(Luận văn) compliance of local government units to ecological solid waste management act of 2000 the case of the municipality of luisiana, laguna philippines

THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY - - MYRA ROSE MENDOZA FLORES lu COMPLIANCE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS TO ECOLOGICAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT of 2000: THE CASE OF THE an MUNICIPALITY OF LUISIANA, LAGUNA PHILIPPINES va n BACHELOR THESIS PROPOSAL Study Mode Major Faculty Batch : Full-time : Environmental Science and Management : International Programs Office : 2013-2017 Thai Nguyen, 2017 i DOCUMENTATION PAGE WITH ABSTRACT Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry Degree Program Student name Student ID Thesis Title Supervisor (s) Bachelor of Environmental Science and Management Flores, Myra Rose M DTN145462049 COMPLIANCE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS TO ECOLOGICAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT of 2000: THE CASE OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF LUISIANA, LAGUNA PHILIPPINES Carmelita M Rebancos, Ph.D Do Thi Anh, Ph.D with Do Thi Lan, Ph D Abstract: lu With rapid increase of population and economic growth, the Republic of the Philippines is facing a major challenge for effective management of its growing municipal waste The government has enacted the Republic Act 9003 which is also called the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000, to overcome the challenges of waste management This study was conducted to determine the level of compliance to solid waste management of Luisiana, Laguna Philippines It is also described the current solid waste management practices of the municipality Key informants (Office of the City mayor, Secretariat of Municipal Environment Natural Resources Office, municipal environmental engineer, Solid Waste Management Board Vice Chairman, president of all barangay captains) and barangay captains are interviewed They were selected because of their direct involvement and participation in the implementation of the Solid Waste Management Program The residents to each barangay were conducted for the survey Data were analyzed by descriptivequalitative research method Results showed that the municipality has a high of compliance with the 62.5 % degree of compliance Level compliance assessment is based on the critical analysis as shown in Municipal Ecological Solid Waste Management Compliance Assessment With the high compliance, Local Government Units are still having difficulties on how residents will completely cooperate to the activities of Solid Waste Management Board Local Government Units their part for the beneficial of local community and environment municipality, but citizens of municipality are still deaf to response the environmental projects This paper also concludes that Local Government Units are not able to achieve the goals without the combination of technical and engineering expertise, and regulatory and enforcement powers with public education, awareness, and involvement campaigns to be able to properly implement solid waste and pollution control programs an va n Keywords: Number of pages: Date of Submission Signature of the Supervisor Solid waste management, Local Government Units, Republic Act 9003, compliance Fifty-nine (59) pages November 2017 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT At times, during my struggles, I don‟t deny that I regretted and think to stop on studying, because of some problems After all these challenges, here I am! Strong and fighting which only need a few more steps and perseverance to complete my bachelor degree My deep gratitude goes to our Almighty God for giving me strength, guidance, love, and joy I praise Him for abundantly supplying all my needs according to His riches in glory I would like to extend my appreciation to Dr Carmelita Rebancos for her ability in Solid Waste Management and lending me her time despite of her busy schedule And also to Dr Do Thi Lan together with her husband for giving me a chance to be my lu thesis adviser and giving comments and suggestions to my research paper an va I sincerely gave thanks to the Mayor of Luisiana, Laguna Philippines for allowing me n to conduct my research paper in town I also thank some staffs of the municipality for giving reliable information, additional knowledge and comments especially to Sir Christopher Raflores I am deeply indebted to the administrator and president of LAPRISADA, Ex V.M G Rodante Estrellado Without his encouragement, support specifically to financial, and advice, I would never have been able to pursue studying abroad and carry out what I have started I would like to thank the Advanced Education Program, Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry for bringing us experience, knowledge, and most of all, a new family I also gave thanks to the Laguna Private Schools Administrator‟s Association iii (LAPRISADA) for being part and giving such a great opportunity towards to my successful future I‟m grateful to be part of the K-45 class for having fun-loving classmates I couldn‟t have asked for a better group of people to spend for almost four years I also want to thank all my friends who helped me get through to finish my study Some friends like Pauline Damaso, Rosette Princess Dela Torre, and Rhonalyn Agupo, were tolerant enough to live with me for a few years Also, thanks to my close friends out there in the Philippines, whose untiring and generous supports in all my endeavors have cheered me on Most importantly, I would like to send my gratitude to my parents Ariel and Mila Rose lu Flores for all the moral support, understanding, and unconditional love that they gave an va to me To my brother and sister, Hazel Joy and Jan Mark, thank you for being my n inspiration and having there always on my side These people always helped me to keep my life in context Graduate school isn't the most important thing in life, but good friends, good times and happiness are “Don’t be pushed by problems Be led by your dreams” - Ralph Waldo Emmerson The Researcher Myra Rose M Flores iv TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures vii List of Tables viii List of Abbreviations ix PART I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Research Rationale 1.2 Research Objectives 1.3 Research Questions and Hypothesis 1.3.1 Research Questions 1.3.2 Research Hypothesis lu 1.4 Significance of the Study an 1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study va n 1.6 Definition of Terms PART II LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Related Literature 2.1.1 Compliance 2.1.2 Overview of Purposive Sampling 11 2.1.3 RA 9003 Law 13 2.3 Related Studies 19 PART III METHODOLOGY 22 3.1 Selection of the Study Area 22 3.2 Data Collection 22 3.3 Sampling method and Respondents 24 3.4 Research Instruments 24 v 3.5 Municipal ESWM Compliance Assessment 25 3.6 Data Analysis 31 PART IV MUNICIPAL PROFILE 32 4.1 History 32 4.2 Location 32 4.3 Population 34 4.4 Socio- economic features 36 4.5 Physical Characteristics 38 4.6 Waste Characterization Data 39 PART V RESULTS 40 PART VI DISCUSSION,CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 6.1 Discussion 53 lu an 6.2 Conclusion 55 va n 6.3 Recommendations 56 REFERENCES 59 APPENDICES vi List of Figures Figure Transportation Route to and from LUISIANA ……………… pp 33 Figure Luisiana, Laguna Terrain from Mountain Banahaw of Lucban, Quezon Philippines ……………………………… pp.33 Figure Municipal Map of Luisiana, Laguna Philippines …………… pp 34 Figure Pandan Weaving …………………………………………… pp 37 Bio-Waste Materials coming from the Municipal Public Figure Market are shredded at the Luisiana Environment pp 45 Management Complex – Composting Plant (LEMC – CP) … Figure MRFs of some barangay …………………………………… pp 45 lu Figure Brgy San Diego Open Dumpsite …………………………… pp 47 an va n vii List of Tables Table Types and Purpose of Purposive Sampling ………………… pp 11 Table Total Number of Surveyed Households …………………… pp 24 Table Leveling of Compliance …………………………………… pp 30 Table Population of Luisiana, Laguna Philippines ………………… pp 35 Table Percentages of Awareness, Knowledge, and Practices of Residents……………………………………………………… pp 50 Table Performances of Barangay to SWM ………………………… pp 51 Table Municipal ESWM Compliance Level Assessment ………… pp 52 lu an va n viii List of Abbreviations CP : Composting Plant DENR : Department of Environment and Natural Resources ECA : Ecological Compliance Audit IEC : Information, Education, Communication LEMC : Luisiana Environmental Management Complex LGU : Local Government Units MENRO : Municipal Environmental Natural Resources Offices MESWMP : Municipal Ecological Solid Waste Management : Materials Recovery Facility MSWM : Municipal Solid Waste Management MSWMB : Municipal Solid Waste Management Board MSWMP : Municipal Solid Waste Management Plan NSO : National Statistic Office NSWMC : National Solid Waste Management Commission SWMP : Solid Waste Management Plan SWM : Solid Waste Management RA : Republic Act DTI : Department of Trade and Industry DA : Department of Agriculture lu MRF an va n ix PART I: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background / Rationale A standout amongst the most imperative problems for most urban areas around the world is solid waste management Consistently, huge amounts of solid waste are disposed off at different landfill sites This waste originates from homes, offices, industries and different other agrarian related activities The waste does not restore and treated legitimately in the landfill destinations will create foul smell (Conserve Energy Future, 2017) Additionally, due to inappropriate waste disposal systems specifically by municipal waste management teams, wastes heap up and become a problem People clean their homes and places of work and litter their surroundings which can pollute lu an the encompassing air and can truly influence the health of humans, wildlife, and our va environment n Yet, given the fact that everybody is responsible for the waste that they generate, and that legitimate transfer of that waste is also the responsibility of the waste generator, program with respect to solid waste management is needed Sustainable solid waste management program is possible if there will be adequate political and citizen‟s participation will in the part of the Local Government Units (LGUs) The town of Luisiana, Laguna Philippines has been created the 10-year Solid Waste Management Plan by 2014 and has been approved of NSWMC by March 31, 2015 The project intends to showcase an environment-friendly waste management system which will benefit the local communities, and the over-all quality of the environment of the municipality, as well as, to comply with the existing environmental laws, in http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Economy&title=localgovernments-struggle-to-comply-with-solid-waste-managementlaw&id=123123 Census of Population (2015) "Region IV-A (Calabarzon)" Total Population by Province, City, Municipality and Barangay PSA Retrieved 20 June 2016 http://122.54.214.222/population/MunPop.asp?prov=LAG&province=Laguna Cooling G (2012) The Six Principles of Influence, Cialdini Concepts For Compliance Professionals Retrieved from: http://justaudiologystuff.com/the-six-principles-of-influence-cialdiniconcepts-for-compliance-professionals/ Conserve Energy Future (2017) What is Solid Waste Management? Retrieved from: lu http://www.conserve-energy- an waste-management.php future.com/sources-effects-methods-of-solid- va n Crossman A (2017) Understanding Purposive Sampling: An Overview of the Method and Its Applications Retrieved from: https://www.thoughtco.com/purposive-sampling-3026727 Dataman A , Amparado Jr R F , Aranico E , Torres M J., and Demayo CG (2012) Assessment of Solid Waste Management in the Islamic City of Marawi, Philippines Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269839285_Assessment_of_Solid_ Waste_Management_in_the_Islamic_City_of_Marawi_PhilippinesTolentino Del Siegle, Ph.D (n.d.) Purposive Sampling.- An Educational Research Basics by Del Siegle Retrieved from: http://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/purposive-sampling/ Delos Santos Ma C, (n.d) Local Government Unit‟s Environmental Governance for Economic Sustainability Retrieved from: 60 books.google.com Freedman, J L., & Fraser, S C., (n d) Compliance without Pressure: The foot-in-thedoor technique, JPSP, 1966, 4, 196-202 Retrieved from: http://faculty.babson.edu/krollag/org_site/soc_psych/freed_fras_foot.html Hatol LT T (n.d) Little Baguio of Laguna Retrived from: Wordpresshttps://thelittlebaguiooflaguna.wordpress.com/introduction/ Kojima and Michida (2011) Review of the Waste Management System in the Philippines: Iniatitives to Promote Waste Segregation and Recycling through Good Governance - Economic Integration and Recycling: An interim Report, Chosakenyu Hokokusho, Institute of Developing Economic pp 65-97 Landicho L.D., Wun‟Gaeo S., & Ikegami K (2010) “The Multidimensionality of Economy, Energy and Environmental Crises and their Implications for Rural lu Livelihoods” - ASIAN RURAL SOCIOLOGY IV -Volume 2, pp 37-44 an va Mercado E (2006) Making RA 9003 Work: Putting Real Issues, Real Solutions in n a Real WorldA Joint Policy Position Paper of the League of Cities of the Philippines andLeague of Municipalities of the Philippines(draft copy) R e t r i e v e d f r o m : https://vi.scribd.com/document/165940753/Making-RA-9003-Work-PuttingReal-Issues-Real-Solutions-in-a-Real-World-A-Joint-Policy-Position-Paper-ofthe-League-of-Cities-of-the-Philippines-and-L Navales R.G (2016) LGUS must comply with Waste Management Retrieved from: http://www.sunstar.com.ph/pampanga/local-news/2016/07/19/lgus-mustcomply-waste-management-law-486272 Nastasi B (n.d.) Qualitative Research: Sampling & Sample Size Consideration Patton, M Q (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 61 Sapuay G P (n.d.) Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 (RA 9003): A Major Step to Better Solid Waste Management in the Philippines [PDF file] Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237584037_Ecological_Solid_Wast e_Management_Act_of_2000_RA_9003_A_Major_Step_to_Better_Solid_Wast e_Management_in_the_Philippines Synthx R (2013) Philippine Solid Waste Management Retrieved from: https://vi.scribd.com/document/132576947/Philippine-Solid-WasteManagement Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C (Eds.) (2003a) Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Torres E O (n d.) Solid Waste Management in the Philippines Retrieved from lu va Management an https://vi.scribd.com/document/160864347/Philippine-Solid-Waste- n Vitharana, A D (n.d) Key Reasearch Findings and Recommendations Retrieved from: https://swm4sd.wordpress.com/the-implication-of-the-key-research-findingsand-recommendations/ Vivek A (2016), Techniques of Compliance in Negotiations Retrieved from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/techniques-compliance-negotiations-ananthvivek Word Press, (2007) Managing Solid Waste in the Philippines: The Dirty Business Retrieved from: https://thinkgreen.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/hello-world/ Secondary Information Resources - Republic Act of 9003 ( Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000) 10 Year Solid Waste Management Plan Luisiana, Laguna Philippines, 2014 62 APPENDIX Interview Guide Questions for Residents lu Have you ever heard about solid waste management? If yes to question 1, in what way? (One or more answer) - Over radio - Over TV - in public meeting - on poster - other If the municipality has a plan for solid waste management, would you be willing to participate and give a way to help with it? If yes to question 3, what help would you contribute? Do you know if there is a solid waste management plans your municipality? If yes to question 5, you follow the plan as a resident? If no to question 5, you still manage properly the waste you produced? How you value the importance of solid waste management? Do the barangay have a proper disposal sites? 10 If yes to question 9, you throw the waste in the said disposal sites? 11 If no to question 9, why the barangay don‟t have disposal sites? - No fund - Not doing - Don‟t know 12 Have you ever been educated on proper waste disposal by the council? 13 Is there any solid waste management practices does the municipality perform? 14 If yes to question 13, would you tell what it is? - Collection - Disposal - Transportation - Recycling / composting / incineration land filling - Segregation of waste - Specify if other 15 Would you personally say that the solid waste is affecting natural environment? 16 Do you think the information you know regarding to solid waste management is enough? 17 Are you satisfied with the solid waste management plan of your municipality?? 18 What problems you think exist of failing solid waste management? an va n Interview Guide for Barangay Captain Do your residents know about the solid waste management plan of municipality? If yes, in what way? And, If no, why? Do the barangay have a proper disposal sites? Do the barangay have a material recovery facility? If yes to question 5, how you use it? And, if no, why? Do the barangay have workers or collectors to handle solid waste disposal? If yes to question 7, who educated the collectors to ensure that the solid wastes are handled properly? Do the barangay have enough funds for the collectors? 63 10 What is the schedule of loading wastes? 11 Do the collection of waste is regular? 12 What methods your residents use to dispose waste? 13 Do your residents receive any education concerning solid waste management? 11 If yes who educates the residents? 12 Do your residents know how to segregate waste? 13 Do you have containers for waste disposal in your community? 14 What problems you have in your community concerning waste management? Interview Guide for Municipal Council Preliminary Questions How the Municipal Solid Waste Management plan started? Why you created Solid Waste Management Plan Who supported to make Solid Waste Management Plan? Do you consider the RA 9003 while making the plan? Is there any involvement of a person in the plan? What is the involvement? What are the issues and concerned of developing Solid Waste Management Plan? Secondary Questions lu an What is the current condition of Solid Waste Management Plan of Municipality? Have the program been successful? If the answer is no, what could be the problems and if yes how? Do the roles of barangays comply with the solid waste management plan of municipality? How you inform the council regarding to solid waste management plan of municipality? Do you have any education programmes for the residents concerning solid waste management plan of municipality? If yes to question 7, what exactly you educate the public on? How appropriate are these methods? 10 What practices have you implement to the residents? 11 Who educates the residents? 12 Do the municipal have enough funds for any projects will be held? 13 What is current condition of planned sanitary landfill of municipality? 14 Do you conduct any evaluation of your education programmes on waste management during and after educating the residents? 15 What aspects of waste management you evaluate on? 16 What other educational programmes you have for empowering the public with information on solid waste management of municipality? 17 What are the issues and concerns encountered during the implementation of MSWM? va n 64 Appendix Municipal Ecological Solid Waste Management Compliance Assessment Summary Indicators Ratings Institutional Member Composition Incomplete Members not follow the duties Members the responsibilities of others Complete with followed duties Assistance to Barangays Without any cooperations between captains and officials Barangay captains not cooperate Officials not cooperate Assists well Multi-Purpose Cooperative Absence activities Undertaken activities, yet, captains is not collaborating Undertaken activities , but lack of encouragement encouraged and promoted projects for residents Existing plan, yet not submitted Plan submitted MSWMP approved Environment of Solid Waste Management System Local SWM Plan (10 yr plan) Still developing Waste Characterization Unable identify to lu Identified but not compromised an va recycling component shall evaluate industrial, commercial, residential, agricultural, governmental n 6.Recycling Programs Without methods any any Incomplete identified constituent materials recommended revisions to the building ordinances, materials is undergoing to contain storage space for separation of recyclable materials Complete and comprised the solid waste all requirements are present where SWMP meet the waste diversion specified Published inventory materials, but not demand cost Provide composting plans Plan published with an existing materials and demand for composts 7.Composting Programs Without methods Systematic collection and Transfer No waste collection Regular collection Aside for rating 2, it has collection points and wastes separated properly When present Waste Segregation at Source No segregation Practiced Practiced practiced 10 IEC Programs Absence of IEC programs IEC programs not yet implemented IEC programs are just partially effective 11 Special Waste Management Not including to SWMP Included in SWMP but not yet implemented Include in SWMP but not properly implemented Continuously implemented and monitored Include existing waste handling and precisely implemented 12 Incentives Absence incentives Present incentives Incentives is not receiving any grants of of are Provided grants the 65 Solid Waste Management Facilities 13 Storage / Processing facilities Few barangays only MRFs are well not designed Efficient and safe materials are not well developed Without any dumpsites Open and controlled dumpsites has an authority to closed Propped SLF is being constructed or not yet operating Facilities is not durable Facilities is durable but not using it allocate funds when necessary LGUs either has budget allocation for SWM or has other source of fund Present of all requirements MRF 14 Disposal Facilities 15 Composting Facilities a Sanitary Landfill b Open Dumpsite c Controlled Dumpsite Solid Waste Financing 16 Fund Establishment No established fund for SWM LGUs has again either allocation of income generating program or other sources an Degree of Compliance Management lu Total Score No composting programs All operation of SLF and open dumpsites are already rehabilitated Composting facilities is very useful va n 66 Appendix Summary Showing the Daily Quantity and Composition of Waste Generated from Residential Sources, Municipality of LUISIANA, CY 2014 Major Sources 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 Total Waste Generation (kgs/day) Waste Composition (kgs/day) Kg./day %tage Bio Recyclable Sando bags Thin films Residual with potential for diversion Metallic Composite PP foils 1,157.16 982.80 1,131.68 634.09 187.10 132.86 161.62 224.22 411.68 267.18 238.78 175.45 5,704.61 15.23% 12.93% 14.89% 8.34% 2.46% 1.75% 2.13% 2.95% 5.42% 3.52% 3.14% 2.31% 75.06% 733.69 623.14 717.53 402.04 118.63 84.24 102.47 142.17 261.03 169.40 151.40 111.24 3,616.97 63.40% 149.51 126.98 146.22 81.93 24.17 17.17 20.88 28.97 53.19 34.52 30.85 22.67 737.07 12.92% 3.31 2.81 3.24 1.82 0.54 0.38 0.46 0.64 1.18 0.77 0.68 0.50 16.33 0.29% 16.60 14.10 16.24 9.10 2.68 1.91 2.32 3.22 5.91 3.83 3.43 2.52 81.84 1.43% 4.44 3.77 4.34 2.43 0.72 0.51 0.62 0.86 1.58 1.02 0.92 0.67 21.88 0.38% 17.63 14.97 17.24 9.66 2.85 2.02 2.46 3.42 6.27 4.07 3.64 2.67 86.91 1.52% an va 3,179 2,700 3,109 1,742 514 365 444 616 1,131 734 656 482 15,672 PCG* kg /person / day lu For Disposal Total Residual Waste Special Others Sub Total 12.80 10.87 12.52 7.01 2.07 1.47 1.79 2.48 4.55 2.96 2.64 1.94 63.10 1.11% 27.56 23.40 26.95 15.10 4.46 3.16 3.85 5.34 9.80 6.36 5.69 4.18 135.85 2.38% 82.34 69.93 80.53 45.12 13.31 9.45 11.50 15.96 29.29 19.01 16.99 12.48 405.92 7.12% 179.49 152.44 175.54 98.35 29.02 20.61 25.07 34.78 63.86 41.44 37.04 27.21 884.86 15.51% 261.83 222.38 256.06 143.47 42.33 30.06 36.57 50.73 93.15 60.45 54.03 39.70 1,290.78 22.63% 12.13 10.30 11.86 6.65 1.96 1.39 1.69 2.35 4.31 2.80 2.50 1.84 59.79 1.05% n Residential Urban Brgys SAN ANTONIO SAN DIEGO SAN ISIDRO STO TOMAS ZONE I ZONE II ZONE III ZONE IV ZONE V 10 ZONE VI 11 ZONE VII 12 ZONE VIII Sub-Total % share Urban Rural Brgys DELA PAZ SAN BUENAVENTURA SAN JOSE SAN JUAN SAN LUIS SAN PABLO SAN PEDRO SAN RAFAEL SAN ROQUE 10 SAN SALVADOR 11 STO DOMINGO Sub-Total % Share Rural TOTAL % TOTAL Projected Population (2014) 533 2,078 0.316 0.316 168.43 656.65 2.22% 8.64% 112.46 438.45 24.16 94.20 0.48 1.88 2.42 9.42 0.65 2.52 2.57 10.00 1.86 7.26 4.51 17.60 12.49 48.69 17.34 67.61 29.83 116.29 1.98 7.71 540 305 256 219 164 193 497 661 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316 170.64 96.38 80.90 69.20 51.82 60.99 157.05 208.88 2.25% 1.27% 1.06% 0.91% 0.68% 0.80% 2.07% 2.75% 113.94 64.35 54.01 46.21 34.60 40.72 104.86 139.47 24.48 13.83 11.60 9.93 7.43 8.75 22.53 29.96 0.49 0.28 0.23 0.20 0.15 0.17 0.45 0.60 2.45 1.38 1.16 0.99 0.74 0.87 2.25 3.00 0.65 0.37 0.31 0.27 0.20 0.23 0.60 0.80 2.60 1.47 1.23 1.05 0.79 0.93 2.39 3.18 1.89 1.07 0.89 0.77 0.57 0.67 1.74 2.31 4.57 2.58 2.17 1.85 1.39 1.63 4.21 5.60 12.65 7.15 6.00 5.13 3.84 4.52 11.64 15.49 17.57 9.92 8.33 7.12 5.34 6.28 16.17 21.51 30.22 17.07 14.33 12.26 9.18 10.80 27.81 36.99 2.00 1.13 0.95 0.81 0.61 0.72 1.84 2.45 552 0.316 174.43 2.30% 116.47 25.02 0.50 2.50 0.67 2.66 1.93 4.68 12.93 17.96 30.89 2.05 1,265.55 66.77% 4,882.52 64.24% 271.89 14.34% 1,008.96 13.28% 5.43 0.29% 21.76 0.29% 27.19 1.43% 109.03 1.43% 7.27 0.38% 29.15 0.38% 28.88 1.52% 115.79 1.52% 20.97 1.11% 84.07 1.11% 50.80 2.68% 186.65 2.46% 140.54 7.41% 546.46 7.19% 195.14 10.30% 1,080.00 14.21% 335.68 17.71% 1,626.45 21.40% 22.25 1.17% 82.04 1.08% 5,998 1,895.37 24.94% 21,670 7,599.98 100.00% 67 Appendix Summary Showing the Quantity and Composition of Waste Generated from Non-Residential Sample Sources, Municipality of LUISIANA, CY 2014 Kgs./day Percentage Biodegradable Recyclable Residual Sando bags Thin films Composite 0.765 11.47 11.81% 8.31 1.49 0.00 0.44 1.077 51.08 52.58% 72.45% 28.68 13.00% 14.29 0.00% 0.27 0.314 6.59 6.78% 56.14% 3.18 27.98% 2.03 0.53% 0.14 3.680 22.08 22.72% 48.31% 10.68 30.86% 7.40 2.10% 0.13 91.21 93.89% 48.38% 50.85 33.54% 25.22 0.58% 0.54 2.46 2.53% 0.26 10.48% 0.26 1.35 54.93% 1.35 2.19% 0.15 6.80% 0.15 1.39% 100% for Disposal Total Residual Waste Special 1.01 0.66 1.67 0.00 1.96% 0.17 8.81% 6.81 5.74% 1.11 14.55% 7.91 0.00% 0.20 1.36% 0.34 0.33% 0.05 13.32% 1.31 2.17% 0.06 15.49% 1.37 0.38% 0.00 3.85% 0.69 5.17% 0.48 0.78% 0.14 19.85% 3.01 0.98% 0.96 20.84% 3.98 0.00% 0.02 0.51% 2.95 3.11% 2.63 2.17% 1.68 0.64% 0.59 13.65% 12.14 4.37% 2.79 18.02% 14.93 0.07% 0.21 0.06 2.54% 0.06 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.70 28.48% 0.70 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.76 31.03% 0.76 0.06 2.34% 0.06 0.82 33.37% 0.82 0.03 1.22% 0.03 0.04 1.64% 0.04 0.04 1.64% 0.04 0.02 1.08% 0.02 0.08 3.75% 0.08 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.03 1.17% 0.03 0.20 9.29% 0.20 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.20 9.29% 0.20 0.01 0.61% 0.01 0.53 0.06 0.04 0.19 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.03 0.50 0.00 39.44% 0.53 28.88 4.78% 0.06 0.63 2.78% 0.04 3.90 13.89% 0.19 3.16 13.33% 0.18 3.59 0.00% 0.00 1.68 0.00% 0.00 0.61 34.78% 0.47 13.57 1.89% 0.03 2.88 36.67% 0.50 16.44 0.00% 0.00 0.25 PP Metallic foils Others Sub Total 0.00 0.19 0.16 0.23 3.81% 1.33 0.00% 2.84 1.66% 1.50 1.37% 0.70 2.61% 0.52 5.55% 0.00 2.94% 0.25 7.95% 1.47 0.00% 0.11 6.64% 3.76 0.00 0.00% 0.00 1.78 83.29% 1.78 0.32 23.89% 0.32 51.58 lu 2.46 2.131 2.13 2.13 0.675 1.35 1.35 97.15 va 1.536 an Commercial · Food Establishments % share · General Stores % share · Public Market % share · Other Services % share Sub-total Institution · Pawnshop % share Sub-total Industrial Source · Mills % share Sub-total Agricultura l Sources · Agri/Farm Supply % share Sub-total TOTAL Waste Composition (kgs/day) n Major Sources Total Waste Generation (kgs/day) PCG* kgs/person/ day 68 Appendix Summary Showing the Daily Quantity and Composition of Waste Disposed for the HH & NHH Samples of LUISIANA, LAGUNA, CY 2014 Total Waste Generation (kgs/day) Waste Composition (kgs/day) Residual Major Sources Kgs./day Biodegradable Recyclable Sando bags Thin films Composite PP Metallic foils Others Sub Total for Disposal Total Residual Waste Special TOTAL 5,704.61 1,895.37 7,599.98 74.11% 24.62% 98.74% 3,616.97 1,265.55 4,882.52 737.07 271.89 1,008.96 16.33 5.43 21.76 81.84 27.19 109.03 21.88 7.27 29.15 86.91 28.88 115.79 63.10 20.97 84.07 135.85 50.80 186.65 405.92 140.54 546.46 884.86 195.14 1,080.00 1,290.78 335.68 1,626.45 59.79 22.25 82.04 5,704.61 1,895.37 7,599.98 11.47 0.15% 8.31 1.49 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.19 0.16 0.23 1.01 0.66 1.67 0.00 11.47 51.08 6.59 22.08 91.21 0.66% 0.09% 0.29% 1.19% 28.68 3.18 10.68 50.85 14.29 2.03 7.40 25.22 0.27 0.14 0.13 0.54 1.33 0.52 1.47 3.76 2.84 0.00 0.11 2.95 1.50 0.25 0.69 2.63 0.70 0.34 0.48 1.68 0.17 0.05 0.14 0.59 6.81 1.31 3.01 12.14 1.11 0.06 0.96 2.79 7.91 1.37 3.98 14.93 0.20 0.00 0.02 0.21 51.08 6.59 22.08 91.21 2.46 2.46 0.03% 0.03% 0.26 0.26 1.35 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.06 0.06 0.82 0.82 0.03 0.03 2.46 2.46 2.13 2.13 0.03% 0.03% 0.15 0.15 1.78 1.78 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.01 2.13 2.13 1.35 1.35 7,697.13 0.02% 0.02% 100.00% 0.32 0.32 4,934.10 64.10% 0.53 0.53 1,037.84 13.48% 0.06 0.06 22.40 0.29% 0.04 0.04 112.93 1.47% 0.19 0.19 32.31 0.42% 0.18 0.18 119.38 1.55% 0.00 0.00 85.75 1.11% 0.00 0.00 187.26 2.43% 0.47 0.47 560.02 7.28% 0.03 0.03 1,082.87 14.07% 0.50 0.50 1,642.90 21.34% 0.00 0.00 82.30 1.07% 1.35 1.35 7,697.13 100.00% lu an va n Residential · Urban · Rural Sub-total Commercial · Food Establishments · General Stores · Public Market · Other Services Sub-total Institution · Pawnshop Sub-total Industrial Source · Mills Sub-total Agricultural Sources · Agri/Farm Supply Sub-total TOTAL % of Total Percentage 69 APPENDIX lu an va n 70 APPENDIX lu an va n APPENDIX 71 lu an va n 72 lu an va n 73 APPENDIX Some of the interviewed key informant persons lu an va n 74