In light of the study findings, the researcher also gives a recommendation for other studies.
First, further studies can be carried out to conduct a longitudinal study that follows students’ willingness to communicate over an extended period with the incorporation of MI-based lessons. This could give a deep insight into the sustained impact of these activities on learners’ WTC and how it evolves.
Second, apart from speaking skills, research regarding MI activities on learners’ WTC could be conducted across various skills, including reading, listening, and writing or specific language components such as vocabulary or grammar. Further research on these aspects could offer a comprehensive understanding of WTC in diverse contexts.
Third, it is also advisable to investigate the effectiveness of MI based-activities in developing other speaking sub-skills such as intonation and word stress.
Next, it is recommended that MI-based activities should be carried out with students of other cohorts, such as mature or teenage students to examine the variability of WTC across diverse age groups.
Last but not least, activities developed on other types of intelligences, such as bodily- kinesthetic, spatial, naturalistic or linguistic could be studied to investigate their impact on learners’ WTC.
74
REFERENCES
Abdallah, M. M. S. (2005). The Effect of Using a Multiple Intelligences-Based Training Programme on Developing English Majors' Oral Communication Skills. Online Submission.
Adityas, M. T. (2016). Activating Students’ Multiple Intelligences in Speaking Activities.
Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES), 3(1), 70-75.
Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences: Seven ways to approach curriculum. Educational leadership, 52(3), 26-28.
Armstrong, T. (2003). The multiple intelligences of reading and writing: Making the words come alive. ASCD.
Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Ascd.
Al Hosni, S. (2014). Speaking difficulties encountered by young EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(6), 22-30.
Alikhani, M., & Bagheridoust, E. (2017). The Effect of Group Dynamics-Oriented Instruction on Developing Iranian EFL Learners' Speaking Ability and Willingness to Communicate.
English Language Teaching, 10(11), 44-59.
Amin, M. M., & Saadatmanesh, S. (2018). On the relationship between EFL learners’ multiple intelligences and their willingness to communicate. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 5(2).
Akkakoson, S. (2016). Speaking anxiety in english conversation classrooms among Thai students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 63-82.
Bailey, K. M., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: speaking.
Başửz, T., & Erten, I. (2018). Investigating tertiary level EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in English. English Language Teaching, 11, 78–87.
Burnkart, G. S. (1998). Spoken language: What it is and how to teach it. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics
Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness‐to‐communicate scale: Development and validation.
Communications Monographs, 43(1), 60-69.
75
Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Campbell, B. (1992). Multiple intelligences in action. Childhood Education, 197-201.
Cameron, D. (2013). Willingness to communicate in English as a second language as a stable trait or context-influenced variable: Case studies of Iranian migrants to New Zealand.
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 177-196.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493.
Cao, Y. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. Tesol Quarterly, 48(4), 789-814.
Chan, C. S. (2021). University graduates’ transition into the workplace: How they learn to use English for work and cope with language-related challenges. System, 100, 102530.
Cetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students' willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
Chalak, A., & Kassaian, Z. (2010). Motivation And Attitudes Of Iranian Undergraduate EFL Students Towards Learning English. GEMA online journal of language studies, 10(2).
Cha, J. S., & Kim, T. Y. (2013). Effects of English-learning motivation and language anxiety of the elementary school students on willingness to communicate in English and English speaking. Primary English Education, 19(1), 271-294.
Chu, H. N. R. (2008). Shyness and EFL learning in Taiwan: A study of shy and non-shy college students' use of strategies, foreign language anxiety, motivation, and willingness to communicate. The University of Texas at Austin.
Charos, C. (1994). Personality and individual differences as predictors of second language communication: A causal analysis. Unpublished Honors Thesis, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within a second language classroom from an ecological perspective. System, 39, 468–479.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
76
de Saint Léger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269-285.
Debbie, C., & Christine, E. (2007). Teaching speaking and listening: A toolkit for practitioners.
Crown Press.
Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6. (No Title).
Dửrnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dửrnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited (1st ed.).
Routledge.
Dửrnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language teaching research, 4(3), 275-300.
Eddy-U, M. (2015). Motivation for participation or non-participation in group tasks: A dynamic systems model of task-situated willingness to communicate. System, 50, 43-55.
Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140-147.
Farahani, A. A. K., & Abdollahi, Z. (2018). Incorporating humor to develop EFL learner's speaking ability and willingness to communicate. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 205-211.
Finocchiaro, M., & Brumfit, C. (1983). The functional-notional approach: From theory to practice. Oxford University Press, 200 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016.
Fatima, I., Malik Mohamed Ismail, S.A., Pathan, Z.H., & Memon, U. (2020). The power of openness to experience, extraversion, L2 self-confidence, classroom environment in predicting L2 willingness to communicate. International Journal of Instruction, 13, 909–924.
Fauziah, N. I. L. A. (2015). The use of multiple intelligences model to improve students’
speaking skills in discussion texts. English Language Education Faculty, Walisongo State Islamic University Semarang, Indonesia.
77
Finocchiaro, M., & Brumfit, C. (1983). The functional-notional approach: From theory to practice. Oxford University Press, 200 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016.
Fonseca-Mora, C., Toscano-Fuentes, C., & Wermke, K. (2011). Melodies that help: The relation between language aptitude and musical intelligence. International Journal of English Studies, 22(1), 101-118.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: A Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books/Hachette Book Group.
Gardner, H., Howard, V., & Perkins, D. (1974). Symbol systems: A philosophical, psychological, and educational investigation. Teachers College Record, 75(5), 27-55.
Gardner, H., & Wolf, D. (1983). Waves and streams of symbolization: Notes on the development of symbolic capacities in young children. In The acquisition of symbolic skills (pp. 19-42). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G.H., & Asadpour, S.F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian Non–English major university students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 197–211.
Goh, C. C., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29-70.
Hart, J. W., Stasson, M. F., Mahoney, J. M., & Story, P. (2007). The Big Five and achievement motivation: Exploring the relationship between personality and a two-factor model of motivation. Individual Differences Research, 5(4).
Hawa, S., Suryani, S., Susiani, R., Dauyah, E., & Majid, A. H. (2021). University students’
perception toward the use of the mother tongue in the EFL classrooms. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 1094-1110.
Hitchcock, G. & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the Teacher (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Ibrahim, S. E. (2020). Using Multiple Intelligences-Based Activities to Develop Speaking
78
Skills of Prep Stage Students and their Self-Efficacy. Journal of The Faculty of Education- Mansoura University, 111.
Jondeya, R. S. (2011). The effectiveness of using information gap on developing speaking skills for the eighth graders in Gaza Governorate schools. Unpublished Dissertation. Gaza: Al-Azhar University.
Jung, U. O. H. (1995). Retrospective review article: Speaking-The second skill. System, 23(1), 107-112.
Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.
Kamdideh, Z., & Barjesteh, H. (2019). The Effect of Extended Wait-Time on Promoting Iranian EFL Learners' Willingness to Communicate. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 183-200.
Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. Tesol Quarterly, 50(1), 154-180.
Komarraju, M., & Karau, S. J. (2005). The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and individual differences, 39(3), 557-567.
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and individual differences, 51(4), 472-477.
Kruk, M. (2021). Changes in self-perceived willingness to communicate during visits to Second Life: a case study. The Language Learning Journal, 49(2), 240-250.
Lee, G. (2009). Speaking up: Six Korean students’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 142-156.
Lee, J. S. (2019). EFL students’ views of willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 692-712.
Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2020). Role of L2 motivational self-system on willingness to communicate of Korean EFL university and secondary students. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 49(1), 147-161.
79
Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63-73.
Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Affective variables and informal digital learning of English:
Keys to willingness to communicate in a second language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 168-182.
MacIntyre, P. D., Clộment, R., Dửrnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The modern language journal, 82(4), 545-562.
MacIntyre, P.D., Baker, S., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support and language learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369–388.
MacIntyre, P.D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91, 564–576.
MacIntyre, P. (2020). Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 111-131.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied linguistics, 32(2), 149-171.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control.
System, 38(2), 161-171.
Maji, E., Samanhudi, U., & Mokoagouw, M. E. (2022). Students’_ difficulties in speaking English:(a case study in SMKN 3 Sorong). Soscied, 5(1), 95-109.
Marzban, A. A., & Mahmoudvand, M. (2013). The impact of doing problem-solving tasks on willingness to communicate, self-perceived communication competence, and communication apprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 6(13), 125-145.
Matsuoka, R., Matsumoto, K., Poole, G., & Matsuoka, M. (2014). Japanese University Students' Willingness to Communicate in English: The Serendipitous Effect of Oral Presentations. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 193-218.
80
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement.
Mesgarshahr, A., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2014). The impact of teaching communication strategies on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 51-76.
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2016). Dynamics of classroom WTC: Results of a semester study.
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 651-676.
Mohammadzadeh, A., & Jafarigohar, M. (2012). The Relationship between Willingness to Communicate and Multiple Intelligences among Learners of English as a Foreign Language.
English Language Teaching, 5(7), 25-32.
McKenzie, W. (1999). Multiple Intelligences Survey Retrieved from http://surfaquarium.com/MI/MIinvent.htm.
McKenzie, W. (2005). Multiple intelligences and instructional technology. ISTE (Interntl Soc Tech Educ.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook.
(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL quarterly, 25(2), 279-295.
Nisbet, J. and Watt, J. 1984. Case Study. In J.Bell, T. Bush, A.Fox, J.Goodey and S.Goulding (eds) Conducting small-scale investigations in Educational Management. London: Harper.
Nagy, B., & Nikolov, M. (2007). A qualitative inquiry into Hungarian English majors’
willingness to communicate in English: Classroom perspectives. Uprt, 16(3), 149-168.
Oz, H. (2014). Big five personality traits and willingness to communicate among foreign language learners in Turkey. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 1473–1482.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.
Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 654-671.
81
Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1-9.
Peng, J. E. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203-213.
Peng, J. E., Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2017). The mediation of multimodal affordances on willingness to communicate in the English as a foreign language classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 51(2), 302-331.
Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language learning, 60(4), 834-876.
Piaget, J. (1962). The relation of affectivity to intelligence in the mental development of the child. Bulletin of the Menninger clinic, 26(3), 129.
Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2018). Openness to experience as a predictor of L2 WTC. System, 72, 190–200.
Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1-9.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (p. 204).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking (Vol. 35, No. 4). Cambridge:
Cambridge university press.
Riasati, M. J. (2012). EFL learners’ perception of factors influencing willingness to speak English in language classrooms: A qualitative study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(10), 1287-1297.
Riasati, M. J. (2018). Willingness to speak English among foreign language learners: A causal model. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1455332.
Rizqiningsih, S., & Hadi, M. S. (2019). Multiple Intelligences (MI) on Developing Speaking Skills. English Language in Focus (ELIF), 1(2), 127-136.
Robson, F. M. (2002). ‘Yes!—A chance to tell my side of the story’: a case study of a male partner of a woman undergoing termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality. Journal of health psychology, 7(2), 183-193.
82
Salem, A. A. (2013). The impact of multiple intelligences-based instruction on developing speaking skills of the pre-service teachers of English. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 53- 66.
Shamsudin, M., Othman, M., Jahedi, M., & Aralas, D. (2017). Enhancing English Learners' Willingness to Communicate through Debate and Philosophy Inquiry Discussion. English Language Teaching, 10(8), 145-152.
Sheybani, M. (2019). The relationship between EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate (WTC) and their teacher immediacy attributes: A structural equation modelling. Cogent Psychology, 6, 1–14.
Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students' speaking abilities. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 12(1), 204-211.
Sun, Y. F. (2008). Motivation to speak: Perception and attitude of non-English major students in Taiwan (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University).
Sturman, A. (1997). Case study methods. Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook, 61-66.
Trianto, M. P. (2011). Desain pengembangan pembelajaran tematik: Bagi anak usia dini.
Prenada Media.
Talley, P. C., & Hui-Ling, T. (2014). Implicit and explicit teaching of English speaking in the EFL classroom. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(6), 38-45.
Thornbury, S. (2006). How to teach speaking. Longman.
Uztosun, M. S., Skinner, N., & Cadorath, J. (2018). An action research study into the role of student negotiation in enhancing perceived student engagement during English speaking classes at university level in Turkey. Educational Action Research, 26(1), 106-126.
Walters, J., & Gardner, H. (1985). The development and education of intelligences. In F.Link (Ed.), Essays on the intellect (pp. 1-21). Washington, DC: Curriculum Development Associates.
Wolf, J. P. (2013). Exploring and contrasting EFL learners’ perceptions of textbook-assigned and self-selected discussion topics. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 49-66.
83
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 54–66.
Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In Dӧrnyei, Z., & E. Ushioda (Eds.). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 144– 163).
Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54, 119–152.
Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 115–137.
Yu, M. (2009). Willingness to communicate of foreign language learners in a Chinese setting.
The Florida State University.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners' willingness to communicate. System, 42, 288-295.
Zhong, Q. M. (2013). Understanding Chinese learners' willingness to communicate in a New Zealand ESL classroom: A multiple case study drawing on the theory of planned behavior.
System, 41(3), 740-751.
Zarrinabadi, N., & Tanbakooei, N. (2016). Willingness to communicate: Rise, development, and some future directions. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(1), 30-45.
I
APPENDIX 1: THE MI SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES SURVEY (ENGLISH VERSION)
Dear Students,
This survey aims to identify your Multiple Intelligences profile. It is very important that you answer all the questions sincerely. Your identity and individual responses will be kept confidential, and the findings of the survey will be used only for research purposes.
Thank you for your participation and cooperation.
Put a check (√) next to each statement you feel accurately describes you. If you do not identify with a statement, leave the space provided blank.
