An Analysis of National Educational Assessment Policy in the Peop

Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU ETD Archive 2007 An Analysis of National Educational Assessment Policy in the People's Republic of China and the United States Guofang Yuan Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive Part of the Education Commons How does access to this work benefit you? Let us know! Recommended Citation Yuan, Guofang, "An Analysis of National Educational Assessment Policy in the People's Republic of China and the United States" (2007) ETD Archive 317 https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive/317 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by EngagedScholarship@CSU It has been accepted for inclusion in ETD Archive by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU For more information, please contact library.es@csuohio.edu AN ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT POLICY IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES GUOFANG YUAN Bachelor of Arts in English Language and Literature Shanghai Teachers’ University July, 1991 Master of Arts in Chinese Language and Literature Yunnan Nationalities University July, 1994 Master of Arts in English Language and Literature Beijing Normal University July, 1998 Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN URBAN EDUCATION at the CLEVELAND STATE UNVERSITY August, 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This researcher would like to acknowledge the following important people that have helped to make this dissertation possible: To all those who graciously helped me through the completion of this research and my doctoral program course of study, including my encouraging professors, my dedicated committee members, my generous cohort peers, and my supportive family, and to all students, parents, teachers, and educational professionals who have worked hard, and continue to work hard to improve the educational system in both China and the United States AN ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT POLICY IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES GUOFANG YUAN ABSTRACT Ongoing changes in educational assessment policies within China and the United States have created numerous challenges in interpreting and comparing these policies because of the two very distinct contexts On the one hand, educational assessment policies seem to be diverging, with the United States moving towards more standardized testing and China moving away from it On the other hand, the policies and the reforms seem to converge, with both nations utilizing standardized testing as an important vehicle for educational improvement In China, the college/university entrance examination was reinstated in 1977 after it was discontinued by the Great Proletariat Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) Under unique political and economic circumstances, a series of testing policy reforms and measures were initiated and implemented in the 1980s, in order to correct the tendency to pursue the one-sided promotion ratio to a higher level of schooling and to counter the negative consequences of test-oriented education Since the 1990s, as Chinese education reform deepened, educational assessment reform was implemented along with other reforms with regard to curricula, teaching materials, and instructional pedagogy The goal was to achieve a quality education with an improved standard in national education, so that education could best serve China’s economic development and improve its competitiveness in globalization iv Since 1983, American education reform, with an aggressive involvement of both the federal and state governments, focused on creating and implementing more competitive educational standard for students, teachers, and school administration in a global context From Ronald Reagan to George W Bush, U.S presidents, for both political and economic purposes, attempted to push American education toward a more competitive and international standard of better quality Through a brief description of the national educational assessment policy documents in China and the United States, and an analysis of these policies and critiques, this dissertation will attempt to uncover the economic and political forces that have driven the national educational assessment reform in the two societies, as seen from both national and global perspectives v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS Overview Goals of Analysis 12 Process and Problem Statement 13 Limitations of the Research -19 Definition of Key Terms -21 CHAPTER II POLICY DOCUMENT REVIEW AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY -30 Overview -30 Documentation of Chinese Educational Reform Policies -31 A Testing Tradition in China -31 Documented Reform of Testing Policy -34 Documentation for Quality Education 35 Policies Aligned with Economic Development 