Design and development of knowledge management for manufacturing  framework, solution anf strategy

Knowledge Management (KM)

Organizations worldwide, both public and private, acknowledge that knowledge is crucial for long-term success and survival Experts agree that knowledge serves as a key competitive advantage and is an organization's most valuable asset Boisot (1999) highlights that we now live in a postindustrial society where knowledge is increasingly viewed as a primary source of wealth He notes that economies rich in knowledge production and utilization often outperform those abundant in natural resources but lacking in such skills.

In the 1990s, organizations underwent a significant transformation in their self-perception and understanding of competition, recognizing that their competitive advantage stemmed from intangible resources such as core competencies, intellectual capital, and collective knowledge rather than traditional assets like land, labor, and capital This shift highlighted that products and services are reflections of an organization’s collective knowledge, positioning knowledge as the key driver of competencies and capabilities As a result, companies globally are now focused on leveraging their collective knowledge to create value for customers and stakeholders Over the past decade, both formal and informal practices for managing this critical resource have emerged, leading organizations across various sectors to develop tailored knowledge management (KM) strategies that align with their unique vision and culture, thus advancing the theory and practice of KM.

The rise of knowledge as a crucial factor of production is largely due to advancements in strategic management and economic theory, particularly the resource-based view (RBV) of organizations This perspective emphasizes the significance of an organization's resources and capabilities over its products and services.

Resources and capabilities serve as a foundational platform for firms to develop diverse products for multiple markets The essence of a resource-based strategy lies in effectively leveraging these resources and capabilities across various markets and product lines While products and markets may fluctuate over time, the underlying resources and capabilities tend to be more stable and enduring Consequently, the Resource-Based View (RBV) posits that competitive advantage derived from resources and capabilities is likely to be more sustainable than that achieved through product offerings and market positioning alone.

The Resource-Based View (RBV) emphasizes the importance of firms having unique and inimitable resources to maintain a competitive edge Scholars and business leaders concur that a company's knowledge is a critical asset for competitiveness, as most other resources can be easily replicated.

In 1999, companies that possess superior knowledge can uniquely coordinate and combine their traditional resources and capabilities, ultimately delivering greater value to customers than their competitors The concepts of "organizational learning" (Argyris 1992; Senge 1990), "core competence" (Prahalad and Hamel 1990), and "intellectual capital" (Quinn 1992) highlight the critical role of knowledge as a resource and emphasize the necessity for organizations to develop the ability to effectively manage it.

The term "Knowledge Management" (KM) was introduced by Karl Wiig in 1986 during a conference in Switzerland, where he defined it as a systematic and deliberate approach to building, renewing, and applying knowledge to enhance an organization's effectiveness and returns from its knowledge assets Later, in 1991, Nonaka expanded on this concept within management literature, coining the phrase "knowledge-creating companies" and illustrating the transformation of knowledge.

The major inspirations for knowledge management (KM) practices stem from influential firms like Matsushita and Canon, as highlighted by Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) in their seminal work on "knowledge-creating companies." Leonard-Barton (1995) further propelled the KM movement with her concept of "wellsprings of knowledge," which was inspired by the practices at Chaparral Steel Since 1995, there has been a significant surge in KM literature, including numerous articles, books, and journals Notably, the Strategic Management Journal featured a special issue on KM in 1996, followed by the launch of the Journal of KM in 1998.

Management consultancies such as KPMG and Ernst & Young have significantly contributed to knowledge management (KM) through various surveys and by identifying leaders in the field Many organizations have established the role of chief knowledge officers (CKOs), akin to chief financial officers and chief information officers Academia has also embraced this trend, with positions like "professor of knowledge" emerging at institutions such as the University of California Gamble and Blackwell (2001) highlighted that KM encompasses a diverse array of disciplines and technologies, including cognitive science, expert systems, library and information science, organizational science, and network technology.

KM came into sight as a discipline in itself

Objectives, Usefulness, Drivers, and Processes of KM

The primary aim of the Knowledge Management (KM) initiative is to systematically capture and store both explicit and tacit knowledge related to various organizational aspects, such as personnel, skills, processes, and market dynamics, making it accessible to employees on a "who need what basis." Historically, knowledge management has been practiced by individuals, organizations, and nations, but only recently have researchers and managers recognized the importance of conscious and purposeful knowledge management This shift emphasizes treating knowledge as a valuable resource and capability rather than merely a byproduct of products, processes, and personnel Key drivers for KM, identified through semi-structured interviews with 43 executives from 32 manufacturing organizations, highlight the internal and external factors influencing this transition.

Travel date is fixed Which train to choose?

Psychiatrist, teacher, chess player, astrologer, architect, director

Carpenter, chef, musician, surgeon, mechanic, athlete, driver, tailor, actor, etc.

Knowledge that has been articulated in the form of words, sentences, pictures, audio, video, and material.

Books, flowcharts, pictures, designs, algorithms, graphs, patents, technical reports, recipes, etc

Knowledge, that is not articulated, but actionable.

All of one’s knowledge rests in a tacit dimension.

Fig 1.3 Key drivers of KM

From a practical standpoint, drivers are categorized into internal and external types, with insights gathered from executives' experiences within the organization Utilizing this knowledge in the workplace enables the reduction of rework through knowledge reuse, the leveraging of best practices via knowledge redeployment, the transfer of skills and behaviors, and the repurposing of knowledge to foster innovation, ultimately leading to significant business benefits.

Knowledge management (KM) is essential for tracking and retaining valuable information within an organization, enabling effective dissemination to the right audiences Developing a culture of knowledge sharing and supportive mechanisms is crucial for maximizing KM benefits Key advantages of KM include enhanced capture and management of intellectual assets, improved collaboration for knowledge sharing, increased agility in adapting to market and regulatory changes, and better continuity of knowledge during organizational transitions.

KM involves managing the following knowledge-related activities in the organization:

5 Knowledge creation (or generation/production)

The activities outlined are not mutually exclusive, exhaustive, or sequentially ordered They encompass 15 knowledge-related activities that organizations engage in, either consciously or subconsciously The primary "KM Processes" highlighted in both theory and practice are essential for effective knowledge management.

Effective management of the four key knowledge management (KM) processes—identification, acquisition, representation, and classification—ensures the successful execution of supporting activities such as capture, storage, access, dissemination, networking, integration, and organization By consciously focusing on these primary KM processes, an organization can streamline and enhance all related processes, leading to a more efficient knowledge management strategy.

Importance and Implementation of KM

Research indicates that effective communication and knowledge management (KM) are essential for successful supply chain coordination and integration in manufacturing organizations.

Knowledge Management (KM) is a structured approach that involves generating, creating, and sharing information, while also selecting, distilling, and utilizing both explicit and tacit knowledge This process relies on key elements such as people, processes, and technology to deliver unique value, enabling organizations to gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.

Knowledge Management (KM) plays a crucial role in enhancing an organization's competitiveness by focusing on key pillars such as policies, strategies, and techniques It emphasizes the integration of people, processes, and technology to create optimal conditions for efficiency improvements, innovation, and collaboration among employees (Sousa and Hendriks, 2006).

Knowledge Management (KM) lacks standardized guidelines or step-by-step procedures for implementation within organizations, as it is still evolving in both theory and practice Currently, there are no established KM Maturity Models or Certification Agencies, leading many companies to experiment with various KM models The challenge remains in effectively measuring the costs and benefits associated with these approaches.

Knowledge Management (KM) presents challenges for managers who struggle to persuade their organizations to invest in it However, one key advantage of KM is that it is fundamentally an internal organizational process, limiting the role of external consultants in its design This distinguishes KM from being merely another management trend driven by academics and consultants for profit With a wealth of free resources, including case studies and success stories available online, organizations only need to establish a KM team to initiate their KM efforts effectively.

The following are some of the key points that need to be borne in mind when implementing KM in organizations:

Knowledge Management (KM) relies on the active participation of all employees; its success hinges on their belief in its value Rather than being imposed from above or below, KM should empower individuals to take ownership of their contributions For KM to thrive, it must be embraced as a collective responsibility, ensuring that employees feel self-motivated and engaged in the process.

KM can be implemented through a big-bang approach or a piecemeal approach

In the big-bang approach to knowledge management (KM), the implementation occurs organization-wide, while the piecemeal approach focuses on specific departments or functions Many organizations initially test KM strategies within a small division before scaling up to other areas of the organization.

Integrating knowledge management (KM) processes—such as acquisition, creation, sharing, utilization, and transfer—into the core activities of an organization is crucial for success Employees should view KM as an integral part of their daily routine rather than an additional task Over time, these KM activities will seamlessly blend into the organizational culture Conversely, if KM is treated as a separate initiative, it may encounter resistance from employees, hindering its effectiveness.

KM team can be formed to take care of activities that are different from the organi- zation’s regular routine

Measurement is a crucial aspect of management activities, as managers rely on quantifiable data to validate concepts and philosophies Before implementing Knowledge Management (KM), it is essential to choose appropriate measurement tools that align with familiar instruments.

Improving organizational performance parameters through Knowledge Management (KM) is essential for businesses Key areas for enhancement may include reducing employee attrition, boosting regional sales, improving product quality, minimizing waste, and increasing customer response times By measuring these performance metrics before and after KM implementation, organizations can seamlessly integrate KM into daily operations while building employee confidence in the process.

Knowledge Management (KM) is not exclusive to large organizations with significant IT investments; it is applicable to businesses of all sizes and types According to Hansen et al (1999), there are two primary KM strategies: personalization and codification The personalization strategy focuses on connecting individuals with knowledge to those who require it, a method utilized by consultancies like McKinsey In contrast, the codification strategy emphasizes documenting and storing knowledge in databases for wider dissemination, as practiced by firms like Ernst & Young Organizations can choose either strategy based on their resources and culture.

Key activities in Knowledge Management (KM) implementation include various organizational efforts that are not necessarily sequential While some activities may be interdependent, KM theory currently lacks a definitive step-by-step framework for effective implementation.

A knowledge audit is conducted by the KM team, which includes essential organizational employees with in-depth operational knowledge This process entails identifying and cataloging key knowledge assets and competencies, pinpointing experts across various knowledge domains within the organization, and classifying knowledge assets into distinct groups for better management and utilization.

The "knowledge vision" document outlines the current knowledge capabilities of the organization and identifies the short-term and long-term capabilities that must be developed to maintain a competitive edge.

Knowledge mapping is a crucial exercise that involves identifying and organizing all knowledge assets within an organization This process can be tailored to specific departments, functions, or domains, or it can encompass the entire organization, providing a comprehensive overview of available knowledge resources.

Motivation of Research

Implementing a Knowledge Management (KM) system can be complex and dynamic, often facing challenges due to organizational inertia that favors existing practices over new initiatives Factors such as individual and group involvement, the current status of processes, and the technology landscape can hinder the necessary commitment for successful implementation To achieve effective KM solutions, it is essential to consider six critical success factors, which are outlined in detail below (Bixler 2002).

A successful Knowledge Management (KM) system within an enterprise hinges on a well-defined strategic plan that articulates an inspiring vision of its intended value Effective implementation requires a tailored approach that aligns with the unique needs of the enterprise and its stakeholders, ensuring that the KM strategy is both comprehensive and actionable.

2 Organizational and communication assessment and training: Organizational pro- cesses, procedures, and workfl ow are central to successful enterprise operations The

KM implementation strategy must be aligned with these organizational distinctions

Additionally, a well-developed enterprise communication system and learning system is necessary to facilitate effective KM implementation Emphasis must be on the critical importance of collaboration

A Knowledge Management (KM) system should be guided by business drivers that align with client demands, regardless of the enterprise's awareness of this need Leadership plays a crucial role in articulating the business vision by showcasing how a KM system can enhance business processes and facilitate transformation within the organization It is essential to understand that implementing KM represents a significant shift from conventional business practices.

The successful implementation of a Knowledge Management (KM) system necessitates coordinated efforts across the enterprise, underpinned by the organization's management structure This alignment is crucial for meeting the growing demands of KM while maintaining current service levels and supporting existing business operations, ultimately facilitating the achievement of the overall business vision.

Effective knowledge management (KM) systems rely on essential KM tools and infrastructure, which serve as the backbone of their success While these technological tools are crucial enablers, they are not the sole components of a comprehensive KM strategy.

Effective integration of Knowledge Management (KM) systems within an organization is crucial and necessitates adequate resourcing It is essential for senior management to dedicate appropriate levels of resources to successfully manage and sustain a KM system and its integrated programs.

Research in Knowledge Management (KM) indicates that successful KM solution implementation in organizations hinges on well-designed models addressing key elements of processes, people, and technology To explore these critical factors, a Delphi study was conducted by Nevo and Chan (2007a) involving a semi-structured questionnaire aimed at top management executives responsible for selecting and evaluating Knowledge Management Solutions (KMS) in manufacturing organizations The study engaged 43 executives from various manufacturing sectors in India, with company sizes ranging from 200 to over 20,000 employees Interviews were carried out both in person and via telephone, adhering to a structured interview protocol Post-interview notes were analyzed to pinpoint potential challenges, requiring follow-up clarification in only one instance The study involved four rounds of discussions to finalize the results.

Some of the statements from the interview are stated below:

• Well, I guess my perception is yes they have infl uence, but it’s very labor inten- sive and very time intensive

• It’s doing what we asked it to do, but we’re missing the boat on its potential right now, so that [is] actually something I say have infl uence

• We’re still too early to evaluate whether or not the million dollars worth of savings are real, but I honestly believe it is there

We are working towards providing bedside access to a program that will assist healthcare professionals in looking up best practices While we are on the right track, we have not yet fully implemented this solution.

• Where we are today and where we expect to be? I honestly think this will have infl uence

To enhance the efficiency of your research, it is crucial to track the time spent throughout the entire process, as research often requires a significant investment of time This approach will not yield immediate results but is essential for achieving long-term success.

The Delphi study led to the development of a temporal confirmation conceptual model, which includes six key modules essential for creating a comprehensive framework, design, model, and strategy for knowledge management (KM) solutions It is crucial for organizations to understand the specific requirements and design elements of these modules prior to implementing any KM solutions.

1 Readiness level of people, process, and technology for the change

2 Behavior pattern of people for the change and for knowledge creation, use, and reuse

3 Taxonomy and technology architecture landscape with navigation and content layer of KM components

4 Process design for knowledge capture, storage and retrieval, and environment design for organization structure

5 Reward, learning, and communication design

6 Linkage design for internal and external levels and functions of organization

Readiness Level of people Process & Technology

Implementation of knowledge Management Solution

Fig 1.5 Temporal confi rmation conceptual model for research

A comprehensive literature review was conducted on six essential modules—readiness assessment, behavior assessment, taxonomy and technology architecture, process, environment, reward and communication design, as well as learning and linkage design at both internal and external organizational levels This analysis aims to identify research gaps and highlights key observations derived from the thorough examination of these critical elements.

The foundational research for readiness assessment is established by Hanafi Zadeh et al (2009) and Khalfan et al (2001) To effectively conduct a readiness assessment exercise, it is essential to develop a conceptual framework and a generic design tailored for this purpose.

2 The base research paper for behavior assessment is King and Marks Jr ( 2008 ) There is no generic behavior assessment model in KM perspective

Revilla et al (2005) provide foundational research on taxonomy architecture, highlighting a significant gap in the development of a generic framework and model for knowledge management (KM) taxonomy architecture Additionally, Chua (2004) serves as the cornerstone for technology architecture, emphasizing the critical need for a universal technology architecture model to enhance KM solutions.

Paiva et al (2008) serves as the foundational research paper for the design of processes, environments, rewards, and communication It highlights the absence of a one-size-fits-all approach for implementing these elements effectively.

KM solution in manufacturing industry

5 The base research paper for learning, reward, and communication design is Peter and John ( 2006 ), and a generic design and model for this element is a research gap

Huang (2010) serves as a foundational research paper addressing the linkage design for both internal and external organizational levels and functions It highlights the significant research gaps in integrating the balanced scorecard with vendor-managed inventory systems.

Scope of the Present Study

1 Development of conceptual framework and generic readiness assessment design and model for the readiness assessment exercise in KM perspective

2 Development of conceptual framework and generic behavior assessment design and model for the behavior assessment exercise in KM perspective

3 Generic base framework, design, and model development for KM taxonomy and technology architecture

4 Development of generic framework, design, and model for process, environ- ment, reward, and communication design

5 Development of generic learning design and model

6 Development of generic framework, design, and model for linkage of balanced scorecard and vendor-managed inventory in KM perspective

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_2, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Survey Overview

KM in India

India boasts a profound tradition of knowledge that spans several millennia, posing fundamental questions about ultimate reality and the universe's origins This ancient civilization cultivated extensive expertise across diverse fields such as astronomy, metallurgy, healthcare, agriculture, and the arts Knowledge was shared through both written forms, like palm leaves, and oral traditions, reflecting a rich creative expression in prose, poetry, and various artistic representations Furthermore, much of this wisdom is intricately woven into the daily lives of people, showcasing how the insights of our ancestors continue to influence contemporary society.

It is indeed ironical that a country with such a tradition has not taken the lead in

Knowledge Management (KM) in business is influenced by both academics and managers, yet there is a noticeable lack of representation of our country in the KM literature, including journal papers, articles, and books This absence is particularly striking given that we were pioneers in analyzing foundational concepts in the field.

Buddhi (intelligence), and Vijnana/Jnana (knowledge/wisdom) Our ancestors also separated apara jnana (knowledge concerning the created world) from para jnana

Our extensive body of knowledge, which includes the Vedas, Epics, Upanishads, Puranas, Brahma Sutras, and Bhagavad Gita, offers profound insights into various concepts of knowledge Although some may argue that our tradition lacks a focus on business organizations, it is essential to recognize that the history of formal and organized businesses in India is relatively recent compared to the West Therefore, it is crucial for both academics and practitioners to adapt insights and experiences from other fields to enhance business practices.

Knowledge Management (KM) is still in its early stages in India, with few companies designating dedicated personnel for its implementation Often, KM is added to existing roles, leading to inadequate attention and care However, this approach is unsustainable in the face of India's increasingly competitive business landscape KM has transitioned from being a luxury to a critical necessity for Indian companies, as it can significantly impact their survival and success in the market.

Background for Detailed Survey

Based on the study in Chap 1 , the organizations should know the level and process blueprint of the below elements before the implementation of KM solution:

1 Readiness level of people, process, and technology for the change

2 Behavior pattern of people for the change and for knowledge creation, use, and reuse

3 Taxonomy and technology architecture landscape with navigation and content layer of KM components

4 Process design for knowledge capture, storage and retrieval, and environment design for organization structure

5 Reward, learning, and communication design

6 Linkage design for internal and external levels and functions of organization

The detailed literature pertaining to all the modules/elements is discussed further in this chapter.

Readiness Assessment

Despite early proclamations regarding the value of knowledge and managing knowledge, the KM movement has been viewed as a “fad” or “recycled” concept

The landscape of organizational management is shifting towards a knowledge-based approach, as highlighted by Spiegler (2000) Davenport and Grover emphasize that knowledge management (KM) is increasingly recognized as essential for organizations, given the growing number of knowledge workers handling vast amounts of information As KM becomes a competitive necessity, leaders are prompted to consider how to initiate this process and assess their organization's readiness Qualitative research has identified several "enablers" of effective organizational KM, revealing common themes despite the diversity in literature.

Implementing knowledge management (KM) projects in an organization necessitates essential organizational prerequisites Without adequate infrastructure and preparation, the KM process can become unprofitable and potentially detrimental To mitigate these risks, it is advisable to conduct a readiness assessment to evaluate the organization's willingness and capability to undertake the implementation of KM initiatives.

The detailed review on readiness assessment in the context of KM is carried out and relevant literature is indicated here

Kenett et al (2008) utilized multivariate methods to analyze risk profiles and readiness assessments during different phases of enterprise system implementation Li et al (2010) introduced an e-Health readiness assessment framework by merging elements from existing frameworks and quantifying their constructs Ryoo et al (2009) created a comprehensive readiness assessment framework aimed at protecting citizens and government entities from website theft Additionally, Islam (2010) developed the Innovative Manufacturing Readiness Levels (IMRLs) matrix to evaluate and understand the maturity of manufacturing processes.

Readiness assessment for micro- and nano-manufacturing technologies has been explored by various researchers to evaluate a company's preparedness for implementing knowledge management (KM) Mohammadi et al (2009) introduced a readiness assessment framework, validated through exploratory factor analyses, while Holt et al (2007) developed a synergistic instrument to measure KM readiness within organizations Shirazi et al (2011) examined the influence of individual and contextual factors on employees' commitment to KM initiatives Keith et al (2006) highlighted significant differences in KM readiness across groups in a Fortune 500 financial firm transitioning to a service-oriented model Bui et al (2003) proposed a framework for e-readiness assessment to guide national strategic decisions in the new economy Additionally, Miri-Nargesi et al (2011) identified key factors for customer relationship management (CRM) readiness, emphasizing the importance of top management commitment, project management capability, IT infrastructure, customer-oriented culture, and well-defined CRM processes.

Behavior Assessment

Relevant Research of Behavior in Aspect

Moutinho and Hutcheson ( 2007 ) developed a predictive model of store patronage behavior for consumers Gao and Wei ( 2007 ) investigated the ethical acceptability

We focused this research in the component of “people”

The correlation model results illustrate significant relationships among various role behaviors, including interaction management, ambiguity tolerance, and empathy Notably, the data reveals a strong correlation between culture shock and interaction posture, with a coefficient of 0.705 Adjustment shows a moderate correlation of 0.686 with respect, indicating a positive relationship Effectiveness also presents noteworthy correlations, particularly with interaction management at 0.441 and empathy at 0.483 Overall, these findings underscore the importance of interpersonal dynamics and cultural adaptability in enhancing effectiveness and adjustment in diverse environments.

Chinese enterprises exhibit a range of behaviors influenced by executive perspectives Zhao and Tian (2009) emphasized that consumer perceptions of social rewards and punishments significantly affect ethical judgments in various consumption contexts Larsson et al (2009) proposed a leadership chain model linking leadership behaviors to health, customer satisfaction, and overall organizational effectiveness Chen (2009) explored how relationship-selling behaviors and switching barriers jointly impact service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty Singh (2009) examined the influence of organizational learning on knowledge management processes Vouzas (2009) highlighted the importance of human resources, particularly employee behavior and commitment, for the successful implementation of processes Suppiah and Sandhu (2011) found that organizational culture types affect tacit knowledge-sharing behaviors, with variations based on cultural context Mills and Smith (2011) assessed how specific knowledge management enablers and processes influence organizational performance.

Taxonomy and Technology Architecture

Taxonomy, as defined by Cote (2005), is a classification system that effectively addresses modern information access challenges by representing open systems and abstract concepts in the digital realm It synthesizes user needs and language, often independent of traditional classification schemes, and can include hierarchical structures with controlled vocabularies Additionally, taxonomies enhance semantic understanding by illustrating connections and processes, facilitating broader knowledge application They are adaptable, allowing for ongoing growth and revision in response to changing factors A comprehensive review of taxonomy and technology architecture in knowledge management is provided, highlighting relevant literature.

Doherty et al (2005) highlighted the integration of knowledge management (KM) techniques with ontologies to enhance environmental design, implementation, and operations through an expert knowledge base system Gupta et al (2009) emphasized the necessity for organizations to instill values that promote knowledge sharing and to align practices that facilitate this process Spiteri et al (2010) developed a mobile KM (mKM) system architecture designed to support designers in mobile work environments with lifecycle knowledge assistance.

(2009) investigated the structure of industrial network strategies in the current global manufacturing environment based on the empirical analysis and employed

The hierarchical analysis of taxonomy and technology architecture is essential for developing industrial network strategies Reddi et al (2011) introduced a service-oriented architecture (SOA) framework for effective engineering change management (ECM) across supply chains and collaborative product development networks Lynch et al (2009) utilized a taxonomic process in operational decision-making through Decision Support Software (DSS) to enhance organizational decision processes Lodree et al (2009) created a scheduling framework for human tasks that considers both physical and cognitive characteristics Liu et al (2008) developed a knowledge management (KM) and retrieval system using a hierarchical text classification scheme to organize extensive manufacturing-related documents based on a manufacturing knowledge taxonomy Snyder et al (2000) emphasized the importance of identifying process taxonomies to facilitate communication of KM processes within organizations Additionally, Carthy et al (2000) proposed the "cladistics" management technique to help organizations systematically understand the emergence of new manufacturing forms in their business environments.

Process, Environment, Reward, and Communication Design

Before implementing a Knowledge Management (KM) solution, it is essential to focus on key elements such as process design, organizational structure, reward plans, and communication strategies A thorough examination of these components—process, environment, rewards, and communication—within the KM context is conducted, supported by relevant literature.

Choi et al (2004) integrated knowledge management (KM) and business process management into a unified framework, categorizing process knowledge into three types Rehman et al (2007) emphasized the significance of design context knowledge for structured decision-making and predicting outcomes during the conceptual design phase Wei et al (2008) highlighted the importance of KM processes—knowledge acquisition, integration, exploitation, and protection—for fostering innovation within firms Hassan et al (2007) discussed reusing knowledge about causal relationships and validating design robustness through Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Franken et al (2006) noted that aligning KM approaches with an organization’s strategic and operational decisions is crucial for achieving desired benefits Finally, Salah et al (2011) introduced a knowledge-based system aimed at enhancing creative conceptual design, requiring the integration of design processes, creative tools, and design knowledge.

In 2008, two techniques for mining change logs in adaptive process management systems were introduced, highlighting the role of process mining as an analytical tool This approach enables a deeper understanding of the timing and reasons behind process changes, thereby facilitating truly flexible processes.

Management control systems (MCS) significantly influence individual knowledge processes and the successful implementation of knowledge management (KM) in firms (Kunz et al., 2010) Integrated construction supply chain management (SCM) enhances overall production through effective KM (Khalfan et al., 2010) Additionally, communities of practice (CoPs) serve as a valuable means for leveraging both explicit and tacit knowledge within organizations (Moon et al., 2011).

Learning Design

Organizational intelligence stems from collective learning and knowledge sharing, as emphasized by Levitt and March (1988), who view organizational learning as a form of intelligence The concept of the learning organization (LO), introduced by Pedler et al (1989) and popularized by Senge (1990) in "The Fifth Discipline," highlights the importance of integrative and interactive knowledge structures for firm learning Communities of practice, both formal and informal, facilitate learning and improvisation, as noted by Seely-Brown and Duguid (1991), while Dyck et al (2005) highlight the role of socialization in tacit error correction within these communities Behling and Eckel (1991) identify expert and entrepreneurial intuition as crucial for effective knowledge sharing and knowledge management (KM) implementation Isaacs (1993) points out the reciprocal influence of individual cognitive maps and their domains, while Argyris (2004) discusses single-loop and double-loop learning in organizational contexts Tsang (1997) stresses the integration of prescriptive and descriptive research for effective organizational learning, which Crossan et al (1999) argue is essential for strategic renewal Bontis et al (2002) analyze the social and behavioral dynamics of learning processes, and Nonaka (1994) presents a framework for managing organizational knowledge creation, while Robinson (2001) differentiates between the normative aspects of LO and the descriptive nature of organizational learning, emphasizing the significance of leadership, culture, and communication systems.

Raman and Murali (2000) emphasized that collaborative knowledge creation and sharing are essential for a firm's success Additionally, Rahim (2002) noted that an interactive process becomes crucial when it reveals incompatibilities.

Learning design can benefit from addressing disagreements or dissonance among social entities, as true learning often emerges from these conflicts James and Abraham (2002) highlighted that effective cooperative decision-making is essential in knowledge-based environments, particularly within software firms Knowledge management (KM) possesses a multidimensional nature at the organizational level, emphasizing the importance of social and behavioral dynamics in learning processes (Argote et al 2003; Bontis et al 2002) Furthermore, Ambjorn et al (2008) suggested that conceptual modeling plays a crucial role in enhancing learning design implementation.

De Kereki et al (2004) introduced a novel learning environment model that enhances problem-solving abilities and facilitates the transfer of knowledge across different contexts Additionally, Cavaleri (2004) highlighted the evolution of knowledge transfer at the organizational level, progressing from first-generation to second and third-generation approaches.

KM and that the process of KM integration happens successfully when knowledge transfer happens from individual and group level to the organizational level (Vera and Crossan 2004 )

The evolution of knowledge management (KM) has transitioned from a computational to an organic view, emphasizing both tacit and explicit knowledge (Hazlett et al., 2005; Argote, 2005) Organizational capabilities for knowledge creation can be enhanced through practice and learning, leading to the development of ontology-based KM environments (Masataka et al., 2006) The application of learning and KM principles within internal processes has been explored through modified learning models (Kenneth, 2010) Peter and John (2006) connected organizational learning (OL), learning organizations (LO), and KM at the process level, theorizing on the five disciplines of Senge and the knowledge creation spiral of Nonaka, thereby enriching the understanding of their interrelations However, barriers to effective learning transfer across organizational levels have been identified, with a lack of connection to learning processes being a significant implementation challenge (Sun and Scott, 2003) These issues contribute to the gap between different KM streams, as highlighted by Hans (2009), who discussed various obstacles impeding KM implementation and the impact of cost-benefit considerations on policy and decision-making Furthermore, Andrew et al (2010) proposed a framework for technology-enhanced learning (TEL) through Deep Learning Design (DLD), which fosters sustainable innovations in learning.

In examining the intersection of knowledge management and multinational corporations, Pablos (2004) identified that effective human resource policies are crucial for achieving global efficiency, local sensibility, and organizational learning Supporting this, Alas and Vadi (2006) found that institutional environments significantly affect cultural orientations, which in turn enhance employee attitudes toward change in a study of 44 Estonian organizations Leseure (2010) highlighted that a single organizational design and culture may not be suitable for diverse international operational networks, as evidenced by case studies in Moroccan textile apparel offshore factories Furthermore, Alas (2008) explored the dynamics of organizational change and learning across production and service sectors during societal transitions, drawing insights from top management interviews.

A study involving 25 of 137 Estonian organizations highlighted the role of culture in shaping employee responses to change Similarly, research by Alas et al (2008) in 29 Chinese organizations underscored the significance of organizational learning (OL) and culture in enhancing readiness for change, emphasizing the importance of task and relationship orientation within organizational culture Singh (2009) further explored the relationship between organizational learning and knowledge management (KM) processes through quantitative research, revealing a substantial connection Additionally, Loss et al (2010) proposed a theoretical framework for Learning Collaborative Networked Organizations (L-CNOs), integrating OL and KM paradigms to bolster the study's foundational elements.

Balanced Scorecard

The literature review for balanced scorecard (BSC) in the context of KM is detailed in Table 2.2 and Table 2.3

Table 2.2 Strategy tool for performance management system

Business metric Contribution of research Reference

Intangible valuation Intangible assets are evaluated to extract their value components and align them with business strategy

Balanced score for BSC Theory is used to calculate the relative weightage for each factor and comparison

New challenge for BSC Organizations have quite different needs, market areas, people, products, and services and will end up with signifi cantly different balanced scorecards

Strategic planning General concepts of strategies planning, system of management of quality and BSC, in order to assist it in the development of the model

Performance measures To analyze the effi ciency and benefi ts of supply chain (SC) scientifi cally and validate the usability of methods on performance evaluation index system

Mapping of KM and business strategy

Impact and importance of KM activities in performance of BSC, such as fi nancial, internal process as well as learning and growth perspectives

Chen and Mohamed ( 2008 ) 2.7 Balanced Scorecard

Vendor-Managed Inventory

Single Vendor and Single Buyer

Hoque and Goyal (2000) established an optimal policy for a single-vendor, single-buyer integrated production inventory system, addressing both capacity constraints and varying shipment sizes Chaouch (2001) introduced a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) model that aims to find the best balance between inventory investment, delivery rates, and shortages Additionally, Fry et al contributed to the understanding of inventory management strategies.

Research has demonstrated the superiority of Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) systems over Retailer Managed Inventory, as noted by 2001 studies Additionally, Dong and Xu (2002) developed a model illustrating the profit functions for both vendors and buyers, while Viswanathan and Wang (2003) confirmed that the VMI model facilitates perfect coordination through the simultaneous offering of quantity and volume discounts.

Single Vendor and Single Buyer

Disney and Towill (2002) emphasized the evaluation and optimization of the Automatic Pipeline, Inventory Order Based Production Control System (APIOBPCS)-VMI model to reduce inventory holding and production adaptation costs In 2003, David and Eben-Chaime developed and analyzed inventory cost models for individual parties and joint systems Additionally, Disney and Towill (2003a, b) created a simulation model to study the bullwhip effect, while Disney et al (2004) established e-business-enabled supply chain models to assess the impact of information and communication technologies on dynamic behavior.

Single Vendor and Multiple Buyer

In 1995, Lu introduced an optimal solution procedure for a one-vendor one-buyer scenario and developed a heuristic approach for cases involving multiple buyers Waller et al (1999) created a model for a manufacturing plant that services various retailers via three types of distribution centers, which they simulated for performance evaluation In 2000, Cetinkaya and Lee proposed an analytical model to coordinate inventory and transportation decisions within a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system Additionally, Achabal et al (2000) designed a decision support system for VMI that incorporates forecasting, inventory decision-making, and parameter estimation models specifically tailored for an apparel manufacturer.

In 2001, researchers explored integrated inventory and transportation decisions within Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) systems, building on the models established by Cetinkaya and Lee in 2000, and introduced both an efficient algorithm for precise optimization and a heuristic alternative Viswanathan and Piplani (2001) developed a model to examine the advantages of synchronizing supply chain inventories through shared replenishment periods Further, Piplani and Viswanathan (2003) performed a numerical analysis to assess how different parameters influence total costs in a supplier-owned inventory strategy Additionally, Smaros et al (2003) utilized simulation techniques to investigate demand visibility.

Single Vendor and Multiple Buyer

Kleywegt et al (2002) introduced the inventory routing problem as a Markov decision process, proposing approximation methods for effective solutions Gerchak and Khmelnitsky (2003) addressed the retailer’s and supplier’s challenges within a newsvendor framework, utilizing a dynamic programming approach Additionally, Jaruphongsa et al (2003) developed a mathematical model and presented a polynomial time algorithm grounded in dynamic programming to achieve optimal problem resolution.

Empirical Analyses/Case Studies

Holmstrom ( 1998 ) conducted a case study to show how VMI could be implemented for an enterprise resources planning (ERP) environment Smaros and Holmstrom

In recent studies, researchers have explored various aspects of Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) systems For instance, (2000) focused on data capture, transfer, and management within VMI frameworks Daugherty et al (2001) conducted an empirical investigation into electronic data interchange (EDI), barcoding, and the capabilities of information systems Kaipia et al (2002) introduced a time-based approach to evaluate the benefits of VMI Additionally, Kulp (2002) analyzed how VMI relates to information precision, reliability, consumer demand variability, and its impact on wholesale pricing Finally, Tyan and Wee (2003) surveyed the Taiwanese grocery industry, concluding that VMI significantly reduces inefficiencies.

Vendor-Managed Inventory (VMI) plays a crucial role in reducing costs, enhancing service levels, and creating business opportunities within the supply chain Yang et al (2003) identified five critical factors of VMI through literature review and simulated a dual-level VMI delivery system De Toni and Zamolo (2004) focused on the implementation of VMI in electrical household appliances, emphasizing the importance of forecasting and dispatch planning Additionally, Kuk (2004) conducted a survey in the electronic industry to assess VMI's impact on information quality, service improvement, and cost reduction For a comprehensive overview of VMI applications, please refer to Table 2.4.

Observations and Research Gap

A thorough review of existing literature highlights the necessity for a comprehensive framework and models for the six key modules of knowledge management (KM) solutions The strategic significance of knowledge underscores the imperative for organizations to actively manage this vital resource, which is essential for their long-term sustainability and success.

Table 2.4 Applications of vendor-managed inventory

Application Contribution of research Reference

Challenge of managing logistics in small items in construction industry

Tanskanen et al ( 2008 ) Patterns of VMI Three empirically grounded patterns of VMI are proposed Five contextual inhibitors of VMI impacts are suggested

Discrete event simulation helps manufacturers integrate traditional order data from non-VMI customers with sales data from VMI customers to enhance production and inventory control, ultimately improving manufacturing efficiency.

The efficient operation of Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) in the retail industry is influenced by several challenging factors A successful VMI strategy relies on fostering a constructive and open relationship between major retailers and their key suppliers.

Guideline of VMI Proposed standard agreement has a fl exible structure easily adopted in industrial fi elds of VMI

Zammori et al ( 2009 ) Success factors of VMI

VMI success is impacted by quality of the buyer– supplier relationship, IT system, and intensity of information sharing

VMI-based simulation approach can minimize the inventory level

Reddy and Vrat ( 2007 ) Benefi ts of VMI in stochastic demand

Proposed VMI strategies, to reduce the order picking cost and transportation costs resulting in reduced total supply chain costs

In 2010, research highlighted a significant gap in the literature regarding the assessment and development of key modules essential for achieving success and establishing a sustainable competitive advantage.

1 There is a need for development of conceptual framework and generic readiness assessment design and model for the readiness assessment exercise in KM perspective

2 There is a need for development of conceptual framework and generic readiness assessment design and model for the behavior assessment exercise in KM perspective

3 Generic base framework, design, and model for KM taxonomy and technology architecture is a research lacuna

4 There is a need for development of generic framework, design, and model for process, environment, reward, and communication design for implementation of

KM solution in manufacturing industry

5 A generic learning design and model is a research gap

6 Development of generic framework, design, and model for linkage of balanced scorecard and vendor-managed inventory in KM perspective is needed

This research aims to create a comprehensive framework, design, and models applicable to all modules and elements, which will be implemented in a case organization to showcase the framework's effectiveness and efficiency.

Summary

This chapter reviews existing literature on key elements of Knowledge Management (KM) that must be evaluated prior to implementing KM solutions The identified gaps in the literature have inspired the discussions presented in the subsequent chapters of this book.

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_3, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Introduction

To maximize the value of Knowledge Management (KM) within an organization, it is crucial to establish key pillars and dimensions that support its strategy The KM approach should translate into actionable initiatives across all sectors, focusing primarily on the creation, dissemination, and utilization of knowledge Strong support from various enablers is essential to achieve the intended outcomes, as illustrated in Fig 3.1.

The strategy stage for Knowledge Management (KM) begins with a thorough review of the organization's KM goals and objectives Understanding these objectives leads to the development of essential knowledge components necessary for achieving the organization's aims Following this, an opportunity and gap analysis is conducted alongside an assessment of knowledge maturity, which evaluates the organization's readiness by addressing three critical pillars of KM: people, process, and technology The goal is to integrate KM into business processes, fostering continuous improvement and promoting KM readiness A robust readiness review approach is essential for assessing and benchmarking these pillars holistically For further insights on organizational readiness, readers can consult the works of Chen and Huang (2007) and Mrayyan et al (2008) This comprehensive review ultimately determines the organization's capability to adopt effective KM practices.

To establish a clear sense of direction for Knowledge Management (KM) initiatives, it is crucial that readiness assessment outcomes guide organizational adaptations during implementation This research presents a comprehensive readiness assessment framework tailored for the Indian textile machinery manufacturing sector, while also generalizing the approach for the broader engineering manufacturing industry.

Research Gap Based on Literature

Effective implementation of knowledge management (KM) solutions in organizations necessitates a thorough readiness assessment of processes, people, and technology The main goal of this assessment is to develop a comprehensive framework and model tailored for KM solution implementation A detailed literature review highlights the existing research gap in this area, as illustrated in Fig 3.2.

Fig 3.1 Value chain of KM

Identification of sub-components of KM Pillars for organizational readiness for implementation of KM solution

Identification of impact weightage of sub-components of three KM pillars for organizational readiness for implementation of KM solution

Identification of the knowledge management ( KM ) pillars for organizational readiness

Research Process and Methodology

The readiness assessment framework, approach, and model for the implementation of KM solution are developed through this study

The research process is divided into two phases:

Phase 1 Identifi cation of KM pillars for readiness and development of readiness framework with subcomponents of KM pillars toward the implementation of KM solution

The phase 1 includes two steps:

Step 1 of Phase 1 – Identifi cation of KM pillars for readiness based on business and research literature

Step 2 of Phase 1 – Development of readiness framework with subcomponents of

KM pillars for organizational readiness through semistructured interview and

Phase 2 Subcomponent impact for readiness

The phase 2 includes one step:

Step 1 of Phase 2 – Identifi cation of impact weightage of subcomponents of three

KM pillars for organizational readiness of KM solution implementation through questionnaire-based survey

Organizations can utilize this process as a foundational framework to enhance their organizational readiness for knowledge management (KM) By focusing on the three core pillars of KM, they can assess the effects of both primary and secondary components on their readiness levels This approach aims to improve the overall preparedness for implementing effective KM solutions within the organization.

The research methodology used in the research process is detailed here:

In Phase 1, Step 1, organizations explore business and research literature to identify the key pillars of Knowledge Management (KM), aiming to gain a competitive advantage through reduced lead times, lower costs, and enhanced productivity The dynamic market landscape, characterized by globalization, rapid technological advancements, and a shortage of skilled human resources, necessitates a significant shift in strategy management In an unpredictable economy, knowledge emerges as the most reliable source of sustainable competitive advantage KM enhances organizational effectiveness by leveraging existing knowledge to strengthen core competencies Successful organizations continuously generate new knowledge, disseminate it effectively, and swiftly apply it to innovate technologies and products To thrive in this fast-paced environment, businesses must be responsive to customer needs, agile in operations, and focused on core competencies, supported by people, processes, and technology.

The research process and methodology are crucial for assessing an organization's preparedness for implementing Knowledge Management (KM) The three key pillars of KM serve as a foundational framework for manufacturing organizations, ensuring effective integration and application of knowledge practices.

In Phase 1, Step 2, a Delphi-based semistructured interview utilizing a structured questionnaire was employed to gather insights from employees across the organization This approach facilitated the identification and categorization of subcomponents related to the three key pillars of Knowledge Management (KM): people, process, and technology Insights were derived from a semistructured interview with 43 executives from 32 manufacturing organizations, leading to a clearer understanding of the computable characteristics of these pillars The critical subcomponents identified include: for people—skills, leadership, culture/structure, and exploitation; for process—processes, measures, explicit knowledge, and tacit knowledge; and for technology—knowledge centers and infrastructure Following the identification of these subcomponents, a comprehensive readiness assessment framework incorporating all three KM pillars was developed to enhance organizational readiness.

KM pillars and subcomponents of KM pillars should be derived in this step, and the derived framework based on 40 executives is depicted in Fig 3.4 :

People: skills, leadership, culture/structure, and exploitation – these address the

“mindset” and relate to attributes of assessing community and civilization People element also includes customers

Process: processes, measures, explicit knowledge, and tacit knowledge – these are the facilitators for people to strap up the knowledge in a standardized way across the organization

Technology: knowledge centers and infrastructure – these address the enablers and facilities which help people and process to bind the utmost out of the KM initiative

To effectively address an organization's knowledge management (KM) readiness, it is essential to recognize its time-dependent nature and the impact of changes in the fundamental subcomponents of the three critical pillars: people, process, and technology.

BASE - Sub components of people, process and technology

Fig 3.3 Pillars of KM for organizational readiness

T able 3.1 Sample template for semistructured intervie w and Delphi study No Kno wledge components Objecti v e Function/CSO Gap

The primary reasons for gaps in availability and accessibility include the high costs associated with materials, labor, and machinery Additionally, the lack of a structured database for financial and accounting information exacerbates these issues Implementing a comprehensive database solution can effectively address these gaps, improving overall operational efficiency.

X X Database – cost 2 Latest industry trends in accounting and costing Functional Finance and accounts Currently no structured data base is a v ailable that can pro vide such information

X X Industry analysis 3 Machine price data, application details, operations data, ratios Functional Finance and accounts Data, though a v ailable, is not captured or stored in a structured manner

X Product data base 4 Order to cash process, procure to pay process Functional Finance and accounts Processes not documented properly and not stored in a structured manner

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in finance are governed by various acts and state legislations, focusing on functional finance and accounts that are often not easily accessible The document library plays a crucial role in the classification of accounts, including capital and revenue, income and expenditure, as well as taxation data such as central excise, sales tax, and income tax, which are essential for effective tax reporting.

Functional Finance and accounts Data, though a v ailable, is not captured or stored in a structured manner

The X Records library serves as a valuable resource for management and technical institutes, focusing on functional finance and accounts However, key contact information is currently unavailable Additionally, the X Database offers access to a variety of technical newsletters, business articles, economic analyses, surveys, journals, periodicals, and annual reports, making it an essential tool for research and information dissemination in these fields.

Functional finance and accounts provide a centralized access point for all resources, which is not currently available The research process and methodology emphasize that the subcomponents under each pillar should be considered in the context of the organization It is essential to define appropriate subcomponents for various organizations and their readiness levels Any manufacturing organization can utilize this procedure to create a readiness assessment framework The generic readiness framework developed in this research serves as a foundational tool for any manufacturing entity.

In Step 1 of Phase 2, a weighted approach is utilized as a research methodology, assigning specific weightage to each survey question This weightage, combined with the number of participating executives, helps identify the proportional significance of the subcomponents of Knowledge Management (KM) pillars necessary for organizational readiness The survey consists of ten questions designed to quickly assess an organization's standing across ten subcomponents within three critical success pillars Scores are determined by calculating the mean and standard deviation of the response weightages, with the weightage for each subcomponent derived accordingly.

Weightage for each component Summation of the weightage of each compponent for all responses

Summation of maximum scale of each componennt for all responses ổ ốỗ ử ứữ

The weightage proportions for the various subcomponents of Knowledge Management (KM) pillars were determined based on a study involving 40 executives, with benchmark values illustrated in Figure 3.5 Additionally, the research design for the readiness assessment is outlined in Figure 3.6.

Explicit Knowledge Tacit Knowledge Processes Measures

Fig 3.4 Readiness assessment framework with KM pillars and subcomponents

Case Study Demonstration

This article presents a comprehensive research process and methodology illustrated through a case study of an Indian textile machinery manufacturing company As the second largest textile industry globally, India plays a crucial role in the sector, contributing to 38% of the nation's total exports, which amount to nearly $45 billion The textile industry stands as the foremost foreign exchange earner for the country, highlighting its significant economic importance.

Fig 3.5 Benchmark values for subcomponents based on questionnaire survey

Research design organizational readiness for KM solution

Step 1: Pillar and readiness framework

Step 2: Sub-component impact for readiness

Phase 1.2 Development of organizational readiness framework with sub components of KM Pillars based on semistructured interview and Delphi analysis

Phase 2.1 Identification of impact weightage of sub-components of three KM Pillars for organizational readiness of KM by questionnaire based survey

Phase 1.1: Identification of KM Pillars by Business and Research Literature

3.4 Case Study Demonstration for India Currently, it accounts for about 8 % of gross domestic product (GDP),

The industrial sector in India accounts for 20% of total production and over 30% of export earnings, playing a crucial role in the economy It directly employs around 38 million workers and indirectly supports an additional 54.85 million jobs, with 60% of these positions held by women This sector stands as the second largest provider of employment, following agriculture.

India is the second largest producer of cotton globally, contributing about 15% to the world's cotton textile production The country utilizes various fibers, including silk, jute, wool, and man-made materials With approximately 1,200 medium to large-scale textile mills, India boasts the second highest spindleage in the world, following China, with around 34 million cotton textile spindles dedicated to manufacturing cotton yarn.

India is home to 120 companies that manufacture a comprehensive range of textile machinery, contributing to a 3% share in global clothing export production The largest textile manufacturing states in India are Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, with the USA being the primary importer of Indian textiles India also has a significant market presence in countries such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Bangladesh, China, Turkey, and Japan Textile machinery plays a crucial role in the fabrication and processing of various woven and nonwoven materials, encompassing major segments like textile processing and working machinery These segments include fiber-to-fabric machinery, fabric machinery, and other essential textile machinery such as bleaching, dyeing, and finishing equipment, along with parts and accessories.

Established in 1962, the case organization is one of the three global manufacturers producing a complete range of textile machinery and is the leading manufacturer in India, holding a 60% market share in the spinning machinery sector Located in Tamil Nadu, South India, it was the first Indian company to launch the automatic bale plucking machine, setting a global benchmark While there are around 20 domestic competitors, major suppliers are primarily in northern India The Indian textile machinery sector exports approximately USD 80 million to developing countries, with global production of manufactured textile fiber projected to exceed 62 million metric tons by 2012, driven by demand in upholstery, household furnishings, apparel, and flooring Recent advancements also focus on medical textiles, geotextiles, agrotextiles, and protective textiles To boost productivity and enhance its market position, the case organization is implementing a Knowledge Management (KM) solution, although its traditional approach presents challenges in adapting to change.

39 understand the readiness of the organization toward the initiative of implementation of KM solution The readiness assessment model is devised for this case organization

In the implementation of the Knowledge Management (KM) solution for the case study organization, we focused on three key KM pillars derived from business and research literature These pillars were identified to enhance the organization's knowledge-sharing capabilities and drive effective decision-making processes.

The study identifies knowledge management (KM) pillars and develops a readiness assessment framework through semi-structured interviews and a Delphi study Weightage for the subcomponents of these KM pillars is determined via a questionnaire survey, involving a diverse group of respondents from various hierarchical levels, including members of the management committee, strategic top-level executives, and tactical and operational employees A total of 216 executives from a textile machinery manufacturing organization participated in the research.

The details of each phase of research process and methodology are explained for the case study

The same KM pillars such as people, process, and technology are leveraged for this case study based on business and research literature

The subcomponents were identified through a semistructured interview and Delphi analysis involving 216 executives, representing a random sample from a total of 700 employees The study was conducted over three rounds in a large auditorium, allowing for comprehensive discussions and evaluations The executives, ranging from entry-level to top management, participated in rating the questions, leading to the identification of key subcomponents outlined in Section 3.3 The final outcome of the readiness assessment framework for the case study is illustrated in Figure 3.7.

The impact weightage of the subcomponents are identifi ed based on questionnaire survey, and impact weightage is detailed in Fig 3.8

The ranks are transformed into relative percentages by dividing each rank by the total of all ranks within the group of measures or characteristics, mirroring the Pareto analysis method that converts problem frequencies into percentages to illustrate relative performance This percentage-based approach effectively emphasizes the differences in the significance of each characteristic The assessment reflects individual perceptions of knowledge management within their specific areas and serves as a foundation for planning and implementing knowledge management (KM) strategies in an organization Additionally, this assessment provides a snapshot of the organization's current standing concerning the essential pillars that contribute to KM Figure 3.9 illustrates the comparison between case study values and benchmark values.

Fig 3.7 Readiness assessment framework for the case study

Fig 3.8 Weightage for the case study

Managerial Implications

The outcome of the readiness assessment for textile machinery manufacturing orga- nization is:

A successful organization possesses a strong knowledge management (KM) vision and strategy, effectively championed by top management This strategy clearly outlines the role of KM in meeting organizational goals, as evidenced by leadership assessment results indicating a 50-60% effectiveness rate.

• Another aspect that is highlighted in the assessment outcome is that the organiza- tion has a fairly good technological infrastructure to support an initiative like

KM Even in the existing scenario, important information can be found/shared on the intranet

The organization effectively harnesses knowledge and experience, transforming them into projects and initiatives that drive growth.

The main challenge to knowledge management (KM) within the organization stems from the insufficient levels of explicit and tacit knowledge This indicates a lack of knowledge inventory and unclear ownership of knowledge resources, making them inaccessible across the organization Despite having a wealth of domain experts with critical knowledge, there is currently no effective system to codify, capture, or leverage this expertise for organizational benefit.

To enhance decision-making and business functions, it is essential to focus on knowledge centers that coordinate knowledge repositories and serve as central points for information provision The proposed Knowledge Management (KM) cell aims to effectively address this need.

Fig 3.9 Comparison of case study and benchmark values

The availability of both explicit and tacit knowledge is currently a weak area that requires immediate attention in knowledge management (KM) initiatives It is essential to prioritize the development of knowledge availability before addressing other subcomponents In contrast, leadership and technology are stronger areas that organizations can leverage to enhance their KM efforts and build momentum.

• Some of the other aspects that need attention from the KM initiative at the orga- nization would be:

(a) Measurement and management of intellectual capital in a systematic way, and publish regular reports to stakeholders

(b) Development of systematic process for gathering, organizing, exploiting, and protecting key knowledge assets

Fostering a culture of knowledge sharing across different departments is essential for organizational growth Additionally, it is crucial to identify and assign specific knowledge roles, ensuring that all senior managers and professionals receive training in knowledge management techniques.

The organization exhibits a positive attitude toward the Knowledge Management (KM) initiative, accompanied by high expectations To maintain this enthusiasm, it is essential to meet these expectations as fully as possible through effective implementation of KM strategies.

Conclusions

Effective Knowledge Management (KM) enables organizations to swiftly and accurately utilize their intellectual assets A crucial step in achieving successful KM is conducting a readiness assessment to evaluate the organization's knowledge "health." This evidence-based assessment identifies areas of focus before implementing KM initiatives, revealing the organization's needs, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, and risks Previous methodologies for readiness assessments have often been too general for specific company contexts This research proposes a systematic readiness assessment approach that evaluates the organization's KM awareness, analyzes knowledge support processes, structures, and roles, and identifies key business areas for KM initiatives Ultimately, this approach aids organizations in developing KM strategies aligned with their overall business strategies.

The organization can establish criteria for selecting relevant knowledge to pursue, enabling effective planning for capturing and sharing that knowledge Additionally, it can create a comprehensive knowledge management (KM) project plan, ensuring the allocation of necessary resources and personnel for successful implementation and monitoring of KM activities Despite its potential, KM remains in its early stages in India, with limited adoption across organizations.

43 companies have appointed dedicated personnel to take responsibility of KM

In many firms, knowledge management (KM) has been assigned as an additional responsibility to existing roles, leading to inadequate attention and care However, this approach is unsustainable in the face of India’s increasingly competitive business landscape KM has transitioned from being a luxury to an essential component for success.

Indian companies It is a necessity that can make all the difference between survival and an early demise

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Introduction

In the realm of Knowledge Management (KM), the most crucial component is "people," as the effectiveness of KM relies heavily on individuals' willingness to own, contribute, utilize, and share knowledge While processes and technology play a supportive role in facilitating KM, they ultimately serve to enhance the creation, sharing, and reuse of knowledge by individuals This highlights the fundamental principle that successful KM is driven by human behavior and readiness to engage with knowledge.

The behavior of individuals plays a crucial role in achieving organizational objectives, as highlighted by Krishnan (2001) Positive and appropriate behavior fosters the effective creation and utilization of collective knowledge within firms.

In the early stages of Knowledge Management (KM), organizations concentrated mainly on processes and technology, resulting in unproductive outcomes Despite significant investments in advanced systems, it became apparent that employees were hesitant to create, contribute, and share knowledge Consequently, the knowledge generated and stored was often underutilized, leading to the phenomenon known as the "KM graveyard."

Organizations recognize that their success in knowledge management (KM) initiatives largely depends on their people, making it crucial to foster a supportive organizational culture that promotes knowledge sharing and utilization This culture encompasses the shared values, beliefs, and attitudes held by employees, significantly influencing decision-making and behavior within the organization As organizations grow older and larger, their cultures become more entrenched, highlighting the intrinsic link between organizational culture and individual behavior in KM The culture reflects the organization's personality, homogeneity, and orientation, which facilitates effective management Key factors contributing to this culture include socialization and a selective hiring process that ensures a degree of personality alignment among employees.

Organizations utilize rewards to selectively reinforce desired behaviors, while promotion decisions often consider both performance and personality traits Therefore, at the beginning of the knowledge management (KM) journey, it is crucial to evaluate the values, attitudes, and behaviors of individuals within the organization, as these factors can create barriers to the effective seeking, sharing, and utilization of knowledge.

Research Gap Based on Literature

A holistic understanding of the structure, tasks, and personnel involved in organizational transformation is essential, as emphasized in the literature Employees play a crucial role in facilitating organizational changes, such as Knowledge Management (KM) The research gap identified through a comprehensive literature review is illustrated in Figure 4.1.

Understanding the various behavior types of employees within an organization, along with their respective proportions, is a crucial yet underexplored area in existing literature Assessing these behaviors is essential prior to implementing Knowledge Management (KM) solutions, as it helps set clear targets for improvement and fosters a more effective organizational environment.

To ensure the successful implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) solutions, organizations must initiate projects that focus on specific behavior targets identified through a behavior assessment This assessment aims to evaluate the existing behavior patterns of individuals within the organization regarding the adoption of KM solutions By understanding these patterns, organizations can design effective strategies that align with their unique needs, ultimately facilitating a smoother integration of KM practices.

Identify the distinct types of behavior effecting and affecting implementation of KM

Development of generic behavior assessment framework

Identification and setting of behavior targets for different types of behavior as key performance indicators in change management

The 4 Behavior Assessment framework is essential for implementing Knowledge Management Solutions in manufacturing organizations This framework outlines a generic procedure for evaluating behaviors, incorporating various behavior types and targets These types and targets are based on existing literature but can be adapted to align with the organization's specific mission and vision.

Research Process and Methodology

This study emphasizes the importance of profiling employees and analyzing their behaviors for a successful Knowledge Management (KM) initiative A comprehensive behavior assessment framework has been established, outlining specific behavior targets to guide the process.

The research process is divided into two phases:

Phase 1: Identifi cation of behavior types and behavior assessment.

Step 1 of Phase 1: Identifi cation of distinct types of behavior in an organization through semistructured interview with a structured questionnaire

Step 2 of Phase 1: Assessing the proportion of percentage of behavior types avail- able in the organization

Phase 2: Based on the behavior assessment, the behavior types are set to achieve the positive aspects of behavior in the organization

This methodology provides a foundational framework for organizations to identify and assess various behavior types within their workforce By determining the proportion of these behaviors, organizations can establish targeted goals aimed at enhancing positive behavior, ultimately facilitating the successful implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) practices.

The research methodology used in the research process is detailed here:

In Step 1 of Phase 1, a Delphi-based semistructured interview methodology, utilizing a structured questionnaire, is implemented to assess employee behavior types within the organization A generic questionnaire comprising five questions for each behavior type is administered to all employees If more than three responses affirmatively link to a specific behavior type, that behavior is deemed relevant to the organization Identifying these behavior types is crucial, as the "people factor" significantly influences the success or failure of knowledge management (KM) initiatives Based on existing research and business literature, six distinct behavior types are proposed for evaluation in this phase, with structured questions tailored to explore these categories during the semistructured interviews.

This research paper analyzes the behaviors of 43 executives from 32 manufacturing organizations, identifying six key behavior types that can serve as a foundational framework for any manufacturing entity The structured questions used in this study, along with their connection to these behavior types, are available upon request from the authors These six types encompass nearly all behavior patterns observed within the industry.

• Skeptic: People who do not believe things they are told or as others might believe

The person is of investigative nature (positive) on one hand and suspicious (nega- tive) on the other

• Convert: People who tend to accept an idea readily and are able to align them- selves easily

• Cynic: People who make things seem worse than they actually are and by nature they tend to denigrate or belittle everything

Procrastinators are individuals who delay tasks by making excuses, often claiming they have more important things to do They tend to wait indefinitely for the right mood to strike before finally tackling their responsibilities.

Individuals who recognize the significance of an idea often require guidance and motivation to engage fully Typically, these individuals are the creative and innovative trendsetters within an organization, playing a crucial role in driving progress and change.

• Rebel: People who love to be contrary and point out others’ fl aws unnecessarily They tend to value their own opinion above all else

In Step 2 of Phase 1, a weightage approach is utilized as a research methodology, assigning a specific weight to each question based on the preferences of top management on a scale of 1 to 10 This weightage helps determine the proportion of behavior types within the organization by linking the weight of each question to the number of points associated with each behavior type Additionally, it is essential to identify the total number of questions related to each behavior type in relation to the total number of employees in the organization.

If 50 out of 100 employees answer "yes" to question 1, which is associated with behavior type 1, then behavior type 1 receives a rating of 50% for that question When question 1 is scored as 6 out of 10, the overall score for behavior type 1 is calculated by multiplying the percentage rating by the scale score, resulting in a final score of 30%.

Likewise this should be done for all the questions related to each behavior type

To effectively assess and manage behavior types within an organization, if there are five questions related to a specific behavior, the average score for that behavior should be calculated In Phase 2, it is crucial to evaluate the proportion of each behavior type present in the organization and establish clear behavior targets for both employees and management The management should create dedicated teams to achieve these behavior targets, with distinct project charters developed for each target Additionally, a robust performance monitoring system, along with an effective communication plan and channels, should be implemented to ensure successful execution and control of the behavior targets.

The behavior targets for employees and management were established through a combination of business literature and interviews with 43 executives from 32 manufacturing organizations, ranging in size from 200 to over 20,000 employees This comprehensive study, which included both in-person and telephone interviews conducted according to a specific protocol, serves as a valuable resource for any manufacturing organization, as outlined in Table 4.1 After each interview, notes were analyzed to pinpoint potential challenges or issues, with the research design visually represented in Fig 4.2.

4 Behavior Assessment for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Table 4.1 Types of behavior with behavior targets

Convert Actively participate in the mentoring culture of the organization

Encourage peer-to-peer discussions and mentoring practices Assign them a coach or mentor to help them with development

Self-motivation Issue proper guidelines and instructions

Treat him as an internal customer and the new idea should be “sold” to him Cynic Avoid unrealistic expectations by having proper knowledge of policies of the company

To effectively manage expectations, it's crucial to be cautious about the promises made, as high expectations can drive engagement and effort, while unrealistic ones may lead to disillusionment and cynicism Conversely, low expectations often contribute to ideological cynicism Additionally, addressing conflict and negative emotions is essential for fostering a positive environment.

Effective communication is essential, as secrets and surprises can lead to cynicism This cynicism often masks an underlying inferiority complex To combat this, empowering individuals with ownership can foster positive change It’s crucial to ask the right questions regarding new initiatives and the organization’s strategies to ensure clarity and engagement.

To enhance organizational effectiveness, it is essential to prioritize middle managers as they play a crucial role in interacting with frontline employees and can be developed into knowledge engineers Additionally, fostering peer-to-peer discussions in well-organized small groups allows coworkers to effectively challenge the perceptions of ideological cynics, ensuring that participants are thoughtfully chosen to prevent the grouping of like-minded skeptics.

Involve the employees in the decision- making process whenever possible This takes forward the earlier point on ownership

Procrastinator Effective time management Map current time management skills of employees and techniques to avoid interruptions

Cultivating a "do it now" mindset is essential for enhancing productivity in the workplace and beyond Our motivational workshops emphasize effective time management and prioritization techniques, empowering participants to take immediate action By utilizing tools like LN for time management, individuals can streamline their tasks and focus on what truly matters Join us to transform your approach to work and life through actionable strategies that promote efficiency and success.

Eliminate indecision and hesitation Clarifi cation on expectations from the employees Cultivate the ability to prioritize and say NO

Case studies on time management goof-ups can be presented and discussed

Case Study Demonstration

Interpretations of Behavior Assessment

The interpretations of the behavior survey assessment of the case study are detailed below:

• It is clearly evident from the chart above that case study organization primarily has a convert and potential behavior type

The positive atmosphere within the case study organization is highly encouraging, indicating a strong foundation for knowledge management (KM) The presence of conversion and potential serves as crucial drivers for the successful implementation of KM strategies in any organization.

• However, though not highlighted, there is a signifi cant level of rebel, procrastina- tor, and cynic behavior types

Caution is essential as current behavioral trends may shift towards a negative environment if appropriate measures are not implemented to address various behavior types.

The following section will detail the behavior targets for employees and management, focusing on the five key behavior types identified within the case study organization.

Managerial Implications

According to Nelson and Quick (1994), individuals respond to change in various ways, including disengagement, disenchantment, disorientation, and disidentification Disengaged employees exhibit psychological withdrawal, showing a lack of initiative and interest while physically present but mentally absent Disenchanted employees express negativity and anger, often forming coalitions to voice their frustrations about the loss of the past Disoriented individuals feel lost and confused, wasting energy on questions rather than solutions, often experiencing "analysis paralysis." In contrast, those who disidentify feel their identity is threatened by change, clinging to familiar procedures for a sense of security DeMeuse and McDaris (1994) further categorize reactions to change into "change agents," "change compliers," and "change challengers," aligning with the profiles established by Nelson and Quick.

4 Behavior Assessment for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

The current state of India's manufacturing industry indicates a promising opportunity for positive change A literature review reveals that employees' resistance to knowledge management (KM) is primarily rooted in fundamental emotional factors.

• Lack of trust on the management

• Feeling of losing one’s power as an expert

Lewin (1939) identifies three essential approaches for organizations to effectively manage change: the rational empirical approach, which focuses on educating employees about the necessity of change; the normative educative approach, which emphasizes the importance of social norms and values; and the power coercive approach, which relies on authority and pressure to implement change.

Thus, the climate setting for change can happen through a series of systematic well-defi ned steps, like:

Step 1: Creating strategic vision and mission for the employees

In this phase, behavior targets are established by utilizing best practices and benchmark studies, including the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model and other relevant resources The identification of behavior targets for both employees and management is conducted for each specific type of behavior, serving as key performance indicators through the balanced scorecard to ensure the effective implementation of Knowledge Management (KM).

Step 3: Use these targets for performance appraisals

The essence of management strategies can be summarized in a 5-step PRIDE model suggested as follows:

• R ecognize, reinforce, and reward everyone’s efforts

These steps would ensure contented employees who would work toward for a better future promising better productivity in any turbulent changes.

Summary

Knowledge Management (KM) is utilized to boost performance by refining business processes, under the premise that while immediate measurable benefits may be limited, long-term performance enhancements will ultimately yield significant advantages Most KM research has focused on forward-looking organizations, positing that today's changes will gradually translate into improved performance over time.

The 56 assessment model is a comprehensive framework designed to evaluate behavior types within an organization It establishes specific behavior targets for both employees and management, facilitating the effective implementation of Knowledge Management (KM).

This research bridges the gap between industry and academia by developing a structured knowledge management (KM) initiation method and identifying factors that hinder its successful implementation, enhancing productivity in knowledge work By incorporating an interdisciplinary perspective and practical insights from applied behavioral psychology, this study enriches the existing literature on KM initiation However, limitations include the exclusive focus on respondents from the manufacturing sector, suggesting that future studies should explore other industries and utilize larger, more diverse samples to enhance statistical significance Despite these constraints, key insights emerge, particularly the importance of profiling employees to identify potential change agents and formulate effective strategies for strategic management, which can facilitate positive and productive KM initiation and organizational transformation.

4 Behavior Assessment for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_5, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Introduction

Enterprises are increasingly recognizing the significance of understanding their internal knowledge and leveraging it effectively This knowledge is dispersed across various locations, including databases, knowledge bases, filing cabinets, and individual expertise Frequently, different departments within an enterprise duplicate efforts due to the challenges of tracking and utilizing knowledge from other areas To enhance efficiency and innovation, organizations must prioritize knowledge management strategies.

• What their knowledge assets are

• How to manage and make use of these assets to get maximum return

Traditional company policies often prioritize tangible assets while neglecting crucial knowledge assets, which are vital for success in a competitive marketplace The effectiveness of key business processes, such as supply chain management and product development, hinges on the quality of knowledge applied across various domains, including raw materials, planning, consumer needs, and emerging technologies As Albert Einstein noted, "Knowledge is experience Everything else is just information," emphasizing the importance of experiential knowledge, while The Bhagavad Gita reminds us that "The wise see Knowledge and Action as one," highlighting the need for actionable insights in business strategies.

Knowledge Management (KM) involves not just the management of knowledge assets but also the processes that interact with these assets, such as development, preservation, utilization, and sharing Essentially, KM enables organizations to create and leverage knowledge to meet their objectives It serves as a critical business process for firms to harness their collective knowledge effectively Furthermore, organizational learning plays a vital role in enhancing a firm's productivity growth Research indicates that while information and communication technology is essential, it alone cannot foster organizational learning or boost productivity Notably, certain computer-based systems have been shown to facilitate organizational learning, particularly in manufacturing companies, highlighting the importance of a structured approach to knowledge management.

Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution

Taxonomy serves as a standardized framework for categorizing all functional aspects of an enterprise, reflecting how organizations conceptualize their business operations and customer delivery By organizing information hierarchically, taxonomy simplifies the identification of related terms, facilitating easier navigation between general and specific categories This standardization enhances user experience by creating consistent connections between concepts and their corresponding terminology Based on insights from semi-structured interviews, expert opinions, and a Delphi study, we propose a generic taxonomy architecture framework tailored for manufacturing organizations, ensuring extensibility to accommodate non-document outputs Ultimately, an organizational structure embodies a hierarchical framework where entities collaborate towards a common goal.

Taxonomy is a standardized hierarchical system used to categorize information and knowledge, reflecting how businesses operate and deliver services to customers By organizing terms in a structured manner, taxonomy clarifies relationships and facilitates the discovery of related items at various levels of specificity It establishes consistent terminology, linking concepts to their descriptions, which enhances user experience by simplifying the search process Ultimately, taxonomy serves as the foundational operational framework of an enterprise, encompassing all functional aspects and ensuring extensibility to include non-document outputs.

Research Gap Based on Literature

A holistic understanding of taxonomy and technology architecture is essential for successful organizational transformation, as emphasized in existing literature These elements play a critical role in facilitating effective organizational change.

The literature review reveals a significant research gap in knowledge management (KM), particularly in the development of a taxonomy architecture that encompasses both structured and unstructured knowledge Key areas that require further exploration include the creation of a navigation and content layer, metadata development, and the establishment of a comprehensive technology architecture This architecture should address functional requirements, administrative and operational features, architectural integration, user interface and navigation elements, security measures, as well as documentation and support features essential for effective KM implementation within organizations.

This taxonomy and technology architecture is very important for a manufacturing organization before the implementation of KM solution Based on the development

To successfully implement a Knowledge Management (KM) solution, organizations must prioritize the design of taxonomy and technology architecture, focusing on both process and structure This foundational framework is essential for developing an effective KM portal The aim of this approach is to create a versatile conceptual framework and design that can be adapted to any manufacturing organization Additionally, the components of taxonomy and technology architecture are informed by existing literature and can be tailored to align with the organization’s specific mission and vision.

Research Process and Methodology

The research process and methodology for the development of framework for tax- onomy and technology architecture is detailed The research process is divided into three phases:

Phase 1: Development of taxonomy architecture for structured and unstructured knowledge

Phase 2: Development of metadata defi nition for taxonomy architecture

Phase 3: Development of technology architecture with all functional requirements, administrative/operational features, architectural features, integration features, user interface and navigation features, security features and documentation, and help features

Develop the taxonomy architecture for structured and unstructured knowledge

Develop the technology architecture with all functional requirements, administrative / operationsl features, architectural features, integration features, user interface and navigation features, security feautures and documentation and help features

Develop the metadata definition for taxonomy architecture

The research methodology used in the research process is detailed here:

In Phase 1, a comprehensive brainstorming session utilizing the Delphi method was conducted, focusing on a pre-defined taxonomy architecture informed by business literature, research studies, individual consultations, and validation from academic experts in the field.

A Delphi-based brainstorming exercise involving 43 executives from 32 manufacturing organizations was conducted to develop a comprehensive methodology for knowledge management (KM) This process included discussions with 26 academic experts from 14 leading institutions across India, along with insights from 13 consultants from four different consulting firms The resulting taxonomy architecture serves as a foundational framework applicable to any manufacturing organization The detailed taxonomy architecture is outlined in Section 5.4, demonstrating its alignment with the generic taxonomy architecture derived for the specific case study organization.

The research methodology for Phases 2 and 3 closely follows the approach established in Phase 1 This includes the development of pre-defined metadata, technology architecture, and a comprehensive set of functional requirements Key components such as administrative and operational features, architectural elements, integration capabilities, user interface and navigation design, security measures, as well as documentation and help resources, are all crafted using the same methodological framework as outlined in Phase 1.

Section 5.4 outlines the comprehensive metadata definition and technology architecture, encompassing all functional requirements, administrative and operational features, architectural elements, integration capabilities, user interface and navigation components, security measures, as well as documentation and support features This section highlights that the generic framework and designs are consistent with those developed for the case study organization.

The diagrammatic representation of research design is detailed in Fig 5.2

Case Study Demonstration

Taxonomy Architecture

The taxonomy architecture knowledge for case study organization was identifi ed for both explicit/structured knowledge as well as tacit/unstructured knowledge

5 Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution…

5.4.1.1 Taxonomy Architecture for Structured Knowledge

The taxonomy for structured knowledge is divided into two main layers: the navigation layer and the content layer The navigation layer serves as the access path for users to find information categories, while the content layer provides a structured format for storing and retrieving relevant data Detailed representations of the navigation layer and its balanced scorecard perspective are illustrated in Figures 5.3 and 5.4 Additionally, the content layer corresponding to the navigation taxonomy elements is elaborated in Figures 5.5 through 5.24 The following sections will explore the different layers of the taxonomy as they apply to the case study organization.

Delphi based detailed brainstorming exercise with a pre-intended framework and designed which is derived based on individual discussions and face validity is the methodology for the below three modules

Development of the taxonomy architecture for structured and unstructured knowledge

Development of technology architecture with all functional requirements, administrative / operational features, architectural features, integration features, user interface and navigation features, security feautures and documentation and help features

Development of metadata definition for taxonomy architecture

Fig 5.2 Research process and methodology

Fig 5.3 Navigation layer for taxonomy architecture of KM

Perspective Customer Perspective Internal Perspective

Fig 5.4 Navigation layer with balanced scorecard perspective

5 Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution…

5.4.1.2 Taxonomy Architecture for Unstructured Knowledge

In the case study organization, various channels of interaction among employees hold significant knowledge that should be systematically extracted and documented It is essential to focus on these channels to effectively capture and codify the valuable insights they contain.

• Communities of practices/interest (organizational learning)

• Business and technical review meetings

Balanced Scorecard Database Company Policies

Total Productive Maintenance Database News Letters

Fig 5.5 Content layer for corporate taxonomy

Fig 5.6 Content layer for secretarial taxonomy

Fig 5.7 Content layer for internal audit taxonomy

Fig 5.8 Content layer for quality assurance taxonomy

Fig 5.9 Content layer for fi nance and accounts taxonomy

Fig 5.10 Content layer for information technology taxonomy

The knowledge gathered through these channels will be linked to at least one item in the previously identified structured taxonomy Additionally, unstructured knowledge will be codified to encapsulate essential insights.

Queries: Answers and clarifi cations – This describes the queries/questions related to an item and the answers or clarifi cation made available during these interac- tions on the channel:

1 Reference to other relevant structured knowledge components and industry benchmarks

2 Uniqueness of the query or situation to be highlighted

Symptoms: Root and cause (problems) – These are the set of observations discussed on a knowledge item feature with respect to its operational behavior, effi ciency

Fig 5.11 Content layer for HRD taxonomy

Fig 5.12 Content layer for personnel taxonomy

5 Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution…

Best Practices in SCM Negotiation Tips

Fig 5.13 Content layer for SCM taxonomy

Fig 5.14 Content layer for foundry-production taxonomy

68 characteristics, etc In addition this would involve identifi cation of the root cause for these observations, if discussed during the interactions in the channel:

• Information on the surrounding environmental factors, confi guration param- eters, and associated other happenings

• Domain-specifi c infl uence and related information

Fig 5.15 Content layer for foundry-sales taxonomy

Best Practices in MTD Safety Guidelines New Initiatives

Fig 5.16 Content layer for MTD-manufacturing taxonomy

5 Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution…

The channel focuses on various issues and concerns related to specific items, often discussing them with designated organizational experts or informal specialists Responses typically provide resolutions or direct individuals to the appropriate expert or knowledge center for further assistance.

(ii) Associate in different functional areas or domains if applicable

Fig 5.17 Content layer for MTD-sales taxonomy

Fig 5.18 Content layer for MTD-R&D taxonomy

Fig 5.19 Content layer for planning taxonomy

Fig 5.20 Content layer for manufacturing taxonomy

5 Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution…

Fig 5.21 Content layer for spare parts section taxonomy

Exports Database Best Practices in Sales

Fig 5.22 Content layer for sales taxonomy

Tips and suggestions often circulate informally through emails and chats, serving as valuable insights for knowledge items within a specific functional area These pieces of information may be supported or challenged by other knowledge workers who provide relevant feedback, enhancing the overall understanding and effectiveness of the shared knowledge.

1 Support with testifi ed data or benchmarked industry source

There are specifi c templates with respect to these unstructured knowledge items that can be used for any knowledge items across different service lines and vertical domains

Fig 5.23 Content layer for customer service division taxonomy

Fig 5.24 Content layer for R&D taxonomy

5 Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution…

Metadata

Metadata refers to data that provides information about other data, typically describing a single resource This structured and encoded data highlights the characteristics of information-bearing entities, facilitating their identification, discovery, assessment, and management By employing metadata in searches, users can enhance their resource discovery process, utilizing parameters such as time period, knowledge category, author, and title This approach allows standard queries to be processed with contextual relevance, ultimately saving users from the need for complex manual filtering For further details, refer to Table 5.1, which outlines the applicable metadata across the taxonomy defined in Section 5.4.1.

Technology Architecture

Technology architecture for case study organization is devised and detailed in Fig 5.25 This section also discusses in detail the functional requirements and

Table 5.1 Metadata defi nition of taxonomy architecture

S/No Attribute name Attribute type Remarks

1 Title Text Title of the document

2 Author Text Who wrote the document

3 Brief/abstract Text Brief description on the document

4 Categories Multiple value Category is the taxonomy navigation and basically will contain the elements as specifi ed in the navigation layer of the taxonomy

5 Process Text From which process this knowledge item was created

This document will contribute to various corporate strategic objectives (CSOs) as outlined in the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Users will be able to select from a dropdown list of specified CSOs, ensuring alignment with the organization's strategic goals.

7 Subject Multiple value List of domains like textile machinery, machine tools, fi nance, and HR

8 Focus area Multiple value Related focus areas like business, technical, management, general, and training

9 Customer Text This property is optional If the document is related with customer, we can specify the customer name

10 Understanding Text The document related to novice, expert, all, etc

11 Rating Numeric The weightages for the document

12 Keywords Multiple value The search keywords for the document

13 Activities Multiple value To which activity this knowledge item is related

14 Form Text In what form the knowledge is captured doc, audio, video

15 Sensitivity Single select To what level the document is secured for access

16 Type Text What is the type of knowledge item ,e.g., report, best practice, and manual

17 Last revised Date Last modifi ed

74 features for the KM system The requirements are classifi ed under the following categories and the same are discussed in detail:

The functional features and description of functional features are detailed

Taxonomy: Creation of multiple knowledge repositories and sub-repositories (typi- cally, each repository would be an area of relevance to the businesses) Option for

Information Storage Process Management Applications

Integration (EAI, Web Services, XML etc.)

Communities of Practice and Interest

Fig 5.25 Technology architecture for KM

5 Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution… customization of taxonomy in order to dynamically adopt the changing require- ments of the organization

Clustering search offers a fast, reliable, and precise method for searching and retrieving information Users can easily navigate through relevant categories, receiving a comprehensive list of options to specify their desired choice This approach includes both wildcard and keyword-guided searches, as well as menu-driven navigation for distributed data, documents, and various sources.

Active filtering allows users to manually create filters and highlight interesting content for sharing within their group, while automated filtering employs statistical algorithms to recommend content based on the correlation between individual preferences and content ratings These content ratings are generated automatically by analyzing the average time readers spend engaging with each item.

Each month, we proudly highlight our Contributor of the Month, showcasing the image and name of a key individual who significantly enhances our knowledge repository This recognition is based on automated statistical algorithms that evaluate contributions through various parameters, including the quantity and quality of submissions, as well as active participation in unstructured channels.

Highlight the "User of the Month" by showcasing the image and name of a significant contributor to the knowledge repository This selection is driven by automated statistical algorithms that analyze parameters such as information usage and engagement in unstructured channels to provide tailored recommendations.

Integrative and structured knowledge serves as a shared platform for group members to exchange, view, and contribute their insights It encompasses a collection of distributed knowledge repositories that include both explicated databases and explicitly captured content, such as discussions and visual materials By providing a structured knowledge discovery facility, it facilitates the transfer of information from organized sources to individuals When effectively implemented, this system can significantly enhance a corporate sensory network, offering valuable insights into business operations through transactional interactions with customers, partners, and employees.

Interactive/unstructured knowledge: Interaction among people and providing basic platform for people to share the tacit knowledge through various channels like:

4 E-mail integration (subject to security policies)

1 Virtual meeting room combines several forms of real-time communication, including voice over Internet protocol(IP), chat, and instant messaging These forms are used to transfer knowledge from one person to another person or within small groups Knowledge transfer using virtual meeting room is lost, much as it is with the telephone, because the participants never place a transcript or other record of their conversation in a repository

2 Discussion thread: It can facilitate brainstorming and can act as a codifi cation point for insights and lessons learned, and they can act as the tool through which distributed teams interact Discussion threads must focus on the inquisitive dia- log In addition, discussion threads should be seen as a component of many of the other transfer technologies Any real-time interaction, teaching session, or course should add a discussion thread that allows for asynchronous discussion to supplement the other interactions

3 Electronic whiteboard: It supports the transfer of knowledge by allowing an instructor or peer to work out ideas on a shared white space All members of the session may see the person work and in some cases may also collaborate, thereby transferring knowledge through peer/instructor interaction

4 E-mail integration: It is a fl exible, adaptive tool for the transfer of information and knowledge E-mail is a private medium, however, so the learning that takes place between e-mail participants does so in a relatively private way The only way knowledge is transferred on a larger scale is for the participants to decide to publish e-mail content or forward it to other people

5 Videoconferencing: It has two modes One, the speaker presentation mode, works well as a starting point for knowledge transfer in a lecture format, but if there are many participants, questions are better taken over the phone than through the video system because of the diffi culties of managing windows and cameras If the videoconferencing is also being used with video streaming, it is better for the audience and for the speaker to choose a single method of interac- tion, since some participants will not have cameras The second mode is person- to- person or small-group-to-small-group interchanges where video can enhance the communication of knowledge by enhancing the overall bandwidth of the human interaction (facial expressions, body language, etc.) Videoconferencing in this mode is best when it is person-to-person and can be a very good supple- ment to mentoring if the mentor and student are not in the same location It is also a good way to reduce travel when skill transfer is required because it not only allows people to communicate but it can also establish a relationship between the parties more quickly and with higher quality than phone, e-mail, or real-time chat

Organizational learning involves the systematic detection and correction of errors within a group, enabling teams to respond consistently to various stimuli A well-structured system should effectively showcase this learning process, highlighting the importance of collaboration and shared experiences in fostering growth and improvement.

3 Learning from external/new environment

Mapping an organization's expertise is crucial as it facilitates easy access to knowledge, enabling quicker connections between individuals seeking guidance This streamlined access leads to faster response times and minimizes the risk of rework Additionally, expertise maps can be utilized to engage the right people for assistance on ongoing projects, enhancing collaboration and efficiency.

To enhance knowledge management solutions, organizations should focus on training employees who already possess foundational skills, equipping them with the advanced capabilities necessary for future projects Key considerations in this process include evaluating employees' skills, expertise, experience, and geographical location to ensure effective training and development.

Some additional requirements in the same context are capability to provide links to “experts” in each repository/sub-repository and capability to post ideas/questions for experts

Best practice sharing: The system should enable identifi cation of best practices, documentation of best practices, and easy sharing of best practices

News fl ash: Provide a quick idea of what is happening in the business environment internally and externally like business interest items, industry analysis, highlights, and lowlights

What’s new?: “What’s new” button that displays new content added during, say, the last 2 weeks

The administrative/operational features and description of administrative/opera- tional features are detailed

Effective management of the KM site requires the webmaster to oversee the KM system and its repositories from a central point The administrator must actively monitor user activity to prevent hacking attempts and block access from suspicious users Additionally, the administrator should be granted specific rights to ensure robust security and efficient management of the system.

Summary

The generic taxonomy and technology architecture developed in this research serve as a foundational framework for manufacturing industries to establish effective knowledge management (KM) solutions By focusing on various components, practice managers can enhance business processes, safeguard intellectual property, and ensure compliance It is essential for each organization to create a unique taxonomy tailored to its specific processes, organizational structures, core competencies, and historical context.

5 Taxonomy and Technology Architecture for Knowledge Management Solution…

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_6, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Introduction

Multinational companies are increasingly focusing on initiatives to improve the capture, storage, and dissemination of knowledge and information The primary goals of these initiatives include identifying and analyzing existing and needed knowledge assets, as well as the processes associated with them This strategic approach enables organizations to effectively plan and control actions aimed at developing both their knowledge assets and processes to achieve their overall objectives.

In an organizational context, data consists of facts and values that illustrate results and relationships These relationships can transform data into meaningful information, while patterns within data and information can lead to the formation of knowledge For this representation to be useful, it must be comprehended; once understood, it becomes information or knowledge for the individual who grasps it.

Knowledge Management (KM) is a strategic process that enables organizations to derive value from their intellectual and knowledge-based assets This value generation typically involves sharing knowledge among employees, departments, and external partners to establish best practices While information technology (IT) often supports KM initiatives, it is important to note that technology alone does not constitute KM.

Knowledge assets encompass the essential information about markets, products, technologies, and organizations that a business must possess to enhance its processes and drive profitability Effective knowledge management (KM) involves not only the oversight of these assets but also the management of processes related to knowledge development, preservation, utilization, and sharing.

Effective implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) relies on a well-structured knowledge organization and is supported by incentive plans and attractive reward programs To enhance KM practices, many organizations appoint roles such as Chief Knowledge Officer (CKO), knowledge engineers, and knowledge analysts.

Process Design for Knowledge Management

Knowledge managers and knowledge stewards play a crucial role in administering knowledge management (KM) With the advancement of information technology (IT), KM systems have been seamlessly integrated into organizational structures, facilitating effective knowledge management through intranet and internet platforms.

Research Gap Based on Literature

The need for having a holistic view about the process design, reward design, and communication plan in organizational transformation is highlighted in literature

All three designs play a crucial role in facilitating organizational change, particularly in Knowledge Management (KM) The research gap identified through a comprehensive literature review is illustrated in Figure 6.1.

The article focuses on the development of a comprehensive process design for effective knowledge management (KM), which includes knowledge capture, storage, retrieval, and administration It outlines the creation of a key performance indicator framework and an organizational structure that defines roles and responsibilities for KM Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of a reward design featuring an incentive plan and metrics, as well as a strategic communication plan to enhance organizational knowledge sharing and collaboration.

The implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) solutions is often underexplored in existing literature A well-structured process design, along with a robust reward and communication strategy, is essential for organizations prior to adopting KM initiatives Effective planning in these areas significantly contributes to the successful development and execution of KM processes.

Develop the process design for the knowledge capture, knowledge storage, knowledge retrieval and knowledge administration

Develop the organization structure with roles and responsibilities Develop the key performance indicator framework

Develop the reward program design with incentive plan and metrics

Develop the communication plan design with all relevant phases

Effective process design for Knowledge Management (KM) solution implementation requires a strategic focus on learning, along with the development of connections between internal and external organizational functions Without this focus, KM solution implementation may fail The main goal of the process design, reward, and communication plan is to establish a strong foundation for KM, essential for successful implementation within any organization.

The KM portal aims to establish a versatile conceptual framework and design for process design, reward systems, and communication strategies tailored for manufacturing organizations Factors influencing process design are sourced from existing literature and can be adapted to align with the organization's unique mission and vision.

Research Process and Methodology

The research process for developing a framework for process design, reward plans, and communication strategies is outlined in detail and consists of five distinct phases.

Phase 1: Development of process design for the knowledge capture, knowledge storage, knowledge retrieval, and knowledge administration

Phase 2: Development of key performance indicator framework

In Phase 3, we focus on establishing the organizational structure by defining clear roles and responsibilities Phase 4 involves creating a comprehensive reward program that includes an incentive plan and measurable metrics to drive performance Finally, Phase 5 is dedicated to designing an effective communication plan that encompasses all relevant phases to ensure transparency and alignment within the organization.

The research methodology used in the research process is detailed here:

In Phase 1, a Delphi-based brainstorming exercise was conducted to develop a pre-intended process design informed by business and research literature, expert discussions, and face validity assessments This methodology involved 43 executives from 32 manufacturing organizations and consultations with 26 academic experts from 14 leading institutions across India, along with 13 consultants from four different consulting firms The resulting process design serves as a foundational framework applicable to any manufacturing organization, with the details outlined in Section 6.4, demonstrating the alignment between the generic process design and the specific design tailored for the case study organization.

The research methodology for Phases 2 through 5 mirrors that of Phase 1, incorporating a consistent approach to developing the key performance indicator framework, organizational structure with defined roles and responsibilities, reward design with an incentive plan and metrics, and a communication plan.

The devised key performance indicator framework, organizational structure with roles and responsibilities, reward design with incentive plan and metrics, and

84 communication plan design are presented in Sect 6.4 because the generic framework and designs and the framework and design derived for the case study organization are the same

The diagrammatic representation of research design is detailed in Fig 6.2

Case Study Demonstration

Process Design Development

This section outlines the essential Knowledge Management (KM) processes that the case study organization must implement to meet its KM goals and objectives These processes focus on four key areas critical to any KM initiative: knowledge capture, knowledge storage, knowledge retrieval, and knowledge administration.

Capturing existing knowledge is a crucial initial step in knowledge management (KM) within manufacturing organizations The processes for knowledge capture can be categorized into three areas: structured knowledge, document workflow, and unstructured knowledge Structured knowledge involves defining methods to capture and store organized information, ensuring easy retrieval whenever needed The design of the process environment for structured knowledge is illustrated in Figure 6.3.

Knowledge management (KM) tools enable users to upload and categorize content using specific attributes, which facilitate selective searches To effectively capture and store structured knowledge in a KM repository, various methods for collecting content can be employed Implementing a systematic procedure for this process is essential for optimal organization and retrieval.

A user can submit a document to Knowledge Management (KM) via offline methods like email for uploading The KM administrator will then review the document and upload it after assigning the necessary attributes.

KM repository Review / Approval Process

Send document to KM administrator by E-Mail

Fig 6.3 Process environment design – structured knowledge

The content upload workflow for 86 management tools includes a contribution section that identifies the categories for knowledge items and the associated attributes from users uploading documents to the system.

End users can upload content directly into the Knowledge Management (KM) system Depending on licensing agreements, users submit their content through the document management tool's upload workflow The content will be published only after receiving approval from an expert or KM administrator.

The KM repository can directly collect data from various applications, making it accessible for search and retrieval in accordance with security policies This data, whether stored in internal application databases or external links, requires the KM system to communicate with these databases to retrieve information as needed.

The workflow process is designed to assist the knowledge management administrator in ensuring that knowledge items are accessible when needed For a comprehensive understanding of the document workflow process, please refer to the "document workflow" section.

Key roles involve KM administrator, KM expert, and user

The document workflow is essential for ensuring that user-contributed knowledge items undergo a thorough review and approval process before being published on the Knowledge Management (KM) site Contributions submitted through the designated section are systematically routed through this workflow, which involves collaboration between experts and KM administrators.

Experts will review submitted documents in the KM site’s expert section for approval Each category has a designated expert who can access relevant documents The expert has the ability to approve or reject submissions with provided reasons, update profile information, and modify category assignments.

Once a knowledge item receives expert approval, it awaits publication by the KM administrator for display on the KM site The administrator has the ability to publish the item, reject it with a specified reason, modify profile values, and change its categories.

Key roles involve KM administrator and KM expert The process environment for administrator is explained in Fig 6.4

Unstructured knowledge refers to the method of capturing and storing information exchanged through informal channels like chats and discussion forums This process ensures that such knowledge can be easily retrieved whenever needed and is readily accessible for searches across the Knowledge Management (KM) site.

Employee chat is an essential online communication tool that facilitates various chat formats, including many-to-many, one-to-many (expert chats), and one-to-one interactions To ensure security and integrity, all participants must undergo authentication before entering the chat Additionally, moderation is required for all chat sessions, and any user has the option to request a chat.

6 Process Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Fig 6.4 Process environment design – administrator

Conversion of Chat transcript to FAQ/Tips

Fig 6.5 Process environment design – employee chat

The KM administrator schedules and manages chats based on user requests or independently, inviting users to participate As the chat owner, they initiate discussions at the designated time and notify invited participants A feature should allow for the creation of knowledge items from chat transcripts, which are then stored in the KM repository with relevant tags and security settings Additionally, the administrator can develop FAQs or tips from these transcripts, enabling experts to select and edit questions for inclusion in new documents or resources The design of the process environment for employee chat is illustrated in Fig 6.5.

Discussion forums serve as a bulletin board service where the Knowledge Management (KM) administrator can create and manage forums within specific domains and sub-domains The administrator has the ability to modify the user list at any time and can initiate new discussion topics, as well as approve or reject topic requests submitted by users Assigned users can contribute their perspectives on these topics, leading to ongoing threads that include replies and further discussions among participants.

Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Design

The KM administrator plays a crucial role in monitoring the performance of the Knowledge Management (KM) process by regularly tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) Utilizing the reporting features of the KM system, the administrator generates specific reports that are subsequently analyzed and presented to management This analysis serves as vital input for informed decision-making and facilitates continuous improvements and adjustments to the KM process.

The KPIs that need to be tracked for KM are:

(a) Number of log-ins into the KM portal

(b) Number of hits per section/subsection

(c) Number of views/downloads per knowledge item

2 Corporate strategic objective (CSO)-related KPIs:

(a) Number of documents related to each of the CSOs

(b) Exception reports for tracking CSO which do not have any knowledge items or have consistently low (less than 5 per month) knowledge inputs

(a) Number of reviews/approvals by the expert

(b) Number of pending reviews/approvals

(c) Mean time taken by the expert to review and approve a document

4 Signifi cant contributors/users for a period and what are their contributions In this context signifi cant contributors/users would be the fi rst 15 top-rated con- tributors/users

5 User names with names and dates of visit to the site, who has read/downloaded which knowledge item

Management should establish specific targets for each KPI, utilizing guidelines to initiate measures effectively Prior to launching, ensure a balanced distribution of knowledge items across all sections, with a minimum of three documents per CSO in each section This serves as a preliminary measure; actual targets should align with the manufacturing organization's corporate goals After three months of operation, evaluate performance against the KPIs and refine them based on observed data Set more precise targets at this stage and ensure regular tracking and monthly reporting of KPIs Additionally, refine the KPIs every six months to maintain alignment with organizational priorities.

KM Organization Structure Design

Effective knowledge management (KM) recognizes that the expertise of an organization’s employees is crucial for success, necessitating a transition from a technical focus to a more people-oriented approach This shift emphasizes not only the processes that facilitate effective information sharing but also the personal qualities required for effective facilitation and communication For the successful implementation and sustainability of KM initiatives, a well-defined organizational structure with clear roles and responsibilities is essential Based on the specific operational context of the case study organization, a tailored knowledge organization structure is recommended to enhance its KM efforts.

6 Process Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

The roles discussed in the proposed KM organization structure are:

1 Chief knowledge offi cer (CKO)

All the above roles are rotational roles having a minimum tenure of 18 months and a maximum tenure of 36 months The KM organization structure is detailed in Fig 6.11

The roles and responsibilities for the different designations as defi ned in the above

KM organization chart are described below

Roles and responsibilities of chief knowledge offi cer (CKO):

• Providing overall vision, broad policy direction, and guidance to the KM core team at case study organization

• Overseeing the establishment, implementation, and evaluation of case study organization’s KM program

• Monitoring the KM activities of the offi ces, divisions, and units to ensure that the occupational priorities are addressed along with critical initiatives of knowledge throughout case study organization

• Coordinating with case study organization KM manager to identify, select, assign, and evaluate the results of KM pilot activities

• Forming and chairing the organization KM steering committee

• Program managing all organization-wide KM activities

• Implementing “rewards and incentives plan.”

• Conducting an annual program review of results, lessons learned, and improve- ments in case study organization KM program activities

• Measuring the impact of KM on the business

• Defi ning case study organization KM policies, procedures, and guidelines

• Budgeting and managing the funds allocated for organization-wide KM activities

• CKO must think holistically and strategically and must be able to convincingly communicate the value of KM to skeptical audiences

Roles and responsibilities of KM administrator:

• Supporting the conduct and evaluation of KM pilot activities

• Developing, overseeing, and conducting training on all aspects of KM

• Serving as the staff liaison between the case study organization KM community of practice and the KM steering committee

• Monitoring “rewards and incentives plan.”

• Conducting focus groups and other appropriate activities to determine case study organization KM needs

• Communication on KM pilot projects and development efforts to KM managers for incorporation in their respective areas

• Maintaining and updating the case study organization KM portal These include the following:

KM Manager (Corporate) KM Manager (TMD) KM Manager (MTD)

Organization Level / Dedicated resources working full-time on KM

Corporate Level / Working Part-time on KM from among the business heads

Functional Level / Working Part-time on KM from among the functional staff.

Shop Floor Level / Working Part-time on KM from among the Shop floor staff.

Subject Matter Experts / KM Experts are chosen from among the employees based on expertise in an area

6 Process Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

– KM administrator would review the documents and upload it after assigning the required attributes, using the content management tools’ content upload workfl ow

– Ensuring that the knowledge items are available as and when they are due:

– Scheduling chat sessions with respect to requirements and invites users for the chat

Creating discussion forums within specific domains and sub-domains allows for organized conversations Users can be managed effectively, as the administrator has the ability to modify the user list at any time Additionally, new topics can be initiated, and topic requests from users can be approved or rejected, ensuring relevant and engaging discussions.

– Maintaining list of domains as a master list

– In case there is a change in the taxonomy, KM administrator would need to move the contents accordingly:

• Move contents from one head to another head

– The KM administrator will have to continuously track the usage of the con- tents in KM and accordingly create or modify the domains/categories in the master list

– Housekeeping activities on the KM system such as delete old/irrelevant content

• Facilitating the incentive plans for KM KM administrator with the help of the administrator system should do the following tasks:

– Generate report on the contributions and usage for the appropriate month/ quarter and level of the organization and run the report

– Select the contributor/user of the month

– Plan and facilitate to provide the incentives for the respective outcomes Roles and responsibilities of KM manager:

• Ensuring the development and implementation of their divisional KM programs

• Leading development of KM strategies

• Selecting appropriate common techniques to implement those strategies

• Heightening awareness and interest in KM

• Communicating expectations for KM to the staff

• Clarifying communications to the staff and ensuring that the dissenting points are heard and understood

• Promoting inter-division and interunit knowledge sharing

• Sharing KM best practices and communicating them to their division

• Periodically providing HR with forecasts of KM gaps and proposed solutions

• Serving as members of the organization KM steering committee

• Linking KM to critical business processes and initiatives

• Reporting KM successes and risks to senior management

• Communicating lessons learned from KM activities in other divisions to those involved in KM development activities in their divisions

• Developing measures and metrics to monitor the effectiveness of divisional KM activities

• Providing feedback to the CKO regarding results and lessons learned in their KM initiatives

Roles and responsibilities of KM analyst:

• Participating as members of case study organization’s KM community of practice

• Supporting the offi ce or unit KM program and divisional KM champion

• Identifying budgeting needs and applying resources to develop and implement

• Conducting focus groups to obtain staff input on KM needs, capabilities, and techniques

• Sharing KM best practices and communicating them to their units

• Participating in and leading KM pilot activities to support identifi ed priorities of their offi ce or unit

• Providing feedback to the divisional KM champion regarding results and lessons learned in their KM initiatives

• Periodically meeting with employees to identify knowledge gaps (personnel and procedures) and preparation of action plans

• Special endeavor toward populating the KM portal by encouraging people to contribute and share

• Ensuring highest quality of document upload in terms of spelling, paragraph, font, title, relevant abstract, PDF conversion (wherever needed), etc

• Keeping all the divisions/units updated on the contributions made by them, ensuring a healthy competition between the regions

• Deciding the contributor/user of the month

• Always keeping on the lookout for innovative ideas for knowledge creation, for example, through chats, discussion boards, personal interviews, or group discussions

• Designing the questionnaire for measurement survey of KM effectiveness

• Deciding the methodology for measurement whether it is manual or web based

• Helping units in collection of survey data

• Responsible for overall collection and monitoring of conducting the survey across the units

• Completing analysis and presentation of the fi ndings and results

Roles and responsibilities of KM engineer:

• Ensuring that the staff/shop fl oor people understand and meet case study organi- zation’s expectations from KM

6 Process Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

• Encouraging the shop fl oor people to share learning and knowledge

• Ensuring that the staff is trained on the use of common KM practices and techniques

• Ensuring that staffs receive appropriate rewards and recognition for knowledge sharing

• Ensuring that new and current employees are aware of the KM initiative and the importance of maintaining accurate and current information

Roles and responsibilities of KM expert:

• Providing domain/functional area focused inputs

• Participating as members of case study organization’s KM community of practice

• Reviewing of various documents submitted in the KM portal

• Providing rating of the documents

Roles and responsibilities of KM user:

• Understanding and meeting case study organization’s expectations from KM

• Providing rating of the documents (user feedback)

• Communicating expectations from KM to the KM managers/ KM analysts

• Participating in chats, discussion forums, and online collaborations For exam- ple, the user should request for a chat along with information on the topic and time for chat

• Participating as members of case study organization’s communities of practice

• Participating in e-learning course modules

Roles and responsibilities of KM contributor:

• Contributing knowledge items toward content creation for the KM portal

• Providing authentic and relevant information

• Complying with the metadata attribute requirements for any document

• Researching and preparing knowledge items useful toward meeting case study organization’s learning, technological, and innovation needs

Roles and responsibilities of KM technical support:

• Providing KM technical support for the KM system

• Evaluating and improve the functionalities of the KM system over time

• Ensuring accessibility and availability of the KM system to the employees of the case study organization

• Resolution of technical issues related to the functioning of the KM system

KM Reward Design with Incentive Plan and Matrices

Very often the performance and motivation of employees is the most signifi cant fac- tor infl uencing his participation in any activity through which a company’s revenue

The incentive plan and evaluation matrices for participants in Knowledge Management (KM) aim to enhance profitability and recognize key contributors By spotlighting prominent participants, the plan encourages wider engagement in KM practices It emphasizes the fundamental elements of knowledge capture and knowledge utilization, outlining strategies for both KM contributors and overall program effectiveness.

KM users In both the cases, the idea is to highlight the most prominent contributor and the most prominent user of KM

The Contributor of the Month is recognized for their significant contributions to the Knowledge Management (KM) repository within a given month This recognition is determined at three levels: the company level, division level, and unit level, based on a rating system that evaluates all employees The KM system must effectively track individual contributions and generate reports for the KM administrator, aiding in the selection process for the monthly contributor award.

Each month, the KM administrator conducts an activity to identify significant contributors to the KM repository The system generates a report that the administrator analyzes to select winners, displaying their images labeled as “userid.jpg.” The selection process is based on key factors, including expert ratings, user views or downloads, and user ratings Each document or article is evaluated across these three parameters, and the system maintains a record of the winners.

1 Coverage – Does the document cover the subject well?

2 Utility – Do you think this document is useful in the functional area?

3 Learning – Did this document teach you something new?

The relevancies are measured with ratings (1–3):

Users and experts will review the documents and provide feedback on each one Expert feedback will be recorded during the document approval process, while user feedback will be collected through two distinct methods.

1 On close of the document from the web browser, the system will generate an alert message saying that “Do you want to give a feedback.” On selection of the

“Yes” response, the system will open a feedback window for capturing the feed- back; on selection of “NO,” the system will cancel the operation

2 There is another link called “Feedback” against each document; on click of this link, the system will open a feedback window to capture feedback on the corresponding document

The latest rating given by user/expert would be considered for the contributor identifi cation

6 Process Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Rating calculation procedure: A contributor earns the average of the expert rating for the document (A) For example, if the expert gives the following ratings against each parameter for a document,

• Learning – 2 (good) then the average is = (3 + 1 + 2)/3 = 2

A contributor accumulates points based on the number of unique downloads or views a document receives from first-time users Additionally, they earn points equivalent to the average user rating for that document For instance, if two users provide ratings for a document, the contributor's score will reflect these evaluations.

• Learning – 3 (excellent) then the average for user #1 is = (2 + 1 + 3)/3 = 2

Then the average for user #2 is……… (2 + 2 + 2)/3 = 2

Then the consolidated user rating the contributor earns is

Average user rating = ((user #1 rating) + (user #2 rating))/No of users

P = Max ({30 % of B} or {Number of documents rated/number of documents downloaded})

User rating (C) = (Average user rating) * (P)

Final rating for each document = A + B + C

The total rating for a contributor is calculated by summing the final ratings from all documents (Doc1, Doc2, Doc3, etc.) This process consolidates inputs from both users and experts, resulting in a comprehensive report The ratings presented in the accompanying table represent the simple average of evaluations received by the contributor for each of their contributions An example of this can be found in Table 6.1.

The final rating column in the report must be sortable in both ascending and descending order Reports can be generated at three levels: company-wide, division, and unit Users can select time periods for the reports, including monthly, quarterly, and yearly From these reports, the contributor of the month will be chosen and recorded in the system, accompanied by the contributor's photo.

The homepage will feature the Contributor of the Month, showcasing a prominent display of the selected individual for 102 months Below the Contributor of the Month photo, a link titled "How does one become the Contributor of the Month" will be available Clicking this link will open a new window displaying a static page that outlines the calculation procedure for contributors.

Users can access a dedicated link on the KM site, where they can view their composite rating along with the current leading contender for "Contributor of the Month" and that contender's rating.

The display message is as follows:

Your composite rating for contributor [X]: 99.99 Your leading contender for contributor [Y]: 99.99

“Under My Contributions,” users can view his/her contributions and accessible status of his documents for the period of 3 months The report format is shown in Table 6.2

Every article page should include a "Feedback" link that directs users to a form designed to collect feedback for selecting the "Contributor of the Month." This feedback mechanism should offer three distinct formats for submission.

• After opening a document for reading and closing it, the user will be prompted to enter a feedback; if he clicks YES, the feedback form opens up for capturing feedback

• After every download, a mail should go to the user, requesting for feedback

• Every document should have the feedback link; on click of the link, the system will open a feedback window for capturing the feedback

The process environment design for the contributor of the month is detailed in Fig 6.12

The User of the Month is recognized as the individual who has utilized the KM repository the most within a given month This distinction can be awarded at three different levels: the company level, which encompasses the entire case study organization, as well as at the division level.

Table 6.1 Sample table for rating of the contributor

No of contributions Expert rating User rating

No of views/ downloads Final rating Select Contributor #1

Table 6.2 Sample table of the report format user contributions

No of downloads Document rating

To effectively implement a Knowledge Management (KM) solution, it is essential to design a process that evaluates both individual and unit performance across the organization The system must track user engagement by monitoring metrics such as the frequency of KM site access, unique document views or downloads, participation in chats and discussions with experts, and feedback provided on documents These key performance indicators will enable the KM administrator to generate reports that facilitate the selection of the "User of the Month," ensuring that recognition is based on comprehensive usage data collected during site interactions.

Access (A) refers to the frequency with which a user visits the site, allowing for a maximum of one point per day, regardless of the number of times they log in within that day.

• Views/download (B): Number of document views/downloads from the site for the month (one point/view or download per document)

Other Users and Experts Feedback Rating

No of Downloads and Views on the Contributed Documents

Participating in Discussion and Chat

Identifies Contributor of the Month

Fig 6.12 Process environment design – contributor of the month

• Usage of chat (C): Each participation in the chat is to gain one point

• Discussion forum (D): Each response for the month carries one point

• Feedback (E): Number of feedbacks given by the user for the month

The final user rating is calculated by summing the values of components A, B, C, D, and E Based on these values, the system will generate a comprehensive report, as illustrated in Table 6.3.

The rating column in the report should be sortable in both ascending and descending order Reports can be generated at the company, division, and unit levels, covering time periods such as monthly, quarterly, and yearly Users can select the "User of the Month" from the report, and their details will be recorded in the system The selected user's photo and month will be featured on the homepage, accompanied by a link titled “How does one become the User of the Month?” Clicking this link will open a static page detailing the calculation procedure for users in a separate window The design of the process environment for the User of the Month is illustrated in Fig 6.13.

Communication Plan and Design

Effective communication regarding the Knowledge Management (KM) initiative is vital for its success, as it fosters awareness and aligns employee expectations Consistent and repetitive messaging across various channels is essential for encouraging employees to utilize and benefit from knowledge repositories.

This article emphasizes the importance of prioritizing success stories, anecdotes, and personal experiences of managers and employees over theoretical discussions in Knowledge Management (KM) It outlines a communication plan tailored for manufacturing organizations to effectively implement their KM initiatives, detailing the approach across three distinct phases of the KM solution rollout.

The three phases thus discussed are:

Table 6.3 Sample table of the rating report

6 Process Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Identify User of the Month

No of times KM site was accessed

Participation on Chat and Discussion

No of Views and Downloads On Documents

Fig 6.13 Process environment design – user of the month

The primary communication objectives during the prelaunch phase are to create excitement and generate anticipation for the upcoming launch of Knowledge Management (KM), while also highlighting its usefulness and benefits.

Channels and activities: The various channels that can be used for promotion and awareness generation can be:

(a) Teaser mails: An advance or teaser mail to intimate the employees of the impending arrival of KM

(b) Info mail: An info mail with all basic details of KM (concept, frame- work, possible benefi ts, etc.)

• Creation of groups (The KM team has to be instrumental in spreading the news/word of mouth about KM and generate as much momentum as possible.)

Employees will have the chance to inquire about Knowledge Management (KM) through a dedicated platform called "Just Ask Us," designed to address their questions Genuine inquiries and their corresponding answers will be recognized and published in the organization's internal magazine, promoting clarity and understanding within the team.

The primary communication goals for the KM site launch are to encourage employee visits and educate them about its features By enticing users to explore the KM portal, it’s crucial to have pre-written and published content available at launch This strategy allows users to engage with the site immediately, helping them determine if they want to return for future visits.

Channels and activities : The various channels that can be used in this phase are:

(a) Everyday for 7 days prior to launch

(b) Education mails with proper information on the manufacturing organi- zation’s KM initiative, expectation from employees, roles and respon- sibilities, etc

(a) Navigation aspects of KM , etc

(b) Instruction/procedure for chat/discussion forums

(c) Instruction/procedure for document upload/download

(a) Showcase successful KM initiatives and benefi ts derived out of it

6 Process Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Summary

The implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) requires identifying and analyzing existing and necessary knowledge assets and related processes, followed by strategic planning and control to develop these assets and processes in alignment with organizational objectives At the strategic level, organizations must assess their current knowledge and identify future knowledge needs for effective business operations Operationally, effective process design is crucial, serving as the foundation for KM solutions; a generic process design framework can be tailored to meet the specific needs of any manufacturing organization Importantly, KM is an ongoing process, not a one-time initiative, making its continuous development essential for success.

In the post-launch phase, the primary communication objectives are to maintain user enthusiasm, encourage both initial and repeat visits to the KM site, and systematically introduce new features to sustain ongoing engagement.

Channels and activities: The various channels that can be used in this phase are:

(b) Treasure hunt (locate a document from KM portal based on hints given at various places within the portal)

(a) New feature addition in the “What’s New” section

The weekly usage report provides insights into the document download status across each division, while the weekly contribution report highlights the document upload activity for every division Additionally, the weekly highlights section summarizes key metrics, including the number of hits from each division, unique visitors, and the release of value packs.

(d) Graphical representation in a way which can be easily understood by all

(a) Star user of the month

(b) Star contributor of the month

The organization implements a structured framework for its knowledge management (KM) process, emphasizing the importance of knowledge sharing as a crucial component To facilitate effective knowledge sharing, it is essential to motivate employees to contribute their insights for the benefit of the firm The research provides a foundational approach that includes generic process design, organizational structure, key performance indicator (KPI) design, reward systems, and communication plans, which can be utilized by any manufacturing industry to establish a robust KM solution.

6 Process Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_7, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Introduction

Organizational Learning

Organizational learning (OL) refers to the study of how organizations learn and adapt to their environments through individual learning processes It emphasizes the sociopsychological aspects of learning, highlighting the importance of knowledge creation and acquisition for organizational adaptability As defined by Sun and Scott (2003), OL encompasses the mechanisms through which individuals within an organization learn The literature underscores OL as a crucial factor for effective management in the modern economy, supported by various scholars who recognize its significance in fostering organizational success.

Learning Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Learning Organization

Learning Organizations (LO) focus on creating environments that foster continuous learning and adaptability, as highlighted by Tsang (1997) and further supported by Sun and Scott (2003) and Senge (1990) While some researchers interchangeably use the terms Organizational Learning (OL) and LO, the normative essence of LO is distinct from the more descriptive nature of OL (Robinson 2001) An effective LO must engage in double-loop learning, emphasizing the need for ongoing self-recreation Senge's (1990) framework identifies five key disciplines of LO: team learning, personal mastery, shared vision, systems thinking, and mental models These disciplines represent various levels of learning, with personal mastery and mental models at the individual level, team learning and shared vision at the group level, and systems thinking at the organizational level (Isaacs 1993; Argyris 2004).

Knowledge Management

Knowledge is fundamentally a relationship between the knower and the known, with learners being the creators of knowledge It is defined as a justified true belief, where practices aligned with belief systems must meet actual outcomes to facilitate the transfer of true knowledge The primary aim of Knowledge Management (KM) is not to directly enhance worker effectiveness or improve an organization's bottom line, but rather to refine knowledge processing at individual, group, and organizational levels KM influences knowledge processes executed by operational agents, which subsequently affect knowledge outcomes Research indicates that inadequate KM can lead to negative organizational performance indicators Furthermore, studies have identified a three-tier structure of KM within organizations.

Knowledge management (KM) involves the creation, retention, and transfer of new knowledge, evolving through various tiers such as computational and organic views Research by Seely-Brown, Duguid, Hazlett, Argote, and Dyck highlights that effective KM is crucial for enhancing organizational management and performance, particularly during knowledge transformation This aligns with the "theory in action" theme of learning organizations (LO), emphasizing the need to generalize and craft knowledge so that employees can utilize it effectively and make it actionable.

7 Learning Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Learning Culture

It is only recently that researchers have begun to make genuinely systematic connections between learning, knowledge sharing, and culture within organizations

A robust learning culture is essential for the success of knowledge management (KM) in any organization, as it promotes a collaborative environment for effective knowledge transfer and breaks down silos to create shared organizational knowledge To enhance this culture, organizations should realign their learning goals to incorporate external knowledge alongside internal insights, facilitating innovation and meeting employee aspirations Key strategies include mentoring employees to enhance their roles and competencies, organizing seminars led by experienced staff, encouraging problem-solving discussions, providing regular training to upgrade skills, and improving access to e-libraries and research databases Implementing these practices fosters a conducive environment for KM initiatives through organizational learning (OL) and learning organizations (LO).

Research Gap Based on Literature

Effective implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) solutions in organizations necessitates strong learning designs and models that address critical elements such as processes, people, and technology The main goal of learning design is to outline the essential factors for successfully implementing KM solutions Previous research emphasizes the importance of fostering organizational learning and establishing a supportive learning culture as foundational to effective KM strategies However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies mapping these dimensions and their impact on the initiation and success of KM initiatives This research aims to explore how improvements in organizational performance indicators are influenced by the implementation and evaluation of learning factors and KM initiatives.

A learning organization is a collaborative effort that integrates people, knowledge, and technology to enhance learning For optimal outcomes, these components must operate in harmony, fostering quicker and more effective learning while boosting the organization's relevance Efficient knowledge capture and storage are facilitated by a well-designed learning system that consistently enhances organizational practices Additionally, the methodology of learning design significantly impacts how individuals collect and interpret knowledge.

Effective design decisions in learning environments rely on the instructional design approach, which emphasizes creating opportunities for individuals to acquire new knowledge through analysis This method incorporates learning activities that enable employees to internalize knowledge by engaging in practical, hands-on experiences rather than merely following instructions The evolution of learning strategies should prioritize the development of e-learning activities derived from knowledge management (KM) systems, addressing the complexities associated with e-learning in corporate settings Additionally, the reusability of learning design in e-learning has become a crucial advancement in KM implementations, highlighting a significant research gap in this area.

OL, LO, and KM is identifi ed, and it is detailed in Fig 7.1

Research Process and Methodology

Delphi Analysis

The Delphi analysis was employed to identify key learning factors from research and business literature, leading to detailed explanations of learning designs aligned with specific goals and objectives Additionally, the Delphi technique facilitated the development of the conceptual framework for this research, resulting in tailored learning designs derived from the analysis outcomes.

The Conceptual Model

From the Delphi technique it could be understood that KM is easy only with an effi cient system to capture and store the knowledge, which forms the basis of

Research Design Learning design for KM solution Step 1: Distinct factors for learning design

Phase 1.1: Identification of learning factors in the organization

Phase 1.2 Identification and assessment of status and existence of learning factors among employees and management

Phase 2.1 Learning design framework and regression model

Effective learning design can be captured through various methods, with instructional design being a key approach It is essential to create a learning environment based on a constructivist model, where learning is an active process that develops meaning through experience This approach emphasizes that learning should occur in realistic settings, integrating experience with tasks rather than treating them as separate activities, thereby embodying the "learning by doing" paradigm Additionally, e-learning technology plays a crucial role in enhancing the successful initiation and management of learning experiences.

Knowledge Management (KM) initiatives are significantly influenced by learning factors, which can directly or indirectly enhance performance indicators of KM Enhancements in these performance indicators positively affect the organization's strategic vision, forming the foundation of the conceptual framework for this study, as illustrated in Figure 7.3.

Construct Defi nitions

The defi nitions of constructs are provided in detail

Knowledge sharing within an organization involves disseminating information about new initiatives, individual perspectives, and creating a common platform to address global challenges This process facilitates the collection of feedback on both successes and failures, enhancing overall organizational learning and adaptability.

Communities of Practices Mentoring E-Learning

7 Learning Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

The KM administrator can post a knowledge-sharing request in the "Organization Learning" section, either directly or at a user's request The system is designed to capture essential information related to these requests, facilitating effective knowledge management within the organization.

• Community (user/user group to participate)

• Mode of communication (chat/discussion forum)

Communities are formed around shared goals and interests, focusing on specific learning objectives These groups can be temporary, created for particular events, or more permanent in nature A Knowledge Management (KM) administrator is responsible for assigning participants to these discussion groups, granting them the rights to contribute to organizational learning sessions Only the selected members receive communications and alerts from the KM administrator, ensuring targeted and relevant engagement.

Request to KM Administrator for Initiate Request

Convert chat / discussion into useful knowledge items

Response against Request KM Administrator

Communication can occur through chat or discussion forums, or a combination of both The system will store these threads, which the Knowledge Management (KM) administrator will convert into useful knowledge items manually All transcripts will be archived and cataloged for easy retrieval The transformation of chat transcripts and threaded discussions into knowledge documents will utilize existing functionalities within those sections.

This section is a forum for users within manufacturing organization to locate experts within the organization and get inputs from them

Users can access the expert's page via a link on the KM site, which features a comprehensive list of experts along with their areas of expertise Additionally, conducting a simple or advanced search on a specific topic can direct users to the relevant expert's page This page provides essential information about the expert, including their name, division, contact details, and useful links such as expert opinions, FAQs, tips, and suggestions.

A community of practice is a collaborative group of individuals united by a shared purpose, committed to exchanging information, enhancing knowledge, and tackling challenges together These communities thrive on the active participation of their members and foster continuous interaction to advance their specific area of expertise.

Communities of practice serve as collaborative learning environments where members engage in mutual teaching and learning, utilizing one another as sounding boards These communities emphasize problem-solving, knowledge sharing, and fostering innovation Additionally, each knowledge community may encompass various subcommunities that concentrate on specific functional areas.

Guideline to establish and facilitate CoP at manufacturing organization:

These guidelines offer essential tips for establishing and facilitating communities of practice, acknowledging that such communities can differ based on their specific goals and members Their purpose is to support the creation and management of these communities, ensuring a consistent, high-quality experience for all participants, which ultimately enhances the outcomes for community members.

7 Learning Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Step 1: Identifi cation of member needs – An e-mail survey may be a useful tool to get detail about the needs of potential members and scope the parameters of the community of practice A suggestive questionnaire can be in line of the following:

• What are your three key information and learning needs?

• What activities is your area currently undertaking in relation to the above areas?

• What do you expect to gain from participating in the community of practice?

• Are you interested in being part of a small informal steering group that would assist with devising the forward program of meetings and activities?

• We anticipate holding presentations at some meetings – who do you suggest could be suitable presenters and on which topics? (Note: this could include you.)

• What are your preferences with regard to meeting times, intervals, etc.?

• Based on your experience, what are the key success factors for this community of practice?

The survey results are to be analyzed with emphasis on the following:

• The level of demand and need for knowledge and capacity building in the particular topic area

• The willingness and capacity of potential members to contribute to supporting the group

• The level of knowledge and expertise of members in relation to the topic and their willingness to share this with each other

Step 2: Business case – A robust business value has to be ensured in terms of:

• Degree of alignment of the topic with manufacturing organization’s business objectives

• Level of priority of the topic among potential CoP members

• Whether there is a preexisting community of practice or forum in the topic

• The available capacity within manufacturing organization to provide facilitation support, especially in the initial phase of establishment

Step 3: CoP team structure and operating principle – The CoP team should be given the form of an offi cial entity to track the workings and outputs The structure should ideally be in terms of:

• Sponsorship – high-level advocate and stakeholder

• Mission and objectives – the who, what, and why

• Roles – leader, SME, knowledge expert, core team, etc

To foster ownership among members of a community of practice, it is essential to focus on clearly defining goals, terms of reference, and operating principles By emphasizing these elements, members are more likely to engage actively and take responsibility for the community's success.

• If a survey is carried out of potential members’ goals and expectations, the results can be presented at the fi rst meeting for discussion and agreement

• Once agreed, goals and terms of reference can be published on a web page and be periodically reviewed in consultation with members

• Operating principles can also help members clarify their expectations of each other

The rules set for CoP operation should be practical and inspirational, for example:

• At least one new learning from each meeting

• Privacy and confi dentiality is maintained within the community

• Views expressed are those of individual practitioner members

• After each meeting a summary of the discussion is circulated to members and uploaded to the KM portal

Step 4: Identifi cation of scope of KM team and online support – The KM team has to act as a facilitating group and encourage cross-division ownership

In addition the KM team would be entrusted with the following:

• Regular meetings to plan the forward program and identify how facilitation can be shared

• The team should help identify expertise, resources and references, presenters, site visits, venues, and topics for the broader community, as well as facilitate meetings

• Consider establishing an e-mail discussion list to help communication fl ow and facilitate relationships across the team and participants

• Ensure support of the CoPs from relevant units/divisions

• Encourage and facilitate the CoPs to become self-supporting

• Ensure that information sharing can happen from wherever the expertise lies, including within the group, from non-members and/or other units/divisions

• An e-mail discussion group may be set up to encourage member’s engagement and share expertise and information

• Links to information about communities of practice can be made from the com- munities of practice web page

• Technical support and facilitation for setting up of discussion forums for the CoPs

Step 5: Evaluation and measurement – Seeking regular feedback from members and periodically evaluating outcomes can be a useful means of measuring the

The relevance of community practice in health is crucial for identifying emerging issues and enhancing future planning Implementing timing evaluations can significantly contribute to this planning cycle, ensuring that potential challenges and opportunities are recognized effectively Key points to consider in the evaluation process include the assessment of outcomes and the integration of findings into strategic decision-making.

• Level of participation in e-mail discussion, presentations, and meetings

• Outputs achieved, such as better practice checklists and toolkits

• Evaluation of the uptake and usage of these checklists and toolkits

7 Learning Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

Step 6: Closing a CoP – A community of practice may be closed in any of the following circumstances:

• The group is no longer active

• It has achieved its principle purpose

The lead agency has evaluated the initiative and determined that it no longer fulfills its original purpose, is not a current organizational priority, and has deviated from its established mission.

• It has failed to become self-supporting

Suitable processes for closing a community of practice may need to be taken into account Issues to consider include:

• Consulting members regarding closing the community of practice

• Notifying members that the community of practice is closed, via e-mail and at meetings as appropriate

At the conclusion of all Communities of Practice (CoPs), the KM team and CoP members must collaboratively summarize the knowledge acquired, practical tips, and lessons learned for future projects, encapsulating this information in the form of K-products.

CoPs relevant to manufacturing organization

Some of the CoPs which can be set up for different areas during the initial phase are:

The Community of Practice (CoP) for new product development serves as a vital platform for exchanging insights on key elements such as product engineering, market analysis, product lifecycle management, and optimizing time to market.

Hypotheses

In the realm of Knowledge Management (KM), it is essential for learning factors to cultivate relationships in a coordinated and collaborative manner to enhance performance indicators This study investigates four key research hypotheses related to this concept.

H1 There is a signifi cant impact of organizational learning on process performance indicator

H2 There is a signifi cant impact of expert management system on fi nancial perfor- mance indicators

H3 There is a signifi cant impact of communities of practices and e-learning on the system performance indicators

H4 There is a signifi cant impact of mentoring on the marketing performance indicators.

Research Methodology

The survey constructs for this study were developed through an extensive literature review and semi-structured interviews with knowledge management (KM) managers, practitioners, and executives from top manufacturing firms in India All survey questions were measured using a five-point Likert scale to ensure the reliability of respondents' perceptions, as supported by Lissitz and Green (1975).

To test the hypotheses, relevant data were collected from manufacturing firms in India using a questionnaire survey methodology, which effectively reaches a large number of companies The questionnaire comprised close-ended questions, allowing executives to respond via email Sample firms were identified from the India Trade and Development business directory, a comprehensive resource for industrial company data A hard copy survey kit was distributed to respondents, including the questionnaire, a self-addressed envelope, a research purpose statement, confidentiality and anonymity agreements, and a commitment to share results post-study This information was also provided in a soft copy format Additionally, three follow-up reminders were sent for both hard and soft copy surveys to encourage participation.

A total of 150 questionnaires were sent to manufacturing fi rms After three follow- ups, 85 useable responses were received, representing a response rate of

A significant 57% of manufacturing firms participating in this survey have been practicing Knowledge Management (KM) for a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 2 years, showing favorable results compared to other empirical studies The distribution of these firms based on the number of years practicing KM is illustrated in Fig 7.5.

During a pretest, KM executives were asked to point out the degree to which certain measures tap the construct domain and to recommend modifi cations

7 Learning Design for Knowledge Management Solution Implementation

The reliability of the items within each dimension was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, with scores above 0.60 deemed acceptable and those above 0.80 indicating good reliability, as per Nunnally's guidelines A widely accepted threshold for reliability is 0.70, which suggests that more reliable measures enhance confidence in the consistency of individual indicators, ensuring the model's repeatability In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha scores for various constructs, including organizational learning, process performance indicators, expert management systems, financial performance indicators, communities of practice, e-learning, system performance indicators, mentoring, and marketing performance indicators, were 0.878, 0.825, 0.821, 0.921, 0.880, 0.834, 0.856, and 0.818, respectively All scores exceed 0.80, indicating a strong measure of reliability.

Empirical Analysis and Results

Survey Findings

H1 There is signifi cant impact of organizational learning and process performance indicators

To analyze the relationship between independent and dependent variables, multiple linear regression analysis was conducted on the collected data The independent variables that signify organizational learning include the objective of request, community, mode of communication, date and time, and expected learning (X1, X2, , X5) The dependent variables, which reflect process performance indicators, are lower searching costs, average cycle length, and service level improvements (Y) The linear regression model is expressed as Y = a0 + a1X1 + a2X2 + + a5X5.

Table 7.2 shows results of multiple linear regression analysis including the level of signifi cance for the relationship between the dependent outcomes and

Table 7.2 Contribution of organization learning to improvements in process performance indicators

Independent measure that has signifi cant partial regression coeffi cients B Std error Beta t p Adj R 2 ; P Lower searching costs

Objective of request 1.857 0.310 5.984 0.000 0.509 Community 0.380 0.178 0.393 2.139 0.034 0.000 Mode of communication

Date and time 0.335 0.161 0.345 2.075 0.039 Expected learning 0.303 0.132 0.276 2.287 0.023 Average cycle length

Date and time 0.303 0.119 0.261 2.540 0.012 0.000 Service level improvements

Objective of request 2.063 0.628 0.329 0.001 0.220 Community 0.276 0.117 0.241 2.362 0.019 0.001 Mode of communication

The analysis of the independent variables related to the implementation of knowledge management solutions indicates significant partial regression coefficients, as shown in Table 7.2 The tested regression models demonstrate meaningful results (p < 0.05), confirming that organizational learning plays a crucial role in enhancing process performance indicators.

The results presented in Table 7.2 indicate the support for H1 The contribution of organization learning was signifi cant for dependent variables/outcomes as revealed by the values of p < 0.05

H2 There is signifi cant impact of expert management system on fi nancial performance indicators

The expert management system was identified with independent variables for H2, focusing on locating experts and obtaining inputs through an accessible experts page that displays all relevant information The dependent variables include improvements in search speed and cost reduction Analysis results presented in Table 7.3 support the hypothesis that the expert management system enhances financial performance indicators, as the tested regression models show significance (p < 0.05).

The findings in Table 7.3 provide support for Hypothesis 2 (H2), as the independent measures demonstrated a significant contribution to five dependent outcomes, with a significance level of p < 0.05.

H3 There is signifi cant impact of communities of practices and e-learning on the system performance indicators

The independent variables/measures representing the communities of practices and e-learning are problem solving, knowledge sharing, and innovation The depen- dent variables/outcomes representing the performance indicators are cost

Table 7.3 Contribution of expert management system to improvements in fi nancial performance indicators

Independent measure that has signifi cant partial regression coeffi cients B Std error Beta t p Adj R 2 ; P Improvement in search speed

To locate experts and get inputs

User can reach the experts page

Experts page display all relevant information of experts

To locate experts and get inputs

User can reach the experts page

Experts page display all relevant information of experts

The analysis results, detailed in Table 7.4, indicate that the tested regression models are significant (p < 0.05) This demonstrates that communities of practice and e-learning play a crucial role in enhancing system performance indicators, ultimately contributing to competitiveness and excellence in service quality.

The results indicate the support for H3 The contribution was signifi cant for all fi ve dependent outcomes with p < 0.05

Mentoring has a significant impact on marketing performance indicators, particularly profit margins The analysis presented in Table 7.5 supports the hypothesis that mentoring enhances marketing performance, as the tested regression models yielded significant results (p < 0.05).

The findings support hypothesis H4, demonstrating significant contributions across all four dependent variables (p < 0.05) Consequently, the alternate hypotheses are accepted, leading to the rejection of the null hypotheses.

Managerial Implications

The fi ndings and results of this empirical study are critical for KM organizations

The manufacturing sector specifi cally is faced with growing competitive pressures in a highly disjointed, high market growth and challenges that intimidate its

Table 7.4 Contribution of communities of practices and e-learning to improvements in system performance indicators

Independent measure that has signifi cant partial regression coeffi cients B

Std error Beta t p Adj R 2 ; p Cost competitiveness

Problem solving −0.38 0.113 −0.393 −2.19 0.034 0.000 Knowledge sharing 0.455 0.179 0.417 2.545 0.012 Innovation 0.335 0.161 0.345 2.075 0.039 Service and quality excellence

Problem solving 1.721 0.306 5.619 0.000 0.509 Knowledge sharing 0.607 0.173 0.604 3.510 0.001 0.000 Innovation 0.221 0.173 0.222 2.798 0.006

Table 7.5 Contribution of mentoring to improvements in marketing performance indicators

Independent measure that has signifi cant partial regression coeffi cients B Std error Beta t p Adj R 2 ; p Profi t margins

One to one caring 0.880 0.234 3.762 0.000 0.656 Trust 0.656 0.066 0.672 9.861 0.000 0.000

Recent consolidations confirm that effective and flexible intra- and inter-firm relationships are crucial for enhancing an organization's competitive stance By responding promptly to market needs, organizations can outperform competitors in efficiency This study highlights the significant impact of various learning factors on knowledge management (KM) performance indicators, revealing that organizational learning greatly influences process performance Additionally, financial performance indicators are significantly affected by expert management systems Focusing on communities of practice and e-learning can further boost marketing performance indicators for KM executives.

Summary

This research presents significant theoretical contributions to the knowledge management (KM) literature, offering valuable insights for KM managers and practitioners The developed learning designs and models serve as a strategic foundation for manufacturing organizations aiming to implement KM solutions These models can be tailored to meet the specific goals of each organization However, the research has limitations, including the lack of consideration for human resources and the applicability of key performance indicators solely to the manufacturing sector Future research opportunities involve adapting these learning designs for the service industry and exploring additional modules such as top management influence, risk management, training, and sustainability in KM implementation.

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_8, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Introduction

Objective for Strategy Planning

In today's complex business landscape, organizations must clearly understand their objectives and the strategies needed to achieve them Companies are undergoing a significant transformation as competition evolves from the industrial age to the information age This shift requires a reevaluation of traditional practices to stay competitive in a rapidly changing environment.

From 1850 to 1975, companies thrived by effectively harnessing economies of scale and scope, with success largely dependent on their ability to integrate new technologies into physical assets for efficient mass production of standardized products However, the emergence of the information age demands that both manufacturing and service organizations develop new capabilities to remain competitive The key to success now lies in a company's ability to mobilize and leverage its resources effectively.

The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework is crucial for implementing knowledge management (KM) solutions, as the significance of intangible assets has surpassed that of physical assets in today's information age Organizations now operate under new assumptions that emphasize cross-functional collaboration, strong connections with customers and suppliers, effective customer segmentation, global reach, innovation, and the importance of knowledge workers.

Methods of Strategy Planning

Methods of strategy planning are detailed in Fig 8.1

Total Quality Management (TQM), Six Sigma, and the EFQM Excellence Model are methodologies that emphasize non-financial metrics as key indicators of financial performance Numerous case studies highlight the significant improvements achieved through the implementation of these systems In contrast, ISO and major public accounting firms prioritize the internal processes that produce financial data.

Team for Strategy Planning

The team for strategy planning is detailed in Fig 8.2

The CEO is responsible for formulating the company's strategy, while the administrator plans and monitors progress, reporting directly to the CEO Supervisors create specifications and oversee the workflow, ensuring that tasks are executed efficiently The operations manager is tasked with implementing the project, handling the day-to-day activities necessary for successful execution.

Fig 8.1 Methods of strategy planning

Need for Tool to Assess the Planning

1 Focusing the whole organization on the few key things needed to create break- through performance

2 Helping to integrate various corporate programs, such as quality, reengineering, and customer service initiatives

3 Breaking down strategic measures to local levels so that unit managers, opera- tors, and employees can see what’s required at their level to roll into excellent performance overall

4 Fixing stretched target for the measures created and monitoring periodically to improve the results

5 Attaching these measures to individual performance measure

The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is an essential management tool that measures a company's performance against its vision and strategic objectives It continuously assesses whether the organization and its employees are meeting the desired outcomes outlined in the strategy Developing a BSC framework is crucial for effectively implementing Knowledge Management (KM) solutions, as it also facilitates the articulation of necessary objectives and initiatives that align with the company's strategic goals.

Meaning of BSC

“BSC provides executives with a comprehensive framework that translates a company’s vision and strategy into a coherent set of performance measures ,” by

Drs Robert Kaplan and David Norton from Harvard Business School developed the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach to address the shortcomings of traditional management methods This innovative framework offers specific guidance on the key performance indicators that organizations should measure to achieve a balanced perspective The BSC is not merely a measurement tool; it serves as a comprehensive management system that helps organizations articulate and align their vision and strategy effectively.

Fig 8.2 Team for strategy planning

8.1 Introduction and translate them into action It provides feedback around both the internal busi- ness processes and external outcomes in order to continuously improve strategic performance and results When fully deployed, the BSC transforms strategic plan- ning from an academic exercise into the nerve center of an enterprise The BSC suggests to view the organization from four perspectives and to develop metrics, collect data, and analyze it relative to each of these perspectives as in Fig 8.3 The four perspectives are:

• The learning and growth perspective

Effective measurement is essential for managers to gain a comprehensive understanding of their company, enabling informed long-term decision-making According to the Baldridge Criteria (1997), modern businesses rely on performance measurement and analysis, which should align with the company's strategic goals This process generates critical data on various aspects such as customer satisfaction, product and service efficiency, operational performance, market positioning, competitive benchmarks, supplier effectiveness, employee engagement, and financial metrics.

“To achieve our vision, how should we appear to our customers?”

“To Succeed financially, how should we appear to our share holders?”

“To achieve our Vision, how will we sustain our ability to change and improve?”

“To satisfy our share holers and customers, what business processes must we excel at?”

Fig 8.3 Four perspectives of BSC

Data analysis involves examining information to uncover trends, make projections, and identify cause-and-effect relationships that may not be immediately apparent This process is essential for various business functions, including strategic planning, performance evaluation, operational improvement, and benchmarking against competitors or industry best practices.

Performance improvement significantly relies on the development and utilization of performance measures or indicators, which are quantifiable traits of products, services, processes, and operations that help companies monitor and enhance their performance It is crucial to select measures that accurately reflect the elements contributing to better customer, operational, and financial outcomes A well-rounded set of indicators aligned with customer and company performance goals provides a solid foundation for synchronizing all activities with the organization’s objectives By analyzing data from these tracking processes, organizations can assess and modify the measures to better support their goals, emphasizing the fundamental principle of cause and effect linkage.

BSC Concepts

This tool enables the visualization and analysis of an organization's strategic information, encompassing the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) by organization or function, key performance indicators (KPIs), and their related cause-and-effect relationships, along with corresponding graphic displays The concepts and phases of the BSC are illustrated in Table 8.1 and Figure 8.5.

Architecture of the BSC

Oracle BSC uses three-tier architecture which is comprised of a database tier, a web server tier, and a desktop tier Users connect to BSC through any Java-enabled web

If we have the right staff

We will keep / get more business

and doing things “right” Profitability

Fig 8.4 Cause and effect linkages: the basic principle

8.1 Introduction browser The web server tier provides business logic and generates dynamic web pages The presentation layer of the web server, which is part of the application tier, and the business logic for BSC are implemented as Java Servlets and Java Server Pages (JSP) running on Apache JServ Apache JServ, a module of Apache web server, implements the Java Servlet API for running server-side Java The architec- ture of the BSC is shown in Fig 8.6

BSC Architecture Modules

BSC architecture modules are installed in client–server mode connected to an enter- prise database The BSC architecture modules include:

1 BSC Setup: this is the tool used to set up the BSC system after installation It is used to register BSC systems, administer database privileges, import data, upgrade systems from previous releases, and migrate data between systems

Main views representing strategy objective and perspectives

Key performance indicators Strategic resources

Cascading multiple scorecards associated with responsibility

Historical trends, comparison, and contribution analysis for multiple organizational dimensions

Performance measurement at KPI and scorecard level, with alarm colors representing actual and benchmark data

• Obtain Clarity and Consensus about Strategy:

2 BSC Architect: this tool is used to set up BSC; create and confi gure indicators, groups and datasets; and set calculation and other options inside BSC tables where data is stored There are three sub-modules:

• Builder: used to create indicators and groups and to assign key performance indicators (KPIs) to different BSCs

The KPI designer is essential for organizing the visualization and categorization of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), allowing users to customize the functionality of scorecard formulas and datasets while personalizing the overall design of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) to meet their specific needs.

The Metadata Optimizer is a crucial tool for assessing all datasets and dimensions related to a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Key Performance Indicator (KPI) It generates an input table structure necessary for populating data into the BSC This process is initiated after modifications are made in the KPI Designer that impact the configuration of various indicators and groups.

3 BSC manager: this tool is used to load and confi gure the data in the BSC tables There are two sub-modules:

• Loader: used to physically load data into the tables used by the viewer from the input tables

• Administrator: used to assign and restrict access to BSC (tabs) and KPIs according to responsibility title

4 System requirements: this section outlines the system requirements for BSC, including requirements for the web browser, software, and BSC architect platform

5 BSC architect platform requirements: Pentium CPU, or equivalent, with a minimum processor speed of 266 MHz; Windows NT Version 4.0 and Service Pack 3; minimum disk space of 65 MB; minimum recommended memory of

64 MB; BSC architect requires Oracle 8.0.6 Client and Microsoft Excel 95 or above; Windows XP users must install the Oracle 9i Release 2 client and Oracle 8.0.6 client

HTTP server (Apache HTTP Server)

Data server Desktop Tier Application Tier Data base Tier

Process to Implement the BSC

Utilizing standardized non-financial metrics can significantly decrease the time, cost, and risk associated with implementing the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) These targets and measures serve as the essential "medium of exchange" throughout the four key steps in the BSC implementation process.

Need for the Strategy

1 Excessive reliance on a single product (deposits)

2 A cost structure that made it unprofi table to service 80 % of its customers at prevailing interest rates

To enhance operational efficiency, the strategy focuses on transitioning unprofitable customers to more cost-effective distribution channels, such as electronic banking The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework has been utilized to translate these strategies into specific objectives and measurable outcomes across four perspectives, as illustrated in Figure 8.8.

Research Gap Based on Literature

The literature emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework for effective organizational transformation It is evident that a systematic performance management approach utilizing BSC is essential for driving organizational changes, such as Knowledge Management (KM) A detailed literature review identifies a significant research gap, illustrated in Fig 8.9.

Fig 8.7 Four processes to implement BSC

Redesign the Staff Development Process

“Develop the competencies needed to support the sales process”

Need to Devise a holistic balanced scorecard framework

Assessment of strategy and measures

Development of database design process

Recommendation for implementation, maintenance and system security measures

8.2 Research Gap Based on Literature

Research Process and Methodology

The research process and methodology for addressing this research gap are not universally applicable; they must be tailored to each organization's unique needs While a foundational process and methodology can be established, it is crucial for organizations to customize these frameworks according to their specific requirements For a detailed overview, refer to Fig 8.10.

Case Study Demonstration

Period of Study

This study analyzes data from 2008 to 2009, focusing on past and baseline records for trend analysis The adherence to delivery timelines is evaluated based on budgets set by the sales departments, utilizing both primary and secondary data for comprehensive insights.

Devise a holistic balanced scorecard framework based on

Assessment of strategy and measures based on detailed data analysis with data series, periodicity, tolerance range and alarm indicator

Development of linkage hierarchy based on current organizatuon structure and brainstorming process

Recommendations for four perspectives based on the outcome of data analysis and brainstorming process

Development of database design process based on data flow diagram

Recommendation for implementation, maintenance and system security measures based on strategy brainstorming process

Fig 8.10 Research process and methodology

The study utilized a sample of 139 participants, with primary data sourced directly from records Secondary data was obtained from journal publications, specifically extracting information from Electronics Signals and Controls Private Limited.

Data Particulars and Analysis

The key data elements for the study encompass delivery adherence, customer complaint rates, resolution times for complaints, and revenue generated from new products and customers This data is systematically classified, rearranged, and regrouped to align with the study's objectives Data sheets serve as the primary method for data collection, while the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) tool is employed to evaluate performance effectively.

Scope of the Study

Electronics Signals and Controls (ESICO), established in 1991 in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, is a premier manufacturer of industrial signal lamps designed for diverse applications Founded by a team of skilled engineers and technocrats, ESICO has developed a robust infrastructure, including a modern workshop capable of producing over 55 types of lamps With 13 years of expertise in design, manufacturing, research, and development, the company has steadily grown to become a recognized leader in the industrial signal lamp market, offering a wide range of products to meet domestic needs.

ESICO Global Presence

ESICO is a leading manufacturer of robust industrial signal lamps designed for diverse industries, particularly in modern machine shops With a satisfied clientele of over 200 in the domestic market, ESICO is dedicated to quality, adhering to its commitment to excellence The company, certified under ISO 9000, emphasizes tight tolerances and perfection in its production process ESICO's focus on delivering superior quality products is driven by its core competency in integrating advanced research and development with exceptional design and manufacturing capabilities.

Infrastructure

ESICO's strong infrastructure enables the consistent production and delivery of world-class industrial signal lamps The organization prioritizes the upgrade of its research and development facilities, ensuring the provision of high-quality products With a modernized workshop, ESICO offers a diverse range of industrial lamps and provides excellent in-house training to enhance workforce skills This commitment to training allows ESICO to deliver value-added services while adhering to international quality standards The sophisticated infrastructure facilitates competitive pricing and the adoption of the latest technological advancements, leading to 100% customer satisfaction Additionally, ESICO's robust after-sales service network has proven essential in retaining and expanding its customer base.

Product Range

The product range is shown in Table 8.2

This study helps us to commit to performance-based management Build a strat- egy for the dynamic situation and progress toward the strategy “DO right things,

"By emphasizing the importance of doing things right and doing things differently, organizations can clearly define roles and responsibilities for each team member This clarity not only enhances job satisfaction but also leads to financial rewards, ultimately transforming the organization into a strategy-focused entity."

BSC will bring the following benefi ts into the organization:

1 Enhance strategic feedback and learning translates a company’s strategy into a balanced set of KPIs

2 Communicate these goals throughout the organization

3 Align individual, organizational, and cross-departmental initiatives

4 Enhance strategic feedback and learning

The BSC for this organization is devised based on the four perspectives.

Adherence to Delivery

To effectively reduce cycle time, the strategy focuses on comparing the budgeted target value with the actual value for each month Achieving this goal hinges on meeting specific performance criteria.

Understanding customer needs is crucial, as customers are the focal point of any business, influencing its reputation and stakeholder benefits To enhance customer satisfaction and drive success, it is essential to effectively monitor the entire order-to-cash process.

Number of machined planned = sum of machines whose scheduled shipment date falls on the given period

Number of machined dispatch = sum of machines whose actual dispatch falls on the given period

2 Periodicity: monthly machine dispatched data

Miniature conical type LED lamp (L2)

Refl ection type LED lamp (L4)

Halogen lamp cylindrical with adjustable base (L17)

Miniature dome type LED lamp (L80)

Marketing assessments must analyze the cause-and-effect relationships behind results, implementing effective measures for improvement Refer to Table 8.3 for the data sheet on signal lamps and Figure 8.11 for the data flow diagram (DFD) symbol.

Base item “2005” “0” “1” Delivery ( %) Quantity on time Total quantity

Customer Complaint Rate

The strategy focuses on proactive management of customer maintenance schedules and the introduction of retrofit promotions, along with annual service audits, to enhance control and supervision of maintenance at the customer’s site Key performance indicators (KPIs) include the ratio of registered service requests to the number of machines under warranty Monitoring is conducted through metrics such as the number of complaints, total machines, and customer complaint rate.

• Customer complaint rate = number of service requests divided by the number of machines within warranty

2 Periodicity: monthly machine dispatched data

• Unacceptable > 100 % with respect to budget

Assessment: Everyone’s effort must be focused to bring down the customer com- plaint rate to zero level.

Customer Complaint Resolution Time

The strategy is to minimize resolution time The measure is based on the budgeted target value versus the actual value for that month The success of the business is

Square, defiles a source or destination of system data Arrow, identifies dataflow – data in motion

Circle or bubble, represents a process that transforms Incoming data flow(s) into outgoing data flow(s).

Open rectangle, represents a data store – Data at rest or temporary repository of data

Fig 8.11 Symbols in data fl ow diagram (DFD)

8.4 Case Study Demonstration based on after sales service We must have an effective system to hear the customer complaint either by call center service or online complaint registration The KPIs give the entire details about the organization’s response in resolving the customer complaint against his call The measure used to monitor is “total number of service request,” “time taken to resolve,” and “complaint resolution time.”

• Complaint resolution time = total time taken to resolve the complaint during a specifi c period divided by the total number of complaints registered

• Unacceptable > 100 % with respect to budget

Assessment: Customer service shell should check the cause and effect for the results and effective measure should be taken for the improvement.

Linkage with Corporate Strategy

All the strategies are connected with the key indicators, so that the benefi ts and the effects can be seen with drill down facility

1 Main corporate objectives defi nition with main code

2 Sub-objectives defi ned for the departments and divisions align for the main objectives

3 The data are taken in such a way to achieve the objectives

4 The main objectives are shown with drill down facility

5 All the KPIs are concentrated with four perspectives

The linkage hierarchy is derived based on brainstorming process with 120 execu- tives in the organization, and it is shown in Fig 8.12

The CEO defi nes the corporate strategy The items were distributed across the four perspectives of the BSC as:

• Adherence to delivery, customer complaint rate, customer complaint resolu- tion time, revenue from new customers, and revenue from new products

• Increase sales revenue, increase net margin; maintain overall margins, asset turnover, return on capital employed; and perform a sales export analysis

• Cost of quality, optimize human capital, reduce cost and inventory control system and manufacturing lean time, learning and growth, training hours per employee, and value added per employee

The corporate objectives will be integrated into individual scorecards, with performance updates occurring monthly This information will connect to the master scorecard, allowing the CEO to assess achievements for the period and compare them against budgeted values.

Findings of the Case Study

This one-year study on strategy planning utilized both primary data from mill records and secondary data from trade journals The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) viewer provides an accurate representation of the current status, while the assessment sheet outlines the next steps and guidance for future actions.

A one-year data analysis revealed that adherence to the scheduled delivery of products was inconsistent, with scheduled machines not being delivered on time Instead, unplanned machines were provided to meet production volume requirements.

Analysis of one year’s data reveals that the customer complaint rate peaks during the warranty period of 6 months to 1 year, primarily due to incorrect and insufficient supply of components These complaints stem from the pressure to meet production targets.

Chief Executive Officer - Corporate Objective KPI

Operation Level Owners - Process Level KPI Process Owners – Sublevel objective KPI

The customer complaint resolution time period varies from a minimum of 3 days to a maximum of 30 days This should be minimized to 6 working days as per manage- ment’s decision.

Recommendations for the Case Study

The recommendations stem from a brainstorming session involving 120 executives within the organization, leading to the identification of four key areas of strategic management activities.

1 Learning and growth is fostered by KM activities and initiatives These include strategic recruiting, hiring, training (both formal and informal), team develop- ment, document management, collaborative communication systems, knowl- edge and skills audits of employees, knowledge base developments, and fostering of communities of interest within the organization

2 Business process improvements may range from moderate and localized changes to wide-scale changes in business processes, the elimination of paperwork and steps in processes, and the introduction of automation and improved technology Deployment of the BSC measurement system itself is one of these processes

3 Customer loyalty cannot any longer be taken for granted within the government nor is it suffi cient to manage it in an ad hoc or anecdotal way Rather, customer relationships are becoming increasingly structured and measured Not only must the agency work closely with customers on a personal level, it must also gain documented and continuous feedback on customer perceptions and loyalty These efforts come under the general heading of customer relationship manage- ment (CRM)

4 Financial management – in the passive sense of “bean counting” – is giving way to proactive initiatives in activity-based costing (ABC), functional economic analysis (FEA), earned-value management (EVM), and other practices by which managers can learn more from fi nancial data, in order to track projects more closely and make better cost estimates Also, innovations in budgeting – includ- ing the Government Performance and Results Acts’ (GPRA) goal of linking per- formance to budgets – are replacing zero-based budgeting and other earlier techniques in government agencies The availability of improved database tech- nology with more business intelligence capability is turning fi nancial manage- ment into an active part of an agency’s overall strategy for success

5 In conclusion, management experts agree that learning and growth are the key to strategic success, the foundation for the future Learning and growing organiza- tion is one in which KM activities are deployed and expanding in order to lever- age the creativity of all the people in the organization The linkage between cause and strategic activities is shown in Fig 8.13

Enhance Strategic Feedback and Learning

The gap analysis identifies the difference between desired performance goals and current levels, highlighting the performance gap that strategic initiatives can address Consequently, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) not only assesses changes but also encourages them This strategic planning process is illustrated in Fig 8.14.

Fundamental Design Concepts

Data fl ow diagram (DFD) is a charting tool which traces a network of data fl ows through a system by symbol representation like rectangle arrows, circle, and double

Fig 8.13 Linkage between causes and strategic activities

8.4 Case Study Demonstration lines DFD is a documentation technique, which is primarily used in the requirement analysis stage A DFD can be used at any level of detail DFD are quite valuable for establishing naming conventions and names of system components such as subsys- tem, fi les, and links It describes what fl ow (logical) rather than how they are pro- cessed, so it does not depend on hardware, software and data structure, or fi le organization DFD consists of a series of bubbles joined by lines The bubbles rep- resent data transformation, and the line represents data fl ow in the system It is also known as “bubble chart.”

8.4.14.1 Objective of Data Flow Diagram

The Data Flow Diagram (DFD) provides a clear overview of the current business processes for which the system is designed, highlighting any overlooked gaps in operations and clarifying user requirements For a detailed representation, refer to Fig 8.15.

Database Design Process

A database is a collection of interrelated data stored with minimum redundancy to serve many quickly and effi ciently The database serves as a repository of data; as

Fig 8.15 Data fl ow diagrams

A well-designed database environment allows multiple users to access and utilize common data effectively The database design process is an integral part of the overall system design, divided into three distinct phases Initially, it involves gathering requirement specifications from end users to create a design that remains independent of specific hardware or software constraints The entity-relationship model is widely recognized as the most effective approach for this purpose Subsequently, the conceptual model is mapped into a logical model compatible with the chosen relational database management system (RDBMS) Finally, the physical data tables are implemented, and decisions are made to enhance the database's functionality in line with the proposed application.

The summary of BSC design is indicated in Fig 8.17

Implementation and Maintenance

The implementation and maintenance strategies are shaped by the organization's goals and insights from a brainstorming session with 120 executives The testing process emphasizes both the internal logic of the software and the functional aspects, ensuring that all statements are tested and defined inputs yield expected results This chapter outlines various testing strategies, including unit testing, integration testing, and system testing Unit testing involves assessing individual program units to identify coding and logical errors within each module, focusing on control paths to ensure module integrity.

Fig 8.17 Summary of BSC design

Integration testing involves systematically constructing program structures while identifying errors at the interfaces, utilizing an incremental sandwich integration approach This method combines top-down and bottom-up strategies, allowing for easier isolation and correction of issues Interfacing is tested with compatible sample data to minimize response times System testing encompasses various tests aimed at ensuring all elements of the system are integrated and functioning correctly Key types of system tests include recovery testing, which assesses the software's ability to recover from failures, and security testing, which verifies protective measures against unauthorized access Stress testing challenges the system under abnormal conditions to optimize performance, while performance testing evaluates the run-time efficiency of the software within the integrated system Finally, system implementation involves making the new system operational through careful planning and user training.

1 Implementation planning: This planning is a logical starting point to manage different activities that must be covered A pre-implementation meeting with the personnel from all departments is arranged The software is implemented in the month of April 2009

2 User training: Hands-on training to user is essential to make them comfortable with the system Accordingly, 2- or 3-day demonstration and practical training with the past data are given to the users who will be the specifi c users of the system.

System Security Measures

Users are provided with separate user ID and password, and different responsibili- ties are attached to different users based on the level of access allowed to them This

8.4 Case Study Demonstration is the fi rst and primitive way of restricting the user to handle only their data and also effectively ensuring that the user is constraint by not being able to know any other thing other than what is available or shown to them User login history is stored in a separate fi le and also in the changed record and can be retrieved on the need basis This ensures that user logins can be monitored, and also the changes made by them can be located

In scenarios requiring enhanced security for critical data, audit trails are implemented to log changes made to records, detailing who made the change, along with the timestamp, old value, and new value These audit trails can be generated as needed for analysis Additionally, periodic backups are conducted and stored in an archive, allowing for recovery when necessary Various techniques, such as incremental and full backups, are utilized based on the established backup and recovery strategy.

Summary

To drive transformative change within the company, senior executives should strategically plan and set measurable targets for the scorecard over a 3–5 year horizon Achieving these ambitious financial objectives requires managers to clearly identify and align their initiatives with these goals.

To effectively meet the needs of external customers, organizations must set stretch targets for their internal customers Once these targets are established, managers can strategically align their quality initiatives, response times, and reengineering efforts to achieve breakthrough objectives The planning and target-setting process allows organizations to quantify desired long-term outcomes, identify necessary resources, and establish short-term milestones for both financial and non-financial measures on their scorecard Experts emphasize that fostering a culture of learning and growth is essential for strategic success and future development A learning organization actively engages in knowledge management (KM) activities to harness the creativity of its workforce The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) system operates as an open, KPI-driven framework that can be tailored to meet organizational needs, featuring a user-friendly graphical interface that enhances visualization across all levels While any system may have limitations, it can be modified to incorporate necessary changes for continuous improvement.

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_9, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Introduction

Benefi ts for Suppliers

The Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system empowers suppliers to manage production planning and stock replenishment for their customers effectively By receiving detailed information on demand forecasts and current demand, suppliers can proactively align their production processes to ensure timely stock replenishment This strategic approach enhances efficiency and responsiveness in inventory management (Sari 2007).

Implementing Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) allows suppliers to optimize replenishment schedules and maximize vehicle capacity, leading to significant reductions in transportation costs.

Accurate demand forecasting enables suppliers to significantly lower their inventory carrying costs by eliminating the necessity for maintaining large safety stock levels This streamlined approach reduces excess inventory and enhances overall efficiency in supply chain management.

Suppliers can effectively promote new products by maintaining inventory at the customer's location, which alleviates retailers' reluctance to stock unfamiliar items due to uncertain demand This strategy facilitates the introduction of innovative products into the market, enhancing overall sales potential.

• Ability to meet changing demands – With proper demand forecasting, vendors in a vendor-managed system can respond better to changing markets by gauging changing demand patterns (Dong and Xu 2002 )

A robust and enduring relationship throughout the supply chain is fostered through the Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system, ensuring that suppliers establish strong connections with retailers and end users, ultimately reducing customer defection rates (Claassen et al 2008).

Benefi ts for Retailers

By allowing suppliers to manage inventory and provide accurate demand forecasts, retailers can significantly reduce the likelihood of stock-out issues This proactive approach ensures that products remain available, enhancing customer satisfaction and sales performance.

• Reduction in administration costs – Implementing a VMI system helps the retailers to avoid voluminous material planning and backorders, thereby reduc- ing administration costs (Sari 2007 )

By allowing vendors to manage inventory and make replenishment decisions, retailers experience a significant reduction in lead time for product delivery (Wang and Ru, 2009; Claassen et al., 2008).

Effective space utilization is achieved through timely stock replenishment by vendors at retailers' locations, which helps prevent excess inventory accumulation that can occupy valuable retail space (Carbone 2009; Waller et al 1999).

A Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system streamlines the procurement process by eliminating the need for extensive material requirement planning (MRP) In this system, retailers communicate demand forecasts and actual demand directly to the vendor, enabling efficient inventory replenishment (Dresner et al 2009).

Implementing a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system significantly reduces product obsolescence by allowing vendors to accurately assess demand patterns This ensures that inventory levels are optimized, leading to timely replenishment of stock and minimizing the risk of unsold products becoming obsolete (Sari 2007).

End User Benefi ts

Implementing a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system significantly enhances product availability, minimizing the risk of stockouts at retail locations This ensures that end users can rely on consistent stock availability whenever they need products (Xu and Leung, 2009).

Implementing a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system can significantly reduce switching costs for customers When products are not readily available, customer loyalty may wane, leading to higher defection rates However, a VMI system helps mitigate these issues by ensuring product availability, thereby minimizing the financial burden associated with switching suppliers.

Benefi ts for the Entire Supply Chain

The Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system significantly reduces the bullwhip effect by enabling vendors to accurately assess actual demand and forecasts from retailers This collaboration minimizes production variability and prevents excessive inventory levels for both parties Consequently, the VMI system is crucial in mitigating the whiplash effect in supply chain management, leading to more efficient operations and better resource allocation.

• Error reduction – The robust information systems used for the VMI system help to arrest losses occurring due to human error in data entry (Zammori et al 2009 ; Vigtil 2007 )

The vendor's capability to access real-time demand forecasts and current inventory levels significantly enhances processing speed, enabling timely inventory replenishment and reducing delays.

157 the lead times and processing speed in the entire supply chain and (Claassen et al 2008 ; Dong and Xu 2002 )

Implementing a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system significantly lowers inventory and transportation costs for vendors, leading to overall cost reductions within the supply chain This streamlined approach enhances efficiency by creating a leaner supply chain, as highlighted by Zammori et al (2009) and Gentry (2008).

Major Limitations and Risks in a VMI System

While the VMI system offers significant advantages for suppliers, retailers, end users, and the overall supply chain, its implementation is not without challenges Key limitations and risks associated with VMI systems must be carefully considered to ensure successful integration and operation.

One significant limitation of the Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system is the potential threat of product substitutes, as highlighted by Chopra and Meindl (2007) They illustrated this issue using the example of detergents from Procter & Gamble and Unilever When a retailer employs VMI for both suppliers, there is a risk that the suppliers may overlook the influence of substitutes, leading to inaccurate inventory levels.

Implementing a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system necessitates significant investment in IT infrastructure, including advanced Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) systems and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software like SAP, i2, and Oracle Additionally, the integration of data tracking technologies such as RFID and barcode scanners can incur high costs for testing, setup, and ongoing maintenance.

The implementation of Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) will significantly transform organizational processes, as inventory management and replenishment responsibilities shift to the vendor Effective change management is essential to ensure that all employees adapt to these changes, making it a critical factor for successful VMI implementation (Michaelraj and Shahabudeen).

Implementing a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system reduces retailers' flexibility, as they must notify suppliers in advance about upcoming sales events and promotions This advance notice is essential for suppliers to adjust their replenishment schedules accordingly, leading to a more rigid operational framework for retailers (Claassen et al 2008).

The risk of forward integration by suppliers arises when they manage a retailer's inventory, as this provides them with valuable insights into demand forecasts, actual demand, demand cycles, optimal inventory levels, and sales strategies This information empowers suppliers, potentially leading to increased control over the retail process and a competitive advantage in the market (Disney and Towill 2003a).

• Vulnerability to unforeseeable events – Implementing a VMI system would mean vendors would try and achieve optimum levels of inventory at the retailer’s prem-

9.1 Introduction ise However, this would address unforeseeable events, such as calamities, requiring more stocks with the retailer (VMI 2009)

A successful Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system relies heavily on a trustworthy relationship between suppliers and retailers Any disruption in this relationship can lead to significant inventory issues and impact the entire supply chain (Wang and Ru, 2009) Retailers may perceive pressure to stock only the vendor's products (Carbone, 2009), resulting in increased switching costs if they decide to change suppliers (Brandt, 2009).

Maintaining lower inventory levels under a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system can lead to reduced shelf presence for certain products, causing them to go unnoticed by consumers As a result, shoppers may be drawn to competing products that are more prominently displayed, potentially impacting sales and brand visibility.

Key Issues in Design and Implementation of VMI

Implementing a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system is a complex process that requires careful planning and cannot be completed quickly Organizations must recognize the importance of approaching VMI implementation in a phased manner to ensure success The different stages involved in designing and implementing a VMI system are illustrated in Figure 9.2.

Phase 1 – Open communication: There should always be an open communication channel between suppliers and retailers on what each entity’s strategy, goals, targets, and objectives are when being considered to be part of the VMI system (Zammori et al 2009 )

Phase 2 – Information sharing: As seen earlier, information is one of the key ele- ments in the VMI system, and accuracy of the transmission will play a pivotal role in the success of this system Suppliers and retailers should therefore reach a consensus to provide accurate information to each other (Vigtil 2007 )

Phase 3 – Reliable information receipt: Vendors receive demand forecasts, actual demands, and inventory level updates from the retailers The use of this informa- tion should be primarily to handle the retailer’s inventory by the vendor, and therefore the vendors should agree and work on being extremely cautious and reliable with the receipt and use of the information received Retailers also should ensure that the information transmitted should unarguably be reliable (Vendor Managed Inventory 2009; Vigtil 2007 )

Phase 4 – Order policy and risk share: The supplier and retailer should come to a consensus on the minimum order point, maximum level of inventory, and safety stocks It is also important to reach an agreement on the sharing of risks in the event of stock-outs or obsolescence Similarly, agreements on the sharing of rewards should be made between the supplier and retailer

Phase 5 – Resource allocation: The setup and implementation of a VMI system requires a huge commitment of resources from both the suppliers and retailers

Personnel from both the retailers and vendors should use their skills, talents, abilities, and knowledge and work together using a robust IT infrastructure to design the VMI system (Ramrakhyani 2009; Vigtil 2007 )

Phase 6 – Pilot runs and adjustments: Before the execution and implementation of a full-fl edged VMI system, ample pilot runs should be conducted to iron out the fl aws and make necessary changes and adjustments in the system

Phase 7 – Implementation: The fi nal stage in the VMI system is deployment and implementation where the inventory monitoring, planning, and management and replenishment decisions will be taken over by the vendor so as to reap all the benefi ts described in the earlier section for the vendors, retailers, end users, and the total supply chain However, the system should be open for continuous improvements and adjustments so that the vendors and retailers can be ready to tackle the ever-changing markets (Zhao et al 2009; Chen et al 2009 )

Apart from the above steps in the design and implementation of VMI system in an organization, the management should also wake up to the fact that they should

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 Phase 7

Fig 9.2 Implementation phases in a VMI system

9.1 Introduction put in a considerable effort to help employees adapt to the changes in their environ- ment when this new setup is brought into practice Appropriate change management processes and procedures need to be in setup for the benefi t of the employees and the organization.

Research Gap Based on Literature

The literature emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) framework and evaluation for effective organizational transformation A systematic VMI approach is crucial for facilitating organizational changes, such as Knowledge Management (KM) Additionally, the identified research gap, illustrated in Fig 9.3, underscores the need for further exploration in this area.

Research Process and Methodology

The research process and methodology cannot be generalized for this research gap

The development of the basic process and methodology is fundamentally influenced by the nature of the organization being studied This framework can be tailored to meet the specific needs of the organization For a detailed overview, refer to Fig 9.4.

Study the existing vendor management model in the organization

Identification of problems in the existing vendor management model in the organization

Identification of information sharing method

Design of proposed VMI system

Development of implementation steps for proposed VMI system

Case Study Demonstration

Corporation A Group

The Corporation A Group, India's leading automotive component manufacturer with a turnover exceeding one billion dollars, specializes in a wide range of products including auto-electrical systems, diesel fuel injection systems, braking systems, automotive wheels, axle fasteners, powder metal components, radiator caps, two-wheelers, and computer peripherals Supported by five service and distribution companies, the group boasts the largest distribution network for automotive products across the country.

Corporation X

Corporation X was set up in 1961 as a joint venture of XX Industries to manufacture automotive electrical systems The company designs, manufactures, and supplies advanced technology systems, products, and services to the world’s automotive, after market, diesel engine, and aerospace industries The combination of these two well-known groups has resulted in the establishment of a vibrant company, which has had a successful track record of sustained growth over the last three decades Corporation A is one of India’s 20 largest industrial houses with 25 manufacturing companies and a turnover in excess of US$ 1.3 billion The turnover of Corporation

In the fiscal year 2003–2004, Corporation X and its divisions generated US$ 233 million in revenue By leveraging the strengths of XX and Corporation A Group, Corporation X has established itself as a leading player in the automotive sector The company caters to a diverse range of segments, including passenger cars, commercial vehicles, tractors, jeeps, two-wheelers, and off-highway vehicles, alongside stationary and marine applications As the Indian automobile industry continues to evolve, Corporation X remains at the forefront of innovation and growth.

Corporation X is experiencing remarkable transformations and is well-prepared to tackle future challenges with its state-of-the-art facilities As the leading manufacturer of auto-electrical components in India, it consistently sets industry standards The products are tailored to satisfy the requirements of vehicle manufacturers both domestically and internationally In response to the tightening emission standards in India, Corporation X guarantees that all its products comply with global standards.

Quality Assurance

Corporation X is committed to achieving ever-increasing levels of customer satisfaction through continuous improvements to the quality of the products and services It will be the company’s endeavor to increase customer trust and confi dence in the label “Made in Corporation X.”

Quality is no longer an option but a basic requirement in today’s world

At Corporation X, quality is integrated into every stage of manufacturing, driven by the belief that quality starts and ends with the customer This philosophy underpins their prevention-oriented quality policy, which incorporates traditional quality control principles Quality control is a shared responsibility across all levels of the organization, fostering both individual and team accountability The effectiveness of their quality control system has led to notable achievements, including the ISO 9001 certification awarded by BVQI in December 1993, and a recent recognition for QS 9000 in Auto Electricals.

Study of Existing VMI Model

Corporation X's current Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) model lacks depth and structure The company is focused on creating a more coordinated operational framework Their proprietary software, RASIS, is designed to calculate the bill of materials (BOM) and is integrated with suppliers, enhancing overall efficiency and collaboration.

A is known for its quality It had received Deming’s quality award in 2004 So in order to maintain the quality standard, it has a well-established buying group called

The Y buying group determines raw material prices based on current market conditions, allowing suppliers to source materials from approved suppliers at rates set by the group Z Logistics handles approximately 90% of the logistics for Corporation X, managing the collection of delivery indents (DIs) from Corporation X to suppliers and ensuring the timely delivery of materials from suppliers to Corporation X.

X In some cases , for the remaining 10 %, suppliers manage their own logistics

Corporation X has a supplier development cell who will monitor the supplier’s way of working and their method of procurement They will even check whether the sup- plier is procuring materials from and authorized dealer They will insist all suppliers to plan for their 100 PPM implementation For new suppliers, the development cell even creates a layout as per Corporation X’s expectations The study of the existing system is based on the interviews with 70 executives in the organization.

Existing Model at Corporation

The existing model at the corporation is explained in detail:

• Purchase department will sen d a procurement plan to all suppliers every

• Marketing will input the demand requirement in RASIS This will be done every week

• RASIS will calculate the BOM and it will send indication to the respective vendors

• Suppliers will plan for their production for that week with the help of RASIS

• DI will be sent to all suppliers every morning

• Material will be received from all the suppliers only as per the DI schedule, irre- spective of requirement given through RASIS

• As soon as the material is received, it will be sent for barcode scanning

• Finally the material is moved into the factory.

Problems in Existing VMI Model

The problems in the existing VMI model are identifi ed based on the interviews with

70 executives in the organization and are detailed below:

• The 3-month plan given by Corporation X, weekly schedule through RASIS, and

DI given through Z Logistics differ a lot This will create a huge problem at the supplier’s end

• Their requirement has huge distortions and the compensation is not borne by Corporation X

Case 1: Weekly schedule is less than DI; hence, supplier cannot meet the demand for which they have to pay for shortage of material

Case 2: Weekly schedule is more than DI, which makes the supplier carry their inventory

Case 3: DI will be asked for a material which is not given in the weekly schedule or sometimes material which is supposed to be given the next day as per the weekly schedule

Suppliers play a crucial role in production, as the absence of even one component can halt the entire manufacturing process of an item To prevent production delays, companies must seek alternative products or modify existing components when a supplier fails to deliver This situation often leads to significant challenges within the production chain.

• This kind of change in the production plan will create immediate requirement of some materials, for which the supplier has to bear the logistics activity

The survey analysis reveals that suppliers of Corporation X feel inadequately protected, as they are required to purchase raw materials exclusively from designated sources Additionally, when raw material prices rise, suppliers must absorb the increased costs without any compensation from the company, leaving them financially vulnerable.

• Corporation X is not only a customer to its suppliers but also a supplier to some of its suppliers

In certain situations, a company may fail to provide the necessary raw materials to its supplier, resulting in the supplier's inability to fulfill their requirements Despite this challenge, the company still requests that the supplier meet the demands.

• The survey analysis also depicts that the company is not transparent to its suppli- ers, which is an important factor for establishing VMI

• Though suppliers are fi nding a lot of problems, they are also creating problems like increase in the number of returned products and improper response to the software system

Key Findings from the Study

The key fi ndings from the study are detailed below:

Analyzing the issues from both the supplier's and company's perspectives reveals that the primary problem is the insufficient sharing of information, leading to poor coordination between parties.

Inefficiencies in delivery from a single supplier can disrupt Corporation X's production plan, affecting all suppliers involved It's important to recognize that while one supplier may be inefficient, this issue can arise with any supplier, including those that typically perform well As a result, the company cannot afford to dismiss any supplier due to potential delivery challenges.

The analysis highlights a critical issue with the software: while the marketing department inputs demand and the Bill of Materials (BOM) is calculated accordingly, the process fails to incorporate inventory information, leading to potential discrepancies in supplier notifications.

• Example: Alternator model SM4 Consider each alternator requires one fan.

– So software will intimate the fan supplier as 220, but the company already has

60 fans on hand, i.e., as inventory; this detail is not updated This will put the supplier in trouble

• The software used by the company, RASIS, is updated weekly; hence, suppliers are not in a position to predict day-to-day activities

• The responsibilities and ownership of the suppliers are very weak in the present working system

• This system involves huge paperwork on both the company’s and the supplier’s side

• Cost involved in communication is very high in the current system

• Not only the cost but the time involved is also abruptly high.

Different Methods of Information Sharing

Uncertainties in the supply chain often lead to excess inventory, making it essential to identify and address these uncertainties A primary cause of uncertainty is the insufficient information sharing among supply chain members By enhancing communication and sharing information, each member can gain valuable insights about others, leading to improved overall system performance This collaborative approach to increasing information sharing among supply chain participants is known as a supply chain partnership.

A supply chain partnership is a collaborative relationship between independent members in supply channels that enhances information sharing to achieve specific objectives, such as reducing total costs and inventories This partnership creates a win-win scenario for all involved parties The effectiveness of these partnerships is based on various methods of information sharing between adjacent partners in the supply chain, as illustrated in the accompanying figures.

Decentralized control in supply chain management involves independent inventory management at various sites, with no information sharing or coordination between manufacturers and suppliers Each party makes inventory decisions based on its own forecasts; manufacturers rely on customer demand data while suppliers use the manufacturer's ordering information Both typically implement a base stock policy, characterized by periodic reviews, where orders are placed to replenish stock to a predetermined level (S) whenever inventory falls below a specific reorder point (s).

Method 2, known as "coordinated control," involves the synchronization of two adjacent inventories through the sharing of customer ordering information In this approach, suppliers access both customer demand data and the manufacturer's ordering details, enabling them to make informed inventory decisions that reflect current demand and ordering patterns.

Method 3 is referred to as “centralized control.” Here, the decentralized supply chain can obtain the optimal performance achievable by a supply chain under

Auto Component India (P) Ltd Demand

Auto Component India (P) Ltd Demand

Auto Component India (P) Ltd Demand

Fig 9.5 Method of information sharing

Fig 9.6 Average inventory level in all three methods

9.4 Case Study Demonstration centralized control Based on EDI, both the manufacturer and the supplier can retrieve the customer’s demand information in a synchronized manner VMI can be adopted This means the supplier takes the initiative to make major inventory replenishment decisions for the manufacturer in parallel with their own inventory decisions In this case, the supplier will not depend on the manufacturer’s order- ing information but on the customer’s demand directly

Pareto improvement indicates that all participants in a system are at least as well off, with some benefiting more than others Analyzing inventory reductions and cost savings across three levels of relationship integration reveals that suppliers gain proportionate benefits as information integration increases In a supply chain partnership characterized by information sharing, both suppliers and manufacturers achieve at least the same level of well-being, with at least one party—either the supplier or the manufacturer—experiencing additional benefits This partnership enhances the overall performance of the supply chain, demonstrating that Pareto improvement is attainable regarding its collective efficiency Our case study, informed by interviews with 70 executives, utilized Method 3 to explore these dynamics.

Design of VMI: A Five-Step Process

A five-step process, developed through Delphi analysis, is implemented to establish a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) program for direct materials The flow chart, created after the third round of analysis, is illustrated in Fig 9.7.

The fi ve steps to implement VMI are as follows:

The initial step in implementing Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) is to identify suppliers who possess the necessary capabilities and willingness to participate It is crucial to select suppliers based on their proximity to manufacturing plants and their understanding of customer goals and processes, including the macro planning data utilized by customers for their internal planning.

Establish and label a fixed location for each item Determine target inventory levels

Determine which parts cost the most to manage Get suppliers to include part numbers

Fig 9.7 Five-step process for design of VMI

169 are located within an hour of the plant they supply and can get a representative to the plant at least once a week.)

In the second step, customers should identify suitable parts from suppliers for Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI), prioritizing items with frequent deliveries and low value, as these tend to incur the highest costs Targeting low-risk items, such as those costing only a penny or two, is essential since the planning, scheduling, and receiving processes are similar regardless of the item's value It is advisable to focus on repetitive commodities supplied by nearby vendors that can be easily managed visually.

• The third step involves the company and suppliers fi nalizing the part numbers

The fourth step involves establishing the order and delivery frequency along with target inventory levels, which should include standard Kanban quantities and the types of returnable containers that enhance efficiency The quantities of Kanban containers are determined by the consumption rate and the time needed to replenish an empty container.

In the fifth step, the company must designate a specific location for each item, ensuring it is positioned near the point of consumption This strategic placement allows workers to easily access the necessary parts when required, enhancing efficiency and workflow.

Activities Involved in Implementation Process

Supplier representatives should visit the plant at least three times a week to assess stock levels in bins, slots, or cells and determine replenishment needs They visually inspect inventory and identify materials required for restocking fixed locations Reordering is triggered by indicators such as empty Kanban containers, racks, or locations, depending on the specific part being monitored When items are shipped, they are labeled "VMI" by the supplier to inform the receiving department of their inclusion in the Vendor Managed Inventory program To support long-term planning, customers provide VMI suppliers with macro planning data, sending a weekly email containing a rolling 12-month demand projection.

For the customer, the benefi ts of VMI are numerous:

• It eliminates manual planning and scheduling for all material in the program

• All materials have a fi xed and visible location, which the supplier manages, reducing the time to locate material

• The program eliminates receiving transactions for incoming materials and elimi- nates the need to maintain delivery information, since the supplier is responsible for proof of delivery information

• It has also streamlined the company’s accounts-payable activities by eliminating the purchase-order/receipt-matching process and consolidating invoices

• Most importantly, the program eliminates a number of stock-outages

Benchmarking VMI

VMI programs can significantly enhance supply chain efficiency, reducing inventory levels by up to 70% while potentially doubling revenue Surprisingly, the required IT investment for implementing these programs is often less than anticipated Companies typically assess the effectiveness of VMI through various key performance metrics.

• Data feed timeliness and accuracy

Supplier Segmentation

Properly implemented vendor-managed inventory (VMI) can foster a valuable partnership between customers and vendors Success in VMI requires a mutual understanding that both parties benefit; otherwise, the partnership risks becoming costly and complicated VMI involves the vendor monitoring and replenishing the customer's inventory based on a service contract designed to protect both interests Essential elements of this contract include demand forecasting, contract duration, pricing, product quantities, implementation timelines, payment terms, service levels, penalties, termination processes, quality standards, and engineering change notifications However, initiating VMI with all suppliers at once can be challenging, making it crucial to identify and segment potential suppliers effectively.

Empirical Model of Supplier Segmentation

The model consists of two dimensions that underpin a VMI relationship strategy toward suppliers:

• The supplier’s commitment to VMI

• The commodity’s importance to VMI

The supplier segmentation model categorizes each dimension into high and low levels of supplier commitment and commodity importance to Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) This model outlines four key relationship strategies that highlight the varying degrees of supplier dedication and the significance of the commodity within a VMI framework Each strategy possesses distinct characteristics and sets specific expectations regarding supplier selection criteria in relation to VMI.

A transactional relationship strategy involves manufacturers investing minimal resources in supplier relationships and Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) In this approach, suppliers provide only basic, singular components, resulting in low mutual commitment and a reliance on price-driven transactions Additionally, manufacturers have access to alternative supplier options, emphasizing the transactional nature of these partnerships.

A friendly relationship strategy involves the manufacturer nurturing a robust partnership with a specific supplier, who is seen as a key collaborator This approach emphasizes the supplier's commitment to Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI), often leading to a reliance on the manufacturer, although it may lack significant innovation.

A business partner relationship strategy involves the manufacturer fostering intense competition among suppliers, particularly with larger suppliers that play a crucial role in their operations This strategy is defined by the presence of a market-leading supplier, significant purchasing volumes, and a diverse range of product offerings, ensuring that the manufacturer benefits from competitive pricing and innovation.

A family relationship strategy involves a manufacturer dedicating resources to Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) with a specific supplier, fostering a robust corporate partnership This approach emphasizes a commitment to mutual success, prioritizes technological advancement, enhances cost efficiency for the manufacturer, and is vital for strengthening the manufacturer's brand.

The three steps of fl ow of implementation are detailed in Figs 9.8 , 9.9 , and 9.10

Fig 9.8 Implementation Step 1 of supplier segmentation

Customer Business Processes

Effective communication of demand and consumption between customers and vendors is essential This can occur through regular forecasts sent via EDI or B2B Internet communications, along with updates on actual consumption and stock adjustments Alternatively, an annual contract may facilitate on-site replenishment on a predetermined schedule, which is particularly beneficial in manufacturing settings with standard products across multiple locations Additionally, a blend of demand/consumption methods and purchase commitment dates may be established at the product level It is crucial that the methodologies and timing of these processes are clearly documented in the agreement.

To automate contract management effectively, customers must integrate purchase order functionality within their ERP system This includes managing key elements such as contract start and end dates, expected annual quantities, and unit prices for each contracted product Additionally, the system should facilitate the release mechanism for products, establish agreed-upon service levels and reorder points, and define stock authorization types, whether approval-based or automatic Furthermore, it should outline payment terms, cancellation criteria, stock-out penalties, and incident tracking, while also determining if products are Quality-At-Source (QAS) certified QAS enables a collaborative approach where customers and vendors share information, allowing for pre-inspection of materials according to customer specifications before shipment.

Supplier commitment to VMI (High)

Supplier commitment to VMI (High)

Supplier commitment to VMI (Low)

Fig 9.10 Implementation Step 3 of supplier segmentation

The purchase-order system should accommodate multiple receipts for a single order and effectively track these receipts by part number, especially when multiple parts are included in the VMI contract A potential solution is to create individual purchase orders for each part number; however, this approach increases the number of orders to manage and the workload involved in their setup.

Monitoring the performance of both vendors and customers is essential, utilizing reports from the purchasing system Vendor performance is evaluated based on their ability to maintain stock levels as per the contract and the quality of products delivered Furthermore, integrating the purchasing system with the accounts-payable system is crucial for tracking on-time invoice payments, ensuring compliance with payment terms The system should also alert buyers when product consumption deviates from forecasted demand, whether exceeding or lagging Additionally, customers should conduct cycle counts of product receipts to audit compliance effectively.

Vendor Business Processes

Effective demand forecasting and consumption communication require vendors to receive and process information in a format that matches the customer's Notably, not all ERP solutions can distinguish demand forecasts by customer, yet this capability is crucial for monitoring forecast deviations, planning replenishments, and tracking overall performance.

“commit to buy” aspects of the supply contract The customer order system must have all of the same elements as the corresponding contract purchase-order system

If a customer order system cannot track multiple shipments for various lines, it leads to the creation of multiple sales orders for a single purchase order This limitation complicates reporting requirements due to the absence of multiline customer order contracts with multiple shipment capabilities Additionally, customer orders need to be integrated with the quality system when a QAS environment is necessary, as such environments typically require a certificate of compliance or a certificate of analysis for each shipment.

Proposed VMI System and Necessary Steps

The proposed VMI system and the necessary steps for implementation of VMI are derived based on the results of the third round of the Delphi analysis.

Step 1: The top management must commit to the process Their support is vital

They must commit to factors like costs involved, manpower needed for setup/ maintenance, and also the concept of having someone else manage their inventory

Step 2: The employees should adapt themselves to this new concept Without their acceptance, the VMI program cannot take off They must understand that VMI will not push them out of a job It will free up some of their time to allow them to be more productive in other areas

Step 3: Synchronize the customer’s product fi les with the supplier This step alone is one of the greatest benefi ts of VMI This is done by establishing new ERP software with all required information Synchronizing means that you must match the supplier’s product data with the distributor product data Are there old, obsolete items on the fi le? Have new product numbers been properly communi- cated to the distributor?

Step 4: Extensive testing of all EDI sets to be used The supplier and distributor/ customer must work very closely together to validate that the data is being prop- erly sent/received For example: Does the quantity on hand that is being received by the supplier match the quantity on hand in distributor’s stock? EDI testing may take many tries and adjustments before its fi nalization

Step 5: The distributor/customer must understand and agree with the stocking plan the supplier is creating Even though the exact method may be a proprietary method, the distributor should still have an understanding of how the plan is cre- ated This will help avoid the future question: “Why did they send us this product if we don’t need it?” Additionally, predetermined inventory turns, fi ll rates, and service levels should be targeted The distributor/customer should also monitor their current performance for comparison with later results Both parties must agree upon the frequency of replenishment (once daily/twice a week)

Step 6: The distributor/customer sends the supplier his point of sale history fi le, usu- ally for 1–2 years (on a disk or through e-mail) The format of the fi le must be compatible with the needs of the supplier Then, the distributor sends an EDI indicating the product movement This tells the status and stock level of every item they have Both sets of data have to be verifi ed This is the last and most important validation point

Step 7: Distributor/customer should use the item and enter that transaction into the computer

Step 8: On a daily/weekly basis, the distributor/customer sends a product activity

Step 9: The supplier receives the material movement information and demand requirements and updates the distributors’ stocking plan Once an item or items have hit their reorder point (ROP), the supplier creates an order

Step 10: The supplier electronically generates a purchase order to the customer

During the beginning stages of the VMI partnership, it is important to have peri- odic reviews at both ends to identify any problems

Step 11: The supplier collects and ships the order and transmits a delivery notice When the shipment is received, the customer transmits a material receipt notice (MRN) This tells the supplier exactly what was received The supplier can then match this to his purchase order to determine any potential problems (mis- shipped, etc.)

Step 12: The invoice is sent out via an electronic billing system Payment is done through electronic transfer of fund (ETF)

The fl ow chart for the proposed system is detailed in Fig 9.11

Conclusion

Managing an organization's supply chain and aligning it with the firm's competitive strategy are crucial for maintaining a competitive edge in the industry Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) serves as an effective supply chain practice to explore, as it enables companies to achieve a lean supply chain with reduced lead times and lower inventory levels By implementing the VMI system, firms can effectively meet their operational goals and enhance overall efficiency.

Payment instruction sends to accounts through RFID tag in accepted material

E-Payment sends to Vendor as per agreement

ERP will indicate demand to approved vendors

Key parameters for implementing ERP

Vendors able to calculate the current demand by combining both

ERP will enquire vendor capacity

After capacity calculation, Customer will place a purchase order

After clearance, automated invoice generation

Delivery instruction to Z logistics by vendor

Generation of MRN (Material receipt note)

The long-term success of a firm hinges on the effectiveness of its suppliers and customer satisfaction, highlighting the importance of a successful supply chain Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) plays a crucial role within this supply chain framework Currently, there is a significant shift in global business philosophy towards enhanced partnerships To optimize these supply chain collaborations and boost overall productivity, it is essential to enhance the planning and management of interconnected systems, including materials planning, inventory management, supplier relationships, supplier development, capacity planning, logistics, and production systems The advent of information technologies has facilitated the creation of integrated systems that support effective decision-making.

Establishing strategic partnerships with suppliers is crucial for a successful supply chain, prompting corporations to limit their supplier base through vendor review programs aimed at identifying those with operational excellence A closer customer-supplier relationship enhances collaboration, making it easier to work together As businesses shift towards sole supplier relationships, full information disclosure becomes essential, allowing for the development of a compatible culture and the implementation of aligned forecasting and information technology systems Suppliers must be able to electronically connect to the customer's system to access vital information such as shipping details and production schedules.

The proposed system enhances channel operations by seamlessly integrating supplier information with the company, leading to improved efficiency through a fully systematic process devoid of manual intervention However, despite its straightforward implementation, real-world challenges such as interpersonal dynamics and professional relationships can pose significant obstacles Ultimately, establishing trust is crucial for the success of the Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) model, which relies heavily on technological tools like Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) to thrive.

A VMI partnership involves two independent members in supply channels collaborating through enhanced information sharing to achieve specific objectives, such as reducing total costs and inventories, creating a win-win situation for both parties To enhance VMI performance, various strategies are suggested, but effectiveness largely depends on the types of items and materials used in the industry Successful implementation of VMI requires a stepwise improvement approach As market dynamics evolve, competition has shifted from individual firms to entire supply chains, making it essential for firms to focus on channel performance to gain a competitive advantage Therefore, while the proposed system aims to improve operational efficiency, continuous enhancement should consider factors like item nature, cost, and shelf life for future success.

Future research prospects are detailed below:

• Development of the conceptual VMI model for multistage supply chain with vertical information integration

• Simulation, optimization, and comparison of VMI model for inventory decisions with traditional system

• Simulation of the conceptual VMI model using both periodic and continuous review policies

• Development of a heuristic for optimizing the system parameters of inventory decisions

• Comparison of the traditional inventory model with a VMI-based inventory system

VMI can significantly enhance supply chain profits when both parties are dedicated to sharing accurate internal accounting data and consistently transmitting, receiving, and utilizing this information for effective inventory management.

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7_10, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Summary

The successful implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) solutions relies on three key pillars: people, process, and technology Various factors influence these pillars, including readiness, behavior, taxonomy, and organizational structure This study aims to develop essential designs and models for effective KM implementation A conceptual model was created through macro-level brainstorming, identifying six modules for micro-level analysis An integrated approach combining empirical research and expert opinions was used to generate a comprehensive blueprint for assessing readiness, behavioral change, and the necessary technology landscape for KM solutions Additionally, the research emphasizes the importance of process design, learning, communication, and aligning internal and external functions, such as balanced scorecards and vendor-managed inventory The findings contribute significantly to KM literature and offer practical frameworks for KM managers in manufacturing organizations, allowing for customization to meet specific goals and objectives.

The primary goal of a readiness assessment is to evaluate the current status of an organization in relation to the critical success factors of the three pillars of Knowledge Management: process, people, and technology This module aims to develop a generic conceptual framework and solution procedure to guide organizations in enhancing their Knowledge Management strategies.

A comprehensive readiness assessment was conducted for a manufacturing organization, involving 180 standard components and subcomponents tailored to align with the organization's mission and vision This assessment engaged 85 executives and identified key areas for improvement, including tacit and explicit knowledge sharing, the establishment of knowledge centers, and the implementation of appropriate measures for knowledge management solutions.

The primary intention of behavior assessment is to assess the exact behavior pat- tern among the people in the organization toward the implementation of KM solution

This module aims to create a versatile conceptual framework and solution procedure for behavior assessment in manufacturing organizations, accommodating various behavior types and targets derived from existing literature These behavior types can be adjusted to align with the organization's mission and vision In the case study, behavior assessment revealed six distinct behavior types within the organization, including skeptics (10%) and converts.

(23 %), cynic (14 %), procrastinator (16 %), potential (21 %), and rebel (16 %), and the targets for certain behavior types need to be reviewed and revised for the improve- ment toward the acceptance for KM solution implementation

The design of taxonomy and technology architecture aims to identify current and future knowledge management (KM) components within navigation and content layers, assessing the technology landscape's suitability for implementing KM solutions This module provides a generic conceptual framework and solution procedure for developing taxonomy and technology architecture tailored to manufacturing organizations, incorporating various KM components and IT integration landscapes These KM components, derived from existing literature, can be adapted to align with the organization's mission and vision For the case organization, a taxonomy and technology architecture was developed featuring one navigation layer, twenty content layers, and 167 KM components for structured knowledge, along with a suggested macro-level technology architecture.

The main goal of process and environment design is to create an effective framework for knowledge management (KM) solutions, focusing on knowledge capture, storage, retrieval, administration, key performance indicators, and organizational structure This approach ensures that the process design and organizational structure are tailored specifically for the case organization.

The main goal of learning, reward, and communication design is to create effective learning factors, incentive plans, and metrics that support the implementation of knowledge management (KM) solutions This module has been specifically tailored for the case organization.

The linkage plan aims to connect knowledge management (KM) goals with the overall objectives of the organization, while also integrating external entities By examining the balanced scorecard as an internal function and vendor-managed inventory as an external function, we highlight the balanced scorecard's role as a strategic planning tool that aligns the organization with its vision of success This approach ensures that teams focus on the right priorities and achieve meaningful results Developing a balanced scorecard system is akin to assembling a puzzle, where various components unite to create a cohesive whole We have formulated a conceptual framework and model to support this integration.

The implementation of a balanced scorecard focused on customer relationship-based strategic planning is integral to knowledge management (KM) solutions This study successfully applied a conceptual framework within a case company, emphasizing the architecture of the balanced scorecard Vendor-managed inventory (VMI) represents a crucial external supply chain function, where vendors are tasked with monitoring and managing retailer inventory This research analyzes VMI's key knowledge elements and its significance within the broader supply chain, evaluating both its benefits and risks The design and implementation steps for VMI are thoroughly examined, alongside a case study that highlights KM solution implementation Additionally, an analysis identifies industries that could significantly benefit from adopting this system.

Scope for Further Work

Future research should focus on developing innovative designs and models for the service industry, examining factors such as top management influence, risk assessment, training methodologies, and sustainable implementation of knowledge management (KM) solutions The survival of organizations in an evolving landscape remains uncertain, as does the nature of essential learning processes The dynamic internal and external environments of organizations are shaped by the escalating intensity of knowledge generation within and around them.

Future research on the impact of external components in Knowledge Management (KM) implementation is essential, as is a thorough investigation of KM functions Despite its negative reputation due to unsuccessful investments in the 1990s, understanding the threats to KM implementation remains crucial While this research does not focus on microblogs as KM systems, their relevance for future studies and development is noteworthy Most existing research concentrates on user motivations at the intersection of user and system levels, highlighting a significant gap in usability research within the KM context.

KM system and limited studies on usage of KM system Both usability and usage studies if well designed can provide a good indicator of user acceptance of KM S

There is a notable scarcity of knowledge management (KM) evaluation studies at the group and team levels, with only a few focusing on virtual teams While some project-level studies can be seen as group-level evaluations, they often overlook essential group characteristics and team dynamics in relation to KM assessment This gap highlights a significant opportunity for future research on team effectiveness concerning KM Additionally, there is a lack of targeted studies on the evaluation of KM strategy and structure, both of which are crucial for the success of KM initiatives Future research could benefit from exploring the aggregation of evaluations from user and system levels to team, project, and business unit levels, ultimately leading to organization-level KM evaluation.

K Ganesh et al., Design and Development of Knowledge Management for Manufacturing:

Framework, Solution and Strategy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02892-7, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Achabal, D.D., Mchintyre, S.H., Smith, S.A., Kalyanam, K.: A decision support system for vendor managed inventory J Retail 76 (4), 430–454 (2000)

Alas, R.: Organizational changes and learning in production and services organization during a transition in society Int J Serv Oper Manag 4 (4), 481–497 (2008)

Alas, R., Vadi, M.: The impact of organizational culture on organizational learning and attitudes concerning change from an institutional perspective Int J Strateg Chang Manag 1 (1/2),

Alas, R., Vadi, M., Sun, W.: Connections between factors of readiness to change in Chinese orga- nizations Int J Chin Cult Manag 1 (2), 219–231 (2008)

Ambjorn, N., Miguel Angel, S., Miltiadis, D.L.: Learning processes and processing learning: from organizational needs to learning designs J Knowl Manag 12 (6), 5–14 (2008)

Andrew, R., Tom, B., John, C., Andreas, S.: Deep learning design for sustainable innovation within shifting learning landscapes, vol 6383, pp 578–583 Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York

Argote, L.: Refl ections on two views of managing learning and knowledge in organizations

Argote, L., McElvily, B., Reagans, R.: Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes Manag Sci 49 (4), 571–582 (2003)

Argyris, C.: On Organizational Learning Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York (1992) Argyris, C.: Reasons and Rationalizations: The Limits to Organizational Knowledge Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York (2004)

Armistead, C., Meakins, M.: A framework for practising knowledge management Long Range Plann 35 (1), 49–71 (2002)

Axsater, S.: A note on stock replenishment and shipment scheduling for vendor-managed inven- tory systems Manag Sci 47 (9), 1306–1310 (2001)

Baldridge, D C., Floyd, S W and Markóczy, L.: Are managers from Mars and academicians from venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance Strat Mgmt J 25, 1063–1074 doi: 10.1002/smj.406 (1997)

Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage J Manag 17 (1), 99–120 (1991)

Bate, S.: Strategies for Cultural Change Oxford Publications/Butterworth Heinemann, New York

Behling, O., Eckel, N.: Making sense out of intuition Acad Manag Exec 5 (1), 46–54 (1991)

Belcher, L.: Leveraging supply chain execution strategies Stores 81 (1), (2008)

Bititci, U.S.: Dynamics of performance measurement systems Int J Oper Manag 20 (6),

Bixler, C.: Codifi cation, personalization, and integration KMWorld 11 (3), 18–20 (2002)

Blatherwick, A.: Vendor-managed inventory: fashion fad or important supply chain strategy? Supply Chain Manag Int J 3 (1), 10–11 (1998)

Boisot, M.: Knowledge assets: securing competitive advantage in the information economy Oxford University Press, New York (1999)

Bontis, N., Crossan, M.M., Hulland, J.: Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and fl ows J Manag Stud 39 (4), 437–469 (2002)

Brandt, D.: Supply chain dream come true Ind Eng 41 (9), 52–53 (2009)

Brown, S., Squire, B., BlacKMon, K.: The contribution of manufacturing strategy involvement and alignment to world-class manufacturing performance Int J Oper Prod Manag 27 (3), 282–302

Bui, T.X., Sankaran, S., Sebastian, I.M.: A framework for measuring national e-readiness Int J Electron Bus 1 (1), 3–22 (2003)

Carbone, J.: Use your purchasing clout to get better customer service Purchasing 4 (1), 57–59

Carthy, I.M., Ridgway, K.: Cladistics: a taxonomy for manufacturing organizations Integr Manuf Syst 11 (1), 16–29 (2000)

Cavaleri, S.A.: Leveraging organizational learning for knowledge performance Learn Organ

Cetinkaya, S., Lee, C.Y.: Stock replenishment and shipment scheduling for vendor-managed inventory systems Manag Sci 46 (2), 217–231 (2000)

Chaouch, B.A.: Stock levels and delivery rates in vendor managed inventory programs Prod Oper Manag 10 (1), 31–44 (2001)

Chavan, M.: The balanced scorecard: a new challenge J Manag Dev 28 (5), 393–406 (2009)

Chen, M.F.: The joint impact of relationship-selling behaviors and switching barriers in profes- sional service contexts Int J Serv Oper Inform 4 (2), 123–145 (2009)

Chen, C.J., Huang, J.W.: How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management – the social interaction perspective Int J Inf Manag 27 (2), 104–118 (2007)

Chen, L., Mohamed, S.: Contribution of knowledge management activities to organizational busi- ness performance J Eng Des Technol 6 (3), 269–285 (2008)

Chen, T.Y., Chen, C.B., Peng, S.Y.: Firm operation performance analysis using data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard: a case study of a credit cooperative bank Int J Product Perform Manag 57 (7), 523–539 (2008)

Chen, S.H., Wang, H.H., Yang, K.J.: Establishment and application of performance measure indi- cators for universities TQM J 21 (3), 220–235 (2009)

Chia, A., Goh, M., Hum, S.H.: Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced score- card perspective Benchmark Int J 16 (5), 605–620 (2009)

Choi, B., Lee, H.: Knowledge management strategy and its link to knowledge creation process Expert Syst Appl 23 (3), 173–187 (2002)

Choi, I., Jung, J., Song, M.: A framework for the integration of knowledge management and busi- ness process management Int J Innov Learn 1 (4), 399–408 (2004)

Choo, A.S., Linderman, K., Schroeder, R.G.: Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management J Oper Manag 25 (4), 918–931 (2007a)

Choo, A.S., Linderman, K.W., Schroeder, R.G.: Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement project Manag Sci 53 (3), 437–451

Chopra, S., Meindl, P.: Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operations, 3rd edn Pearson International Edition, London (2007)

Chua, A.: Knowledge management system architecture a bridge between KM consultants and technology Int J Inf Manag 24 (1), 87–98 (2004)

Claassen, M., Weele, A., Raaij, E.: Performance outcomes and success factors of vendor managed inventory (VMI) Supply Chain Manag 13 (6), 406–414 (2008)

Cohen, S., Thiraios, D., Kandilorou, M.: Performance parameters interrelations from a balanced scorecard perspective: an analysis of Greek companies Manag Audit J 23 (5), 485–503