Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 221 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
221
Dung lượng
1,67 MB
Nội dung
FINAL REPORT
Phase II:
Estimating HealthandEconomic Damages
Illness Costs
Illness CostsIllness Costs
Illness Costs
of
ofof
of
Air Pollution
Air PollutionAir Pollution
Air Pollution
Submitted to
Ontario Medical Association
By
DSS Management Consultants Inc.
July 26, 2000
DSS Management Consultants Inc.
Designers of Decision Support Systems
July 26, 2000
Dr. Ted Boadway
Executive Director, Health Policy Department
Ontario Medical Association
525 University Avenue
Suite 300
Toronto, ON M5G 2K7
Dear Dr. Boadway:
Re: PhaseII:EstimatingHealthandEconomic Damages
Illness CostsofAir Pollution
Our File No. 257a.20
Following is our final report for the above project.
This report contains complete technical documentation for ICAP and the derivation of all of the
data used in that model. As well, the results of applying ICAP to analyze the Ontario Anti-Smog
Action Plan are included.
Yours truly,
Edward Hanna
c.c. M. Perley
Project Team
1886 Bowler Drive, Pickering, ON L1V 3E4 Telephone: (905) 839-8814, Fax 839-0058
ii
Executive Summary
For several decades, the Ontario Medical Association has played a leadership role promoting
improvements in air quality to prevent illness and premature death. This report builds on these
initiatives and develops a quantitative foundation for estimating the healthandeconomic damages
caused by air pollution. Accompanying this report is a computer model (ICAP – Illness C
osts of
Air Pollution) which is based on the data presented in this report. ICAP provides forecasts of
health andeconomicdamages for expected or desired future air quality conditions in Ontario.
The main body of this report outlines the technical foundations for ICAP. Information
requirements and uncertainties are reviewed. The results of an analysis of the Ontario Anti-Smog
Action Plan are discussed. Eleven technical appendices deal in detail with various aspects of
ICAP and the forecasting ofhealthandeconomicdamages due to air pollution.
The impacts of two pollutants (i.e., ozone and particulate matter) on human health are analyzed.
Human health impacts are grouped into five broad categories, namely, premature mortality,
hospital admissions, emergency room visits, doctor’s office visits and minor illnesses. Each
broad illness category is further broken down into specific illness types for a total of 19 specific
cardio-respiratory illnesses. For each illness type, the illness rate is forecast by age group (i.e., 0-
17, 18-65, 65+).
Economic damages corresponding to these illnesses are forecast according to four discrete
components, namely value of loss of life (i.e., increased risk of premature death), value of quality
of life (i.e., increased pain and suffering from illness), health care costsand lost productivity (i.e.,
lost wages and time). Total economicdamages are calculated by summing these damage
components.
This information has been used to analyze the healthandeconomic benefits of Ontario’s Anti-
Smog Action Plan (ASAP). The benefits of the ASAP are compared to the expected damages if
current air quality conditions remained the same (i.e., the status quo). As well, the benefits of
advancing the date for the ASAP reduction targets from 2015 to 2010 are forecast. Health and
economic damages associated with background levels of ozone have been deducted from these
forecasts.
iii
In the year 2000, Ontario is forecast to suffer in the order of 1,900 premature deaths, 9,800
hospital admissions, 13,000 emergency room visits and 46 million illnesses as a result of air
pollution. (Forecasts of doctor’s office visits are not included due to the absence of supporting
epidemiological studies.) If air quality conditions remain constant for the next 20 years (i.e., to
the year 2020), these illnesses and deaths will increase substantially. This increase is due to an
expanding population as well as an aging population which is at higher risk to air pollution
impacts.
These health impacts involve about $10 billion in annual economic damages. Loss of life and
pain and suffering account for about $4.1 and $4.8 billion of this total. Annual health care costs
of air pollution are in the order of $600 million; lost productivity accounts for an additional $560
million in annual damages. These economicdamages are expected to increase substantially over
the next 20 years.
The ASAP will reduce healthandeconomicdamages by about 11% overall, compared to the
status quo. The residual damages (i.e., those damages expected even with full implementation of
the ASAP) in 2015 are substantial and in total are forecast to be in the order of $10.7 billion
annually.
Advancing the target date for the ASAP from 2015 to 2010 will reduce somewhat the expected
damages for the intervening years. Nonetheless, substantial residual damages are forecast. The
benefits of the ASAP are largely attributable to emissions reduction measures in the U.S., not to
initiatives in Ontario. If Ontario-only impacts of the ASAP are included, the avoided damages
amount to about 4% of the total.
The potential for over- or underestimates is discussed at appropriate locations throughout the
report. It is concluded that these estimates ofhealthandeconomicdamages are underestimates.
Recommendations are included in the report with respect to future initiatives to use and improve
ICAP for policy analysis.
iv
Acknowledgements
This report was prepared for
Dr. Ted Boadway
, Director of Environmental Health Policy at the
Ontario Medical Association. Dr. Boadway provided ongoing encouragement, support, direction
and input to the study from its inception to completion.
Michael Perley
, Director of the Ontario
Campaign for Action on Tobacco, and a consultant to the OMA, also provided ongoing and
helpful input over the entire course of the study.
Patricia Graham
, Assistant to Dr. Boadway,
played an invaluable role in facilitating and coordinating the flow of e-mails, reports, phone calls,
meetings, etc. relating to the project.
This project was funded by the Walter and Gordon Duncan Foundation.
Ms. Christine Lee
,
Executive Director of the Foundation maintained a keen and positive interest from start to finish.
The DSS project team involved a number of people with diverse backgrounds. Following is a list
of the individuals involved and their responsibilities.
Dr. David Bates –
Illness risk factors
Mrs. Soile Hämäläinen –
Administration, report production and graphics
Mr. Ed Hanna
– Project direction
Dr. Robin Hanvelt –
Health economics
Dr. Kapil Khatter
– Environmental health
Ms. Dianna Kopansky
– Researcher
Dr. David McKeown
– Environmental health
Mr. David Schneider
– Health data analyst
Mr. Steve Spencer
– Computer model design and programming
Dr. Peter Victor –
Economic valuation
The project draws on data from diverse sources. Many people and organizations assisted in
providing access to data. This list of sources is long but several sources deserve special mention.
Dean Stinson-O’Gorman
at Environment Canada is responsible for their Air Quality Valuation
Model. He made available documentation and data related to their model.
Dr. David Stieb
at
Health Canada provided helpful comments on some of the inputs included in ICAP.
Jack
Donnan
at the Ontario Ministry of the Energy was helpful in identifying critical relevant
information for Ontario.
Despite the many individuals and organizations who provided key inputs to this study, DSS
accepts responsibility for the contents of this report.
Notice:
A final draft of this report was circulated to the federal government for comment. Their
comments could not be provided before the deadline for issuing this final report. These
comments may be incorporated in later version of this report. Any revised versions will be posted
on the OMA web-site.
v
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ii
Acknowledgements iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables ix
List of Figures x
List of Acronyms xii
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 B
ACKGROUND
1
1.2 P
URPOSE AND
S
COPE
2
1.2.1 Project 2
1.2.2 ICAP 3
1.2.3 Technical Report 4
1.3 M
ETHODOLOGY
4
2. CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION 5
2.1 O
VERVIEW
5
2.2 R
ESOLUTION
7
2.2.1 Spatial Resolution 9
2.2.2 Temporal Resolution 9
2.3 E
XPOSED
P
OPULATION
10
2.4 A
IR
Q
UALITY
C
ONDITIONS
11
2.5 E
XPOSURE
/R
ESPONSE
F
UNCTIONS
11
2.6 E
CONOMIC
V
ALUATION
12
2.6.1 Health Care Resource Utilization 13
2.6.2 Lost Productivity 14
2.6.3 Quality of Life 15
2.6.4 Risk of Death 15
2.7 T
REATMENT OF
U
NCERTAINTY
16
3. INFORMATION BASE 18
3.1 P
OPULATION
18
3.1.1 Ontario 1996 Population 18
3.1.2 Population Forecasts 18
3.2 A
IR
Q
UALITY
19
3.2.1 Baseline Data 19
3.2.2 Air Quality Forecasts 19
3.3 I
LLNESS
R
ISKS
19
3.4 H
EALTH
C
ARE
R
ESOURCE
U
TILIZATION
20
3.4.1 Hospital Admission Costs 20
3.4.2 Emergency Room Visit Costs 20
3.4.3 Doctor’s Office Visit Costs 21
3.4.4 Medication Costs 21
3.5 L
OST
P
RODUCTIVITY
21
3.6 Q
UALITY OF
L
IFE
21
3.7 P
REMATURE
D
EATH
22
3.8 S
UMMARY
22
4. UNCERTAINTIES AND GAPS 24
4.1 S
OURCES OF
U
NCERTAINTY
24
4.2 S
CIENTIFIC
I
GNORANCE
25
4.3 S
TOCHASTICITY
25
4.4 I
MPRECISION
26
4.5 M
ETHODOLOGICAL
W
EAKNESSES
27
5. HEALTH DAMAGE FORECASTS FOR ONTARIO 28
5.1 S
CENARIO
1 - N
ATURAL
B
ACKGROUND
C
ONCENTRATIONS
28
5.1.1 Rationale 28
5.1.2 Health Effects 29
vi
5.1.3 EconomicDamages 30
5.2 S
CENARIO
2 – M
AINTENANCE OF
C
URRENT
L
EVELS OF
P
OLLUTION
31
5.2.1 Rationale 31
5.2.2 Health Effects 32
5.2.3 EconomicDamages 38
5.3 S
CENARIO
3 – I
MPLEMENTATION OF
A
NTI
-S
MOG
A
CTION
P
LAN IN
2015 39
5.3.1 Rationale 39
5.3.2 Health Effects 39
5.3.3 EconomicDamages 41
5.4 R
EGIONAL
D
ISTRIBUTION OF
D
AMAGES
42
5.5 N
EW
2010 T
ARGET FOR
ASAP 43
5.5.1 HealthDamages 43
5.5.2 EconomicDamages 43
5.6 U.S. C
ONTRIBUTION
44
5.7 C
OMPARISON OF
R
ESULTS
45
5.7.1 Premature Mortality 45
5.7.2 Hospital Admissions 45
5.7.3 Interpretation 46
5.8 S
UMMARY
46
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 47
6.1 A
IR
Q
UALITY
47
6.1.1 Need for Improved Air Quality Monitoring Data 47
6.1.2 Impacts ofAir Quality Initiatives on Ambient Concentrations of Key Pollutants 47
6.1.3 Net Air Quality Effects of Multiple Government Policies 48
6.2 H
EALTH
E
FFECTS
48
6.2.1 Supporting Clinical Studies 48
6.2.2 Multi-Pollutant Exposure/Response Functions 49
6.2.3 Less Acute Air Pollution Induced Illnesses 49
6.2.4 Illness Prevalence 50
6.3 E
CONOMIC
D
AMAGES
50
6.3.1 Improved Estimates of Pain and Suffering Damages 50
6.3.2 Improved Estimates of Medication Costs 51
6.3.3 Doctor’s Office Costs 51
6.4 ICAP 51
6.4.1 Improved Public Awareness 52
6.4.2 Local Analysis ofAir Quality Impacts 52
6.4.3 Need for Regular Updating 52
6.5 E
NVIRONMENTAL AND
H
EALTH
C
ARE
P
OLICY
52
6.5.1 Significant Residual Damages 53
6.5.2 Cost of Delay 53
6.5.3 Absence of Comprehensive Economic Evaluations 53
Bibliography 54
Appendix A ICAP Model Description
Appendix B Population Forecasting
Appendix C Air Quality
Appendix D Estimation of Morbidity and Mortality Frequencies
Appendix E In-patient and Emergency Room Treatment Costs
Appendix F Doctor’s Office Treatment Costs
Appendix G Medication Costs
Appendix H Economic Losses Due to Premature Mortality
vii
Appendix I Quality of Life Damages
Appendix J Lost Productivity Damages
Appendix K ICAP Results
viii
List of Tables
Table 5.1 Comparative Human HealthDamages With Changes in Air Quality p. 30
Table 5.2 Comparative EconomicDamages With Changes in Air Quality p. 31
Table B.1a Breakdown of 1996 Ontario Population By Census Division – Males p. B-3
Table B.1b Breakdown of 1996 Ontario Population By Census Division – Females p. B-4
Table B.2a Breakdown of 1996 Ontario Population By Census Metropolitan Area –
Males p. B-5
Table B.2b Breakdown of 1996 Ontario Population By Census Metropolitan Area –
Females p. B-6
Table B.3a Annual Population Growth Rates for Ontario Male Population –
Low Growth p. B-7
Table B.3b Annual Population Growth Rates for Ontario Female Population –
Low Growth p. B-8
Table B.4a Annual Population Growth Rates for Ontario Male Population –
Central Growth p. B-9
Table B.4b Annual Population Growth Rates for Ontario Female Population –
Central Growth p. B-10
Table B.5a Annual Population Growth Rates for Ontario Male Population –
High Growth p. B-11
Table B.5b Annual Population Growth Rates for Ontario Female Population –
High Growth p. B-12
Table C.1 1996 Baseline Air Quality Data by Census Division p. C-10
Table C.2 1996 Baseline Air Quality Data by Census Metropolitan Area p. C-11
Table C.3 PM
10
Reductions with Anti-Smog Action Plan and U.S. Clear Air
Act SO
2
Emission Reductions p. C-6
Table D.1 Weighted Average Percentage Increase in Hospital Admissions
With 10 ppb Change in Pollutant Concentration p. D-13
Table D.2 Age-specific Illness Frequencies for Respiratory and Cardiac
Hospital Admissions p. D-13
Table D.3 Illness Risks for Emergency Room Visits With a 10 µg/m
3
Change
In Pollutant Concentration p. D-18
Table D.4 Illness Risks for Minor Illness Symptoms With a 10 µg/m
3
Change
In Pollutant Concentration p. D-21
Table D.5 Exposure/Response Functions for Ozone p. D-27
Table D.6 Exposure/Response Functions for PM
10
p. D-28
Table E.1 Operating Cost Information for Ontario Hospitals p. E-9
Table E.2 Average Hospital and Emergency Room Costs by Census Division p. E-11
Table E.3 Average Hospital and Emergency Room Costs by Census Metropolitan
ix
Area p. E-12
Table E.4 Correspondence Among ICD-9 Codes and Major Case Mix Groups p. E-13
Table E.5 Resource Intensity Weights for Each Eligible Case Mix Group p. E-16
Table E.6 Correspondence Among ICD-9 Codes and Major Illness Categories p. E-21
Table E.7 ICD-9 Case Frequencies for Ontario in 1998 p. E-23
Table E.8 Weighted RIWs by Illness Category for Ontario p. E-26
Table E.9 Average Costs for a Hospital Admission by Illness Category and Age
Group for Ontario Census Divisions p. E-27
Table E.10 Average Costs for a Hospital Admission by Illness Category and Age
Group for Ontario Census Metropolitan Areas p. E-28
Table F.1 Average Costs for Doctor’s Office Visit by ICD-9 Diagnostic Category p. F-6
Table F.2 Average Costs Per Doctor’s Office Visit by Illness Category p. F-7
Table G.1 Calculations Used To Derive Medication Cost Coefficients p. G-5
Table G.2 Medication Costs on a Per Incidence Basis by Illness Category p. G-6
Table H.1 Estimates of the Economic Value of Premature Mortality p. H-8
Table H.2 Average Annual Health Care Consumption by Gender and Age Group p. H-9
Table H.3 Net Present Value ofHealth Care Savings from Premature Mortality p. H-10
Table H.4 Economic Coefficients – Value of a Statistical Life p. H-11
Table I.1 Economic Coefficients and Probabilities for Quality of Life Losses p. I-6
Table J.1 Lost Days by Illness Category and Age Group p. J-6
Table J.2 Value of Lost Working Day by Census Division p. J-9
Table J.3 Value of a Lost Working Day by Census Metropolitan Area p. J-11
Table K.1 Forecasts of Illnesses Attributable To Natural Background Levels of
Ozone and Particulate Matter p. K-4
Table K.2 Forecasts ofEconomicDamages Attributable To Natural Background
Levels of Ozone and Particulate Matter p. K-6
Table K.3 Forecasts of Total Illnesses with the Maintenance of Current Levels of
Anthropogenic Ozone and Particulate Matter p. K-8
Table K.4 Forecasts of Total EconomicDamages with Maintenance of Current
Levels of Ozone and Particulate Matter p. K-9
Table K.5 Forecast of Avoided and Residual Illnesses Attributable to Air Pollution
in 2015 With a Fully Effective Ontario Anti-Smog Action Plan p. K-10
Table K.6 Forecast of Avoided and Residual EconomicDamages Attributable to Air
Pollution in 2015 With Fully Effective Ontario Anti-Smog Action Plan p. K-11
