Hạn chế của nghiên cứu và hướng nghiên cứu tiếp theo

Một phần của tài liệu BÁO CÁO TỔNG KẾT ĐỀ TÀI NCKH : SỰ PHÙ HỢP GIỮA TÍNH CÁCH CHỦ ĐỘNG CỦA NHÂN VIÊN VÀ MÔ HÌNH MỞ ĐỔI MỚI TẠI CÁC CÔNG TY DƯỢC TẠI Tp. HCM (Trang 31 - 70)

Chương 4 KẾT LUẬN VÀ KIẾN NGHỊ

4.3 Hạn chế của nghiên cứu và hướng nghiên cứu tiếp theo

Vì mọi nghiên cứu đều có một số hạn chế, nghiên cứu này cũng khơng ngoại lệ. Bởi vì dữ liệu đã được thu thập từ một nguồn, tức là tự quản lý câu hỏi, nó có thể dẫn đến sai lệch phương pháp phổ biến. Vì lý do này, chúng tơi đã chấp nhận một số thống kê (kiểm tra yếu tố đơn) và các biện pháp thủ tục (trộn các câu hỏi của quy mô khác nhau) để tránh sai lệch phương pháp chung (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003). Do đó, nó khơng phải là vấn đề chính trong nghiên cứu của chúng tơi.

Tiếp theo, nghiên cứu hiện tại là nghiên cứu cắt ngang nên việc thiết lập mối quan hệ nhân quả giữa các biến số nghiên cứu còn hạn chế. Tương lai các nhà nghiên cứu có thể khắc phục giới hạn này bằng cách áp dụng thiết kế nghiên cứu theo chiều dọc bằng cách thu thập dữ liệu tại các thời điểm khác nhau để tổng quát hơn về kết quả.

Một hạn chế khác của nghiên cứu là chỉ các yếu tố cấp độ cá nhân đã được thực hiện như một yếu tố dự đoán và biến trung gian. Nghiên cứu tiếp theo có thể được thực hiện với một hỗn hợp thích hợp của các yếu tố cấp độ cá nhân và tổ chức với IOC để có được một hiểu biết sâu sắc hơn.

Chủ nhiệm đề tài

53

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO

TIẾNG VIỆT

Diệu Minh, (2010). Sự cần thiết xây dựng chính sách đổi mới công nghệ cho các doanh nghiệp ngành công nghiệp. Nghiên cứu chính sách khoa học và công nghệ, số 17,

trang 61-72.

Đặng Thu Giang, (2010.) Kinh nghiệm một số quốc gia và vùng lãnh thổ Châu Á về thu hút và sử dụng đầu tư trực tiếp nước ngồi hướng vào nâng cao cơng nghệ trong nước.

Nghiên cứu chính sách khoa học và cơng nghệ, số 17, trang 91-100.

Nguyễn Bích Thủy, (2011). Phát triển nhân lực Khoa học và Công nghệ: Lời giải cho tăng trưởng và phát triển bền vững. Tạp chí Tiêu chuẩn đo lường chất lượng, số 4,

2/2011, tr. 20-21.

Nguyễn Việt Hịa, (2010). Chính sách đổi mới và phương thức tác động của chính sách đổi mới đối với sự phát triển khoa học và công nghệ ngành cơng nghiệp. Nghiên cứu chính sách khoa học và cơng nghệ, số 17, trang 33-49.

Phùng Xuân Nhạ, Lê Quân, (2013). Đổi mới sáng tạo của doanh nghiệp Việt Nam. Tạp chí

Khoa học ĐHQGHN, Kinh tế và Kinh doanh, Tập 29, Số 4 (2013), trang 1-11.

TIẾNG ANH

Adler, P. S., & Shenhar, A. J. (1990). Adapting Your Technological Base: The Organizational Challenge (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 979444). Rochester, NY:

Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network website: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=979444

Ahmad, A. (2013). Measuring Employee Creativity and its Impact on Organization Innovation Capability and Performance in the Banking Sector of Pakistan. World

Applied Sciences Journal, 24(7), 949–959.

https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.07.13253

Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly,

54

Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do: California Management Review. (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA). https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–

1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995

Anwar, C. M. (2017). Linkages between personality and knowledge sharing behavior in workplace: Mediating role of affective states. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 20(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2017-2-008

Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.571.14424

Awad, E. M., & Ghaziri, H. M. (2003). Knowledge Management (1st ed Edition). Upper

Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.

Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709

Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual

Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2),

103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202

Bergeron, D. M., Schroeder, T. D., & Martinez, H. A. (2014). Proactive personality at work: Seeing more to do and doing more? Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9298-5

Branzei, O., & Vertinsky, I. (2006). Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.10.002

Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–

55

Cao, Y., & Zhao, L. (2013). Analysis of patent management effects on technological innovation performance. Baltic Journal of Management, 8(3), 286–305.

https://doi.org/10.1108/BJOM-May-2012-0033

Chen, H., & Taylor, R. (2009). Exploring the impact of lean management on innovation capability. PICMET 2009 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management

of Engineering and Technology - Proceedings, 826–834.

https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5262042

Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation. In New Frontiers in Open

Innovation. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from

https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682 461.001.0001/acprof-9780199682461-chapter-1

Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. OUP Oxford.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.

Chiang, Y. H., Hsu, C. C., & Shih, H. A. (2015). Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance. Asia Pacific Journal of

Management, 32(2), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9403-y

Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N., & Menon, S. T. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1379(200011)21:7<747::AID-JOB46>3.0.CO;2-J Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: A multi-

country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(2), 107–128.

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business Press.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

de Vries, R. E., van den Hooff, B., & de Ridder, J. A. (2006). Explaining Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Team Communication Styles, Job Satisfaction, and

56

Performance Beliefs. Communication Research, 33(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205285366

Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing Career Benefits of Employee Proactive Personality: The Role of Fit with Jobs and Organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58(4), 859–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00772.x

FERRIN, D. L., & DIRKS, K. T. (2002). Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–

628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611

Frappaolo, C. (2006). Knowledge Management. Capstone Publishing.

Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6

Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still?: National innovative productivity among ‘follower’ countries, 1978-1999. Research Policy, 33(9), 1329–

1354.

Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2016). Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation: Administrative Science Quarterly. (Sage CA: Los

Angeles, CA). https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451

Gong, Y., Cheung, S.-Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J.-C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1611–1633.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380250

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623

Gourlay, S. (2001). Knowledge management and HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860121778

Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

57

Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2001). Converting global presence into global competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(2), 45–56.

https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.4614881

Gustafson, D. H., & Hundt, A. S. (1995). Findings of innovation research applied to quality management principles for health care. Health Care Management Review, 20(2), 16– 33.

Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity (p. 75). New York, NY, US: Plenum Press.

Hogan, S. J., Soutar, G., Mccoll-Kennedy, J. R., & Sweeney, J. (2011). Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development. Industrial

Marketing Management, 40, 1264–1273.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.10.002

Hon, A. H. Y., & Lui, S. S. (2016). Employee creativity and innovation in organizations: Review, integration, and future directions for hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(5), 862–885. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2014-0454

Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L., & Palmer, A. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034285

Huang, X., Hsieh, J. J. P.-A., & He, W. (2014). Expertise dissimilarity and creativity: The contingent roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 816–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036911

Hung, R. Y. Y., Lien, B. Y.-H., Yang, B., Wu, C.-M., & Kuo, Y.-M. (2011). Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. International Business Review, 20(2), 213–225.

Jackson, S. E., DeNisi, A., & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). (2003). Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage: Designing Strategies for Effective Human Resource Management (1st Edition). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Jadin, T., Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2013). Personality traits and knowledge sharing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29.

58

Jawahar, I. M., Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Rahn, D. L. (2012). Differential Effect of Inter-Role Conflict on Proactive Individual’s Experience of Burnout. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(2), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9234-

5

Kanji, G. K. (1996). Can total quality management help innovation? Total Quality Management, 7(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129650035007

Kim, T.-Y., Hon, A. H. Y., & Crant, J. M. (2009). Proactive Personality, Employee Creativity, and Newcomer Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9094-4

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. JSTOR. Retrieved from JSTOR.

Koroglu, B. A., & Eceral, T. O. (2015). Human Capital and Innovation Capacity of Firms in Defense and Aviation Industry in Ankara. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195. Retrieved from https://trid.trb.org/view/1363131

Laforet, S. (2011). A framework of organisational innovation and outcomes in SMEs.

International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(4), 380–408.

https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551111139638

Lavikka, R., Smeds, R., & Jaatinen, M. (2015). A process for building inter-organizational contextual ambidexterity. Business Process Management Journal, 21(5), 1140–1161. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2013-0153

Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(03), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427

Li, S.-L., He, W., Yam, K. C., & Long, L.-R. (2015). When and why empowering leadership increases followers’ taking charge: A multilevel examination in China.

Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3), 645–670.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9424-1

Liao, S., Fei, W.-C., & Liu, C.-T. (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183–195.

59

Liu, W., Zhang, P., Liao, J., Hao, P., & Mao, J. (2016). Abusive supervision and employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification. Management Decision, 54(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-

09-2013-0443

Liu, X., & Buck, T. (2007). Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy,

36(3), 355–366.

Martens, Y. (2011). Creative workplace: Instrumental and symbolic support for creativity.

Facilities, 29(1/2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111101331

Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In Perspectives on Individual Differences. Handbook of creativity (pp. 211–232). New York, NY, US: Plenum

Press.

Matzler, K., Grabner‐Kräuter, S., & Bidmon, S. (2008). Risk aversion and brand loyalty: The mediating role of brand trust and brand affect. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(3), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420810875070

Mooradian, T., Renzl, B., & Matzler, K. (2016). Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing: Management Learning. (Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA).

https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606073424

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373

Neely, A., & Hii, J. (1998). Innovation and Business Performance: A Literature Review. Nonaka, I., Nonaka, I. o, Ikujiro, N., Takeuchi, H., Nonaka, P. of K. I., & Takeuchi, B. P. of

M. at the I. of B. R. H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. JSTOR.

https://doi.org/10.2307/256657

Park, J., & Chae, H. (2017). Proactive Personality and Knowledge Sharing: The Contrasting Effects of Leader-Member Exchange Social Comparison (LMXSC). Knowledge Management Research, 18(4), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2017.18.4.005

60

Perlines, F. H., & Araque, B. Y. (2015). Linking Training to Organizational Performance: An Absorptive Capacity-Based View. Case Study Method in Spanish Family Businesses. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(4), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2015.1050948

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation (SSRN

Scholarly Paper No. ID 1505251). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network website: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1505251

Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2003). The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 20(8), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310493625

Rahman, Z., De Clercq, D., Wright, B. A., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2016). Explaining Employee Creativity: The Roles of Knowledge-sharing Efforts and Organizational Context. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 11671. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.39

Salerno, M. S., Gomes, L. A. de V., Silva, D. O. da, Bagno, R. B., & Freitas, S. L. T. U. (2015). Innovation processes: Which process for which project? Technovation, 35,

59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.012

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What Do Proactive People Do? A Longitudinal Model Linking Proactive Personality and Career Success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x

Sen, F. K., & Egelhoff, W. G. (2000). Innovative capabilities of a firm and the use of technical alliances. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2), 174–

183. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.846785

Shin, J., Taylor, M. S., & Seo, M.-G. (2012). Resources for Change: The Relationships of Organizational Inducements and Psychological Resilience to Employees’ Attitudes

61

and Behaviors toward Organizational Change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0325

Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm.

Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 45–62.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171106

Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537–562.

Szeto, E. (2000). Innovation capacity: Working towards a mechanism for improving innovation within aninter‐organizational network. The TQM Magazine, 12(2), 149–

158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780010318415

Tang, H. K. (1998). An integrative model of innovation in organizations. Technovation, 18(5), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00009-1

Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley. Retrieved from https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/publications/managing-innovation-integrating- technological-market-and-organiza-3

Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology,

52(3), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x

Tiwana, A., & McLean, E. R. (2005). Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 13–43.

JSTOR. Retrieved from JSTOR.

Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(1),

108–119. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902

West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (Eds.). (1992). Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological

Một phần của tài liệu BÁO CÁO TỔNG KẾT ĐỀ TÀI NCKH : SỰ PHÙ HỢP GIỮA TÍNH CÁCH CHỦ ĐỘNG CỦA NHÂN VIÊN VÀ MÔ HÌNH MỞ ĐỔI MỚI TẠI CÁC CÔNG TY DƯỢC TẠI Tp. HCM (Trang 31 - 70)

Tải bản đầy đủ (PDF)

(70 trang)