An Update on Cold-formed Steel Framing Standards Development in t

Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Specialty Conference on ColdFormed Steel Structures (2004) - 17th International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures Oct 26th, 12:00 AM An Update on Cold-formed Steel Framing Standards Development in the United States Jay W Larson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/isccss Part of the Structural Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Larson, Jay W., "An Update on Cold-formed Steel Framing Standards Development in the United States" (2006) International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/isccss/17iccfss/17iccfss-session6/1 This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine It has been accepted for inclusion in International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine This work is protected by U S Copyright Law Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder For more information, please contact scholarsmine@mst.edu Seventeenth International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures Orlando, Florida, U.S.A, November 4-5, 2004 An Update on Cold-Formed Steel Framing Standards Development in the United States Jay W Larson, P.E., F.ASCE Abstract The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) helps turn state-of-the research into industry practice by serving as an ANSI-accredited standards development organization Its Committee on Framing Standards (COFS) has as its mission to eliminate regulatory barriers and increase the reliability and cost competitiveness of cold-formed steel framing through improved design and installation standards This relatively new organization published four new standards in 2001, addressing General Provisions, Truss Design, Header Design, and a Prescriptive Method for One and Two Family Dwellings In 2004, the COFS will update each of these existing standards and complete two new standards addressing Lateral Design and Wall Stud Design The COFS is also facilitating the development of a Code of Standard Practice for the Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing Industry This paper provides an overview of these significant documents and describes the ongoing work of the committee Director, Construction Standards Development, AISI 479 480 Introduction The efforts of AISI in standards development began with the sponsorship of research at Cornell University under the direction of Professor George Winter and the first publication of the AISI Specification in 1946 This initial work was started because "the acceptance and the development of cold-formed steel construction in the United States faced difficulties due to the lack of an appropriate design specification Various building codes made no provisions for cold-formed steel construction at that time" (Yu et aI., 1996) AISI has continued its efforts in this area, with a very significant activity being the improvement of the Specification (AISI, 2001a) through ongoing investments in research and development In 1997, the AISI Construction Marketing Committee authorized the formation of the Committee on Framing Standards (COFS) This was done due to the "increased interest in cold-formed steel for residential and light commercial framing" and the sense that "there were a number of design issues that were not adequately addressed for this emerging market (Bielat and Larson, 2002) The COFS established as its mission: "To eliminate regulatory barriers and increase the reliability and cost competitiveness of cold-formed steel framing in residential and light commercial building construction through improved design and installation standards." The committee also established as its primary objective: "To develop and maintain consensus standards for cold-formed steel framing, manufactured from carbon or low alloy flat rolled steel, that describe reliable and economical design and installation practices for compliance with building code requirements." The COFS organized itself under the same ANSI-approved operating procedures that govern the Committee on Specifications These procedures provide for balance between producer, user and general interest categories; voting, including the resolution of negatives; public review, interpretations and appeals Numerous task groups have been added under various subcommittees; however, the main committee always maintains control of all decisions through the balloting process In its first few years, the COFS accomplished many things The committee established subcommittees and task groups, recruited active members and conducted many meetings By 2001, the COFS had completed four standards for cold-formed steel framing; namely, General Provisions (AISI, 2001b), Truss 481 Design (AISI, 2001c), Header Design (AISI, 2001d), and a Prescriptive Method for One and Two Family Dwellings (AISI, 2001e) In 2003, a Commentary to the Prescriptive Method, including design examples, was completed (AISI, 2003) By no means has the COFS completed its mission It continues to improve the existing standards In 2002 it began working on standards for Wall Stud Design and Lateral Design, and began leading an effort to develop an industry Code of Standard Practice Existing Standards General Provisions The General Provisions standard addresses those things that are common to prescriptive and engineered design It provides a link between all Of the industry stakeholders and code enforcement agencies, ensuring everyone is "on the same page" with respect to the basic requirements of cold-formed steel framing It provides general requirements for material, corrosion protection, products, member design, member condition, installation, and connections There are two significant changes that will be included in the 2004 edition of the General Provisions standard; cutting and cut edge protection, and alignment framing tolerances In the section on materials, the standard will now state, "Additional corrosion protection is not required on edges of metallic-coated steel framing members, shop or field cut, punched or drilled." And, in the section on cutting and patching the standard will require that "All cutting of framing members be done by sawing, abrasive cutting, shearing, plasma cutting or other approved methods." These two provisions really go hand-in-hand, and recognize zinc's ability to galvanically protect steel at cut edges when proper cutting techniques are employed (AISI, 1996) The second change is in the section on alignment framing tolerances Based on testing at the University of Waterloo (Fox, 2003), an additional limitation will be added to address those cases where the bearing stiffener is located on the backside of the floor joist The previous limitation alone, that "each joist, rafter truss and structural wall stud shall be aligned vertically so that the centerline (mid width) is within 3/4 inch (19 mm) of the centerline (mid width) of the load 482 bearing member beneath", could result in a significant misalignment in the load path, as shown in Figure Top stud Bearing Stiffener Track Figure 1: Potential Misalignment in Load Path The new limitation will prescribe a maximum distance of 118 inch (3 rom) from the web of the horizontal framing member to the edge of the vertical framing member, as well, when a bearing stiffener is located on the backside of the horizontal framing member Truss Design The Truss Design standard applies to cold-formed steel trusses used for load carrying purposes in buildings Without such a document, our industry would be at a significant disadvantage with respect to competitive materials The standard is not just for design It also applies to manufacturing, quality criteria, installation and testing as they relate to the design of cold formed steel trusses The requirements of the truss standard apply to both generic C-section trusses, as well as the various proprietary truss systems and were developed, in part, based on extensive research at the University of Missouri-Rolla For the 2004 edition, the Truss Standard will be revised to recognize the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) method This was not included in the previous edition because the industry is still heavily rooted in Allowable Strength Design (ASD) However, with the elimination of the 113 stress increase 483 from ASD, the industry feels that there may now be compelling reasons to use LRFD Header Design The Header Design standard is aimed at giving design professionals the tools they need to design headers over door and window openings in buildings The design methodologies are based on testing at the NAHB Research Center, the University of Missouri-Rolla and industry, and were developed under the guidance of Dr Roger LaBoube of the University of Missouri-Rolla The Header Design standard provides general, design and installation requirements The only substantive change to the Header Standard for 2004 is the addition of single L-headers, shown in Figure Based on testing at the NAHB Research Center, single L-headers will be allowed for openings up to feet wide The design methodology is very similar to that for double L-headers (LaBoube, 2003), except specific limitations are defined based on what was tested Figure 2: Single L-Header Prescriptive Method The Prescriptive Method for One- and Two-Family Dwellings is essentially an updated version of previous building code submittals The document has gone through the rigorous consensus process, earning it ANSI recognition, giving it 484 instant credibility and making it easily accepted by the various building codes The standard incorporates the latest cost saving developments of the Steel Framing Alliance, such as the L-header, coupled with the latest engineering and load combination developments, such as the LRFD provisions of the AISI Specification Significant changes approved for 2004 include a typical wall-to-floor connection detail, a change to the provisions to allow direct connection of wall track to floor sheathing, based on testing at the NAHB Research Center (NAHB, 2003), details to illustrate the various ceiling joist top flange bracing options, including new provisions for using cold-rolled channel or hat channel, and a detail for connecting an uplift strap to a back-to-back header New Standards Wall Stud Design The Wall Stud Design standard will address general requirements, loading, design and installation of cold-formed steel wall studs It will address certain items not presently covered by the AISI Specification, including load combinations specific to wall studs, a new, more rational approach for sheathing braced design, and methodologies for evaluating stud-to-track connections and deflection track connections (Note: It is intended that the sheathing braced design provisions currently in section D4.1 of the AISI Specification would be eliminated.) Included in the Wall Stud Design standard is a requirement that when sheathing braced design is used, the wall stud shall be evaluated without the sheathing bracing for the dead loads and loads that may occur during construction or in the event that the sheathing has been removed or has accidentally become ineffective The load combination is taken from ASCE 7-02 (ASCE, 2002) for special event loading conditions Sheathing braced design in the Wall Stud Design standard is based on rational analysis assuming that the sheathing braces the stud at the location of each sheathing-to-stud fastener location Axial load in the stud is limited, therefore, by the capacity of the sheathing or sheathing-to-wall stud connection Provisions are provided for the stud-to-track connection, and recognize that when the track thickness is equal to or greater than the stud thickness,an 485 increase in web crippling strength can be realized This increased strength is attributed to the favorable synergistic effect of the stud-to-track assembly The provisions are based on research conducted at the University of Waterloo (Fox and Schuster, 2000) and the University of Missouri-Rolla (Bolte, 2003) Provisions are also provided for a C-section wall stud installed in a single deflection track application Lateral Design The Lateral Design standard will address general and design requirements for walls and diaphragms that provide lateral support to a building structure This standard will address design requirements for shear walls (Type or segmented and Type or perforated), diagonal strap bracing (that is part of a structural wall), wall anchorage and diaphragms Presently, these requirements are scattered among various building code provisions, design guides, technical notes and research reports The intent of this document is to pull them together into one document that is recognized by the codes A companion Commentary is also being developed to help provide further technical substantiation of the provisions The requirements for Type I shear walls in the Lateral Design standard were based on studies by Serrette (1996, 1997, 2002) This series of investigations included reverse cyclic and monotonic loading and led to the development of the design values and details for plywood, oriented strand board, and gypsum wallboard lightweight shear wall assemblies The requirements for Type II shear walls, also known as perforated shear walls, in the Lateral Design standard were based on recognized provisions for wood systems Research by Dolan (1999, 2000a, 2000b) demonstrated that the design procedure is as valid for steel framed systems as for all wood systems Also to be included in the Lateral Design standard are new provisions for estimating the deflection of Type I shear walls This method considers the bending, overturning, shear and inelastic effects and is based on a recent study at the University of Santa Clara (Serrette and Chau, 2003) Design values for diaphragms with wood sheathing were developed by Serrette (LGSEA, 1998), as was the methodology for determining the design deflection of diaphragms, which was based on a comparison of the equations used for 486 wood frame shear walls and diaphragms, coupled with similarities performance of cold-formed steel and wood frame shear walls In the Code of Standard Practice The COFS began development of an industry Code of Standard Practice for the Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing Industry in 2002 It will cover general requirements, classification of materials, plans and specifications, erection and installation drawings, materials, manufacture and delivery, erection and installation, quality control, and contractual relations This document is being developed by the COFS and is being reviewed by several peer committees within the industry It will define and set forth accepted norms of good practice for fabrication, installation and erection of cold-formed steel structural framing It is not intended to conflict with or supercede any legal building regulations, but serves to supplement and amplify such laws and is intended to be used unless there are differing instructions in the contract documents Other industries have such documents This one is being patterned after these other documents, but is being tailored to the needs of our industry Conclusions The American Iron and Steel Institute has effectively leveraged its experience and expertise in standards development to support the growing needs of the cold-formed steel framing industry Charged with a mission, to eliminate regulatory barriers and increase the reliability and cost competitiveness of coldformed steel framing through improved design and installation standards, the Committee on Framing Standards has built on the internationally recognized AISI Specification and has already developed and published four ANSIaccredited consensus standards Topics include General Provisions, Truss Design and Header Design, as well as a comprehensive Prescriptive Method for One and Two Family Dwellings In 2004, these ANSI-accredited documents will be updated In addition, new standards on Wall Stud Design and Lateral Design will be introduced, as well as an industry Code of Standard Practice These documents are expected to have widespread application and building code acceptance in the very near future 487 The COFS documents are readily available from the American Iron & Steel Institute (www.steel.org) and the Steel Framing Alliance (www.steelframingalliance.com) Acknowledgements The members of the committee, subcommittees and task groups responsible for bringing these standards to fruition are to be commended for their time and effort It is through the participation of representatives from steel producers, fabricators, users, educators, researchers, and building code officials in this consensus process that such progress is made The partner organizations, Steel Framing Alliance, Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association, Steel Stud Manufacturers Association, Canadian Sheet Steel Building Institute and Center for Cold Formed Steel Structures, are to be thanked for their active participation Particular gratitude is owed to the American Iron & Steel Institute and the Steel Framing Alliance, and their members, for their long-term vision for this market and financial support of this technical effort References Yu, W.W., Wolford, D.S., Johnson, A.L (1996), Golden Anniversary of the AISI Specification, Proceedings of the 13 th International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, St Louis, MO, 1996 American Iron and Steel Institute (1996), Durability of Cold-Formed Steel Framing Members, Washington, D.C., 1996 American Iron and Steel Institute (2001a), North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, Washington, D.C., 2001 American Iron and Steel Institute (2001 b), Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing - General Provisions, Washington, D.C., 2001 American Iron and Steel Institute (200Ic), Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing- Truss Design, Washington, D.C., 2001 American Iron and Steel Institute (200Id), Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing - Header Design, Washington, D.C., 2001 488 American Iron and Steel Institute (2001e), Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing - Prescriptive Method for One and Two Family Dwellings, Washington, D.C., 2001 American Iron and Steel Institute (2003), Commentary to the Standard for ColdFormed Steel Framing - Prescriptive Method for One and Two Family Dwellings, Washington, D.C., 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers (2002), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE Standard 7-02, Reston, VA, 2002 Bielat, K.R., Larson, J.W (2002), AISI Committee on Framing Standards Enabling the Widespread and Economic Use of Steel Framing, Proceedings of the 16th International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, St Louis, MO, 2002 Bolte, W G (2003), "Behavior of Cold-Formed Steel Stud-to-Track Connections", Thesis in partial fulfillment of the degree Masters Science, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO, 2003 Dolan, J.D (1999), "Monotonic and Cyclic Tests of Long Steel-Frame Shear Walls with Openings," Report No TE-1999-001, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA Dolan, J.D., and Easterling, W.S (2000a), "Monotonic and Cyclic Tests of Light-Frame Shear Walls with Various Aspect Ratios and Tie-Down Restraints," Report No TE-2000-001, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA Dolan, J.D., and Easterling, W.S (2000b), "Effect of Anchorage and Sheathing Configuration on the Cyclic Response of Long Steel-Frame Shear Walls," Report No TE-2000-002, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA Fox, S.R (2003), "The Strength of Stiffened CFS Floor Joist Assemblies with Offset Loading," American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, DC Fox, S R., and Schuster, R (2000), "Lateral Strength of Wind Load Bearing Wall Stud-to-Track Connections," Proceedings of the 15 th International 489 Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, University of MissouriRplla, Rolla, MO, 2000 LaBoube, R.A (2003), "Summary Report on Strength of Single L-Headers," American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, DC, 2003 Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association (1998), Lateral Load Resisting Elements: Diaphragm Design Values, Tech Note 558b-I, Washington, DC, 1998 NAHB Research Center (2003), "Hybrid Wood and Steel Sole Plate Connection Walls to Floors Testing Report", U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, 2003 Serrette, R.L (1996), "Shear Wall Values for Light Weight Steel Framing," Final Report, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA Serrette, R.L (1997), "Additional Shear Wall Values for Light Weight Steel Framing," Final Report, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA Serrette, R.L (2002), "Performance of Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Shear Walls: Alternative Configurations," Final Report: LGSRG-06-02, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA Serrette, R.L., and Chau, K (2003), "Estimating the Response of Cold-Formed Steel-Frame Shear Walls," Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA ... investments in research and development In 1997, the AISI Construction Marketing Committee authorized the formation of the Committee on Framing Standards (COFS) This was done due to the "increased interest... of the General Provisions standard; cutting and cut edge protection, and alignment framing tolerances In the section on materials, the standard will now state, "Additional corrosion protection... significant disadvantage with respect to competitive materials The standard is not just for design It also applies to manufacturing, quality criteria, installation and testing as they relate to the