ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT-FRAMEWORK-DVRP-+-Additional-Finance-16March2016-(+Pest-Mgmt))

Introduction and Project Description

The World Bank is extending a credit of US$32 million to the Government of Saint Lucia for the Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project (DVRP), which is co-financed by a US$15 million loan and a US$12 million grant from the Pilot Programme for Climate Resilience (PPCR) This funding aims to enhance vulnerability reduction and support post-disaster reconstruction in the health, education, and infrastructure sectors across the island Additionally, the PPCR resources focus on driving transformational change to achieve long-term climate resilience, implementing innovative strategies that can be replicated both in Saint Lucia and globally.

The DVRP aims to significantly reduce vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change impacts in Saint Lucia through a range of activities focused on institutional strengthening and training, alongside civil works to retrofit or protect national assets The project encompasses five key components: (1) Risk Reduction and Adaptation Measures; (2) Technical Assistance for enhanced assessment and application of disaster and climate risk information in decision-making; (3) the Climate Adaptation Financing Facility (CAFF); (4) the Contingent Emergency Response Component (CERC); and (5) Project Management and Implementation Support.

The DVRP was declared effective by the World Bank on November 13, 2014 and is being implemented over a five (5) year period which ends December 31, 2019,

A proposal is underway to secure additional financing of USD 8 million (EUR 5.74 million and SDR 1.16 million) to expand project activities under components 1 and 5, thereby improving the development impact and outcomes of the DVRP This additional financing will be supported by a grant from the European Development Fund (EDF) and recommitted IDA funds from a recently concluded project.

Hurricane Tomas Emergency Recovery Loan (P125205, Cr 48710-LC) Upon approval of the proposed AF, the total financing of the Project would increase from USD 68 million to approximately USD 76 million equivalent.

According to the Bank’s Environmental Assessment (EA) Policy (Operational Policy OP 4.01), the DVR project is classified as Category B, meaning that environmental impacts for the type of

The Climate Adaptation Financing Facility (CAFF) is a pilot initiative designed to enhance climate resilience by offering retail loans to eligible households and private enterprises These sub-loans aim to finance investments in climate adaptation, thereby strengthening assets and livelihoods against catastrophic hydro-meteorological events The primary goal is to establish an affordable and self-sustaining loan portfolio dedicated to climate adaptation in Saint Lucia.

The Contingent Emergency Response Component (CERC) is a temporary mechanism that allows the Government of Saint Lucia to quickly access IDA funds for emergency recovery and reconstruction projects as outlined in a predetermined action plan This component facilitates the rapid re-categorization and reallocation of project financing to address emergency response costs in the aftermath of a disaster The anticipated work under this project is expected to be moderate and can be effectively managed through suitable engineering and management practices.

The updated Environmental Management Framework (EMF) enhances the existing guidelines for applying Bank safeguards, detailing screening methods, necessary study scopes for subprojects, and criteria for additional assessments for complex activities It includes a generic Environmental Management Plan (EMP) suitable for straightforward scenarios where further evaluation is unnecessary Most projects are expected to be minor civil works with limited environmental impacts confined to the construction phase, thus requiring only a standardized generic EMP However, any exceptions will be identified during the EMF screening process and will necessitate further assessment.

The project will involve comprehensive works across the island, focusing on the rehabilitation and reconstruction of existing road infrastructure, retrofitting key health and education facilities, and constructing new facilities It will also include geotechnical studies and engineering supervision for slope stabilization along critical roads and river defense works World Bank staff have conducted field checks and preliminary assessments of potential project locations through an Environmental Management Framework (EMF), which encompasses a top-level Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate the project’s environmental impacts at a program-wide level Furthermore, the EMF incorporates an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) with safeguards to facilitate the implementation of straightforward civil works that do not require additional assessments.

The Environmental Management Framework (EMF) serves as a vital tool for managing future subprojects under the DVRP and its Additional Financing (AF), as specific details of these projects are still being defined It includes general guidelines to identify and mitigate potential negative impacts, along with outlining statutory responsibilities An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) featuring standard mitigation measures has been developed and should be integrated into civil works contracts to guide contractors and facilitate monitoring during implementation Furthermore, any additional mitigation measures identified through Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) for complex subprojects, as well as any environmental requirements mandated by St Vincentian law, will be incorporated into performance criteria for contractors, ensuring compliance through ongoing monitoring.

Background

Saint Lucia faces significant challenges in its development due to the vulnerability of its population and economy to natural disasters These events can severely disrupt key sectors like agriculture and tourism, leading to detrimental effects on local communities and households The financial burden of natural disasters further strains the country's fragile economy and intensifies existing poverty levels.

The island's natural resources are vital for the country's economic future and should be integral to national resilience plans Development pressures and systemic issues have severely damaged critical infrastructure, housing, and livelihoods during disasters Poor land use, squatter settlements, and deforestation in disaster-prone areas have heightened vulnerabilities to climate change and related disasters Major human settlements and essential infrastructure, including telecommunications, roads, airports, and seaports, are concentrated along the narrow coastal belt, making them highly susceptible to extreme weather, sea level rise, storm surges, landslides, and flooding, which threaten livelihoods and socio-economic stability.

Landslides expose bare soil that is highly vulnerable to erosion, leading to significant siltation and potential flooding, which adversely impacts water intakes and the marine environment The complexity and scale of these landslides in Saint Lucia present substantial challenges, as the costs and technical expertise required for rehabilitation exceed local capabilities.

The proposed project will primarily involve small to mid-sized civil works that may have significant environmental impacts Key activities include retrofitting structures for enhanced disaster resilience, road and bridge construction or rehabilitation, potential road realignment, sea defense projects, and both building improvements and new constructions Several specific subprojects have been identified and prioritized, while additional potential subprojects remain unspecified, though the types of activities and civil works are recognized.

The potential environmental impacts of projects in Saint Lucia include effects on natural habitats and physical cultural resources Compliance with local environmental laws and adherence to World Bank safeguard policies is essential, particularly regarding environmental assessments (OP/BP 4.01), natural habitats (OP/BP 4.04), and physical cultural resources (OP/BP 4.11).

List and Description of Sub-projects

The following is a brief description of the approved sub project activities provided by the ProjectCoordinating Unit (PCU) Further detailed descriptions of each are provided in sections 1.3.1 through 1.3.20.

Table 1 List of Approved DVRP Sub-projects provided by PCU

Associated Works following Feasibility Study for the development of the Millet Intake

the Millet Intake within the John Compton Dam Raw Water Supply

Civil Works for Optimization of the Meteorological and Hydrological Monitoring

Improved Drainage Systems in Flood Prone Areas Island-wide (various small contracts island-wide) (MIPST)

(various small contracts island-wide)

Rehabilitation of Venus-Anse La Raye Road (MIPST)

10 Construction of Bridge to replace the existing Piaye Bridge (MIPST) MIPST

Associated Works following Comprehensive Flood Protection Study of Hewanorra

of Hewanorra International Airport its Environs and George F.L

Charles Airport and its Environs and associated works

Integrated Slopes, Landslides and Riverbank Stabilization Project (various small

(various small contracts island-wide)

Construction of Choisuel Secondary School (MOE)

22 National Hazard Mitigation Program Grass Roots Projects (Various activities TBD)

Site visits were conducted on May 1, 2, 3, 16, July 5, and August 25, 2013, to various locations, with supporting photographs provided in Appendix 2 Appendices 3 and 4 include a list of individuals interviewed for the project and participants from the initial multi-stakeholder consultation Additional site visits took place in June 2014 and November 2015 as part of the preparation for Additional Financing, during which discussions were held with stakeholders and agencies regarding the sub-projects.

1 The Retrofitting of 4 Community Centers/ Emergency Shelters (MOST)

Several community centres, including Roblot, La Fargue, and Piaye, have been selected for enhancements to serve effectively as emergency shelters This initiative focuses on improving these specific centres to ensure they can function as reliable emergency response locations when needed.

During a meeting with MOST staff on May 21, 2013, three additional centers in Blanchard and Babonneau were discussed Although these centers have the potential to serve as emergency shelters, their current dilapidated conditions hinder this capability The project aims to rehabilitate these centers to enhance their functionality as effective emergency shelters.

The Roblot Community Centre suffered significant damage during Hurricane Tomas, with its roof lost and the building exposed to rain for years, leading to dilapidated timber walls and floors infested with termites The Ministry has decided to demolish the structure instead of rehabilitating it In contrast, the La Fargue Community Centre has recently undergone rehabilitation and is in sound condition The Piaye Community Centre requires extensive renovations, including a roof replacement due to poor connections and termite damage, as well as the need for ring beams and structural support Additionally, while the Blanchard Community Centre was mentioned, no specific project details were provided, indicating it may be a potential future project.

2 Associated Works following Feasibility Study for the development of the Millet Intake within the John Compton Dam Raw Water Supply System)

The Millet Intake is a diversion dam located on an elevated tributary of the Millet River, designed to channel water via gravity to a treatment plant without any raw water storage Its yield varies significantly throughout the year, ranging from approximately 27,277 m³ (6,000,000 imperial gallons) to 4,546 m³ (1,000,000 imperial gallons) per day, influenced by seasonal changes Despite consistent catchment properties, variations in yield are primarily attributed to damage from Hurricane Tomas and ongoing siltation issues.

This proposal advocates for the Millet Intake to be reinstated as the main source of raw water, enhancing system redundancy and minimizing disaster risks By prioritizing the Millet Intake and designating the John Compton Dam as a secondary supply, there will be a notable decrease in power consumption at the dam due to the lower volume of water required for pumping.

3 Installation of Meters for Non-Revenue Water (NRW) Programme (WASCO)

The sub-project aims to procure and install specialized meters for WASCO, enhancing their ability to monitor water supply within the distribution system Addressing the issue of leaks, which have led to significant revenue loss, these advanced meters will play a crucial role in effective leak detection and management.

4 A preliminary structural report was commissioned by MOST to determine the condition of the community centres and to assist in the preparation of tender documents.

4 Civil Works for Optimization of the Meteorological and Hydrological Monitoring Network (MET)

This collaborative sub-project, involving the Water Resources Management Authority (WRMA) and the Meteorological Department, aims to install monitoring devices like rain gauges and check dams in streambeds The initiative will establish meteorological and hydrological stations along riverbanks across the island, benefiting communities such as Chateau Belair, Soufriere; Colombette, Soufriere; Bouton, Soufriere; and Bordelais, Dennery, with additional sites to be identified in Dennery.

5 Civil Works for Strengthening Sea Level Monitoring Network (MET)

This sub project is a joint project with Water Resources Management Authority and the Meteorological Department to enable installation monitoring devices for monitoring of marine conditions in some coastal areas

6 Improved Drainage Systems in Flood Prone Areas Island-wide (various small contracts island-wide) (MIPST)

The Ministry of Infrastructure, Ports, Services, and Transport (MIPST) plans to implement flood mitigation works in the Bois d’Orange watershed in Gros Islet and the Back a Dere watershed in Vieux Fort, excluding the Beausejour area Proposed initiatives may include the construction of river walls, installation of gabion baskets, and river retraining Currently, a consultancy is being organized to conduct an assessment study and develop designs and cost estimates for these proposed works.

7 Land Stabilization & Road Rehabilitation Post Tomas (4 packages) (MIPST)

This subproject focuses on the construction of the Venus – Anse La Raye bypass link road, which suffered nine landslides during Hurricane Tomas Currently, there are no plans for bridge construction, and detailed designs are yet to be finalized The project may include the construction of retaining walls for slope stabilization and protection of the road infrastructure Additionally, civil works are being considered for roads at Bois Cahet in Castries, Tet Chemin, and Morne du Don, where tension cracks have been observed.

On July 10, 2013, Mr Thomas August, the Director of Meteorological Services, announced a collaborative project with the Water Resource Management Authority (WRMA) to maximize benefits, as highlighted by WRMA Director Mr Michael Andrew during a meeting on June 23, 2013.

Engineer Laurna Raoul, a project engineer under the DVRP and part of the MISTP, was instructed by the Chief Engineer of MIPST to collaborate with a consultant This involved providing comprehensive information regarding various MISTP projects and conducting site visits These meetings and site visits took place over several days, spanning from May 16 to August 21, 2013.

8 Rehabilitation of Choc Bridge (MIPST)

Rehabilitation works are proposed for the Choc Bridge between Castries and Gros Islet which will involve the construction of a new bridge with new lanes and support footings.

Preparations are underway for the bridge project, with a bypass route already identified The design consultant has submitted the plans to the Ministry for review, and the final design option is yet to be determined Additionally, a hydraulic study is still pending.

9 Rehabilitation of Venus-Anse La Raye Road (MIPST)

The Venus – Anse La Raye Road has suffered severe damage due to two significant landslides, exacerbated by deep slopes and inadequate road foundations, rendering it impassable for vehicles Additional Financing will support the rehabilitation and potential realignment of approximately 8.2 km of this critical tertiary road, which serves as the sole connection between two communities, provides primary access to Anse la Raye Primary School, and is essential for reaching a WASCO storage tank and secondary treatment plant The project will address issues such as soil erosion, unstable slopes, and drainage silting, particularly to mitigate risks during the rainy season.

10 Rehabilitation of Piaye Bridge (MIPST)

The Piaye Bridge is 24.38m long with a 4.2m road width It has been destroyed twice in the last 30 years: first by Tropical Storm Debby in 1994; and recently by the December

2013 floods that affected the entire island During the passage of the Trough December

In 2013, the Piaye Bridge was washed away, resulting in a 15-day closure of access To address this issue, a temporary single-lane bailey bridge was installed and became operational on January 6, 2014 The original damaged bridge remains unreplaced and is highly susceptible to climate change impacts MIPST personnel have indicated that the bridge is at significant risk from rainfall events with a 25-year recurrence period or greater, and future weather-related events, including tropical storms, could further compromise the infrastructure.

National Hazard Mitigation Program Grass Roots Projects (Various activities TBD) (NEMO)

Potential Future Sub-projects

Proposed interventions by agencies like SLASPA hinge on available funding and necessitate collaboration among stakeholders The Ministry of Social Transformation has prioritized the Piaye and Roblot Community Centres Following discussions with the National Emergency Management Organization (NEMO), it is advised that a detailed plan be developed to guide the sub-projects.

Regulatory Framework

In Saint Lucia, various government and statutory agencies are tasked with environmental management under different legislations, leading to overlapping responsibilities For instance, landslide rehabilitation is fragmented; the Ministry of Infrastructure oversees road and settlement issues, while the Forestry Department manages landslides in Forest Reserves Additionally, private landowners are responsible for landslides on their properties, although the Ministry of Agriculture's engineering division offers support to farmers impacted by such events.

This article offers an overview of the agencies, laws, and regulations related to environmental management and disaster mitigation, addressing areas such as land use, water management, waste management, public health, and cultural heritage Despite these efforts, environmental management has often been fragmented, hindered by a lack of coordination, insufficient legislation, and limited financial and technical resources.

Table 2 below summarizes a number of pertinent agencies, their responsibilities, and enabling legislation.

Table 2 Agencies with Environmental Management Responsibilities

The Ministry oversees the management of the country's natural resources through its various departments and sections The Physical Planning section serves as the technical arm of the Development Control Authority (DCA) Additionally, the Ministry is tasked with implementing the Saint Lucia Building Codes and guidelines, which are designed to promote best practices in construction.

The Physical Planning and Development Act No 21of 2001

The Board of the Development Control Authority the power to review and decide on development proposals that are brought

The Physical Planning and Development Act No

On May 15, 2013, a meeting was held with Adam Toussaint, the Deputy Chief Forestry Officer, facilitated by the technical secretariat of the Ministry of Physical Development This meeting focused on the relevant legislation that empowers the development of land, assesses environmental impacts, grants development permissions, and regulates land use along with related matters.

2005) which superseded the 1971 Land Interim Development Control Act

Amendments to the 1971 Land Interim

The Environmental Health Department is tasked with reviewing plans and enforcing public health and sanitation regulations It promotes awareness of health-related practices, including food preparation, sanitation, waste management, air and dust pollution, and water quality, along with addressing certain occupational health and safety issues.

Public Health Act of 1975 and attendant Regulations to present.

16, 18, 20, 21, and 22 of 1978]: Public Health [Nuisances] Regulations. Public Health [Offensive Trades] Regulations: Public Health [Communicable and Notifiable Disease] Regulations:

Public Health [Water Quality Control]

Public Health [Apartment Houses, Guest Houses and Hotels]

Public Health [Swimming Pools] Regulations: Public Health [Disposal of Offensive Matter] Regulations:

Public Health [Sewage and Disposal of Sewage and Liquid

Pesticides Control Board (in the Ministry of Agriculture)

Pesticides Control Board in the Ministry of Agriculture and is responsible for monitoring the importation and use of various chemical substances.

The Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Control Act 1975

The Saint Lucia National Trust is a statutory organization dedicated to the conservation and management of historically and architecturally significant buildings, as well as natural and scientifically important areas Its primary responsibility is to protect and promote the country's cultural heritage and patrimony.

Pigeon Island National Landmark, the Praslin Protected Landscape, and the Maria island and Frigate Island Nature reserves

The statutory authority is tasked with overseeing a comprehensive and systematic approach to waste management, which encompasses the collection, treatment, disposal, and recycling of all waste types, including hazardous materials Additionally, the authority manages two sanitary disposal sites located in Deglos in the north and Vieux Fort in the south.

The St Lucia Solid Waste Management Authority Act No 8 of 2004,

Food Production, Fisheries, and Rural Development

The Ministry oversees extensive management duties concerning conservation and resource management The Forestry Department is tasked with the stewardship of terrestrial ecosystems, focusing on flora and fauna within designated reserves on both public and private lands, including forest reserves and water catchment areas, while also promoting public awareness Similarly, the Fisheries Department is dedicated to the coastal marine environment and plays a crucial role in educating fishers, in addition to managing certain riverine ecosystems.

Forest Soil and Water Conservation Ordinance

Fisheries Act 1984 Wildlife Protection Act 1964

The Ministry is tasked with the development and upkeep of essential infrastructure, including roads and drainage systems, throughout the state Additionally, it oversees the licensing for sand extraction from coastal regions The Ministry also manages technical services related to communications, meteorology, transportation, electrical safety, and the maintenance of hydraulic, building, and utility infrastructures.

The Chief Engineer represents the Ministry on the Development Control Authority and the National Emergency

Motor Vehicle and road Traffic Act 2003

The Ministry of Public Service, Sustainable Development, Energy, Science and

The government of Saint Lucia, through the Sustainable Development, Energy, Science and Technology Section, is responsible for monitoring international environmental commitments, including the Climate Change Convention (UNFCC) As the country's leading environmental agency, it ensures adherence to various protocols and spearheads key initiatives such as the National Environmental Policy (NEP), National Environmental Management Strategy (NEMS), and the National Climate Change Committee (NCCC) Additionally, the agency addresses issues related to biodiversity, pollution, energy efficiency, and sustainable development.

The Caribbean Public Health Authority (CARPHA), formerly known as the Caribbean Environmental Health Institute, serves as a key CARICOM institution focused on water quality and pollution control It plays a vital role in testing and quantifying various pollutants in coastal waters, establishing effective monitoring and control measures as part of comprehensive water quality programs CARPHA collaborates with the Ministry of Health and other governmental agencies, as well as private sector entities, to provide essential testing and analysis services Equipped with a state-of-the-art laboratory, CARPHA is well-prepared to fulfill its mission in safeguarding the region's water resources.

The Ministry of Health depends on the Caribbean Environmental Health Institute (CEHI) for various analytical tasks, while CEHI also offers technical assistance and support for water resource management initiatives.

The National Emergency Management Organisation (NEMO) is dedicated to safeguarding the people of Saint Lucia from the impacts of both natural and man-made disasters, including hurricanes, landslides, oil spills, and fires NEMO's key responsibilities involve developing, testing, and implementing effective measures to enhance preparedness and ensure a coordinated response to emergencies, ultimately protecting the population from physical, social, environmental, and economic repercussions.

(Disasters) Act No 5 of1995 prevention, mitigation and response actions.

NEMO oversees the development and administration of the National Emergency Management Plan and chairs the National Emergency Management Advisory Committee, which assembles during national emergencies.

Saint Lucia National Trust The Trust is a statutory body established in

Established in 1975, the Trust is dedicated to safeguarding and promoting both natural and cultural heritage in Saint Lucia It oversees significant sites, including the historical Pigeon Island National Landmark and the Maria Islands Nature Reserve Additionally, the Trust has created a System Plan for Saint Lucia and is actively working to document and preserve the island's architectural heritage.

World Bank Safeguard Policies

The World Bank's projects are guided by Operational Policies (OP) that ensure economic, financial, social, and environmental viability Among these are specific safeguard policies, including Environmental Assessments, aimed at preventing unintended negative impacts on third parties and the environment These safeguards cover areas such as natural habitats, pest management, cultural property, involuntary resettlement, indigenous peoples, dam safety, projects on international waterways, and initiatives in disputed regions.

The World Bank implements an environmental assessment policy to identify, avoid, and mitigate potential negative impacts of its lending operations This process is detailed in the Bank's Operational Policy (OP) and associated procedures.

The BP 4.01 Environmental Assessment policy serves as the overarching framework for the Bank's environmental safeguard policies These include essential guidelines such as Natural Habitats (OP 4.04), Forests (OP 4.36), Pest Management (OP 4.09), Physical Cultural Resources (OP 4.11), and Safety of Dams (OP 4.37), ensuring comprehensive environmental protection and management.

Under OP4.01, the Bank will conduct environmental screening for each proposed project to establish the necessary extent and type of Environmental Assessment (EA) Projects are categorized into one of four classifications based on their type, location, sensitivity, scale, and the potential environmental impacts they may have.

A project is classified as Category A when it is expected to cause significant adverse environmental impacts that are sensitive, diverse, or unprecedented These impacts can extend beyond the immediate sites or facilities involved in the physical works The Environmental Assessment (EA) for a Category A project evaluates both the potential negative and positive environmental effects, while also comparing them to feasible alternatives.

In a "without project" scenario, it is essential to identify measures that can prevent, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for negative impacts while enhancing environmental performance For Category A projects, the borrower must prepare a report, typically an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or a comprehensive regional or sectoral Environmental Assessment (EA), which includes necessary elements from other relevant instruments.

9 Source: http://www.worldbank.org/opmanual

10 Source:http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTSAFEPOL/0,,contentMDK:20507440~pagePK:64168427~piPK:64168435~theSitePK:584435,00.html

Category B projects are those with potential environmental impacts that are less severe than Category A projects, focusing on specific sites and typically allowing for easier mitigation measures While the scope of Environmental Assessments (EA) for Category B varies, it remains narrower than that of Category A These assessments evaluate both negative and positive environmental impacts, recommending strategies to prevent or minimize adverse effects and enhance overall environmental performance The outcomes of Category B EAs are documented in the Project Appraisal Document and Project Information Document.

Category C projects are designated for those anticipated to have minimal or no negative environmental impacts These projects require no further environmental assessment actions beyond the initial screening process.

• Category FI : A proposed project is classified as Category FI if it involves investment of

Bank funds through a financial intermediary, in subprojects that may result in adverse environmental impacts 11

The DVRP project has been classified as a Category B project, indicating that while it does not have major negative environmental impacts, it may involve civil works with minor to moderate effects To mitigate potential negative impacts from the project's components, the implementation of appropriate management and mitigative measures is essential.

The World Bank's Safeguard Policy OP 4.01 mandates the preparation of an Environmental Management Framework (EMF) and an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to address environmental assessments (EA) This report outlines the potential impacts of the project, while the EMF offers guidelines for evaluating future project impacts, and the EMP details the necessary mitigation measures.

The World Bank Safeguard Policies related to natural habitats, physical cultural resources, pest management, and forests may be relevant for future projects within the DVRP program These policies are summarized briefly below.

The World Bank's Operational Policy 4.04 on Natural Habitats emphasizes the importance of preserving biodiversity and the essential environmental services that natural habitats offer to humanity This policy establishes strict guidelines for World Bank-supported infrastructure and development projects, ensuring that they consider the conservation of natural ecosystems.

11 Source:http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTOPMANUAL/0,,contentMDK:2006 4724~menuPK:64701637~pagePK:64709096~piPK:64709108~theSitePK:502184,00.html

12 Source: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTSAFEPOL/0,,content

Bank-supported projects have the potential to harm natural habitats, including vital land and water areas that sustain native plant and animal species As a precautionary measure, this policy has been implemented to ensure the adequate protection of any affected natural habitats.

The OP/BP 4.11 policy on Physical Cultural Resources aims to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts on cultural resources resulting from World Bank-funded development projects These resources are vital for preserving historical and scientific knowledge, contributing to economic and social development, and reflecting a community's cultural identity The loss of such resources is often irreversible, yet frequently avoidable Physical cultural resources encompass movable or immovable objects, sites, structures, and landscapes with archaeological, historical, architectural, or aesthetic significance, found in both urban and rural environments, above or below ground, and even underwater Their cultural importance can be recognized at local, provincial, national, or international levels This policy is implemented as a precautionary measure to ensure the protection of any "chance finds" or other significant cultural resources.

Operational Policy 4.09 on Pest Management aims to prevent the use of harmful pesticides in rural development and health sector projects by promoting Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques The Bank mandates that any pesticides it finances must meet specific manufacturing, packaging, labeling, handling, storage, disposal, and application standards It does not finance products in WHO classes IA and IB or certain Class II formulations if the country lacks restrictions or if they are accessible to untrained individuals This policy is activated when subprojects may involve minor pesticide use through licensed contractors, such as termite treatments Significant pesticide purchases are excluded from the Environmental Management Framework (EMF) through screening and standard contract clauses, eliminating the need for a separate Pest Management Plan, as relevant procedures are integrated into the generic standardized Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Subprojects requiring significant pesticide use are screened out and are not eligible under the DVRP, except for incidental uses like termite control by licensed professionals.

Review of Relevant Legislation

The Development Control Authority (DCA) and the Ministry of Infrastructure are key agencies involved in projects aimed at reducing disaster vulnerability and ensuring environmental safeguards The Physical Planning Department of the Ministry of Physical Development serves as the technical executive for the DCA.

The Physical Planning and Development Act (No 29, 2001) governs the Development Control Authority (DCA) and the Physical Planning Section, serving as a key piece of legislation for environmental management This act outlines the requirements for Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) for specific activities, as detailed in Section 2(2), Section 2(3), Section 22, and the fourth schedule.

The Planning Department is empowered by this legislation to oversee land development, assess the environmental impacts of such developments, grant permissions for land use, and regulate land utilization along with related matters.

The Physical Planning Section of the Ministry adheres to legislation that requires an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for specific developments Following the EIA, the report is distributed to various referral agencies, including other relevant agencies and statutory bodies involved in environmental management These agencies, which contributed to the study's Terms of Reference, will evaluate the report's adequacy and may provide additional recommendations as needed.

The Development Control Authority (DCA) is responsible for making the final decision on proposed development applications and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) They may approve the EIA, taking into account the recommendations and measures from both the DCA and the referral agencies.

The Development Control Authority (DCA), established under the Physical Planning and Development Act No 29 of 2001, is responsible for reviewing and approving all state development projects Comprising a government-appointed Board with diverse professional expertise, the DCA includes the Chief Engineer of the Ministry of Infrastructure or their representative Certain applications, such as repairs to roads, bridges, and harbor installations, are exempt from this approval process, as detailed in Schedule 3 of the Act.

Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are mandated by Section 22 of the Act, with a detailed list of projects requiring an EIA for approval outlined in Schedule 4 of the Act.

The Ministry of Infrastructure is tasked with the construction and management of significant infrastructure projects, including road and bridge construction, particularly in disaster situations They believe these activities are exempt from the DCA's approval under the Planning Act’s third Schedule This has led to institutional tension, as the DCA insists that the Ministry should seek approval for these projects to ensure compliance with planning and environmental standards, while the Ministry maintains that such approval is unnecessary Consequently, the Ministry continues to carry out major works, especially post-disaster, in a manner they deem suitable.

The Chief Engineer's position on the DCA Board allows him to update the Board on various projects as a courtesy While the Ministry of Infrastructure may request an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for consultant-led projects, it typically does not require one for initiatives conducted internally within the Ministry.

The DCA is tasked with monitoring development projects to assess the developer's compliance with approved conditions However, challenges arise in this process, particularly concerning the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), as other agencies face their own mandates, significant workloads, and tight deadlines.

In a meeting with Engineer Laurna Raoul, the Ministry of Infrastructure expressed its stance on project approvals, asserting that there was no need to submit certain works to the DCA, a point of contention for some DCA staff During a subsequent meeting on June 27, 2013, Deputy Permanent Secretary Mr Lew acknowledged that this issue would be addressed soon at both the DCA Board and technical levels Despite the chief engineer of the Ministry of Infrastructure being a member of the DCA Board, the Ministry continued to seek project approvals Hildreth Lewis reiterated that the matter would be resolved in the near future, while discussions with DCA officials, including Executive Secretary Ms Agustin and Deputy Chief Planner Mr Desir, echoed similar concerns about the approval process.

The DCA and the Ministry of Infrastructure must collaborate closely, recognizing their shared responsibility for the nation's welfare By fostering this understanding, the Ministry can efficiently submit plans and environmental statements to the DCA for prompt review, allowing for timely recommendations It is essential for the DCA to prioritize these projects, ensuring they receive the necessary attention for the benefit of the public.

Environmental Management Capacities

Management agencies face challenges due to overlapping and unclear responsibilities, hindering effective environmental management Limited trained staff, insufficient technical and financial resources, and a lack of coordinated efforts further exacerbate these issues A questionnaire was distributed to various agencies, including the Environmental Health Department, Ministry of Physical Development, Development Control Authority, NEMO, Ministry of Sustainable Development, Ministry of Infrastructure, Fisheries Department, and Ministry of Social Transformation, to assess their capabilities The results, detailed in Appendix 7, support these findings.

Due to their heavy workloads and tight deadlines, most agencies struggle to independently monitor and uphold environmental safeguards Therefore, adopting a collaborative strategy through a small multidisciplinary team may prove more effective in managing projects and ensuring that essential environmental protections are integrated and sustained.

Saint Lucia General context

Saint Lucia, a small island developing state in the Caribbean, is situated at 13°53’0”N and 60°58’0”W, nestled between Saint Vincent to the south and Martinique to the north Covering an area of approximately 616.4 km² (238 square miles) and home to around 169,000 residents, the island features a mountainous terrain with a lush forested interior, all under a tropical climate The majority of its communities are found along the coastline, with the largest population concentrated in the northern region of the island.

Geology

St Lucia is part of the wider Antillean Arc of islands that are geologically young, not more than

The region is approximately 50 million years old and primarily formed from volcanic activity Although significant tectonic processes have largely stopped, minor geological activity persists, as shown by the dormant Soufriere volcano and the presence of near-surface hydrothermal hot spots.

St Lucia is predominantly volcanic, featuring ancient rock formations primarily composed of rhyolite, andesite, and various basalts that date back to the Early Tertiary period These rock formations are classified into three main series: the northern series from the early Tertiary (Eocene), the central series from the middle Tertiary (Miocene/Pliocene), and the southwestern series from the Holocene (mid to late Pleistocene).

Topography

St Lucia features a mountainous landscape, highlighted by the south-central mountain range that culminates in Mount Gimie, which rises to 3,117 feet (950 meters) This range extends irregularly for about 15 miles (24 km) and is characterized by deep gulleys and valleys The land slopes down to the coast on both the western and eastern sides, leading to deep canyons and expansive valleys with perennial streams, flat alluvial plains, and ultimately the sea The northern, central, and eastern regions exhibit a softer topography due to their older geological age, erosion, and weathering Notable valleys such as Marquis, Choc, Cul de Sac, Roseau, Mabouya, Fond d’Or, and Troumassee are key agricultural zones The average elevation in the upper regions is around 900 feet (274 meters), dominated by significant peaks like La Sorciere at 2,221 feet (677 meters) and Piton Flore at 1,850 feet (564 meters).

Figure 1 Location Map of Saint Lucia

14 2012 Mid year population estimate from 2012 fact sheet from the Central Statistics Office, Castries, St.Lucia

15 Organization of American States, Saint Lucia Development Atlas Department of Regional Development, OAS General Secretariat, Washington D.C USA 1987

16 The Caribbean conservation Association St.Lucia Country Environmental Profile St Michael, Barbados 1991

Figure 2 Relief Map of Saint Lucia

The west and southwestern regions of the country feature rugged, steep mountainous terrain, highlighted by the Pitons of Soufriere, which rise over 2,000 feet and are part of a large caldera that includes the town of Soufriere and Soufriere Bay This southwestern area, stretching from Gros Piton to Mount Grand Magazion and down to Vieux Fort, boasts an extensive flat plain that leads to the sea, characterized by deeply cut, narrow gorges that reflect the region's ancient geological history Vieux Fort is situated within this flat sandy expanse.

Climate

Saint Lucia experiences two distinct seasons: a dry season from December to May and a wet season from June to November The wet season coincides with hurricane season, making the island particularly susceptible to hurricanes and tropical storms Recent observations indicate that these seasonal patterns are becoming less defined, likely due to the impacts of global climate change.

Saint Lucia experiences significant variations in annual rainfall, with the wet central mountainous interior receiving up to 250 inches, while the drier coastal regions receive around 60 inches This disparity is primarily attributed to the orographic effect, influenced by the island's topography, which features a prominent central mountain range and lower coastal areas.

The island boasts a pleasant climate, with average temperatures around 27°C, peaking at 32°C and dropping to about 22°C in the cooler mountainous areas from November to January Humidity remains consistently high at around 70% throughout the year, reaching its peak during the warmer months The island experiences northeast Trade Winds, predominantly blowing from the east, with stronger winds typically observed during the dry season.

Human Settlement

St Lucia's historical settlement patterns have developed along flat coastal regions near major rivers, particularly in the north, where cities like Castries, Gros Islet, and Babonneau are located within the Northwest Urban Corridor As the population has grown, urban areas have expanded into the surrounding hillsides, leading to the emergence of unplanned suburban settlements This urban sprawl is primarily driven by rural-urban migration, with many lower-income households residing in vulnerable hillside areas These settlements often suffer from inadequate drainage and unplanned sewage systems, increasing their risk of landslides and hurricane exposure.

Geohazards

Saint Lucia faces significant risks from natural hazards including hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, droughts, tsunamis, flooding, and landslides These risks are heightened by human activities such as deforestation, improper waste disposal, inadequate construction practices, and the development of unplanned settlements in vulnerable environmental zones.

The increasing intensity of weather events due to climate change is heightening the risk of disasters, which strains St Lucia's limited technical and financial resources Hurricane Tomas exemplified this challenge, alongside severe droughts in 2002 and from 2009 to 2010, which significantly impacted the national water supply To mitigate the loss of life and property, it is essential for St Lucia to enhance its capacity to address and reduce vulnerability to these geological hazards.

Hurricane Tomas struck St Lucia in October 2010, highlighting the island's vulnerability to natural disasters The hurricane caused significant damage, including landslides, infrastructural destruction, and loss of life and property across various regions Major landslides and debris flows impacted key roadways and settlements, while forested areas suffered as well, jeopardizing essential water supply infrastructure Visual representations in Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the primary locations affected by the disaster.

Figure 3 Areas Affected by Hurricane Tomas 2010 - Central to North of Island

Source: GIS Section, Ministry of Physical Development, Housing, and Urban Renewal Sept 2013

Figure 4 Areas Affected by Hurricane Tomas 2010 – Central to south of Island

Source: GIS Section, Ministry of Physical Development, Housing, and Urban Renewal Sept 2013

Analysis of Projected Impacts

The activities associated with small to midsized civil works are expected to have minimal impacts Although none of the projects are located in historic or cultural sites, the rehabilitation of the WASCO intake may take place in a natural forest, necessitating careful management during reconstruction It is essential to implement relevant environmental management measures to mitigate any potential effects.

The social, cultural, historical, and socio economic impacts of these projects are being detailed in a separate social impact assessment document under another consultancy.

The project presents a mix of positive and negative impacts, as outlined in an impact matrix prepared by the PCU Notably, the capacity building and institutional strengthening initiatives are deemed environmentally benign, exhibiting no adverse effects A summary of these impacts is detailed in the table below.

Table 3 Impact Matrix of List of Projects initially provided by the PCU

Proposed activities Agency Possibilit y of Environ- mental Impact?

Environmental Impact Aspect, positive(+) or negative(-)

MIPSAT Yes 1 Potential poor construction and management practices leading to poor end products (-)

2 Air pollution from dust and vehicular / machinery fumes

3 Poor Solid waste management from works (-).

4 Potential resident and worker safety issues (-).

Effective management and supervision from implementation to completion can mitigate potential impacts, although some areas may experience significant effects if not handled properly, particularly within Forest Reserves or on highly erodible soils.

6 Disruption to natural habitat in Forest Reserve (-).

Ministry of Physical Developmen t/ SDED

5 GIS, Spatial Data management and sharing/ Geo Node activities

Ministry of Physical Developmen t/ SDED

Yes 1) Potential resident and worker safety issues (-)

3) Disruption to natural habitat in Forest Reserve (-).

Geographic information System to assist in reducing the risk to human and natural assets resulting from

8 To provide scientifically derived information to support decision making in developing a policy on Waste

WASCO Yes 1 Potential poor construction management practice issues (-)

2 Air pollution from dust and fumes from vehicles/ machinery (-).

Moderate but has potential to be significant if not properly scoped and works not properly implemented and managed; may require additional assessment to design best

3 Solid waste management issues, increased siltation of intakes and water supplies from works (-).

4 Potential resident and worker safety issues (-).

5 Potential disturbance and removal of natural vegetation (-)

6 Potential disturbance and removal of natural vegetation and damage to natural habitat in forest areas (-).

7 Impact on fauna via noise impact and presence of human activity (-). environmental management plan.

1 Potential poor construction management practice issues (-)

2 Air pollution from dust and fumes from vehicles/ machinery (-).

3 Solid waste management issues, increased siltation of intakes and water supplies from works (-).

4 Potential resident and worker safety issues (-)

5 Potential disturbance and removal of natural vegetation (-)

6 Potential disturbance and removal of natural vegetation and damage to

The potential impact on natural habitats in forest areas is moderate, but it could become significant if not properly scoped and managed To ensure effective implementation, additional assessments may be necessary to develop the most suitable environmental management plan.

7 Impact on fauna via noise impact and presence of human activity (-).

WASCO Yes 1 Potential poor construction management practice issues (-)

2 Air pollution from dust and fumes from vehicles/ machinery (-).

3 Solid waste management issues, increased siltation of intakes and water supplies from works (-).

4 Potential resident and worker safety issues (-)

5 Potential disturbance and removal of natural vegetation (-)

6 Potential disturbance and removal of natural vegetation and damage to natural habitat in forest areas (-).

7 Impact on fauna via noise impact and presence of human activity (-).

Moderate but has potential to be significant if not properly scoped and works not properly implemented and managed; may require additional assessment to design best environmental management plan.

12 Optimization of the meteorological and hydrological monitoring network

WRMA Yes 1 Potential poor construction management practice issues (-)

2 Poor solid waste management issues (-).

3 Increased siltation of intake from works within

Limited and manageable if works properly scoped, implemented, and managed. stream channels (-)

WRMA Yes 1 Change in forest land use or restriction to access (-).

Low but can be managed with good planning and coordination

Equipment to enhance capacity of

19 Integrated Slopes, landslides, and riverbank stabilization project

Yes 1 Potential issues from land disturbance through improper implementation methods/ practices (-)

2 Poor solid waste management issues (-)

3 Increased siltation of waterways from works (-).

4 Potential worker safety issues especially in snake areas or on steep or unstable slopes (-)

5 Potential disturbance of natural vegetation (-)

6 Impact on fauna through noise and presence of human activity (-).

Moderate but can be managed with good practices, experienced crew, and proper supervision from implementation to completion, including special care for activities within Forest reserves

20 Enhancing Coral reef MAFF- Yes 1 Changes to marine Insufficient Information

Recovery Fisheries ecosystems and natural habitat (-). at Present

21 Enhancing the capacity of the Fire

MIPST Yes 1 Potential poor construction management practices (-).

2 Air pollution from dust and fumes from vehicles / machinery (-).

3 Potential removal of natural vegetation and damage to natural habitat in forest areas (-).

While the impact is currently moderate, it could become significant if not adequately scoped and if the work is not properly implemented and managed An additional assessment may be necessary to address natural habitat concerns in order to develop the most effective environmental management plan.

MIPST Yes 1 Potential poor construction management practices (-).

2 Air pollution from dust and fumes from vehicles / machinery (-).

3 Potential removal of natural vegetation and damage to natural habitat in forest areas (-).

Moderate to low; environmental management plan sufficient

The significance of impact is determined by the detail of project activities, the intensity and size of proposed developments, and an evaluation of the existing environment While current estimates of potential impacts are based on available information, unforeseen methodologies or poor management practices during implementation could exacerbate negative effects Therefore, effective management and monitoring are essential to mitigate these risks.

Table 3 indicates that the majority of proposed activities involve small to midsized civil works, with anticipated negative impacts primarily occurring during the construction phases Projects identified as having no environmental impacts are excluded from further discussion in this report.

Although the projects are not taking place in historic or cultural sites, civil works may occur in natural forest areas, necessitating careful due diligence during implementation Currently, there are no established protocols or special policies to guide these activities One concern is the potential risk to workers in known snake-infested regions Given that the forest reserves likely represent natural habitats, additional assessment studies, such as a specific Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), may be required Furthermore, a detailed Environmental Management Plan (EMP) should be developed to outline specific conditions for these works.

A full EIA has been carried for the proposed Dennery polyclinic

The Venus - Anse La Raye Road project will pass through the sensitive Central Forest Reserve, which may host endemic wildlife, such as snakes, necessitating a focused Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and screening Given that the forest reserves likely represent Natural Habitat, additional assessments and a detailed Environmental Management Plan (EMP) may be required The unique soil conditions, characterized by loose, powdery volcanic deposits, pose risks of collapse, slope failure, erosion, and sedimentation, potentially impacting nearby rivers and their ecosystems Furthermore, it is crucial to protect the Water Intake Structure of WASCO, located downstream, from excessive sedimentation that could harm the intake and treatment plant These considerations will be integrated into the Additional Financing (AF) for the project.

The Marchand River Bank Stabilization project requires a final site clean-up to minimize the environmental impact of the civil works An environmental assessment, approved by the World Bank, was conducted as part of the Design Report The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and related measures from the approved Design Report have been included in the Bidding Document for the procurement of works.

The reconstruction of the Choc Bridge necessitates a comprehensive Environmental Assessment, guided by the Design Report, to formulate a detailed Environmental Management Plan (EMP) This evaluation will identify any mangrove zones that may be impacted, assess the presence of sensitive, endangered, or threatened species, and consider the indirect effects on the river mouth, adjacent beaches, and marine areas Additionally, an Erosion Control Plan will be developed, incorporating sedimentation controls and temporary river re-routing to mitigate direct riverbed work, alongside monitoring turbidity levels and establishing corrective measures A slope stability plan will ensure safe grading, support for deep trenches, and a revegetation strategy Finally, a Traffic Safety and Routing Plan will outline proposed bypass routes and necessary signage for both day and night during construction.

The EMP should include recommendations for works to be executed

The Piaye Bridge necessitates the development of an environmental management plan, which will be informed by an assessment of the river's mouth areas This plan will address erosion control, sedimentation management, and establish a traffic safety and routing strategy.

The project presents several potential positive impacts, primarily enhancing national safety by reducing vulnerability to disasters, which protects both property and lives Additionally, it generates employment and income during the construction phase and to a lesser extent in the operational phase, with a detailed analysis provided in the forthcoming Social Impact Assessment Each sub-project may also yield specific positive outcomes that contribute to these overarching benefits.

• Improving the access to health services by the upgrading and provision of health facilities as in the case of Dennery.

• Conservation of water in the case of the CEHI rain water harvesting project

The establishment of temporary job opportunities and sustainable income generation is crucial, particularly through various construction projects, including the rehabilitation of community centers and the development of road and river stabilization works.

• The provision of improved services such as water with the improvements to the WASCO intakes and provision of the new 1200m pipeline

• Improved learning environments and access to education as in the case of the new school at Dennery

• The provision of training as in the case of the capacity building project components such as in the case of the MET and WRMA projects.

Efforts to maximize the positive benefits of the works should be sought during design and implementation.

There is the possibility of the occurrence of the following negative impacts associated with the projects.

• Increased traffic and potential for traffic conflict

• Increased Vibration and Noise levels

• Poor Solid and Liquid Waste Management

• Marine pollution and impacts on marine habitats

• Soil erosion and land slippage

• Occupational Health and safety issues

• Loss of or damage to historical or cultural artifacts

The article outlines various impacts, with a detailed description provided below It will also highlight the Environmental Management Plan (EMP), which includes strategies to avoid, minimize, and mitigate any negative effects discussed later in the report.

4.1.2.1 Increased Traffic and Potential for Traffic Conflict

Mitigative Measures

Mitigative measures are essential for minimizing the environmental impacts of projects, particularly during the construction phase, where most negative effects are anticipated Although these impacts are not expected to be severe, implementing careful mitigative strategies will help reduce or eliminate adverse outcomes To ensure the technical and environmental integrity of the projects, thorough reviews by qualified professionals are crucial, with engineering assessments of all construction details and designs being a fundamental part of this process.

The identified general impacts are summarized, along with a list of potential mitigative measures presented in Table 4 These measures are designed for easy integration into an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and can be adapted into contract clauses for the contractor responsible for civil works, facilitating efficient monitoring.

Mitigative measures will be established based on the recommendations or conditions set by statutory agencies reviewing the sub-projects These measures may also be integrated into contractual clauses as needed.

The following Table 4 presents the potential impact areas and the proposed mitigative measures.

Table 4 Impact Areas and Mitigative Measures

1 Traffic impacts (a) A traffic management plan to be developed and implemented by contractor.

(b) Alternative routes to be identified in the instance of extended road works or road blockages

(c) The public to be notified of all disturbance to their normal routes

(d) Signposting, warning signs, barriers and traffic diversions must be clearly visible and the public warned of all potential hazards.

To ensure the safety of pedestrians during construction, it is essential to establish secure pathways and crossings where construction traffic disrupts their usual routes Additionally, trained and visible staff must actively manage traffic on-site or along roadways to facilitate safe and convenient passage for both vehicles and pedestrians.

(g) Adjustment of working hours to local traffic patterns, e.g avoiding major transport activities during rush hours or times of livestock movement.

2 Noise (a) Construction / work activities will occur within specified daylight hours e.g 8:00 am to 4:00pm

(b) Community / public to be informed in advance of any work activities to occur outside of normal working hours or on weekends.

(c) Sites should be hoarded wherever possible.

(d) During operations, the engine covers of generators, air compressors and other powered mechanical equipment shall be closed, and equipment placed as far away from residential areas as possible.

(e) There will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites.

(f) Noise suppression equipment or systems supplied by manufacture will be utilized.

(g) Ensure all vehicles and equipment are properly serviced.

(h) The contractor must develop and implement a public notification and noise management plan.

(a) Contractor to develop and implement waste management plan.

(b) Contractor to abide by all pertinent waste management and public health laws

Effective waste management for construction and demolition activities involves identifying specific collection and disposal pathways for all major waste types Appropriate bins will be utilized for the storage of construction and demolition wastes, while liquid and chemical wastes will be carefully stored in designated containers, ensuring they are kept separate from general refuse.

(f) All waste will be collected and disposed of properly in approved landfills by licensed collectors.

(g) The records of waste disposal will be maintained as proof for proper management as designed.

(h) Whenever feasible the contractor will reuse and recycle appropriate and viable materials (except asbestos).

Construction-related liquid wastes should be managed properly to prevent accumulation on or off-site, uncontrolled flow, and potential health risks or nuisances caused by their contents.

(a) Contractor must provide temporary storage on site of all hazardous or toxic substances in safe containers labeled with details of composition, properties and handling information

(b) The containers of hazardous substances shall be placed in an leak-proof container to prevent spillage and leaching.

(c) The wastes shall be transported by specially licensed carriers and disposed in a licensed facility.

(d) Paints with toxic ingredients or solvents or lead-based paints will not be used.

(e) Banned chemicals will not be used on any project.

(f) Any project activity which involves the purchase or use of significant amounts of pesticides (other than as described in (g) below) will be excluded during the screening process.

When implementing termite treatment, it is essential to use appropriate chemical management strategies to avoid contaminating nearby areas Only licensed and registered pest control professionals with the necessary training and expertise in proper application methods should be engaged for this task.

5 Solid and Liquid (a) If asbestos is located on the project site, it shall be marked clearly as a

(b) If work has already commenced, all work in the area must stop immediately

An asbestos management plan is required to be developed by the contractor and must receive approval from the appropriate local health and waste management authorities To reduce exposure risks, it is essential to properly contain and seal the asbestos and its location whenever feasible.

(e) The asbestos prior to removal (if removal is necessary) will be treated with a wetting agent to minimize asbestos dust.

(f) Asbestos will be handled and disposed by skilled & experienced professionals using appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) such as respirators and tyvec suites.

When temporarily storing asbestos materials, it is essential to securely enclose the waste in closed containers and clearly label them Additionally, implementing security measures is crucial to prevent unauthorized removal of asbestos from the site.

(i) No removed asbestos will be reused.

(a) The contractor must ensure that all persons handling medical wastes are provided with proper protective clothing.

(b) All medical wastes must be treated as hazardous.

(c) All medical wastes must be secured in specially labeled and sealed containers separate from other wastes streams

(d) All medical wastes must be disposed of according to relevant local legislation at specified disposal sites.

7 Deforestation (a) There must be no unnecessary clearing of natural vegetation.

(b) Avoid the use of herbicides or other chemicals.

(c) Any works to be undertaken in a protected forest area must be done under the supervision of a representative of the Forestry Department

(d) The contractor must ensure that any work undertaken in the forest reserve must be done by manual means.

To ensure environmental preservation, it is essential that the activity has minimal impact on the forest's flora and fauna Additionally, all recognized natural habitats, wetlands, and protected areas nearby must remain undisturbed and unharmed The contractor must enforce a strict prohibition on all staff against engaging in hunting, foraging, logging, or any other activities that could cause damage to the ecosystem.

A thorough survey and inventory of large trees near construction sites must be conducted These trees should be clearly marked and cordoned off with fencing to protect their root systems, ensuring that any potential damage is avoided during the construction process.

(i) There will be no unlicensed borrow pits, quarries or waste dumps in protected areas.

(j) Upon completion, all wastes must be immediately removed out of the forested area.

8 Air Quality (a) Construction materials such as sand, cement, or other fines should be kept properly covered

(b) Cement should be kept stored within a shed or container

(c) The sand and fines can be moistened with sprays of water.

(d) Unpaved, dusty construction roads should compacted and then wet periodically.

(e) During interior demolition debris-chutes shall be used above the first floor.

(f) Demolition debris shall be kept in controlled area and sprayed with water mist to reduce debris dust.

To minimize dust during pneumatic drilling and wall destruction, ongoing water spraying and the installation of dust screen enclosures at the site are essential Additionally, it is crucial to keep the surrounding environment, including sidewalks and roads, free of debris to further reduce dust levels.

(i) There will be no open burning of construction / waste material at the site. (j) There will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites.

(k) The bins of all haulage vehicles transporting aggregate or building materials must be covered on all public roads.

(a) The contractor must implement all necessary waste management plans and measures.

Proper storage of all construction materials, including chemicals, is essential The contractor will implement effective erosion and sediment control measures, such as hay bales, sedimentation basins, and silt fences, to prevent sediment runoff and minimize turbidity in adjacent streams, rivers, wetlands, and coastal waters.

Before construction in extensive coastal marine areas or near significant rivers and streams, it is essential to conduct water quality monitoring to assess turbidity levels and other quality parameters at regular intervals Additionally, it is important to implement measures to mitigate soil erosion and slippage.

(f) Construction vehicles and machinery will be washed only in designated areas where runoff will not pollute natural surface water bodies.

(a) The contractor must ensure that appropriate erosion control measures such as silt fences are installed

(b) Proper site drainage must be implemented (c) Any drain clogged by construction material or sediment must be unclogged as soon as possible to prevent overflow and flooding.

(d) The use of retaining structures and planting with deep rooted grasses to retain soil during and after works must be considered.

(e) The use of bio-engineering methods must be considered as a measure to reduce erosion and land slippage.

(f) Keep angle of slopes within limits of soil type.

(g) Balance cut and fill to limit steepness of slopes.

(h) All slopes and excavated areas must be monitored for movement.

(a) The contractor must ensure that an Occupational Health and Safety Plan is in place to guide work activities, and provide a safe environment for workers.

(b) The contractor must ensure that all workers operate within a safe environment.

(c) All relevant Labour and Occupational Health and Safety regulations must be adhered to ensure worker safety

(d) Workers must be provided with necessary equipment as well as protective gear as per their specific tasks such as hard hats, overalls, gloves, goggles, boots, etc.

(e) Sanitary facilities must be provided for all workers on site.

(f) The contractor must ensure that there are basic medical facilities on site and that there are staff trained in basic first aid

(g) Appropriate posting of information within the site must be done to inform workers of key rules and regulations to follow.

12 Loss of or damage to Historical and

The contractor is responsible for implementing measures to identify and document any artifacts or potential "chance finds" discovered during excavation or construction This includes notifying the appropriate authorities and adjusting work activities to accommodate these findings Additionally, workers are prohibited from removing or disturbing any items believed to be artifacts.

SCREENING PROCEDURES

This section of the report outlines the screening procedure for future work activities and subprojects within the Environmental Management Framework (EMF) Currently, the proposed works and their potential impacts are understood only at a general level The preliminary project descriptions and impact evaluations provided serve as a foundational starting point; however, details may evolve over time As specific actions are developed and physical works commence, it will be essential to assess their potential environmental impacts through a thorough screening process This will include identifying significant impacts that require additional evaluation and careful planning to manage effectively during project execution Consequently, this report provides guidelines, procedures, and protocols to guide the environmental management of future subprojects once they are sufficiently detailed for implementation.

Screening Processes

Each sub-project may have site specific issues that contribute to potential environmental impacts.

A screening mechanism and scoping exercise are essential tools for assessing officers to identify potential environmental risks early in the project identification cycle This approach facilitates the recognition of potential impacts and the development of mitigative measures, which can then be integrated as contract clauses for proposed small works While agencies like the Development Control Authority utilize a screening checklist, it often addresses a limited range of issues It is primarily during the scoping exercise that officers can identify the environmental ramifications of a project Several agencies, including the DCA, have acknowledged the need for a formalized screening instrument to better evaluate potential environmental concerns linked to specific project initiatives.

The Bank, as the main project sponsor, conducts an assessment to determine the potential environmental impact of sub-projects within the DVRP program This initial screening classifies projects as “Category B,” indicating manageable negative impacts through standard procedures, including a checklist to identify key impact areas Most sub-projects will fall under this classification; however, some may reveal significant environmental effects or complex management issues as details emerge In such cases, a separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is warranted, leading to the development of a tailored Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to effectively address the project's specific needs.

To streamline the assessment process, it is essential for the evaluating individual or agency to utilize a straightforward screening or scoping tool, such as a checklist, to identify potential red flags and initiate appropriate responses This user-friendly checklist aids the assessing officer in recognizing and evaluating potential impacts, thereby enhancing the overall decision-making process related to the proposed project and its activities The findings from the checklist will inform the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and suggest mitigative measures for any identified issues, potentially leading to further actions like impact analysis when necessary.

Local Permitting

The Development Control Authority (DCA) is the primary entity responsible for granting planning permits in Saint Lucia, relying on reviews from agencies like the Fire Service and Ministry of Health for various project types Construction projects, including commercial buildings and large subdivisions, must be certified by an engineer to ensure design integrity The DCA employs a checklist to evaluate developments and identify potential issues, although it does not specifically address environmental concerns The DCA refers to Schedule 4 of the Planning Act to determine the necessity of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), with officers capable of requesting an EIA based on their expertise and the project's environmental context Compliance with DCA regulations and environmental laws is mandatory for all projects under the DVRP, with additional criteria for World Bank projects regarding environmental considerations.

Screening Criteria and Checklists

The DVRP projects utilize screening criteria that focus on environmental considerations and identify relevant World Bank policy responses as needed Initially, it is essential to categorize proposed projects into two groups: those with complex environmental conditions or significant potential impacts that necessitate careful planning, and those involving simpler works with minimal effects, such as construction repairs, which can be managed with standardized mitigation measures.

There are several criteria to determine if a sub-project or activity is environmentally complex or may have potentially significant impacts if unmitigated These would include the following:

The potential impact on natural habitats (OP/BP 4.04) assesses whether specific activities or subprojects could affect land or water areas that support biological communities predominantly composed of native plant and animal species This evaluation focuses on regions where human activity has minimally altered the primary ecological functions, ensuring the preservation of these vital ecosystems.

The potential impact on physical cultural resources, as outlined in OP/BP 4.11, assesses whether a specific subproject or activity may affect objects, sites, structures, or natural features with archaeological, paleontological, historical, architectural, religious, aesthetic, or other cultural significance.

When assessing waste management, it is crucial to determine the potential for hazardous waste, including special categories such as waste solvents, asbestos, medical waste, and infectious or biohazard materials Additionally, the presence of radioactive materials must be evaluated to ensure proper handling and compliance with safety regulations.

The Project Coordination Unit (PCU) has adapted an existing checklist for screening small civil works from other projects to suit the specific sub-projects of the DVRP This modified checklist aims to help the PCU and proposing agencies assess whether a project may have significant environmental impacts or requires a more complex environmental assessment The proposed checklist is detailed in Table 5 below.

Table 5 Identification of Complex/Sensitive Sub-Projects or Activities

Characteristic of Sub-project or Activity: Yes/No Observations

1 Does the project involve construction of new roads, or major rehabilitation of existing roads?

17 Screening process and list prepared by the PCU Project ID and Environmental Tracking

2 Does the project involve dam construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or strengthening?

3 Does the project involve hazardous materials management and disposal (e.g asbestos, medical or infectious waste, solvents or gasoline) excepting small amounts normally used during construction?

4 Will the project significantly modify any coastal zone features, reef or marine features?

5 Could the project activities significantly affect any natural or protected areas or Forest Reserves located within 1 km of the

6 Could the project impact or affect the habitat of endangered species of plants or animals?

7 Could the project adversely affect critical resources such as drinking water diversions?

8 Could the project adversely affect natural waterways

(streams, rivers, or wetlands) by sedimentation, pollution, flooding, draining, or filling)?

9 Would the works adversely affect cultural property, including archeological and historical sites?

10 Would the works require leveling and clearing of lands with natural habitat (those water or land areas where most of the original plant and animal species are still present)?

11 Does the project involve the use of introduced, non-native species?

12 Does the project involve the use of pesticides, herbicides, or other agents to destroy pests? *

13 Does the project pose a high risk of causing landslides, slips, slumps, rock falls, debris-flows, or excessive erosion?

14 Will the project result in the violation of St Lucian law, international treaty, or Bank policy?

Projects that involve the purchase or use of large quantities of pesticides do not qualify for the DVRP Only incidental amounts used by licensed and registered professional contractors may be approved during the screening process when necessary.

Projects suspected of meeting specific criteria during the screening process may receive a positive determination; however, those involving significant pesticide use or triggering the Forest policy will be excluded This includes projects that impact forest health, affect local communities' rights and welfare, or alter natural forest management Additionally, any projects that could harm natural habitats or cultural resources, as outlined in the checklist, will necessitate a separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) For these sub-projects, the EIA must be completed before work begins, establishing environmental requirements through a tailored Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Draft Terms-of-Reference (TORs) to aid the Project Coordination Unit (PCU) in contracting and executing the EIA are provided in Annex 9, with support from World Bank staff for TOR preparation and EIA review.

The analysis of the DVRP sub-projects indicates that most are straightforward with minimal impacts Only a select few meet the criteria outlined in Table 5, warranting further examination As more precise details about these sub-projects become available, appropriate screening tools should be utilized to determine the necessity for additional assessment and planning.

Sub-projects and activities that do not meet the criteria outlined in Table 5 are deemed to have minimal environmental impact As discussed in Section 4, most minor civil works will result in limited impacts that can be effectively managed through standardized environmental controls reflecting best practices in construction For these straightforward environmental requirements, generic construction contract clauses are adequate and can be incorporated into construction contracts as necessary Draft language for these clauses is available in Annex 10, with additional details on the generic Environmental Management Plan (EMP) provided in Section 7 of this report.

Emergency Procedures

Component 4 of the DVRP is intended to provide financing for emergency sub-projects. Because most of the elements financed under Component 4 are likely to be related to emergency provision of critical goods, it is expected that those subprojects will fall into Category C and therefore would require no environmental screening or assessment work However, some Component 4 activities could include demolition, removal, repair or reconstruction of damaged public infrastructure, clearing of debris, or other activities which could have potential negative impacts if not mitigated, and would therefore fall into Category B It is even possible that there may be exceptional cases where a proposed sub-project would involve work in highly ecologically sensitive areas, potentially affect physical cultural resources, or require acquisition of substantial areas of land either temporarily or permanently for reconstruction work or relocation of a vulnerable population In order to ensure that Component 4 emergency subproject activities are consistent with the World Bank Safeguard Policies as outlined in thisEnvironmental Assessment & Environmental Management Framework document, the activities identified for financing under Component 4 will be subject to an expedited review by safeguards specialists to determine if they are eligible under the safeguard policies and compliance procedures used by the PCU for all activities financed under the DVRP This will allow the possibility to exclude certain activities if the environmental or social impacts are too great, or to include appropriate mitigation measures for a proposed activity if feasible Having the existing safeguards screening process in place will also allow a certain degree of flexibility and efficiency in processing potential subprojects or activities As is the case for the other components of theDVRP, sub-projects involving the purchase or use of significant amounts of pesticides (other than incidental amounts by licensed registered professionals) are not eligible under the component 4.

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This section outlines the connection between anticipated environmental impacts and the necessary mitigation measures identified during the screening and assessment process It also details the budgeting provisions for these measures and defines the responsibilities of individuals tasked with implementing them effectively.

Mitigative Measures

Mitigative measures for straightforward environmental management issues rely on best management practices and industry standards These measures are essential for all professional contractors engaged in civil works, establishing a baseline for environmental protection during project execution.

Most civil works in the DVRP, as outlined in Section 4 of this report, are straightforward and require only standard generic mitigation measures for environmental management These measures are detailed in Table 6, with further descriptions available in Table 4 under Mitigative Measures The generic environmental clauses in Appendix 10 will be incorporated into specific contract clauses for works with minimal impacts Table 6 also presents the elements of the standardized Environmental Management Plan (EMP), including monitoring responsibilities and timelines.

Table 6 Standard Minimum Elements of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

1 Rehabilitation or demolition of existing buildings

Air Quality As per mitigative measures (a) to (k)

Traffic Impacts As per mitigative measures (a) to (g)

Noise As per mitigative measures (a) to (h)

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (i)

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (hazardous)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (f)

Occupational Health and Safety Issues

As per mitigative measures (a) to (g)

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (Medical Wastes)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (d)

2 New Building and general construction

Air Quality As per mitigative measures (a) to (k)

Traffic Impacts As per mitigative measures (a) to (g) contractor Min Educ,

Noise As per mitigative measures (a) to (h)

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (i)

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (hazardous)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (f)

Occupational Health and Safety Issues

As per mitigative measures (a) to (g)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (f)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (h)

Loss of or damage to Historical and Cultural Artifacts

As per mitigative measures (a) to (b)

Deforestation As per Contractor Min Educ, weekly mitigative measures (a) to (j)

3 Road and drain construction and rehabilitation

Air Quality As per mitigative measures (a) to (k)

Pollution As per mitigative measures (a) to (f)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (h)

Occupational Health and Safety Issues

As per mitigative measures (a) to (g)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (f)

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (i) contractor MIPST,

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (hazardous

As per mitigative measures (a) to (f) contractor MIPST,

Traffic Impacts As per mitigative measures (a) to (g)

Air Quality As per mitigative measures (a) to (k)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (h)

Occupational Health and Safety Issues

As per mitigative measures (a) to (g)

Terrestrial and Marine As per Contractor MIPST, weekly

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (j)

Traffic Impacts As per mitigative measures (a) to (g)

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (hazardous

As per mitigative measures (a) to (f) contractor MIPST,

Deforestation As per mitigative measures (a) to (j)

Air Quality As per mitigative measures (a) to (k)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (h)

Occupational Health and Safety Issues

As per mitigative measures (a) to (g)

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (i) contractor WASCO,

Slippage As per mitigative measures (a) to (h)

Occupational Health and Safety Issues

As per mitigative measures (a) to (g) contractor Forestry,

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (j) contractor Forestry,

Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general)

As per mitigative measures (a) to (j)

Occupational Health and Safety Issues

As per mitigative measures (a) to (j)

The DVRP sub-projects are categorized based on the types of works and their associated impacts, as outlined in Table 6 These categories include rehabilitation or demolition of community centers and schools, new construction of structures like schools and warehouses, as well as road and drainage construction, river and bridge works, water intake and pipeline projects, and slope stabilization efforts Each category provides essential guidelines for selecting appropriate mitigative measures, which must be included in the contract documents for each project type.

If DCA approval has been obtained for a sub-project, it is essential to revise the generic minimum mitigative measures and monitoring conditions to incorporate the DCA's conditions and recommendations, along with those from any other relevant statutory agencies involved in the permitting process Additionally, if an EIA has been performed for the sub-project due to its environmental sensitivity or complexity, the specific mitigative measures outlined in that EIA must be integrated into the tailored EMP for the sub-project, alongside the standard minimum EMP measures.

7.2 Environmental Performance Clauses for Works Contracts

Standard environmental clauses are to be integrated into contracts based on the type of work and the checklist findings from the appraising project officer These clauses are essential components of the environmental management plan and include necessary mitigative measures They are derived from checklists utilized by the Project Coordination Unit (PCU) and the assessment of potential impacts from the proposed works While these clauses are general in nature, they can be tailored to comply with relevant Saint Lucian laws and contract procedures, remaining effective for the duration of the contract.

Generic contract clauses are provided in Appendix 10 for the following general conditions for small civil works, roads, buildings, and other works expected to have minor impacts:

• Worker Occupational Health and Safety

• Use and Management of Hazardous Materials, fuels, solvents and petroleum products

• Use and Management of Pesticides

• Use of Preservatives and Paint Substances

• Site Stabilization and Erosion Control

• Management of Solid Wastes -trash and construction debris

Additional clauses for the following special conditions are also within Appendix 10:

• Works in designated Forest Reserves

Generic clauses are anticipated to be included in all applicable contracts, with additional project-specific recommendations potentially provided by statutory permitting agencies like the DCA or the Ministry of Health, which can also be reformatted into contract clauses Furthermore, if an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been performed for a sub-project due to its environmentally sensitive or complex characteristics, the specific mitigative measures recommended in the EIA should be incorporated as contract clauses.

Contractors must recognize the importance of environmental mitigation measures and associated Environmental Management Plan (EMP) requirements when estimating costs and budgeting It is essential for them to incorporate relevant cost items in their proposals to ensure compliance and effective project planning.

Supervision, Monitoring, and Reporting

An integrated approach is essential for reviewing the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and monitoring projects throughout all phases, from pre-construction to post-completion The EMP aims to enforce best practices outlined in construction and operational contracts, ensuring that any potential environmental impacts are effectively mitigated.

The contractor is responsible for implementing the project on-site while adhering to contract clauses, recommendations, and mitigation measures Monitoring frequency will be set by the requesting agencies, ensuring it is sufficient to assess site changes, environmental conditions, and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies, as well as the contractor's capability to execute the work sustainably.

The Project Coordination Unit (PCU) is responsible for overseeing and monitoring sub-projects, with the capability to enlist support from other technical departments and ministries for technical oversight of civil works However, the PCU lacks sufficient staff to assess each sub-project or conduct extensive monitoring, necessitating that the requesting agencies or hired consultants utilize a checklist to report their findings to the DCA for review and approval All findings and approval conditions must be integrated into the project documents and contract clauses, and the agencies are expected to participate in the monitoring and reporting processes to bolster the PCU's efforts.

Environmental management in small island developing states like Saint Lucia requires cross-sectoral collaboration due to limited financial and technical resources The Project Coordination Unit (PCU) will oversee the DVRP project by handling evaluation, supervision, and implementation The Sustainable Development and Environment Division (SDED), as the primary environmental agency, will act as the project's technical advisory unit and involve other relevant ministries and departments to support effective project execution and long-term sustainability.

The PCU is responsible for ensuring the sustainability of various projects by facilitating DCA review and approval before implementation, particularly for sub-projects requiring a permit Timely reviews from the DCA are essential, as they must revert to the PCU within a set timeframe that aligns with the PCU's need for a quick turnaround to support efficient project execution.

Environmental compliance supervision will be overseen by the Project Coordination Unit (PCU), with ongoing technical support from the Bank A designated field representative from the PCU will carry out regular inspections to ensure adherence to environmental standards Beyond the Bank's requirements, the PCU is also tasked with enforcing national environmental regulations To enhance environmental oversight, the PCU may hire an additional environmental specialist or engineer to assist with field inspections.

The Environmental Management Framework (EMF) for the Parent project was made public on the Saint Lucia Government website on January 22, 2014, and on the World Bank website on January 15, 2014, following workshops with government agencies and stakeholders during the project's preparation The EMF was updated for Additional Financing (AF) to incorporate the Piaye Bridge, which has minor environmental impacts, and was re-disclosed in-country on March 16, 2016, as well as through the Bank’s Info shop on March 14, 2016 Other AF projects, such as the Anse La Raye Road and Millet Intake, were already evaluated and included in the parent project's EMF Additionally, it was noted that the Pest Management Policy was activated for limited pesticide use, specifically for termite treatment in building foundations, while projects involving substantial pesticide use are excluded through the screening process.

The majority of works contemplated involve the repair and retrofitting of existing infrastructure.

Stakeholder impacts during construction activities may involve temporary inconveniences; however, measures will be taken to minimize these disruptions To keep potentially affected individuals informed, advanced public notifications will be provided, and relevant line ministries will support the Project Coordination Unit (PCU) in these communication efforts.

Consulting stakeholders regarding the management of potential physical cultural resources is essential for informing the conceptual design of projects This is particularly important when dealing with antiquated or historically significant structures that may warrant preservation during the reconstruction or rehabilitation of schools, clinics, and similar facilities.

Subproject-specific Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) necessitate the identification of stakeholders and the conduction of public meetings to incorporate their concerns into project design These requirements are outlined in the Terms of Reference (TORs) for EIAs, particularly for projects with environmentally complex aspects or those impacting natural habitats, sensitive areas, or cultural resources Examples include SLASPA activities and initiatives within designated forest reserves, such as slope stabilization and water diversion projects Upon identifying specific interventions, EIAs will mandate full community engagement through meetings and consultations, ensuring that community feedback is integrated into the project design Additionally, plans for public engagement during the construction phase will be included in the assessment process, with a requirement to document public meetings and community engagement activities as part of the overall assessment and implementation program.

La Fargue Community Centre – conditions

Annex 3: Fact Gathering Interviews and Meetings

Agency Person Interviewed/ meetings Date

WASCO Mr John Joseph- Managing Director,

Mr Justin Sealy- Technical Services Supervisor,

Mr Ale Anthony- Sewage Services,

Mr Jim King- Southern Services Manager

WASCO Mr Justin Sealy- Technical Services Supervisor- site visit

MAFF Mr Adam Toussaint- Deputy Chief Forestry

MOST Mrs Joanna Reyenolds- Arthuton- Permanent

MOST Ms Velda Joseph- Deputy Director Community

MIPSAT/ DVRP Mrs.Laurna Raoul- Project Engineer 16 May, 2013

21 August 2013 MIPSAT Mr Nicholas Johnny – Project Engineer 19 June 2013 MAFF Ms.Allena Joseph – Fisheries Biologist 19 June 2013

WRMA Mr Micheal Andrew- Director WRMA 23 June 2013

WRMA Mrs Farzane Leon – Water resources Specialist 23 June 2013

NEMO Ms Dawn French- Director 26 June 2013

MPDHUR Mr Hildreth Lewis – Deputy Permanent

NEMO Ms Dawn French- Director 27 June 2013

MPSSEST Mr Crispin D’Auvergne- Chief Sustainable

MAFF Mrs Serita Willam Peter – Senior Fisheries

WRMA Mr Micheal Andrew - Director 28 June 2013

WRMA Mrs Farzane Leon – Water Resources Specialist 28 June 2013

Mr Cosmas Louis – Senior Planning Officer 27 June 2013,

19 August 2013DCA/ PPS- Ms Karen Agustin- Chief Planner /Executive 4 July 2013

Mr David Desir – Deputy Chief Planner 4 July 2013

CARPHA Dr Christopher Cox- Programme Manger/ technical coordinator

5 July 2013 SLFES Mr Leslie Fontenell – Chief Fire Officer 6 July 2013

MIPSAT Mr Thomas Auguste- Director of

MSDEST Mrs Dawn Pierre Nathaniel- Senior Sustainable

PCU Mrs Myrtl Drysdale – Procurement and M&E officer

SLASPA Mr Chedi Tobias – Chief Engineer,

Mr Cuthbert Nathaniel- Internal Project Auditor 22 July 2013 MHWHSGR Mr Margtus Henry – Project Building

CCE Mr Neil O Williams – Project Engineer –

Dennery Poly Clinic and Dennery New Hospital

MISTP Mr Dominic Mathurin – Director of Works,

Building Projects Unit, Ministry of Infrastructure

SLDC Mr Gavin Francis - Senior Development Loans

Annex 4: List of Participants Attending the Multi-stakeholder Consultation / World Bank Safeguards Seminar

Ministry of Infrastructure Conference Room – 20 th August, 2013

DCA/ MPDHUR - PPS Ms Karen Agustin Executive Secretary DCA/ Chief

DCA/ MPDHUR -PPS Mr David Desir Deputy Chief Planner

DCA/ MPDHUR -PPS Ovid Martyr Civil Engineer

MPDHUR -Arch Sectn Mr Agustin Poyotte Chief Architect

WRMA Mr Micheal Andrew Director

WASCO Mr Justin Sealy Technical Services Supervisor

SLDB Mr Gavin Francis Senior Development Loans

MSDEST Neranda Maurice Programme Officer

MPDHUR Jenny Daniel Chief Housing Officer

MIPST Laurna Raoul Project engineer

MIPST Rachel Skeete-Alexander Geo Soils engineer

MPDHUR Vincent Jn Baptiste Deputy Chief Surveyor

NEMO Ms Dawn French Director

PCU Mrs Myrtl Drysdale Procurement and M&E officer

PCU Ms Cheryl Mathurin Project Coordinator

Annex 5: Schedule 3 of the Physical Planning and Development Act of 2001- PERMITTED Development

(a) A Garden Huts, other than garages, in approved residential areas and not used for human habitation or for the conduct of any activity of a commercial nature.

(b) Gates, fences, and walls not exceeding 4 feet in height.

Agricultural outbuildings, which are not intended for human habitation, along with enclosures and necessary works on agricultural holdings, are essential for the effective use of land for agricultural purposes However, this definition excludes the subdivision of land specifically for agricultural use.

(d) Repair to roads, bridges and harbour installations

(f) Internal alterations to buildings not involving changes to the basic structure or faỗade of the buildings

Enlargements or improvements to an existing single dwelling house are permitted, provided they comply with regulations on minimum building setbacks, site coverage, and building height limitations Additionally, the floor area of the enlargement or improvement must not exceed one-third of the existing dwelling's floor area.

Annex 6: Schedule 4 of the Physical Planning and Development Act of 2001 Projects requiring an EIA

MATTERS FOR WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IS ORDINARILY REQUIRED

1 Hotels of more than the number of rooms specified in the Regulations;

2 Sub-divisions of more than the number of plots specified in the Regulations;

3 Residential development of more than the number of units specified in the Regulations;

4 Any industrial plant which in the opinion of the Head of the Physical Planning and Development Division is likely to cause significant adverse impact on the environment;

5 Quarrying and other mining activities;

7 Land reclamation, dredging and filling of ponds;

10 Hydro-electric projects and power plants;

13 Sanitary land fill operations, solid waste disposal sites, toxic waste disposal sites and other similar sited;

15 Any development projects generating or potentially generating emissions, aqueous effluent, solid waste, noise, vibration or radioactive discharges;

16 Any development involving the storage and use of hazardous materials;

18 Development in wetlands, marine parks, national parks, conservation areas, environmental protection areas or other sensitive environmental areas.

Could you provide me with a response to the following as part of my information gathering for the DVRP project Much appreciated

1 Under what legislation does your Ministry/ Agency operate?

2 What are the core functions of your agency/ ministry?

3 Does your Ministry consider itself an environmental or environmental management agency?

4 In what manner does your agency engage in Environmental Management?

5 How many staff does your agency / Ministry employ?

6 Are any of your staff are formally trained in Environmental Impact assessment (EIA)? If yes, how many and to what levels?

7 Are any of your staff are involved in environmental monitoring? If yes, how many?

8 Are any of your staff are involved in monitoring of construction / infrastructural projects?

9 Does your agency/ Ministry carry out environmental assessments for various types of projects including construction projects?

10 Does your agency assist other agencies in the execution of environmental activities such as monitoring of projects and environmental conditions?

11 Do you believe your agency has the full capacity (staff, equipment, etc) to undertake its environmental function if any such as compliance activities?

12 If no, what are your constraints?

13 Are there any constraints or deficiencies in the present legislation that prohibits or constrains you from undertaking your Agency’s environmental management functions?

14 Does the Ministry have any form of standard or documented Environmental guidelines or conditions that the Ministry staff or selected contractors have to abide by during the implementation of projects

15 Does your agency have any form of environmental screening procedures that it uses to assess the potential environmental impacts of projects proposed or potential mitigative measures?

16 If no, would a screening procedure such as a checklist be useful to your agency?

17 What would you like to see such an instrument contain or reflect to assist your functions?

18 Is there any additional information that you would like to contribute that would be useful to this assessment?

Annex 8: Project Screening Form from Development Control Authority

Enforcement/Stop/Abatement Notice Served: N.A

The developer is seeking DCA Approval.

Application no.: Type of approval: Date: Use:

Site Topography: Flat Gentle Moderate Steep

Site suitability: Good Fair unsuitable engineering works

Proposed Land Use : Acceptable Incompatible

Existing Access: (indicate width) Adequate Needs Upgrading to……

Proposed Access : Adequate Needs Upgrading to……

Parking Proposed : Functional y n Needs Improving (No.)

Proposed lot sizes: (range) Low Density Medium Density High Density

Open Space Provided: (amount) Adequate Inadequate

Existing Access: (width) Adequate Needs Upgrading to:

Services/Utilities: Water Electricity Sewage Garbage Disposal Transportation

Certified Drainage Plan submitted: Yes No Adequate Inadequate

Certified Drainage Details submitted: Yes No Adequate Inadequate

Road Intersection Details submitted: Yes No Adequate Inadequate

Splay Details submitted: Yes No Adequate Inadequate

Cul de Sac Details submitted: Yes No

Proposed Building Setbacks: North Adequate Required

Building Plot coverage: Adequate Inadequate

Permitted Room Density: Proposed density:

Full Approval with no conditions

Annex 9: Sample Terms-of-Reference (TORs) for Sub-project EIA

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR SERVICES TO CONDUCT AN

OF {PROJECT TITLE}, SAINT LUCIA Introduction.

{General Description of the Activity and need for EIA}

The project is classified as Category B under the Bank’s Environmental Assessment Policy [OP4.01], indicating that the anticipated environmental impacts are expected to be moderate These impacts can be effectively managed through suitable engineering and management practices.

{The purpose of this consultancy is to … }

{Describe setting and relevant attributes of the project and environs}

{Describe specific objectives of the EIA}

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) will adhere to World Bank standards, specifically OP 4.01 on Environmental Assessment It will also incorporate guidelines from Bank Safeguards OP/BP 4.04 regarding Natural Habitats and OP/BP 4.11 concerning Physical Cultural Resources.

{Describe Scope of EIA and limiting factors}

{Detail specific activities to be accomplished and known issues to be examined in addition to those to be discovered during the assessment}

At a minimum, the EIA will include the following:

1 Executive Summary of not more than 2 pages

2 Description of the proposed Sub-Project

- applicable environmental, land use, water management laws and regulations

- other applicable regulations or agency requirements

4 Description of the Existing Environment

{Add additional reporting as needed}