... 2011:21http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2011/1/21Page 10 of 17Since p is an odd number, then we have u1(m, n) ≡ u2(m, n), and the proof iscomplete. The following theorem deals with the continuous dependence of the solution of (26)and ... in the first variable, while decreasing in the second variable” in Theorem 2.1, which is unnecessary for the proof since a(m)=m, b(n )=n, then Theore m 2.1 reduc es to [[14], Theorem 3]. Furthermore, ... g(m, n) ≡ 0,q =1,p ≥ 1, then Theorem 2.1 reduces to [[13], Theorem 1].Following a similar process as the proof of Theorem 2.1, we have the following threetheorems.Theorem 2.2.Supposeu, a,...