constructive theory The constructivist theory has had the greatest impact on instruction and curriculum design because it seems to be the most encouraging to integration into current educational approaches (Jones & Brader-Araje, 2002) At the heart of constructivism is the idea that learning is neither passive nor a copying process Rather, it is a process of active participation (Schifter &Simon, 1990) Constructivists believe that knowledge construction takes place when new knowledge is actively assimilated and accommodated into existing knowledge (Piaget 1967) The term “constructivism” is most commonly used to refer to the theory that stems from this knowledge about learning Understanding, at any given time, is organized in the network of existing knowledge within the learner‟s mind (Schifter & Simon, 1990) One theoretical viewpoint about modern educational Drama emerges from the ideas of educators such as Rousseau, Montessori, Bruner, and Dewey They say that learning happens through active participation, or as Dewey states "learning by doing” (Courtney 1) Drama is a form of “learning by doing.” Dewey also stressed the importance of the imagination

He called imagination the “gateway through which meanings are derived from past experiences that are carried into the present” (Iannone 307) The curriculum should integrate the imagination or aesthetic world with the cognitive world of the student

“John Dewey‟s, „learning by doing‟ theory shaped The progressive era in education”

METHODOLOGY

Research Setting

This research was carried out during the second course of a Movers class at an English center in Yen Bai in 2017 This research involved a class of 16 primary students who came from grade 4 of different primary schools in Yen Bai city The students enrolled at Movers level at the age of 10 and all of them had learnt English for two years at Starter level and six months of the first Movers course This research took place when students were in the second course of the Movers level

In this English center, there are English classes for students at any ages The English courses designed for kids follow the YLE framework of Cambridge from Pre- starters level to Flyers level The classes meet two times a week and each lesson lasts

Research Materials

According to Ludolph (2013), literature used to make a good RT script work if it has a strong line, conflict, plot, action, humor, and interesting characters The script used also contains dialogues and is not filled with lots of description/descriptive passages Choosing materials which are suitable to students‟ level of English is an important step which determines the success of the RT activity

In this study, the materials used in speaking were taken from Reading A-Z website (https://www.readinga-z.com) Reading A-Z is popular to educators for its extensive collections of graded reading resources with more than 2,000 books at 29 levels of reading difficulty to choose from Because the stories on this page are put into the categories according to the age of readers, it is not so difficult for the researcher to choose books with appropriate content for her students

Considering the English level of the participants, the topics of the stories which must be close to real life situations and interest to young learners, the researcher used two stories named “Doctor Jen” and “Four friends” written by Cheryl Ryan for two cycles of the action research.

Data Collection Techniques and Instruments

The data collection techniques are decided on the basis of the research questions mentioned in the Introduction In this classroom action research, the data which are collected by observations, questionnaires and tests are explained as follows:

The data in the form of qualitative method were collected from the observations done by the teacher during the teaching-learning process about the whole activities and the students‟ behavior According to Burns (2010), observing and describing have a key role to play in action research Most of the observation will have a focus; it is carried out systematically with the clear intention of understanding the students This includes their behavior and learning, such as skills and knowledge, interests and thought processes, social interactions and attitude to learning “It involves note taking, probably using a particular recording method and can be diagnostic tool as it provides information for reflection, analysis and discussion.” (Duncan & Lockwood, 2008, pp

46-47) The data of observation were recorded in the form of field-notes Besides that, the video record was used by the researcher to supplement the field note data, because the notes alone could not record all of the things that happened during the classroom time

Teacher‟s field-note observations and video tape were used to record the process of teaching and learning in classroom to see if the application of RT could improve the students‟ speaking skill and what should be noticed when using RT technique in speaking lessons

A questionnaire survey was distributed among the students at the end of the process in order to explicitly elicit the students‟ opinion about Readers Theater implementation Dornyei (2001) notes that through questionnaires a researcher can obtain three types of information: factual or demographic (who the participants are and their background/experiences); behavioral (what they do or did in the past); attitudinal (attitudes, opinions, beliefs, interests and values) Questionnaire survey technique is considered a very effective tool which enables researchers to gather large scale numerical data over a short period of time In this particular study, the researcher used this method to collect students‟ responses of Readers Theater technique This section included 8 Likert-type (summated rating scale) items Because the participants were 10 years old students, the five-scale Likert scale seemed not to be suitable as stated by Royeen (1985): The children found the 5-item response format too confusing, and they were confused by the rather abstract notion of how much the item was liked by them The researcher decided to choose an adapted form of Likert scaling with 3-point scale and smiley face elements alongside the text of response options to help respondents process the categories Participants were asked to rate each statement at levels of 1 (agree); 2 (neither agree or disagree); 3 (disagree) (see Annex D) The questionnaires were written in Vietnamese to ensure that the students understood the questions and to make it easier for them to respond

According to Brown and Abeywickrama (2004), a test can be defined as a method of measuring a person‟s ability, knowledge, or performance in a given domain In this research, the researcher conducted a pre-test in the beginning of the teaching learning process and a post-test at the end of each cycle The speaking scores of the test within each process were analyzed to see the degree of the student‟s speaking proficiency

The tests were in form of storytelling in which students were asked to tell a story based on the pictures given This type of test is one of the tasks students had to do in the final test of the Movers course There were three tests in total, one pre-test and two post-tests

In this research, the students‟ performance tests were scored by using the speaking rubric proposed by Gall, Borg, and Gall (2003, p 571) (see Annex C) It was an assessment rubric test consisting of four aspects They were fluency, accuracy, vocabulary, and pronunciation Each aspect was scored 1 to 10 in which every score had different indicators: the higher the score is, the more complicated the indicators will be and vice versa.

Data Analyses

Qualitatively, all the observation data collected were organized and classified the researcher followed the framework proposed by Burns (2010) This framework consists of five stages:

In this stage, the field notes data and any ongoing reflections were gathered The initial and/or revised questions about the research process were reviewed in order to examine the changes occurring in the two cycles

The data gathered were then coded into categories

Once the coding was complete, the categories or patterns were compared across different sets of data to review and highlight contradictions and differences

In this stage, more abstract „big picture‟ concepts of what had been found were built and any „personal theories‟ about the meaning or importance of the research were refined

This was the final stage where the research was presented It was important to consider how the whole „story of the research‟ from the beginning to the end was going to be organized

The researcher observed the process of RT implementation in classroom based on the activities performed by both the teacher and the students in five stages of realizing RT (reading, writing the script, rehearing, performing, feedback) The observation notes were classified according to the stages of RT application The data from video tapes were used to supplement the writing notes

Quantitatively, the responses from the questionnaires were rated as to frequency and tabulated into percentages The researcher rounded off the percentages so that they do not always reflect 100% The questionnaire was used to see students‟ response toward the process of teaching and learning using RT

The students‟ scores in pre-test and post-tests were compared to see the improvements of the students‟ speaking skill The mean of the pre-test and the post- tests can be calculated with the formulas as follows:

In which: x = means of pre-test scores y = means of post-test scores

And a qualitative analysis is employed „to gain a concise numerical picture of the issues; to characterize or describe a set of numbers; to show numbers succinctly in terms of averages, frequencies, percentages; to show how numbers disperse or vary around a central point‟ (Burns, 2010, p 118).

Research Procedure

Regarding the aims of solving students‟ problem in learning speaking skill and improving their speaking competence, this research was undertaken on the basis of a classroom action research design

There are various definitions of action research stated by different experts

Kemmis (1993) gives the definition of action research as follows: Action research is a form of self-reflective inquiry undertaken by participators in a social situation (including education) in order to improve the rationality and justice of (a) their own social or educational practice, (b) their understanding of these practices and (c) the situation in which practices are carried out Action research, as defined by McKay

(2006) is both „action‟, in that it seeks to bring about a change, and „research‟, in that data are collected and analyzed According to Pine (Pine, 2008, p 30), classroom action research is a process of concurrently inquiring about problems and taking actions to solve them It is a sustained, intentional, recursive, and dynamic process of inquiry in which the teacher takes an action purposefully and ethically in specific classroom contexts to improve teaching/learning It provides practitioners with new knowledge and understanding about how to improve educational practices or resolve significant problems in classrooms and schools (Mills, 2011; Stringer, 2008)

Burns (1999) states that classroom action research has some characteristics:

1 Action research is contextual, small-scale and localized It identifies and investigates within a specific situation

2 It is evaluative and reflective as it aims to bring about change and improvement in practice

3 It is perspiratory as it provides for collaborative investigation by team colleagues, practitioners, and researchers

4 Change in practices is based on the collection of information or data which provide the impetus of change

Although teachers often work collaboratively on action research projects, this type of research can also be done by an individual teacher working alone (Ferrance, 2000; McKay, 2006) Burns (2012) state the questions asked by the people doing action research are different from traditional research questions If traditional research questions ask about what other people doing, an action research asks about what the researcher do In an action research, the researcher plays dual roles Teacher can be either active participant (Frankel & Wallen, 2012)

The model of action research presented by Kemmis and McTaggart (2005) is one of the most widely used ones, hence, this research implemented their model as a way in conducting an action research study The cycle of a classroom action research is illustrated in Figure 2

Figure 1:Cyclical Action Research Model by Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988 (in Burns,

By adapting that model, Burns & Kurtoglu-Hooton (2014) consider the dynamic process through a spiral of activities that can be implemented flexibly as the research progresses

 Plan: The planning stage involves refining the researchers‟ ideas about what to investigate in their classroom, and if possible developing some questions they would like to answer Then, it is possible to develop teaching strategies or activities to try out

 Act: This stage involves acting on the researchers‟ plans and experimenting with new approaches or activities

 Observe: In this stage, the researchers collect information, or data, on what is happening as a result of implementing their plans

 Reflect: This part of the process occurs from the time the research begins as then researchers reflect more systematically than usual on what effect the research is having However, it is also important to identify the overall messages coming from the research, which help the researchers to articulate their personal teaching philosophies or theories about practice

This research applied action research design because of some considerations

First, the research was conducted in an attempt to solve the problems posed by students in the process of learning speaking skill Secondly, this research was done in a cyclical process, and the practitioner (researcher) had flexibility to make change from one cycle to the next In addition, this research was done in the context of a classroom with a small group of students, so using action research design is suitable

As a researcher, the writer followed two reflective cycles consisting of four processes including: planning, action, observation, and reflection Planning refers to determining the subject, steps of action, and instruments used for collecting data

Action refers to what the researcher would do in the classroom and how the class would be managed based on the previous lesson plan Observation refers to the activity to observe the classroom situation and to learn of the student‟s behaviors during the process of teaching learning in order to understand the students‟ problem and improvement during the action given Reflection refers to the activity where the researcher can decide whether the study will be continued or stopped

2.5.1 The Situation Prior to the Research

In conducting the research, the researcher worked collaboratively with the English teacher of the Movers class at the English center Before conducting the research, the researcher discussed and shared the Action Research knowledge with the teacher The teacher was interested in it since she wanted to know the students‟ improvement through the research

The researcher conducted observation and some interviews to identify the problems in the English teaching and learning processes at the Movers class Acting as the observer, the writer observed the students‟ performance in class and see how good their speaking competence is during the teaching and learning process done by the English teacher During the observation, the researcher found that students had problems in their speaking Some students spoke with wrong pronunciation, they were not fluent when using English; the students‟ vocabulary was still low, they got difficulties in expressing their ideas Some others were better, but they were not confident when using English to communicate The classroom atmosphere was not lively, either Many students were busy talking to their friends; the others kept silent or spoke Vietnamese when being asked Most of them were bored and were not active in the speaking class By interviewing students, the researcher found out that most of the students felt that speaking English was difficult, and they were not motivated in speaking lessons

Afterwards, the researcher held a pre-test in which the students were asked to tell a story based on the pictures given and practice it in front of the class This pre-test was to measure how well their speaking ability was The mean score of the test was 5.47 from range 1-10

After the problems were identified, a pre-requisite analysis was carried out in order to identify the cause-and-effect relationships among those problems The analysis was conducted by having a discussion with the teacher as the collaborator

Considering the problems, the researcher believed that the possible reasons underlying the problems were the students‟ shortage of speaking practice, the lack of meaningful contexts for students to practice speaking and the limitation in the speaking activities used in speaking class The situation prior to the research can be seen in the table below:

Table 1:Situation Prior to the Research

 The students‟ speaking proficiency was still low

 Students had low motivation to speak in English

The students’ speaking proficiency was still low

 rarely answered questions given by the teacher orally

 spoke with a lot of pauses

 difficulties to find the appropriate words to create sentences or expressions

 difficulties to recognize the words and grammar used

Students had low motivation to speak in English

 Students kept silent when being required to do the speaking tasks

 Students prefer using Vietnamese to answer the teacher‟s questions

 Some students did not concentrate on the lesson, they were busy chatting to their friends

 Students were not confident to speak out their answers

Causes  Low mastery of grammar and vocabulary

 Limited time and speaking practice

 The speaking activities were boring

 The teaching – learning activities were too tense and nerve- racing

 No meaningful contexts for students to practice speaking

After knowing the situation prior to the research, the researcher implemented the action with the collaborator by teaching the students using RT and the English teacher observed the class The teacher also helped in preparing and collecting the materials The classroom action research covered two cycles Each cycle consisted of five steps which included: 1) planning the action; 2) implementing the action; 3) observing the action; 4) reflecting the observation result; and 5) revising the plan

Every cycle was held in four meetings, and every meeting lasted 45 minutes The more detailed descriptions of the implementation is given in the following section

2.5.2.1 Report of Cycle I i) Planning of Cycle I

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

Readers Theater and the Improvement of Students‟ Speaking

From the observation, improvement of students‟ speaking can be seen in all stages of RT application

Reading stage was the preliminary activity in which students worked on the text together to get background knowledge concerning a play In the reading stage of both cycles in this research, most students read the story carefully when they were given the text While reading the text, several lines with unfamiliar vocabularies encouraged students to check the meaning by asking their friends or consult to the teacher This stage contributed to the students‟ acquisition of vocabulary Also, students were encouraged to ask and speak up In the reading stage of cycle I, most students‟ questions about the vocabulary were in Vietnamese In cycle II, after students were provided with some input of classroom English and required to use English in class, students asked questions in English and the teacher also tried to explain the difficult words by using simple English or making gestures As a result, students became more confident when they could make questions in English This situation was captured in the video and field notes

In the stage of writing scripts, students worked in groups, discussed and wrote the scripts from the story given By discussing to decide the lines of each character, students understood the story deeper and became familiar with the text genre

Students‟ comprehension of the context where the characters‟ dialogs appeared gave students chance to learn the speaking language meaningfully When writing the script, students also had to work with grammar in order to put the text into the dialogs This enhanced students‟ awareness of using grammar The examples of these moments were captured when they changed the subject from the third person to the first person in the script of Cycle 1

My sister is sick She has a fever

Story 1: Doctor Jen (see Annex F)

In cycle II, when the teacher corrected the mistakes form students‟ scripts in front of the whole class, students found out their mistakes and learned from them This finding is in line with Patrick (2008) when he said „In creating RT scripts, students increase their knowledge of language structure (vocabulary, syntax and meaning), language use (forms and functions of language use) and the metalinguistic awareness‟

In the rehearsal stage, students practiced reading their lines to prepare for their performance; they worked with word pronunciation, intonation, as well as the gestures, the body language, and the face mimic When rehearsing, students were free to express their characters, and they practiced reading their lines again and again to gain fluency Subconsciously, some words and lines were automatically memorized after several times of repetition By rehearsing, students could gradually overcome their fear of speaking In the rehearsal stage of cycle II when the teacher spent time helping the weaker students in class, students became more confident in their spoken English In addition, it was captured by the observation that students tried to read their lines in different ways because they really wanted to express their roles better In this way, student worked with intonation, stress and rhythm of the language This also gave students chance to use words and expressions that were relevant to their daily contexts For example, in the first cycle, students tried to express their health matters by softening their voice And when writing and oral rehearsal go together, it

„simultaneously provides training in the ability to communicate meaningfully, one of the most important aims of language learning‟ (Drew, 2013, p 1)

In the performing stage, students tried to use their voices, facial expressions, and gestures to portray the characters Every member of the group tried to do the best for his/ her group in order to have a good performance This stage gave students opportunities to stand in front of their classmates and perform the script dialogue

Students all had chance to be on the stage, even very shy students This helped students overcome the fear of speaking in front of the others During the performance stage, students watched while other students were playing, the audience was asked to listen and respect In the first cycle, some students were still shy and performed with very soft voice; in the second cycle, most students were confident to speak out their lines Although there were still some mistakes, students seemed to be happy when they had accomplished their group performance successfully The practice in the performance stage became authentic because it was for real audience Students were observed performing with engagement Farabi, Hassanvand, and Gorjian (2017, p 23) proved that „Oral presentation activities are authentic and relevant of learners‟ interest, they may overcome their fear of speaking Secondly, it can promote the speaking skill too.‟

In the evaluation stage, students listened to the researcher‟s feedback Students were also encouraged to give feedback to their friends‟ performance In cycle I, some students said that they could not hear their friends‟ voice because they spoke so softly

Students were captured being involved in watching others‟ performance and expressing opinions about the presentation In cycle II students were asked to evaluate their own performance be using self-evaluation checklist Some students said that they were not satisfied with their performance and they wanted to make it again

This proved that students‟ motivation in joining the speaking activity did increase It is in this sense, Davies (1990, p 97) stated that „dramatic activities also improve students' maturity and motivation.‟

3.1.2 Improvement of Speaking through Tests

The pre-test was administered before the application of RT; on the other hand, post-test 1 and post-test 2 were carried out at the end of cycle I and cycle II As mentioned in the Methodology chapter, the students‟ performance tests were scored by using the speaking rubric proposed by Gall et al (2003, p 571) which was an assessment rubric test consisting of four features including: fluency, accuracy, vocabulary, and pronunciation The results of students‟ speaking tests were compared to find out if there was any improvement of students‟ speaking skill after the process of using RT in teaching and learning Both the research and English teacher gave their assessments in the tests

In the pre-test, some students were hesitant to speak as they were not confident and felt afraid to make mistakes Their dictions were also limited They got mistakes in pronouncing utterances and used grammar incorrectly Besides, their utterances did not have strong cohesion

Through the implementation of RT, the students‟ speaking abilities were improved The improvements were revealed from the result of the students‟ performances in post-tests 1 and 2 In the post-tests, their grammatical mistakes were reduced and their pronunciation got better Their vocabulary was also varied The students were more confident and fluent in delivering the utterances The result of the test is presented below

Table 2: Scores of pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2

The difference in scores between the pre-test and post-test 1 was presented in the following chart

Chart 1: Comparison between the Average Scores of Students’ Pre-test and Post-test 1, post-test 2 in Terms of Fluency, Accuracy, Pronunciation, and

The chart above shows that changes took place in all four aspects of students‟ speaking skill It can be seen that the average scores of each aspect in post-test 1 were higher than those in the pre-test and similarly, post-test 2 average scores were also higher than those in post-test 1 In other words, there were increases in students‟ fluency, accuracy, pronunciation, and vocabulary mastery through the whole process The mean score of the fluency and pronunciation aspect gained by the students from the pre-test to post-test 2 is 1.13 and 1.0 respectively These mean scores are slightly higher than those of accuracy and vocabulary aspects In accuracy aspect, the mean score obtained is 0.82 while in terms of vocabulary the mean score gained is 0.96 As Burns (2010) stated about the validity of this descriptive statistics, they „offer a neat and tidy way of summarizing quantitative data… They are an excellent way of reporting on a particular group of learners, for example So, descriptive statistics fit in well with the local and specific characteristics of action research‟.

Students‟ Responses toward the Implementation of Readers Theater in

The answer to research question No 2 was based on the result of the questionnaire survey The answers obtained from questionnaire would strengthen the findings from the observation 16 students completed the questionnaires We rated the

Fluency Pronunciation Accuracy Vocabulary pre-test post-test 1 post-test2 responses as to frequency and tabulated them into percentages which were rounded off so that they do not always reflect 100%

Table 2: Survey on Readers Theater

Statement disagree Neither agree or disagree agree

2 The lesson is more fun with RT 12.5% 6.2.% 81.2.%

3 I like working with my friends in writing and performing the scripts

5 I am more confident using English through RT

6 I prefer to learn English on my own than in a group

7 After watching my friend performance,

I want to improve my English

8 I learn about group communication after watching other groups‟ performance

In response to whether students have positive experiences with RT, 62.5 % agreed that they enjoy RT A majority of 81.2% agree that the lesson was more interesting with RT About 75% of students agreed that they enjoyed working with their friends in writing and performing the scripts This shows that a majority of students in the class had no difficulty in accepting RT

Students also had positive response on the use of RT as a tool to help them improve their pronunciation and gain confidence 81.2 % believed that they were better at reading words and 62,5 % agreed they were more confident using English through RT

It is interesting to note that most students learned effectively when working collaboratively in group Only 25% indicated that they preferred to learn English on their own rather than in a group and most students were motivated to improve their English after watching their friends‟ performance (62.5% agreed) In addition, watching other groups‟ performance helped students learn how to work in group better with 68.7% saying they learned about group communication after watching their friends‟ performance

To conclude, students experienced RT positively from several aspects The students‟ attitudes toward RT proved that RT has helped them to be more active in using the language This finding agrees with Drew‟s (2013, p 7) conclusion that „The pupils were enthusiastic about experiencing RT in this way; they appreciated being active, experiencing English in a challenging and meaningful way.‟

