comparison of downer and riser flows in a circulating bed by means of optical fiber probe signals measurements

8 0 0
comparison of downer and riser flows in a circulating bed by means of optical fiber probe signals measurements

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Thông tin tài liệu

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 – 333            !"  #$"% % & %&'(%)       %  ))*   ))  %  +,  -&."                     /&0    &1#   21 )& *'  %* %*  %  )*          )  )*  )) 3  %%  )   %  4%  * /    5 %  ))   %   %' )  !  %       *&)* %     %  6  *       (%     & %6  *      &     &3  )    %5  3'       %  3*)       &     %)* 7%   %  &%   %& /            3' &% )%3 8 %))* 9! %  )* !   6%  ! "#:(; ; )); *  -   %5:#>$>; 3:#>$ $  ## : %?@7%  ) 1877-7058 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.420 G J de Castilho et al / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 – 333    %   %'  )  4A    *  %          %*     4%'   * / =4% & %   %*       *    )%5   4A %  * 3)*   *  =        BC  4   &4A )   )   &%         :      5      '       =%    )  &          D  & %)% 4  =%       4A  %   %  %  *%  &  %     %(  *      )%))  %)% %')&%   * =   % 3  BC &   %       * *      %   =% *     3 & )*%  * =   *5    )%    B>C&   5 )%     &  %  & *   * =  5           )%*  )&   )   %       4A /&         %    ) )        %  )5   )        *  * %)%*  =    3    ) *= %  )4 %5   0     1# &)  215   )    #  4  *#E1 F&-E$ / >5 )%  % '' &    *4A%%*& B&0C&            "  %  &  %  %&  %5  %  / ,=      /  )' 53%%  )%5= 3) ?   %  3 9  %  )*  =* )>>    G 2&>H) %         %          /   3     )  . E  #  1  . E # 1H 4    % )/ E & #& # & H#  1H#   3  D        % *   5 ) 327 328 G J de Castilho et al / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 – 333 %'+'1    2  34   *)   %      57% *        *     %          & 1    %      3*          %%        6    *& !    %     )*         &       '   *   *     %*&            )*       I! %    %   I& )*A  6 B#C   *&15= !5) %  )*I 3%9/   I&)*!%  BG&HC J   &      )        *             %       3                   %  *  ) *= %  ) 1     > 0 # G H 1 *    / ! + )% +K)% +K)% % ")%3 > 0 # G H 4 :! %  )%  5 )D     ! &&/   HG G0 G0 $G 0H G01 !%  *&4* 0 0 #G #G H>G 10 G J de Castilho et al / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 – 333   2   )         15 6  *!5& : 0'+'   #      9   %               *  %                   5%      % %  %)%  3*B1C 5         4 %    ' &  % %     &          3          "          &     %  )   &     3% )/E H#&     =%  %    5 % 15    %         & %)*   "    &? ?%  3 & %    * %   &            3'  &   3  5  3     %3 %)*%5%  ' %  %    3&              &      )             3 &       )/E !%B1&$C )   5   15  ) )%   )       &        &   %2  5%    %   )3     &   15&3%  &E  HG/  5  )3  )*   )    &  % )*     %)   4%&      &   15   %%  )            5    %&    %155) % % %  &    &  3           3' &)  5    %15 %     &    ' & %15   5  %) % =3%    3  5  )   *      &E 0H/  &E G01/ &    15 )/E  0'%'!      329 330 G J de Castilho et al / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 – 333 5  6  *   4 %>   &    ' !5 %     3' &3)     % *      &  % M  &  &   %!5   *%   )    2%      & !5  %                8/           1"                                   94                                                                     !%):             4 (      2.9   %'   ) 331 G J de Castilho et al / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 – 333 4& )   %!5 % &        )"  &    & )  )&!5    &  &E G0/ & 3 &  : )     &  )   = )&      5 *%    %    )      3' &!5 % * &  >H0>) )/E &#      &E $G/ !5 %  *)    & %      &      &        )  5    )3  )*3&      &%%  % %)%  3*   8/   # $   # $       1"                            # $   # $   94                                                                     !%):             4 >(  6  *6.9   %'   ) 332 G J de Castilho et al / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 – 333     5    %  3) )   )* % 6  *   %    15  *!5%   &  3  )   N  &   &% % 15 !5"   &3  )   3 5%%*)* "3&      3*  )              ) %         )   )%  5 ' %   %&       &                 2   %&     )  %       &%  &%)%      )     &    )  %' &  % )* )%3&   & /              15     &B=C #    &BOC !5 6  *&B)C &  &B/ C     &BC /  %&BC 4* % * &BC 3  &BC -   *&B/ >C G J de Castilho et al / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 –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© 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.420 G J de Castilho et al / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 326 – 333    %   %'  )   4A     *...  )%5    4A  %  * 3)*   *  =        BC  4   & 4A  )   ) ...   D  & %)% 4  =%        4A   %   %  %  *%  &

Ngày đăng: 01/11/2022, 09:14

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan