(LUẬN văn THẠC sĩ) 11th graders’ attitudes towards their teachers’ written feedback m a thesis linguistics 60 14 01

VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES  NGUYỄN BÍCH HIỀN 11th GRADERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS THEIR TEACHERS’ WRITTEN FEEDBACK (Thái độ học sinh lớp 11 phản hồi dạng viết giáo viên) M.A MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS Field: English Teaching Methodology Code: 60140111 Hanoi, 2016 TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES  NGUYỄN BÍCH HIỀN 11th GRADERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS THEIR TEACHERS’ WRITTEN FEEDBACK (Thái độ học sinh lớp 11 phản hồi dạng viết giáo viên) M.A MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS Field: English Teaching Methodology Code: 60140111 Supervisors: Assoc.Prof.Dr Le Van Canh Hanoi, 2016 TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP I, NGUYỄN BÍCH HIỀN, hereby certify that this thesis, which is entitled “11th graders’ attitudes towards their teachers’ written feedback” is entirely my own work in the fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts at Faculty of Post-Graduate Studies, University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi It has not been submitted for assessment at any other university Hanoi, 2016 Nguyễn Bić h Hiề n i TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I am profoundly beholden to my supervisor, Assoc.Prof.Dr Lê Văn Canh, for his great expertise and unfailing support, without which the thesis would not be completed I owe a great debt of gratitude to all the lecturers of the Faculty of PostGraduate Studies, Hanoi University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, whose transfer of knowledge to me has made me grow more professionally I would like to express my sincere thanks to my course members for their sharing in times of uncertainty and for their giving my thesis a close reading My special thanks go to the English language teachers and students at Chu Van An Gifted High School of Lang Son Province for their cooperation during the data collection process I am deeply indebted to my family members for their wholehearted backing all along the way ii TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 ABSTRACT The study explores 11th graders‟ attitudes towards written corrective feedback in an English class Data were collected by means of a Likert-scale questionnaire, which was administered to 314 students of 11 th grades, 38 of whom were English-specialising students and 276 of whom were non-Englishspecialising students The questionnaire elicited information on the students‟ attitudes towards teachers‟ utilisation of various corrective feedback types Results show that the students had a positive attitude towards corrective feedback, be they English-specialising or non-English-specialising The results of this study can be viewed as a valuable contribution to existing research findings in the realm of corrective feedback Previous studies have examined the efficacy of particular corrective feedback types in certain educational environments This study provides unique findings from a unique learning environment, namely a high school for gifted students The results presented in this paper support previous findings that in certain circumstances corrective feedback works Additionally, the results reinforce the need to continue scholarship on corrective feedback and student perceptions of its use The thesis concludes with some suggestions for teachers‟ implementation of written corrective feedback on their students‟ writings iii TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii ABSTRACT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii PART A: INTRODUCTION 1 Rationale of the Study Aims of the Study, Research Questions and Scope of the Study 2.1 Aims of the Study 2.2 Research Questions 2.3 Scope of the Study 3 Method of the Study Significance of the Study Structure of the Thesis PART B: DEVELOPMENT Chapter I: LITERATURE REVIEW Attitudes Definitions of Feedback Types of Feedback 3.1 Direct Corrective Feedback 3.2 Indirect Corrective Feedback 3.3 Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback 3.4 Focused versus Unfocused Corrective Feedback 11 Effects of Corrective Feedback 11 Students‟ Attitudes towards Teachers‟ Corrective Feedback 14 CHAPTER II: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 17 Research Method 17 Data Collection Instrument 17 Research Site 18 iv TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 Participants 18 Data Analysis 18 Chapter III: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 20 Teachers‟ Frequency of Use of Written Corrective Feedback 20 1.1 Teachers‟ Frequency of Use of Direct Corrective Feedback 20 1.2 Teachers‟ Frequency of Use of Indirect Corrective Feedback 22 1.3 Teachers‟ Frequency of Use of Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback 23 1.4 Teachers‟ Frequency of Use of Unfocused Corrective Feedback 24 1.5 Teachers‟ Frequency of Use of Focused Corrective Feedback 25 Students‟ Preference for Teacher Corrective Feedback Types 25 2.1 Students‟ Preference for Direct Corrective Feedback 26 2.2 Students‟ Preference for Indirect Corrective Feedback 26 2.3 Students‟ Preference for Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback 28 2.4 Students‟ Preference for Unfocused Corrective Feedback 29 2.5 Students‟ Preference for Focused Corrective Feedback 29 Students‟ Perception of Usefulness of Various Forms of Corrective Feedback 30 3.1 Students‟ Perception of Usefulness of Direct Corrective Feedback 31 3.2 Students‟ Perception of Usefulness of Indirect Corrective Feedback 32 3.3 Students‟ Perception of Usefulness of Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback 33 3.4 Students‟ Perception of Usefulness of Unfocused Corrective Feedback 34 3.5 Students‟ Perception of Usefulness of Focused Corrective Feedback 35 Discussion 35 PART C: CONCLUSION 38 Concluding Remarks 38 Implications 39 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study 39 REFERENCES 41 APPENDIX I v TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 Ellis, R (2009) A typology of written corrective feedback types ELT Journal, 63/2 Fahim, Mansoor (2011) Corrective Feedback Provision: Mixed Pattern Vs Separate Pattern Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 1, No 8, pp 1019-1024, August 2011 © 2011 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland Fazio, L 2001 „The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students‟ Journal of Second Language Writing 10, 235–49 Feng, R., & Chen, H (2009) An analysis on the importance of motivation and strategy in postgraduates‟ English acquisition English Language Teaching, 2, 9397 Ferris, D R (1995) Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53 Ferris, D., & Roberts, B (2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second language Writing, 10, 161-184 Ferris, D R (2002) Treatment of error in second language student writing Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press Gardner, R C (1995) Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation London: Edward Arnold Gass, S M., & Selinker, L (2001) Second language acquisition: An introductory course London: Lawrence Earlbaum Hendrickson, J M (1977) Error analysis and selective correction in the adult ESL classroom: An experiment ERIC Document Reproduction Services, ED 135260 42 TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 Hendrickson, J M (1980) The treatment of error in written work Modern Language Journal, 64, 216-221 Hounsell & S.Thompson (Eds) Tutoring and demonstrating: a handbook (Sheffield, Higher Education Staff Development Agency) Hyland, F 2001 Does teacher feedback make a difference? Paper presented at BALEAP 2001 Conference, Glasgow, April, 2001 Hyland, K & Hyland, F (2006) „Feedback on second language students‟ writing‟ Language Teaching 39, 83-101 Kara, A (2009) The effect of a „Learning Theories‟ Unit on Students‟ Attitudes towards Learning Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 100-113 Kepner, (1991) Kepner, C G (1991) An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills The Modern Language Journal, 75, 305–313 Lalande, J.F (1982) Reducing composition errors: An experiment Modern Language Journal 66: 140-9 Leki, I (1991) The preferences of ESL students for error correction in collegelevel writing classes Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203-218 Liu, Yingliang (2008) The Effects of Error Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing Second Language Acquisition and Teaching The University of Arizona Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, Vol 15, 65-79 (2008) Petchprasert, Anongnad (2012) Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning Your US-China Foreign Language, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand ISSN 1539-8080 April 2012, Vol 10, No 4, 1112-1120 Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N (1998) „„If only I had more time‟‟: ESL learners‟ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions Journal of Second 43 TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 Language Writing, 7, 43–68 Richard-Amato, Patricia Making It Happen: From Interactive to Participator Language Teaching (4th ed.) Epstein Educational Enterprises Epstein Educational Resources Retrieved March 2015 Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortseed, I (1986) Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-95 Rust, C (2002) The impact of assessment on student learning, Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 145–158 Sachs, R and C Polio (2007) „Learners‟ use of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing task‟ Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 67–100 Sampson, Andrew (2001) Coded and uncoded error feedback: Effects on error frequencies in adult Columbian EFL learner‟s writings www.sciencedirect.com System 40 (2012) 494e504 Retrieved 30th March 2015 Semke, H D (1984) Effects of the red pen Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195-202 Sheen, Y (2007) The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners‟ acquisition of articles TESOL Quarterly 41(2), 255-283 Sheppard, (1992) Sheppard, K (1992) Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103-110 Schulz, R A (2001) Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback USAColombia The Modern Language Journal, 85 2, 244-258 Storch, N (2010).Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29-46 44 TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G (2010) Learners‟ processing, uptake and rentention of corrective feedback on writing Case studies Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 1-32 Truscott, J (1996) „The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes‟ Language Learning 46: 327–69 Ushida, E (2005) The role of students‟ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses CALICO Journal , 23(1), 49-78 Van Lier, L (1996) Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity London: Longman Vyatkina, Nina (2010) The Effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback in Teaching Beginning German, University of Kansas Foreign Language Annals vol 43, No.4 Weaver, Melanie A, (2007) Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors‟ written responses Nottingham Trent University, UK Published online: 18 Jan 2007 45 TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 APPENDIX QUESTIONNAIRE PHIẾU KHẢO SÁT Title of the study: 11th graders’ attitudes towards their teachers’ written feedback Tên đề tài: Thái độ học sinh lớp 11 phản hồi dạng viết giáo viên This questionnaire is intended for an investigation into 11th graders‟ attitudes towards English language teachers‟ written corrective feedback The collected data will be used for research purposes only Những câu hỏi khảo sát phục vụ cho nghiên cứu thái độ học sinh lớp 11 phản hồi chữa lỗi dạng viết giáo viên tiếng Anh Tất thông tin mà em cung cấp dùng cho mục đích nghiên cứu Personal information Thơng tin cá nhân - Your class (Lớp): ……… Indicate how often your English language teacher gives you the following types of corrective feedback by putting a tick (√) in the appropriate cell Em cho biết tần suất loại phản hồi chữa lỗi mà giáo viên dạy tiếng Anh em sử dụng chữa viết cho em Đánh dấu √ vào thích hợp Types of corrective feedback Các loại phản hồi chữa lỗi Always Luôn Usually Thường xuyên Sometimes Thỉnh thoảng Rarely Hiếm Never Không a Crossing out unnecessary letters/ words/ phrases Gạch bỏ chữ cái/ từ/ cụm từ không cần thiết b Inserting missing letters/ words/ phrases Bổ sung chữ cái/ từ/ cụm từ thiếu c Writing the correct letters or words near or above the incorrect ones Viết chữ từ bên cạnh bên chữ từ mà em viết sai d Underlining or circling your errors without correcting them Gạch chân khoanh tròn lỗi sai khơng sửa lỗi sai e Indicating errors in a given line by putting a check/ cross in the margin Báo hiệu có lỗi sai dòng chữ cách đánh dấu bên lề f Recording the number of errors in a given line in the margin Ghi bên lề số lượng lỗi sai dòng chữ I TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 g Using error codes (e.g., WW for “wrong word choice”) to indicate different types of errors Chỉ loại lỗi sai kí hiệu (ví dụ kí hiệu “WW” báo hiệu lỗi sử dụng từ sai) h Providing grammar rules and/or examples related to your errors Cung cấp quy tắc ngữ pháp và/ ví dụ liên quan đến lỗi sai em i Correcting all your errors Sửa tất lỗi sai viết em j Selecting specific types of errors (e.g., article errors, and verb tense errors) for correction Lựa chọn số loại lỗi sai viết em để sửa (ví dụ lỗi sai sử dụng mạo từ, lỗi sai chia động từ) How you feel about each type of your teacher’s corrective feedback? Indicate the ones which you like most, like, have no idea, like least, and not like at all by putting a tick (√) in the appropriate cell Đánh dấu √ vào loại phản hồi chữa lỗi mà em thích nhất, thích, khơng biết thích hay khơng, thích nhất, khơng thích giáo viên sử dụng chữa viết cho em Types of corrective feedback Các loại phản hồi chữa lỗi Like most Thích Like Thích No idea Khơng biết thích hay khơng Like Least Thích Not like at all Khơng thích a Crossing out unnecessary letters/ words/ phrases Gạch bỏ chữ cái/ từ/ cụm từ không cần thiết b Inserting missing letters/ words/ phrases Bổ sung chữ cái/ từ/ cụm từ thiếu c Writing the correct letters or words near or above the incorrect ones Viết chữ từ bên cạnh bên chữ từ mà em viết sai d Underlining or circling your errors without correcting them Gạch chân khoanh tròn lỗi sai khơng sửa lỗi sai e Indicating errors in a given line by putting a check/ cross in the margin Báo hiệu có lỗi sai dòng chữ cách đánh dấu bên lề f Recording the number of errors in a given line in the margin Ghi bên lề số lượng lỗi sai II TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 dòng chữ g Using error codes (e.g., WW for “wrong word choice”) to indicate different types of errors Chỉ loại lỗi sai kí hiệu (ví dụ kí hiệu “WW” báo hiệu lỗi sử dụng từ sai) h Providing grammar rules and/or examples related to your errors Cung cấp quy tắc ngữ pháp và/ ví dụ liên quan đến lỗi sai em i Correcting all your errors Sửa tất lỗi sai viết em j Selecting specific types of errors (e.g., article errors, and verb tense errors) for correction Lựa chọn số loại lỗi sai viết em để sửa (ví dụ lỗi sai sử dụng mạo từ, lỗi sai chia động từ) In your opinion, how useful is each type of corrective feedback that your teacher gives you? Put a tick (√) in the appropriate cell Theo em, loại phản hồi chữa lỗi mà giáo viên tiếng Anh sử dụng hữu ích nào? Đánh dấu √ vào thích hợp Types of corrective feedback Các loại phản hồi chữa lỗi Very useful Rất hữu ích Useful Hữu ích No idea Khơng biết hữu ích hay khơng Not very useful Khơng hữu ích Not useful at all Khơng hữu ích a Crossing out unnecessary letters/ words/ phrases Gạch bỏ chữ cái/ từ/ cụm từ không cần thiết b Inserting missing letters/ words/ phrases Bổ sung chữ cái/ từ/ cụm từ thiếu c Writing the correct letters or words near or above the incorrect ones Viết chữ từ bên cạnh bên chữ từ mà em viết sai d Underlining or circling your errors without correcting them Gạch chân khoanh tròn lỗi sai khơng sửa lỗi sai e Indicating errors in a given line by putting a check/ cross in the margin Báo hiệu có lỗi sai dòng chữ cách đánh dấu bên lề III TIEU LUAN MOI download : skknchat@gmail.com (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01 (LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01(LUAN.van.THAC.si).11th.graders’.attitudes.towards.their.teachers’.written.feedback.m.a.thesis.linguistics.60.14.01