[...]... range of physical andeconomicdamages in addition to those relating to human health These impacts include damages to materials and structures, agriculture, forestry and natural ecosystems This study does not address these impacts and related economicdamages Any damages to these other components of the environment are additive to the healthdamages estimated in this report 6 Figure 1 – Overview of Epidemiological... at hand is critical A primary purpose of this study is to bring together this complexity and to provide an efficient means for people of all sorts to gain improved understanding ofair quality and related government policies in terms of the future healthand well-being of Ontarians This study has focused on cardio-respiratory illnesses caused by the principal components of smog, namely ozone and air- borne... develop appropriate estimates of the economicdamages relating to air pollution-induced illnesses (42) A methodology was designed for developing an integrated analytical system which would bring together the best knowledge and data on air quality, human healthand economics and which would produce forecasts of expected damages (and avoided damages) relating to changes in air quality In 1999, the OMA... andeconomicdamages attributable to air pollution This report also provides a more indepth understanding of the technical underpinnings of ICAP Estimates ofhealthdamages are included in this report No analysis is included as to what air quality policy actions are, or are not, warranted given the magnitude ofdamages being, and expected to be, incurred This step is vital but is outside the scope of. .. perspective, damages from premature mortality and pain and suffering can be, and should be, added to estimates of out -of- pocket economic losses in deciding on the best environmental policy Damage estimates in this report are presented for individual economic components as well as for the combined total Doing so allows separation of these different types ofdamages When comparing damages to the costsof pollutant... description as to how the economic value of reducing the risk of death has been estimated and used in this analysis 2.7 Treatment of Uncertainty Uncertainty about the future is a fact of life From a public policy perspective, one needs to decide how best to reduce and manage uncertainty Estimatinghealth effects andeconomicdamages attributable to air pollution involves a considerable level of uncertainty This... ICAP users 3.4 Health Care Resource Utilization Following is a brief description of the health care data which have been used to develop estimates of the health care costs of air pollution 3.4.1 Hospital Admission Costs An extensive hospital cost database and cost estimating procedure have been developed by the Canadian Institute of Hospital Information (CIHI) to apportion the costsof hospital treatment... population and environmental factors Key information requirements are: i) current and future air quality conditions, ii) current and future size, distribution and composition of the exposed population, iii) E/RFs for key air pollutants, and iv) economic coefficients for air pollution-induced illnesses This report describes the information which has been compiled for Ontario for estimating physical and economic. .. common in the air pollution /health effects epidemiological literature and is appropriate for public healthand environmental policy analysis 2.3 Exposed Population Estimatinghealth effects attributable to air pollution requires identifying the number of individuals exposed to air pollution in different parts of the province Some segments of the population are more susceptible to certain air pollution... hand, economies continue to grow The result often may be that increases in total air emissions outstrip initiatives to control individual emissions Evaluating the potential benefits ofair quality policies requires knowledge of current air quality conditions and also estimates of how air quality is likely to change in the future given alternative courses of action and outcomes Forecasting future air . REPORT
Phase II:
Estimating Health and Economic Damages
Illness Costs
Illness CostsIllness Costs
Illness Costs
of
ofof
of
Air Pollution
Air PollutionAir Pollution
Air. various aspects of
ICAP and the forecasting of health and economic damages due to air pollution.
The impacts of two pollutants (i.e., ozone and particulate