III. TÀI LIỆU INTERNET
Thí nghiệm 3: Ảnh hưởng của số lần xử lý EMINA đến năng suất và các yếu tốc ấu thành n ăng suất của khoai tây
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE C/K FILE NS3 3/ 8/14 7:44
--- :PAGE 1 VARIATE V003 C/K LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= 1 CT$ 6 1.16952 .194921 4.26 0.012 2 * RESIDUAL 14 .640000 .457143E-01
--- * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 1.80952 .904762E-01
--- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE KLK FILE NS3 3/ 8/14 7:44
--- :PAGE 2 VARIATE V004 KLK LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= 1 CT$ 6 75878.6 12646.4 12.32 0.000 2 * RESIDUAL 14 14366.7 1026.19 --- * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 90245.2 4512.26 --- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE KLC FILE NS3 3/ 8/14 7:44
--- :PAGE 3 VARIATE V005 KLC LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= 1 CT$ 6 4129.05 688.176 7.67 0.001 2 * RESIDUAL 14 1256.06 89.7184 --- * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 5385.11 269.256 --- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE NSLT FILE NS3 3/ 8/14 7:44
--- :PAGE 4 VARIATE V006 NSLT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= 1 CT$ 6 189.696 31.6161 12.32 0.000 2 * RESIDUAL 14 35.9167 2.56548 --- * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 225.613 11.2807 --- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE NSTT FILE NS3 3/ 8/14 7:44
--- :PAGE 5 VARIATE V007 NSTT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= 1 CT$ 6 56.7962 9.46603 4.97 0.007 2 * RESIDUAL 14 26.6733 1.90524 --- * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 20 83.4695 4.17348 --- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE NS3 3/ 8/14 7:44
--- :PAGE 6 MEANS FOR EFFECT CT$
--- CT$ NOS C/K KLK KLC NSLT CT1 3 3.13333 385.000 122.908 19.2500
Học viện Nông nghiệp Việt Nam – Luận văn Thạc sỹ Khoa học Nông nghiệp Page 101 CT2 3 3.13333 516.667 165.098 25.8333