RRA, MRR MMM AZALS 76.53%, HREM SES ATK,
44.23 EBA RR K45 = VLE eG SR K REE ROR EET
BỊ 4.26 Bq bas, AES BT NTE Ae tS OR RK,
70.54% HN) BSW A OA RT EZR OR E9 BY a RET BR
(it, FO LUMPS, bb 55.35%, địlÈn[ WL, BEATAR E.
32JHJ, WEE ULE AURA 2s GR BEINN, eH ANT,
GALE — TRE, #ẩk l-3⁄“3J##*ủẩMfW#lJTfE. l2}, ỡÁA3S‡tÍbh. ES 2 TE) ỉ4 FR -†-†Ä ĐI BR ER BE ft HJ3k‡# Xi 7418 hi? AE] OR eg {Rtfl A GPT HG 52.68%, 53.57%.
MEK 4.24 (SSE, STOR EUR. eR. ae RUE GY FE PLY 9 2d PN 3.68. 3.96, 3.61 93.62. RATA, ì4=lM#(/ #212935 3.6, (IGE EPG op AY) 4.00.
#0, HRT PTA ABER, DU SARS
KAA 4. AE, BTR Ai eet K46 PETE VLE RSA EA Aah FMR ES ROR ớù A (9820Ắ1.
108
f4{ 72t †'‡È fr#T'6tiklf
19,64% 17,86%
33,04% 35.71%
37,50% 38,39%
8,04% 6.25%
179% 1.79%
FA 4. 26 2&Jẹ##J K46 SAE TE VLE RBC EEF 2] RSA Pe ER RF 3] AOR
+ Im=[=l te [an
———
Valid N (listwise}
109
PE SIAN, f{†1& ủlJ#xlftftJ¿j 39694. oR ANT
RADLEY — PRE, # L3⁄3Jf*ủẩIWWEIJWR. UES, WAS. BS
2 TY EPR #£È BEA Fe PES 0018 hi AE) RY
FELT AALS th 84.62%, 57.69%.
FRIEZE 4.25 (XE, TỊUJƒ9ãml l3. MA. AAR ICE LEP iFM IDF OP 438. 4.65. 4.124#13.92. RATA.
KE MARKO BAAN 4.2. (AIGA HE BIDE Bp AY 4.7.
#10, HEAT PTE PO AER, RS AR AT A LE PRL TPL FRR FAN EZR E TEND FI KAN 4, SE it PIT #93 4.5. BllL, BRU AeA eR K46 *“'Eff: VLE
RBA AE TAN BS REESE >J L3 fù 3ớ A 920W).
FA 4. 27 i2 HEM K47 AE TE VLE Sie AE AT Rzt Fe REPS 2] #28
110
Em mm.
es a a
Valid N
Valid N distwise) |
# 4.25 VERA RR K47 =F VLE eG SR K REE ROR EET
RS, PASTORATE MAES AMA MER. ýÂ li. WAT PRUE CELE ICR AU RE — RY, 07
0A, WEAR EA) RA TAR. ORR A
WRI. PAS RL. LEI EAE LEY TES. SCH es ve Bì, EAM 2 HANG TE BG UR FR AY 2 1 AB, eR SAE: fy SS EAS HY
We. H202, Bee AR CERRY O) ROR SS ae Sk SBN. f3 2+ ˆ#J#J79 3.8. RAR A HBO ET eR A AE. CATR
#2 *#HIX\U#. Alt, ATUL MARMARA, JPR AGED RPE TE ERAS 2) PH BERS A A AR. OMT ET WA HE (BEAR Io OD USK AN HE PEA Ne A AR SCI AS I
42 Hit FRN 4.2.1. Ze
BETA EBT Se A đã š, VLE RAMA SH THC RA SCHL PER f9 AS THEA A SIR EB, 3Í ỡŸ{šIỉ 7ý VLE BERT 3“: 3] ORY BE Oe AE RHE
ARWE Fe TE SP HTP x ASE AE HE VLE RSC eH AN FR TPR CAR, HGH SSSR. HH, ủ S409 RAS
PA BT AE AY EAR A Sy Re 7 f0), APL AUT ANS #131) Wit Ho
CER SAP. #3229 ET Ser. ATT BE a AS BE MEENA RRA BRB. SIRNA CHAM, ADRK JỊ #/ II] LS Re RE. ERE SE, Boi (RPE BRA . ME OT RE. BIMGS SEEN SY ALFA. GAY |] AE ey A HE I Ey, TT TR HS A IR EE
FARR. Alc, f7: HA. ft: VLE RSE. BONE INE PAE ERAS Fl a, FER CA AK, WRETE AE AE ie
Sab. WE hr A BE A He mg AE HE RI SEA —. Bũ3í HIRAM ART RIE, BORE ERR AL VLE RSET TERE A .
Alc, FREER RR SAR ERR AR, AEE ERE TG
3, Beit AE At I RR ALF 2 RS
ilf, đ&ỉf2{/58Êđ1, EDK RS A RE 340933 3t Ren. 3xPJf#£U, YE VLE RAD, HEB MFO RAIA
bE), ANE BN ea A Ee
SEAR, VLE RACHA AP HVMARES THM. SoA
KPA £ #112 AK Ae CE VLE BCP EE 328
SAREE. BUY Hy BAMA EE AER ET MAKE, ll ALE TEER SI RE RES S| AR EAE EA. AUC. BUM AN THE FAB 40#Lit6E, RABE, Date Ee RTE WHR AF 2] I.
ii], SEE AS YL Hg 1 Me A SES EAN PE AE A, Di REE VLE RSP IEA AR. ROW RABE. HS) ANTEC IAF ESS. TE A He AEE AE) WR AE.
112
PPR DK DNS A LA BO EEE 2 ROR IS, LRAT OAR i EKER EAE MARIE ANG. BOT ASCH LAG EEE ÈE
CMRI A, JFMEfkWfIWVS, CIÍEDU(BIJ3EĐU4-AÍM2E21MU8.
UGA AIT OL CA CIARA, BIR VLE RBECE A429: VARA TH OTE FAD EAS EAT ôSSSR SR ER EF >)
SRM, RANT DL ASI eS SEs OIL BE A ER TR,
APART RES TUR.
LE LSU. JRUUBUMEMELCVIARUHĐ, DUE AMAR SE SEAN GSR, BATT AY WL A tH ESL RE AA ME 2
lý, GEESE RR MET
42.2. BK
PAA ES, VLE ASCE SUR ie A ME. &
HERA CERRS VLE RSME ERO AORN, FARR BERR DORI ABH.
AR WISTZE SR. FRA Hl — TP ee, HTIff 2: VLE RRP INF ARR. PH AT 193 #5 A RY AR A BE RY PAA RRA ED. WITS, 3⁄2 AAT Ay CAE Ee 7 #{bfẽ]
fE VLE ASCARI, FRAC EE Tis HACE tet A] OR.
#Iili#li3 % PRE RA a dF ^J 42 f9 EE. A. PP PR tán] CALI BOM ES AY. ARABS. WR PRES CF IR
FNS, PBS ARSE AY ft; AR al tí 3t) LE Be AF AB Vist — A He SAE YF A] OR ASE A, Eee a BY BA ZI Sl
113
EER CHES, FP ATEN WET A EUR RAC A EU, LAE SSC RE HERE AE
Se LAIR, AE ACE Lh Fe VET RE ORE 24 HE VLE AR Bt
AIR ASE TT Bh Pe AE A Te es ƒ H CM. 3f FRB EL RY TE (1 Sa Bits HR Te FR UE PRET EE DP A Ba SR A 9
M?mfi RC ERE 2It|[ RR DAE A SAAR) AS >J 3â.
bũ 3 EAR AE) #4 PS AA. BREE 6237 ^J BR SE Seek A ahhh. AAS AE AGH HE 9 A HT Se EY SEIS, EWE TEAR RRA ROR . MATE VLE RSC AI LBS
ems, BATH 322340: HĐthbft, ALB fe AS EAC 9 4 AI AG, NTH AAT SAF Bh 2581344.
114
-f: `
pa te
CEA COED, ADRS T FACES ER AIBN, eat 2If9l41MÀ, WL A LER FI SR BE EA LSD 5
UAV. BI, ASA AL a aT PEAR ME AR DH
Asch VLE #31 BCPAE AE YF 2 OR 9 RMT RET TPE SEE T RR LUMO RMB,
BOB, RIBS AR GST HURI%/R4U
HAR. JAIU, BT ECR ORE, #2E@#3Ii#fittTfESTMIR Fa LY. PRA, AS i PE BR) RR ME
2EĐ2LIHH T —)E16/E/)223)MORIM273), LEM BITE T WP AE FAYED RAR YS BL, LE RE
AUS BCPAR.
Sek 4 th & RA PY CAR A A SL Se) SO 2D KW, 4&AJ2BUVEHMIE, ĐUDH, TRB. SORE ALG RMS MERE ORE. REREAD. 3 semyey A Ce LEARY: Dy CY RELA SURE. aL, CEU EAR OI OR tị, AA REA SSL HE, LIRR AR A GE AT
ACTION, AAT T RRL ERR REE. BAF {#-3£ÍMI3#ìIBEIMZEĐLEEAMIM/%. BRE RUE USER, DUM OR EE ìSHHERIS:HI+. ì6Ä{2#I14)ŸÍš&ÍHEHI, ACA DLR Pad TAR
ATE CER 2 PRL, 3FMEIHĐEILÍEHUPOIEIEDUBHBI6, DUR
iE ARES) MAR
SAMBA, AWE SL Ia CERF MOREA ET BPR BR ANI IK,
Fag thệ/#\fù AVA BE ET EE CARS DI NARS SIR,
115
2112600146 7 AE ASHER. E713 0! # A PR A Se ROR IE
ee NIUME. 3 EAR ACHE WS fí tố # ET 9 AI A A OD RP HO SK, SETHE ME 34090172.
AW PIE HER 2L, PME AS BR BR. PETRIE
BoA, CHE le RA EE AOR PGA) BER. eh, 8
FA) BOR PEAR EP EE A RR TG EG BEA >J WHE. ACSA A BUHL TH. DE. AKER FE BY DA ng: Mi ik HEAT TAO IT, WARE RE RES Ay HERR AF Oy) He BEE A EAA
116
[1] Hà, N. T., Anh, N. T., & Hương, L. T. (2020). Thực trạng mô hình học
tập trực tuyến đại học Sư phạm TP.HCM. Journal of Education
Development(16), 27-33.
[2] Anh, N. T., & Đức, H. M. (2020). Dao tạo trực tuyến trong các trường
đại học ở Việt Nam hiện nay: thực trang và giải pháp nâng cao chat lượng.
Tạp chí công thương, 23, 239-244.
[3] Anh, T. T. (2018). Đánh giá sự hiệu qua của việc áp dụng hệ thống VLE
trong giảng dạy và học tập tại Đại học Sư phạm TP.HCM. (Luận văn thạc sĩ, Đại học Sư phạm TP.HCM).
[4] Hương, N. T. (2019). Ap dụng hệ thong VLE trong giảng day môn Tiếng
Anh tại Đại học Sư phạm TP.HCM. Luận văn thạc sĩ, Dai học Sư phạm TP.HCM.
[5] Dương, N. T. (2020). Ứng dụng hệ thong VLE Moodle vào giảng day
mon Kinh té tai Dai hoc Su phạm TP.HCM. Luận văn thạc si, Dai học
Sư phạm TP.HCM.
[6] UA, J4, & B£‡HÍ[M. (2021). WP) OLR AE |. 3182 [M %2}
pin tr eR. “SCH AES SEE, 13(03), 46-51.
[7] SKWESR, & ALK. (2006). ASF ANE RAR. th Z7
4: Ti Z⁄0/22/(1). 100-102.
(8] xe 4, Wr MAR AK, G2: BUG, & !ýÉL7š. (2014). fa MOOC MY
{\: #ófxfr2Wtffủ9n]134:kèš. HER AWE, 20(3), 44-52.
[9] Fh FU K. (2016). MOOC HEBRIE MT 1 6/3.) 4.81200000820107 IE.
PE: #⁄ÿHl‡# 2K.
117
[10] bah, & XI CH. (2015). MOOC FA RPAM BS RN GERMANY
Sem AA. 1 #!3,EÊt#tỉ, II, 43-48.
[11] RIDER, #itt, & EAN. (2017). FERRE 38 BK
We RY AE >J ER ASEM. REACH WE, 38(2), 117-
124.
(12) BRR. (2018). ###1fù:š(lli33J17 AAS HY BO BL hl SEE
GF. 22M 02#£#{/7(10), 35,43.
[13] Iniesto, F., Rodrigo, C., & Moreira Teixeira, A. (2014).
Accessibility analysis in MOOC platforms.A case study: UNED COMA and UAb iMOOC. V Congreso Internacional sobre Calidad y Accesibilidad de la Formacion Virtual. Antigua Guatemala: Springer.
[14] Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
[15] Chen, Y., & Li, L. (2020). The influence of the asynchronous online learning model on learning effectiveness. Jn 2020 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSSE), (pp. 440-443).
[16] Martinez-Lopez, F. J., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Esteban-Millat, I.
(2019). Hybrid business models: An exploratory study of their design, innovation and strategic implications. Journal of Business Research, 99, 530-544.
[17] Li, X., & Ma, X. (2010). A review of research on the effectiveness of online learning in K-12 settings. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1-10.
118
[18] Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
[19] Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’
continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4-12.
[20] Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge.
[21] D'Mello, S., Craig, S. D., Witherspoon, A., McDaniel, B., &
Graesser, A. (2014). Predicting affective states expressed through an emote-aloud procedure from autonomic nervous systems responses and
facial features. Emotion, /4(1), 18-30.
[22] Chen, B., Li, N., & Yang, J. (2018). Self-control, metacognition, and online self-regulated learning in Chinese college students.
Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 302-310.
[23] Kim, M. K., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
[24] Zhang, L., Li, X., & Liang, J. (2021). Self-regulated learning and academic performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13.
[25] Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Chen, X. X., & Huang, Y. (. (2019). Effects of an adaptive learning system on students’ learning styles and learning outcomes, Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(04),
1047-1066,
119
[26] Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research,
1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62.
27] Zhu, Y., Wang, L., & Wu, D. (2019). The effects of online homework on achievement and self-efficacy for elementary school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 420-437.
[28] Liu, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2020). Personalized homework system based on learning analytics and multi-criteria decision-making.
IEEE Access, 8, 118497-118508.
[29] Trautwein, U., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2009). Predicting homework effort; Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psycholagy, 101(2), 405-418.
[30] Kilicarslan, M., Gũlbahar, Y., & Rapp, C. (2016). Exploring the relationship between TPACK, teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their pedagogical beliefs towards educational use of Web 2.0 tools. /nteractive
Learning Environments, 24(8), 1981-1997.
[31] Wang, Q., Chen, L., & Liang, Y. (2017). The effects of teacher guidance on students’ learning performance in e-learning environments:
A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1). 244-256.
[32] Shin, W. S., & Lee, J. (2015). The impact of information technology on the relationship between teacher feedback and students’
satisfaction in online learning environments. Computers & Education,
8], 221-231.
[33] Ozdal, M. (2020). Effects of an online learning platform on student engagement and academic performance in a Turkish university.
Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 77-95.
120
[34] Al-Rawajfah, & M., O. (2020). The impact of teacher support and student motivation on e-learning effectiveness in higher education during the coronavirus crisis. Education Sciences, 10(9), 233.
[35] Zhang, C., Sun, C., & Chen, X. (2019). Online courses quality evaluation model based on BP neural network. JEEE Access, 7, 171626-
171633.
[36] Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2019).
Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 40, 54- 60.
[37] Katz, I., Assor, A., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2019). When parents and teachers pressure, support, or neglect students’ need for autonomy:
The consequences for students’ motivation and engagement. Learning and Instruction, 60, 117-128.
[38] Tuckman, B. W., & Kennedy, G. J. (2011). The effect of teacher immediacy and clarity on perceptions of classroom interaction dimensions and student learning. Communication Education, 60(4), 426- 441.
[39] Gutiérrez, Í., & Marquez, C. (2021). Timing is Everything:
Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a Flexible Learning Model during COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(6), 3136.
[40] Gao, T. T., & Zhang, K. (2019). The effectiveness of interactive online learning: A meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. Educational Research Review, 27, 180-189.
[41] Wang, Q., Chen, L., Liang, Y., Huang, X., & Liu, Q. (2019). The effectiveness of computer-based personalized education: A meta- analysis. Educational Research Review, 27, 198-215.
121
(42] Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, C. M. (2019). The effects of interactive e-learning contents on learning outcomes and satisfaction of college students: A test of mediation effects. Education and Information
Technologies, 24(5), 3095-3113.
[43] Zhang, S., Zhao, J., Chen, Y., Chen, X., Yang, Y., & Cheng, G.
(2018). A personalized e-learning approach to improving the learning performance of engineering students. Computers & Education, 123, 121-
133.
[44] Lin, C. F. (2019). Content first, technology second: Technology- enhanced language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1-2), 1-5.
[45] Qin, Z. L., Huang, L., & Chen, N. (2020). Course difficulty and student performance in online learning: Evidence from a Chinese undergraduate course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 1-17.
[46] Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2018).
Instructional video difficulty: Effects on students” satisfaction, interest, and challenge perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research,
56(2), 272-290.
[47] Xu, H., Liu, S., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2021). Investigating students’
online learning engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural equation modeling analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 126, 1-9.
[48] Kouros, C. D., Pruitt, N. T., Ekas, N. V., Kassinove, H., & Gibbs, B. (2014). Prospective relations between bullying, peer victimization, and aggression in middle childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(8), 1311-1322.
122
[49] Zhang, Y., Li, S., & Sun, S. (2019). The impact of parental involvement on children's learning motivation and academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1826.
[50] Huang, R., & Chen, G. (2019). Parental involvement and adolescents’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2339-2351.
[51] Dumais, S. A., Long, M. C., & Blaich, C. (2019). How much difference does the professor make? Evidence of the impact of instructor effectiveness on student achievement. Journal of Higher Education,
90(1), 1-26.
[52] Lin, Q. (2019), The relationship between parental involvement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 26, 149-162.
[53] Xu, J., & Du, J. (2017). Understanding online social comparison effect on self-esteem in a collectivistic culture: The roles of offline self- esteem and perceived online social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 171-181.
[54] Huang, R., Liu, D., Tlili, A., Yang, J, & Wang, H. (2020).
Handbook on Facilitating Flexible Learning During Educational Disruption: The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in COVID-19 Outbreak. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 317.
[55] Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of learning management systems: A case study from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Education and Information
Technologies, 25(6), 5397-5418.
123
[56] Shen, Y., Huang, R., & Liu, D. (2019). Study on Countermeasures of Online Learning Distractions. Modern Education Technology, 29(1 1).
23-29,
[57] Wang, X., Liu, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2021). A Review on Research of Online Learning Distractions in the Era of COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 31-44.
[58] Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Bakia, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.
[59] Bernard, R. M., Borokhovskt, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., &
Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied.
Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122.
[60] Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K.
(2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of
Education.
[61] Park, Y. J., & Jo, I. H. (2015). The effects of online learning on students' course outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational
Technology Development and Exchange, 8(11), 1-14.
[62] Chen, P. S., & Lin, J. W. (2014). The effects of online remedial instruction on students’ learning outcomes: A _ meta-analysis.
Educational Research Review, 11, 26-40.
[63] Nguyen, T. L., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Applying the Moodle system in teaching at Open University of Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 6(1), 13-22.
124
[64] Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27-38.
[65] Nguyen, T. P. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of Moodle system application at Open University of Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Science and Technology in Education Research and Development
Center, 1 1(2), 62-72.
[66] Le, T. H. (2019). The application of Moodle system in teaching English for students of Law Faculty at Open University of Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Foreign Languages and Literature, 4(1), 23-30.
[67] Binh, N. T., Hường, V. T., Lan, N. T., & Thuy, K. P. (n.d.). Ren luyện kĩ năng nghiệp vụ sư phạm trong đào tại giáo viên. Ha Nội: Nhà
xuất bản Đại học Sư phạm.
[68] Shahzad, S., & al., e. (2021). Analyzing the role of teacher- centered and student-centered approaches in online education during COVID-19. Information Technology & People, 34(3), 875-892.
[69] Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating the engagement and effectiveness of feedback modes in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 154, 103901.
[70] Bao, Y. H., & Lai, J. (2019). The effects of formative feedback on learning achievement, self-regulation, and motivation among secondary school students in mainland China. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,2217.
[71] Wang, X., Zhou, L., Huang, T., Wei, H., & Zhang, J. (2021). The
effectiveness of practical courses in cultivating engineering students’
professional abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 33, 100365.
125
2 Huang, R., & Liu, D. (2020). Impact of internet quality on online learning effectiveness: Evidence from longitudinal study. Education Sciences, 10(11), 317.
126
fa 3.
l3.
3.
R13.
J3.
l3.
A 3.
R13.
2.
3.
l3.
R13.
J3.
fd 3.
la.
Ba.
3.
2.
l3.
Ba.
R13.
3.
3.
la.
pin ỚN"ớớớ "Cố. TT 44
210 BE TT AD sssssseisssssssswscsasasasasenssssecasasatasavasssasssasataravavaiesaserscasasacatasatss 45
in. 0n. ... 45 ee 46 SMUG aasnsnanntiiniinidistiiiistgiti11010101G11318101636133113381333381808161885433896183836358 46 6 PEE 8P ...,.ÔỎ 47 7 URS TBR nh ẽ... . -:ỀẰÔÔA...ÔỎ 47 Si BE HIUERNGERIINGsiseeeeeeeeeeaooaoaaoooaoooooe 48 9:6 NIIEHTEBÍIieooaioaoioioiioiiiiosiiniiniioiinitiiiii4050011110303060103001336181508364 48
WD Ee Pet 1H... (ga... 49
ee 49 L2 qaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaraayaagaarangnainnsingdiiistianiiaiaissa 50
2S (2. ae 50
Wabi STi ME ascezecscesscscecscscosscesesceeseszcucsescecscuscesceessscesseesecseessescnssessnsseusees 51
DS WBF con. ie as ccescnavanesarsssssnessnasessrorevsessavssassreressrarsnsnsasecnerarnresness 5]
(1|: tờ 0 ớớớnớaố ốớớa. . ae 52
17 TRS TH RNA BD caoeoeoaoaoaiaoaiaaaaaaaaaaonaoaoao 53
I0 RE geeaeiaaaaoaoanapoiooaaaoaooiiioodiiiatiiiang 54
1c mm... ... 55 DOP 2 LÍ TIẾP Ecce cace sce sacessesresceasszcsnosnasaresssesssassseresarassscessersvaremnsersnss 56 21 HCMOUILMS 2 ggaaaaaaaaaaeanaarrioanranntitiirtnnatiinsran 58
22 CIM W NAS RE TEEN css sasasnsasscesosasssnsscscnsavasesnsavssatnsssnzasnons 58 23) HC MOU LMS) X11 TÍN sscssssssssasssasascsssscssssssssasstasesssssscasosasasessess 59
24 cLearming@HCMuS ...cscsescssecssseessesssscesseesssesesscesssecesecesncesssecesecs 60
I 3. 25 eLearming@HCMUS Jif H 2†Z42†ffù...-..- 61
3. 26 eLearning@HCMUS J lfi7t H #fIli...-.- -5-5+Sc<cscex 61 PERILS 27 NI DAS =e ip Be ớớợảớớ an 62
3.28 NTT LMS 93 AN BEET .cesssscsssescsssescsssesssssessssscesssccssnscessnessssneesssnes 63 BEl5,29IUPHDMS SE TT ccicicnnnnnnnnnnniananannnnianannnn 64 TRU St se 64
BI 4. 1 YEW TEESE He ấ(18hBf4:9 Sấf.,...eceee 68 PA 4. 2 WCU PEAE IB ZE VLE GG L-3⁄21VÊŸZ... 69 ll 4.3 BSA CRMC VLE RAR ASA i FRY Be WA csasesanazanszaiaseeassussansessensessssssossnssensnsnssnsasavasonaeatesarausrsteanrenermtesien: 70
El 4. 4 #BỊ#&*JH: # RUSE HE VLE ABER 3J Bxt BS
Bh 2): ga eeeagoinnoitiiriitiitiitiigtSi8i50618300518301812851838010288088 72
4.5 BSA RM K45 3 ?t:ft: VLE RBC a ASN Fe RRS Od 34
4 ớớ... ớa 74
El 4.6 H ARRAY K46 EAE TE VLE ABE AEH PAIR E1 REE >J X4 2) NẢNớớớớaaaaaốaố ớố ớớớớớ nan na CC 75 4.7 Hi DRA K47 4 HE VLE RBC A dN K RES >J 34 L2. ...)).).).)H,HẬậẬH,)),....,ÔỎ 77
FA 4. § PUPS FEM RY Pe AISA HE VLE AABCUE A AF 2J ak RE RE
= et bi): ee 79
FA 4.9 SAA K44 271: HE VLE RBH AE BR PG RE 2
"n1 ... 81
l4. 10 SpA K45 ACE CE VLE RSVR AHA HA PSR 3)
TOMES :cocigis:st:ng55:5:50501131505161126505162625635361618535361618559536583835865618558588361883588385 83
128
Fl 4. 11 #4] BEM K46 3?t:#: VLE ABE SAR FP SL SS Bae i bas cuconcanssacavazapsvacssasasavansnneanasesavavansuacssasaiavasssasanavasusassnseaessaasaieessseanenes 85
l4. 12 BAA K47 AACE VLE RBH AA AN Be RR >) MEG banainoaoniinoiioanoiiinoiiniiigiiii0013103004)313313405)5138336)815859646)6185 86 E1 4. 13 GEAR Ae RAE HE VLE RGRAY EERE
Ly 6 re 88
A 4. 14 RESTART K44 PEE VLE 3i #3 tt FR 31
TT... a7 an cố 0 0000000 90
1 4. 15 URAL K45 AAR CE VLE ASR AHS Bi FREES 2)
ee 9]
l4. 16 RRA K46 AEE VLE #9? ASS HAR FRY a
` suas usc sesavacussasuoescousavarcvsseseossasetesaicustusoousssuneasiausvssesereuuieustassosieotsisrenssereess 93 4. 17 RELA K4? AEE VLE RSH ASA PAN FRESE A
PORE —...,ÔỎ 94
El 4. 18 1Z#4B]#xJrh x RUNGE TE VLE RSS isk RR NT ggaanrearobnoiniirtiniiniiititttitatitiiiI011381503118318108812085888181818053918883 96 E14. 19 ARR K44 EAE YE VLE ASE RF RSE 31
FIRE ...ÔỎ 98