1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo Y học: Importin a binds to an unusual bipartite nuclear localization signal in the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein type I pptx

8 1.1K 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Nội dung

Importin a binds to an unusual bipartite nuclear localization signal in the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein type I Maria G. Romanelli and Carlo Morandi Department of Mother and Child, Biology and Genetics, University of Verona, Italy The heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) type I, a modulator of alternative splicing, localizes in the nucleoplasm of mammalian cells and in a discrete peri- nucleolar structure. HnRNP I contains a novel type of bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) at the N-terminus of the protein that we have previously named nuclear determinant localization type I (NLD-I). Recently, a neural counterpart of hnRNP I has been identified that contains a putative NLS with two strings of basic amino acids separated by a spacer of 30 residues. In the present study we show that the neural hnRNP I NLS is necessary and sufficient for nuclear localization and represents a variant of the novel bipartite NLS present in the NLD-I domain. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the NLD-I is transported into the nuc- leus by cytoplasmic factor(s) with active transport modality. Binding assays using recombinant importin a show an inter- action with NLD-I similar to that of SV40 large T antigen NLS. Deletion analysis indicates that both stretches of basic residues are necessary for binding to importin a. The above experimental results lead to the conclusion that importin a acts as cytoplasmic receptor for proteins characterized by a bipartite NLS signal that extends up to 37 residues. Keywords: heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein-I; polypyrimi- dine tract-binding protein; PTB; nuclear localization signal; importin a. Transport of proteins and RNA into and out of the nucleus occurs through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), which are plugged through the double membrane of the nuclear envelope [1,2]. Small molecules and ions may pass the NPC passively, while macromolecules larger than 40–45 kDa are actively transported through the NPC. The active nuclear import and export of proteins is mediated by specific amino- acid sequences that are referred as nuclear localization signals (NLSs) [3,4] and nuclear export signal (NESs) [5]. At least two different types of ÔclassicalÕ NLSs have been defined: a short stretch of basic amino acids, exemplified by the SV40 large T antigen NLS (T-ag P KKKRKV) [6] and a bipartite NLS composed of two stretches of basic amino acids separated by a spacer of 10–12 amino acids, exempli- fied by nucleoplasmin ( KRPAATKKAGQAKKKK). The two sets of basic residues of bipartite-type NLS are required for sufficient nuclear localization, while the spacer is mutant-tolerant in sequence [7]. NLSs are usually recog- nized by the heterodimeric import receptor complex com- prising importins a and b, also named karyopherins [8,9]. Importins a contain the NLS-binding site and importins b are responsible for the docking of the importin–substrate complex to the cytoplasmic side of the NPC and its subsequent translocation through the pore. Transfer through the pore of importin–NLS protein complex requires two additional soluble proteins, RanGTPase and nuclear transport factor-2 (NTF2) [1]. Once inside the nucleus, Ran-GTP binding to importin b causes the disso- ciation of the import complex and release of the cargo [10,11]. The directionality of the nuclear import is conferred by an asymmetric distribution of the GTP and GDP-bound forms of Ran between the cytoplasm and the nucleus, with the GTP-form predominant in the nucleus [12,13]. Based on the similarities of their primary structures, the importins a have been separated into three subfamilies, each of which shows distinct substrate specificity and differential expres- sion [14–16]. Importins a consist of two structural and functional domains, a short basic N-terminal importin b binding (IBB) domain, and a large NLS-binding domain comprising armadillo (Arm) repeats [17–19]. Crystal struc- tures of karyopherins a complexes with NLS peptide have revealed the determinants of specificity for the binding of NLS sequences [20–22]. A number of NLS sequences that do not conform to the classical NLS consensus motif have also been identified, such as the M9 sequence, present in the hnRNP A1, which is recognized by transportin (karyopherin-b2), rich in glycine rather than basic residues [23–25]. A unique signal, called KNS, which allows nuclear transport via a mechanism independent of soluble factors has also been described in the hnRNP type K [26]. These findings indicate that the most important level of control for nuclear protein transport is the targeting sequence. We have previously identified a novel bipartite NLS in the hnRNP type I protein [27], also known as polypyri- midine tract binding protein (PTB) [28,29], a member of the large set of RNA binding proteins, known as hnRNPs, that Correspondence to M. G. Romanelli, Department of Mother and Child, Biology and Genetics, University of Verona, Strada le Grazie 8, 37134 Verona, Italy. Fax: + 39 045 8027180, Tel.: + 39 045 8027182, E-mail: mromanelli@univr.it Abbreviations: NLS, nuclear localization signal; NLD-I, nuclear localization determinant type I; T-ag, SV40 large tumor antigen; hnRNP, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; NPC, nuclear pore complex; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PTB, polypyrimidine tract-binding protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein. (Received 10 January 2002, revised 10 April 2002, accepted 18 April 2002) Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 2727–2734 (2002) Ó FEBS 2002 doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02942.x have been implicated in mRNA maturation and transport [30,31]. In mammalian cells, hnRNPI/PTB functions as a splicing repressor [32,33], and mediates exon skipping of several genes, such as a-andb-tropomyosin premRNAs [34,35], neuron-specific exon in the c-src, c-aminobutyric acid A c2 receptor, clathrin light chain B, N-methyl- D - aspartate premRNA [36,37]. Interestingly, a PTB homo- logue, abundantly present in the brain and in some neural cell lines, known as neural PTB (nPTB), has been recently identified [38]. Such a protein interacts with neuron-specific RNA binding proteins that participate in the control of alternative splicing in neurons [39]. nPTB is 74% identical in amino-acid sequence to PTB and contains four unusual RNA recognition motif (RRM) domains, and a putative bipartite NLS near the N-terminus. HnRNP I localizes in HeLa cells both in the nucleoplasm and in a discrete perinucleolar structure [29,41]. We previously reported that the N-terminal sequence of hnRNP I/PTB contains a 60-amino-acid sequence that is both necessary and sufficient to target the protein to the nucleus [27]. The sequence, named nuclear localization determinant type I (NLD-I), is characterized by a NLS containing two clusters of basic amino acids (KR and KKFK) that resemble the nucleoplasmin bipartite signal, but are separ- ated by an unusually long stretch of 30 amino acids. Compared to that of hnRNP I, the nPTB bipartite NLS conserves the basic stretches whereas 14 residues differ in the 30-amino-acid spacer sequence. In the present work, we have characterized the NLD domain present in the neural counterpart of hnRNPI/PTB and investigated whether the hnRNPI/PTB import involves the karyopherin a/b pathway. We show that the hnRNP I NLD-I domain displays significant binding to importin a, which is diminished or eliminated by mutations in both basic stretches. The present data support the model for the recognition of bipartite NLS derived by crystallographic analysis. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Plasmid construction A plasmid containing the full length cDNA of human nPTB [39] was kindly provided by D. L. Black (Howard Hugnes Medical Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA). To generate fusion constructs with the green fluorescent protein (GFP), the nPTB entire coding region, or its fragments (Fig. 2), were obtained by PCR from the original cDNA. The forward and reverse primers used for PCR included SalI and BamHI restriction enzyme site at the 5¢ and 3¢ ends, respectively. The PCR products were digested with SalIand BamHIandclonedinframewitha5¢-GFP coding sequence into mammalian expression vector pEGFP-C1 (Clontech). To introduce deletions into the NLD-I sequence of nPTB we used a two-step PCR method. In the first step we used the following oligonucleotides: forward primer D11–13 (5¢-ATGGACGGAATCGTCACTGAAGTTGCAGTTA GAGGATCTGACGAACTACTCTCAGGC-3¢)and reverse primer R1 (5¢-ATTGGATCCTTATACACGAGA AGGAGCACC-3¢) to generate the pnPTB-NLD-I D11-13 mutant; forward primer F1 (5¢-GGCAGGCATTCAGTC GACATGGACGGAATCGTCACT-3¢) and reverse pri- mer D45-47 (5¢-TACACGAGAAGGAGCACCATCCA TTTTATCTTCTCCTTTACTATCATTACCATTGGCT GT-3¢) to generate the pnPTB-NLD-I D45–47; forward primer D11–13 and reverse primer D45–47 to generate the pnPTB-NLD-I D11–13; 45–47 mutant (the numbers indicate the residues deleted within nPTB amino-acid sequence). In the second PCR step, all the fragments were amplified with primers F1 and R2 that introduced the SalI and BamHI sites, respectively, and cloned in the pEGFP-C1 vector. The glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion system was used to generate chimeric proteins [42]. HnRNP I-NLD I, and mutants D11–13, D45–47, and D11–13; 45–47 frag- ments, previously cloned in a pA1-CAT vector [27,43], were amplified by PCR with oligonucleotides that introduced EcoRIandHindIII restriction sites, and ligated into a modified pGEX-5X-1 vector (Amersham Pharmacia Bio- tech) where the XhoI had been mutated in a HindIII site. Cell culture and transfection Adherent HeLa cells were maintained in exponential growth in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were grown on glass coverslips and transfected using Lipofectamine (Life Tech- nologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were washed with NaCl/P i and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in NaCl/P i at room temperature for 20 min. Cellular localization of the nPTB–GFP fusion proteins was examined under a fluores- cent microscope. Expression of fusion proteins in Escherichia coli The pGEX-NLD-I, pGEX-NLD-I D11–13, pGEX-NLD-I D45–47 and pGEX-NLD-I D11–13; 45–47 constructs were transformed into the Escherichiacoli strain BL 21(DE3). Cell culture and batch purification of the GST fusion proteins were performed essentially according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). All the proce- dures were carried out at 4 °C; 1 m M EGTA and 2 m M dithiothreitol were included in the buffers throughout the purification procedures. Recombinant GST proteins, after elution, were dialyzed at 4 °C against binding buffer (20 m M Hepes, 150 m M KOAc, 2 m M Mg (OAc) 2 ,2m M dithiothre- itol). The concentration of proteins was determined by the method of Bradford [44] using the Bio-Rad dye reagent (Bio- Rad) and BSA as standard. Protein samples were aliquoted, quick frozen in liquid N 2 andstoredat)80 °C. The E. coli strain BLR containing GST fusions of a functional SV40 large T antigen nuclear localization signal (Tag NLS) or an inverse version of Tag NLS (Tag NLSinv) were cultured, and the proteins were purified as described previously [45]. Nuclear import assay Digitonin permeabilized HeLa cells were prepared essen- tially as described by Adam et al. [46]. Cells grown on coverslips were permeabilized with 55 lgÆmL )1 digitonin (Sigma) in transport buffer (TB: 20 m M Hepes pH 7.3, 110 m M potassium acetate, 5 m M sodium acetate, 2 m M magnesium acetate, 1 m M EGTA, 2 m M dithiothreitol, 1 lgÆmL )1 each of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin A). 2728 M. G. Romanelli and C. Morandi (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 A standard 50-lg nuclear import assay was performed in transport buffer containing an energy-regenerating system (1 m M ATP, 0,5 m M GTP, 10 m M creatine phos- phate, and 0.4 UÆmL )1 creatine phosphokinase), 5 lgof GST fused proteins, and 30 lg of rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Promega) as a cytosol source. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 45 min at 30 °C. Where indicated, wheat germ agglutinin (WGA); Sigma) at 50 lgÆmL )1 ,or hexokinase at 100 UÆmL )1 and glucose at 10 m M ,were included. Import assays were terminated by washing the cellsincoldNaCl/P i followed by fixation in 2% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Immunofluorescence staining Fixed cells were permeabilized for 3 min in )20 °C acetone, washed with NaCl/P i and incubated for 40 min with primary antibody diluted in 3% BSA/NaCl/P i (1 : 100 monoclonal anti-GST Ig, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), washed in NaCl/P i and incubated for 40 min in 1 : 50 FITC-conjugated goat anti-(mouse IgG) Ig. Cells were finally washed with NaCl/P i , coated with 90% glycerol in NaCl/P i , and observed under a Leitz Orthoplan microscope with an epifluorescence attachment. In vitro binding assay The plasmid pRSET-hSRP1 containing a cDNA of human importin a [47] was used to produce a [ 35 S]methionine- labeled protein using the Promega TNT T7 Quick Coupled Translation System. Fifteen micrograms of GST–NLD-I or NLD-I mutants and 7 lg of GST–Tag NLS or GST– TagNLSinv were incubated with 40 lL of glutathione- agarose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in 0.5 mL of binding buffer (20 m M Hepes, pH 6.8, 150 m M KOAc, 2m M Mg (OAc) 2 ,2m M dithiothreitol, 0.1% Tween 20 for 2hat4°C. The beads were collected and washed three times with binding buffer. After washing, one-twentieth of the beads were removed and the amount of immobilized GST fusion proteins were analyzed by SDS/PAGE. The rest of the beads were incubated with 90 lLofin vitro translated importin reaction mixture for 4 h at 4 °C. The beads were then washed six times in binding buffer, boiled in 30 lLof sample buffer, and the immobilized proteins were resolved on a SDS/10% polyacrylamide gel. The 35 S-labeled importin bound to the GST fusion proteins was detected by fluoro- graphy using Amplify Reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). RESULTS The NLD-I of neuronal PTB is capable of targeting a heterologous protein to the nucleus In a previous study, we identified the sequence implicated in the nuclear transport of the human hnRNPI/PTB at the N-terminal of the protein [27]. This region, which we called NLD-I, extends in the first 60 amino acids, upstream to the RRM1 (Figs 1A). The sequence contains two short basic sequences (KR and KKFK) that resemble the SV40 T-ag NLS, separated by an unusual long spacer sequence of 30 amino acids. Both short basic sequence were necessary for transport and, taken alone, were not able to target the protein to the nucleus. Sequence comparisons among NLD-I and the N-terminal region of neural PTB and PTB homologues isolated from pig, rat, mouse and Xenopus show that the basic stretches are highly conserved in all the hnRNPI/PTB homologues, whereas the sequence of the spacer, that may vary from 29 to 33 amino acids, is less conserved (Fig. 1B). The nPTB NLD-I sequence is identical in human and mouse, whereas the variations in NLD-I sequence between human nPTB and hnRNPI/PTB far exceed that among PTBs from different vertebrates. In order to characterize the novel type of bipartite NLS we first examined the ability of the NLD-I motif of the neuronal PTB to target a heterologous protein to the nucleus. GFP–nPTB fusion proteins were constructed in which NLD-I motif was deleted from nPTB or was the only sequence fused to GFP. Following transfection with GFP constructs, HeLa cells were fixed and visualized by direct fluorescence (Fig. 2). GFP is a small protein (30 kDa) that can passively diffuse through the nuclear pores and does not produce a subcellular localization bias (Fig. 2A), whereas fusion of the entire nPTB ORF to GFP led to a peptide that accumulates exclusively in the nucleus (Fig. 2B). The first 60 amino acids corresponding to the NLD-I domain are necessary and sufficient to localize the fusion protein completely in the nucleus, as demonstrated by the pGFP- nPTBD60 construct that was confined to the cytoplasm, Fig. 1. Functional domains of the human hnRNPI/PTB protein. 4 (A) Diagrammatic representation of the human hnRNP I/PTB protein, with the four RNA recognition motifs (RRM1–4) and the nuclear localization determinant type I (NLD-I). (B) Amino acid alignment of the hnRNP-I NLD-I domain with homologous domains from human and mouse nPTB, and from mouse, rat, pig and Xenopus PTB. The basic clusters are in bold letters. Alignment was performed by CLUSTAL W program. Asterisks and dots show identical and similar amino acids, respectively. Ó FEBS 2002 Binding of importin a to hnRNP I bipartite NLS (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) 2729 whereas when the first 60 amino acids are fused to GFP (pGFP–nPTB60), the protein localized completely into the nucleus (Fig. 2D,C, respectively). Deletions of three amino acids, including a lysine in the first basic stretch (deletion Gly-Val-Lys in pGFP– nPTBD11–13) abolished the nuclear localization and left the fusion protein to diffuse passively through the nuclear pore (Fig. 2E). A similar cellular distribution was observed when a serine and two lysines were deleted in the second basic stretch (pGFP–nPTBD45–47) or when both type of deletions were present in the basic stretches (construct pGFP–nPTBD11–13; 45–47) (Fig. 2F,G). The above obser- vations indicated that the two basic motifs in NLD-I of nPTB are interdependently required for full nuclear local- ization of the chimeric protein. Similar results were previ- ously obtained with the NLD-I present in hnRNP I/PTB that differ from that of nPTB essentially in the spacer sequence (Fig. 1). These data show that the intervening sequence does not contribute to the nuclear localization and may be modified without effect on localization, as it has been shown for the bipartite NLS of nucleoplasmin [7]. Taken together, these results indicate that the identified NLS motif is a bona fide nuclear import signal for PTB like proteins. The NLS contained in the NLD-I is a new variant of bipartite NLS sequences. Nuclear import of GST–NLD-I is an energy-dependent process that requires soluble cytoplasmic factors and is inhibited by WGA Due to the fact that NLD-containing NLSs motifs 3 can be imported by different mechanisms [48], we have undertaken a study on the identification of the receptor pathway that mediates nuclear import of the PTB NLS. An in vitro nuclear transport assay was used in which the plasma membrane of HeLa cells was permeabilized with the weak nonionic detergent digitonin that leaves the nuclear envel- ope intact [46]. NLD-I motif was fused to a GST protein, that itself does not accumulate into the nucleus [49] (Fig. 3A). Nuclear transport of GST–NLD-I was examined in the presence of a transport buffer containing rabbit reticulocyte lysate as a source of cytosolic proteins and an ATP-regenerating system, to provide energy for transloca- tion. The subcellular distribution of the GST–NLD-I was determined by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using an antibody against GST. In such experiments, we Fig. 2. The NLD-I domain of nPTB directs the nuclear import of a heterologous protein. (A) Schematic representation of the nPTB regions used to produce GFP fusion proteins. Structural domains are diagrammed with shaded boxes representing the RRMs. Black boxes or black boxes interrupted by a white strip represent the basic stretches or the dele- ted sequences in the basic stretches, respect- ively, at the N-terminus of the protein. (B) Plasmids expressing the native GFP (a), GFP fused to the entire nPTB (b), the 60- amino-acid region at N-terminus of nPTB (c), or nPTB deleted of the first 60 amino acids (d), were transiently transfected, expressed in HeLa cells and visualized by fluorescent microscopy. Likewise, GFP fused to the 60-amino acid region containing deletions at amino acids 11–13 (e), or 44–47 (f), or both type deletions (g) were also expressed in HeLa cells. 2730 M. G. Romanelli and C. Morandi (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 found that GST–NLD-I was clearly visible within the nuclei in cells were the plasma membrane was permeabilized by digitonin, followed by incubation at 30 °Cfor45minwith rabbit reticulocyte lysate and an ATP energy-regenerating system (Fig. 3C). A similar distribution was observed for GST–TagNLS, which is transported to the nucleus by the conventional NLS-mediated nuclear protein import path- way utilizing Ran and the importin ab/heterodimer [45] (Fig. 3B). This accumulation is ATP dependent as no nuclear accumulation was observed when the permeabilized cells were incubated with hexokinase and glucose to deplete residual ATP, and when import assay was performed in the absence of an ATP-regenerating system (Fig. 3D). As expected, the transport reaction was also temperature- dependent; if the assay was carried out at 4 °C, no transport was observed (Fig. 3E), confirming the necessity of ATP hydrolysis for nuclear protein import. When permeabilized cells were preincubated in transport buffer containing 50 lgÆmL )1 WGA, a lectin that associates with glycosylated nucleoproteins and inhibits nuclear pore complex function, the nuclear accumulation of NLD-I was inhibited (Fig. 3F). To characterize the amino-acid sequence requirement for nuclear import, we examined whether amino-acid deletions into NLD-I would perturb import. When we used GST– NLD-ID11–13, GST–NLD-ID45–47, or GST–NLD-ID11– 13;45–47 as the cargo in different import assays, no transport in the nucleus was seen (Fig. 3G,H,J). NLD-I domain binds to importin a The previous data suggest that the import of the PTB NLS might be mediated by cytosol receptor like the importin a/b complex. The crystal structure of importin a reveals two NLS peptide binding pockets and the distance between the two binding sites allows a 10-residue spacer to link the two peptide segments [20,50]. Importin a binding to a bipartite signal with a spacer sequence longer than 30 amino acids have not been tested thus far. The unusual sequence of the PTB NLS raised the possibility that it might not be recognized directly by importin a. TotestifNLD-Iwouldbindtoimportina, we first performed a binding assay using in vitro translated importin a and recombinant GST–NLD-I fusion protein. The GST fusions with SV40 tag NLS (GST–NLS) and an inverse version of Tag NLS (GST–NLSinv) served as positive and negative controls, respectively, for the importin a binding. As shown in Fig. 4A, importin a is able to bind NLD-I (lane GST–NLD-I). To ascertain whether the amino acid that impaired nuclear transport in NLD-I deletion mutants, mediate the importin a binding, we tested importin a binding to NLD-I D11–13, NLD-ID45–47, or NLD-ID11– 13;45–47, expressed as GFP-fusions. All mutants showed no detectable or very weak binding to importin a (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that importin a binds to NLD–I by interaction to the residues of the two short basic stretches, when both basic stretches are present in the NLS sequence. DISCUSSION In this report, we have demonstrated that nuclear translo- cation of nPTB and hnRNPI/PTB occurs via a polybasic NLS sequence present in the N-terminus NLD-I motif. This sequence functions in the nuclear import of PTB-like proteins via an active energy-dependent process and binds to the importin a. PTB NLS shares common features with the known bipartite type NLSs; in fact, it contains two clusters of basic amino acids, a smaller one of two basic amino acids (KR) and a larger one with three basic amino acids in a group of five (KKFKG); both are essential for full nuclear localization and importin a binding. However, it Fig. 3. Nuclear import of NLD-I is an energy- dependent process inhibited by WGA. Digito- nin-permeabilized HeLa cells were incubated with GST, GST–TagNLS (a control for the conventional importin a/b mediated nuclear import pathway directed by SV40 NLS), GST–NLD-I, or mutated NLD-I and visual- ized by indirect immunofluorescence, using a GST monoclonal antibody. In vitro nuclear transport (see ÔMaterial and methodsÕ)was carried out in the presence of cytosol and an ATP-regenerating system (A–J). The effects on nuclear transport of the ATP-regenerating system omission (D), or 4 °C incubation (E), were examined. Transport studies were also carried out after preincubation with WGA (F). Images are representative of at least three independent experiments. Ó FEBS 2002 Binding of importin a to hnRNP I bipartite NLS (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) 2731 represents a novel member of bipartite signal because there are differences between the critical basic residues of NLS and the consensus sequences of other bipartite signals, and because the spacer between the basic motifs is unusually longer (30 amino acids) than that of other well characterized bipartite NLSs (Table 1). Searching SWISSPROT and standard databases by PROSITE, and analyzing data deposited at the PredictNLS server (http://maple.bioc. columbia.edu/predictNLS/) [56], we find that functional bipartite NLSs are characterized by an intervening region of different lengths, but not longer than 18 amino acids, like the human androgen receptor NLS motif [57]. In transfected cells, it has been shown that the segment spacer of nucleoplasmin bipartite NLS can be replaced by a sequence up to 20 alanine residues, without disrupting efficient nuclear import [8]. Recently, a bipartite NLS, containing a spacer between the basic motifs of 32 amino acids, has been functionally characterized in hypoxia inducible factors 1a [58]. We indicate a consensus sequence for bipartite long type NLS as KRx(30–32)K[K/R]xK, according to Cokol et al. [56]. Searching the PredictNLS database using this motif, we found 61 proteins, with a true nuclear protein percent of 83.6. Nuclear import of most proteins requires both impor- tins a and b, with importin a as the adapter between importin b and the cargo protein. Some proteins undergo nuclear import via direct binding to importin b without involvement of importin a. Our results suggest that nuclear import of PTB-like proteins, and probably of all the proteins that contain the NLD-I type NLS, is an energy- dependent process mediated by importin a. Deletions in the basic regions within the N-terminal domain of hnRNP I and nPTB inhibit nuclear import and/or accu- mulation and reduces importin a binding. This conclusion fits with the in vitro binding studies, which showed that the NLD-I domain binds strongly to importin a and the bind- ing is diminished or eliminated even if only one of the two basic stretches are mutated. The affinity of the importin- targeting sequence interaction is a critical parameter in determining transport efficiency [5]. This is the first study to demonstrate that importin a recognizes and binds an NLS sequence that extends up to 37 residues. The crystal structures of importin a [20–22,50] clearly reveal two distinct binding sites that can accommodate both essential elements of the bipartite NLS. The larger binding site is structured optimally for the recognition of five lysine or arginine residues, while the smaller binding site allows specific recognition of two basic residues, and the interac- tion is simultaneous at both sites. The distance between the two binding sites allow a 10-residue spacer to link the two peptide segments, while a shorter linker would impair the simultaneous binding of the two clusters. The smaller basic cluster is required to be upstream of the larger cluster. The Table 1. Bipartite type nuclear localization signal. The single-letter amino acid code is used. The bold letters indicate the two arms of basic residues of the bipartite NLS. aa, amino acids. Protein Bipartite NLS Reference Bipartite short type NLSs Nucleoplasmin KRPAATKKAGQAKKKKLDK [7] CBP80 a RRRHSDENDGGQPHKRRK [14] N1N2 b RKKRKTEEESPLKDKAKKSK [54] SW15 c KKYENVVIKRSPRKRGRPRK [55] Human IL 5 KKYIDGQKKKCGEERRRVNQ [51] Human RB KRSAEGSNPPKPLKKLR [52] Human p53 KRALPNNTSSSPQPKKKP [53] Consensus KK-10–12 aa -KKK RR RRR Bipartite long type NLSs HnRNPI/PTB_HUMAN KRGSDELFSTCVTNGPFIMSSNSASAANGNDSKKFKGDS [29] PTB_HUMAN KRGSDELLSGSVLSSPNSNMSSMVVTANGNDSKKFKGED [39] HIF1a d KRKMEHDGSLFQAUGIGTLLQQPDDHAATTSLSWKRVKG [58] Consensus KR-30–32 aa -K[K/R]XK a CAP-binding protein 80. b Xenopus laevis phosphoprotein. c S. cerevisiae transcription factor. d Hypoxia inducible factor 1a. Fig. 4. Binding of importin a to wild-type or mutated NLD-I. (A) Wild- type GST–NLD-I, or GST–NLS and GST–NLSinv, immobilized on glutathione sepharose 4B, were incubated with 90 lLofin vitro translated protein a labeled with [ 35 S]methionine for 4 h at 4 °C. The proteins were separated by SDS/10% PAGE gel, and bound importin a was analyzed by fluorography (upper panel). An amount repre- senting 1/20th of the beads incubated with GST fusion proteins, extensively washed, was resolved by SDS/PAGE and stained with Comassie-blue (lower panel, CB staining). (B) Binding of importin a was also analyzed using immobilized GST–NLD-I peptides mutated by deletions. The results are representative of two independent experiments. 2732 M. G. Romanelli and C. Morandi (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 spacing between a defined number of binding sites acts as molecular ruler that sets further constraints on target specificity. Binding properties of NLD-I type NLS to importin a are consistent with crystallographic structure of interaction with bipartite signal and further characterize the bipartite signals, confirming that the linker sequence does not contain a consensus, and may be as long as 30 amino acids. Mammalian paralogs of importin a have recently been discovered and six genes for importin a have been found in human. The importin a that we have used in our binding experiments (hSRP1a) represents one of the three sub- families of importins a [15]. Several experiments clearly support the hypothesis that importins a might be specialized in their efficiency to transport different nuclear proteins [59]. It will be interesting to analyze the binding specificity of the different types of importin a toNLD-INLSandtothe putative NLD-I type NLSs present in other nuclear proteins. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank Pamela Lorenzi for excellent technical help. We thank Michael F. Rexach for his generous gift of GST–NLS and GST– NLSinv constructs and Karsten Weis for his generous gift of pRSET- hSRP a plasmid. This work was supported by grants from Ministery of Scientific Research and Technology (ex 60%). REFERENCES 1. Gorlich, D. & Kutay, U. (1999) Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 15, 607–660. 2. Gant, T.M., Goldberg, M.W. & Allen, T.D. (1998) Nuclear envelope and nuclear pore assembly: analysis of assembly inter- mediates by electron microscopy. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 10, 409– 415. 3. Doye, V. & Hurt, E. (1997) From nucleoporins to nuclear pore complexes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 401–411. 4. Dingwall, C. & Laskey, R.A. (1991) Nuclear targeting sequences – a consensus? Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 478–481. 5. Jans, D.A., Xiao, C.Y. & Lam, M.H. (2000) Nuclear targeting signal recognition: a key control point in nuclear transport? Bioessays 22, 532–544. 6. Nigg, E.A. (1997) Nucleocytoplasmic transport: signals, mecha- nisms and regulation. Nature 386, 779–786. 7. Robbins, J., Dilworth, S.M., Laskey, R.A. & Dingwall, C. (1991) Two interdependent basic domains in nucleoplasmin nuclear tar- geting sequence: identification of a class of bipartite nuclear tar- geting sequence. Cell 64, 615–623. 8. Makkerh, J.P.S., Dingwall, C. & Laskey, R.A. (1996) Compara- tive mutagenesis of nuclear localization signals reveals the importance of neutral and acidic amino acids. Curr. Biol. 6, 1025– 1027. 9. Weis, K. (1998) Importins and exportins: how to get in and out of the nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 185–189. 10. Yoneda, Y. (2000) Nucleocytoplasmic protein traffic and its sig- nificance to cell function. Genes Cells 5, 777–787. 11. Bischoff, F.R. & Ponstingl, H. (1995) Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange of Ran by RCC1 and stimulation of hydro- lysis of Ran-bound GTP by Ran-GAP1. Methods Enzymol. 257, 135–144. 12. Izaurralde, E., Kutay, U., von Kobbe, C., Mattaj, I.W. & Gorlich, D. (1997) The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J. 16, 6535–6547. 13. Mattaj, I. & Englmeier, L. (1998) Nucleocytoplasmic transport: the soluble phase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 265–306. 14. Miyamoto, Y., Imamoto, N., Sekimoto, T., Tachibana, T., Seki, T., Tada, S., Enomoto, T. & Yoneda, Y. (1997) Differential modes of nuclear localization signal (NLS) recognition by three distinct classes of NLS receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26375–26381. 15. Kohler, M., Speck, C., Christiansen, M., Bischoff, F.R., Prehn, S., Haller,H.,Gorlich,D.&Hartmann,E.(1999)Evidencefordis- tinct substrate specificities of importin alpha family members in nuclear protein import. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7782–7791. 16. Nadler,S.G.,Tritschler,D.,Haffar,O.K.,Blake,J.,Bruce,A.G. & Cleaveland, J.S. (1997) Differential expression and sequence– specific interaction of karyopherin alpha with nuclear localization sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4310–4315. 17. Gorlich, D., Henklein, P., Laskey, R.A. & Hartmann, E. (1996) A 41 amino acid motif in importin-alpha confers binding to importin-beta and hence transit into the nucleus. EMBO J. 15, 1810–1817. 18. Moroianu, J., Blobel, G. & Radu, A. (1996) The binding site of karyopherin alpha for karyopherin beta overlaps with a nuclear localization sequence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6572–6576. 19. Peifer, M., Berg, S. & Reynolds, A.B. (1994) A repeating amino acid motif shared by proteins with diverse cellular roles. Cell 76, 789–791. 20. Conti, E., Uy, M., Leighton, L., Blobel, G. & Kuriyan, J. (1998) Crystallographic analysis of the recognition of a nuclear locali- zation signal by the nuclear import factor karyopherin alpha. Cell 94, 193–204. 21. Conti, E. & Kuriyan, J. (2000) Crystallographic analysis of the specific yet versatile recognition of distinct nuclear localization signals by karyopherin alpha. Struct. Fold Des. 8, 329–338. 22. Fontes, M.R.M., Teh, T. & Kobe, B. (2000) Structural basis of recognition of monopartite and bipartite nuclear localization sequences by mammalian importin-alpha. J. Mol. Biol. 297, 1183– 1194. 23. Bogerd, H.P., Benson, R.E., Truant, R., Herold, A., Phingbodhi- pakkiya, M. & Cullen, B.R. (1999) Definition of a consensus transportin-specific nucleocytoplasmic transport signal. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9771–9777. 24. Bonifaci, N., Moroianu, J., Radu, A. & Blobel, G. (1997) Kar- yopherin beta2 mediates nuclear import of a mRNA binding protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5055–5060. 25. Siomi, H. & Dreyfuss, G. (1995) A nuclear localization domain in the hnRNP A1 protein. J. Cell Biol. 129, 551–560. 26. Michael, W.M., Eder, P.S. & Dreyfuss, G. (1997) The K nuclear shuttling domain: a novel signal for nuclear import and nuclear export in the hnRNP K protein. EMBO J. 16, 3587–3598. 27. Romanelli, M.G., Weighardt, F., Biamonti, G., Riva, S. & Morandi, C. (1997) Sequence determinants for hnRNP I protein nuclear localization. Esp. Cell. Res. 235, 300–304. 28. Gil, A., Sharp, P.A., Jamison, S.F. & Garcia-Blanco, M.A. (1991) Characterization of cDNAs encoding the polypyrimidine tract- binding protein. Genes Dev. 5, 1224–1236. 29. Ghetti, A., Pinol-Roma, S., Michael, W.M., Morandi, C. & Dreyfuss, G. (1992) hnRNP I, the polypyrimidine tract-binding protein: distinct nuclear localization and association with hnRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3671–3678. 30. Krecic, A.M. & Swanson, M.S. (1999) hnRNP complexes: com- position, structure, and function. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 11, 363– 371. 31. Weighardt, F., Biamonti, G. & Riva, S. (1996) The roles of het- erogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNP) in RNA meta- bolism. Bioessays 18, 747–756. 32. Valcarcel, J. & Gebauer, F. (1997) Post-transcriptional regulation: the dawn of PTB. Curr. Biol. 7, 705–708. Ó FEBS 2002 Binding of importin a to hnRNP I bipartite NLS (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) 2733 33. Wagner, E.J. & Garcia-Blanco, M.A. (2001) Polypyrimidine tract binding protein antagonizes exon definition. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 3281–3288. 34. Mulligan, G.J., Guo, W., Wormsley, S. & Helfman, D.M. (1992) Polypyrimidine tract binding protein interacts with sequences involved in alternative splicing of beta-tropomyosin pre-mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25480–25487. 35. Gooding, C., Roberts, G.C. & Smith, C.W. (1998) Role of an inhibitory pyrimidine element and polypyrimidine tract binding protein in repression of a regulated alpha-tropomyosin exon. RNA 4, 85–100. 36. Chan, R.C. & Black, D.L. (1997) The polypyrimidine tract bind- ing protein binds upstream of neural cell-specific c-src exon N1 to repress the splicing of the intron downstream. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4667–4676. 37. Zhang, L., Liu, W. & Grabowski, P.J. (1999) Coordinate repres- sion of a trio of neuron-specific splicing events by the splicing regulator PTB. RNA 5, 117–130. 38. Ashiya, M. & Grabowski, P.J. (1997) A neuron-specific splicing switch mediated by an array of pre-mRNA repressor sites: evidence of a regulatory role for the polypyrimidine tract binding protein and a brain-specific PTB counterpart. RNA 3, 996–1015. 39. Markovtsov, V., Nikolic, J.M., Goldman, J.A., Turck, C.W., Chou, M.Y. & Black, D.L. (2000) Cooperative assembly of an hnRNP complex induced by a tissue-specific homolog of poly- pyrimidine tract binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 7463–7479. 40.Polydorides,A.D.,Okano,H.J.,Yang,Y.Y.L.,Stefani,G.& Darnell, R.B. (2000) A brain-enriched polypyrimidine tract- binding protein antagonizes the ability of Nova to regulate neu- ron-specific alternative splicing. Proc.NatlAcad.Sci.USA97, 6350–6355. 41. Matera, A.G., Frey, M.R., Margelot, K. & Wolin, S.L. (1995) A perinucleolar compartment contains several RNA polymerase III transcripts as well as the polypyrimidine tract-binding protein, hnRNP I. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1181–1193. 42. Smith, D.B. & Johnson, K.S. (1988) Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glu- tathione S-transferase. Gene 67, 31–40. 43. Weighardt, F., Biamonti, G. & Riva, S. (1995) Nucleo-cyto- plasmic distribution of human hnRNP proteins: a search for the targeting domains in hnRNP A1. J. Cell Sci. 108, 545–555. 44. Bradford, M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254. 45. Rexach, M. & Blobel, G. (1995) Protein import into nuclei: association and dissociation reactions involving transport sub- strate, transport factors, and nucleoporins. Cell 83, 683–692. 46. Adam, S.A., Marr, R.S. & Gerace, L. (1990) Nuclear protein import in permeabilized mammalian cells requires soluble cyto- plasmic factors. J. Cell Biol. 111, 807–816. 47. Weis, K., Mattaj, I.W. & Lamond, A.I. (1995) Identification of hSRP1 alpha as a functional receptor for nuclear localization sequences. Science 268, 1049–1053. 48. Deane, R., Shafer, W., Zimmermann, H.P., Mueller, L., Gorlich, D., Prehn, S., Ponstingl, H. & Bishoff, F.R. (1997) Ran-binding protein 5 (RanBP5) is related to the nuclear transport factor importin-beta but interacts differently with RanBP1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5087–5096. 49. Pollard, V.W.,Michael.W.M., Nakienly, S.,Siomi, M.C.,Wang,F. & Dreyfuss, G. (1996) A novel receptor-mediated nuclear protein import pathway. Cell 86, 985–994. 50. Dingwall, C. & Laskey, R.A. (1998) Nuclear import: a tale of two sites. Curr. Biol. 8, R922–R924. 51. Jans, D.A., Briggs, L.J., Gustin, S.E., Jans, P., Ford, S. & Young, I.G. (1997) A functional bipartite nuclear localisation signal in the cytokine interleukin-5. FEBS Lett. 406, 315–320. 52. Zacksenhaus, E., Bremner, R., Phillips, R.A. & Gallie, B.L. (1993) A bipartite nuclear localization signal in the retinoblastoma gene product and its importance for biological activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4588–4599. 53. Liang, S. & Clarke, M.F. (1999) A bipartite nuclear localization signal is required for p53 nuclear import regulated by a carboxyl- terminal domain. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32699–32703. 54. Hu, W. & Jans, D.A. (1999) Efficiency of importin alpha/beta- mediated nuclear localization sequence recognition and nuclear import. Differential role of NTF2. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15820– 15827. 55. Jans, D.A., Moll, T., Nasmyth, K. & Jans, P. (1995) Cyclin- dependent kinase site-regulated signal-dependent nuclear locali- zation of the SW15 yeast transcription factor in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17064–17067. 56. Cokol, M., Nair, R. & Rost, B. (2000) Finding nuclear localization signals. EMBO Reports 1, 411–415. 57. Jenster, G., Trapman, J. & Brinkmann, A.O. (1993) Nuclear import of the human androgen receptor. Biochem. J. 293, 761–768. 58. Luo, J.C. & Shibuya, M. (2001) A variant of nuclear localization signal of bipartite-type is required for the nuclear translocation of hypoxia inducible factors (1 alpha, 2 alpha and 3 alpha). Oncogene 20, 1435–1444. 59. Welch, K., Franke, J., Kohler, M. & Macara, I.A. (1999) RanBP3 contains an unusual nuclear localization signal that is imported preferentially by importin-alpha3. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 8400–8411. 2734 M. G. Romanelli and C. Morandi (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 . Importin a binds to an unusual bipartite nuclear localization signal in the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein type I Maria G. Romanelli and Carlo Morandi Department. heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein- I; polypyrimi- dine tract-binding protein; PTB; nuclear localization signal; importin a. Transport of proteins and RNA into and out

Ngày đăng: 18/03/2014, 01:20

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN