Logic, methodology and philosophy of science VIII proceedings of the eighth international congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science, and philosophy of science proceedings) ( PDFDrive ) 97

78 P GARDENFORS F~LLESDAL, D., 1979, Some ethical aspects of recombinant D N A research, Social Science Information 18, pp 401-419 GARDENFORS, P., 1979; Forecasts, deckions and uncertain probabilities, Erkenntnis 14, pp 159-181 GARDENFORS, P and SAHLIN, N.-E., 1982, Unreliable probabilities, risk taking, and decision making, Synthese 53, pp 361-386 GOOD,I.J., 1967, On the principle of total evidence, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17, pp 319-321 GRAHAM, L.R., 1979, Concerns about science and attempts to regulate inquiry, in G Holton and R.S Morison, eds., Limits of Scientific Inquiry (Norton, New York), pp 1-21 JENSEN,A.R., 1969, How much can we boast I Q and scholastic achievement, Harvard Educational Review 39, 1-123 JENSEN,A.R., 1972, Genetics and Education (Harper and Row, New York) KANT,I., 1%3, What is Enlightenment?, trans Lewis White Beck, in Kant, On History (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis) MORISON,R.S., 1979, Misgivings about life-extending technologies, in: G Holton and R.S Morison, eds., Limits of Scientific Inquiry (Norton, New York), pp 211-226 I., 1980, Genetic engineering and the recombinant D N A debate: a case study in PETERSSON, the responsibiliry of the scientist, Stockholm Papers in History and Philosophy of Technology, Report TRITA-HOT-1002 SINSHEIMER, R.L., 1976, Comments, Hastings Center Report SINSHEIMER, R.L., 1979, Thepresumptions of science, in: G Holton and R.S Morison, eds., Limits of Scientific Inquiry (Norton, New York), pp 23-35 THOMAS, L., 1977, Notes of a biology-watcher:the hazards of science, New England Journal of Medicine 296, pp 324-328