1. _____ I enjoy categorizing things by common traits 2. _____ Ecological issues are important to me
3. _____ Classification helps me make sense of new data 4. _____ I enjoy working in a garden
5. _____ I believe preserving our National Parks is important 6. _____ Putting things in hierarchies makes sense to me 7. _____ Animals are important in my life
8. _____ My home has a recycling system in place
9. _____ I enjoy studying biology, botany and/or zoology 10. _____ I pick up on subtle differences in meaning 11. _____ I easily pick up on patterns
12. _____ I focus in on noise and sounds
II 13. _____ Moving to a beat is easy for me 14. _____ I enjoy making music
15. _____ I respond to the cadence of poetry
16. _____ I remember things by putting them in a rhyme
17. _____ Concentration is difficult for me if there is background noise 18. _____ Listening to sounds in nature can be very relaxing
19. _____ Musicals are more engaging to me than dramatic plays 20. _____ Remembering song lyrics is easy for me
21. _____ I am known for being neat and orderly 22. _____ Step-by-step directions are a big help 23. _____ Problem solving comes easily to me
24. _____ I get easily frustrated with disorganized people 25. _____ I can complete calculations quickly in my head 26. _____ Logic puzzles are fun
27. _____ I can't begin an assignment until I have all my "ducks in a row"
28. _____ Structure is a good thing
29. _____ I enjoy troubleshooting something that isn't working properly 30. _____ Things have to make sense to me or I am dissatisfied
31. _____ I learn best interacting with others
32. _____ I enjoy informal chat and serious discussion 33. _____ The more the merrier
34. _____ I often serve as a leader among peers and colleagues 35. _____ I value relationships more than ideas or accomplishments 36. _____ Study groups are very productive for me
37. _____ I am a “team player”
38. _____ Friends are important to me
39. _____ I belong to more than three clubs or organizations 40. _____ I dislike working alone
41. _____ I learn by doing
III 42. _____ I enjoy making things with my hands 43. _____ Sports are a part of my life
44. _____ I use gestures and non-verbal cues when I communicate 45. _____ Demonstrating is better than explaining
46. _____ I love to dance
47. _____ I like working with tools
48. _____ Inactivity can make me more tired than being very busy 49. _____ Hands-on activities are fun
50. _____ I live an active lifestyle
51. _____ Foreign languages interest me
52. _____ I enjoy reading books, magazines and web sites 53. _____ I keep a journal
54. _____ Word puzzles like crosswords or jumbles are enjoyable 55. _____ Taking notes helps me remember and understand 56. _____ I faithfully contact friends through letters and/or e-mail 57. _____ It is easy for me to explain my ideas to others
58. _____ I write for pleasure
59. _____ Puns, anagrams and spoonerisms are fun
60. _____ I enjoy public speaking and participating in debates 61. _____ My attitude affects how I learn
62. _____ I like to be involved in causes that help others 63. _____ I am keenly aware of my moral beliefs
64. _____ I learn best when I have an emotional attachment to the subject 65. _____ Fairness is important to me
66. _____ Social justice issues interest me
67. _____ Working alone can be just as productive as working in a group 68. _____ I need to know why I should do something before I agree to do it 69. _____ When I believe in something I give more effort towards it
70. _____ I am willing to protest or sign a petition to right a wrong
IV
71. _____ Rearranging a room and redecorating are fun for me 72. _____ I enjoy creating my own works of art
73. _____ I remember better using graphic organizers 74. _____ I enjoy all kinds of entertainment media
75. _____ Charts, graphs and tables help me interpret data
76. _____ A music video can make me more interested in a song 77. _____ I can recall things as mental pictures
78. _____ I am good at reading maps and blueprints 79. _____ Three-dimensional puzzles are fun
80. _____ I can visualize ideas in my mind
KHẢO SÁT VỀ ĐA TRÍ TUỆ (BẢN TIẾNG VIỆT)
Gửi các bạn học sinh,
Bản khảo sát này nhằm mục đích xác định loại thông minh của các em. Để đảm bảo tính chính xác của kết quả, cô mong các em sẽ trả lời các câu hỏi dưới đây một cách thành thật. Danh tính và câu trả lời cá nhân của các em sẽ được bảo mật hoàn toàn, kết quả của cuộc khảo sát này cũng sẽ chỉ dành cho mục đích nghiên cứu.
Cảm ơn các em vì đã tham gia và hợp tác.
Hãy đánh dấu (√) vào những câu các em cảm thấy phù hợp với bản thân. Nếu câu nào không đúng về mình các em có thể bỏ trống.
1. _____Tôi thích phân loại mọi thứ dựa theo đặc điểm 2. _____Các vấn đề sinh thái quan trọng với tôi
3. _____Việc phân loại giúp tôi hiểu các thông tin mới 4. _____Tôi thích chăm sóc vườn cây
5. _____Tôi tin rằng việc bảo tồn các công viên quốc gia là quan trọng 6. _____Tôi cảm thấy việc sắp xếp mọi thứ theo cấp bậc là hợp lý 7. _____Động vật quan trọng đối với tôi