Asme nog 1 2015 (american society of mechanical engineers)

ASME NOG-1–2015 (Revision of ASME NOG-1–2010) Rules for Construction of Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running Bridge, Multiple Girder) A N A M E R I C A N N AT I O N A L STA N DA R D ASME NOG-1–2015 (Revision of ASME NOG-1–2010) Rules for Construction of Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running Bridge, Multiple Girder) A N A M E R I C A N N AT I O N A L S TA N D A R D Two Park Avenue • New York, NY • 10016 USA Date of Issuance: February 20, 2015 The next edition of this Standard is scheduled for publication in 2020 ASME issues written replies to inquiries concerning interpretations of technical aspects of this Standard Interpretations are published on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages at http://cstools.asme.org/ as they are issued Errata to codes and standards may be posted on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages to provide corrections to incorrectly published items, or to correct typographical or grammatical errors in codes and standards Such errata shall be used on the date posted The Committee Pages can be found at http://cstools.asme.org/ There is an option available to automatically receive an e-mail notification when errata are posted to a particular code or standard This option can be found on the appropriate Committee Page after selecting “Errata” in the “Publication Information” section ASME is the registered trademark of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers This code or standard was developed under procedures accredited as meeting the criteria for American National Standards The Standards Committee that approved the code or standard was balanced to assure that individuals from competent and concerned interests have had an opportunity to participate The proposed code or standard was made available for public review and comment that provides an opportunity for additional public input from industry, academia, regulatory agencies, and the public-at-large ASME does not “approve,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity ASME does not take any position with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any items mentioned in this document, and does not undertake to insure anyone utilizing a standard against liability for infringement of any applicable letters patent, nor assumes any such liability Users of a code or standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely their own responsibility Participation by federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be interpreted as government or industry endorsement of this code or standard ASME accepts responsibility for only those interpretations of this document issued in accordance with the established ASME procedures and policies, which precludes the issuance of interpretations by individuals No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990 Copyright © 2015 by THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS All rights reserved Printed in U.S.A CONTENTS Foreword Committee Roster Preparation of Technical Inquiries to the Committee on Cranes for Nuclear Facilities Summary of Changes vi vii viii ix Section 1000 1100 Introduction General 1 Section 2000 2100 Quality Assurance Requirements 11 11 Section 3000 3100 3200 Coatings and Finishes Coating Service Levels Specific Requirements for Coating Service Levels 12 12 12 Section 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 Requirements for Structural Components General Materials and Connections Design Criteria Component Design 14 14 24 30 35 Section 5000 5100 5200 5300 5400 5500 Mechanical General Materials Design and Performance Criteria Component Design Miscellaneous 39 39 42 42 44 81 Section 6000 6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 Electrical Components General Wiring Materials and Methods (Types I, II, and III Cranes) Performance Specifications (Types I, II, and III Cranes) Component Selection (Types I, II, and III Cranes) Electrical Equipment Testing Requirements (Types I, II, and III Cranes) 83 83 84 85 86 100 Section 7000 7100 7200 7300 7400 7500 7600 Inspection and Testing Tests and Acceptance Criteria Manufacturing Receipt and Storage Requirements for Storage Facility and/or Site Site Qualification for Permanent Plant Service Documentation 101 101 102 107 108 111 113 Section 8000 8100 Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling General 114 114 Section 9000 9100 9200 9300 9400 9500 9600 Planned Engineered Lifts General Capacity Limitations Lift Frequency Limitations Inspection Frequency Planned Engineered Lifts for Bridge or Gantry Only Planned Engineered Lifts for Hoist and Trolley Only 115 115 115 115 115 115 116 iii 9700 9800 9900 Figures 4153.3-1 4153.3-2 4153.3-3 4153.3-4 4160-1 5411.5-1 5413.1-1 5416.1-1 5416.1-2 5416.1-3 5420-1 5420-2 5426.1-1 5426.1-2 5427.1-1 5427.1-2 5430-1 5440-1 5440-2 5452.4-1 5459.3-1 5459.3-2 5474-1 5474-2 5474-3 5477-1 5477-2 5477-3 5477-4 5477-5 6472.2-1 6472.2-2 6473-1 7521.2-1 Tables 4153.6-1 4153.6-2 4211-1 4212-1 4221-1 4221-2 4222-1 4232-1 4251.5-1 4311-1 Required Interlocks or Stops Load Testing Requirements Crane Wheel Loads 116 116 116 Typical Four-Wheel Trolley Model for Seismic Analysis Typical Four-Wheel Overhead Crane Model for Seismic Analysis Typical Four-Wheel Gantry Crane Model for Seismic Analysis Typical Four-Wheel Semi-Gantry Crane Model for Seismic Analysis Runway Rail Alignment Tolerance Drum Shell Design Allowable Yield Stress, say Typical Hoist Machinery Arrangement With Emergency Brake Typical Hoist Machinery Arrangement With Redundant Gear Reducers and Brakes Typical Redundant-Hoist Machinery Arrangement Single-Failure-Proof Reeving Example Single and Double Reeving Drum Fleet Angle Sheave Fleet Angle Proportions for 24:1 Sheave-to-Rope Ratio Proportions for 30:1 Sheave-to-Rope Ratio Arrangement of Crane Trolley Drives Arrangement of Crane Bridge Drives Arrangement of Polar Cranes Minimum Flange Widths and Heights Power or Control Circuit Limit Switch With Geared Upper Limit Switch Power or Control Circuit Limit Switch Allowable Bending Stress Allowable Tension or Compression Stress Allowable Shear Stress Typical Hook Cross-Section Fish Hook Configuration Equivalent Section Sister Hook Without a Pinhole Sister Hook With a Pinhole Ka Factors for AC and Adjustable Voltage DC Motors (Without Field Weakening) Typical Polar Crane Typical Characteristic Curves for AC Wound Rotor Motors (Examples for 0.75 per Unit Horsepower and 20% Total Resistance) Inspection for Wheel Wear 18 18 19 19 25 46 48 52 Boundary Conditions: Trolley Wheels to Trolley Rails Boundary Conditions: Bridge Wheels to Crane Runway Rails Acceptable Materials and Reference Properties for Structural Components Required Cv Energy Values for Structural Materials (Except Bolting) Acceptable Fastener Materials for Structural Connections for Types I and II Cranes Fastener Materials That May Be Galvanized Cv Energy Values for Fastener Materials Test Temperature for Filler Metal — Charpy V-Notch Impact Tests With 20 ft-lb Average Energy Exemptions to Mandatory Postweld Heat Treatment Maximum Allowable Stresses in Structural Steel Members iv 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 63 64 68 73 73 75 76 77 78 78 79 80 80 95 96 99 112 21 21 26 27 27 28 28 28 29 31 4315-1 4332.1-1 5331.1-1 5332.1-1 5333.1-1 5413.1-1 5413.1-2 5415.1-1 5452.3-1 5452.3-2 5452.4-1 5453.1-1 5454.1-1 6472.2-1 6472.2-2 6472.2-3 6472.3-1 7210-1 7210-2 8100-1 Allowable Stresses for Bolts Other Than ASTM A325 or ASTM A490 Value of the Buckling Coefficients, K␴ and K␶, for Plates Supported at Their Four Edges Rated Load Recommended Hoist Speeds Rated Load Recommended Trolley Speeds Rated Load Recommended Bridge Speeds Gearing Allowable Stresses Load Distribution R Factors Load Combinations — Hoist Drive Shafting Allowable Wheel Loads for Rim-Toughened Crane Wheels, P, lb, for Speed Factor p Speed Factor for Determining Allowable Maximum Wheel Load Guide for Wheel Flange Width and Height Load Combinations — Bridge and Trolley Axles Deflections Overall Friction Factors (Antifriction Bearings) Suggested Acceleration Rates for AC or AV Travel Drives Suggested Maximum Acceleration Rates Duty Classes Required Inspections or Tests — Type I Required Inspections or Tests — Type II Applicable Requirements of ASME NQA-1, Part II, Subpart 2.2, With Modifications of 8000 Mandatory Appendices I Additional Requirements II Criteria Required for Structural Qualification of an Existing Crane Bridge for Use With an ASME NOG-1 Type I Hoist and Trolley Nonmandatory A B C Appendices Recommended Practices Commentary NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix v 31 34 43 44 44 49 49 51 67 67 69 69 69 93 94 94 97 103 106 114 117 120 125 130 136 FOREWORD The Committee on Cranes for Nuclear Power Plants was first established in 1976 In 1980, the name and scope of the Committee were revised from the Committee on Cranes for Nuclear Power Plants to the Committee on Cranes for Nuclear Facilities This Standard was developed under procedures accredited as meeting the criteria for American National Standards The Standards committee that approved the Standard was balanced to ensure that individuals from competent and concerned interests have had an opportunity to participate This Standard or portions thereof can be applied to cranes at facilities other than nuclear, where enhanced crane safety may be required, and can be provided by means of either single-failureproof features or a seismic design Suggestions for improvement as gained in the use of this Standard are welcome They should be sent to the Secretary, ASME Committee on Cranes for Nuclear Facilities, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990 The first edition of NOG-1 was approved in 1983, the second in 1989, the third in 1995, the fourth in 1998, the fifth in 2002, and the sixth in 2004 This 2014 edition contains the revisions made since the 2010 edition; most significant of these is the addition of Mandatory Appendix II on criteria required for structural qualification of an existing crane bridge for use with an ASME NOG-1 Type I hoist and trolley Mandatory Appendix II parallels the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s guidance for modification of existing cranes for compliance with NUREG-0554, as presented in NUREG-0612 Nonmandatory Appendix C ASME NOG-1–2015 received ANSI approval on January 8, 2015 vi ASME COMMITTEE ON CRANES FOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES (The following is the roster of the Committee at the time of approval of this Standard.) STANDARDS COMMITTEE OFFICERS A S Kureck, Chair S Parkhurst, Vice Chair G M Ray, Vice Chair L Powers, Secretary STANDARDS COMMITTEE PERSONNEL S M Lawrence, Konecranes Nuclear Equipment & Services, LLC J D Edmundson, Alternate, Konecranes Nuclear Equipment & Services, LLC R C Lindberg, Sargent & Lundy, LLC B P Lytle, NASA Kennedy Space Center S Parkhurst, Material Handling Equipment, Inc D L Borska, Alternate, Material Handling Equipment, Inc R J Parler, AREVA L Powers, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers G M Ray, Tennessee Valley Authority B B Bacon, Alternate, Tennessee Valley Authority J Schulz, Westinghouse S Henderson, Alternate, Westinghouse N E Skogland, Eureka Engineering, LLC G A Townes, Be, Inc T V Vine, GDF Suez J L Weamer, Bechtel National, Inc T A Wetzel, American Crane and Equipment Corp B K Barber, Navy Crane Center S W Butler, Kennecott Utah Copper T Finnegan, Lockheed Martin Space Systems A Reisner, Alternate, Lockheed Martin Space Systems M B Fitzsimmons, Constellation Energy Group J N Fowler, DP Engineering Ltd Co L C Fraser, Newport News Shipbuilding W A Horwath, Whiting Corp D Weber, Alternate, Whiting Corp S Huffard, URS Corp S R Jones, U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission J Knight, Bechtel Marine Propulsion Corp J Konop, PaR Systems J B Kriner, Beckman & Associates A S Kureck, Magnetek Material Handling J A Wellnitz, Alternate, Magnetek Material Handling C Larouche, COH, Inc SUBCOMMITTEE ON OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR CRANES D E Klasel, Ace World Companies S McArdle, NEIL C A White, U.S Department of Energy G M Ray, Chair, Tennessee Valley Authority L S Gibbs, Southern Nuclear R D Hagler, Pacific Gas & Electric Co SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENGINEERING SUPPORT H Pratt, Crane Powerline Safety Organization S Raymond, COH, Inc D T Tang, U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission D Weber, Chair, Whiting Corp K Axelson, Zion J Griesemer, American Crane & Equipment Corp L D Jones, NASA Kennedy Space Center vii PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL INQUIRIES TO THE COMMITTEE ON CRANES FOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES INTRODUCTION The ASME Committee on Cranes for Nuclear Facilities (CNF) will consider written requests for interpretations and revisions to CNF Standards and develop new requirements if dictated by technological development The Committee’s activities in this regard are limited strictly to interpretations of the requirements or to the consideration of revisions to the present Standard on the basis of new data or technology As a matter of published policy, ASME does not “approve,” “certify,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity and, accordingly, inquiries requiring such consideration will be returned Moreover, ASME does not act as a consultant on specific engineering problems or on the general application or understanding of the Standard requirements If, based on the inquiry information submitted, it is the opinion of the Committee that the inquirer should seek assistance, the inquiry will be returned with the recommendation that such assistance be obtained All inquiries that not provide the information needed for the Committee’s full understanding will be returned INQUIRY FORMAT Inquiries shall be limited strictly to interpretations of the requirements or to the consideration of revisions to the present Standard on the basis of new data or technology Inquiries shall be submitted in the following format: (a) Scope The inquiry shall involve a single requirement or closely related requirements An inquiry letter concerning unrelated subjects will be returned (b) Background State the purpose of the inquiry, which would be either to obtain an interpretation of the Standard or to propose consideration of a revision to the present Standard Provide concisely the information needed for the Committee’s understanding of the inquiry, being sure to include reference to the applicable Standard, Edition, Requirements, Parts, Subparts, Appendices, paragraphs, figures, and tables If sketches are provided, they shall be limited to the scope of the inquiry (c) Inquiry Structure (1) Proposed Question(s) The inquiry shall be stated in a condensed and precise question format, omitting superfluous background information and, where appropriate, composed in such a way that “yes” or “no” (perhaps with provisos) would be an acceptable reply The inquiry statement should be technically and editorially correct (2) Proposed Reply(ies) State what it is believed that the Standard requires If, in the inquirer’s opinion, a revision to the Standard is needed, recommended wording shall be provided (d) Submittal The inquiry shall be submitted in typewritten form; however, legible, handwritten inquiries will be considered It shall include the name, mailing address, and telephone number of the inquirer and be mailed to the following address: Secretary ASME Committee on Cranes for Nuclear Facilities Nuclear Department Two Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 viii 6.3 Malfunction Protection 6.2 Driver Control Systems Summary of NUREG Guidance NOG-1 Paragraph No Means provided in the motor control circuits to sense and respond to such items as excessive electric current, excessive motor temperature, overspeed, overload, and overtravel Control system adaptable to include interlocks that will prevent trolley and bridge movements while spent fuel elements are being lifted free of a reactor vessel or storage rack The applicable standards referenced in NOG-1 address disconnecting means Constant potential DC (hoist) — dynamic braking, speed limited, overspeed protection, motor overtemperature Constant potential AC (hoist) — open and phase reverse protection, torque proving, temperature sensing Adjustable voltage DC (hoist) — speed limiting, torque proving, motor overtemperature, electrical braking, “pump back energy” resistor overtemperature Adjustable voltage AC (hoist) — to have same protection as a constant potential AC hoist AC variable frequency — protects against output phase loss, undervoltage, overvoltage, motor overtemperature, VFD overtemperature, controlled regenerative braking, 150% overload for 6413 6414 6415 6416 6417 Control systems are designed to handle all loading conditions, which includes inertia NOG-1 requires that inertia be included in the load combinations considered Method or Statement on NOG Conformance 6431.1 Control system(s) provided should 5310(a) include consideration of the hoisting (raising and lowering) of all loads including the rated load, and the 6310(a) effects of the inertia of the rotating hoisting machinery Control system provided should include consideration of the hoisting (raising and lowering) of all loads, including the rated load Drivers and Controls (Cont’d) NUREG Section No NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) Comments Yes Not applicable NOG-1 does not address the specific requirements associated with fuel handling equipment These are covered under other NRC guidance Yes Conforms (Yes/No) ASME NOG-1–2015 162 6.4 Slow Speed Drives Summary of NUREG Guidance 6440 NOG-1 Paragraph No 163 6330(d) 6340(d) NOG-1 drift point, when provided, shall be at the lowest speed point The owner is responsible for specifying functional requirements such as positioning precision, speed ranges, acceleration ranges, etc NOG-1 requires incremental drives or auxiliary system for precise positioning NOG-1 addresses allowable stresses in normal and emergency conditions 5321 If jogging or plugging is to be used, 5331.1(e) the control circuit should include features to prevent abrupt change in motion 1130 Hoist load limits and unbalanced load limits required 6445 NOG-1 addresses incremental drives Hoist overspeed limit switch required Hoist brakes (Types I, II, and III) — the brake system shall be capable of stopping and holding the load based on the credible critical load Increment drives for hoisting may be 5331.1(e) provided by stepless controls or inching motor drive Drift point in the electric power system for bridge or trolley movement should be provided only for the lowest speeds Conforms (Yes/No) Yes Yes Yes NOG-1 requires that the hoisting system Yes and crane withstand the kinetic energy of the most severe overloading conditions Remaining intact reeving shall not be loaded to more than 40% of the breaking strength of the wire rope, including dynamic effects of the load transfer Limit switches — overtravel (horizontal and vertical), overspeed, overload, drum overwrap Method or Statement on NOG Conformance 6444 Controls provided to absorb the 5423.1(c)(5) kinetic energy of the rotating machin- 5425.1(b)(3) ery and stop the hoisting movement reliably and safely through a combination of electrical power controls, mechanical braking systems, and torque controls if one rope or one of the dual reeving systems should fail, or if overloading or an overspeed con- 6422 dition should occur Drivers and Controls (Cont’d) 6.3 Malfunction Protection (Cont’d) NUREG Section No NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) NOG-1 does not address hoist plugging specifically However, current available control technology prevents abrupt changes in motion Comments ASME NOG-1–2015 164 6455 NOG-1 requires electrical interlocks for multi- Yes ple control stations and operation is only permitted at one station at a time Control devices shall comply with ASME B30.2 6451.1 Cranes that use more than one control station should be provided with electrical interlocks that permit only one control station to be operable at any one time If more than one control station is required, No but performance criteria for each are to be spec- justified ified 6310(b) Remote control for any of these motions should be identical to those on the bridge cab control panel Yes No but justified Yes Conforms (Yes/No) NOG-1 requires a manual means be provided to move the trolley and bridge when power is not available This means that there must also be a method for manual release of the bridge and trolley brakes Electrical interlocks are required for equipment with multiple control stations to permit operation from only one station at a time A device shall be furnished to open the power circuit to all crane drive motors This device shall be capable of being opened from all operator stations If more than one control station is required, criteria for each are to be specified NOG-1 requires the limits and safety devices listed in para 6441 that are separate from the operational control system, including (a) hoist overtravel (b) hoist overspeed (c) hoist overload (d) hoist drum rope mis-spooling (e) bridge and trolley overtravel limits Method or Statement on NOG Conformance Manual controls for hoisting and trol- 5131(c) ley movement may be provided on the trolley Manual controls for the bridge may be located on the bridge The complete operating control sys6310(b) tem and provisions for emergency controls for the overhead crane handling system should preferably be 6432.3 located in a cab on the bridge When additional operator stations are considered, they should have control systems similar to the main station 6455 6.6 Control Stations NOG-1 Paragraph No Safety devices such as limit-type 6441 switches provided for malfunction, inadvertent operator action, or failure should be in addition to and separate from the limiting means or control devices provided for operation Summary of NUREG Guidance 6.5 Safety Devices Drivers and Controls (Cont’d) NUREG Section No NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) NOG-1 requires the control station requirements be defined by the owner for the application Also, ASME B30.2 provides industry-recognized arrangements NOG-1 requires controls to be located within convenient access to the operator [Reference paras 6110(a), 6110(b), and 6432.3.] NOG-1 does not specify a preference to locate the operator controls in a cab on the bridge The location of the operator controls should be determined by the owner and manufacturer, based on the specific application Comments ASME NOG-1–2015 165 7.1 General Installation Instructions Summary of NUREG Guidance NOG-1 Paragraph No Installation and operating instructions are to be provided by the manufacturer 7600 7600 Installation and operating instructions, and acceptance test plans and procedures, are to be provided by the manufacturer Explanations of controls and operation are required for preoperational testing Paragraph 7420 requires no load (0%), full load (100%), and rated load (125%) tests prior to normal operational service Explanations of controls and operation are required for preoperational testing Installation instructions are to be provided by the manufacturer 7600 7420 Installation instructions, procedures, and inspections are required by para 7410 7410 A minimum of one hard-wired emergency stop is provided at an appropriate location that will remove supply power from the crane 6110(b) Instructions should cover the require- 7420 ments for installation, testing, and preparations for operation Include a full explanation of the crane handling system, its controls, and limitations for the system Installation instructions should be provided by the manufacturer NOG-1 requires provisions for emergency lowering of the critical load by an alternative means of operation of the holding brake NOG-1 requires a manual means be provided to move the trolley and bridge when power is not available This means there must also be a method for manual release of the bridge and trolley brakes Method or Statement on NOG Conformance 6422.1(c) In the design of control systems, pro- 5131(c) vision for and locations of devices for control during emergency conditions should be provided Drivers and Controls (Cont’d) 6.6 Control Stations (Cont’d) NUREG Section No NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) Yes Yes Yes Yes Conforms (Yes/No) Comments ASME NOG-1–2015 7.2 Construction and Operating Periods 166 Addresses qualifications of a crane for permanent plant use Addresses crane preoperational testing and inspections Addresses the checks and verifications required before and during installation Method or Statement on NOG Conformance During and after installation of the 7410 crane, the proper assembly of electrical and structural components should be verified The integrity of all 7420 control, operating, and safety systems should be verified as to satisfaction of installation and design 7500 requirements NOG-1 Paragraph No NOG-1 allows construction use of NOG-1 cranes as long as the crane is not used for a purpose for which it was not designed Authorization for construction must include (a) condition of use (b) maintenance requirements (c) inspection and test as required to maintain operability and quality during periods of temporary use of the crane (d) requirements for maintaining maintenance logs When temporary use is completed, conditions of temporary use are required to be evaluated Summary of NUREG Guidance If the permanent plant crane is to be 7430 used for construction and construction service is more severe than operating requirements, then the construction requirements should be defined separately Installation Instructions (Cont’d) NUREG Section No NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) Yes Yes Conforms (Yes/No) Comments ASME NOG-1–2015 Summary of NUREG Guidance 8.1 General NOG-1 Paragraph No 167 7413 Information concerning proof testing on components and subsystems performed at the manufacturer’s plant available for the checking 7270 and testing performed at the place of installation 7600 A-7613 A-7623.2 requires process and procedures at construction site to assure status of installation, inspection, examinations, or tests as being current, accurate, and complete on documentation, detailing the manufacturer’s testing documentation required to be prepared, and listing inspection and testing records to be submitted upon completion of the crane at time of shipment owner verification of manufacturer’s documentation prior to shipment Manufacturer documentation is addressed by the following: inspection prior to performance testing installation inspections 7415 7416 7520 receipt/storage inspection requirements 7300 preoperational testing and inspection manufacturer’s electrical verification requirements for no-load shop testing 7253 7420 manufacturer’s mechanical verification requirements for no-load shop testing manufacturer’s electrical inspection requirements during manufacturing NOG-1 specifies installation and testing requirements as follows: Method or Statement on NOG Conformance 7252 A complete check crane’s mechanical and electrical systems to verify the proper installation and to prepare the crane for testing 7240 Testing and Preventive Maintenance NUREG Section No NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) Yes Yes Conforms (Yes/No) Comments ASME NOG-1–2015 Summary of NUREG Guidance 8.3 Two-Block Test 8.2 Static and Dynamic Load Tests NOG-1 Paragraph No 168 Requires shop test to demonstrate the ability to withstand two-blocking For Type I cranes, manual lowering of the MCL is tested Testing at 100% of manufacturer’s rated load (which may exceed MCL), specifying that the crane be operated through all drives and speed ranges to test speed controls, travel limit switches, and locking and safety devices 7422 7422 Permanent plant service testing referencing para 7422 Testing at 125% of manufacturer’s rated load (which may exceed MCL), specifying travel limits to the extent that they are practical relative to physical restrictions existing at the final use site Permanent plant service testing referencing para 7423 Method or Statement on NOG Conformance 7530 When equipped with an energy7252(d) controlling device between load and head blocks, the complete hoisting machinery is allowed to two-block (load block limit and safety devices bypassed) Test, at slow speed and no load, to provide assurance of design, controls, and overload protective devices Demonstrate that the maximum torque developed by the driving system, including inertia of the rotating parts at the over-torque condition, will be absorbed or controlled Emergency manual lowering of the load and manual movement of the bridge and trolley should be tested with the MCL attached After making required adjustments resulting from 125% static load test, 100% MCL performance test for all speeds and motions for which designed All safety and limiting control devices will be verified The crane system should be static 7530 load tested at 125% of MCL including all positions generating maximum strain in the bridge and 7423 trolley structures and positions recommended by the designer and manufacturing Testing and Preventive Maintenance (Cont’d) NUREG Section No NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) Yes Yes Yes Yes Conforms (Yes/No) In the interest of safety, this testing follows the 100% rated load testing Comments ASME NOG-1–2015 Summary of NUREG Guidance NOG-1 Paragraph No 169 For Type I cranes, the maximum “critical Yes load” (MCL) shall be marked on the crane and hoist in lieu of the rated load markings, using the terminology MCL as part of the marking Maximum critical load (MCL) rating 1190(c) marking should be plainly marked on each side of the crane for each hoisting unit Margin of design above MCL is provided by Not applicable While NOG-1 addresses design facNOG-1 and documented in this matrix in sectors, NOG-1 is a design standard tion 2.2 and does not address operation and maintenance After installation, there is some degra- 5000 dation due to use and exposure 6000 With good maintenance programs, reductions in design factors of safety are not expected to exceed 15% of the design rated load Yes 8.5 Maintenance Preop testing and inspection requirements prescribed in NOG-1 address these requirements Comments Operational tests of crane systems should be performed to verify the proper functioning of limit switches and other safety devices, and the ability to perform as designed However, special arrangements may have to be made to test overload and overspeed sensing devices 7420 Conforms (Yes/No) Requires shop test or calculations to demon- Yes strate the ability to withstand load hang-up This two-block testing may be performed in lieu of securing load block to an anchor This is conservative because two-blocking forces on hoisting machinery are more severe than load hang-up forces Method or Statement on NOG Conformance 8.4 Operational Tests The complete hoisting machinery 7252(d) tested for ability to sustain a load hang-up condition load block attaching points are secure to a fixed anchor or an excessive load Crane manufacturer ensure proper functioning of protective overload devices Testing and Preventive Maintenance (Cont’d) 8.3 Two-Block Test (Cont’d) NUREG Section No NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) ASME NOG-1–2015 10 Quality Assurance Operating Manual NUREG Section No 170 2000 7000 NOG-1 addresses the recommendations of Yes NUREG-0554 related to design and manufacture of new components, but does not address maintenance or operational requirements that are owner responsibilities and are governed by other licensee commitments Yes The program should address all recommendations in this report NOG-1 requires a nuclear QA program for the design and construction of Type I cranes Though NOG-1 addresses the NUREG-0554 report recommendation to provide an operating manual, actual operation of the crane is outside the scope of NOG-1 NOG-1 requires the implementation of an Yes ASME NQA-1 QA program or a QA program specified by the owner that is required to meet 10CFR50 Appendix B for commercial nuclear power plants This is considered equivalent to the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.28 2000 7000 Applicable procurement documents 2000 should require the crane manufacturer to provide a quality assurance program consistent with the pertinent provisions of Regulatory Guide 1.28, to the extent necessary A quality assurance program should be established to include recommendations of this report for the design, fabrication, installation, testing, and operation for safe handling of critical load 4000 5000 6000 NOG-1 contains requirements for establish- Yes ing the maximum load rating for critical and noncritical loads Embedded in the design requirements are allowances for degradation of wear-susceptible components See section 2.2 of this matrix for a more-detailed evaluation Conforms (Yes/No) The designer should establish the MCL rating and the margin for degradation of wear-susceptible component parts Method or Statement on NOG Conformance Paragraph 7600 requires a manual conYes taining the information required by NUREG0554 and also requires additional documentation that exceeds the requirements of NUREG-0554 NOG-1 Paragraph No The crane designer and manufacturer 7600 should provide a manual for checking, testing, and operating the crane The manual should describe a preventive maintenance program based on test results and include such items as servicing, repair and replacement, visual examinations, NDE inspections, and problem diagnosis Summary of NUREG Guidance NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) Comments ASME NOG-1–2015 Summary of NUREG Guidance 10 Quality Assurance (Cont’d) The program should also include qualification requirements for crane operators NUREG Section No NOG-1 Paragraph No Method or Statement on NOG Conformance NUREG-0554/ASME NOG-1 Conformance Matrix (Cont’d) Comments Not applicable NOG-1 is a design standard and does not address qualification of crane operators, which is an owner responsibility, governed by other licensee commitments Conforms (Yes/No) ASME NOG-1–2015 171 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ASME Services ASME is committed to developing and delivering technical information At ASME’s Customer Care, we make every effort to answer your questions and expedite your orders Our representatives are ready to assist you in the following areas: ASME Press Codes & Standards Credit Card Orders IMechE Publications Meetings & Conferences Member Dues Status Member Services & Benefits Other ASME Programs Payment Inquiries Professional Development Short Courses Publications Public Information Self-Study Courses Shipping Information Subscriptions/Journals/Magazines Symposia Volumes Technical Papers How can you reach us? It’s easier than ever! There are four options for making inquiries* or placing orders Simply mail, phone, fax, or E-mail us and a Customer Care representative will handle your request Mail ASME 22 Law Drive, Box 2900 Fairfield, New Jersey 07007-2900 Call Toll Free US & Canada: 800-THE-ASME (800-843-2763) Mexico: 95-800-THE-ASME (95-800-843-2763) Universal: 973-882-1167 Fax—24 hours 973-882-1717 973-882-5155 E-Mail—24 hours customercare@asme.org * Customer Care staff are not permitted to answer inquiries about the technical content of this code or standard Information as to whether or not technical inquiries are issued to this code or standard is shown on the copyright page All technical inquiries must be submitted in writing to the staff secretary Additional procedures for inquiries may be listed within INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ASME NOG-1–2015 A11915