Some Cautions Concerning Readers Theater Application in Speaking Classes

From the data collected through the whole process of RT application in speaking lessons, it was found that in order to carry out RT successfully in the classroom, the teacher should pay attention to several factors as follows:

(i) The reading material should be chosen very carefully As could be seen from the 2 cycles of innovation that reading was the initial stage in which students‟ comprehension of the story could decide the success of the other stages Appropriate stories can help student create scripted texts for RT materials A connection between the text and the students made it easier for students to interpret the script deeply and have little difficulty in the following RT stage It is also one of valuable literacy experiences This is in line with Drew and Pedersen‟s (2010, p 15) finding that besides the successful implementation of RT, „the choice of text is an important issue.‟

(ii) Sufficient experience in conducting group activity is necessary RT requires students to work within groups most of the time Therefore, the teacher‟s role was shown in managing group activities during RT implementation At the beginning of the group working process, the teacher was the one who decided the group members and some students were not satisfied when they were put in the group without their favorite partners In order that they could cooperate with all, the teacher had to explain her opinion about appropriate partners to work In the time while the groups were working on script writing, assigning members‟ roles, rehearsing and performing the scripts, the role of the teacher in managing groups was crucial Drew and Pedersen (2010) also stated that „the teacher plays a crucial role in successfully implementing a RT project in the classroom.‟

(iii) Maximal use of English in the whole process of RT implementation can benefit students‟ speaking ability; therefore, the teacher should create a classroom environment that requires students to use English as much as possible throughout the process There are so many discussions in all stages of RT, which contribute to the development of students‟ speaking skill if English is spoken most of the time In cycle

I, the teacher did not set the requirement of using English in class and she also had to translate her instructions into Vietnamese sometimes, so most of the language in the discussions was in Vietnamese In the second cycle, when the teacher set some rules of using English in class, students used more English in class On the other hand, the teacher also tried to use some simple classroom instructions and gestures to communicate with students In this way, the English classroom environment was more alive

(iv) The teacher‟s scaffolding, especially, with weaker learners is necessary for almost every stage of RT Students need help with the vocabulary at the reading stage In writing scripts, students need the teacher to correct their grammar and spelling mistakes In the rehearsing stage, the teacher serves as a model when students encounter any problems with pronunciation, tone, stress etc (Allington, 1983; Rasinski, 2006)

(v) Allowing students sufficient time to do each activity can make them feel relaxed and comfortable in doing RT implementation, especially when they performed in front of the class

(vi) Ensure that every student is involved in the activities and can contribute to the success of the activity Teacher may find students reluctant to participate and perform in front of their classmates As can be seen from the observation, some students did not concentrate on the reading activity in cycle 1 and they did not understand the story well, but in cycle 2, when the teacher tried different ways to attract their attention, they all understood the story and could work out the scripts better Much encouragement and after several rehearsals in script reading, students will gradually learn to overcome their fear of speaking Teachers may also need to provide students more time and guidance to complete their scripts

This part presents the recapitulation, limitations of the study and recommendations for future studies It summarizes the findings and arguments in the discussion of the preceding chapters It also depicts the pedagogic implications.

Recapitulation

There are three major conclusions that can be generated from the related research questions acknowledged in the preceding chapter The first research question is aimed at investigating how RT improves students‟ speaking skill The second question is students‟ response on the implementation of

RT in speaking classes they had undertaken Responses to the two questions help generate cautions on what should be done and what should be avoided in applying RT

Based on the previous data and discussions, the following conclusions can be drawn

First, this study has shown that RT in teaching speaking is one of the alternatives that can be implemented by EFL teachers to improve speaking activities

The aspects in RT which improve speaking skill are from the RT stages RT implementation is feasible and successful in helping students to get involved in speaking activities, acquire vocabulary and grammar in context, practice pronunciation, intonation, as well as gestures, body language Students also learn to be more confident and have collective responsibility with others through each stage of

Besides the improvement of speaking mentioned above, RT may well be an interesting activity in speaking class when all students are engaged in RT activities actively Students may undergo positive experience in joining RT and most of them agree that RT gives more fun to the English lessons and may motivate them to learn English

Regarding the implementation of RT in this research, some cautions are suggested to ensure the success of RT application in class, namely: teachers should be careful in choosing materials, have sufficient experience in managing groups, allocate reasonable time for each stage of RT, maximize English speaking time in class and keep students‟ attention in the whole process of applying RT

The research then concludes that RT is a valuable teaching method to be applied to improve speaking skill in particular and in language learning in general.

Implications

These study findings shed light on the relevant of literatures and offer a number of both theoretical and practical implications From theoretical perspective, this present study provides further understanding of RT Employing a mixed method approach to study RT is feasible and action research is suitable to test the effectiveness of RT in speaking classroom

From practical perspective, the findings of this study could suggest a number of implications For EFL students, implementing RT can boost students‟ confidence to speak English, make teaching and learning activities fun and more entertaining; help the students feel relaxed and comfortable in doing teaching and learning activities; provide students with various opportunities to partake in plenty of authentic outputs: acting various roles, exploring social conventions of real situations; and sharpen communicative strategies such as eliciting opinions, feedback, and questioning

For EFL teachers, RT can provide another fruitful choice for English speaking programs in Yen Bai and elsewhere EFL teachers can implement RT into the local contexts without much effort but to apply the tested model from this study ELF teachers may also gradually apply the findings from this study into teaching reading, writing and listening Teachers also should prepare themselves and students before implementing RT as well as pay more attention to less-proficient students, modeling groups and group managing Last but not least, the better timing to conduct RT, the higher the effectiveness that RT may impose.

Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research

The present study is limited when the findings are based mostly on the analysis of qualitative data, which depends on the interpretation of the author, i.e the findings may be not tenable, exhaustive, and arbitrary One more limitation of the study is the small data sample in this study (16 students), which may not be enough to draw a holistic picture of RT Since the number of students in class was relatively small, the teacher was able to monitor each individual‟s progress and give regular feedback to each member of the group Class size therefore becomes a pertinent issue Involving more students may strengthen the present findings In addition to this, the study time is also limited The result from a short period of time may affect the strength of the research This indicates that RT in teaching speaking requires more time for its implementation so that the results will be more convincing

To future researchers, it is suggested that more time should be spent on quantitative research and then the findings may be validated, an enlargement of data sample is also suggested to generalize the findings Lastly, further research could be conducted to test the effectiveness of RT to improve reading, writing, and listening in the local contexts

Adams, T., Farris, W., Patterson, R., Santiago, C., & Secrist, J (2007) The effect of reader’s theater on the comprehension and fluency of Spanish language learners whose first language is English: A short case study in the San Bernardino City Unified School District (Master),

Unified School, San Bernardino City Retrieved from http://www.emurillo.org/Classes/Class2/documents/SpanishLanguageAcquisition.doc Allington, R L (1983) Fluency: The neglected reading goal The Reading Teacher, 36(6), 556-561

Berlinger, M R (2000) Encouraging English expression through script-based improvisations The

Black, A., & Stave, A M (2007) A Comprehensive Guide to Readers Theatre: Enhancing Fluency and Comprehension in Middle School and Beyond New York: International Reading

Brown, H D., & Abeywickrama, P (2004) Language assessment: Principles and Classroom

Practices White Plains, New York: Pearson Education

Brown, H D., & Lee, H (2015) Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language

Burkart, G., & Sheppard, K (2004) Content ESL across the USA: A Training Packet A Descriptive

Study of Content ESL Practices National Clearinghouse for English Acquisition Retrieved from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/cal/contentesl/

Burns, A (1999) Collaborative action research for English language teachers Cambridge:

Burns, A (2010) Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners

Burns, A., & Joyce, H (1997) Focus on Speaking North Ryde, New South Wales: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research

Burns, A., & Kurtoglu-Hooton, N (2014) Implementing action research in the modern language classroom Scottish Language Review, 1(27), 21-28

Burns, C., & Goh, C (2012) Teaching speaking: A holistic approach Cambridge, New York:

Buzzeo, T (2006) Reader‟s Theater, Collaboration, and You, the Library Literacy Partner

Retrieved from http://wtuccfd.wikispaces.com/file/view/ReadersTheater+collaboration+and+you+the+library +literacy+partmer.pdf

Casey, S., & Chamberlain, R (2006) Bringing reading alive through readers‟ theater Illinois Reading

Chan, A., & Chan, S (2009) Promoting assessment for learning through Readers Theater IATEFL

Young Language Learner and Teenage Special Interest Group, 2(09), 40-50

Chaney, A L., & Burk, T L (1998) Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8 Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Chard, B.-J., & Tyler, D J (2000) Focus on Inclusion: Using Readers Theatre to foster fluency in struggling readers: A twist on the repeated reading strategy Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(2), 163-168

Courtney, Richard Dramatic Curriculum London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., 1980

Davies, P (1990) The use of drama in English language teaching TESL Canada Journal, 8(1), 87-

Dửrnyei, Z (2001) Motivation strategies in the language classroom Cambridge, New York,

Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paolo: Cambridge University Press

Dougill, J (1987) Drama Activities for Language Learners Esential Language Teaching Series

Drew, I (2013) Linking Readers Theater to CLIL in foreign language education Nordic Journal of

Drew, I., & Pedersen, R R (2010) Readers Theatre: A different approach to English for struggling readers Acta Didactica Norge, 4(1), 1-18

Duncan, J., & Lockwood, M (2008) Learning through play: A work-based approach for the early years professional London, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic

Farabi, M., Hassanvand, S., & Gorjian, B (2017) Using Guided Oral Presentation in Teaching

English Language Learners‟ Speaking Skills Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 3(1), 17-24

Ferrance, E (2000) Action research Retrieved from http://www.alliance.brown.edu/pubs/ themes_ed/act_research.pdf Florez, M C (1998) Improving adult ESL learners‟ pronunciation skills Retrieved from https://www.ericdigests.org/1999-4/adult.htm Flynn, R M (2004) Curriculum‐based Readers Theatre: Setting the Stage for Reading and Retention

Frankel, J R., & Wallen, N E (2012) How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education New

York: The McGraw Hill Company

Gall, M D., Borg, W R., & Gall, J P (2003) Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.)

Gardner, H 1985 Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences New York: Basic Books

Hamilton, J., & McLeod, A (1993) Drama in the Languages Classroom Pathfinder 19 A CILT Series for Language Teachers London: ERIC

Hill, S (1990) Readers Theater: Performing the text Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing

Horwitz, E K (1986) Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign language anxiety scale TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 559-562

Hoyt, L (1992) Many ways of knowing: Using drama, oral interactions, and the visual arts to enhance reading comprehension The Reading Teacher, 45(8), 580-584

Huang, K L (2006) Research of Teaching Chinese Language with Readers Theater for Six Grade

Elementary School Students (Master Unpublished), National Tainan University, Tainan

Iannone, Ron “Imagination: The missing link in curriculum and teaching.” Education V.122, n 2 2001: 307-309.Jensen, Eric Teaching with the Brain in Mind Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1998

Johns, A M (1981) Necessary English: A faculty survey TESOL Quarterly, 15(1), 51-57

Jordan, S., & Harrell, K (2000) Readers Theater: A creative tool for strengthening skills of emergent readers Kindergarten Education: Theory, Research and Practice, 5(5), 73-80

Jones, M G & Brader-Araje, L (2002) The impact of constructivism on education: Language,

Discourse, and Meaning American Communication Journal, 5, (3)

Kelleher, M E (1997) Readers‟ Theater and metacognition The New England Reading Association

Kemmis, S (1993) Action Research and Social Movement: A Challenge for Policy Research

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R (2005) Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the

Public Sphere In N K Denzin & Y S Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp 271-330) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd

Latrobe, K (1996) Encouraging Reading & Writing Through Readers Theatre Emergency Librarian,

Lee, Y H (2010) A Case Study of Readers Theater Based on Adapted Literary Works in an

Elementary Bilingual Class (Master), National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung

Liu, J (2000) The power of readers theater: From reading to writing ELT journal, 54(4), 354-361

Ludolph, M (2013) Readers Theater Education Resource Guide Retrieved from http://thencbla.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Readers-Theater-Education-Resource- Guide.pdf

Luoma, S (2004) Assessing Speaking New York: Cambridge University Press

Martinez, M., Roser, N L., & Strecker, S (1998) " I never thought I could be a star": A Readers

Theatre ticket to fluency The Reading Teacher, 52(4), 326-334

McAndrews, S (2004) Reader‟s Theater: A dramatic interpretation of text Retrieved from http://www.midtesol.org/Newsletter/2004Fall-Readers.htm McKay, M E (2008) Readers theatre - Take another look - It‟s more than fluency instruction

McKay, S L (2006) Researching second language classrooms Mahwah, New Jersey, London:

Miccoli, L (2003) English through drama for oral skills development ELT journal, 57(2), 122-129

Millin, S K., & Rinehart, S D (1999) Some of the benefits of readers theater participation for second‐grade title I students Literacy Research and Instruction, 39(1), 71-88

Mills, G E (2011) Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (4th ed.) Boston: Pearson

Nathan, R G., & Stanovich, K E (1991) The causes and consequences of differences in reading fluency Theory into practice, 30(3), 176-184

Neelands, J (1992) Learning through imagined experience London: Hodder & Stoughton

Nunan, D (1999) Second Language Teaching & Learning Boston: Heinle & CENGAGE Learning

Nunan, D (2003) Practical English language teaching New York: McGraw-Hill

Patrick, N C L (2008) The Impact of Readers Theater (RT) in the EFL Classroom Polyglossia,

Peebles, J L (2007) Incorporating movement with fluency instruction: A motivation for struggling readers The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 578-581

Peng, S W (2009) The effect of Readers Theater on English reading ability of fourth graders in an elementary school in Taiwan (Master Unpublished), National Yunlin University of Science

Pine, G J (2008) Teacher action research: Building knowledge democracies Los Angeles, London,

New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage

Prochazka, A (2007) Drama in Modern Language Teaching (Vol 15) Frankfurt: Wien

Rasinski, T (2006) Reading fluency instruction: Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity, and prosody The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 704-706

Richards, J., & Renandya, W (2002) Teaching Speaking In J C Richards & W A Renandya

(Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp 201-233)

Rinehart, S D (1999) „Don‟t think for a minute that I‟m getting up there‟: Opportunities for Readers

Theater in a tutorial for children with reading problems Reading Psychology, 20(1), 71-89

Rivers, W M (2002) Interactive Language Teaching Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid:

Royeen, C B (1985) Adaptation of Likert scaling for use with children The Occupational Therapy

Journal of Research, 5(1), 59-69 doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/153944928500500104

Samuels, S J (1997) The method of repeated readings The Reading Teacher, 50(5), 376-381

Sato, K (2003) Improving Our Students' Speaking Skills: Using Selective Error Correction and

Group Work To Reduce Anxiety and Encourage Real Communication ERIC Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED475518.pdf

Schifter, D., & Simon, M A (1990) Assessing teachers‟ development of a constructivist view of mathematics learning University Park: Pennsylvania State University, Department of Curriculum and Instruction

Shepard, A (2004) Readers on Stage: Resources for Reader's Theater (or Readers Theatre), with

Tips, Play Scripts, and Worksheets: Shepard Publications

Shepard, A (2006) What is Readers Theater? Retrieved from http://www.aaronshep.com/rt/RTE.html Sloyer, S (1982) Readers Theatre: Story Dramatization in the Classroom The United States of

America: ERIC/The National Council of Teachers of English

Speaking (2018) Oxford: Oxford University Press

Stringer, E T (2008) Action research in education (2nd ed.) New Jersey: Pearson

Styles, M., & Dunn, J (1989) Mission to hell In M Styles (Ed.), Collaboration and writing (pp 9-

Thornbury, S (2011) How to Teach Speaking Harlow: Longman

Tian, S P., & Wu, N T (2012) Readers Theater as a ticket to more than reading fluency A study of student interaction and perception Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences - National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 8(2), 97-118

Trousdale, A M., & Harris, V J (1993) Missing links in literary response: Group interpretation of literature Children's Literature in Education, 24(3), 195-207

Tỹm, G (no date) Tỹrkỗenin Yabancı Dil Olarak ệğretiminde Drama Tekniğinin Rolỹ Retrieved on june 3, 2012 from http://www.turkcede.org/yabancilara-turkce-ogretimi/579-turkcenin-yabanci-dil- olarakogretiminde-drama-tekniginin-rolu.htm

Uthman, L E (2002) Readers‟ theatre: An approach to reading with more than a touch of drama

Walker, A M (1998) Newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism

Worthy, J., & Prater, K (2002) The Intermediate Grades: "I Thought about It All Night": Readers

Theatre for Reading Fluency and Motivation The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 294-297

Wagner, Betty Jane Dorothy Heathcote, Drama As A Learning Medium

Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1976.Educational Drama and Language Arts:

What Research Shows.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1998

Yang, Y L (2006) A study of oral reading fl uency: The implementation of Readers Theater in an

EFL elementary school (Master Unpublised), National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan, Chung Cheng

Zhang, S (2009) The role of input, interaction and output in the development of oral fluency English

Field note 4: Third meeting of cycle 1 (October 25 th 2018) R: Researcher

ET: English Teacher Ss: students

The R gave each student a copy of their script, then asked students to assign the roles in each group Ss started working in groups Some Ss made noise in their group, because they wanted to take their favorite role Ss argued in Vietnamese to have the role they want The R then had to come to each group and helped Ss assign the roles

The R asked Ss to underline their line in the scripts and practice reading the lines

Some Ss could not find their lines, they asked their fiends Some Ss did not concentrate on the script, they were chatting with their friends The R had to asked them to focus on the lesson

Ss read their lines individually, the R went around and observed Some weak students had difficulty in reading they asked their friends how to read the difficult words After that, the R asked students to practice reading in groups Some students read their line confidently, some weak Ss couldn‟t read fluently and they were criticized by other group members The strong students then model the reading to the weak ones Some

Ss still did not concentrate they were busy to do other things, the others had to call their name when it came to their turn

T finished the class by remind Ss to practice at home and next lesson would be the performance time

ANNEXE B SPEAKING TEST Pre-test

This pictures show a story It’s called, “Fred’s bad day” Fred gets up late in the morning Now look at the pictures and continue the story!

This pictures show a story It’s called “Ben loves ice- cream” Ben is in the kitchen His mom is giving him some ice-cream Now look at the pictures and continue the story!

This pictures show a story It’s called, “Tom’s birthday at the zoo It is Tom’s birthday Tom and his friends go to the zoo Now look at the pictures and continue the story!

BY GALL, BORG AND GALL (2003, p 571)

Range Fluency Pronunciation Accuracy Vocabulary

10 The speakers speak very fluently in communication to perform the expected competence

The speaker never makes pronunciation mistakes in performing the expected competency; intonation and stress are appropriate; all sound are unambiguous and can be understood

The speaker never makes any grammatical mistakes; both in basic grammatical structures (like phrases, simple and compound sentences) and in complex structure (like complex sentences)

The speaker uses so many vocabulary variations and makes no mistakes in word choices in performing the expected competency

9 The speaker speaks fluently in communication to perform the expected competence, but there are natural hesitations

The speaker almost never makes pronunciation mistakes in performing the expected competency; intonation and stress are appropriate; a few sounds are ambiguous but can be understood

The speaker almost never make any grammatical mistakes but makes very few mistakes in complex structure (like complex sentences), however those mistakes do not impede meaning

The speaker uses many vocabulary variations and only makes very few mistakes in word choices in performing the expected competency

8 The speaker speaks quite fluently although there are hesitations which are not quite natural hesitations

The speaker rarely makes pronunciation mistakes in performing the expected competency; intonation and stress are sometimes not quite appropriate; some sounds are rather ambiguous but can be understood

The speaker makes grammatical mistakes very rare in basic grammatical structure (like phrases, simple and compound sentences) and make few mistakes in complex structure (like complex structure(like complex sentences), in performing the expected competence so that they rather impede meaning

The speaker uses quite many vocabulary variations and makes few mistakes in word choices but those are sufficient and do not impede meaning in performing the expected competency

7 The speaker speaks quite fluently although there are often hesitations which are not quite natural

The speaker sometimes makes pronunciation mistakes in performing the expected competence; intonation and stress are sometimes not quite appropriate; some sounds are rather ambiguous but can be understood

The speaker rarely makes grammatical mistakes vary rare in basic grammatical structure (like phrases, simple and compound sentences) and makes some mistakes in complex structure (like complex sentences),

So that they rather impede meaning

The speaker used few vocabulary variations and uses word choices which are not quite appropriate but sufficient to perform the expected competence, he/she sometimes has to explain ideas to get the appropriate words

6 The speaker speaks does not quite fluently; sometimes he/she is impeded by language problems so that he/ she speaks rather slowly and hesitantly; sometimes those problems disrupt performance

The speaker often makes pronunciation mistakes in performing the expected competency; intonation and stress are appropriate; some sounds are rather ambiguous and rather difficult to be understood

The speaker sometimes makes grammatical mistakes very rare in basic grammatical structure (like phrases, simple and compound sentences) and makes quite a lot mistakes in complex structure (like complex sentences), so that they rather impede meaning

The speaker uses very few vocabulary variations and uses word choices which are not quite appropriate and not quite sufficient to perform the expected competency, he/she needs to explain ideas to get the appropriate words

5 The speaker does not speak quite fluently; speak slowly and hesitantly; those problems disrupt the performance

The speaker makes pronunciation mistakes very often in performing the expected competency; intonation and stress are appropriate; many sounds are ambiguous and difficult to be understood