Economic growth and economic development 398

Introduction to Modern Economic Growth the previous section However, we not need to appeal to these theorems since in this together case it is straightforward to show the equivalence of the two problems To this, let us once again set up the current-value Hamiltonian, which in this case takes the form ˆ (k, c, µ) = u (c (t)) + µ (t) [f (k (t)) − (n + δ)k (t) − c (t)] , H with state variable k, control variable c and current-value costate variable µ As noted in the previous chapter, in the relevant range for the capital stock, this problem satisfies all the assumptions of Theorem 7.14 Consequently, the necessary conditions for an optimal path are: ˆ c (k, c, µ) = = u0 (c (t)) − µ (t) , H ˆ k (k, c, µ) = −µ˙ (t) + (ρ − n) µ (t) = µ (t) (f (k (t)) − δ − n) , H lim [exp (− (ρ − n) t) µ (t) k (t)] = t→∞ Repeatingthe same steps as before, it is straightforward to see that these optimality conditions imply c˙ (t) = (f (k (t)) − δ − ρ) , c (t) εu (c (t)) which is identical to (8.20), and the transversality condition Z t ảá (f (k (s)) δ − n) ds = 0, lim k (t) exp − t→∞ which is, in turn, identical to (8.11) This establishes that the competitive equilibrium is a Pareto optimum and that the Pareto allocation can be decentralized as a competitive equilibrium This result is stated in the next proposition: Proposition 8.1 In the neoclassical growth model described above, with Assumptions 1, 2, and 4’, the equilibrium is Pareto optimal and coincides with the optimal growth path maximizing the utility of the representative household 8.4 Steady-State Equilibrium Now let us characterize the steady-state equilibrium and optimal allocations A steady-state equilibrium is defined as in Chapter as an equilibrium path in which 384