Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 355 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
355
Dung lượng
1,16 MB
Nội dung
Billing code 3510-33-P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 730, 732, 734, 736, 738, 740, 742, 743, 744, 746, 748, 750, 756, 758, 762, 764,
770, 772, and 774
[Docket No. 120403246-2657-01]
RIN 0694-AF65
Revisions totheExportAdministrationRegulations:InitialImplementationofExport
Control Reform
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: As part oftheExport Control Reform (ECR) Initiative, the Bureau of Industry
and Security (BIS), and the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), Department of State,
have published multiple proposed amendments totheExportAdministration Regulations (EAR)
and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), respectively, to strengthen national
security by fundamentally reforming theexport control system. This final rule implements the
initial ECR changes by adding a structure and related provisions to control munitions items that
the President has determined no longer warrant export control on the U.S. Munitions List (USML)
on the Commerce Control List (CCL), specifically aircraft, gas turbine engines, and related items.
This rule is being published in conjunction with a Department of State rule that revises the
USML so that upon the effective date of both rules, the USML and CCL and corresponding
regulatory structures will be complementary. Therevisions in this final rule are also part of
1
Commerce’s retrospective regulatory review plan under EO 13563, which Commerce completed
in August 2011.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE 180 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION IN FEDERAL REGISTER].
ADDRESSES: Commerce’s full plan can be accessed at:
http://open.commerce.gov/news/2011/08/23/commerce-plan-retrospective-analysis-existing-
rules.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions about the “600 series”
control structure or transition related questions, contact Hillary Hess, Regulatory Policy
Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, at 202-482-2440 or
rpd2@bis.doc.gov. For technical questions about the ECCNs included in this rule contact Gene
Christiansen, Office of National Security and Technology Transfer Controls, at 202-482-2984 or
gene.christiansen@bis.doc.gov. For questions about the definition of “specially designed,”
contact Timothy Mooney, Regulatory Policy Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of
Industry and Security, at 202-482-2440 or timothy.mooney@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule implements theinitial ECR changes by
adding a structure and related provisions to control munitions items that the President has
determined no longer warrant export control on the U.S. Munitions List (USML) on the
Commerce Control List (CCL). In addition to adding this control structure, this rule creates ten
new “600 series” Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) to control an initial tranche of
items moving from the USML tothe CCL: aircraft and gas turbine engines, related parts,
components, accessories, attachments, software, and technology.
2
This rule also adopts as much as possible a common definition of “specially designed” for
use under the EAR and the ITAR, along with other key terms used on the two control lists. In
addition, this rule addresses implementation issues related tothe transition of items from the USML
to the CCL, including the continued use of DDTC-issued licenses that include items transferred to
the CCL.
This rule implements changes that were proposed in five rules published between July 15, 2011
and June 21, 2012 under ECR. This rule is being published in conjunction with a Department of
State rule that revises the USML so that upon the effective date of both rules, the USML and
CCL and corresponding regulatory structures will be complementary.
Contents
I. TheExport Control Reform Initiative
A. Background
B. List of Proposed Rules
C. Relationship to Other Rules Implementing ECR
II. Addition ofthe “600 series” tothe CCL
A. General Structure
B. Reasons for Control
C. Items Paragraph
III. Transition
A. Delayed Effective Date
B. Amendment tothe EAR to Address Dual Licensing
C. Transition Period and General Order No. 5
IV. Retrospective Regulatory Review
3
V. Part 730 – General Information
VI. Part 732 – Steps for Using the EAR
VII. Supplement No. 3 to part 732 – Red Flags
VIII. Part 734 – Scope ofthe EAR
A. Dual Licensing
B. De Minimis
IX. Part 736 – General Prohibitions
A. Foreign-Produced Direct Product
B. General Order No.5
X. Part 738 – CCL Overview and the Country Chart
XI. Part 740 – License Exceptions
A. Restrictions
B. License Exception TMP
C. License Exception RPL
D. License Exception GOV
E. License Exception TSU
F. License Exception STA
G. Other License Exception STA Changes
H. Country Groups
XII. Part 742 – Control Policy
A. National Security (NS) Review Policy
B. Regional Stability (RS) License Requirements
C. RS Review Policy
4
XIII. Part 743 – Special Reporting
A. Conventional Arms
B. Major Defense Equipment
XIV. Part 744 – End-User and End-Use Controls
A. “Military End Use” in §§ 744.17 and 744.21
B. China Military End-Use Control
XV. Part 746 – Embargoes and Other Special Controls
A. Iraq
B. UN Embargoes
XVI. Part 748 – Applications and Documentation
A. Classification Requests to Confirm that Items are not “Specially Designed”
B. Unique Submission Requirements
XVII. Part 750 – Application Processing, Issuance, and Denial
A. Calculating Processing Times
B. Shipment to Approved End Users
C. Extended Validity
D. Specificity on Application
XVIII. Part 756 – Appeals
XIX. Part 758 – Export Clearance Requirements
A. Automated Export System (AES) Filing Regardless of Value, Except for .y Items
B. Furnishing of ECCNs to Consignees
C. Removal of Obsolete References in Revised Sections
XX. Part 762 – Recordkeeping
5
XXI. Part 764 – Foreign-Produced Direct Product and Denial Orders
XXII. Part 770 – Interpretations
XXIII. Part 772 – Definitions (including Specially Designed)
A. “Specially Designed” Definition
B. Other Definitions
XXIV. Part 774 – The Commerce Control List
A. Product Group Headings
B. ECCN 0A919
C. Aircraft and Related Items “600 series” ECCNs
D. Gas Turbine Engines and Related Items “600 series” ECCNs
E. 9Y018 ECCNs Rolled into “600 series”
F. Supplement Nos. 6 and 7 – Sensitive List and Very Sensitive List
G. Supplement No. 4 – Commerce Control List Order of Review
XXV. Procedural Amendment – Authority Citation Update
I. TheExport Control Reform Initiative
A. Background
The objective oftheExport Control Reform (ECR) Initiative is to protect and enhance
U.S. national security interests. President Obama directed theAdministration in August 2009 to
conduct a broad-based review ofthe U.S. export control system to identify additional ways to
enhance national security. In April 2010, then-Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, describing
the initial results of that effort, explained that fundamental reform ofthe U.S. export control
system is necessary to enhance national security. Once the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) and its U.S. Munitions List (USML) are amended so that they control only
6
the items that provide the United States with a critical military or intelligence advantage or
otherwise warrant such controls, and theExportAdministration Regulations (EAR) are amended
to control military items that do not warrant USML controls, the U.S. export control system will
enhance national security by (i) improving interoperability of U.S. military forces with allied
countries, (ii) strengthening the U.S. industrial base by, among other things, reducing incentives
for foreign manufacturers to design out and avoid U.S origin content and services, and (iii)
allowing export control officials to focus government resources on transactions that pose greater
concern.
On July 15, 2011, BIS published Proposed RevisionstotheExportAdministration
Regulations (EAR): Control of Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control
under the United States Munitions List (USML) (76 FR 41958) (hereinafter “July 15 (framework)
rule”). That rule proposed a regulatory framework to control items on the USML that, in
accordance with section 38(f) ofthe Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22 U.S.C. 2778(f)(1)),
the President determines no longer warrant export control under the AECA. These items would
be controlled under the EAR once the congressional notification requirements of section 38(f)
and corresponding amendments tothe ITAR (22 CFR parts 120-130) and its USML and the EAR
(15 CFR parts 730-774) and its Commerce Control List (CCL) are completed.
After the July 15 (framework) rule proposed this regulatory framework, BIS published
subsequent rules proposing specific changes tothe CCL, and to other parts ofthe EAR. Among
other rules, on June 21, 2012, BIS published Proposed RevisionstotheExportAdministration
Regulations: ImplementationofExport Control Reform; Revisionsto License Exceptions After
Retrospective Regulatory Review (77 FR 37524) (hereinafter “June 21 (transition) rule”). That
rule proposed, inter alia, establishing a general order to facilitate the transition from ITAR to
7
EAR licensing jurisdiction and broadening certain EAR license exceptions and licensing
procedures to ensure they are not more restrictive than comparable ITAR exemptions and
approvals.
This final rule implements ECR by finalizing the provisions contained in five proposed
rules published between July 15, 2011 and June 21, 2012, which adds tothe CCL military
aircraft, military gas turbine engines, and related items that the President has determined no
longer warrant export control on the USML. The Department of State made the congressional
notification required by Section 38(f) ofthe AECA for removal of these items from the USML.
The majority oftherevisions in this rule are specific tothe munitions items that are transferred
from the USML tothe CCL; however, many revisions also affect items or transactions that were
already subject tothe EAR prior tothe effective date of this rule.
Rather than adding a new paragraph to § 734.3 for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF), as proposed, BIS is adding a note to section 734.3(b)(1)(i) to
clarify the delegations of authority between the Departments of State and Justice with respect to
defense articles identified on the USML in the ITAR and the United States Munitions Import
List (USMIL). BIS received no comments from the public on this issue. BIS does not believe
that this change is substantive; rather it more accurately reflects the relationship between the
USML in the ITAR and the United States Munitions Import List.
B. List of Proposed Rules
This rule implements amendments tothe EAR proposed in the following five rules
published between July 15, 2011 and June 21, 2012 under ECR:
8
• Proposed RevisionstotheExportAdministration Regulations (EAR): Control of
Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control Under the United
States Munitions List (USML), (, 76 FR 41958, July 15, 2011) (RIN 0694-AF17)
(“July 15 (framework) rule”);
• RevisionstotheExportAdministration Regulations (EAR): Control of Aircraft
and Related Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control Under
the United States Munitions List (USML), (76 FR 68675, November 7, 2011)
(RIN 0694-AF36) (“November 7 (aircraft) rule”);
• RevisionstotheExportAdministration Regulations (EAR): Control of Gas
Turbine Engines and Related Items the President Determines No Longer Warrant
Control Under the United States Munitions List (USML), (76 FR 76072,
December 6, 2011) (RIN 0694-AF41) (“December 6 (gas turbine engines) rule”);
• “Specially Designed” Definition, (77 FR 36409, June 19, 2012) (RIN 0694-
AF66) (“June 19 (specially designed) rule”); and
• Proposed RevisionstotheExportAdministrationRegulations:Implementationof
Export Control Reform; Revisionsto License Exceptions After Retrospective
Regulatory Review, (77 FR 37524, June 21, 2012) (RIN 0694-AF65) (“June 21
(transition) rule”).
C. Relationship to Other Rules Implementing ECR
This final rule is published concurrently with the Department of State final rule,
Revisions tothe International Traffic in Arms Regulations:InitialImplementationofExport
Control Reform. BIS anticipates additional final rules will be published concurrently by both
agencies moving additional munitions items from the USML tothe CCL, once the notification
9
process is completed in accordance with section 38(f) ofthe AECA and subsequent USML
categories and the corresponding Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) are published
in final form.
II. Addition ofthe “600 Series” tothe CCL
In the July 15 (framework) rule, BIS proposed to add a new “xY6zz” control series tothe
CCL. This series, known as the “600 series,” would control most items formerly on the USML
that move tothe CCL and would consolidate the thirteen existing Wassenaar Arrangement
Munitions List (WAML) entries (i.e., those entries currently under “xY018”). In implementing
the “600 series” in this rule, as discussed below, BIS took into account comments related tothe
function and structure ofthe “600 series” submitted under all prior proposed rules issued as part
of ECR that would move items from the USML tothe CCL. These rules are:
• RevisionstotheExportAdministration Regulations (EAR): Control of Military
Vehicles and Related Items That the President Determines No Longer Warrant
Control on the United States Munitions List, (76 FR 76085, December 6, 2011);
• RevisionstotheExportAdministration Regulations (EAR): Control of Vessels of
War and Related Articles the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control
Under the United States Munitions List (USML), (76 FR 80282, December 23,
2011);
• RevisionstotheExportAdministration Regulations (EAR): Control of
Submersible Vessels, Oceanographic Equipment and Related Articles That the
President Determines No longer Warrant Control Under the United States
Munitions List (USML) (76 FR 80291, December 23, 2011);
10
[...]... other types of items subject tothe EAR” to reflect the scope of items subject toexport controls under the EAR Similarly, the revised text notes that while the term “dual use” is often used to describe the types of items subject tothe EAR, more precisely, any item that is not exclusively controlled for export or reexport by another agency ofthe U.S Government or excluded from the EAR pursuant to. .. described the grandfathering of DDTC licenses and agreements, the use of BIS authorizations, and the submission of disclosures to BIS and DDTC related tothe transition of items from the USML tothe CCL In response tothe proposed general order, BIS received public comments regarding: the timing for submitting a license application to BIS, clarification of when to submit a disclosure to BIS and when to submit... will be able to choose whether to use a DDTC or BIS authorization so long as the export, reexport, or in-country transfer meets the applicable requirements described herein In accordance with new § 120.5(b) ofthe ITAR, § 734.3(e) authorizes the export, reexport or in-country transfer of items subject tothe EAR when the items subject tothe EAR will be used in or with items subject tothe ITAR and... 120.5(b) ofthe ITAR DDTC added § 120.5(b) tothe ITAR on [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION].) Under this provision, DDTC has discretion in determining whether the requirements of § 120.5 have been met and whether items subject tothe EAR should be authorized under a license, agreement, or other approval by DDTC To provide guidance on the use of § 120.5(b) ofthe ITAR, items subject tothe EAR may be exported,... from BIS for theexportofthe part or component Since the number of authorizations would remain the same, this scenario would not be eligible for the provision described above Section 734.3(e) authorizes the export, reexport or in-country transfer of items subject tothe EAR when those items are subject to licenses, agreements, or other approvals issued by DDTC to authorize items subject tothe EAR that... any export, reexport, or in-country transfer of an item subject tothe EAR that is outside the scope ofthe LOA or DSP-94 must adhere tothe requirements ofthe FMS case In addition, no separate authorization from BIS is required to supplement actions taken on FMS cases by the Department of State’s Office of Regional Security and Arms Transfers (RSAT) Questions regarding §§ 120.5(b) or 126.6(c) of the. .. State the authority to license or otherwise authorize the export, reexport or in-country transfer of items otherwise subject tothe EAR, as agreed upon by the Secretaries of State and Commerce (Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013, Administrationof Reformed Export Controls, 78 FR 16129, March 13, 2013) The items will remain subject tothe EAR, and BIS will continue to maintain jurisdiction for licensing... being added tothe EAR in this final rule BIS did not adopt any ofthe other recommendations concerning the red flags for the following reasons Generalizing red flags 13 and 14 to apply tothe entire EAR would dilute their effect in highlighting the military nature ofthe “600 series” items and the precautions appropriate for such items, including the various provisions being added tothe EAR in this... regarding the earliest date that BIS will accept license applications for items moving from the USML tothe 22 CCL under this final rule and under future final rules For those wishing toexport under the authority ofthe EAR as soon as possible for items moving from the USML tothe CCL, applicants may submit license applications immediately after the publication ofthe final rule adding such items to the. .. security objectives ofthe reform effort as set forth above With respect to MT controls, the Departments of Defense, State, and Commerce have reviewed the USML to determine which items are currently subject to MT controls As mentioned, BIS will continue to review the CCL to make the entries more clear and positive, including reviewing the scope of controls on items subject tothe EAR The United Nations .
delegated to the Secretary of State the authority to license or otherwise authorize the export,
reexport or in-country transfer of items otherwise subject to the. BIS published Proposed Revisions to the Export Administration
Regulations: Implementation of Export Control Reform; Revisions to License Exceptions After