Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 51 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
51
Dung lượng
272,51 KB
Nội dung
Payments forEnvironmentalServicesinVietnam:
Assessing anEconomicApproachtoSustainableForest
Management
Bui Dung The
Hong Bich Ngoc
August 2006
Comments should be sent to:
Bui Dung The Chair, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Economics,
College of Economics, Hue University, 100 Phung Hung, Hue City, Vietnam. Email:
buidungthe@dng.vnn.vn; buidungthe@yahoo.com
Hong Bich Ngoc, Lecturer, Faculty of Forestry, College of Agriculture and
Forestry, Hue University, 102 Phung Hung, Hue City, Vietnam. Email:
hongbichngoc@hotmail.com
EEPSEA was established in May 1993 to support research and training inenvironmental
and resource economics. Its objective is to enhance local capacity to undertake the
economic analysis of environmental problems and policies. It uses a networking approach,
involving courses, meetings, technical support, access to literature and opportunities for
comparative research. Member countries are Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, the
Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia, Lao PDR, China, Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka.
EEPSEA is supported by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC); the
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); and the Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA).
EEPSEA publications are also available online at http://www.eepsea.org.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank the following individuals and institutions that
assisted in the preparation of this study:
The Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), especially
Dr. David Glover, Dr. Herminia A. Francisco, Dr. Nancy Olewiler, Dr. Paul J. Ferraro and
Dr. Wiktor L. Adamowicz for their invaluable guidance, comments and suggestions during
all phases of the study.
Dr. Nguyen Van Phat, Rector of the College of Economics, Hue University for
administrative arrangements and the research team, especially Mr. Pham Xuan Hung and
Mr. Le Trong Thuc for their cooperation in undertaking research activities.
The staff of the Department of Agricultural and Rural Development, Thua Thien
Hue Province and the Agricultural Office of Nam Dong district for their institutional
arrangements and support in collecting much-needed data and information.
The people of the communes of Khe Tre, Huong Phu and Xuan Loc of the province
of Thua Thien Hue especially the farmers who joined the experiment for their support and
cooperation.
Other institutions and individuals who provided assistance in the implementation of
this study.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENT
ACRONYMS iv
ABSTRACT v
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 The Research Problem 1
1.2 Research Objectives and Research Questions 2
1.2.1 Research Objectives 2
1.2.2 Research Questions 2
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW 3
2.1 PaymentsforEnvironmentalServices 3
2.2 EnvironmentalServices 4
2.3 Challenges and Issues in the Design and Implementation of PES 5
2.4 World Wide PES Experience 7
3.0 PES CONTEXT IN VIETNAM 8
3.1 Forest Resources 8
3.2 Legal Framework 8
3.2.1 Ownership 9
3.2.2 Forest and Forest land Contracts and Allocation 10
3.2.3 Benefit Policy 10
4.0 THE EXPERIMENT 13
4.1 Proposed ForestManagement Practice and Stakeholders 13
4.2 Project Implementation and Monitoring 14
4.2.1 Institutional Arrangement 14
4.2.2 Eligible Farmers, the Control Group and WTA Prices 15
4.2.3 Contracts and Payments 16
4.2.4 Monitoring 16
4.2.5 Interviewing Relevant Governmental and Non-governmental
Officials 17
4.3 Selected Characteristics of the Households Involved 17
5.0 WTA PRICE AND DETERMINANTS OF ADOPTION 20
5.1 Distribution of the WTA Price 20
5.2 Factors Influencing Adoption 21
5.3 Analytical Procedure 22
5.4 Regression Estimation Results 23
6.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 26
6.1 Socio-economic Impact 26
6.2 Environmental Impact 27
7.0 TRANSACTION COST 30
7.1 Some Practical Considerations 30
7.2 Estimated Transaction Costs 30
8.0 CONSTRAINTS AND POTENTIAL FOR PES IN VIETNAM 32
8.1 Constraints 32
8.2 Potential 33
9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34
9.1 Conclusions 34
9.2 Recommendations 35
REFERENCES 37
ii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1: Characteristics of households involved (before any payments made) 18
Table 5.1: Definition of variables used in the binomial logit model 22
Table 5.2: Logit estimates for the adoption of sustainableforestmanagement 24
Table 6.1: Natural forest extraction of the adopter and control households 28
Table 6.2: Impact of adoption on forest extraction activities 29
Table: 7.1 Estimated transaction cost of the experiment 30
iii
ACRONYMS
5MHRP 5 Million Hectare Reforestation Program
CDM Clean Development Mechanism
CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research
CPC Commune People’s Committee
DPC District People’s Committees
ES Environmental Service
FIS Forest Inspection Station
MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
PAM United Nations’ Food Program
PES PaymentsforEnvironmentalServices
PPC Provincial People’s Committee
SFEs State Forest Enterprises
TC Transaction costs
VND Vietnamese Dong
iv
ABSTRACT
This study assessed the potential for the PES conservation approachin Vietnam.
This was done through a review of the country’s legal framework and by conducting an
experimental PES scheme involving sustainableforest management. The work was
constrained by the fact that all land in Vietnam is state-owned and that there has been
limited ES market development in the country. However, the results of the PES experiment
(in forest areas where the fundamental conditions for PES were met) were quite promising.
Participation in the trial scheme was good, despite the fact that it was an experiment of
limited duration. Moreover, institutional support for this kind of PES initiative was found to
be already available and effective. Expected environmental impacts were also observed:
The sustainableforestmanagement regime that was tied to the PES scheme resulted in a
reduction in both soil erosion and in destructive natural forest extraction activities. In light
of these findings, it is suggested that more practical policy/program trials should be
implemented. These will allow Vietnamese policy makers to gain more experience and
knowledge before the large-scale implementation of PES is tried in the country.
v
[...]... households and individuals for management and protection Protection forests: A management board is also established for protection forests of 5,000 ha and above If the protection forest area is more than 20,000 ha in area, a Forest Protection Unit will be set up under the Protection ForestManagement Board Protection forests of less than 5,000 ha in area are allocated to organizations, households and individuals... individuals can be owners of these forest categories, albeit with restricted forest use rights 3.2.2 Forest and Forest land Contracts and Allocation State forest enterprises, and the management boards of special use and protection forests, sign afforestation and forest protection contracts with households and individuals (who are legally residing in the relevant localities) for the long-term protection and... budget to invest in the protection and development of special use forests and protection forests; loans are provided 10 to production forests The annual payment made for the protection of special use forests and protection forests is VND 50 thousand (equivalent to USD 3.5) per ha The Government also allocates VND 2.5 million for the planting and tending of each hectare of protection forest for an initial... with or contracted to manage forest and forest land The benefit-sharing policies cover the three main types of forest and forest land Brief details of these regulations and obligations are as follows: Special use forest: Households and individuals to who special use forest has been allocated by the state for management and protection are funded by the state Alongside this forestmanagement work, they... that can be allocated to households and individuals In the past only barren land and plantations could be allocated to households and individuals Now, special use forest (less than 1000 ha), protection forest (less than 5000 ha, or scattered plots) and natural production forest can be allocated or contracted to households and individuals for management and protection This means that households and individuals... of forest resources, special use forests and protection forests are under the unified management of the state The following management mechanisms are used for the different forest classifications: Special use forests: A management board is established for special use forests that have an area of concentrated forest cover of over 1000 ha Special use forests of less than 1000 ha are allocated to organizations,... rights and obligations of households/individuals who have been allocated forest land for benefit sharing The Ordinances, Resolutions, Orders, Decrees, Decisions, Directives and Circulars mentioned above define, among other things: (1) the ownership of forest and forest land; (2) forest and forest land contracts and allocation; and (3) benefit sharing policy 3.2.1 Ownership In Vietnam land belongs to the... land user wants to remain involved The State also contracts forestland to organizations, households and individuals The duration of these contracts depends on the type of forest (for protection forests and special use forest it is 50 years; for production forests it depends on the business rotation schedule) There is no restriction on the scale of forestland leased to households and individuals in this... Committee The FIS’s tasks include: (1) propagating, popularizing and monitoring the implementation of laws on forestmanagement and development in the region; and (2) issuing licenses to households to exploit production forests In this experiment, the FIS and its substation monitored the adoption of the sustainableforestmanagement strategy by participating households It also undertook enforcement work when... pioneer in developing systems of paymentsforenvironmentalservices Land users can receive paymentsfor specified land uses, including new plantations, sustainable logging and the conservation of natural forests Payments are made over five years, but land users are obligated to maintain the specified land use for a further 10-15 years This program has apparently been very popular and requests to participate . rewards to some upland farmers to encourage
them to afforest and reforest bare hills and mountains and other areas. In Vietnam, upland
reforestation and afforestation.
Payments for Environmental Services in Vietnam:
Assessing an Economic Approach to Sustainable Forest
Management