1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

Causes and Impacts of Institutional and Structural Variation Globalization in the Tobacco and Pork Industries

427 1 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Causes and Impacts of Institutional and Structural Variation: Globalization in the Tobacco and Pork Industries
Tác giả Ryan Denniston
Người hướng dẫn Gary Gereffi, Supervisor, David Brady, Bai Gao, Suzanne Shanahan, Kenneth I. Spenner
Trường học Duke University
Chuyên ngành Sociology
Thể loại dissertation
Năm xuất bản 2010
Thành phố Durham
Định dạng
Số trang 427
Dung lượng 4,49 MB

Nội dung

Causes and Impacts of Institutional and Structural Variation: Globalization in the Tobacco and Pork Industries by Ryan Denniston Department of Sociology Duke University Date: _ Approved: _ Gary Gereffi, Supervisor _ David Brady _ Bai Gao _ Suzanne Shanahan _ Kenneth I Spenner Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Sociology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 ABSTRACT Causes and Impacts of Institutional and Structural Variation: Globalization in the Tobacco and Pork Industries by Ryan Denniston Department of Sociology Duke University Date: _ Approved: _ Gary Gereffi, Supervisor _ David Brady _ Bai Gao _ Suzanne Shanahan _ Kennerh I Spenner An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Sociology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 Copyright by Ryan Denniston 2010 Abstract The most significant changes to the agricultural sector in the twentieth century include a sharp decline in employment and the numbers of farms, a decline in the proportion of total value that accrues to agricultural producers, and an increase in farm level and regional specialization Within the U.S., substantial differences in the characteristics of agricultural producers and the spatial distribution of production persist amid industry change These changes coincided with changes in global markets, domestic consumption, consolidation and concentration within the processing and retailing sectors, and government policy The causality that lies behind these developments is the key puzzle that this study addresses This study advances an institutional explanation of industry formation across locations within the U.S Differences in industry constitution at the local level produce different impacts of and responses to global markets, reflected by economic changes and policy developments, as actors work to secure stability and advantage in markets (Fligstein 2001) This study uses the global value chains’ definition of the industry, which incorporates the network of actors arrayed along a process of production, to capture the set of actors with the capacity to affect industry operation (Gereffi 1994) The primary objective of the study is an assessment of the relative importance of local economic characteristics, global markets, organization and coordination within industries, and government policies to where production locates A contrast along the key theoretical perspectives is provided by the research site, the pork and non-cigar tobacco industries in strategic states within the United States from iv 1959 through Within-case comparison is used to construct causal narratives of industry change at the state level Panel and pooled time series analysis assess the relative importance the factors to agricultural change Local economic characteristics largely fade from significance with the inclusion of the theoretical perspectives Total and net trade in agricultural and manufactured products is generally significant across industries for production, although this is not the case for specific tobacco types The proportion of farms composed of small farms is significant for production and for farm structure in both industries The presence of manufacturers is significant for hog production but could not be assessed for the tobacco industry While federal policies are broadly significant for the tobacco industry, identified state policies exhibit few consistent effects for hog production Importantly, farm structure measures were only available for Census years, and the sample size for this analysis was reduced Second, many of the measures are industry-specific, which reduces comparability v Dedication This page is optional vi Contents Abstract .iv Dedication vi Contents vii List of Tables xii List of Figures xvii List of Abbreviations xviii Acknowledgements xx Introduction and Literature Review .1 1.1 The Research Problem 1.2 Literature Review 1.2.1 The General Theoretical Perspectives 1.2.2 Theoretical Concepts 12 1.2.3 Approaches in the Sociology of Agriculture 18 1.3 Research Argument and Expectations 30 1.4 Summary and Outline of the Study .35 Design, Data, and Methods 37 2.1 Case Selection 38 2.2 Data Compilation 43 2.2.1 Agriculture and Agricultural Production 44 2.2.2 Manufacturer Information .47 2.2.3 Trade and Consumption 49 2.2.4 State Policies and Institutions 53 2.3 Conclusion 56 vii The Structure and Operation of the Pork Industry .59 3.1 Industry Overview .60 3.2 Organization and Characteristics of the Hog Farming Industry 63 3.3 Hog Farming in the United States .68 3.3.1 The United States Context 69 3.3.2 Geographical Variation in Hog Farming, Selected States .73 3.4 Meatpacking and Pork Processing Characteristics 78 3.4.1 Meatpacking Characteristics in the United States 80 3.4.2 State Level Manufacturing Characteristics .84 3.5 Consumption and Trade .90 3.6 Conclusion 94 The Structure and Operation of the Non-Cigar Tobacco Industry .96 4.1 Industry Overview .97 4.2 Organization and Characteristics of Non-Cigar Tobacco Farming 103 4.3 Tobacco Farming in the Southern United States .107 4.3.1 The United States Context 107 4.3.2 Geographical Variation in Tobacco Farming, Selected States 111 4.4 Tobacco Product Manufacture Characteristics 116 4.4.1 Non-cigar Tobacco Production Characteristics in the United States 119 4.4.2 State Level Manufacturing Characteristics 121 4.5 Trade and Consumption .125 4.6 Conclusion 133 Federal and State Intervention in Agriculture 135 5.1 Federal Agricultural Policy in the Twentieth Century .140 viii 5.1.1 Constant Crises in Demand: 1920-1954 .142 5.1.2 Limited Market Forces and Cyclical Crises: 1954-1996 146 5.1.3 Income Support and Free Markets: the 1996 FAIR Act .150 5.2 Federal Policy for the Tobacco Industry 152 5.2.1 Tobacco Program Formation and Domestic Instability 152 5.2.2 Tobacco in a Global Context 157 5.2.3 Summary .161 5.3 Federal and State Policy in the Pork Industry 164 5.3.1 Policing Intra Industry Relations: Coordination, Integration, and Consolidation as Challenges to Farming Activities 166 5.3.2 Policing Industry-Society Relations: Environmental Law and Right to Farm Legislation .172 5.3.3 State-level Labor Context .176 5.3.4 Summary .177 The Relative Contributions of the Global Commodity Chains and Markets as Politics Explanations to Spatial Shifts in Agriculture 179 6.1 Variable Specification, Measurement, and Alternatives 180 6.1.1 Spatial Shifts in Agricultural Production 181 6.1.2 Control and Economic Variables 182 6.1.3 The Global Commodity Chains Perspective 184 6.1.4 The Markets as Politics Perspective .188 6.2 Model Specification 189 6.3 Pork Industry .192 6.3.1 Economic and Control Variable Models .192 6.3.2 Global Value Chains and Control Models 199 ix 6.3.3 Markets as Politics and Control Models .207 6.3.4 Compilation and Comparison .217 6.4 The Tobacco Industry 224 6.4.1 Economic and Control Variable Models .225 6.4.2 Global Value Chains and Control Models 226 6.4.3 Markets as Politics and Control Models .237 6.4.4 Compilation and Comparison .244 6.5 Discussion and Conclusion 253 6.5.1 Production Models 255 6.5.2 Structure Models .256 6.5.3 Comparison across Industries 261 Discussion and Conclusion 266 7.1 Summary of Research Findings 271 7.2 Study Contributions, Limitations, and Future Directions 281 A.1 Defining Farms, Acreages, Land Types, and Size Groups 287 A.1.1 Defining the Farm 288 A.1.2 Acreages .288 A.1.3 Farm Size Groups 290 A.1.4 Land Use Estimation 291 A.2 Industry Definitions and Compilation 292 A.3 Product Trade Definitions, Schema, and Conversion .295 B.1 Dependent Variable Diagnostics .300 B.1.1 Linear Transformation Options for the Dependent Variable 300 B.1.2 Correlation Measures of Dependent Variable Alternatives 305 x Park, Dooho, Andrew Seidl, Stephen Davies, and W Marshall Frasier 2000 “Environmental Policy Influences on Livestock Stocking and Location Decisions.” Paper presented at the Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, available at the RePEc project web site, University of Connecticut, last accessed February 15, 2010: http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/waeava/36340.html Peck, Alison 2006 “State Regulation of Production Contracts.” Research article, The National Agricultural Law Center Available online, February 20, 2010: http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/articles/peck_contractregulation.pdf Pelizzon, Sheila 1994 “The Grain Flour Chain, 1590-1790.” Pp 34-47 in Gereffi, Gary and Miguel Korzeniewicz, eds 1994 Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism Westport, CN: Praeger Perry, Janet, James MacDonald, Ken Nelson, William Hahn, Carlos Arnade, and Gerald Plato 2005, “Did the Mandatory Requirement Aid the Market?: Impact of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Electronic Outlook Report No LDP-M-135-01 Pfeffer, Max J 1983 “Social Origins of Three Systems of Farm Production in the United states.” Rural Sociology 48 (Winter): 540-562 Piccot, Stephen and Mark Saeger 1991 “Project Summary: National- and State-level Emissions Estimates of Radiatively Important Trace Gases (RITGs) from Anthropogenic Sources.” Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency Pittman, Harrison M 2004 “The Constitutionality of Corporate Farming Law in the Eighth Circuit.” Research article, National Agricultural Law Center Available online, last accessed February 20, 2010: http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/articles/pittman_corporatefarming.pdf Pittman, Harrison M 2005 “Market Concentration, Horizontal Consolidation, and Vertical Integration in the Hog and Cattle Industries: Taking Stock of the Road Ahead.” Research article, National Agricultural Law Center Available online, last accessed February 20, 2010: http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/ articles/pittman_marketconcentration.pdf Plümper, Thomas, Vera E Troeger, and Philip Manow 2005 “Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (March): 327-354 Porter, Jane M and Douglas E Bowers 1989 “A Short History of U.S Agricultural Trade Negotiations.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Staff report no AGES8923 392 Porter, Patrick G 1969 “Origins of the American Tobacco Company.” The Business History Review 43 (Spring): 59-76 Price Waterhouse 1990 The Economic Impact of the Tobacco Industry on the United States Economy Price Waterhouse econometric report Pugh, Charles 1981 “Landmarks in the Tobacco Program.” Pp 31-36 in The Tobacco Industry in Transition: Policies for the 1980s, edited by William R Finger Lexington, MA: Lexington Books Putnam, Judy 2000 “Major Trends in U.S Food Supply, 1909-1999.” Food Review January-April: 8-15 Raferty, Adrian E 1995 “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.” Sociological Methodology 25: 111-163 Raikes, Philip, Michael Friis Jensen, and Stefano Ponte 2000 “Global Commodity Chains Analysis and the Filière Approach: Comparison and Critique.” Economy and Society 29 (August): 390-417 Rasmussen, Wayne D 1985 “Historical Overview of U.S Agricultural Policies and Programs.” Pp 3-8 in Manchester, Alden, James Langley, and Barbara Stucker Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Commodity Program Perspectives United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No AER 530 Raup, Philip M 1973 “Corporate Farming in the United States.” The Journal of Economic History 33 (March): 274-290 Raynolds, Laura T 2002 “Consumer/Producer Links in Fair Trade Coffee Networks.” Sociologia Ruralis 42 (October): 404-424 Rhodes, V James 1995 “The Industrialization of Hog Production.” Review of Agricultural Economics 17 (May): 107-118 Ribaudo, Mark 2003 “Managing Manure: New Clean Water Act Regulations Create Imperative for Livestock Producers.” Amber Waves AER-818 (February): 31-37 Ridley, Scott 1987 The State of the States, 1987 Washington, D.C.: Fund for Renewable Energy and the Environment Roe, Brian, Elena G Irwin, and Jeff S Sharp 2002 “Pigs in Space: Modeling the Spatial Structure of Hog Production in Traditional and Nontraditional Production Regions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (May): pp 259-278 393 Rothstein, Jeffrey S 2005 “Economic Development Policymaking Down the Global Commodity Chain: Attracting an Auto Indsutry to Silao, Mexico.” Social Forces 84 (September): 49-69 RTI International 2007a GIPSA Livestock and Meat Marketing Study: Volume 3: Fed Cattle and Beef Industries Report prepared for the Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyard Administration, United States Department of Agriculture RTI International 2007b GIPSA Livestock and Meat Marketing Study: Volume 4: Hog and Pork Industries Report prepared for the Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyard Administration, United States Department of Agriculture Schaffer, Mark 2006 “st: RE: Want to run xtreg with AR(1) autocorrelation allowed.” Electronic message posted to the Stata Listserver, last accessed December 15, 2009: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-05/msg00076.html Schroeter, John R Azzeddine M Azzam, and J David Aiken 2006 “Anti-Corporate Farming Laws and Industry Structure: The Case of Cattle Feeding.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88 (November): 1000-1014 Shafey, O., V Cokkinides, T.M Cavalcante, M Teixeira, C Vianna, and M Thun 2002 “Case Studies in International Tobacco Surveillance: Cigarette Smuggling in Brazil.” Tobacco Control 11 (September): 215-219 Sheingate, Adam D 2001 The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State: Institutions and Interest Group Power in the United States, France, and Japan Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press Shideler, James H 1957 Farm Crisis 1919-1923 Berkeley CA: University of California Press Short, Sara D 1982 “Concentration of 1978 Deficiency Payments.” North Carolina Journal of Agricultural Economics (July): 21-29 Shugars, Owen K and Earle E Gavett 1972 “Changing Technology in Tobacco Production.” Pp 167-179 in Bordeaux, A Frank, Jr and Russell H Brannon (eds.) Social and Economic Issues Confronting the Tobacco Industry in the Seventies Lexington, KY: College of Agriculture and Center for Developmental Change, University of Kentucky Skaggs, Jimmy M 1986 Prime Cut: Livestock Raising and Meatpacking in the United States, 1607-1983 College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press Skully, David 2000 “U.S TRQs for Peanuts, Sugar, and Tobacco: Historical Allocation and Nondiscrimination.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29 (April): 81-90 394 Slade, John 1992 “The Tobacco Epidemic: Lessons from History.” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 24 (Summer): 99-109 Snell, William M and Orlando D Chambers 1997 “Buying and Selling Burley Quota: What Factors Should Farmers Consider?” University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service pamphlet No AEC-76 Sobek, Matthew 2001 “New Statistics on the U.S Labor Force, 1850-1990.” Historical Methods 34 (March):71-87 Spears, A.W and S T Jones 1983 (estimated) “Chemical and Physical Criteria for Tobacco Leaf of Modern Day Cigarettes.” Lorillard research report, available at the Tobacco Documents Online web site, last accessed January 20, 2010: http://tobaccodocuments.org/lor/81051663-1683.html Stata Corporation 2007 Longitudinal/Panel Data College Station, TX: Stata Press Stayton, Brian F 1991 “A Legislative Experiment in Rural Culture: The Anti-Corporate Farming Statutes.” UMKC Law Review59 (Spring): 679-693 Stryker, Robin 1990 “Beyond History Versus Theory: Strategic narrative and Sociological Explanation.” Sociological Methods 24 (February): 304-352 Sullivan, John, Utpal Vasavada, and Mark Smith 2000 “Environmental Regulation and Location of Hog Production.” Agricultural Outlook September: 19-23 Sullivan, Patrick, Daniel Hellerstein, Leroy Hansen, Robert Johansson, Steven Koenig, Ruben Lubowski, William McBride, David McGranahan, Michael Roberts, Stephen Vogel, and Shawn Bucholtz 2004 “The Conservation Reserve Program: Economic Implications for Rural America.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No AER834 Sumner, Paul and J Michael Moore 1993 “Harvesting and Curing Flue-Cured Tobacco.” University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service pamphlet Available online, last accessed January 10, 2010: http://www.cpes.peachnet.edu/tobacco/pubs/Harvesting%20and%20Curing %20Flue-Cured%20Tobacco.pdf Teigen, Lloyd D 1987 “Agricultural Parity: Historical Review and Alternative Calculations.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No 571 Tukey, John W 1977 Exploratory Data Analysis Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley 395 United States Bureau of the Census 2009a Schedule B 2009 Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office Available online, last accessed November 15, 2009: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/schedules/b/2009/index.html United States Bureau of the Census 2009b State and Local Government Finance Online database, last accessed December 5, 2009: http://www.census.gov/govs/estimate/ United States Bureau of the Census Various years (a) Annual Survey of Manufactures Washington D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Bureau of the Census Various years (b) Census of Manufactures Washington D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Bureau of the Census Various years (c) Numerical List of Manufactured Products Washington D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Bureau of the Census Various years (d) Schedule B Classification of Domestic and Foreign Commodities Exported from the United States Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office United States Bureau of the Census Various years (e) United States Exports of Domestic and Foreign Merchandise Commodity by Country of Destination Report FT-410 Washington, D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Bureau of the Census Various years (f) U.S General Imports: Schedule A Commodity by Country Report FT-135 Washington, D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Bureau of the Census Various years (g) United States Imports of Merchandise for Consumption, Commodity by Country of Origin Report FT-110 Washington, D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Bureau of the Census Various years (h) U.S Imports for Consumption and General Imports: TSUSA Commodity by Country of Origin Report FT-246 Washington, D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Department of Agriculture 2003 Agriculture Fact Book 2001-2002 Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office United States Department of Agriculture Various years (a) Agricultural Statistics Washington D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Department of Agriculture Various years (b) Census of Agriculture Washington D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service 1974 “FlueCured Tobacco Market Review.” Report No TOB-FL-17 396 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 1991 “Farm Employment and Wage Rates.” Computer file, #91005Z Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Available online, last updated June 1993, last accessed November 15, 2009: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/archive/91005 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 1996 Tobacco Statistics (94012) Online dataset archive, last accessed January 10, 2010: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do? documentID=1391 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 1999 “Agricultural Land Values: Final Estimates 1994-1998.” Statistical Bulletin No 957 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2000 Tobacco Situation and Outlook Yearbook Report No TBS-248 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2004 “Agricultural Land Values and Cash Rents: Final Estimates 1999-2003.” Statistical Bulletin No 993 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2006 Red Meat Yearbook Online dataset, last accessed October 31, 2009: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do? documentID=1354 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2009a “Agricultural Land Values and Cash Rents: Final Estimates 2004-2008.” bStatistical Bulletin No 1017 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2009b “Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS): Resource Regions.” Online web page, last accessed January 1, 2010: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/ARMS/resourceregions/resourceregions.htm United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2009c Commodity Costs and Returns Online database, last accessed January 1, 2010: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/ United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2009d “Farm Income: Data Files Number of Farms, Land in Farms, and Value of Farm Real Estate, 1850-2009.” Online database, last updated August 6, 2009, last accessed November 2009: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FarmIncome/finfidmuxls#farmnos 397 United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2009e Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System Online database, last accessed October 31, 2009: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodConsumption/ United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 2009f Meat Price Spreads Online database, last accessed October 31, 2009: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/MeatPriceSpreads/ United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service 2000 “Argentina Tobacco and Products, Annual 2000.” Global Agriculture Information Network Report No AR0032 Available online, last accessed January 20, 2010: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200005/25667583.pdf United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service 2009 U.S Trade Internet System [electronic database] United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service Retrieved March 1, 2009: http://www.fas.usda.gov/ustrade/ United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service 2010 Production, Supply and Distribution Online Online database, last accessed January 20, 2010: http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdHome.aspx United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service Various years “Tobacco: World Markets and Trade.” Circular series United States Department of Agriculture, Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration 1996 “Concentration in the Red Meat Packing Industry.” United States Department of Agriculture, Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration 2008 “Packers and Stockyards Statistical Report: 2006 Reporting Year.” Report No SR-08-1 United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service Various years (a) “Agricultural Prices: Annual Summary.” Report No Pr 1-3 United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service Various years (b) Agricultural Statistics Washington, D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service Various years (c) “Crop Production.” Washington D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture Report No CrPr 2-1 United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service Various years (d) “Crop Values.” Washington D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture Report No CrPr 2-1 398 United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service Various years (e) “Livestock Slaughter.” Washington D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture Report No Mt An 1-2-1 United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service Various years (f) “Meat Animals Production, Disposition, and Income by States.” Washington D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture Report No An 1-1 Untied States Department of Agriculture, Rural Business and Cooperative Development Service 1985 “Understanding Capper-Volstead.” Cooperative Information Report No 35 (June) United States Department of Commerce 1989 1987 Census of Manufactures and Census of Mineral Industries: Numerical List of Manufactured and Mineral Products Washington D.C: Government Printing Office United States Department of Commerce 1999 1997 Economic Census, Manufacturing and Mining: Numerical List of Manufactured and Mineral Products Washington D.C: Government Printing Office United States Department of Commerce Various years Statistical Abstract of the United States Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office United States International Trade Commission 1987 Tariff Schedules of the United States Annotated USITC Publication #1910 Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office United States International Trade Commission 1988 Continuity of Import and Export Trade Statistics After Implementation of the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System: Report to the President on Investigation No 332-250 Under Section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930 USITC Publication 2051, January United States International Trade Commission 2005 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States USITC Publication #3745 Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office University of Vermont and the American Association for Horsemanship Safety 2003 “Agricultural Protection Laws.” Online compilation of right to farm laws Available at the University of Vermont, Equine Service Program web site, last accessed February 20, 2010: http://asci.uvm.edu/equine/law/nuisance/nuisance.htm UPI 1965 “Acreage-Poundage Program for Tobacco Gets Backing.” The Times-News, January 26, p 12 van Liemt, Gijsbert 2002 “The World Tobacco Industry: Trends and Prospects.” International Labour Office, Sectoral Activities Programme working paper, 399 available online, last accessed January 20, 2010: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/sector/papers/tobacco/wp179.pdf Warren, Drake 2006 “Industrialization of U.S Agriculture: The New Geography of Animal Production and Slaughter.” Report to USDA Rural Development Avaialbe online, last accessed November 15, 2009: http://www.ace.illinois.edu/Reap/WarrenIsserman_060814_Livestock2.pdf Washington Post 2007 “Harvesting Cash: A Yearlong Investigation by the Washington Post.” Online web pages, last accessed June 15, 2010: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/interactives/farmaid/ Weiss, Thomas 1992 “U.S Labor Force Estimates and Economic Growth.” Pp 19-78 in Gallman, Robert E and John Joseph Wallis (eds.) American Economic Growth and Standards of Living before the Civil War Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press Welsh, Rick, Chantal Line Carpentier, and Bryan Hubbell 2001 “On the Effectiveness of State Anti-Corporate Farming Laws in the United States Food Policy 26 (October): 543-548 Westcott, Paul C and C Edwin Young 2004 “Farm Program Effects on Agricultural Production: Coupled and Decoupled Programs.” Pp.7-18 in Burfisher, Mary E and Jeffrey Hopkins (eds.) Decoupled Payments in a Changing Policy Setting United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No 838 Westcott, Paul C., C Edward Young, and J Michael Price 2002 “The 2002 Farm Act: Provisions and Implications for Commodity Markets.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agriculture Information Bulletin No AIB778 White, Harrison 1981 “Where Do Markets Come From?” American Journal of Sociology 87 (November): 517-547 Wiebe, Keith and Noel Gollehon 2006 “Agricultural Resource and Environmental Indicators, 2006 Edition.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Electronic Information Bulletin No 16 Wilkinson, John 1997 “A New Paradigm for Economic Analysis?” Economy and Society 26 (August): 305-339 Williamson, Oliver E 1985 The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, markets, Relational Contracting New York, NY: Free Press Womach, Jasper 2003 “U.S Tobacco Production, Consumption, and Export Trends.” Congressional Research Service report no RL30947 400 Womack, Rocky 2005 “What Led to the Tobacco Quota Buyout?” Southeast Farm Press, April 13 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M 2002 Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Cambridge MA: MIT Press Wooldridge, Jeffrey M 2009 Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 4th edition Mason, OH: South Western Young, C Edwin and Dennis A Shields 1996 “1996 FAIR Act Frames Farm Policy for Years.” Agricultural Outlook supplement (April): 1-23 Young, C Edwin and Paul C Westcott 1996 “The 1996 Farm Act Increases Market Orientation.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agriculture Information Bulletin No AIB726 Zucker, Lynne G 1987 “Institutional Theories of Organization.” Annual Review of Sociology 13: 443-464 401 Biography Ryan Denniston was born in Omaha, Nebraska on August 7, 1979 Ryan received the Bachelor of Arts in political science in 2001, the Masters of Arts in Sociology in 2004, and the Doctorate of Philosophy in Sociology in 2010, all from Duke University Ryan has two published papers, “Economic Globalization, Industrialization, and Deindustrialization in Affluent Democracies” with David Brady, and “North Carolina in the Global Economy: A Value Chain Perspective on the State’s Leading Industries” with Gary Gereffi and Mike Hensen Ryan received the Markets and Management fellowship during his second year and the Department of Sociology teaching award in 2008 402 ...ABSTRACT Causes and Impacts of Institutional and Structural Variation: Globalization in the Tobacco and Pork Industries by Ryan Denniston Department of Sociology Duke University... between globalization and the structure and location of agriculture requires the incorporation of other actors that directly impact the operation of the industry The definition of the industry... of localities, and exogenous shocks interact The timing of these developments is crucial to the establishment of causality The relative importance of intra- and extra-industry actors, intra-industry

Ngày đăng: 18/10/2022, 17:26

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w