- đánh giá hiệu quả kinh tế.
Trường đại học Nông nghiệp HàN ội Ờ Luận văn thạc sỹ khoa học Nông nghiệp ẦẦẦẦẦẦẦẦẦ 73 DAM$ NOS CSDTL
DAM$ NOS CSDTL N1 9 1.92556 N2 9 2.33556 N3 9 2.52333 SE(N= 9) 0.293587E-01 5%LSD 12DF 0.904641E-01 --- MEANS FOR EFFECT MDO$*DAM$
--- MDO$ DAM$ NOS CSDTL
M1 N1 3 2.12000 M1 N2 3 2.59667 M1 N3 3 2.91333 M2 N1 3 2.00333 M2 N2 3 2.49333 M2 N3 3 2.62000 M3 N1 3 1.65333 M3 N2 3 1.91667 M3 N3 3 2.03667 SE(N= 3) 0.508507E-01 5%LSD 12DF 0.156688 --- ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE CSDTL60 9/ 9/13 10:43
--- :PAGE 3
thiet ke kieu slip-plot
F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1
VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |NHACLAI |MDO$ |error(a)|DAM$ |MDO$*DAM|
(N= 27) --- SD/MEAN | | | | |$ |
NO. BASED ON BASED ON % | | | | | |
OBS. TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | | |
CSDTL 27 2.2615 0.40146 0.88076E-01 3.9 0.5981 0.0014 0.2170 0.0000 0.0180
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CSDTL FILE CSDTL80 9/ 9/13 10:19
--- :PAGE 1
thiet ke kieu slip-plot VARIATE V004 CSDTL m2la/m2dat
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= 1 NHACLAI 2 .540373E-02 .270187E-02 0.38 0.696 6 2 MDO$ 2 3.33048 1.66524 493.58 0.000 3 3 error(a) 4 .134952E-01 .337381E-02 0.47 0.755 6 4 DAM$ 2 .596846 .298423 41.99 0.000 6 5 MDO$*DAM$ 4 .125498 .313744E-01 4.41 0.020 6 * RESIDUAL 12 .852907E-01 .710756E-02
--- * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 26 4.15701 .159885
--- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE CSDTL80 9/ 9/13 10:19
--- :PAGE 2
thiet ke kieu slip-plot MEANS FOR EFFECT NHACLAI
--- NHACLAI NOS CSDTL
Trường đại học Nông nghiệp Hà Nội Ờ Luận văn thạc sỹ khoa học Nông nghiệp ẦẦẦẦẦẦẦẦẦ 74 2 9 1.87547