“Hotel Mumbai” and “Ash Is Purest White.”
BY ANTHONY LANE
ILLUSTRATION BY GAURAB THAKALI
In 2008, a series of attacks on the In- dian city of Mumbai, launched by the Islamist militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, left more than a hundred and sixty peo- ple dead. The attacks began on Novem- ber 26th and lasted until the 29th. Many locations were targeted around the city, including a hospital and a Jewish com- munity center, but the most well-pub-
licized assault—though not the most lethal—took place at the Taj Mahal Pal- ace Hotel, commonly known as the Taj.
Throughout the operation, the mili- tants, numbering only ten, remained in contact with their handlers, who were based in Pakistan. One message, which two of the killers were told to read out, ran as follows: “This is just a trailer. The real film is yet to come.”
What kind of feature presentation Lashkar-e-Taiba has in mind, one shud- ders to think. For the moment, though, we have “Hotel Mumbai,” directed by Anthony Maras, which wastes no time in gunning the story to life. We join the young terrorists as they crouch in a rub- ber boat, skimming across the sea. Each of them has an earpiece, through which
they hear the edicts of their leader, who is referred to as the Bull, and whom we never see. “God is with you. Paradise awaits you,” he tells the militants. As an augury of such bliss, the water around them shines like melting gold. They reach the city’s shore and split up, bound for their various objectives. In the toi- lets of a railroad station, two of the guys
unload guns from their backpacks. As they leave the toilets and start shooting, the camera stays put, resisting the temp- tation to pursue them and see what havoc they wreak. The rest of the film is sel- dom so restrained.
With so much mayhem to choose from, why should Maras and his co- screenwriter, John Collee, focus on the Taj? Lurking below the movie is an un- savory irony: the killers and the film- makers picked the hotel for the same reasons. First, because it is a contained space in which to shoot. Second—and there’s no getting around this—because it holds plenty of Westerners, whose value, whether as real-life hostages or as dramatis personae, is there to be ex- ploited. Third, because the Taj is a fount
of opulence, designed to woo you, what- ever the purpose of your visit. The ter- rorists gawk at the sight of the lobby, but so does David (Armie Hammer), an American architect who comes to stay, with his wife, Zahra (Nazanin Bo- niadi), their baby, and their British nanny.
To be fair, Maras and Collee are all too conscious of this cultural slant, and they make a sterling effort to correct it.
Hence the introduction of a Sikh waiter named Arjun (Dev Patel). He drops his daughter off with his pregnant wife, who is at work, and steers his scooter through teeming streets to the Taj. Soon afterward, just in case we’ve missed the contrast in living standards, we are offered a closeup of a thermometer being dipped into the milky water of a bath that has already been run, and strewn with rose petals, ahead of a guest’s ar- rival at the hotel. I was half expecting a slogan to flash onscreen: “Feeling Guilty Yet?” Later, when a horde of terrified guests seek refuge near the top of the building with the loyal Arjun as their protector, one aging white lady com- plains about his turban. Only a wild sur- mise, but I think she’s a racist.
Some of the actors play real people.
Anupam Kher, for instance, who was excellent as the therapist in “Silver Lin- ings Playbook” (2012), brings a compa- rable calm to his portrayal of Hemant Oberoi, the Taj’s head chef, who bore himself courageously during the siege.
According to the end credits, however, some of the others who were trapped there have been “subsumed fictionally,”
which sounds painful. David and Zahra are products of the subsumption, and so is Vasili ( Jason Isaacs), a rich Rus- sian misogynist for whom it is difficult to root. It transpires that he has had Special Forces training, and what’s in- teresting is how little that avails him—
or anyone else—in his hour of need, and how exasperated you feel, as a movie- goer, by his lack of initiative. He must have seen “Die Hard” (1988), so what the hell is he waiting for?
“Hotel Mumbai” belongs to an odd postmillennial genre: the queasy and half-cathartic thriller, based on actual outrages of recent times. Other ex- amples include Peter Berg’s “Patriots Day” (2016), which investigates the bombings at the Boston Marathon, and Paul Greengrass’s “22 July” (2018), which
recounts the mass slaughter committed by Anders Behring Breivik, in Norway.
In each case, the carefully managed ten- sions of the plot invite you to be ex- cited, while the bleakness of the histor- ical facts at once dares and forbids you to enjoy yourself. The characters both do and don’t behave like folks in the movies are meant to; often, the cavalry is late showing up, or doesn’t come at all. Greengrass set the tone with “United 93” (2006), about the airplane that was hijacked on 9/11 and, thanks to intrepid passengers, fell short of its target. Is it any surprise that this disturbing brand of cinema was triggered by 9/11, a ca- tastrophe that, despite the valor it called forth, and the wars that ensued, lies be- yond redemption and revenge? Or that
“Hotel Mumbai,” a well-staged model of the form, should leave you feeling fidgety and low? You can admire a film, reel at the horrors it unfolds, and still wind up asking yourself, helplessly, what it was all for.
Firearms abound in “Hotel Mum- bai,” and they do incalculable harm, yet none have the dramatic impact that is made by a single handgun in “Ash Is Purest White.” Aimed at nothing in particular, the gun hurts nobody. It be- longs to a gangster named Bin (Fan Liao), who wields influence—though less than he believes—in the northern Chinese city of Datong. We know he’s minor league because of a scene in a night club, where he dances with Qiao (Zhao Tao), who is not his moll so much as his partner in crime. The year is 2001, although it might as well be 1978, given the cheesy lighting and the fact that ev- eryone’s going nuts to “Y.M.C.A.” Half-
way through the song, there’s a clatter, and Bin’s gun falls to the floor, amid the revellers. Qiao gives him a short, hard stare, fully loaded with scorn. Looks can kill, even when guns don’t.
“Ash Is Purest White” is directed by Jia Zhangke, who specializes in small, involved tales that somehow unscroll into broader truths, often of the most withering sort, about his native land. A century and a half ago, and thousands of miles away, the same gift was be- stowed on Émile Zola; I can picture the novelist watching, with solemn approval, the start of the new film, in which the camera inspects a busload of passen- gers—young and old, smoking and yawning—and finally alights on Qiao.
In “Still Life” (2006), Jia used a similar procedure, locating his hero only after surveying the crowded deck of a ferry.
In each case, we sense an entire society both summoning and deserving the at- tention of the artist, who can reach out, more or less at random, and pluck a story worth telling.
Qiao, not Bin, dominates the latest film. It is her fortunes that we follow, and her deeds that set the course of the plot. When Bin is cornered by thugs and beaten up, she takes his gun—there it is again—and fires into the air to make them stop. Charged with pos- sessing an illegal weapon, she refuses to snitch, and serves five years in jail.
Upon her release, she goes hunting for him, in a distant province, only to be rejected. Later still, we find her back in Datong, clearly wielding some power in criminal circles, yet content to care for Bin, a much diminished figure, when he appears. Why? She strikes me as a free and stubborn spirit. Asked to ex-
plain her attitude, she says, “We talk about righteousness.”
Fans of Jia will feel at home in this movie, resounding as it does with echoes of its precursors. The three-part span of the narrative is as wide as that traversed by “Mountains May Depart” (2015).
Nothing was more unexpected, in “Still Life,” than the glow of a passing U.F.O., which made for a charming break in Jia’s visual sobriety, and the same thing happens here, to miraculous effect. On a more concrete level, the changes that we witness in Datong, like the looming promise, or threat, of the vast Three Gorges Dam, on the Yangtze River, reflect an enduring obsession with all that fails to endure. Do not be gulled by the slow pace of Jia’s stories; they are ceaselessly alive to his country’s haste, as it rushes to erase and to construct, and his sympathies tilt to those uncer- tain souls who simply can’t keep up.
Above all, there is Zhao Tao. Trained as a dancer, she has been the leading lady in many of Jia’s films, starting with “Plat- form” (2000), and his wife since 2012.
Theirs may be the most fruitful part- nership between a director and a spouse (can we please abandon the rusty and constricting notion of the muse?) since Roberto Rossellini joined forces with Ingrid Bergman. All that we treasure in Jia is there in Zhao’s scrutinizing gaze, at once pointed and guarded, and in the fierce patience with which she deliber- ates before taking action. Near the end of the film, Qiao even smashes a teapot over someone’s head. In her world, pre- sumably, that means war.
THE NEW YORKER IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC. COPYRIGHT ©2019 CONDÉ NAST. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE U.S.A.
VOLUME XCV, NO. 5, March 25, 2019. THE NEW YORKER (ISSN 0028792X) is published weekly (except for five combined issues: February 18 & 25, June 10 & 17, July 8 & 15, August 5 & 12, and December 23 & 30) by Condé Nast, which is a division of Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. PRINCIPAL OFFICE: Condé Nast, 1 World Trade Center, New York, NY 10007. Chris Mitchell, chief business officer; Risa Aronson, vice-president, revenue; James Guilfoyle, executive director of finance and business operations; Fabio Bertoni, general counsel. Condé Nast: Robert A. Sauerberg, Jr., president & chief executive officer; David E. Geithner, chief financial officer; Pamela Drucker Mann, chief revenue and marketing officer. Periodicals postage paid at New York, NY, and at additional mailing offices. Canadian Goods and Services Tax Registration No. 123242885-RT0001.
POSTMASTER: SEND ADDRESS CHANGES TO THE NEW YORKER, P.O. Box 37684, Boone, IA 50037 0684. FOR SUBSCRIPTIONS, ADDRESS CHANGES, ADJUSTMENTS, OR BACK ISSUE INQUIRIES: Please write to The New Yorker, P.O. Box 37684, Boone, IA 50037 0684, call (800) 825-2510, or e-mail subscriptions@newyorker.com. Please give both new and old addresses as printed on most recent label. Subscribers: If the Post Office alerts us that your magazine is undeliverable, we have no further obligation unless we receive a corrected address within one year. If during your subscription term or up to one year after the magazine becomes undeliverable, you are ever dissatisfied with your subscription, let us know. You will receive a full refund on all unmailed issues. First copy of new subscription will be mailed within four weeks after receipt of order. For advertising inquiries, please call Risa Aronson at (212) 286-4068. For submission guidelines, please refer to our Web site, www.newyorker.com. Address all editorial, business, and production correspondence to The New Yorker, 1 World Trade Center, New York, NY 10007. For cover reprints, please call (800) 897-8666, or e-mail covers@cartoonbank.com. For permissions and reprint requests, please call (212) 630-5656 or fax requests to (212) 630-5883. No part of this periodical may be reproduced without the consent of The New Yorker. The New Yorker’s name and logo, and the various titles and headings herein, are trademarks of Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. Visit us online at www.newyorker.com. To sub- scribe to other Condé Nast magazines, visit www.condenast.com. Occasionally, we make our subscriber list available to carefully screened companies that offer products and services that we believe would interest our readers. If you do not want to receive these offers and/or information, please advise us at P.O. Box 37684, Boone, IA 50037 0684 or call (800) 825-2510.
THE NEW YORKER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RETURN OR LOSS OF, OR FOR DAMAGE OR ANY OTHER INJURY TO, UNSOLICITED MANUSCRIPTS, UNSOLICITED ART WORK (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAWINGS, PHOTOGRAPHS, AND TRANSPARENCIES), OR ANY OTHER UNSOLICITED MATERIALS. THOSE SUBMITTING MANUSCRIPTS, PHOTOGRAPHS, ART WORK, OR OTHER MATERIALS FOR CONSIDERATION SHOULD NOT SEND ORIGINALS, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED TO DO SO BY THE NEW YORKER IN WRITING.
NEWYORKER.COM
Richard Brody blogs about movies.
Each week, we provide a cartoon in need of a caption. You, the reader, submit a caption, we choose three finalists, and you vote for your favorite. Caption submissions for this week’s cartoon, by Frank Cotham, must be received by Sunday, March 24th. The finalists in the March 11th contest appear below. We will
announce the winner, and the finalists in this week’s contest, in the April 8th issue. Anyone age thirteen or older can enter or vote. To do so, and to read the complete rules, visit contest.newyorker.com.
“Any chance you could turn down the ceiling fan?”
Dave Millar, El Cerrito, Calif.
“ You know what? Just bring me back the one with the fly in it.”
Matthew Thill, South Pasadena, Calif.
“Before you go, describe the iceberg salad.”
Adam Santiago, New York City
“I wish we’d seen that before we ate Dave.”
Zak Snoderly, Boise, Idaho CARTOON CAPTION CONTEST
THE WINNING CAPTION THIS WEEK’S CONTEST
THE FINALISTS
“
. . . .
”