TelevisionandThe Internet
Having already done my fair share of internet surfing, I was
excited to
finally have the opportunity to do a research paper that involved
this vast and
seemingly boundless electronic world. It is easy to passively
interact with the
rest of the world and scan effortlessly through millions of pages
of information,
some of which is useful, some of which simply takes up space; the
problem that
many researchers and interest groups face is making sense of the
whole thing.
What effects does theinternet have on people? This question is
no doubt an
immense one. In this paper I will attempt to explore the effects
the internet
has on one major aspect of our everyday lives: television. The
internet is not
only linked to television in the sense that they both convey vast
amounts of
information, but they both seem to complement each other. The
internet is
presenting vast amounts of information about our favorite
television shows as
well as providing an arena for discussion about the programs. I
will present to
you what is available out there and hypothesize how this can
enhance or alter
one's experience with television. Included in this paper will be
actual
responses from individuals around the world who responded to a
survey I posted
on various internet newsgroups devoted to specific television
shows. The most
relevant responses are attached as an appendix at the end of this
paper.
I will first briefly define the terms that I will use to
avoid any
ambiguities. When I refer to the internet, I refer to the vast
encyclopedia of
information presented through a graphical interface as pages, or
web sites.
Newsgroups refer to a different aspect of the world-wide web.
They consist of
over ten thousand separate and specific forums or centers where
people post
comments or remarks and read other's replies or comments. Each
newsgroup is
devoted to a different theme. For example, there are over two
hundred devoted to
television; one or two for Friends, one for Party of Five, one
for the CBC, etc.
Chat groups are an interactive aspect of the world-wide web in
which people can
talk in real time. There is an unlimited number of channels one
can speak on,
although there are more popular ones with specific themes; for
example, the
channel alt.tv.simpsons is a popular channel for Simpsons fans to
discuss the
show. These are the main aspects of the world-wide web which can
handle affairs
dealing with television. The broadest, of course, is the
internet. I will refer
to those who browse theinternet as "surfers." (Please note that
most of the
information I am presenting refers to The Simpsons since it is by
far the most
popular television show portrayed on the internet, having what
appears to be the
most web sites, by far the most newsgroup postings, andthe most
chat lines)
The amount and variety of information available on the
internet is
beyond comprehension. Television guides from around the world
(including
TVGuide) are all on theinternet in their entirety, in a
searchable form
including descriptions of the episodes, reviews etc. Features
include the
ability to search TVGuide for all shows in the next two weeks
that have the any
given word in it, "shark" for example. This not only increases
the amount of
television one watches (i.e. they don't miss interesting shows
they would
otherwise not know about), but most likely enhances the
experience of watching
the show since they can learn much about the episode beforehand.
For example, in
the description of the show they might link you to a site that
gives you extra
background information on sharks. All major networks have their
own sites with
complete time grids for the week, descriptions of shows and
actors and various
additional information, such as David Letterman's Top Ten Lists.
Countless web
sites are also devoted to specific television shows. For example,
while
performing a search for the show X-Files (a unique name), I came
up with over
20,000 direct references to the show. The sites essentially
expand on the
experience of television for the viewer. Any individual can find
any information
they require about a series, specific episode, or character. The
information on
characters can include both their fictional roles and their
real-life situation.
(Sites devoted to some of the better looking actors and actresses
seem to be a
very popular attraction). Therefore, if someone wanted to inquire
about an
aspect of a series, which will most likely enhance his or her
experience for the
show, the information is available in minutes. For example, I was
curious as to
who wrote one of my favorite Simpsons episodes, The Monorail.
Within one minute,
I had discovered that Conan O'Brien had written it, enhancing my
appreciation
for both The Simpsons and his talk show.
Most "official" sites, either sponsored by the show or
the network,
provide scripts to past episodes and details on, or clues to,
future episodes;
often explaining the motivations and/or hidden agendas behind
many of the
episodes. People from around the world can either follow a show
that they don't
have access to (see responses 5, 15), perhaps in a different
country, or read
the summaries of episodes that they have missed. Included in
these sites are
popular images and sounds of the characters, trivia based on the
episode,
internet "treasure hunts," as well as other interactive elements;
all promoting
increased interest in the show as well as rampant discussions on
the chat lines
and newsgroups. One of the most popular interactive events on the
internet was a
"Who Shot Mr. Burns?" contest. In the season finale of The
Simpsons, Mr. Burns
was shot and a long series of deliberately intricate and
ambiguous clues were
presented in the episode. Throughout the summer, the "official"
web site held a
contest. Each week new clues were presented and a new suspect
analysed while
surfers were allowed to cast their votes. The contest ended when
the season
premiere revealed the shooter. This method for enhancing viewers'
interests in a
series has grown in popularity, with similar contests appearing
at other
programs' web sites. Another interesting interactive aspect of
the internet has
been a "cyber-series" of Homicide, the series. An entire season
of the show,
which is actually a pseudo-spin-off of the series, was presented
on the internet.
Each week a new episode added to the series, with short movies,
pictures, and
text, all in an interactive context. As you can see, the internet
has provided
not only the viewer with all the information he needs to enhance
his experience
and interests in the series, it has provided the networks and/or
producers a
medium to advertise the program and stimulate interest in the
show in a unique,
engaging, and seemingly effective manner.
The newsgroups and chat lines provide the most
interactive and by far
the most absorbing facet of theinternet which is having an
effect on our
experience with television. This is where the fans (or non-fans…)
can express
themselves and learn about the interests of others. The
newsgroups are filled
with questions, comments, remarks, and replies every day
pertaining to an array
of issues surrounding their series of choice. Typically each
television-related
newsgroup gets between 100 to over a thousand posts a day from
fans around the
world. Some sample numbers of posts per day include: 155 for
Friends, 324 for
Party of Five, 310 for Seinfeld, 800 for X-Files, and 1106 for
The Simpsons
(data collected once a day for three days). The newsgroups and
chat lines are
where the true uses and gratifications of television are
enhanced. The diversion
that television provides is augmented, while the maintenance of
personal
relations and social interactions are no doubt the main feature
of these
services. They allow viewers with common interests who live down
the street, or
on the other side of the planet, to bond with each other and
reinforce or
reconsider each others opinions. Para-social interactions no
doubt arise as well.
In response number 3, the fan believes he has established a
relationship with
one of the Beverly Hills 90210 characters. Assuming this person
is serious
(which can never be safely assumed), we quite noticeably see the
extent to which
the internet has elevated viewers' experiences with television.
The topics presented in newsgroups and chat lines are
tremendously diverse
and at the same time quite interesting. Common themes that come
up include:
favorite episode, favorite line (from any character or one in
particular), who
dresses the best, ideas for future shows, and hidden messages or
meanings in any
given episode, or in the series in general. The endless search
for hidden
messages or alternative interpretations is the most intriguing
aspect of the
internet that has shaped or enhanced our experience with
television. Producers
typically convey a dominant ideology in mind when creating a
series or episode;
a meaning or message that they want to communicate to the
audience. The true
message transmitted by any given episode or series is determined
by the way we
decode the semiotics or messages that are portrayed to us either
through text,
sound, or image. What happens in newsgroups and on chat lines is
that hundreds
or thousands of individuals come together to discuss the series
or episode, ty
pically soon after it airs. The result of this negotiated-reading
is the
unveiling of new meanings, some intended by the producers, some
unintended. This
type of analysis is of great interest to most, as it allows for a
deeper
involvement into the series that you love. Other chat lines and
newsgroups are
more simplistic. The newsgroup for Beverly Hills 90210, for
example, usually
consists of fans' remarks about how good Valerie looked or how
upset they are
that Steve said what he said about Brandon. Either way, these
facets of the
world-wide web allow for people who truly love the show to get
together and
discuss it, in whatever fashion they choose. The end result is
the same:
interest in the show is augmented andthe uses and gratifications
derived from
the show are enhanced. The viewers, however, are not the only
ones to benefit
from the opportunities theinternet provides.
Networks and producers have gained an immediate link to the
audiences that
they are seeking to interpret and satisfy. Producers, writers,
executives, and
presidents are uninhibited from anonymously going onto these chat
lines or
newsgroups and asking questions and reading comments or feedback.
(To prove this
fact, when I posted my question on theinternet for this essay, I
received two
replies from executives from Due South (Story Department
Coordinator) and an
unspecified show who both wanted a copy of this paper or some
sort of showing as
to how people responded.) All major networks andtelevision shows
provide
special nights on selected chat lines in which a writer,
producer, or actor will
appear on the line to answer questions in real-time. Networks and
most
"official" television series sites also have e-mail addresses
which are directly
linked to the head offices. Viewers can therefore send comments
or suggestions,
or questions (direct answers are rare however), to the
executives. This also in
creases viewers' interest in a program since he or she might feel
that they have
had a say in what is happening in future episodes.
With all the benefits that theinternet provides, surfers
must be aware
that theinternet has its drawbacks. The most obvious problem
that has recently
become a reality is the fact that there is simply too much out
there. When you
want to access specific information it is often difficult to find
it very
efficiently. There are many official sites, yet there many out
there who are
simply fanatics of the program and post personal information
about themselves
and what they like about the show. The potential problems with
this are twofold.
Firstly, copyright laws are virtually ignored on the on-line
world. This may not
concern us, but for the networks and producers this is of primary
importance.
Countless images and sounds are distributed at will by die-hard
fans. This may
promote thetelevision series to a certain extent, but copyright
laws are no
doubt being infringed upon. Secondly, there is no limit to the
amount of false
and misleading information that can circulate on the internet,
newsgroups, or
chat lines. For whatever reason imaginable, some people get a
kick out of
starting rumors or misleading people with respect to an aspect of
a program.
Therefore, with all its benefits and enhancements, one must
always be cautious
as to how they interpret the information they are being doused
with.
I hope that I have provided a broad enough scope of the
internet in this
short space to allow you to realize the powerful impact that it
has had on our
experience with television. I did not directly include all the
responses to my
question in this paper, as it would have taken up too much space.
Rather, I
attempted to use their opinions as support for my hypothesis, and
instead
included a selection of the responses in an appendix for you to
read. The world-
wide web and its many facets have no doubt been exploited by
television viewers
to enhance the uses and gratifications that television provides
them with. The
reason the world-wide web has become so popular is not simply
because there is
so much information out there, but because it appeals to the
individual.
Whatever you personal interests may be, however strange or
uncommon, chances are
that you can seek refuge in this vast electronic universe.
Whether you are
looking for simple textual facts, a picture of Courtney Cox, what
Homer said to
Bart right after he stole his wallet on last night's episode, or
simply looking
for someone to share your interests with, theinternet provides
it for you in
the comfort of your own home. In conclusion, theinternet a
complex and
interactive medium that, as I have shown, greatly enhances one's
personal
experience with television.
. explore the effects
the internet
has on one major aspect of our everyday lives: television. The
internet is not
only linked to television in the sense that they. to get
together and
discuss it, in whatever fashion they choose. The end result is
the same:
interest in the show is augmented and the uses and gratifications
derived