36 Educational Reform Policy Documents – Specific Issues Addressed -38 Chinese Policy Reform – Proposals Revisited -48 Documentation of American Educational Reform Policies -53 Standard-based Reform -53 A Nation at Risk -55 Standards of Performance 56 Goals 2000: Educate America Act 58 vi The No Child Left Behind Act -60 Documented Controversy over Change in the U.S -62 Research Questions -67 Methodological Context, Theory, and Support -68 Globalization as a Context for Understanding -68 Discourse Theory – Understanding Language -70 Research Methods 73 Primary and Secondary Document Review 74 Critical Examination of Documents 75 Analyzing Primary Documents: Similarities and Differences -76 Analyzing Secondary Documents: Validating Government Documents 77 Method Choice -78 Cultural Comparative Study -78 Document Analysis -79 CHAPTER III CHINESE EDUCATION POLICY REFORM: FROM TESTORIENTED EDUCATION TO QUALITY EDUCATION -81 Educational and Testing in the Old China Before 1949 81 Red China and the Four Modernizations (1950s - 1960s) -84 Educational Reform and Policy Implementation in the New China (1949-1966) -88 vii Educational Utilitarianism (the 1970s) -93 Educational Reform in the 1980s 109 Reform in the 1990s: Test-Oriented or Quality-Oriented Education? 130 Documentation for Change 142 Concluding Reform in the 1990s -144 Quality Education Reform in 1999 -145 Reform Trends in the New Millennium – 2000 and Beyond -150 Conclusion – Decades of Reform 152 Summary of China’s Education Reform 155 2007 - Political, Social, and Cultural Challenges to Reform Efforts 158 CHAPTER IV EDUCATION REFORM IN THE POSTWAR U.S SINCE 1980S: FROM EQUITY TO EXCELLENCE 160 Overview 160 The 1950s - 1970s: An Education for All -161 Educational Quality and Equity 162 Educational Quality in the 1980s and 1990s 164 State Standards in 2000 and Beyond -166 Implications of Standards-based Reform 167 Conclusion of American Reform Efforts 221 CHAPTER V A DISCURSIVE ANALYSIS OF REFORM IN CHINA AND THE U.S.: CONVERGENT AND DIVERGENT EFFORTS -229 Social Context as an Impetus for Change 229 viii Same Goals, Different Approaches -231 Culturally Different Interpretations Within Each Nation -251 Centralized vs Decentralized Policy-making -255 Centralized vs Decentralized Policy Implementation -259 Conclusion of Reform Efforts -264 REFERENCES -268 ix CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS Overview China and the U.S - Two Systems of Education As part of a system that rewarded effort and achievement for any citizen to become one of the ruling elite, sophisticated written civil service examinations have been in existence in China as early as 2200 B.C (Ebel, 1972; Solomon 1985; Suen & Vu, 2006) After the Civil Service Examination was officially instated in the sixth century, for most people social mobility was achieved through accessible educational opportunity and the ability to succeed in a number of competitive state examinations German sociologist Max Weber, who conducted a thorough study on China, made an incisive observation on the social significance of a successful education to the Chinese people: “For twelve centuries, social rank in China has been determined more by qualification for office than by wealth This qualification, in turn, has been determined by education, and especially by examinations” (Gerth & Mills, 1946, p 416) In contrast to China, the U.S written examinations have a comparatively short history Although examinations had always existed in secondary schools and colleges, attempts were not made to systematize competitive exams until the mid-nineteenth century Horace Mann, the Secretary of the Massachusetts State Board of Education in the education in China NASSP Bulletin Ma, J (1993) Strengthen the scientific research on examinations, revive the enterprise of examinations in China Chinese Education & Society, 26, 30-42 Madus, G F (1994) A technological and historical consideration of equity issues associated with proposals to change the nation’s testing policy Harvard Educational Review, 64, 76-95 Man, Q (1997) Educational despair and quality education reform Chinese Education & Society, 30, 21-25 Marginson, S., & Mollis, M (2001) “The door opens and the tiger leaps”: Theories and reflexivities of comparative education for a global millennium Comparative Education Review, 45(4) Marzano, R J., & Kendall, J S (1997) National and state standards: The problems and the promise NASSP Bulletin, 81, 26-41 Marzano, R J., & Kendall, J S (1998) Implementing standards-based education Washington D.C.: National Education Association of the United States McGuinn, P J (2006) No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965-2005 Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas McNeil L M (2000) Contradictions of School reform: Educational costs of standardized testing New York, NY: Routledge Mehrens, W A (1989) Using test scores for decision making In B R Gifford (Ed.), Test policy and test performance: Education, language, and culture Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers Mehrens, W A., & Lehmann, I J (1987) Standardized tests in education (4th ed.) 283 New York: Longman Inc Merrow, J (2001) Choosing excellence: “Good enough” schools are not good enough Lanham, MA: The Scarecrow Press, INC The Ministry of Education (1983) Ten Regulations on fully carrying out the mission of national education, and correct the tendency of blindly seeking promotion rate in general middle schools Beijing, China The Ministry of Education (1984) Proposals on teaching plan in six-year elementary schools Beijing, China The Ministry of Education (1999) Proposals on deepening the reform of the college entrance examination and admission system Beijing, China The Ministry of Education (1999) Circular of Directives on Reforming Graduation Examination, and Entrance Examination in Secondary Middle Schools Beijing, China The Ministry of Education (2000) A Circular on Taking Prompt Measures to Lighten Students’ School Burden Beijing, China The Ministry of Education (2001) Circular of Guiding Principles on Curricula Reform in Basic Education Beijing, China The Ministry of Education (2002) Circular of Directives on Reforming Basic Education and Educational Assessment Beijing, China The Ministry of Education (2006) Report of Education Statistics in 2005 Beijing, China Mitchell, R (1992) Testing for learning: How new approaches to evaluation can improve American schools New York City: The Free Press 284 Mo, Z (2002) A brief history of Chinese education Anhui, China: Anhui Education Press National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform Washington, DC: NCEE National Council on Education Standards and Testing (1992) Raising standards for American education Washington, DC: NCEST Niu, D (1992) Policy education and inequalities: In communist China since 1949 Lanham: University Press of America Ngok, K., & Kwong, J (2003) Globalization and educational restructuring in China In K Mok and A Welch (Eds.), Globalization and educational restructuring in theAsia Pacific Region N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan Noah, H J., & Eckstein, M A (1962) Toward a science of comparative education Toronto: The Macmillan Company O’Day, J A (1995) Systemic reform and goals 2000 In J F Jennings (Ed.), National issues in education goals 2000 and school-to-work Phi Delta Kappa International, IN: Bloomington O’ Day, J A., & Simth, M S (1993) Systemic school reform and educational opportunity In S H Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system Jossey-Bass, CA: San Francisco Ogawa, R T., Sandholtz, J H., Martinez-Flores, M., & Scribner, S P (2003) The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district’s standards-based curriculum American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 147-176 Ohanian, S (1999) One size fits few: The folly of educational standards Portsmouth, 285 NH: Reed Elsevier, INC Orfield, G., & Wald J (2000) The high stakes testing mania hurts poor and minority students the most The Nation, June The Party Literature Research Centre of the Chinese Communist Party (1993) The Selected Works of Zhou Enlai on Economy Beijing, China: Party Literature Press Centre of the CCP (Zhongyang wenxian chubanshe, 中央文献出版社) The Party Literature Research Centre of the Chinese Communist Party (2006) The Selected Works of Jiang Zemin Beijing, China: People’s Press (人民出版社) Pepper, S (1980) Chinese education after Mao: Two steps forward, two steps back, and begin again China Quarterly, 81, 1-65 Pepper, S (1984) China’s universities Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies The University of Michigan Phelps, R P (1999) Why testing experts hate testing Washington, DC: Thomas B Fordham Foundation Pompham, W J (2004) America’s “failing” schools: How parents and teachers can cope with No Child Left Behind New York, NY: Routledge Falmer Porter, A C (1995) The uses and misuses of opportunity-to-learn standards In D Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessment? Washington DC: Brookings Institution Powell, A G., Farrar, E., & D K Cohen (1985) The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company 286 Qian, J., & Huang, K (1987) On contemporary reform of secondary education in the eighties Canadian and International Education, 45(2), 86-102 Quality, development, and education (1997) Chinese Education & Society, 30, 12-15 Ravitch, D (1993) Critical issues in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement In J Jennings (Ed.), National issues in education: The past is prologue Phi Delta Kappa International, IN: Bloomington Ravitch, D (Ed.) (1995) Introduction In D Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we really need national standards and assessments? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Ravitch, D (1995) National standards in American education: A citizen’s guide Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Ravitch, D (1996) The case of national standards and assessment The Clearing House, 69, 134-136 Ravitch, D (2000) Left back: A century of failed school reform New York: Simon and Schuster Reimers, F (Ed) (2000) Unequal schools, Unequal chances: The challenges to equal opportunity in the Americas Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Resnick L B., & Nolan, K J (1995) Standards for education In D Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessment? Washington DC: Brookings Institution Resnick L B., & Resnick D P (1982) Standards, curriculum, and performance: A 287 historical and comparative perspective Revised Washington, DC: Department of Education Riley, R W (1993) Clinton sends congress Goals 2000: Educate America Act Cited by Jennings (1998) in Why national standards and tests? Politics and the quest for better schools (p 52) SAGE publications, CA: Thousand Oaks Riley, R W (1995) The Goals 2000: Educate America Act Providing a world-class education for every child In J F Jennings (Ed.), National issues in education goals 2000 and school-to-work (p 3-26) Phi Delta Kappa International, IN: Bloomington Robinsohn, S B (1992) Introduction, relevant data in comparative education In H Robinsohn (Ed.), Comparative education: A basic approach Jerusalem, Israel: The Magnes Press Romer, R (1995) Explaining standards to the public In D Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessment? Washington DC: Brookings Institution Rosen, S (1984) New directions in secondary education In R Hayhoe (Ed.), Contemporary Chinese education (pp 65-92) London: Croom Helm Rosen, S (1997) Education and economic reform In C Hudson (Ed.), The China handbook Chicago and London: Fitzroy Dearborn publishers Rowan B (1996) Standards as incentives for instructional reform In S H Fuhrman & J A O’ Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp.195-225) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Safer, D (1986) The stress of secondary school for vulnerable students Journal of 288 Youth and Adolescence, 1(5), 405-407 Sandholtz, J H., Ogawa, R T., & Scribner, S P (2004) Standards gaps: unintended consequences of local standards-based reform Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1177-1202 Seeberg, V (2000) The rhetoric and reality of mass education in Mao’s China Lewiston, N.Y.: E Mellen Press Shanker, A (1995) The case for high stakes and real consequences In D Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessment? Washington DC: Brookings Institution Sheldon, S M (2000) Why the battle over history standards In S Stotsky (Ed.), What’s at stake in the K-12 standards wars: A premier for educational policy makers New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc Shepard, L A (1983) Standards for placement and certification In S B Anderson and J S Helmick (Eds.), On educational testing San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass Inc Shepard, L., & Smith, M L (1986) Synthesis of research on school readiness and kindergarten retention Educational Leadership, 44(3), 86 Shepard, L., & Smith, M L (1988) Flunking kindergarten: Escalating curriculum leaves many behind American Educator, 12(2), 34-38 Shirk, S L (1979) Educational reform and political backlash: Recent changes in Chinese educational policy Comparative Educational Review, 23(2), 183-217 Sirotnik, K A., & Kimball, K (1999) Standards for standards-based accountability 289 system Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 209-214 Sizer, T R (1995) Will national standards and assessments make a difference? In D Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessment? Washington DC: Brookings Institution Smith, F., et al (1986) High school admission and the improvement of schooling New York: New York City Board of Education Smith, M S (1995) Education reform in America’s public schools: The Clinton agenda In D Ravitch (Ed.), Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessment? Washington DC: Brookings Institution Smith, M S., & O’Day, J (1990) Systemic school reform In S Fuhrman & B Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the politics of education association London: Taylor and Francis Solomon, R J (1985) Admission to higher education in the United States: The role of the educational test services Presented at the seminar on admission system in higher education in Beijing, Beijing, China Stake, R E (2000) Case studies In N K Denzin & Y Z Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications The State Council (1994) Proposals on Carrying out the Guiding Principles of Chinese Education Reform and Development Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1986) Circular on Reforming the Entrance Examination to Secondary Middle School Where Secondary Middle School Education Has Been Popularized Beijing, China 290 The State Education Commission (1988) Regulations on Lightening Elementary School Students’ Burden in Study Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1988) Suggestions on Re-orientating Middle Schools’ Teaching and Learning, Correcting the Tendency of Blindly Seeking for Promotion Ratio, and Reinforcing Education Supervision Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1989) Proposals on Reforming College Entrance Examination and Admission Policies Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1989) Circular of two suggestions on Experimentally Carrying Out Graduation Examination System in General High Schools Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1990) Another Circular of Carrying out the Regulations on Lightening Elementary Schools Students’ Over-Burden in Learning Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1990) Circular on Proposals of Adjusting Teaching Plan in General High School Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1990) Proposals on Carrying out a Graduation Examination System in General High Schools Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1992) Regulations on Administering the Unified College Admission Examination Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1993) Guiding Principles of Chinese Education Reform and Development Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1993) Directives on Lightening Students’ Stud 291 Burden in Compulsory Education period, and Promoting the Quality of Education Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1993) Proposals on Steadily Carrying out the Graduation Examination System in General High Schools Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1993) Proposals on Fully Carrying out the National Educational Mission, and Lightening Students’ Overburden in Learning in both Elementary and Middle Schools Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1995) Circular on Further Promoting and Perfection the Reform of Admission Policies for Secondary Middle School Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1995) Circular of Proposals on Fully Promoting the Quality of General High School Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1997) Proposals on Actively Carrying out Quality Education in Elementary and Middle Schools Beijing, China The State Education Commission (1998) Proposals on Carrying out Quality Education, Adjusting Curricula, and Reinforcing Teaching Administration in Elementary and Middle Schools Beijing, China Stecher, B M., Barron, S., Kaganoff, T., & Goodwin, J (1998) The effects of standards-based assessment on classroom practices: Results of the 1996-97 RAND Survey of Kentucky Teachers of Mathematics and Writing (CSE Technical Report 482) Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Stewart, D M (1995) Holding onto norms in a sea of criteria In D Ravitch (Ed.), 292 Debating the future of American education: Do we need national standards and assessment? Washington DC: Brookings Institution Stromquist, N P (2002) Preface Comparative Education Review, 46 (1) Stromquist, N P (2002) Education in a globalized world: the connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Suen, H K., & Yu, L (2006) Chronic consequences of high stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese Civil Service Exam Comparative Education Review, 50 (1) Sutton, J T., & Krueger, A (1997) Do we need NEW national standards in mathematics and science? NASSP Bulletin, 81, 48-55 Swanson, A D., & Zhang, Z (1987) Education reform in China Phi Delta Kappan 5, 255-70 Teng, Siu-Yu (1966) A history of Chinese examination system Taipei, Taiwan: Taiwan Student Press (Taiwan xuesheng shuju, 台湾学生书局) Thompson, S (2001) The authentic standards movement and its evil twin Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 358-365 Ting, S (1997) Once you have chosen the right path, hold on and not let go: an exploration of the broad promotion of quality education in Miluo Municipality in Hunan Province Chinese Education & Society, 30, 70-86 Tucker, M S., & Codding, J B (1998) Standards for our schools: how to set them, measure them, and reach them San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Tucker, M S., & Codding, J B (2001) Setting high standards for everyone In The 293 Jossey-Bass reader on school reform (pp 470-482) San Francisco: Jossey Bass Tyack, D (1974) The one best system Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Tyrack, D., & Cuban, L (1995) Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press U.S Congress, House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education, Committee on Education and Labor (1965) Aid to Elementary and Secondary Schools, 89th Cong., 1st sess., Washingtong, DC: Government Printing Office U.S Congress, House of Representatives (1993) Goals 2000: Educate America Act, Report to Accompany H.R 1804 Washington, DC: Government Printing Office U.S Congress, House of Representatives (2001) No Child Left Behind Act Washington, DC: Government Printing Office U.S Congress, Senate, Subcommittee on Appropriations, Committee on Appropriations (1995) Goals 2000 104th Cong., 1st session Washington, DC: Government Printing Office U.S Department of Education (1993) How Goals 2000: Education America Act will work Cited by Jennings (1998) in Why national standards and tests? Politics and the quest for better schools (p.52) SAGE publications, CA: Thousand Oaks U.S Department of Education (1991) America 2000: An Education Strategy Washington, DC: Government Printing Office 294 U.S Department of Education (1997) Guidance on Standards, Assessments, and Accountability Washington, DC: Government Printing Office Vinovskis, M A (1996) An analysis of the concept and uses of systemic educational reform American Educational Research Journal, 33(1) Wang, C (1997) To strengthen quality education, we must start with optimizing the curricular structure Chinese Education & Society, 30, 43-46 Wen, B (1993) Analysis of the decline in the scores of the college-university entrance examination in Beijing Municipality Chinese Education & Society, 26, 47-59 Winfield, U F., & Woodland, M D (1992) Where are equity and diversity in America 2000? Education Week, January 29 Wu, H (1986) A warning for rural education Peasants’ Daily, November, 15, Wu, W., & Luo, D (1995) Combat in “Black July” Chinese Education & Society, 28, 9-38 Yang, D G (Ed.) (1995) Deng Xiaoping’s education thoughts and modern Chinese education Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press Yang, D G (2004) China’s joining the WTO and educational reform and development Chinese Education and Society, 36, 12-21 Yang, D P (2003) A slow sunrise: challenges confronting China’s modern education in the 20th century (艰难的日出:中国现代教育的二十世纪) Shanghai, China: Wenhui Press Yang, X (1993) The general upper middle school graduation examination Chinese Education & Society, 26, 15-27 295 Yang, X (1993a) A major reform in the examination system Chinese Education & Society, 26, 77-96 Yang, X (1993b) On reforming the college and university entrance examinations Chinese Education & Society, 26, 6-30 Yang, X (1993c) Proposals regarding the college-university examination taking Place after the upper middle school general gradation examination Chinese Education & Society, 26, 27-37 Yang, Y (1997) An exploration of several theoretical problems concerning quality education Chinese Education & Society, 30, 8-12 Yang, Z (1997) Examinations, coping with examinations, and the relationship between examination-oriented education and quality education Chinese Education & Society, 30, 15-18 Yi, J., & Li, Y (2004) Reflections on Mao Zedong’s “Lightening students’ school burden” Education and Research, 25, 3-8 Yuan, Z (1999) On Chinese educational policy transformation: Case studies on equality and efficiency of key-point middle schools in China Guangzhou: Guangdong Educational Press Zhang, B., & Zhang, Z (1997) Pursuit of promotion rates in Chinese schools: A theoretical perspective Journal of Yunnan Normal University 2, 1-7 Zhang, B (1997) Reforming educational assessment and encouraging all-round development Chinese Education & Society, 30, 55-58 Zhang, B Q (2000) On a few major relationships in today’s educational work Chinese Education & Society, 33, 7-38 296 Zhang, J (1986) We need to increase the social effectiveness of rural middle schools Educational Research, 22, 17-23 Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y L (Eds.) (1984) Chinese educational yearbook 1949-1981 Beijing, Chinese Great Encyclopedia Press Zhen, L (1993) A exploration of the nature and roles of several large-scale examinations in our country today Chinese Education & Society, 26, 57-77 Zhen, L (1993a) The fundamental theory and practice for the uniform general admissions examination for colleges and universities in China Chinese Education & Society, 26, 42-57 Zhou, Z (1988) Urban education should also try to meet the general needs of our society People’s Education, 12, 13-14 Zhu, K (1997) Tentative ideas regarding the ninth five-year plan for China’s education and its long term targets for the year 2010 Chinese Education & Society, 30, 7-29 297 .. .AN ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT POLICY IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES GUOFANG YUAN Bachelor of Arts in English Language and Literature Shanghai... hard, and continue to work hard to improve the educational system in both China and the United States AN ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT POLICY IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND THE. .. reform, the open-door policy, and China’s increasing integration into the world economy Since China’s opening and reform policies were initiated at the end of the 1970s, China changed politically and