Trong lĩnh vực tư pháp dân sự, công nghệ trí tuệ nhân tạo (AI) thường được ứng dụng nhằm: (1) cung cấp thông tin pháp luật cho người dân và thúc đ y sự giao tiếp giữa tòa án với người [r]
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
| Định dạng | |
|---|---|
| Số trang | 33 |
| Dung lượng | 767,86 KB |
Nội dung
Trong lĩnh vực tư pháp dân sự, công nghệ trí tuệ nhân tạo (AI) thường được ứng dụng nhằm: (1) cung cấp thông tin pháp luật cho người dân và thúc đ y sự giao tiếp giữa tòa án với người [r]
Ngày đăng: 26/01/2021, 10:34
Nguồn tham khảo
| Tài liệu tham khảo | Loại | Chi tiết | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33. Kristina Coleman, Beyond Baidoo V. Blood-Dzraku: Service of Process Through Facebook and Other Social Media Platforms Through an Indiana Lens, Indiana Law Review, Vol. 50:645, 2017 | Sách, tạp chí |
|
||
| 29. Rabeea Assy, Briggs‘ Online Courts and the Need for a Paradigm Shift, Civil Justice Quarterly (2017) 36(1) 93-108, available at:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2918750 | Link | |||
| 30. Chánh án Tòa án nhân dân tối cao Nguyễn Hòa Bình, Bài phát biểu tại Hội nghị quốc tế ―Hoàn thiện hệ thống tư pháp trước những thách thức hiện nay‖, Băng Cốc, Thái Lan, 9/2018, https://tapchitoaan.vn/bai-viet/van-de-thoi-su-thoi-su/gia-tri-cot-loi-cua-toa-an-la-mang-lai-cong-bang-cho-xa-hoi-va-tao-duoc-long-tin-cua-nguoi-dan-vao-cong-ly | Link | |||
| 31. Lord Justice Briggs, Civil Courts Structure Review, Final Report, Judiciary of England and Wales, July 2016, available at:https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/civil-courts-structure-review-final-report-jul-16-final-1.pdf | Link | |||
| 32. Lord Justice Briggs, Civil Courts Structure Review, Interim Report, Judiciary of England and Wales, December 2015, available at:https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/CCSR-interim-report-dec-15-final-31.pdf | Link | |||
| 35. Dame Hazel Genn, Online Courts and the Future of Justice, Birkenhead Lecture 2017, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/sites/laws/files/birkenhead_lecture_2017_professor_dame_hazel_genn_final_version.pdf | Link | |||
| 36. Technology and the Future of the Courts, Speech by Chief Justice Allsop at TC Beirne School of Law, University of Queensland, Special Lecture Series on Technology and the Future of the Legal Profession, 26 March 2019,https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/chief-justice-allsop/allsop-cj-20190326 | Link | |||
| 38. Hill Trend, Report IV, ODR and the Courts: The Promise of 100% Access to Justice? Online Dispute Resolution 2016, available at:http://www.onlineresolution.com/hiil.pdf | Link | |||
| 42. Lord Chief Justice of England And Wales, Speech at the First International Forum on Online Courts: the Cutting Edge of Digital Reform, London, 3 December 2018, available at:https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/speech-lcj-online-court.pdf | Link | |||
| 45. Dory Reiling, Beyond court digitalization with Online Dispute Resolution, International Journal for Court Administration, Vol. 8, No. 2, May 2017, available at:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2999333 | Link | |||
| 47. UK Secretary of State for Justice, Speech at the First International Forum on Online Courts: the Cutting Edge of Digital Reform, London, 3 December 2018, available at:https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/digital-court-reform-conference-david-gauke-speech 48. Ayelet Sela, Streamlining Justice: How Online Courts Can Resolve The Challenges ofPro Se Litigation, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 26:331, 2016 | Link | |||
| 52. Zhou Yuhang, Judicial Interpretations of Provisions of the Supreme People‘s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Hearing of Cases by Internet Courts, Tsinghua China Law Review, Vol. 11:175, 2018, available at:http://www.tsinghuachinalawreview.org/articles/PDF/TCLR_1101_ChinaLawUpdate_ZHOU.pdf | Link | |||
| 53. China‘s Supreme People‘s Court, Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Cases by the Internet Courts,http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-116981.html | Link | |||
| 55. German Code of Civil Procedure, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/englisch_zpo.html | Link | |||
| 56. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/civil-rules-procedure-dec2017_0.pdf | Link | |||
| 34. Fabien Ge´linas (et. al.), Foundations of Civil Justice: Toward a Value-Based Framework for Reform, Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 | Khác | |||
| 37. Hangzhou Huatai Yimei Culture Media Co., Ltd vs. Shenzhen Daotong Technology Development Co., Ltd., Judgment of Hangzhou Internet Court, Case No.: 055078 (2018) Zhe 0192 No. 81, June 27, 2018 | Khác | |||
| 39. International Forum on Online Courts, The Cutting Edge of Digital Reform, London, 3-4 December 2018, An overview of panel sessions, jointly hosted by HMCTS and the Society for Computers and Law | Khác | |||
| 40. Ethan Katsh and Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes, Oxford University Press, 2017 | Khác | |||
| 41. Miklós Kengyel & Zoltán Nemessányi (eds.), Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure: New Paths to Justice from Around the World, Springer 2012 | Khác |
TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG
TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN