A SELF-ASSESSMENT BASED METHOD FOR POST- COMPLETION AUDITS IN PAPER PRODUCTION LINE INVESTMENT PROJECTS doc

193 852 0
A SELF-ASSESSMENT BASED METHOD FOR POST- COMPLETION AUDITS IN PAPER PRODUCTION LINE INVESTMENT PROJECTS doc

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

C247etukansi.fm Page Monday, June 12, 2006 1:36 PM ACTA OULU 2006 UNIVERSITY OF OULU P.O Box 7500 FI-90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND A C TA U N I V E R S I TAT I S S E R I E S A B C D E F G E D I T O R S SCIENTIAE RERUM NATURALIUM Professor Mikko Siponen HUMANIORA Professor Harri Mantila TECHNICA Professor Juha Kostamovaara MEDICA Professor Olli Vuolteenaho O U L U E N S I S C 247 ACTA Timo Jortama A SELF-ASSESSMENT BASED METHOD FOR POSTCOMPLETION AUDITS IN PAPER PRODUCTION LINE INVESTMENT PROJECTS SCIENTIAE RERUM SOCIALIUM Senior assistant Timo Latomaa SCRIPTA ACADEMICA Communications Officer Elna Stjerna OECONOMICA Senior Lecturer Seppo Eriksson EDITOR IN CHIEF Professor Olli Vuolteenaho EDITORIAL SECRETARY Publication Editor Kirsti Nurkkala ISBN 951-42-8123-3 (Paperback) ISBN 951-42-8124-1 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3213 (Print) ISSN 1796-2226 (Online) U N I V E R S I T AT I S O U L U E N S I S FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF OULU C TECHNICA ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS C Te c h n i c a TIMO JORTAMA A SELF-ASSESSMENT BASED METHOD FOR POST-COMPLETION AUDITS IN PAPER PRODUCTION LINE INVESTMENT PROJECTS Academic Dissertation to be presented with the assent of the Faculty of Technology, University of Oulu, for public discussion in Raahensali (Auditorium L10), Linnanmaa, on June 21st, 2006, at 12 noon O U L U N Y L I O P I S TO, O U L U 0 Copyright © 2006 Acta Univ Oul C 247, 2006 Supervised by Professor Juhani Niskanen Professor Pekka Kess Reviewed by Professor Josu Takala Doctor Kari Juppi ISBN 951-42-8123-3 (Paperback) ISBN 951-42-8124-1 (PDF) http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514281241/ ISSN 0355-3213 (Printed ) ISSN 1796-2226 (Online) http://herkules.oulu.fi/issn03553213/ Cover design Raimo Ahonen OULU UNIVERSITY PRESS OULU 2006 Jortama, Timo, A self-assessment based method for post-completion audits in paper production line investment projects Faculty of Technology, University of Oulu, P.O.Box 4000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Oulu, P.O.Box 4200, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland Acta Univ Oul C 247, 2006 Oulu, Finland Abstract The aim of this technologically oriented study was to develop an evaluation method for postcompletion audits of investment projects in paper production lines The development work was based on the constructive research approach The objectives of the method were practical applicability, a comprehensive framework, and measures of project performance The evaluation method developed here is based on an adapted Malcolm Baldrige self-assessment framework, which has been embedded with three evaluation perspectives: project Targets (T), Risk management (R), and company Strategy (S) The compositions of these perspectives i.e TRS perspectives, serve as the fundamental basis for a value added project The evaluation criteria have been designed to fulfil the requirements of the paper industry and demanding projects Scoring guidelines are used as a basis for evaluation results Furthermore, supportive evaluation tools were developed to improve the accuracy and comparability of evaluation results Evaluation is conducted by a group which consists of qualified tutors, project experts and facilitators The latter are used especially to increase objectivity The method was tested with two cases studies which were applied in a greenfield paper machine project The first case study focused on technology choices The second case study was a full-scale study of the whole project scope The evaluation results were relatively accurate, and feedback results were particularly positive Usage of the TRS perspectives can produce information which benefits decision-making The method is capable of measuring both technical facts and subjective opinions Moreover, the method is applicable in practice and can improve the investment process in general Keywords: evaluation, paper machine, technology, TQM To my family Acknowledgements This thesis was completed while working as a technology manager in the Graphic Papers business area in Stora Enso Oyj The generation of the research idea started years ago when I was working in various positions at the Oulu paper mill, actually since 1996 The stimulus for doing the research has been the fascinating atmosphere of carrying out ever more successful paper machine projects I would like to express my gratitude to Stora Enso Oyj and to the persons in Corporate Strategy as well as the Oulu mill management for making this research possible Furthermore, I am grateful to everybody who participated in the case study of the Oulu PM7 project My special thanks go to the people in the Imatra Research Center, whose professional contribution to the search for information has been essential Mr Petri Nieminen and Mr Mauri Koivuranta as my associates in our daily work have contributed to the research with their thought-provoking discussions and viewpoints I want to thank both of them for their input I wish to thank Mr Hannu Ruokolainen and Mr Sami Pitkänen Sr for their support and interest in this research They have also inspired me as pioneers in world-class projects During all these years Mr Pertti Pitkänen has given me his continuous support and encouragement, which has been vital for doing the thesis I am deeply grateful for all this I wish to thank my supervisors, Professor Juhani Niskanen and Professor Pekka Kess, for the arrangements and their guidance in the research I wish to acknowledge Professor Josu Takala and Doctor Kari Juppi for reviewing the manuscript of this thesis and giving valuable comments Ms Sue Pearson of Pelc Southbank Languages is acknowledged for revising the English of the manuscript Finally, I would like to thank my wife Pirjo for her support and my daughter Laura for her patience, and both of them for their understanding throughout this project Kempele, April 2006 Timo Jortama References Aho T (1982) Investointilaskelmat Weilin+Göös & Suomen Ekonomiliitto, Vaasa, 317 p Ainscough M, Neailey K & Tennant C (2003) A self-assessment tool for implementing concurrent engineering through change management International Journal of Project Management 6(21): 425-431 Airila M & Pekkanen M (2002) Tekniikan alan väitöskirjaopas Teknillinen Korkeakoulu (TKK), Hallinto-osaston julkaisuja 03/2002, 72 p Alajoutsijärvi K (1996) Rautainen pari – Kymmenen ja Valmetin suhde, lähiverkosto ja makrovoimat 1948-90 Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, 279 p + appendices 35 p Alessandri TM (2002) A portfolio of decision processes: Rationality in capital investments under perceptions of risk and uncertainty Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UMI Dissertation Services, Michigan, 163 p + appendices 15 p Alteborg S & Sandslätt P (2005) Large capital investments at Stora Enso – a review of project implementation methods M.Sc thesis, Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, 114 p + appendices 87 p Andersen ES, Dyrhaug QX & Jessen SA (2002) Evaluation of Chinese projects and comparison with Norwegian projects International Journal of Project Management 8(20): 601-609 Angelis DI & Lee CY (1996) Strategic investment analysis using activity based costing concepts and analytical hierarchy process techniques International Journal of Production Research 5(34): 1331-1345 Ansoff HI (1984) Strategisen johtamisen käsikirja Otava, Keuruu, 328 p Anttila A (2002) Investointien tuoton ja riskin arviointi suomalaisissa metsätoimialan suuryrityksissä pro gradu thesis, Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu, Helsinki, 70 p Araújo LP (2004) Stora Enso moving into Latin America Solutions! 1(87): 65-66 Arbnor I & Bjerke B (1997) Methodology for creating business knowledge SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 548 p Artto K (1997) Projektien riskienhallinnan anatomia Projektitoiminta 2(20): 10-12 Artto K (1999) Riskienhallinnan käytännön sovellutukset Projektitoiminta 2(22): 22-27 Artto K (2002) Do project success studies contribute towards new successful project management practices? Project Management, Project Management Association Finland, 1(8): 4-6 Asprem M, Lopez R & Shaw J (2004) Why paper is lagging Merryl Lynch report 29 March, 25 p Asprem M, Lopez R & Shaw J (2005a) Capital structure Merryl Lynch report February, p Asprem M et al (2005b) Paper & packaging Merryl Lynch report 21 February, 16 p 178 Baliga S & Sjöström T (2001) Optimal design of peer review and self-assessment schemes RAND Journal of Economics 1(32): 27-51 Benavent FB (2006) TQM application through self-assessment and learning: some experiences from two EQA applicants Quality Management Journal 1(13): 7-25 Bergman MA & Johansson P (2002) Large investments in the pulp and paper industry: a count data regression analysis Journal of Forest Economics 1(8): 29-52 Bhattacharya A, Hemerling J, Michael D, Nicol R, Tang T, Waddell K & Wong J (2006) Organizing for global advantage in China, India, and other rapidly developing economics [online] The Boston Consulting Group [cited 18 March 2006] Available from: http://www.bcg.com/publications/files/Organizing_for_Global_Advantage_in_China_India_and _Other_Rapidly_Developing_Economies_Mar06.pdf Belliveau P, Griffin A & Somermeyer S (2002) The PDMA toolbook for new product development John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 472 p Bodman J (2000) Gigainvestoinnin elinkaarituottoihin vaikuttavien tekijöiden arviointi, case: Metsä-Serla, Kaskisten sellutehdas M.Sc thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, 153 p + appendices p Booth P & Schulz AK-D (2004) The impact of an ethical environment on managers’ project evaluation judgements under agency problem conditions Accounting, Organizations and Society 5-6(29): 473-488 Borgonovo E & Peccati L (2004) Sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation International Journal of Production Economics 1(90): 17-25 Boucher TO, Gogus O & Wicks EM (1997) A comparison between two multiattribute decision methodologies used in capital investment decision analysis The Engineering Economist 3(42): 179-202 BrainyQuote (2006) Quotes by Peter F Drucker [online] [cited 18 March 2006] Available from: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/peter_f_drucker.html Bremser WG & Brasky NP (2004) Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement R&D Management 3(34): 229-238 Brown JP, Massey AP & Boling E (2005) Evaluation of knowledge management systems: insights from study of a technical support knowledge base Knowledge Management Research & Practice 2(3): 49-59 CII (1995) Pre-project planning handbook Construction Industry Institute – CII, special publication 39-2, Austin, 132 p Collan M (2004) Fuzzy real investment valuation model for giga-investments, and a note on gigainvestment lifecycle and valuation TUCS Technical Report no 617, Åbo Akademi University, 17 p Deng S, Li Y & Chen J (1997) Evaluating foreign investment environment in China: a systematic approach European Journal of Operational Research 1(100): 16-26 Diesen M (1998) Economics of the pulp and paper industry Papermaking science and technology book series, book 1, Finnish Paper Engineers’ Association and TAPPI, Fapet Oy, Jyväskylä, 186 p Dixit AK & Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 468 p DNV (2005) SCC -Safety Checklist for Contractors [online] [cited 29 December 2005] Available from: http://www.dnv.com/certification/managementsystems/healthandsafety/SCC.asp?print=1 Drucker PF (2005) The essential Drucker – The best of sixty years of Peter Drucker’s essential writings on management HarperCollins Publishers Inc., New York, 358 p Durairaj SK, Ong SK, Nee AYC & Tan RBH (2002) Evaluation of life cycle cost analysis methodologies Corporate Environmental Strategy 1(9): 30-39 179 Dussauge P, Hart S & Ramanantsoa B (1992) Strategic technology management John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 218 p EFQM (2005) EFQM definition of self-assessment [online] [cited 27 December 2005] Available from: http://www.efqm.org/Default.aspx?tabid=43 Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research Academy of Management Review 4(14): 532-550 Elton EJ, Gruber MJ, Brown SJ & Goetzmann WN (2003) Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA, 705 p Espacenet (2006) Number of patents – data search [online] [cited April 2006] Available from: http://fi.espacenet.com/search97cgi/s97_cgi.exe?Action=FormGen&Template=fi/fi/quick.hts Evans JR & Jack EP (2003) Validating key results linkages in the Baldrige Performance Excellence model Quality Management Journal 2(10): 7-24 Flynn BB & Saladin B (2001) Further evidence on the validity of the theoretical models underlying the Baldrige criteria Journal of Operations Management 6(19): 617-652 Frame DJ (1994) The new project management – tools for an age of rapid change, corporate reengineering, and other business realities Jossey Bass Inc., San Francisco, USA, 328 p Ford MW & Evans JR (2001) Baldrige assessment and organizational learning: the need for change management Quality Management Journal 3(8): 9-25 Ford MW & Evans JR (2002) Models for organizational self-assessment Business Horizons 6(45): 25-32 Gobuleva O (2001) Foreign investment decision-making in transition economies, Doctoral dissertation Stockholm University, Stockholm, 294 p Haapanen L (1995) Investointipäätökseen liittyvän epävarmuuden vähentäminen asiakkaiden tarpeet huomioon ottamalla, Conjoint-analyysin soveltaminen Rautaruukki Oy Raahen terästehtaan investointipäätökseen Pro gradu thesis, Oulu University, Oulu, 86 p + appendices 59 p Haase S (2006) A story of superlatives IPW International Paperworld 1(2006): 27-30 Hahtola K (2000) Fine paper dynamics M.Sc thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, 96 p Hakkarainen V, Takala J & Kess P (2002) Development of effective supply network 12th International Working Seminar on Production Economics, IGLS’ 2002, 18-22 February, Innsbruck, Austria, p 159-170 Hallikas J (2003) Managing risk in supplier networks: case studies in inter-firm collaboration Doctoral dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, 60 p + appendices 13 p + publications Hameri A-P & Lehtonen J-M (2001) Production and supply management strategies in Nordic paper mills Scandinavian Journal of Management 3(17): 379-396 Hangasluoma J (1999) Toimittajakulttuurien vaikutukset uusintaprojektien käytännön toteutuksessa AEL Paperi- ja kartonkitehtaan rebuild-seminaari, September 1999, Vantaa Harris E (1999) Project risk assessment: a European field study British Accounting Review 3(31): 347-371 Hartley JF (1994) Case studies in organizational research In: Cassell C & Symon G (eds) Qualitative methods in organizational research – a practical guide SAGE Publications Ltd, London: 208-229 Hietala J (2005) Safety of investment projects Personal communication and material, Stora Enso, Oulu Hiltunen K (2003) Six Sigma - 6σ Course material [online], Tampere University of Technology, Institute of Production Engineering, Tampere, 22 p [cited 10 April 2005] Available from: http://pe.tut.fi/courses/laadvarm.nsf/0/7270533316965d79c2256d9500301d59/$FILE/Six%20si gma.rtf 180 Honko J, Aatto P & Virtanen K (1982) Yrityksen investointiprosessin kriittiset kohdat Kyriiri Oy, Joensuu, 155 p Houni P, Kallioniemi P, Krause M, Miettinen P, Rättö-Ihalainen E (1997) Turvallisuus investointihankkeen toteutuksessa Teollisuusvakuutus Oy, 97 p Hussey D (2000) Strategy and planning – A manager’s guide John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, England, 289 p Hwang H-S (2004) Web-based multi-attribute analysis model for engineering project evaluation Computers & Industrial Engineering 4(46): 669-678 Härmälä J (2005) Jukka Härmälä interviewed in Swedish daily newspaper Stora Enso InSite, March 2nd 2005, Available from: http://insite.storaenso.com/CDAvgn/cdaMain/0,,1_-200873583-en,00.html IEC 300-3-9 (1995) IEC 300-3-9 Risk analysis of technological systems International Electrotechnical Commission IEC, Geneva, 67 p IEC 62198 (2001) IEC 62198 Project risk management – application guidelines International Electrotechnical Commission IEC, Geneva, 37 p IPSG (2002) The common assessment framework (CAF) [online], 2nd quality conference for public administrations in EU, Innovative Public Service Group (IPSG), Copenhagen October 2002, 60 p [cited 14 August 2005] Available from: http://www.eipa.nl/CAF/Brochure/CAF2002_Eng.pdf Jaafari A (2001) Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift International Journal of Project Management 2(19): 89-101 Jaakko Pöyry (2002) Jaakko Pöyry Consulting Oy, unpublished report, Stora Enso Used as a secondary reference for the general background material Jago AG & Vroom VH (1980) An evaluation of two alternatives to the Vroom/Yetton normative model Academy of Management Journal 2(23): 347-355 Johnson G & Scholes K (2002) Exploring corporate strategy, text and cases Financial Times Prentice Hall, an imprint of Pearson Education, Harlow, England, 1082 p Jokisuu T (2002) Investointiprosessi, case: Linnanmäki ja Muumimaailma Pro gradu thesis, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 83 p + appendices 30 p Jovanovic P (1999) Application of sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation under uncertainty and risk International Journal of Project Management 4(17): 217-222 Jyrkkiö E & Riistama V (2000) Laskentatoimi päätöksenteon apuna WSOY, Porvoo, 334 p Järvinen P, Kronström V, Poskela J & Artto K (2002) Suorituskyvyn mittaaminen ja mittareiden kehittäminen projektiliiketoiminnassa TAI Tutkimuslaitos, Espoo, 93 p Kaplan RS & Norton DP (2003) Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes Harvard Business School Press, 454 p Kasanen E, Lukka K & Siitonen A (1991) Konstruktiivinen tutkimusote liiketaloustieteessä Liiketaloudellinen aikakauskirja 3: 301-329 Kauppinen S (1999) Development of technological competitiveness by integrating instruments and automation in process machinery Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu, Oulu, 199 p + appendices Kennedy JA & Mills RW (1988) Post auditing and project control: a question of semantics? Management Accounting 10(66): 53-54 Khalil TM (2000) Management of technology – the key to competitiveness and wealth creation McGraw-Hill Companies, Fairfield, USA, 483 p Kharbanda OP & Stallworthy EA (1983) How to learn from project disasters, true-life stories with a moral for management Gower Publishing Company Ltd, Aldershot, Hants, England, 274 p Knight P (2004) Investments in the billions Pulp & Paper International 8(46): 30-32 181 Kolehmainen J (1996) Ylimmän johdon strategisiin investointipäätöksiin vaikuttavat tekijät: strategia ja taloudellinen analyysi Pro gradu thesis, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 106 p + appendices p Komulainen P (1999) Rebuild vai greenfield – priorisoitavat tekijät päätöksenteossa AEL Paperija kartonkitehtaan rebuild-seminaari, September 1999, Vantaa Kontio J & Haapasalo H (2005) A project model in managing production ramp-up – A case study in wire harness industry International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 1(2): 101-117 Kumar V, Murphy SA & Loo SCK (1996) An investment decision process: the case of advanced manufacturing technologies in Canadian manufacturing firms International Journal of Production Research 4(34): 947-958 Kurki H (1997) Päätöksenteko projektimäärittelyvaiheessa VTT Rakennustekniikka, Vantaa, 64 s Chin K-S, Pun K-F & Lau H (2003) Development of a knowledge-based self-assessment system for measuring organizational performance Expert Systems with Applications 4(24): 443-455 Kyllönen H (2004) Estimation method for automation profitability in a supply chain context, a case of paper industry Licentiate thesis, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, 121 p Kähkönen K (1996) Projektimäärittely ja sen laadukas toteuttaminen VTT Rakennustekniikka, Vantaa, 71 p Laamanen K (2002) Johda toimintaa prosessien verkkona – ideasta käytäntöön Suomen Laatukeskus Oy, Helsinki, 300 p Laitinen M (1999) Effect of rebuilds on board machine rebuilds MSc thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 113 p + appendices 19 p Laukka S (2000) Investoinnin kannattavuuden arviointi paperitehtaan raaka-ainemixin muuttuessa Pro gradu thesis, Oulu University, Oulu, 80 p Lehtiniemi S (2004) Arviointimenetelmien käyttö tietoteknisten investointien kannattavuustarkastelussa Pro gradu thesis, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku, 97 p Leivo K (2000) Investoinnin kannattavuuteen vaikuttavat ulkoiset ja sisäiset tekijät metsäteollisuusyrityksessä, case: Metsä-Serla Kirkniemi, PK1 MSc thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, 120 p + appendices 14 p Lillrank P (1998) Laatuajattelu Otava, Helsinki, 203 s Lillrank P (2006) Laatu – tuotantotalouden perusopintojakso [online] [cited 28 March 2006] Available from: http://www.tuta.hut.fi/studies/Courses_and_schedules/Teta/TU-22.1101/ brochure/luentokalvotS05/laatu.pdf Lindström M (2004) Ulkomaiset yritykset Suomessa: investointimotiivit ja näkemykset toimintaympäristöstä ETLAport no 917, Helsinki, 38 p Loch CH & Tapper UAS (2002) Implementing a strategy-driven performance measurement system for an applied research group The Journal of Product Innovation Management 3(19): 185-198 Lomperi E & Pirttinen A (ed.) (2003) Metso Paper Technology Days 2003 Metso Paper Inc, Jyväskylä, 255 p Loosveldt G, Carton A & Billet J (2004) Assessment of survey data quality: a pragmatic approach focused on interviewer tasks Journal of the Market Research Society 1(32): 65-82 Lowney B (2004) Global economic outlook: Is the global upswing sustainable RISI European Pulp & Paper Conference, March 2004, 17 p LSE (2005) Life Style Extra [online], Post-completion audit definition [cited 27 December 2005] Available from: http://www.lse.co.uk/financeglossary.asp?searchTerm=post-&iArticleID=1080 &definition=post-_completion_audit Lukka K & Tuomela TS (1998) Testattuja ratkaisuja liikkeenjohdollisiin ongelmiin: konstruktiivinen tutkimusote Yritystalous 4(56): 23-29 182 Lundmark R (2001) Choice of location for investments in the European paper industry: the impact of wastepaper Resources, Conservation and Recycling 3(33): 167-180 Mareschal B (1986) Stochastic multicriteria decision-making and uncertainty European Journal of Operational Research 1(26): 58-64 Martinsuo M, Aalto T & Artto K (2003) Projektisalkun johtaminen – Tuotekehitysprojektien valinta ja strateginen ohjaus Teknologiateollisuus ry, Helsinki, 177 p Maula M & Gordon M (2003) Finnish Industry Investment Ltd: An international evaluation Ministry of Trade and Industry, publications 1/2003, Helsinki, 173 p McInerney M (2003), Supply chain strategic alliances can help logistics teams provide value Pulp & Paper 10(77): 38-40 Metso (2005) Annual review 2005 [online] Metso Corporation [cited April 2006] Available from: http://www.metso.com/corporation/ir_eng.nsf/WebWID/WTB-060314-2256F-7D2F6/ $File/Metso_AR2005_eng.pdf Metsäteollisuus (2004) Maailman metsäteollisuus – tilastot [online] [cited April 2006] Metsäteollisuus ry, Finnish Forest Industries Federation Available from: http://www.forestindustries.fi/tilastot/#maailman Meyer SM & Collier DA (2001) An empirical test of the causal relationships in the Baldrige Health Care Pilot Criteria Journal of Operations Management 4(19): 403-425 Milis K & Mercken R (2004) The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of information and communication technology projects International Journal of Project Management 2(22): 87-97 Mohanty RP (1992) Project selection by a multiple-criteria decision-making method: an example from a developing country International Journal of Project Management 1(10): 31-38 Morris PWG (1988) Initiating major projects - the unperceived role of project management, Proceedings of the 9th Internet World Congress on Project Management, volume 2, September 4th-9th, Glasgow, UK, p 801-813 Munns AK & Bjeirmi BF (1996) The role of project management in achieving project success International Journal of Project Management 2(14): 81-87 Mustajärvi H (2003) Yrityksen investointiprosessi ja siihen vaikuttavat kognitiiviset yksinkertaistusprosessit Pro gradu thesis, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku, 100 p + appendices 19 p Nascimento JR (2005) Direct investment in sustainable forest-based businesses [online] InterAmerican Development Bank, May 2005, 34 p [cited April 2006] Available from: http://www.iadb.org/homeid/ws_presentation.pdf Neale B (1993) Linkages between investment post-auditing, capital expenditure and corporate strategy Management accounting 2(71): 20-22 Neale CW (1995) Post-completion audits: avoiding the pitfalls Managerial Auditing Journal 1(10): 17-24 Neilimo N & Näsi J (1980) Nomoteettinen tutkimusote ja suomalainen yrityksen taloustiede – tutkimus positivismin soveltamisesta Tampereen yliopisto, Yrityksen taloustieteen ja yksityisoikeuden laitoksen julkaisuja, Sarja A2: Tutkielmia ja raportteja 12, 82 p Nieminen P (2006) “Right things - things right” principle - presenting self-assessment results Personal communication and material, Stora Enso, Oulu Niskanen J (2005) Onko paperikone liian kallis? NIPPI, Oulu University, department of mechanical engineering, students of paper machine design, Oulu, 1(21): 2-3 NIST (2005a) Criteria for performance excellence [online] Baldrige National Quality Program 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 76 p [cited 14 August 2005], Available from: http://www.quality.nist.gov/PDF_files/ 2005_Business_Criteria.pdf 183 NIST (2005b) Frequently asked questions about the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award [online] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA, p [cited 15 September 2005], Available from: http://www.quality.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/ baldfaqs.htm NIST (2005c) Examiner booklet [online] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA, 10 p [cited 15 September 2005], Available from: http://www.quality.nist.gov/ Examiner_Booklet.htm NIST (2005d) Baldrige stock studies [online] including “Baldrige Index” and S&P Comparison charts and “Baldrige Index” Stock study methodology National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA, p [cited 15 September 2005], Available from: http://www.quality.nist.gov/Stock_Studies.htm Nixon B (1998) Research and development performance measurement: a case study Management Accounting Research 3(9): 329-355 Nofsinger JR (2005) The psychology of investing Pearson Education, New Jersey, 116 p Northcott D (1992) Capital investment decision-making Academic Press, London, 192 p Nurmi M (1991) Uusintainvestointeihin suuntautuneen investointistrategian arviointi; analyysi eräistä toteutuneista hankkeista M.Sc thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, 93 p + appendices 16 p Oakland JS (2004) Oakland on quality management Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 476 p Ofori-Amoah B (1993) Technology choice and diffusion in the manufacturing sector: the case of the twin-wire in the Canadian pulp and paper industry Geoforum 3(24): 315-326 Ojanen V, Piippo P & Tuominen M (2002) Applying quality award criteria in R&D project assessment International Journal of Production Economics 1(80): 119-128 O’Leary-Kelly SW & Vokurka RJ (1998) The empirical assessment of construct validity Journal of Operations Management 16(4): 387-405 Ottosson E & Weissenrieder F (1996) CVA – Cash Value Added – a new method for measuring financial performance SCA AB, Gothenburg University & Value Based Management FWC AB, 10 p [sited 19 August 2005] Available from: http://www.cva.se/files/ 111000000448/CVAPaper.pdf Pannirselvam GP, Siferd SP & Ruch WA (1998) Validation of the Arizona Governor’s Quality Award criteria: a test of the Baldrige criteria Journal of Operations Management 5(16): 529550 Pelin R (2004) Projektihallinnan käsikirja Projektijohtaminen Oy Risto Pelin, Jyväskylä, 400 p Peltonen M, Pursio S & Välisalo T (2001) Riskianalyysimenetelmät ja niiden arviointi Menetelmien edut ja rajoitukset projektiriskien analysoinnissa report no RIS B024, VTT Automaatio, Tampere, 26 p Pitkänen E (1990) Kustannus-hyötylaskelmien perusteet Helsinki School of Economics, education material O-38, 91 p Pitkänen P, Artto K & Kähkönen K (2000) Project risk management applications in industry IRNOP IV: Fourth international conference of the international research network on organizing by projects, 9th-12th January 2000, Sydney, Australia PMBOK (1996) A guide to the project management body of knowledge Project Management Institute Standards Committee, Project Management Institute (PMI), Upper Darby, PA, USA, 176 p PMBOK (2004) A guide to the project management body of knowledge – 3rd edition Project Management Institute (PMI), Newtown Square, PA, USA, 388 p Poh KL, Ang BW & Bai F (2001) A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods R&D Management 1(31): 63-75 Potter ME (1985) Competitive advantage – creating and sustaining superior performance The Free Press, New York, 557 p 184 Prueitt GC & Park CS (1991) Monitoring project performance with post-audit information: cash flow control charts The Engineering Economist 4(36): 307-335 Reijonen Y (1999) Uusintaprojektin riskit ja menestystekijät AEL Paperi- ja kartonkitehtaan rebuild-seminaari, September 1999, Vantaa Reilly FK & Norton EA (2003) Investments South-Western, Canada, 800 p Rintala K, Poskela J, Artto K & Korpi-Filppula M (2004) Information systems development for project portfolio management In: Hosni Y & Khalil TM, Management of technology Internet economy: Opportunities and challenges for developing regions of the world Elsevier Ltd, UK, p 265-280 Retting B (2006) Saksan monitahoiset näkymät Interviewed by Pitkänen R Kemira Solutions, Kemira Oyj, 1(2006): 4-7 Rohweder T (1993) Product reorientation in the Finnish paper industry Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 234 p + appendices 38 p Ronnila M (1991) Suomen kemiallisen metsäteollisuuden investointihankkeiden toteuttamiskelpoisuus ja vaikutus alan kannattavuuteen Pro gradu thesis, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 107 p Rooks A (2005) Global outlook: fair to middling Solutions! 1(88): 22-25 Rossi E (1991) An index method for environmental risk assessment in wood processing industry Academic Dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, 117 p Salminen J (2005) Measuring performance and determining success factors of construction sites Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 175 p + appendices 50 p Schwarber PD (2005) Leaders and the decision-making process Management Decision, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 7/8(43): 1086-1092 SFS-EN 414 (2000) Safety of machinery Rules for the drafting and presentation of safety standards Technical Committee CEN/TC 114 “Safety of machinery”, Suomen Standardoimisliitto SFS ry, Helsinki,58 p SFS-EN 1050 (1997) Safety of machinery Principles for risk assessment Technical Committee CEN/TC 114 “Safety of machinery”, Suomen Standardoimisliitto SFS ry, Helsinki, 41 p SFS-EN ISO 9000 (2005) Quality management systems Fundamentals and vocabulary Suomen Standardoimisliitto SFS ry, Helsinki, 69 p SFS-EN ISO 9004 (2001) Quality management systems Guidelines for performance improvement Suomen Standardoimisliitto SFS ry, Helsinki, 129 p SFS-EN ISO 12000-1 (2003) Safety of machinery Basic concepts, general principles for design Part 1: Basic terminology, methodology Technical Committee CEN/TC 114 “Safety of machinery”, Suomen Standardoimisliitto SFS ry, Helsinki, 98 p SFS-EN ISO 12000-2 (2003) Safety of machinery Basic concepts, general principles for design Part 2: Technical principles Technical Committee CEN/TC 114 “Safety of machinery”, Suomen Standardoimisliitto SFS ry, Helsinki, 76 p SFS-ISO 10006 (2004) Quality management systems Guidelines for quality management in projects ISO the International Organization for Standardization, Suomen Standardoimisliitto SFS ry, Helsinki, 61 p Siitonen S (2003) Impact of globalisation and regionalisation strategies on the performance of the world’s pulp and paper companies Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki School of Economics, HeSE print, Helsinki, 260 p + appendices Sherif M & McCowan AK (2001) Modelling project investment decisions under uncertainty using possibility theory International Journal of Project Management 4(19): 231-241 Shtub A, Bard JF & Globerson S (1994) Project management – engineering, technology and implementation Prentice-Hall International Inc, New Jersey, 634 p Sol P & Ghemawat P (1999) Strategic valuation of investment under competition Interfaces 6(29): 42-56 185 Spiegel M & Ziggers GW (1999) The application of the TQM-concept in food supply chains In: Werther W Jr., Takala J & Sumanth DJ (eds) Productivity & Quality Management Frontiers – VIII, 8th International Conference, June 14-16, 1999, Vaasa, p 724-736 Stelzer L (2006) Management and organizational behaviour [online] Handouts Seton Hall University, New Jersey, [cited April 2006], p Available from: http://pirate.shu.edu/ ~stelzele/daymbalectures/decision_making.htm Stillman HM (1997) How ABB decides on the right technology investments Research Technology Management 6(40): 14-22 Suhonen T (2006) World paper markets up to 2020 [online] Know-how wire – Jaakko Pöyry Magazine January 2006 [cited April 2006] Available from: http://forestindustry.poyry.com/ linked/en/news/KnowHowWire_January2006_internet.pdf Tahvanainen A-J & Hermans R (2005) Funding intellectual-capital-abundant technology development: empirical evidence from the Finnish biotechnology business Knowledge Management Research & Practise 2(3): 69-86 Takala J & Helo P (2000) Some experiences on empirical research approaches within case studies on DSSs in TM – Especially constructive research in business science (invited speech) 10th European Doctoral Summer School in Technology Management, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management (EIASM), 20th August – 1st September 2000 Twente, The Netherlands, p Takala J (2002) Analysing and synthesising multifocused manufacturing strategies by analytical hierarchy process International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, UK, 5(4): 345-350 p Takala J, Hirvelä J, Talonen T & Vuolteenaho R (2005) Making customized NPD project decisions for technology roadmapping 14th International Conference on Management of Technology, IAMOT (International Association for Mgmt of Technology), May 22-26, 2005, Vienna, 10 p Takkunen H (1997) Suomen metsäteollisuuden investointistrategiat ja niihin vaikuttavat tekijät Pro gradu thesis, Helsinki University, Helsinki, 77 p + appendices p Talentum (2005) Metsäteollisuus vallankumouksessa – STT news 18 July 2005 [online] Talentum Group [cited April 2006] Available from: http://www.talentum.com/doc.ot?d_id=234693 Talvitie M (2005) Planning and implementation of large capital projects MSc thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 132 p + appendices 27 p Tanner S & Tantawy B (2001) Lessons from the introduction of self-assessment – what are the key factors for success? The 6th TQM World Congress, 2001, Saint Petersburg, p 184-196 Tavana M (2003) CROSS: A multicriteria group-decision-making model for evaluating and prioritizing advanced-technology projects at NASA Interfaces 3(33): 40-56 Tennant C & Roberts P (2003) The creation and application of self-assessment process for new product introduction International Journal of Project Management 2(21): 77-87 Tilastokeskus (2005) Area and land use – updated September 2005 [online] [cited: 02 April 2006], available from: http://www.stat.fi/tup/maanum/05_pinta-ala_ja_maankaytto.xls Työturva (2005) Turvallisuusjohtaminen [online] Työturvallisuuskeskus, Helsinki [cited 29 December 2005] Available from: http://www.tyoturva.fi/ Tötterström J, Mäenpää M & Villanen H (2001) Teollinen koesuunnittelu ja FMEA Course material [online], Tampere University of Technology, Institute of Production Engineering, Tampere, 33 p [cited 10 April 2005] Available from: http://www.fmeainfocentre.com/ download/FinsFMEA.doc Veen-Dirks P & Wijn M (2002) Strategic control: meshing critical success factors with the Balanced Scorecard Long Range Planning 4(35): 407-427 Venäläinen J (2004) Price forecasts for capital budgeting – a study on the accuracy of paper and pulp price forecasts Pro gradu thesis, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 95 p 186 Viitala J (1995) Yrityksen investoinnin arviointi erilaisten laskentamallien avulla Thesis of Administrative Official, Tampere University, 34 p + appendices p VNP 629/1994 (1994) Valtioneuvoston päätös rakennustyön turvallisuudesta [online] Valtioneuvosto, Helsinki [cited 19 August 2005] Available from: http://www.finlex.fi/laki/ alkup/1994/19940629 Voith (2005) Voith AG – company data, Voith Paper [online] [cited April 2006] Available from: http://www.voith.com/e_voithgroup_companydata_sales_voithpaper.htm Vroom VH (2000) Leadership and the decision-making process In: Slocum JW Jr (ed) Organizational Dynamics 4(28): 82-94 Vroom VH, Jago AG, Eden D, Yetton PW & Craig JF (1998) Situation effects and levels of analysis in the study of leader participation Multiple levels as a self-fulfilling prophecy: one sees what one expects to see Integrating across levels of Analysis On interdependence and levels of analysis Participative leadership, in Leadership: The Multiple-Level approaches: Classical and new wave F Dansereau and FJ Ymmarino (eds.), JAI Press, Stamford, p 145189 Weaver PM, Gabel HL, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM & Wassenhove L (1997) Optimizing environmental product life cycles – a case study of European pulp and paper sector Environmental and Resource Economics 2(9): 199-224 Weckström NA (1996) Analysis of key parameters and mechanisms and development of a conceptual model of the behavior of the woodfree paper market M.Sc thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 162 p Wen JH, Yen DC & Binshan L (1998) Methods for measuring information technology investment payoff Human Systems Management 2(17): 145-153 Wiele A, Williams ART, Dale BG, Carter G, Kolb F, Luzon DM, Schmidt A & Wallace M (1996) Quality management self-assessment: an examination in European business Journal of General Management 1(22): 48-67 Yin RK (2003) Case study research – design and methods 3rd edition SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, 181 p Young R (2002) Multimodal investment choice analysis: application of goal programming for selection of transportation projects Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, UMI Dissertation Services, Michigan, 141 p + appendices 58 p Appendix The Baldrige National Quality Program (BNQP) criteria The Baldrige National Quality Program (BNQP) criteria (NIST 2005a) Categories & Items Leadership Description Point values 120 The Leadership category examines how your organization’s SENIOR LEADERS guide and sustain your organization Also examined are your organization’s GOVERNANCE and how your organization addresses its ethical, legal, and community responsibilities 1.1 Senior leadership 70 1.2 Governance and social responsibilities 70 Strategic planning 85 The Strategic planning category examines how your organization develops STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and ACTION PLANS Also examined are how your chosen STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and ACTION PLANS are deployed and changed if circumstances require, and how progress is measured 2.1 Strategy development 40 2.2 Strategy deployment 45 Customer and market focus 85 The Customer and market focus category examines how your organization determines the requirements, expectations, and preferences of CUSTOMER and markets Also examined is how your organization builds relationships with CUSTOMERS and determines the KEY factors that lead to CUSTOMER acquisition, satisfaction, loyalty, and retention, and to business expansion and SUSTAINABLITY 3.1 Customer and market knowledge 40 3.2 Customer relationship and satisfaction 45 Measurement, analysis, and knowledge management 90 The Measurement, analysis, and knowledge management category examines how your organization selects, gathers, analyses, manages, and improves its data, information, and KNOWLEDGE ASSETS Also examined is HOW YOUR organization reviews its performance 4.1 Measurement, Analysis, and review of organizational performance 45 4.2 Information and knowledge management 45 Human resource focus 85 The Human resource focus category examines HOW YOUR organization’s WORK SYSTEMS and your employee LEARNING and motivation enable employees to develop and utilize their full potential and AUGMENT with your organization’s overall objectives, strategy, and ACTION PLANS Also examined are your organization’s efforts to build and maintain a work environment and employee support climate conductive to PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE and to personal and organizational growth 5.1 Work systems 35 5.2 Employee learning and motivation 25 5.3 Employee well-being and satisfaction 25 188 Categories & Items Description Process management 85 45 6.1 Value creation process 6.2 Support process and operational planning Business results Point values The Process management category examines the KEY aspects of your organization’s PROCESS management, including KEY product, service, and business PROCESSES for creating CUSTOMER and organizational VALUE and KEY support PROCESSES This category encompasses all KEY PROCESSES and all work units 40 450 The Business results category examines your organizational PERFORMANCE and improvement in KEY business areas – product and service outcomes, CUSTOMER satisfaction, financial and marketplace PERFORMANCE, human resource RESULTS, operational PERFORMANCE, and leadership and social responsibility PERFORMANCE LEVELS are examined relative to those of competitors 7.1 Product and service outcomes 100 7.2 Customer-focused results 70 7.3 Financial and market results 70 7.4 Human resource results 70 7.5 Organizational effectiveness results 70 7.6 Leadership and social responsibility results Total points 70 1000 189 Appendix REC 7.6 LUMI7 – GAP analysis REC 7.6 LUMI7 – GAP analysis Overview: GAP analysis has been made for Stora Enso Oulu PM7, LUMI7 project, and the results have been calculated according to the final report (December 1999) and common target setting (YTA) reporting Calculations for percentage scoring are based on GAP analysis principles i.e “%-linear” is the linear correlation between GAP analysis results, and “%-arsinh” is the logarithmic correlation These calculations are valid in the area Results for Item 7.6 Assets & product performance BASIC GAP ANALYSIS 7.6 Assets & product performance Production, target, [t/a] Production, actual, [t/a] GAP-capacity, [%] Cost, target, [M€/a] Cost, actual, [M€/a] GAP-cost, [%] year 2.year 256 243 153 129 PM7 speed, target, [m/min] PM7, actual [m/min] GAP-PM7 speed, [%] PM7 Nov-Dec '99 average CM7 speed, target, [m/min] CM7, actual [m/min] GAP-CM7 speed, [%] CM7 Nov-Dec '99 average PM7 time-efficiency, target, [m/min] PM7 time-efficiency, actual [m/min] GAP-PM7 time-efficiency, [%] PM7 year '99 average L7 material efficiency, target, [m/min] L7 material efficiency, actual [m/min] GAP-L7 material efficiency, [%] Line no year '99 average Base paper formation, target, [%] Base paper formation, actual, [%] GAP-Base paper formation, [%] PM7 year '99 avg 65 gsm, grade C 288 299 156 142 total %-arsinh %-linear 544 542 -0,4 46 50 309 271 12,3 85 62 1220 1321 8,3 81 58 1450 1490 2,8 69 53 92 82 -10,9 17 39 80 80,8 1,0 60 51 5,90 5,99 -1,5 37 48 Remarks: The target value for PM7 speed was lower in the investment card (1150 m/min for 105 g/m2 products) and higher in the YTA targets (1300 m/min monthly average); the value 1220 m/min has been used according to experts’ recommendation YTA targets for material efficiency have been low Base paper formation values are measured without eucalyptus pulp C247etukansi.fm Page Monday, June 12, 2006 1:36 PM ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS SERIES C TECHNICA 230 Kansanen, Kimmo (2005) Wireless broadband single-carrier systems with MMSE turbo equalization receivers 231 Tarkkonen, Juhani (2005) Yhteistoiminnan ehdoilla, ymmärryksen ja vallan rajapinnoilla Työsuojeluvaltuutetut ja -päälliköt toimijoina, työorganisaatiot yhteistoiminnan areenoina ja työsuojelujärjestelmät kehittämisen kohteina 232 Ahola, Timo (2005) Intelligent estimation of web break sensitivity in paper machines 233 Karvonen, Sami (2006) Charge-domain sampling of high-frequency signals with embedded filtering 234 Laitinen, Risto (2006) Improvement of weld HAZ toughness at low heat input by controlling the distribution of M-A constituents 235 Juuti, Jari (2006) Pre-stressed piezoelectric actuator for micro and fine mechanical applications 236 Benyó, Imre (2006) Cascade Generalized Predictive Control—Applications in power plant control 237 Kayo, Olga (2006) Locally linear embedding algorithm Extensions and applications 238 Kolli, Tanja (2006) Pd/Al2O3 -based automotive exhaust gas catalysts The effect of BaO and OSC material on NOx reduction 239 Torkko, Margit (2006) Maatilakytkentäisten yritysten toimintamalleja Laadullinen tutkimus resursseista, kehittymisestä ja ohjaustarpeista 240 Hämäläinen, Matti (2006) Singleband UWB systems Analysis and measurements of coexistence with selected existing radio systems 241 Virtanen, Jani (2006) Enhancing the compatibility of surgical robots with magnetic resonance imaging 242 Lumijärvi, Jouko (2006) Optimization of critical flow velocity in cantilevered fluidconveying pipes, with a subsequent non-linear analysis 243 Stoor, Tuomas (2006) Air in pulp and papermaking processes 244 György, Zsuzsanna (2006) Glycoside production by in vitro Rhodiola rosea cultures 245 Özer-Kemppainen, Özlem (2006) Alternative housing environments for the elderly in the information society The Finnish experience Book orders: OULU UNIVERSITY PRESS P.O Box 8200, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland Distributed by OULU UNIVERSITY LIBRARY P.O Box 7500, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland C247etukansi.fm Page Monday, June 12, 2006 1:36 PM ACTA OULU 2006 UNIVERSITY OF OULU P.O Box 7500 FI-90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND A C TA U N I V E R S I TAT I S S E R I E S A B C D E F G E D I T O R S SCIENTIAE RERUM NATURALIUM Professor Mikko Siponen HUMANIORA Professor Harri Mantila TECHNICA Professor Juha Kostamovaara MEDICA Professor Olli Vuolteenaho O U L U E N S I S C 247 ACTA Timo Jortama A SELF-ASSESSMENT BASED METHOD FOR POSTCOMPLETION AUDITS IN PAPER PRODUCTION LINE INVESTMENT PROJECTS SCIENTIAE RERUM SOCIALIUM Senior assistant Timo Latomaa SCRIPTA ACADEMICA Communications Officer Elna Stjerna OECONOMICA Senior Lecturer Seppo Eriksson EDITOR IN CHIEF Professor Olli Vuolteenaho EDITORIAL SECRETARY Publication Editor Kirsti Nurkkala ISBN 951-42-8123-3 (Paperback) ISBN 951-42-8124-1 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3213 (Print) ISSN 1796-2226 (Online) U N I V E R S I T AT I S O U L U E N S I S FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF OULU C TECHNICA ... the research gap: Can a practical investment project technology evaluation method for post -completion audits in paper production lines based on a self-assessment framework produce information which... world forest area) Planted forests and new pulp mills as well as paper mills in Asia and South America have changed pulp and paper supply The world’s demand for paper and paperboard is currently increasing... the quantitative and qualitative quality of an investment project This study develops a method for evaluating investment projects in a paper production line in its technological and operational

Ngày đăng: 18/03/2014, 02:20

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • Acknowledgements

  • List of symbols and abbreviations

  • Contents

  • 1 Introduction

  • 2 Research issues

    • 2.1 Background

    • 2.2 Driving forces

    • 2.3 Research problem and questions

    • 2.4 Research approach

    • 2.5 Scope of research

    • 2.6 Preliminary assumptions

    • 2.7 Viewpoints of developing the evaluation method

    • 2.8 Definitions

    • 3 Literature review

      • 3.1 Project management

      • 3.2 Previous approaches for evaluation of investment projects

        • 3.2.1 Economic approach

        • 3.2.2 Scoring techniques and methods

        • 3.2.3 Self-assessment

        • 3.2.4 Pre-project alternative evaluation

        • 3.2.5 Technology audit model

        • 3.2.6 Technical age

        • 3.2.7 Other methods

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

Tài liệu liên quan