1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo Dục - Đào Tạo

Australian administrative law Fundamentals, principles and doctrines docx

524 5.9K 1

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Cấu trúc

  • Cover

  • Half-title

  • Title

  • Copyright

  • Contents

  • Foreword

  • Preface

  • About the contributors

  • Table of cases

  • Table of statutes

  • 1 Australian administrative law: The constitutional and legal matrix

    • A starting proposition: All power has its limits

    • The Constitutional backdrop

      • The role of responsible government

      • The absence of a Bill of Rights

      • The separation of powers

      • The limits on the judicial role imposed by the separation of powers doctrine

      • The constitutionally entrenched position of the High Court

        • The New Administrative Law

  • 2 Administrative law in Australia: Themes and values

    • Underlying simplicities

    • Administrative law and the rule of law

    • The constitutional framework

    • The vessels of administrative law – administrative and judicial review

    • Themes and values – A taxonomical choice

    • Statutory interpretation – Where themes and values are embedded

    • Good faith

    • Rationality

    • Fairness

  • 3 The public/private distinction in Australian administrative law

    • English efforts

    • Australian attempts

      • Typing Centre of New South Wales v Toose and Others

      • The State of Victoria v the Master Builders’ Association of Victoria

      • NEAT Domestic Trading Pty Ltd v AWB Limited and Masu Financial Management P/L v FICS and Julie Wong

      • D’Souza v The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists

    • A theory of the state in Australian law

  • 4 Australian administrative law: The human rights dimension

    • Convergence and divergence of human rights and administrative law

    • The concept of proportionality

    • The public/private distinction

    • A right to administrative justice?

    • Interpretive principles and human rights

      • Non-interference with fundamental rights

      • Interpretation of ambiguous statutes

      • Developing the common law

      • Legitimate expectations

      • Customary international law

      • ‘Beneficial construction’

    • Legislative scrutiny of Bills

    • Role of the Commonwealth Ombudsman

  • 5 Administrative tribunals

    • What is a tribunal?

    • Categories of administrative tribunals

      • Specialist tribunals

      • Generalist and multi-purpose tribunals

      • Single/two tier tribunals

      • Public/private dispute tribunals

      • Primary decision maker/review body

    • Tribunals in the system of government

    • Tribunals in Australian jurisdictions

    • Merit review and tribunals

      • Merit review is generally de novo

      • Merit review is of the decision, not the reasons for the decision

    • The jurisdiction of tribunals

      • Does ‘decision’ encompass procedural as well as substantive determinations?

      • Scope of de novo review jurisdiction

    • Tribunal, procedure and evidence

      • Evidence

      • Evidence must be probative

      • Tribunal review is often investigative rather than adversarial

      • Must be ‘fair, just, economical, informal and quick’

      • Burden and standards of proof

    • Appealing tribunal decisions

    • Tribunals and policy

    • Impact of tribunal decisions

  • 6 Australian Ombudsman: A continual work in progress

    • Revisiting the dawn of the Australian Ombudsman

    • 1976–1989: Setting the pattern and finding some creative responses

    • 1990–2002: The Commonwealth Ombudsman reacting and responding to an administrative landscape in flux

    • 2003 and beyond: More changes, new theories and a bigger footprint

    • State Ombudsmen – cut from a different cloth?

  • 7 Freedom of information

    • The Commonwealth Act

    • Objectives and interpretation

    • Scope

    • Publication requirements

    • Applications for access to documents

      • Informal access

      • Applying for access

      • Requirements for making applications

      • Obligations concerning processing of applications

      • Fees and charges

      • Obligations to consult with third parties

      • Possible responses to requests

      • Protection against liability arising from disclosure of documents

      • Grounds for denying access to a document

    • The exemption provisions

      • General matters of interpretation

      • The exemption provisions

        • National security and international relations

        • Relations with states and territories

        • Internal working documents

        • Law enforcement and protection of public safety

        • Documents subject to secrecy provisions in other laws

        • Documents affecting the Commonwealth’s financial or property interests

        • Documents concerning certain agency operations

        • Documents affecting personal privacy

        • Documents subject to legal professional privilege

        • Documents relating to business affairs

        • Other exemptions

    • Applications for amendment of personal documents

      • Making an application

      • Responding to an application

      • Review of adverse decisions

      • Internal review

      • Ombudsman review

      • Tribunal review

        • General

        • Documents subject to conclusive certificates

      • Judicial review

    • Overview

    • State and territory legislation

  • 8 Delegated legislation

    • The justification for having delegated legislation

    • Arguments against the use of delegated legislation

    • Delegated legislation and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (Cth)

    • The importance of disallowance

    • The significance of s5 of the Legislative Instruments Act

    • Delegated legislation and the courts

    • The role of parliamentary committees

  • 9 The concept of ‘justiciability’ in administrative law

    • The core meaning of ‘non-justiciability’

      • Underlying issues

    • Non-justiciability: A short history

      • Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for Civil Service (CCSU)

    • The current Australian law

    • Subject matter immunities

    • Non-justiciability, political questions and the separation of powers

    • Criticisms of the justiciability doctrine

  • 10 Standing

    • The standing of the Attorneys-General

    • Injunctions, declarations and (probably) mandamus and orders under the Judicial Review Acts

      • High Court authority

      • Applying the rules

      • Orthodox decisions

      • Organisations’ interests

      • Sufficient interests

        • Is the interest consistent with fundamental legal policy?

      • Precedent

    • Standing to seek public law writs

    • Legislation

  • 11 Reasons for administrative decisions: Legal framework and reform

    • The role of reasons

      • The private benefits

      • The public benefits

    • Disadvantages of furnishing reasons for decisions

    • Right to reasons and duty to give reasons under statute

      • The administrative law statutes

      • Subject-specific legislation

      • Decisions outside the statutes

    • The common law attitude to giving reasons

    • Post-Osmond’s case

    • Effect of not giving reasons

    • Developments in the United Kingdom

    • Modern approach: A framework for giving reasons

      • Guiding principles

      • Proposed framework

  • 12 Relevant and irrelevant considerations

    • Failure to take into account relevant considerations

    • Taking into account irrelevant considerations

  • 13 Improper purpose

    • The Toohey case

    • Determining the purpose of the power

    • Evidentiary burden

    • A mixture of purposes

    • Decisions made by a multi-member body

    • Improper purpose and bad faith

      • An overlap with irrelevant considerations

  • 14 Reasonableness, rationality and proportionality

    • Why is reasonableness legally required?

    • Reasonable, rational, proportionate

    • Is the test objective or subjective?

    • Reasonable fact-finding

      • The finding must be empirically grounded in rationally probative evidence

      • The finding must have been reasonably open on the evidence

      • The decision maker must have rationally considered the evidence

      • The rule of restraint

      • Managing uncertainty

    • Reasonable exercises of discretion

      • Inconsistency and unequal treatment

      • Disproportionate impact

      • Proportionality, human rights and degrees of scrutiny

      • Reasonable Delegated Legislation

  • 15 The ‘no evidence’ rule

    • ‘No evidence’, law versus facts and the ‘legality-merits’ distinction

    • ‘No evidence’ as a basis for judicial review

      • Fact finding generally and errors of law

      • ‘No evidence’, jurisdictional error and error of law on the face of the record

      • Developments under English law

      • The Australian common law position

      • ‘No evidence’ and other grounds of review

    • Statutory regimes of judicial review and ‘no evidence’ rule – the ‘ADJR Act system’

      • The specific ‘no evidence’ ground in s5(1)(h)

      • The general ‘error of law’ ground in s5(1)(f)

      • The relationship between ‘error of law’ in s5(1)(f) and ‘no evidence’ in s5(1)(h)

      • Section 5(3)(a) – the first ‘no evidence’ limb

      • Section 5(3)(b) – the second ‘no evidence’ limb

      • The relationship between s5(1)(h) and s5(3)

      • The ADJR Act: Where to now for the relationship between s5(1)(h) and s5(3)?

  • 16 Failure to exercise discretion or perform duties

    • The meaning of discretion

    • The political context

    • Applicable grounds of judicial review

      • Acting under dictation

      • Inflexible application of policy

      • Fettering of discretion by undertakings

      • Improper delegation

    • Delegation

    • Agency/alter ego principle

      • Failure to perform a duty

      • An appraisal

  • 17 Procedural fairness: The hearing rule

    • Application of the hearing rule

    • Exclusion or limitation of a duty to accord procedural fairness

      • Exclusion by implication

    • Requirements of the hearing rule

    • Effect of breach

  • 18 The doctrine of substantive unfairness and the review of substantive legitimate expectations

    • Introduction

    • Separation of powers, procedural unfairness and substantive unfairness

    • Substantive unfairness in the United Kingdom before Coughlan

    • Coughlan and the formulation of substantive unfairness

      • The use of the doctrine post-Coughlan

        • (i) Decisions to close, or not provide, hospital and support services

        • (ii) Decisions to cease funding of assisted education places

        • (iii) Prisoners’ conditions and parole

        • (iv) The making of ex gratia payments

        • (v) Environmental law and planning decisions

        • (vi) Immigration decisions

        • (vii) Summary on the UK position

    • The doctrine of substantive legitimate expectations in Australia

    • Conclusion: should the UK or Australian position on substantive unfairness be preferred?

  • 19 The impact and significance of Teoh and Lam

    • The facts and context of Teoh and Lam

    • The interaction between international law and Australian administrative law

      • The decision in Teoh

      • The response to Teoh

      • The future impact of international treaties in Australian administrative law

    • Implications for procedural fairness and the role of legitimate expectations

      • The concept of legitimate expectations

        • Subjective versus objective expectations

        • Substantive versus procedural outcomes

      • The meaning of unfairness

      • Unfairness and ‘practical injustice’ post-Lam

  • 20 The rule against bias

    • Actual and apprehended bias

      • What values underpin the rule against bias?

      • The demise of the rule of automatic disqualification – the rise of a context sensitive rule against bias

      • Real likelihood, real danger or reasonable likelihood of bias?

      • What behaviour might give rise to a complaint of bias?

      • Exceptions to the rule against bias

        • Waiver

        • Statutory abrogation or modification

        • Necessity

  • 21 Jurisdictional error without the tears

    • Different contexts, different meanings?

    • The High Court’s special position

    • The modern catalogue of jurisdictional errors

    • Death of the pure theory of jurisdiction

    • Jurisdictional errors: Can values be rules?

    • Going beyond jurisdictional error

  • 22 Privative clauses and the limits of the law

    • Judicial review and privative clauses

    • An overview of the issue

      • Identifying privative clauses

      • The privative clause and kryptonite: Jurisdictional error

    • Towards a general interpretative approach to privative clauses

    • Privative clauses and the importance of context

      • Privative clauses in industrial relations

      • Privative clauses in immigration and refugee law

    • The future of privative clauses?

  • 23 Administrative law judicial remedies

    • The historical legacy

    • Statutory reform in the United Kingdom

    • Statutory reform in Australia

    • Refocus on the Constitution

  • Notes

    • Foreword

    • Chapter 1

    • Chapter 2

    • Chapter 3

    • Chapter 4

    • Chapter 5

    • Chapter 6

    • Chapter 7

    • Chapter 8

    • Chapter 9

    • Chapter 10

    • Chapter 11

    • Chapter 12

    • Chapter 13

    • Chapter 14

    • Chapter 15

    • Chapter 16

    • Chapter 17

    • Chapter 18

    • Chapter 19

    • Chapter 20

    • Chapter 21

    • Chapter 22

  • Index

Nội dung

This page intentionally left blank Australian administrative law The growth of administrative law in Australia has continued in an unabated form since the introduction of innovative reforms in the mid-1970s. The centre plank of these reforms was the establishment of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal with follow-on reforms relating to the Ombudsman, judicial review and freedom of information legislation. The impact of these reforms has been vast and sig- nificant. Australian Administrative Law: Fundamentals, Principles and Doctrines seeks to take stock of the growth and development of administrative law princi- ples. Particular attention is paid to the important cases and key doctrines which provide the theoretical underpinnings of these principles. In this book, a team of highly respected administrative law scholars and jurists aim toprovidea lucidexpositionofthe relevantcase law,principlesand doctrines. The book illuminates the fundamental features of Australian administrative law and will prove useful to students and practitioners interested in this field. Matthew Groves is Senior Lecturer in Law at Monash University. H P Lee holds the Sir John Latham Chair of Law at Monash University. Australian administrative law Fundamentals, principles and doctrines Matthew Groves H P Lee CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK First published in print format ISBN-13 978-0-521-69790-3 ISBN-13 978-0-511-35445-8 © Matthew Groves, HP Lee 2007 2007 Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521697903 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written p ermission of Cambrid g e University Press. ISBN-10 0-511-35445-2 ISBN-10 0-521-69790-5 Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not g uarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or a pp ro p riate. Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org paperback eBook (EBL) eBook (EBL) paperback Contents Foreword vii Preface ix About the contributors xi Table of cases xvii Table of statutes xxxix 1 Australian administrative law: The constitutional and legal matrix 1 MATTHEW GROVES AND H P LEE 2 Administrative law in Australia: Themes and values 15 JUSTICE ROBERT FRENCH 3 The public/private distinction in Australian administrative law 34 COLIN CAMPBELL 4 Australian administrative law: The human rights dimension 50 BEN SAUL 5 Administrative tribunals 77 ROBYN CREYKE 6 Australian Ombudsman: A continual work in progress 100 RICK SNELL 7 Freedom of information 116 MOIRA PATERSON 8 Delegated legislation 134 STEPHEN ARGUMENT 9 The concept of ‘justiciability’ in administrative law 143 CHRIS FINN 10 Standing 158 ROGER DOUGLAS 11 Reasons for administrative decisions: Legal framework and reform 172 MARILYN PITTARD v vi CONTENTS 12 Relevant and irrelevant considerations 185 NAOMI SIDEBOTHAM 13 Improper purpose 198 HP LEE 14 Reasonableness, rationality and proportionality 212 GEOFF AIRO- FARULL A 15 The ‘no evidence’ rule 233 BILL LANE 16 Failure to exercise discretion or perform duties 253 MARIA O’ SULLIVAN 17 Procedural fairness: The hearing rule 265 LINDA PEARSON 18 The doctrine of substantive unfairness and the review of substantive legitimate expectations 280 CAMERON STEWART 19 The impact and significance of Teoh and Lam 299 ALISON DUXBURY 20 The rule against bias 316 MATTHEW GROVES 21 Jurisdictional error without the tears 330 MARK ARONSON 22 Privative clauses and the limits of the law 345 MARY CROCK AND EDWARD SANTOW 23 Administrative law judicial remedies 368 STEPHEN GAGELER Endnotes 381 Index 465 Foreword TheHonMEJBlack AC Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia The large, complex and evolving field of administrative law is of special impor- tance to lawyers and indeed to all concerned with Australia’s democracy. This is not only because administrative decision-making can, and increasingly does, touch upon almost any aspect of our lives but, more fundamentally, because administrative law is one of the primary means by which our commitment to the rule of law is applied. This commitment to the rule of law may be seen at its most direct in the field of judicial review. As a former Chief Justice of Australia has written: Judicial review is neithermorenor lessthan theenforcementof therule of lawover executive action; itis themeans by which executive action is prevented from exceeding thepowers and functions assigned to the executive by law and the interests of the individual are protected accordingly. 1 Australian administrative law has its own distinctive character. Its influences include the Commonwealth’s legislative reforms of the 1970s and early 1980s. These reforms covereda widefield, andincluded the establishmentof asimplified process of judicial review before the newly created Federal Court of Australia. No less importantly, the reforms provided for merits review before a new and independent tribunal of high standing, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. It would be a serious mistake to underestimate the importance of merits review by tribunals and other non-judicial aspects of administrative law, for tribunals are usually the first and most accessible avenue for Australians seeking review of executive decision-making. The reforms also created the office of the Common- wealth Ombudsman, and the Administrative Review Council to keep the new system under review and the reforms maintained. All this occurred against the rich background of the common law and its institutions and in the constant pres- ence of Australia’s Constitution – often unnoticed but, on occasion, stamping its own authority on the development of this body of law. In this excellent new book, distinguished scholars from academia, the prac- tising legal profession, and the judiciary explore and explain Australian admin- istrative law, its theories, the ideas and the principles upon which it rests. The intended readership includes tertiary students and to them I would com- mend the quality of the scholarship and the enthusiasm for the subject that the writing conveys; as lawyers they will have an important role to play in promoting an understanding of the fundamentals of our system of government. vii viii FOREWORD Administrative law, and its interaction with constitutional law, should be one of their special responsibilities. Also, although students will no doubt concentrate on particular chapters, I would urge them to read and consider the work as a whole, for administrative law is an area in which a clear understanding of the broad field – which the book provides in full measure – is needed for a proper understanding of the individual parts. I am delighted to have the opportunity of writing the foreword to this very valuable contemporary work on administrative law in Australia. M E J Black Owen Dixon Commonwealth Law Courts Melbourne 19 February 2007 [...]... international law, human rights law, and the intersection between international law and public law Chris Finn is Senior Lecturer in Law at the Law School of the University of Adelaide He teaches and researches in the areas of administrative law and competition law and has published in relation to Freedom of Information legislation, government contracting, privatisation and utility regulation (including the Australian. .. Professor and formerly Associate Dean (Postgraduate Studies) at the Faculty of Law at Monash University Her teaching fields include undergraduate and postgraduate labour and employment law, administrative law and public sector employment law Marilyn has published widely in labour and employment law, co-authoring Australian Labour Law: Cases and Materials (4th edn, 2003) (and several previous editions) and. .. CONTRIBUTORS xv and law and literature and has published in relation to the rule of law, jurisdictional error and unreasonableness Rick Snell is Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Tasmania, where he teaches and researches in administrative law and comparative administrative law In particular, his comparative research focuses on freedom of information and Ombudsman He is a member of the Tasmanian Administrative. .. University of Queensland He is joint author of Lane and Young: Administrative Law in Queensland (2001); joint editor of Lane and Young Queensland Administrative Law and the editor of the Queensland Administrative Reports He is also a part-time Senior Member of the Veterans Review Board (Cth) and Member of the Non State Schools Accreditation Board (Qld) HP Lee is the Sir John Latham Professor of Law at Monash... Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne and a member of the Asia-Pacific Centre for Military Law She holds bachelor degrees in Arts and Laws (Hons) from the University of Melbourne, and a Master of Law from Cambridge University She has taught a variety of subjects, including constitutional and administrative law, international law, and military administrative law Her main research interests... Development, Law and Operation (1995) She is founding Editorial Board member, Australian Journal of Labour Law; editor, Employment Law Bulletin; faculty adviser, Monash University Law Review; executive committee member and Victorian chapter convenor, Australian Labour Law Association Edward Santow is a legal officer at the Australian Law Reform Commission and a part-time lecturer in Administrative Law at... teaches public law, legal ethics and succession law Matthew is co-author of Aronson, Dyer and Groves’, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (3rd edn, 2004) and has published widely on administrative law, prison management and military law Bill Lane is the Clayton Utz Professor of Public Law at Queensland University of Technology, having previously taught law at La Trobe University, Melbourne and the University... of Law He teaches and researches in Australian constitutional law and comparative constitutional law His major works include HP Lee and G Winterton (eds), Australian Constitutional Landmarks (2003), E Campbell and HP Lee, The Australian Judiciary (2001), HP Lee, Constitutional Conflicts in Contemporary Malaysia (1995) and HP Lee, Emergency Powers (1984) He is also currently the Vice-Chairman of the Australian. .. at the Australian National University, where she teaches mainly administrative law and military law Her main research interests are in administrative law, notably the impact of judicial review cases and the position of tribunals in our system of government Robin’s publications include Veterans’ Entitlements Law (2001, with P Sutherland) and Laying Down the Law (6th edn, with several co-authors) and Control... where he teaches administrative law, civil procedure, equity and trusts His recent research examines the use of law to control political dissent Roger’s publications include numerous articles in law, sociology and criminology journals, and books including: Dealing with Demonstrations (2004), Douglas and Jones’ Administrative Law: Cases and Commentary (5th edn 2006), and Social Aspects of Law (1973) Alison . Lane and Young: Administrative Law in Queensland (2001); joint editor of Lane and Young Queensland Administrative Law and the editor of the Queensland Administrative. constitutional and administrative law, international law, and military administrative law. Her main research interests include international law, human rights law, and

Ngày đăng: 06/03/2014, 23:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN