Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 44 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
44
Dung lượng
341 KB
Nội dung
Part one: introduction
I. Rationale ofthe study.
It is undeniable that English is an international language. English is considered as the
medium of communication in many different fields such as: science, technology, aviation,
international sport, diplomacy, and so on. English is also the official language of many
international organizations, such as: ASEAN, WTO, WHO, UN, etc. With the spread of
globalization and the rapid expansion of informational and technologies, there has been an
explosion inthe demand for English worldwide.
In Vietnam, in recent years, thestudyofEnglish has gained momentum. Because it is
partly the change in education policies of our government, and partly the people’s need.
English has been widely taught in schools, universities, companies as well as in organizations.
There are also many different English teaching programs available on radio, television and
internet.
It is widely accepted that one ofthe main purposes of studying English is to use it for
communications. Being able to speak English is an important criterion to assess a learner of
English. However, it is a common issue at my school that thestudents rarely speak English,
even inEnglish classes, though they have been learning English since they started atthe lower
secondary school.
Being a teacher ofahigh school, within my minor thesis, I would like to investigate the
reasons ofthe students’ inhibition and unwillingness to speak English, and I hope to be able to
make some recommendations that can help thestudents overcome their inhibition and
unwillingness, and thereby improve their speaking skills. This actually drives the researcher to
the study thesis, namely AstudyonimprovingEnglishSpeakingskillsto 10“
th
-form minority
students atGiaPhuHighSchoolintheNewSetofEnglish Textbook”.
II. Aims ofthe study.
The study is aimed at:
• Investigating the current Englishspeaking teaching and learning situations of grade
10 atGiaPhuHigh School.
1
• Identifying the factors which make thestudents inhibited or unwilling to speak
English in class.
• Making some suggestions for the teachers atGiaPhuHighSchool with the hope of
helping thestudents overcome their inhibition and unwillingness, and thereby
improve their speaking skills.
• Suggesting some realistic and appropriate class teaching techniques with the hope
that they can enhance the learners inspeaking skills.
III. Scope ofthe study.
To improve speakingskills for thestudentsatGiaPhuHigh School, various activities
can be used, and a number of things should be done. However, the researcher only intends to
overview a brief ofthe current situations of teaching and learning Englishspeakingskillsof
grade 10 atGiaPhuHigh School, and to identify the factors which make thestudents inhibited
and unwilling to speak English, and to make some recommendations to motivate studentsto
speak English more.
IV. Method ofthe study.
To realize the aims ofthe study, quantitative and qualitative methods have been used.
The data collected for thestudy came from two sources: the 10
th
- form student respondents and
the teacher-respondents atGiaPhuHigh School, Son La province.
Two questionnaires, one for students and the other for teachers, and an interview of
teachers are going to be used to collect information and evidence for the study. All the
comments, remarks, recommendations and conclusions provided inthestudy are based onthe
data analysis.
V. Design ofthe study
The minor thesis consists of three parts:
• The first part is an introduction tothe thesis which presents the factors as plan of
the study such as the rationale, aims, scope, methods and design ofthe study.
• Part two comes the second, in which a theoretical background, research
methodology, presentation of statistical, results and discussions were presented.
2
• The final part focuses onthe summary ofthe findings, the limitations ofthe
study and future directions for further research are also mentioned in this part.
3
Part two: development
Chapter I: literature review
Any study should have theories as its background. In my minor thesis, I base the study
on the theories which are the views from the famous linguists and methodologists onthe
concepts concerning language and methodology.
I. Communicative Language Teaching.
The history of language teaching has shown a lot of changes in approaches and methods,
which reflects the recognition of changes inthe sort of proficiency learners need. Teaching a
second language used to be aimed at enabling learners to read and appreciate class of literature.
Therefore, any teacher who was able to reach this aim was thought to be a good teacher (Le Van
Canh, 2004).
Most learners ofEnglish recently desire to be able to communicate with others inthe
language they learn. Parallel with this change inthe aim of learning English, methods of
teaching have been changed. For a long time, many language teaching methodologists have
constantly looked for the most appropriate way to teach English effectively. As a result, many
language teaching methods and approaches have come into being such as:
• Grammar-translation method
• The Direct method
• The Audio-lingual method
• The Audio-visual method
• Communicative Language Teaching.
Mackey (1965) remarks that most ofthe methods which have ever been developed still
continue to exist in one form or another as each method has its advantages and disadvantages.
For example, grammar-translation method is easy to implement and cheap to administer, which
makes it still be used in many classroom situations.
In this thesis, the author just focused on Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) as it
is considered one ofthe most effective approaches to teach learners to communicate ina
language they learnt. Accordingly, CLT has become an “umbrella” term which covers a wide
range of classroom practices.
4
1. Definition of CLT
So far, CLT has been viewed differently by different authors such as Wilkins (1972),
Nunan (1989), etc. According to Nunan (1989:194), “CLT views language as a system for the
expressions of meaning. Activities involve oral communication, carrying out meaning tasks and
using language, which is meaningful tothe learners. Objectives reflect the needs ofthe learners
including functional skills as well as linguistic objectives. The learner’s role is as a negotiator
and integrator. The teacher’s role is as a facilitator ofthe communication process.” It is thought
that this definition contains aspects that are common to many other definitions.
Margie S. Barns (1984:5), an expert inthe field of CLT, writes in explaining Firth’s view
that “language is interaction; it is interpersonal activity and has a clear relationship with society.
In this light, language study has to look atthe use (function) of language in context, both its
linguistic context (what is uttered before and after a given piece of discourse) and its social, or
situational, context ( who is speaking, what their social roles are, why they have come together
to speak)” (Ann Galloway. “Communicative Language Teaching: An introduction and Sample
Activities . ” Cal.org).
In this approach teachers often downplay accuracy and emphasize students’ ability to
convey their messages (Hammerly, 1991). In fact, the communicative approach does stress the
importance of both the forms and the uses of language. But it does not specify under what
circumstances it may be more appropriate to teach the forms through the uses, or to attach the
uses tothe forms, or to integrate them for communicative purposes. Perhaps it is the teacher’s
responsibility to judge and decide which priority is relevant in his own condition.
2. Characteristics of CLT
The communicative approach can be said to be the product of language educators and
linguists who became dissatisfied with the Audio-lingual and Grammar-Translation, Methods,
which could not enable learners to communicate inthe culture ofthe target language.
David Nunan (1991) points out five features of CLT:
• An emphasis on learning to communicate through interaction inthe target language.
• The introduction of authentic texts into the learning situation.
• The provision of opportunities for learners to focus, not only on language but also on
the learning process itself.
5
• An enhancement ofthe learner’s own personal experiences as important contributing
elements to classroom learning.
• An attempt to link classroom language with language activities outside the classroom.
All features above are claimed by practitioners of CLT to show that they are very
interested inthe needs and desires ofthe learners as well as the connection between the
language as it is taught in their classroom and as it is used outside the classroom. Under this
broad umbrella definition, any teaching practice that helps students develop their
communicative competence in an authentic context is deemed an acceptable and beneficial form
of instruction. Thus, inthe classroom CLT often takes theformof pair work and group work
requiring negotiation and cooperation among learners to develop their confidence, role plays in
which students practice and develop language functions as well as judicious use of grammar and
pronunciation focused activities.
3. Communicative Competence.
Inthe history ofEnglish language teaching, there have been two definitions of
communicative competence which is currently considered the primary goal of language
teaching.
Many teachers, methodologists and linguistics who work on foreign language teaching
tend to define communicative competence simply as interaction inthe target language
( Sagvinon, 1983; Rivers, 1987). However, others who work in ESL tend to be in favor of
Hymens’ theory of communicative competence. In Hymes’s theory (adapted from Dash, B.K
1985), communicative competence includes not only the linguistic forms ofthe language but
also its social rules, the knowledge of when, how and to whom it is appropriate to use these
forms. It means that the socio-cultural rules for language use are also included inthe teaching
process.
In fact, Hymes coined this term in order to contrast a communicative view of language
and Chomsky’s theory of competence. In Chomsky’s view, linguistic theory is concerned
primarily with an ideal speaker-hearer ina completely homogeneous speech community who
can use its language perfectly and is unaffected by such grammatical irrelevant conditional as
memory limitation, distractions, shifts of attention and interest and errors in applying his
knowledge ofthe language in actual performance. (Chomsky, 1965-adapted from Le Van Canh
2004). This mean that, Chomsky’s linguistic view focuses too much onthe “correctness” but
6
does not pay adequate attention tothe socio-culture of language. It is clear that Hymes’s theory
of communicative competence offers a much more comprehensive view than Chomsky’s theory.
Canale and Swain (1980) consider communicative competence as the combination ofthe
competences of five areas: rules of grammar (Grammatical competence), rules of discourse
(discourse competence), sociocultureral rules of use, probability rules of occurrence and
communication strategies.
3.1. Grammatical competence
Grammatical competence is the mastery ofthe linguistic code, the ability to recognize the“
lexical, morphological, syntactic and phonological features ofa language and to manipulate these
features to forms words and sentences”. (Sagvinon, 1983:37).
3.2. Discourse competence
It includes the ability to produce and recognize coherent and cohesive text. Discourse
competence is dependent onthe knowledge shared by speaker/writer and hearer/reader:
knowledge ofthe real word, knowledge ofthe linguistic code, knowledge ofthe discourse
structures and knowledge of social setting.
3.3. Sociolinguistic competence
The competence of sociocultural rules of use is the ability to interpret and express
functional and social meaning of language, depending on degrees of formality, setting, topic,
channel and purpose of communication. Sociocultural competence is an understanding ofthe
social context in which language is used.
3.4. Probability rules of occurrence
This competence is the ability to recognize what communication functions are likely to
be expressed ina given context and what are not. A person can acquired more of this
competence through using the language in real communication than in classroom practice.
According to Canale and Swain (1980), a learner can not have a satisfactory communicative
competence if not any of his knowledge of probability of occurrence of grammatical forms and
communicative functions is developed.
3.5. Communicative strategies
7
According to Richard’s opinion (ELTJ V37 N2, 1983), communicative strategies include:
• Speaker’s repertoire of verbal and visual gestures which signal interest in what the
partner is saying.
• Speaker’s stock of topics and formulaic utterances which are produced at relevant points
in discourse such as a small talk which is required to make brief encounters with
acquaintances comfortable and positive.
• Awareness when to talk and what to talk in an appropriate use of turn-taking
conversations.
• Communicative strategies also include the ability to adapt when one’s message is not
taken, and to sustain communication by paraphrase, circumlocution, repetition,
hesitation, avoidance and shift in register and style.
The learner is expected to master not only the transactional skills but also interactional
skills, which are an important component of communicative competence.
II. Nature of language skills and oral communication
1. Nature of language skills
It has known that language communication involves some skills which consist of four
micro inter related skills: listening, speaking, reading and writing. That is the reason why
learners ofEnglish are required to have an adequate mastery ofthe four skills. Nevertheless, the
degree of fluency of each skill, which is a learner requires, depend onthe course purposes.
As for Byrne (1991), among the four skills, listening and reading are considered as the
receptive skills, speaking and writing as the productive skills. They are also divided according to
the manners by which they are formed. Theskillsin connection with manual script including
reading and writing are called literacy skills. The ones which are related to articulator organs
are called the oral skills consisting of listening and speaking. Ofthe four skills, speaking plays a
very important role since it is the step to identify who knows or does not know a language.
Anyone who knows a foreign language can speak that language. Pattison (1992) confirms that
when a person speaks of knowing or learning a language they mean being able to speak the
language.
2. Oral communication
8
It is the view from Byrne opinion (1991:9), with regard tothe relation between speaking
and listening. it has seen that speaking and listening skillsin communication are
complementary. From a communicative, pragmatic view ofthe language classroom, speaking
and listening skills are closely intertwined. The interaction between these two modes of
performance applies especially strongly to conversation, the most popular discourse category in
the profession. Speaking always necessitates at least two participants speaker(s) and listener(s).
When the speaker starts the message, the listener decodes, and responds tothe message in turns.
Therefore, nature of oral communication is comprehended as a two-way process between the
speaker and listener. Oral communication is effective only when the learners are supplied with
oral skills”(Byrne, 1991:9). Hence, that is why teaching listening is always associated with
teaching speaking skills.
Martin Bygate (1991:22) divided oral skills into negotiation skills and production skills
in which the former are divided into interaction management and negotiation of meaning with
two sub skills.
•
Agenda management refer tothe right of participants, choice ofthe topics and how they are
developed and of how much time the conversation should be prolonged.
•
Turn taking (McCarthy, 1993:127), means that the speaker has to discern (perceive clear
when to take the floor and when to leave at another the speaker take turn.)
Production skills takes that the speakers are always overwhelmed by time pressure from
the moment they decide what to say, how to state tothe time they say it out. This excuse helps
them protect themselves by using instrument so as to expedite production and compensate for
difficulties. Production skills are divided into two sub-skills, as follows:
• Facilitation skills as opinion of Bygate (1991:15) suggested that the use of simple
structures, ellipsis, customary expressions and fillers or halting devices such as you know,
you see, ok.
• Compensation skills comprise self, correction, false start, recitation and rephrasing.
As stated above, these provide conditions to enable learners’ speaking ability. However,
to obtain a good speaking ability, according to Bygate, learners ofEnglish are required to have
background relevant tothe on-going communication. They need to understand what they are
going to talk and also to master some particular grammar points and language skills. The
procedures that learners have to undergo to make themselves orally understood are the steps the
teachers can interfere to develop learners’ speaking ability.
III. Nature ofspeakingskills and development of teaching speaking skills.
9
Speaking is in many ways an undervalued skill. Perhaps this is because we can almost
speak, and so take the skill a lot for granted. speaking is often thought of as a popular formof
expression which uses the unprestigious ‘colloquial’ register: literary skills are onthe whole
more prized. This negative neglect may also facile, superficial, or glib. Could it be that the
negative aspects of behaviorist teaching techniques which focused largely onthe teaching of
oral language have become associated with the skill itself.
Martin Bygate (1997:1) argues that speaking is a skill which deserves attention every bit
as much as literary skillsin both first and second language. Our learners often need to be able to
speak with confidence to carry out many of their most basic transactions. It is theskills by
which they are most frequently judged and through which they may make friends or lose
friends. It is the vehicle par excellence of social solidarity, of social ranking, of professional
advancement and of business. It is also a medium through which much language is learned, and
which for many is particularly conductive for learning. Perhaps, then the teaching ofspeaking
merits more thought. to be the most vital skill ofthe four language skills. In order to find the
techniques to improve speakingskills we must be aware of nature of this skills.
One ofthe basic problems in foreign language teaching, as Martin Bygate’s (1997:3) is
to prepare studentsto be able to use the language. How this preparation is done, and how
successful it is, depend on how teachers understand their aims. For example, it is obvious that in
order to be able to speak a foreign language, it is necessary to know a certain amount of
grammar and vocabulary. Part ofa language course is therefore generally devoted to this
objective. But there are other things involved inspeaking and are important to know what this
might be. For instance, to test whether students can speak, it is necessary to get them to actually
say something. To do like this, they must act on knowledge of vocabulary and grammar. By
giving students ‘speaking practice’ and oral exams, we recognize that there is a difference
between knowledge about a language and skillsin using it. This distinction between knowledge
and skills is crucial in teaching and speaking.
Martin Bygate adds that when we speak, we do not merely know how to assemble
sentences inthe abstract, we have to produce them and adapt them tothe circumstances. It
means making decisions rapidly, implementing them smoothly, and adjusting our conversations
as unexpected problems appear in our path.
1. Nature ofspeakingskills and oral Interaction
1.1. Definition ofspeaking (spoken language).
10
[...]... in preparing the lessons In summary, we can see from the findings that the interview can really provide in depth the information about the reality ofspeaking teaching to 10 th grate atGiaPhu High SchoolIn general, the teachers’ repertoires ofspeaking teaching activities are not really varied, their knowledge ofspeaking steps is not really good and their opinions on their criteria for a good speaking. .. their speaking teaching (question 3) All ofthe five teachers asked admit they have been trained in CLT Three of them are trained inEnglish teaching-training courses and two others in an English teaching workshop They also admit they have applied CLT in their speaking teaching but not others such as Audio-lingual Grammar-Translation, etc because they argue that CLT is the best teaching approach to improve... thespeaking topics inthetextbookEnglish 10” interesting which takes 60% 34% finds the topics all right The number ofstudents that have negative assessment is minimal, only six percent The result reveals that speaking topics inthetextbook are not the factor that causes to unexciting atmosphere inspeaking classes, because the rate ofstudents that has positive assessment ofthe topics takes the. .. from the famous linguistics and methodologists on some aspects of language teaching such as ‘Communicative Language Teaching’, ‘Nature of language skills and oral communication’ and the theories on some concepts such as ‘Nature ofspeakingskills and development of teaching speakingskills , ‘Oral language’ The author hopes they are a good theoretical basis so that the author can fulfill the minor thesis... needs to be some necessary changes in giving speaking topics and conducting speaking classes by the teachers atGiaPhuHigh School, whereas the statistics from questions 14 shows that the teachers here have taken stock inimprovingstudentsspeakingskills by using speaking -improving activities such as group-work or pair-work, and making thestudents see the advantages ofthe activities In summary,... summary, from the data collected, it can be seen that the 10 th -form studentsatGiaPhuHighSchool find that speaking topics inthetextbookEnglish 10” interesting The majority ofthestudents who were asked admit that Englishspeakingskills is very important to them However, they are not really interested inspeakingEnglishin class and often feel reluctant to speak it in class The reasons for this... that outside classroom they are not accustomed tospeaking English, and especially they not only communicate in Vietnamese but also in their minority language, e.g Thai, Muong, H’Mong, Dao languages However, inEnglish classes, the teachers have to make speakingEnglish their habit Only by doing this way, can students language learning gain the right goal to communicate The research has shown that... mistakes, let studentsto speak or ignore It is known that impatience and intolerance in any situation, especially in teaching bring out not good effect d Teachers’ current techniques to motivate reluctant speaking learners atGiaPhu High SchoolThe information about this aspect is the aim ofthe questions 8, 9 and 10 Helping students interested ina lesson is an art in teaching Being asked about the. .. the task It is clear that giving a speaker experience ina hearer’s role is more helpful than simple practice in tasks in which a speaker is having real difficulties in appreciating what a particular task required Martin Bygate (1997:24,25) suggested that conversation can be analyzed in term of routines, which are conventional ways of presenting information As far as we have known, there are two kinds... of routine: “ information routines” and “ interaction routines” 12 Information routines frequently recur information structures, including stories; descriptions of places and people; presentation of facts, comparisons, instructions Interaction routines are the ones based not so much on sequences of kinds of terms occurring in typical kinds of interactions These routines thus can be characterized in . language of many
international organizations, such as: ASEAN, WTO, WHO, UN, etc. With the spread of
globalization and the rapid expansion of informational and. study.
The study is aimed at:
• Investigating the current English speaking teaching and learning situations of grade
10 at Gia Phu High School.
1
• Identifying