The palgrave international handbook of a 176

1 6 0
The palgrave international handbook of a 176

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Thông tin tài liệu

168 E Cudworth subjected to, such as the inability to express species-life behaviours, which can be understood as forms of violence (Cudworth 2015) All animal lives in contemporary agricultural systems are drastically foreshortened and overwhelmingly, these short lives are barren and stressful While there is much cruelty, this is not ‘extreme’ practice, rather it is inbuilt into the everyday operations of reproducing and growing animals for food Explanations A number of explanations are advanced to explain the exploitation and abuse of animals in the processes of farming: first, the commoditisation of animals in capitalism and the demands of profit, second and relatedly, the development of industrial modes of production, third, the oppression originating in the early processes of domestication and finally, I will offer my own account which notes all of these processes but also emphasises the historical context of colonial relations and gendered power Some approaches emphasise the commoditisation of animals in agricultural production David Nibert (2002, p 7) explicitly uses the concept of oppression in relation to the historical development of human relations with non-human animals He argues that social institutions such as those of animal agriculture are foundational for the oppression of animals Nibert isolates three elements in his model of non-human animal oppression First, we have economic exploitation where animals are exploited for human interests; second, power inequalities coded in law leave animals open to exploitation; and third, this is legitimated by an ideology—‘speciesism’— which naturalises the oppression of animals in its many forms Contemporary cultural processes and institutional arenas though which animals are exploited and oppressed—such as faming and food production are explained in terms of profit creation, corporate interest and the generation and sustaining of false commodity needs Bob Torres (2007) applies Nibert’s model to the case of industrialised capital-intensive agriculture in the global north Animals are largely understood by Torres as labourers, who labour by eating and breeding in producing commodities such as milk and eggs in dull, barren and stressful conditions Animals are also property which enables their transformation into embodied commodities such as meat and leather (2007, pp 36–58) Torres allows that the oppression of animals can exist before and beyond capitalism (2007, p 156), but capitalism has ‘deepened, extended and worsened our domination over animals and the natural world’ (2007, p 3) While

Ngày đăng: 24/10/2022, 11:02

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan