SUMMARY AND FUTURE RESEARCH

Một phần của tài liệu Essays on asean trade and foreign direct investment (Trang 94 - 117)

Most ASEAN members are low-income countries, so attracting FDI is one of the key policies of these countries as well as a common strategic objective of ASEAN. This dissertation focuses on some concerns of the policymakers in these countries, namely the change in the level of export concentration and the determinants of trade and FDI in ASEAN. By the empirical results introduced in Chapters 2 to 4, we review briefly some of the main findings.

In Chapter 2, we calculate and use the Theil index and its components to show the change in ASEAN export concentration. First, the ASEAN export concentration decreased over time, and the within-group component contributed more to the total concentration. Second, by separating the whole sample into several sets of subgroups, we find that with the absolute Theil indices, the export concentration across countries in either the high-income or the non-high-income subgroup, was quite stable and the gap in import value from ASEAN between the two subgroups was small. We also find that the high-income countries played a key role in the volatility of the level of the ASEAN export concentration in Africa. However, in America, the non-high-income group played a more important role. The empirical results also show that the export concentration among the ASEAN members was decreasing gradually during the sample period.

In Chapter 3, we examine the spatial effects of FDI and trade on FDI inflow to the ASEAN countries by applying SDM and DSDM. The negative impacts of FDI inflow and the positive impact of export in the neighbor country on ASEAN’s FDI are confirmed. These effects are also confirmed inversely for the one-period lagged variables.

In Chapter 4, we investigate the impacts of COVID-19 on the ASEAN export by applying the DID method. The results confirm the significant negative impacts of COVID-19 on the ASEAN

84

export and show the significant impacts from both supply and demand sides. The increase in the number of new confirmed cases in the ASEAN countries as well as in the number of deaths in the ASEAN partners lowers the export value.

This dissertation attempts to fill the gap in the literature related to ASEAN trade and the relationship between trade and FDI. However, the dissertation still has some limitations. First, the methodology used in Chapter 2 focuses on how to measure the Theil indices and how to trace the export concentration level by using this index and its decomposition. This study does not offer in- depth analysis to point out the factors that cause the changes in the level of ASEAN export concentration. In the forthcoming research, I will try to improve the paper by applying a suitable model to figure out the determinants of the ASEAN export concentration. Second, in Chapter 4, we can see the different results when we deal with the aggregated level data and country-level data.

Although the significant results for the whole sample that combines data from ten ASEAN members are found, for each individual country, the significant impacts are only shown in a few countries. Some results in Table 4.6 showing the positive impacts for the individual country might be explained by unobserved factors. In the forthcoming research, I will try to figure out other variables like lock-down policy in each country to have a clear explanation for this.

Regarding further research, based on this dissertation, I may consider the new topics noteworthy in the area of ASEAN international trade. In reality, international trade is more complicated, not only exporting the final products abroad. Traditional international trade accounts for approximately 30% of all trade in goods and services compared with the new approach, namely global value chains (GVCs) that account for 70%. It involves complex interactions among a variety of domestic and foreign suppliers when exporting from one country to another country. So, applying the GVCs approach might provide more insightful results.

85

REFERENCES

Abate, G. D. (2016), “On the link between volatility and growth: A spatial econometrics approach,”

Spatial Economic Analysis, 11, 27-45.

Aditya, A. and Acharyya, R. (2013), “Export diversification, composition, and economic growth:

Evidence from cross-country analysis,” Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 22, 959-992.

Akadiri, A. C., Gungor, H., Akadiri, S. S. and Bamidele‐Sadiq, M. (2020), “Is the causal relation between foreign direct investment, trade, and economic growth complement or substitute?

The case of African countries,” Journal of Public Affairs, 20, e2023.

Akita, T., Lukman, R. A. and Yamada, Y. (1999), “Inequality in the distribution of household expenditures in Indonesia: A Theil decomposition analysis,” Developing Economies, 37, 197-221.

Amidi, S. and Majidi, A. F. (2020), “Geographic proximity, trade and economic growth: A spatial econometrics approach,” Annals of GIS, 26, 49-63.

Amurgo-Pacheco, A. and Pierola, M. D. (2008), “Patterns of export diversification in developing countries: Intensive and extensive margins,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4473.

Anselin, L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Kluwer Academic Publishers:

Boston, London.

Anselin, L. (1995), “Local indicators of spatial association-LISA,” Geographical Analysis, 27, 93- 115.

Anselin, L. (2010), “Thirty years of spatial econometrics,” Papers in Regional Science, 89, 3-25.

ASEAN (2013), FDI Development and Regional Value Chains, ASEAN Secretariat: Jakarta.

86

ASEAN (2017), Celebrating ASEAN: 50 Years of Evolution and Progress, ASEAN Statistics Division: Jakarta.

ASEAN (2019), ASEAN Investment Report 2019: FDI in Services: Focus on Health Care, ASEAN Secretariat: Jakarta.

ASEAN (2020), “Economic impact of COVID-19 outbreak on ASEAN,”

https://asean.org/book/1st-asean-policy-brief-economic-impact-of-covid-19-outbreak-on- asean/.

Baldwin, R. and Weder di Mauro, B. (2020), Economics in the Time of COVID-19: A New eBook, CEPR Press: London.

Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P. and Pfaffermayr, M. (2007), “Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 140, 260-281.

Barro, R. and Lee, J.-W. (2013), “A new dataset of educational attainment in the world, 1950- 2010,” Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184-198.

Basile, R. (2008), “Regional economic growth in Europe: A semiparametric spatial dependence approach,” Papers in Regional Science, 87, 527-544.

Beckman, J., Gopinath, M. and Daugherty, K. (2021), “Options for ASEAN trade expansion:

Within, plus three or six, European Union or the United States?” World Economy, 44, 1177- 1204.

Beh, L.-S. and Lin, W. L. (2021), “Impact of COVID-19 on ASEAN tourism industry,” Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15, 300-320.

Belloti, F., Hughes, G. and Mortari, A. P. (2017), “Spatial panel-data model using Stata,” Stata Journal, 17, 139-180.

87

Bende‐Nabende, A., Ford, J. and Slater, J. (2001), “FDI, regional economic integration and endogenous growth: Some evidence from southeast Asia,” Pacific Economic Review, 6, 383- 399.

Benos, N., Karagiannis, S. and Karkalakos, S. (2015), “Proximity and growth spillovers in European regions: The role of geographical, economic and technological linkages,” Journal of Macroeconomics, 43, 124-139.

Besedes, T. and Prusa, T. J. (2011), “The role of extensive and intensive margins and export growth,” Journal of Development Economics, 96, 371-79.

Bickenbach, F., Liu, W. H. and Nunnenkamp, P. (2015), “Regional concentration of FDI in post- reform India: A district-level analysis,” Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 24, 660-695.

Bickenbach, F., Liu, W. H. and Nunnenkamp, P. (2018), “How global is FDI? Evidence from the analysis of Theil indices,” Empirical Economics, 55, 1603-1635.

Bickenbach, F., Mbelu, A. and Nunnenkamp P. (2019), “Is foreign aid concentrated increasingly on needy and deserving recipient countries? An analysis of Theil indices, 1995–2015,” World Development, 115, 1-16.

Blonigen, B., David, R., Waddel, G. and Naughton, H. T. (2007), “FDI in space: Spatial autoregressive relationship in foreign direct investment,” European Economic Review, 51, 1303-1325.

Bourguignon, F. (1979), “Decomposable income inequality measures,” Econometrica, 47, 901- 920.

Brenton, P. and Newfarmer, R. (2007), “Watching more than the discovery channel: export cycles and diversification in development,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4302.

88

Bun, M. J. G., Klaassen, F. J. G. M. and Tan, G. K. R. (2009), “Free trade and intra-regional trade:

the case of ASEAN,” Singapore Economic Review, 54, 319-334.

Cadot, O., Carrère, C. and Strauss-Kahn, V. (2011), “Export diversification: What’s behind the hump?” Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 590-605.

Cadot, O., Carrère, C. and Strauss-Kahn, V. (2013), “Trade diversification, income, and growth:

What do we know?” Journal of Economic Survey, 27, 790-812.

Chen, K. P., Yang, J. C. and Yang, T. T. (2022), “JUE Insight: Demand for transportation and spatial pattern of economic activity during the pandemic,” Journal of Urban Economics, 127, 103426.

Chiappini, R. (2016), “Do overseas investments create or replace trade? New insights from a macro-sectoral study on Japan,” Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25, 403-425.

Chirathivat, S. (2002), “ASEAN-China Free Trade Area: Background, implications and future development,” Journal of Asian Economics, 13, 671-686.

Chong, T. T. L., Li, X. and Yip, C. (2021), “The impact of COVID-19 on ASEAN,” Economic and Political Studies, 9, 166-185.

Chou, K. H., Chen, C. H. and Mai, C. C. (2011), “The impact of third-country effects and economic integration on China's outward FDI,” Economic Modelling, 28, 2154-2163.

Cliff, A. D. and Ord, J. K. (1970), “Spatial autocorrelation: a review of existing and new measures with applications,” Economic Geography, 46, 269-292.

Conceicao, P. and Galbraith, J. K. (2000), “Constructing long and dense time-series of inequality using the Theil index,” Eastern Economic Journal, 26, 61-75.

Coughlin, C. C. and Segev, E. (2000), “Location determinants of new foreign‐owned manufacturing plants,” Journal of Regional Science, 40, 323-351.

89

de Lucio, J., Mínguez, R., Minondo, A. and Requena, F. (2022), “Impact of COVID-19 containment measures on trade,” International Review of Economics & Finance, 80, 766- 778.

Devadason E. S. (2010), “ASEAN-China trade flows: Moving forward with ACFTA,” Journal of Contemporary China, 19, 653-674.

Dinh, T. S., Nguyen, P. C. and Schinckus, C. (2019), “Impact of foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic institutions on growth in emerging countries: The case of Vietnam,”

Journal of International Studies, 12, 243-264.

Driffield, N. (2006), “On the search for spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI) with spatial dependency,” Regional Studies, 40, 107-119.

Duro, J. A. and Esteban, J. (1998), “Factor decomposition of cross-country income inequality, 1960–1990,” Economics Letters, 60, 269-275.

Elhorst, J. P. (2014), Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels, Springer:

Dordrecht, London.

Evenett, S. and Venables, A. (2002), “Export growth in developing countries: market entry and bilateral flow,” University of Bern Working Paper.

Evenett, S., Fiorini, M., Fritz, J., Hoekman, B., Lukaszuk, P., Rocha, N., Ruta, M., Santi, F. and Shingal, A. (2022), “Trade policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from a new data set,” World Economy, 45, 342-364

Ezcurra, R. and Rios, V. (2020), “Quality of government in European regions: Do spatial spillovers matter?” Regional Studies, 54, 1032-1042.

Fischer, M. M. and Griffith, D. A. (2008), “Modelling spatial autocorrelation in spatial interaction data: An application to patent citation data in the European Union,” Regional Science, 48, 969-989.

90

George, A., Li, C., Lim, J. Z. and Xie, T. (2021), “From SARS to COVID-19: The evolving role of China-ASEAN production network,” Economic Modelling, 101, 105510.

Guan, D., Wang, D., Hallegatte, S., Davis, S. J., Huo, J., Li, S., Bai, Y., Lei, T., Xue, Q., Coffman, D., Cheng, D., Chen, P., Liang, X., Xu, P., Lu, X., Wang, S., Hubacek, K. and Gong, P.

(2020), “Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures,” Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 577-587.

Gutiérrez‐Portilla, P., Maza, A. and Villaverde, J. (2018), “Has the crisis affected Spanish investment strategy abroad? A spatial panel data approach,” World Economy, 42, 1032-1056.

Gutiérrez‐Portilla, P., Maza, A. and Villaverde, J. (2019), “Spatial linkages in FDI location:

Evidence from the Spanish regions,” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 110, 395-411.

Haddad, M., Lim, J. J., Pancaro, C. and Saborowski, C. (2013), “Trade openness reduces growth volatility when countries are well diversified,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 46, 765-790.

Hattari, R., Rajan, R. S. and Thangavelu, S. (2014), “Intra-ASEAN FDI flows and the role of China and India: Trends and determinants,” in Cavoli, T., Listokin, S. and Rajan, R. S. (2014), Issues in Governance, Growth and Globalization in Asia, pp.69-88, World Scientific Publishing: Singapore.

Hayakawa, K. and Mukunoki, H. (2021), “Impacts of COVID‐19 on global value chains,”

Developing Economies, 59, 154-177.

Helpman, E., Melitz, M. and Rubinstein, Y. (2008), “Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441-487.

Hinlo, J. E. and Arranguez, G. I. S. (2017), “Export geographical diversification and economic growth among ASEAN countries,” Munich Personal RePEc Archive, No. 81333.

91

Ho, C.-Y., Wang, W. and Yu, J. (2013), “Growth spillover through trade: A spatial dynamic panel data approach,” Economics Letters, 120, 450-453.

Hoang, H. H. and Bui, D. H. (2015), “Determinants of foreign direct investment in ASEAN: A panel approach,” Management Science Letters, 5, 213-222.

Hoang, H. H. and Goujon, M. (2019), “Determinants of intra-region and extra-region foreign direct investment inflow in ASEAN: A spatial econometric analysis,” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 12, 965-982.

Hoang, T. T. N., Truong, Q. H. and Dong, V. C. (2020), “Determinants of trade between Taiwan and ASEAN countries: A PPML estimator approach,” SAGE Open, April-June 2020, 1-13.

Hortas-Rico, M. and Rios, V. (2020), “Is there an optimal size for local governments? A spatial panel data model approach,” Regional Studies, 54, 958-973.

Hummels, D. and Klenow, P. J. (2005), “The variety and quality of a nation’s exports,” American Economic Review, 95, 704-723.

Imbs, J. and Wacziarg, R. (2003), “Stages of diversification,” American Economic Review, 93, 63- 86.

IMF (2020), “IMF makes available $50 billion to help address coronaviruss,”

https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2020/03/04/sp030420-imf-makes-available-50- billion-to-help-address-coronavirus.

Ismail, N. W. (2009), “The determinant of foreign direct investment in ASEAN: A semi-gravity approach,” Transition Studies Review, 16, 710-722.

Kien, N. T. (2009), “Gravity model by panel data approach: An empirical application with implications for the ASEAN Free Trade Area,” ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26, 266-277.

92

Kim, J. U. (2020), “Technology diffusion, absorptive capacity, and income convergence for Asian developing countries: A dynamic spatial panel approach,” Empirical Economics, 59, 569- 598.

Kojima, K. (1975), “International trade and foreign investment: Substitutes or complements,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 16, 1-12.

Koren, M. and Tenreyro, S. (2007), “Volatility and development,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 243-287.

Kueh, J. S.-H., Puah, C.-H., Lau, E. and Mansor, S. A. (2007), “FDI-trade nexus: Empirical analysis on ASEAN-5,” Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper, No. 5220.

Lee, D. and Zhang, H. (2019), “Export diversification in low-income countries and small states:

Do country size and income level matter?” International Monetary Fund Working Paper 2019.118.

Lee. H. H. and Tan, H. B. (2006), “Technology transfer, FDI and economic growth in the ASEAN region,” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 11, 394-410.

Lindberg, L. and Alvstam, C. (2007), “The national element in regional trade agreements: The role of Southeast Asian countries in ASEAN-EU Trade,” ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 24, 267-275.

Liu, X., Ornelas, E. and Shi, H. (2021), “The trade impact of the COVID-19 pandemic,” CEsifo Working Paper, No. 9109.

Maliszewska, M., Mattoo, A. and van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2020), “The potential impact of COVID-19 on GDP and trade: A preliminary assessment,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 9211.

Markusen, J. R. and Venables, A. J. (1998), “Multinational firms and the new trade theory,” Journal of International Economics, 46, 183-203.

93

Martínez, V., Bengoa, M. and Sánchez-Robles, B. (2012), “Foreign direct investment and trade:

Complements or substitutes? Empirical evidence for the European Union,”

https://www.scirp.org/html/6-9900134_19393.htm

Masron, T. A. and Nor, E. (2013), “FDI in ASEAN-8: Does institutional quality matter?” Applied Economics Letters, 20, 186-189.

Masron, T. A. and Yusop, Z. (2012), “The ASEAN investment area, other FDI initiatives, and intra-ASEAN foreign direct investment,” Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 26, 88-103.

Meilak, C. (2008), “Measuring export concentration: The implications for small states,” Bank of Valletta Review, 37, 35-48.

Noureen, S., Mahmood, Z. and Sector, H. (2016), “Explaining trends and factors affecting export diversification in ASEAN and SAARC regions: An empirical analysis,” NUST Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2, 1-28.

OECD (2020), “Coronavirus: The world economy at risk, OECD interim economic assessment,”

https://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/.

Poelhekke, S. and Van der Ploeg, F. (2009), “Foreign direct investment and urban concentrations:

Unbundling spatial lags,” Journal of Regional Science, 49, 749-775.

Ramasamy, B. (1995), “Trade diversion in an ASEAN Free Trade Area,” ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 12, 10-17.

Regelink, M. and Elhorst, J. (2015), “The spatial econometrics of FDI and third-country effects,”

Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 8, 1-13.

Reis, J. G. and Taglioni, D. (2013), “Determinants of export growth at the extensive and intensive margins: evidence from product and firm-level data for Pakistan,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6341.

94

Rose, A., Walmsley, T. and Wei, D. (2021), “Spatial transmission of the economic impacts of COVID-19 through international trade,” Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 14, 169- 196.

Schiff, M. W. (1999), Will the Real “Natural Trading Partner” Please Stand Up? World Bank Publications.

Sharma, S. C. and Chua, S. Y. (2000), “ASEAN: Economic integration and intra-regional trade,” Applied Economics Letters, 7, 165-169.

Siah, K. L., Choong, C. K. and Yusop, Z. (2009), “AFTA and the intra-trade patterns among ASEAN-5 economies: Trade-enhancing or trade-inhibiting?” International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1, 117-126.

Stojčić, N. and Orlić, E. (2020), “Spatial dependence, foreign investment and productivity spillovers in new EU member states,” Regional Studies, 54, 1057-1068.

Tan, B. W. and Tang, C. F. (2016), “Examining the causal linkages among domestic investment, FDI, trade, interest rate and economic growth in ASEAN-5 countries,” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6, 214-220.

Thomsen, S. (1999), “Southeast Asia: The role of foreign direct investment policies in development,” OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 1999/01.

Thornton, J. and Goglio, A. (2002), “Regional bias and intra-regional trade in southeast Asia,” Applied Economics Letters, 9, 205-208.

Truong, Q. H., Dong, V. C. and Nguyen, H. H. (2019), “Determinants of trade flows and trade structure between Korea and ASEAN,” East Asian Economic Review, 23, 55-88.

Uttama, N. P. (2012), “Some new evidence on intra-industry trade and complex FDI in ASEAN countries: A spatial panel approach,” International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 4, 116-131.

95

Uttama, N. P. and Peridy, N. (2009), “The impact of regional integration and third-country effects on FDI: Evidence from ASEAN,” ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26, 239-252.

Vahalík, B. (2014), “Regional bilateral trade analysis of the European Union, China and ASEAN,”

Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 709-717.

Verschuur, J., Koks, E. E. and Hall, J. W. (2021), “Observed impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on global trade,” Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 305-307.

Wong, J. and Chan, S. (2003), “China-ASEAN free trade agreement: Shaping future economic relations,” Asian Survey, 43, 507-526.

WTO (2020), “Trade set to plunge as COVID-19 pandemic upends global economy,”

https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres20_e/pr855_e.htm.

96

APPENDIX

Share of population Share of GDP per capita Share of GDP

Figure A1 Comparison of different weights between two subgroups separated by income

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Between All Within

H-W NH-W

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Between All Within

H-W NH-W

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Between All Within

H-W NH-W

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

H NH

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

H NH

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

H NH

97

Share of population Share of GDP per capita Share of GDP

Figure A2 Comparison of different weights among four subgroups separated by regions

0 0.5 1 1.5

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between All

AP-W AF-W EU-W

AM-W

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between All

AP-W AF-W EU-W

AM-W

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between All

AP-W AF-W EU-W

AM-W

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

AP AF EU AM

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

AP AF EU AM

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

AP AF EU AM

98

Share of population Share of GDP per capita Share of GDP

Figure A3 Comparison of different weights among eight subgroups separated by regions and income

0 0.5 1 1.5

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between All

AP-L-W AP-H-W AF-L-W

AF-H-W EU-L-W EU-H-W

AM-L-W AM-H-W

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between All

AP-L-W AP-H-W AF-L-W

AF-H-W EU-L-W EU-H-W

AM-L-W AM-H-W

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between

All AP-L-W

AP-H-W AF-L-W

AF-H-W EU-L-W

EU-H-W AM-L-W

AM-H-W

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

AP-L AP-H AF-L AF-H

EU-L EU-H AM-L AM-H

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

AP-L AP-H AF-L AF-H

EU-L EU-H AM-L AM-H

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

AP-L AP-H AF-L AF-H

EU-L EU-H AM-L AM-H

99

Share of population Share of GDP per capita Share of GDP

Figure A4 Comparison of different weights between ASEAN and non-ASEAN subgroups

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between

All ASEAN-W

N-ASEAN-W

0 0.5 1 1.5

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between

All ASEAN-W

N-ASEAN-W

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Within Between

All ASEAN-W

N-ASEAN-W

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

ASEAN Non-ASEAN

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

ASEAN Non-ASEAN

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

ASEAN Non-ASEAN

100

Figure A5 Decomposition among four subgroups separated by regions, excluding China

101

Figure A6 Decomposition among eight subgroups separated by regions and income, excluding China

102

Figure A7 Decomposition between ASEAN and non-ASEAN subgroups, excluding China

103

Table A1 ASEAN export value to different subgroups

Total ASEAN export value

High-income (54 countries)

Non-high-income (107 countries)

Asia and Pacific (40 countries)

Africa (55 countries)

Europe (35 countries)

America (31 countries)

2004 5.25×1011 3.45×1011 1.8×1011 3.55×1011 1.50×1010 6.34×1010 9.13×1010

2005 6.06×1011 3.9×1011 2.16×1011 4.13×1011 1.89×1010 6.94×1010 1.05×1011

2006 7.07×1011 4.45×1011 2.62×1011 4.81×1011 3.10×1010 8.25×1010 1.13×1011

2007 8.32×1011 5.12×1011 3.2×1011 5.53×1011 3.73×1010 1.14×1011 1.28×1011

2008 9.06×1011 5.36×1011 3.7×1011 6.4×1011 3.75×1010 1.00×1011 1.28×1011

2009 7.87×1011 4.68×1011 3.19×1011 5.39×1011 4.17×1010 1.00×1011 1.06×1011

2010 1.04×1012 6.09×1011 4.35×1011 7.3×1011 5.24×1010 1.28×1011 1.33×1011

2011 1.23×1012 6.92×1011 5.41×1011 8.75×1011 6.45×1010 1.45×1011 1.48×1011

2012 1.25×1012 7.01×1011 5.49×1011 8.92×1011 6.64×1010 1.4×1011 1.51×1011

2013 1.27×1012 6.98×1011 5.71×1011 9.06×1011 6.89×1010 1.36×1011 1.58×1011

2014 1.29×1012 7.23×1011 5.63×1011 9.05×1011 7.23×1010 1.43×1011 1.65×1011

2015 1.16×1012 6.61×1011 5.03×1011 7.99×1011 6.29×1010 1.38×1011 1.65×1011

2016 1.15×1012 6.6×1011 4.87×1011 7.76×1011 5.30×1010 1.49×1011 1.69×1011

2017 1.32×1012 7.38×1011 5.81×1011 9.04×1011 5.73×1010 1.73×1011 1.85×1011

2018 1.43×1012 7.95×1011 6.33×1011 9.92×1011 5.86×1010 1.73×1011 2.04×1011

Source: Author’s calculations

104

Table A2 List of economies by region

Asia and Pacific America Europe Africa

Afghanistan Papua New Guinea Antigua and Barbuda Bermuda (H) Albania Algeria Malta (H)

Australia (H) Philippines Argentina Canada (H) Austria (H) Angola Mauritania

Bangladesh Samoa Aruba (H) United states (H) Belarus Bahrain (H) Mauritius

Bhutan Singapore (H) Bahamas (H) Belgium (H) Benin Morocco

Brunei Darussalam (H) Solomon Islands Bolivia Bulgaria Cameroon Mozambique

Cambodia Sri Lanka Brazil Croatia (H) Cape-Verde Namibia

China Taiwan (H) Chile Cyprus (H) Chad Niger

Fiji Thailand Colombia Czech Republic(H) Comoros Nigeria

French Polynesia (H) Turkey Costa Rica Denmark (H) Congo Oman (H)

Hong Kong (H) Uzbekistan Cuba Estonia (H) Djibouti Qatar (H)

India Vanuatu Dominican Rep. Finland (H) Egypt Saudi Arabia (H)

Indonesia Vietnam Ecuador France (H) Ethiopia Senegal

Japan (H) El Salvador Georgia Gabon Seychelles

Kazakhstan Guatemala Germany (H) Ghana Sierra Leone

Korea, Dem. People's Rep. of Guyana Greece (H) Guinea Somalia

Korea, Republic of (H) Honduras Greenland (H) Guinea-Bissau South Africa

Lao PDR Jamaica Hungary (H) Iran, Islamic Rep. of Sudan

Macao (H) Mexico Iceland (H) Iraq Swaziland

Malaysia Nicaragua Ireland (H) Israel (H) Syrian Arab Republic

Maldives Panama Italy (H) Jordan Tanzania, United Rep.of

Marshall Islands Paraguay Europe Latvia Kenya Togo

Mongolia Peru Slovakia (H) Lithuania Kuwait (H) Tunisia

Myanmar Puerto Rico (H) Slovenia (H) Luxembourg (H) Lebanon Uganda

Nepal St Vincent and the Grenadines Spain (H) Netherlands (H) Liberia United Arab Emirates (H)

New Caledonia (H) Suriname Sweden (H) Norway (H) Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Yemen

New Zealand (H) Trinidad and Tobago (H) Switzerland (H) Poland (H) Madagascar Zambia

Northern Mariana Islands Uruguay Ukraine Portugal (H) Malawi Zimbabwe

Pakistan Venezuela United Kingdom (H) Russian Federation Mali

Source: WDI regional classification adjusted by continental classification

Một phần của tài liệu Essays on asean trade and foreign direct investment (Trang 94 - 117)

Tải bản đầy đủ (PDF)

(117 trang)