Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 167 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
167
Dung lượng
14,81 MB
Nội dung
C
O
R
IN
T
H
RESULTS OF
EXCAVATIONS
CONDUCTED
BY
THE
AMERICAN SCHOOL
OF CLASSICAL
STUDIES
AT ATHENS
VOLUME
IX
SCULPTURE
1896-1923
13BY
FRANKLIN
P.
JOHNSON
PUBLISHED
FOR
THE
AMERICAN
SCHOOL
OF
CLASSICAL
STUDIES AT
ATHENS
HARVARD
UNIVERSITY
PRESS
CAMBRIDGE,
MASSACHUSETTS
1931
COPYRIGHT,
1931
BY THE
TRUSTEES
OF
THE
AMERICAN SCHOOL
OF CLASSICAL
STUDIES
AT
ATHENS
ALL
RIGHTS
RESERVED
PRINTED
AT THE
HARVARD
UNIVERSITY
PRESS
CAMBRIDGE,
MASS.,
U.S.
A.
THIS
publication
of
the
results of the
excavations
carried on
at
Corinth
by
the
American
School of
Classical
Studies
at Athens
is
in
charge
of
the
Publication Committee of
the School.
The
general
editor
is
Professor
Harold
North
Fowler.
Opinions
expressed
are those
of
the individual
contributors.
GEORGE
H.
CHASE
HAROLD
N. FOWLER
DAVID
M.
ROBINSON
Publication Committee
PREFACE
WHILE
a
member
of the American School
in
1922 and 1923,
I
made a
catalogue
of
the
sculptures
in
the
museum at Old Corinth.
In
November, 1924,
Professor
Fowler
asked me
to
prepare,
on
the
basis of that
catalogue,
the volume
dealing
with
sculpture
in
the
general
publication
of
the excavations at
Corinth. He
observed
that
the
material
could
not well be
published
until the excavation
should
be
at an
end,
since
I
was
expected
to include the
sculptures
found
in
the later
campaigns
as well as
those
that
I
had
catalogued.
In
Feb-
ruary, 1927,
he
asked
me
to
proceed
with the
publication
of the
sculptures
found before
1923,
the
rest to
be
dealt with
otherwise.
In
August,
1926,
I
had
sent to
the
School
a
request
for
photographs,
and after
various
developments
the first and
principal
batch
arrived
in
the autumn
of
1928. With
the aid of these
photographs,
the
revised
and
expanded
version
was
prepared
in
the summer
of
1929,
and has
undergone
little
alteration
since
then.
Through
the
kindness
of
Professor
Leroy
Waterman
of the
University
of
Michigan,
I
had
an
unexpected
opportunity
for a
very
brief
visit to
Greece
in
the
latter
part
of that
sum-
mer,
and
spent
about
twenty-four
hours at Corinth.
The
original
catalogue
embraced
many sculptures
that were not found
in
the excava-
tions.
Of
course
they
have
no
proper
place
here,
but
a
few
of them have been retained
for
one reason
or another.
It was
sometimes
impossible
to ascertain whether
sculptures
that
were
not
in
the
inventory
had
come from the
excavated
area
or
not.
Presumably
none of
them
was found
in
the
regular
course
of
a
campaign,
but new
fragments
are
likely
to become
visible
in
the
trenches
after
any
rain.
The
inventory
number
is
placed
in
parentheses
after each title. Where no such num-
ber
appears,
the
piece
had not been
entered
in
the
inventory
before 1923.
In
the
text,
"No.
100" means
the
sculpture
so numbered
in
this
volume;
"100" means the
sculpture
numbered
100
in
the
inventory;
but where
any
confusion seemed
possible,
the
inventory
numbers
are
preceded
by
"Inv."
In the
original catalogue
there was
usually
no indication
of
the
places
in
which the
sculptures
were
found. It
would
be a difficult task to
find
such indications
in
the note-
books
and
to
state them
in
terms
which
would be clear
as
applying
to
the excavated area
as
it
is at
present.
In
the official
publication,
however,
the lack
of
information
on this
point
is
a
grave
defect.
I
have had
no
opportunity
to mend
it
except
during
my
day
at
Corinth
in
the
summer
of 1929.
At
that
time
I
copied
from the
inventory
the notes
to
be
found
there
in
regard
to the
places
of
discovery
of
the
more
important
pieces.
These
notes
now
appear
almost
word
for word as
in the
inventory.
In
some
instances
it
has been
possi-
ble
to
reproduce
statements
that
appeared
in
previous publications.
A
"Martyr"
is of
course
a
column
of earth left
standing
to show the
original
surface
of
the
ground.
"
Simadi"
has
the
same
meaning.
Some
of the
photographs
were
printed
from
plates
made
years
ago
as
the
sculptures
were
found,
but the
great majority
are
newly
made.
The
heavy
task
of
finding
the
sculptures
and
supervising
the
photography
was
performed
by
Dr. F.
J. DeWaele.
Ade-
quate
illustrations
are the
really
essential
part
of such
a
publication
as
this;
and
since
viii
PREFACE
Dr. DeWaele's name
does
not
appear
on the
title-page,
I
wish to
make it clear
that he
deserves
credit
for
a
great
portion
of
the
work.
It
is
regrettable
that additional views of
some
of
the more
important
statues could
not be
presented.
Some
of
them
are
so
placed
in
the
museum that
they
can
be
photographed
from
only
one
angle.
In two
sections
of
the excavated
area,
the
theatre
and
the "Julian
Basilica,"
the
frag-
ments
belong
to a
relatively
small number
of
figures, joins
are found
frequently,
and future
excavations
will
unquestionably go
far to
complete
many sculptures
that now are
frag-
mentary.
In
most
of
the
area,
however, fragments
that
belong
together
-
even
fragments
that can
possibly
belong
together
-
are
comparatively
few.
It
is
planned
that all the
sculptures
found at
any
time
in
the
theatre will be
published
eventually
by
Edward
Capps,
Jr.
In
general,
however,
those that were
included
in
my
cata-
logue
are
included
here
also;
but
two series
of
reliefs,
a
Gigantomachia
and
an Amazono-
machia,
have been omitted. Both
have been
greatly
increased
by
the
recent
campaigns,
and it
seemed
useless to
publish
a
study
based on
only
a
part
of
the known
material.
Pausanias found
in
Corinth few works of
art
belonging
to
the
period
before
Mummius,
and the excavators have not been more
fortunate. Not a
single
piece
of
sculpture
in
any
sort
of
preservation
remains
from
the
great
Greek
period.
There
are,
however,
valuable
copies
from several
noteworthy
originals:
Nos.
4-11, 13, 53, 96,
83
(the
last a
tantalizingly
small
fragment which,
we
may
hope,
will be
completed by
continued work in
the
theatre).
The
portraits
from
the
"Julian Basilica"
present interesting
problems
in
iconography,
but
others,
as Nos.
168,
169,
and
182,
have
greater
intrinsic
value. The
"Miscellaneous
Re-
liefs"
include a number
of
puzzles
that I
have
not
solved.
The
great
majority
of
the
sculptures
belong
to
the
first
three
centuries
after
Christ,
with
a
sprinkling
of
fragments
from
the classical
Greek
period;
but
the
really
remarkable
things
are earlier
or
later. The
Mycenaean
face,
No.
2,
whose
character was
discerned
by
Blegen,
is a
unique
monument. The
magnificent portrait
of
the
fourth
century
after
Christ,
No.
321,
is
very poorly
illustrated,
but will
not
be
forgotten
by
anyone
who
has seen it. In
figure
sculpture
of
the fifth and sixth
centuries after
Christ,
the
little
building
at
Old
Corinth
has
an assured
place
among
the world's
great
museums.
In
conclusion
I
wish
to
express my
gratitude
to the
General
Editor
and to
the
other
members
of
the
Publication
Committee.
They
have
chosen the
illustrations
to be
included
and determined the size of
the cuts.
Furthermore
they
have
all
read
the
proofs
and
made
many
suggestions
of
great
value.
I
cannot evade
responsibility,
however,
for
anything
in
the
text
except
the
spelling
of
proper
names and
similar
formal details.
FRANKLIN P.
JOHNSON
UNIVERSITY OF
CHICAGO,
January
22,
1931
CONTENTS
SCULPTURE
SCULPTURES EARLIER
THAN
THE
CLASSICAL
PERIOD,
NOS.
1-3 3
THE
CLASSICAL
PERIOD,
Nos. 4-320
Sculptures
Other
than
Portraits,
Nos. 4-133
7
Portraits
from the "Julian
Basilica,"
Nos. 134-158
70
Other
Portraits,
Nos. 159-202
.
.
. .
.
85
Animals,
Attributes, etc.,
Nos.
203-216
.
.
. .
. 98
Sculptures
from
the
Stoa of the Colossal
Figures,
Nos.
217-226
. .
101
Other
Decorative
Sculptures,
in
the Round
and
in
High
Relief,
Nos.
227-237
.
107
Sarcophagi,
Nos.
238-244
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.111
Grave
Stelae,
Nos. 245-262
.
.
120
Votive
Reliefs,
Nos.
263-274
.
.
.
.
.
126
Miscellaneous
Reliefs,
Nos.
275-320
. .
.
131
FOURTH
CENTURY
AFTER
CHRIST
AND
LATER,
NOS. 321-332
.
148
TABLES
.
.
.
. . . .
.
. . .
.
. .
157
INDEX
.
. . .
.
.
.
. . .
. . .
. .
.
.
. . .
159
ABBREVIATIONS
A.
J.
A
American
Journal
of
Archaeology.
Amelung,
Fuhrer
durch Florenz
Amelung,
Walther:
Fuhrer
durch
die
Antiken in Florenz.
Munich,
1897.
Amelung,
Skulpt.
d. Vat.
Mus
Amelung,
Walther:
Die
Skulpturen
des
Vaticanischen
Museums.
Berlin,
1903-1908.
Ann. Scuol.
It.
At. Annuario della
Regia
Scuola
Archeologica
di
Atene.
Antike Plastik:
Walther
Amelung
Antike Plastik:
Walther
Amelung
zum
sechzigsten
Geburts-
tag.
Berlin and
Leipzig,
1928.
'Apx.
AEr7
'ApXatoXo'yLKov
AEXTrov.
'Apx.
'E
.
'ApXaLoXoytLK
'E
%4
epLs.
Arndt-Bruckmann
Griechische und
rcmische
Portrats,
nach
Auswahl und
Anord-
nung
von
Heinrich Brunn
und
Paul
Arndt.
Munich,
1891
Art Bull.
Art
Bulletin.
Ath. Mitt.
Mitteilungen
des
deutschen
archaeologischen
Instituts,
Athen-
ische
Abteilung.
B.
C.
H
Bulletin de
Correspondance
Hellenique.
B. Corn. Rom.
Bulletino
della
Commissione
Archeologica
Comunale
di
Roma.
Boll.
Arte
Bollettino d'Arte.
Brunn-Bruckmann
Denkmaler der
griechischen
und
romischen
Skulptur,
heraus-
gegeben
von
H.
Brunn,
fortgesetzt
von P.
Arndt.
Munich,
1888
B.
S.
A
Annual
of
the
British
School
at
Athens.
Carpenter,
Guide
Carpenter, Rhys:
Ancient
Corinth:
A
Guide
to the
Excava-
tions and Museum.
1928.
C.
I.
L.
Corpus Inscriptionum
Latinarum.
Cumont,
Musees
Royaux
Cumont,
Franz:
Musees
Royaux:
Catalogue
des
sculptures
et
inscriptions
antiques.
Brussels,
1913.
Daremberg-Saglio
Daremberg, Saglio,
Pottier:
Dictionnaire
des
antiquites
grecques
et romaines.
Paris,
1877-1918.
Diitschke
Dutschke,
H.:
Antike Bildwerke in
Oberitalien.
Leipzig,
1874-1882.
Einzelaufnahmen
Arndt, Paul,
and
Amelung,
Walther:
Photographische
Ein-
zelaufnahmen
antiker
Skulpturen. Munich,
1893
Esperandieu,
Recueil
General
Esperandieu:
Recueil
general
des
bas-reliefs,
statues et
bustes
de
la
Gaule romaine.
Paris,
1907-1929.
xii
ABBREVIATIONS
Hekler,
Romische
weibliche
Gewand- This is
contained
in: Minchener
archdologische
Studien
statuen
dem
Andenken
Adolf
Furtwdnglers
gewidmet.
Munich,
1909.
Helbig,
Fuhrer
Helbig,
Wolfgang:
Fuhrer durch
die
offentlichen
Samm-
lungen
klassischer
Altertumer
in Rom.
3rd
edition,
Leipzig,
1912-1913.
Imhoof-Blumer
and
Gardner
Imhoof-Blumer, F.,
and
Gardner,
P.: Numismatic
Com-
mentary
on Pausanias.
Reprinted
from
J.
H. S. VI-
VIII.
London,
1885-1887.
Jb. Arch.
I
Jahrbuch
des kaiserlich
deuttschen
archaeologischen
Instituts.
Jh. Oest. Arch.
I.
Jahreshefte
des oesterreichischen
archaeologischen
Institutes
in Wien.
J.
H. S
.
Journal
of
Hellenic Studies.
J. Int.
Arch. Num.
Journal
international
d'archeologie
numismatique.
Lippold,
Antike
Skulpturen
Lippold,
Georg:
Antike
Skulpturen
der
Glyptothek
Ny
Carlsberg.
Leipzig,
1924.
Lippold,
Kopien
Lippold, Georg:
Kopien
und
Umbildungen
griechischer
Statuen.
Munich,
1923.
Marbres
Antiques
Catalogue
sommaire des marbres
antiques
(in
the
Louvre).
Paris,
1918.
Michaelis,
Ancient
Marbles
Michaelis,
Adolph:
Ancient
Marbles
in
Great
Britain.
Cambridge,
1882.
Mon. Ant.
Monumenti
Antichi
publicati
per
cura della
Reale
Accademia
dei Lincei.
Not. Scav Notizie
degli
Scavi
di Antichitd comunicate alla Reale
Accademia dei Lincei.
Pauly-Wissowa
Pauly's
Real-Encyclopadie
der klassischen Altertumswis-
senschaft.
Neue
Bearbeitung.
Unter
Mitwirkung
zahl-
reicher
Fachgenossen
herausgegeben
von
Georg
Wissowa
und
Wilhelm
Kroll.
Stuttgart,
1894
Poulsen,
Portratstudien
Poulsen,
Frederik:
Portratstudien
in Norditalienischen
Pro-
vinzmuseen.
(Historisk-Filologiske
Meddelelser
udgivne
af
det
Kgl.
Danske
Videnskabernes
Selskab, XV,
4).
Copenhagen,
1928.
R.
Arch .
Revue
archeologique.
Reinach,
Recueil
Reinach,
Salomon: Recueil
de tetes
antiques
ideales ou
idealisees.
Paris,
1903.
Reinach, Repertoire
Reinach,
Salomon:
Repertoire
de
la
statuaire
grecque
et
romaine.
Paris,
1897-1924.
R. Et. Anc
Revue
des etudes anciennes.
Rev. de 1'hist. des
religions
Revue de l'histoire des
religions.
Robert
Robert,
Carl: Die antiken
Sarcophagreliefs.
Berlin,
1890-
1904.
ABBREVIATIONS
xiii
Rom.
Mitt
Mitteilungen
des deutschen
archaeologischen
Instituts,
Rom-
ische
Abteilung.
Roscher,
Lexikon
Roscher,
W.
H.:
Ausfilhrliches
Lexikon
der
griechischen
und
romischen
Mythologie.
Leipzig,
1884
Ruesch,
Guida
Guida Illustrata
del Museo
Nazionale di
Napoli,
compilata
per
cura
di A.
Ruesch.
2nd
edition.
Naples,
no
date.
Springer-Wolters
Springer,
Anton:
Die Kunst des
Altertums.
12th
edition,
revised
by
Paul
Wolters.
Leipzig,
1923.
Statuenkopien
Furtwangler,
Adolf: Ueber
Statuenkopien
im Alterthum
(Abhandlungen
der
bayerischen
Akademie
der
Wissen-
schaften
zu
Miinchen,
XX,
1896).
Tod
and
Wace, Catalogue
Tod
T
,
M.
Tod
N.,
and
Wace,
N,
and
Wace,
A.
J.
B.:
A
Catalogue
of
the
Sparta
Musetnum.
Oxford,
1906.
SCULPTURE
[...]... m north of the Byzantine foundation wall of St John's; 820 was built into a Roman wall continuing the line of the " Boudroumi " shops 820 from shoulders to knees, 812 the rest of the figure and plinth; the two pieces join by contact Lacking: head, left arm, almost all of the right arm, part of the plinth, and all the toes of the left foot except part of the first The right shoulder, broken off when... the upper part of the wheel Traces of the end of the himation, which hung from the left shoulder, are perceptible at the top of the fragment The wheel is usually an attribute of Nemesis in art, though in literature the wheel of Tyche-Fortuna is familiar (Cook, Zeus, I, pp 268 ff.; Perdrizet, in B C H XXXVIII, 1914, pp 89-100) Pausanias mentions no Nemesis in Corinth, while the statue of Tyche in a temple... Soft brown stone Height of fragment, 0.30m.; width, 0.28m.; thickness, 0.03m.; height of face, 0.23 m.; relief height, 0.04 m Back roughly shaped The top edge is original, the edge at the spectator's left is broken; the other two are doubtful because of the roughness of the work The end of the nose is broken, and the mouth, chin, and lower part of the left cheek are lost holes indicate the pupils of. .. from the "Ceres" to the slight Because of the resemblance of the " Ceres" to the sculptures on the base of the Nemesis of Rhamnus, Furtwangler assigned it to Agoracritus and suggested that it might be a copy of the Nemesis Lippold denies this possibility (Kopien, p 249, note 62) A decision must depend on a comparison of the " Ceres " with the fragment of the head of the Nemesis in the British Museum... curious wide, flat folds of the chiton A consideration of the other examples of both types shows that there was a close relation also between the two originals They could hardly proceed from one artist; but the "Nemesis " could well be the work of a sculptor in whose studio the artist of the "Demeter" began his career 7 Female figure (68) Found May 18, 1899, "back of the north apse of Peirene," about six... indication of Attic origin (Lippold, Kopien, pp 10 f.) As for Calamis, there is less xapis and more loftiness, even in the head of the Conservatori copy, than in any of the heads called Calamidian; and the figure as a whole possesses an imposing majesty that is vastly different from the modest dignity of the Hestia Giustiniani The grandeur of Phidian style, as known from the sculptures of the Parthenon... under a fold of the garment just below the left breast Behind the right shoulder the quiver-strap leads to the top of a diagonal break, obviously resulting from the breaking away of the quiver; apparently the bottom of the quiver was in the bottom of the large break on the back of the left shoulder The weight rests on the right leg; the left foot is drawn back A marble support on the front of the right... deal in both upper and lower parts, but are somewhat more severe The draped deities on the east frieze of the temple of Athena Nike may also be compared No strong resemblance is discernible in any of the existing sculptures of the Parthenon For the treatment of the overfall the Maidens of the Erechtheum offer a good analogy Compare the figure in the British Museum (Paton and others, The Erechtheum,pl XXXVIII),... to it, and neither of the others has its head There is a relief in Athens, from Megara (ibid., p 224, fig 5; Svoronos, 'EOv'cKV MovO.e.ov, pl CXXII, p 440; museum No 1442), a work of the fifth century, in which the original of this type may be reflected The figure in the relief holds a bird and is probably Aphrodite The profile of the face is markedly similar to that of the head of a Greek statue in... the Perinthus head It may be noted that some of the hair above the centre of the forehead in the Perinthus head has been chiseled away at some time, so that the manner of its treatment is not accurately known (Herrmann, in Ath Mitt XVI, 1891, pp 314 f.) There must have been an interval of thirty years at least between the originals of the Naples head and of ours, and in this interval comes the Perinthus .
publication
of
the
results of the
excavations
carried on
at
Corinth
by
the
American
School of
Classical
Studies
at Athens
is
in
charge
of
the.
no sort
of
resemblance
to
any
of
the
heads
of
this
type,
and we
know
nothing
of
the head
that
belonged
to
the
original
of
the
Lateran