The dose-response relationship between tobacco smoking and the risk of lymphomas: A case-control study

9 23 0
The dose-response relationship between tobacco smoking and the risk of lymphomas: A case-control study

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Thông tin tài liệu

Previous studies have provided limited support to the association between tobacco smoking and lymphomas with weak evidence of a dose-response relationship.

Taborelli et al BMC Cancer (2017) 17:421 DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3414-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The dose-response relationship between tobacco smoking and the risk of lymphomas: a case-control study Martina Taborelli1, Maurizio Montella2, Massimo Libra3, Rosamaria Tedeschi4, Anna Crispo2, Maria Grimaldi2, Luigino Dal Maso1, Diego Serraino1 and Jerry Polesel1* Abstract Background: Previous studies have provided limited support to the association between tobacco smoking and lymphomas with weak evidence of a dose-response relationship Methods: We investigated the relationship between tobacco smoking and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) and Hodgkin lymphomas (HL) through logistic regression spline models Data were derived from an Italian hospitalbased case-control study (1999–2014), which enrolled 571 NHLs, 188 HLs, and 1004 cancer-free controls Smoking habits and other lifestyle factors were assessed through a validated questionnaire Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders Results: Compared to never smokers, people smoking ≥15 cigarettes/day showed increased risks of both NHL (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.97) and HL (OR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.25, 4.87); the risk was particularly elevated for follicular NHL (OR = 2.43; 95% CI:1.31–4.51) and mixed cellularity HL (OR = 5.60, 95% CI: 1.31, 23.97) No excess risk emerged for former smokers or people smoking

Ngày đăng: 06/08/2020, 07:34

Mục lục

  • Abstract

    • Background

    • Methods

    • Results

    • Conclusions

    • Background

    • Methods

      • First study period, 1999–2002

      • Second study period, 2003–2014

      • Complete study dataset

      • Questionnaire

      • Statistical methods

      • Results

      • Discussion

      • Conclusions

      • Abbreviations

      • Acknowledgments

      • Funding

      • Availability of data and materials

      • Authors’ contributions

      • Competing interests

      • Consent for publication

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan