In conclusion, although people do need to be provided with the necessities of life, such as housing and medical care, governments also have a duty to provide their ci[r]
(1)Should governments spend money on art, when they have so many other important issues and concerns?
Spending on Art
Art is a basic human need Governments have a responsibility to spend money on art for their citizens.
Throughout the ages, man has tried to create beauty through painting, music, sculpture and other artistic expression It seems to be a basic need of humans to surround themselves with art However some people feel that government money spent on art is wasted, particularly when there are so many other demands on it This essay will examine the conflict between those who say art is important and those who feel it is a waste of money
It can be wrong for governments to spend large sums of money on art Too often, governments spend unwisely They spend money on art not because a picture is good or a museum is needed, but for political reasons Cities end up with huge statues or empty expensive buildings that are used only by a few people or the elite Another point is that the artworks are often chosen to represent social or political rather than artistic ideas The city gets yet another statue of the leader or an ugly monument to national aspirations A third point is that governments often respond to fashions, and tastes in art can change very rapidly Without careful advice an expensive collection of worthless paintings or tasteless productions can be the result
However, it would be wrong to say that governments should not spend any money at all on art Painters, musicians, and composers cannot survive without financial support Rich people or large companies finance art, but then it is often inaccessible to ordinary people Governments have a duty to make this art available to everyone However, the most important reason why governments should support the arts is because an appreciation of art is one of the things that makes life worthwhile Humans not need just shelter and food Creative people have always tried to look at things in a new way and to make the world a better place through painting, music, poetry, calligraphy, sculpture, dance, and numerous other forms of expression While art may not make us immortal, it does make the world a richer place for future generations
In conclusion, although people need to be provided with the necessities of life, such as housing and medical care, governments also have a duty to provide their citizens with something more They should make sure that they pass on beauty, ideas and expression to the next generation and make art available to all instead of being the possession of only the few I firmly believe that spending money on art is a vital part of a government's responsibility, and I am confident that my country will be able to contribute its share to the richness of the world's art and creativity
Should governments spend money on art, when they have so many other important issues and concerns?
Spending on Art
(2)Many people's lives are richer because of art - music, paintings, calligraphy, pictures, sculpture, poems and dance However, some people feel that governments should be spending money on housing, medical care, or defence, instead of on art This essay will discuss whether governments should or should not spend money on the arts
There are several reasons why governments should not finance artists First of all, artists should have to follow the same rules as the rest of the market If there is a demand for their music or sculpture, then they will be rich Secondly, politicians generally not have good taste They will waste public money on popular art or on their own preferences But the main reason why governments should minimize spending on the art world is that there are more important areas like housing, roads, hospitals, and factories which need the money first
However, it would be wrong to say that governments should not spend any money at all on art Everybody needs some beauty in their life, but not everyone can afford a Picasso or a piece of music Governments should provide money for museums or concert halls for everyone Another point is that art allows people to express themselves and this is good for society, culture and thought Thirdly, artists can be good for the economy by producing music, films, and attracting tourists
All in all, governments should prioritize their spending carefully, but they should also allocate some of their budget for art It is part of their duty to society and to future generations