Application of artificial intelligence in screening of birth defects a scoping review

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MINISTRY OF HEALTH HANOI MEDICAL INIVERSITY HVY DO DEC APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SCREENING OF BIRTH DEFECTS: A SCOPING REVIEW GRADUATION THESIS DOCTOR OFPREVENTn E MEDICINE 2015 2021 SUPERVISOR: LE MINH GUNG, MD, PhD HA NOI •w.-,»IW 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENT would like to offer my thanks to the stall's of Hanoi Medical University School of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, as well as teachers from the Department of Epidemiology' for your guidance and support would like to express my great appreciation to all the individuals and teams below, that without them I would not be able to accomplish my graduation thesis Firstly I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Assoc.Prof Le Minh Giang for his guidance Even though he lias always been busy, he still willing to give me some of his precious time This has always been very much appreciated The second and third person that I want to say thanks to is A/Prof Nguyen Thi Trang and Ms Le Thi Minh Phuong from Department of Biomedical Genetics for your help in birth defects, especially Ms Le Till Minh Phuong lor the time you spent screening articles with me In addition, because I can always ask you about scoping review thank you Ms Nguyen Thi Hue from Center for Research and Training on Substance Abuse- HIV Last but not least I would like to give thanks to my family and close friends, for their support and encouragement throughout my study Hanoi May 2021 Do Due Iluy •w.- COMMITMENT Respectfully addressed to: Board of Hanoi Medical University Board of Preventive Medicine and Public Health School Department of Epidemiology Board of Di ssertalion Assessment My name is Do Due Huy - Student of Hanoi Medical University, course 2015 - 2021 majoring in Preventive Medicine Doctor, hereby declare that: This is a research that I conducted under the scientific guidance of Assoc.Prof Le Minh Giang Tire data and results presented in tire research are completely truthful In addition, the thesis also uses a number of comments, assessments as well as results from other authors, agencies and organizations, all with source annotations clearly stated in the references I will take full responsibility if tlrere was any fraud in the contents of my research Hanoi May 2021 Do Due Huy •w.- -TíCa: «i! 49 APPENDIX Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist SECTION ITEM PRISMA-Sc R CHECKLIST ITEM Identifv the report IS a scoping review REPORTED ON PAGE a TITLE Click here to Tide enter text ABSTRACT Structured X iummarv Provide structured stanmary thii includes (as appbcable): background objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results and conclusions that relate to the review questions objectives and Click here to enter text INTRODUCTION Rationale Describe the rationale for the review in the context of hat IS already known Explain why the review questions objectives lend themselves to a scoping renew approach Provide an expbcit statement of the questions Objectives Gick here to enter text and objectives being addressed wrth reference to then key elements (e J population Ct participants, concepts and cortext) or ctha relevara key elemerts used to ( Ij.j J.f eI conceptualize the review questions and Ct objectives METHODS and Protocol reparation Indicate whether a review protocol exists, state if and where It can be accessed (e g a Web address), and if Oick here to available protide renstranm information including the enter text r egw traucn number Ehgib&ty cnteria Specifv chara ctenstics ofthe sources of evidence used as ebgibihtv criteria (eg, Years considered, language and publication stdus), and provide a rationale ( 1 , r Information Describe all information soirees m the search (eg databases with dates of coversrr and ccruaa with Click here t sources* authors to idenuft additional sources), as weD as the enter text date the most ec ert search was executed Present the fun electronc search strategy for at least Search Selection of sources cYidcncct of Dau charting process J 10 Crttscal of 11 appraual individual 12 , enter texT State the process for selecting sources of evidence (t e , C: • k hc'l to screen ng and eligibility) included m the scopmg review r.er TXt Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e g , calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before then use and Click here t • whether data charting was done independently or in enter text dupbeate) and am processes fol confiming data from investigator I Data items , database including am brills used such that It could be ■ repeated obt suing and Last and define all vanaHei for which data “were loụghl Click he ' !.-• and any asstanphons arxl umphficabom made enter text If done provide a ratxvule for conducting a cntxal appraisal of included sources of evidence describe th? •w.- etucec to the review questions and objectives, and ccmider the cntei text DISCISSION Sumnun evidence of 19 r elevan: c to key groipi Lr natations 20 Discuss the hrntabons of the scoping review process Coixluwons 21 Provide a gtneral mterprctaticn of the results with leaped to the atview questions and objectives, as weO as Click here to N(4 r tex’ potertial irrpbcatsons and Ct next steps FVNDI.N G Funding a4 Describe sources of fw^hr.g for the included soiaces of evidence as weD as sources of finding for the scoping Click heic to review Describe the rok of the Bunders of the iCOfing enter text IWU JB1 = Joanna Bnggs msMute PRlSMA-ScR = Preferred Reporting Items lor Systematic renews ano Meta Analyses extension for Scopng Re-news * Mere scarce* of tYKfertce (see second footnote) are compieo from such as bioiiogratfuc databases soóai media platforms and Web lies t A more induvvehetoroqenoQus term mod to account for the ddforent typo* of ovMSonco or dote wurcot (e g ouanttative anaor Quantafrve researcn expert opinion and policy aments) mat may be eigeie n a scoprig review as opposed to only stuoas Thứ « not to be corfused vth rtfoffnttO) sóưres (see first footnote/ T The frameworks by Artcsoy and oManey (6) and Levac and colleagues (7) and the JBI guidance (4 5) refer to the process of data exfrac&on tfi a scopng review as data charting The prxess of systematic3ly exarnnrg research e.idence to assess ts validly results and relevance before using It to inform a dectofort This term ts used for Itwns 12 and 19 mtead of ’mk cf bias’ (which Q more appicaPe to systematic reviews of interventions) to ndude and acknowledge the vanous souces evidence mat may be used in a scopng review (e g qjarttattve arxvor quaJtabve research expert opinon and poicy document) •w.- ,Wi€A: