1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tất cả

Đề ôn thi thử môn hóa (147)

6 0 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

940 with photochemotherapy after heart transplantation Transplantation 1994;57(4) 563–8 46 Schneiderman J Extracorporeal photopheresis cel lular therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic graft ve[.]

940 with photochemotherapy after heart transplantation Transplantation 1994;57(4):563–8 46 Schneiderman J. Extracorporeal photopheresis: cellular therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2017;2017(1):639–44 47 Calore E, Marson P, Pillon M, Tumino M, Tison T, Mainardi C, et  al Treatment of acute graft-­ versus-­ host disease in childhood with extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis: the Padova experience Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2015;21(11):1963–72 48 Weitz M, Strahm B, Meerpohl JJ, Schmidt M, Bassler D.  Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in paediatric patients Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(12):Cd009898 49 Dunbar NM, Raval JS, Johnson A, Abikoff CM, Adamski J, Cooling LL, et  al Extracorporeal photopheresis practice patterns: an international survey by the ASFA ECP subcommittee J Clin Apher 2017;32(4):215–23 50 Lim HW, Edelson RL.  Photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1995;9(5):1117–26 51 Rangarajan HG, Punzalan RC, Camitta BM, Talano JA. The use of novel Therakos Cellex(R) for extracorporeal photopheresis in treatment of graft-versus-­ host disease in paediatric patients Br J Haematol 2013;163(3):357–64 52 Rutella S, Valentini CG, Ceccarelli S, Romano MT, Brescia LP, Milano GM, et al Extracorporeal photopheresis for paediatric patients experiencing graft-­ versus-­host disease (GVHD) Transfus Apher Sci 2014;50(3):340–8 53 DeSimone RA, Wontakal SN, Lyashchenko AK, Schwartz J. Acute mechanical hemolysis as a complication of extracorporeal photopheresis in a low-­ weight child J Clin Apher 2017;32(6):571–3 54 Julius U.  History of lipidology and lipoprotein apheresis Atheroscler Suppl 2017;30:1–8 55 Walzer S, Travers K, Rieder S, Erazo-Fischer E, Matusiewicz D. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) in Germany: an epidemiological survey ClinicoEco Outcomes Res 2013;5:189–92 56 Besseling J, Kindt I, Hof M, Kastelein JJ, Hutten BA, Hovingh GK.  Severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and risk for cardiovascular disease: a study of a cohort of 14,000 mutation carriers Atherosclerosis 2014;233(1):219–23 57 Wiegman A, de Groot E, Hutten BA, Rodenburg J, Gort J, Bakker HD, et  al Arterial intima-media thickness in children heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolaemia Lancet (London, England) 2004;363(9406):369–70 58 Taylan C, Schlune A, Meissner T, Azukaitis K, Udink Ten Cate FE, Weber LT. Disease control via intensified lipoprotein apheresis in three siblings C Taylan and S M Sutherland with familial hypercholesterolemia J Clin Lipidol 2016;10(6):1303–10 59 Seidah NG.  Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin (PCSK9) inhibitors in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and other pathologies Curr Pharm Des 2013;19(17):3161–72 60 Mollaki V, Progias P, Drogari E.  Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Greek children and their families: genotype-to-phenotype correlations and a reconsideration of LDLR mutation spectrum Atherosclerosis 2014;237(2):798–804 61 Freiburghaus C, Berntorp E, Ekman M, Gunnarsson M, Kjellberg BM, Nilsson IM.  Immunoadsorption for removal of inhibitors: update on treatments in Malmo-Lund between 1980 and 1995 Haemophilia 1998;4(1):16–20 62 Nilsson IM, Freiburghaus C.  Apheresis Adv Exp Med Biol 1995;386:175–84 63 Uehlinger J, Button GR, McCarthy J, Forster A, Watt R, Aledort LM.  Immunoadsorption for coagulation factor inhibitors Transfusion 1991;31(3):265–9 64 Bohmig GA, Regele H, Saemann MD, Exner M, Druml W, Kovarik J, et al Role of humoral immune reactions as target for antirejection therapy in recipients of a spousal-donor kidney graft Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35(4):667–73 65 Braun N, Kadar JG, Risler T. Therapeutic immunoadsorption its role in clinical practice Transfus Sci 1998;19(Suppl):65–9 66 Bygren P, Freiburghaus C, Lindholm T, Simonsen O, Thysell H, Wieslander J.  Goodpasture’s syndrome treated with staphylococcal protein a immunoadsorption Lancet (London, England) 1985;2(8467):1295–6 67 Esnault VL, Besnier D, Testa A, Coville P, Simon P, Subra JF, et al Effect of protein A immunoadsorption in nephrotic syndrome of various etiologies J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10(9):2014–7 68 Dantal J, Bigot E, Bogers W, Testa A, Kriaa F, Jacques Y, et al Effect of plasma protein adsorption on protein excretion in kidney-transplant recipients with recurrent nephrotic syndrome N Engl J Med 1994;330(1):7–14 69 Haas M, Bohmig GA, Leko-Mohr Z, Exner M, Regele H, Derfler K, et al Peri-operative immunoadsorption in sensitized renal transplant recipients Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17(8):1503–8 70 Hickstein H, Korten G, Bast R, Barz D, Nizze H, Schmidt R. Immunoadsorption of sensitized kidney transplant candidates immediately prior to surgery Clin Transpl 2002;16(2):97–101 71 Matic G, Bosch T, Ramlow W. Background and indications for protein A-based extracorporeal immunoadsorption Ther Apher 2001;5(5):394–403 72 Paglialonga F, Schmitt CP, Shroff R, Vondrak K, Aufricht C, Watson AR, et al Indications, technique, and outcome of therapeutic apheresis in European pediatric nephrology units Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30(1):103–11 48  Therapeutic Apheresis in Children 73 Moussi-Frances J, Sallee M, Jourde-Chiche N. Apheresis to treat systemic vasculitis Joint Bone Spine 2018;85(2):177–83 74 de Groot K, Harper L, Jayne DR, Flores Suarez LF, Gregorini G, Gross WL, et  al Pulse versus daily oral cyclophosphamide for induction of remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a randomized trial Ann Intern Med 2009;150(10):670–80 75 Stone JH, Merkel PA, Spiera R, Seo P, Langford CA, Hoffman GS, et al Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis N Engl J Med 2010;363(3):221–32 76 Jones RB, Tervaert JW, Hauser T, Luqmani R, Morgan MD, Peh CA, et al Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis N Engl J Med 2010;363(3):211–20 77 Hoffman GS, Kerr GS, Leavitt RY, Hallahan CW, Lebovics RS, Travis WD, et al Wegener granulomatosis: an analysis of 158 patients Ann Intern Med 1992;116(6):488–98 78 Jayne DR, Gaskin G, Rasmussen N, Abramowicz D, Ferrario F, Guillevin L, et  al Randomized trial of plasma exchange or high-dosage methylprednisolone as adjunctive therapy for severe renal vasculitis J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18(7):2180–8 79 Bolton WK.  Goodpasture’s syndrome Kidney Int 1996;50(5):1753–66 80 Klemmer PJ, Chalermskulrat W, Reif MS, Hogan SL, Henke DC, Falk RJ.  Plasmapheresis therapy for diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in patients with small-vessel vasculitis Am J Kidney Dis 2003;42(6):1149–53 81 Cigarran S, Castro MJ, Pousa M, Paredes S, Bernardo H, Porteiro M.  Plasmapheresis in diffuse alveolar hemorrhage as perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis relapse on hemodialysis Ther Apher Dial 2010;14(3):368–72 82 Brocklebank V, Wood KM, Kavanagh D. Thrombotic microangiopathy and the kidney Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018;13(2):300–17 83 Shatzel JJ, Taylor JA.  Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy Med Clin North Am 2017;101(2):395–415 84 Williams LA, Marques MB.  Pathology consultation on the diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) Am J Clin Pathol 2016;145(2):158–65 85 Schwartz J, Padmanabhan A, Aqui N, Balogun RA, Connelly-Smith L, Delaney M, et  al Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice-evidence-based approach from the writing Committee of the American Society for apheresis: the seventh special issue J Clin Apher 2016;31(3):149–62 86 Rock GA, Shumak KH, Buskard NA, Blanchette VS, Kelton JG, Nair RC, et  al Comparison of plasma exchange with plasma infusion in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura 941 Canadian Apheresis Study Group N Engl J Med 1991;325(6):393–7 87 Kremer Hovinga JA, Coppo P, Lammle B, Moake JL, Miyata T, Vanhoorelbeke K.  Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017;3:17020 88 Trachtman H.  HUS and TTP in children Pediatr Clin N Am 2013;60(6):1513–26 89 Loos S, Ahlenstiel T, Kranz B, Staude H, Pape L, Hartel C, et al An outbreak of Shiga toxin-­producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 hemolytic uremic syndrome in Germany: presentation and short-term outcome in children Clin Infect Dis 2012;55(6):753–9 90 Boyce TG, Swerdlow DL, Griffin PM. Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the hemolytic-uremic syndrome N Engl J Med 1995;333(6):364–8 91 Waters AM, Licht C aHUS caused by complement dysregulation: new therapies on the horizon Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) 2011;26(1):41–57 92 Walsh PR, Johnson S.  Treatment and management of children with haemolytic uraemic syndrome Arch Dis Child 2018;103(3):285–91 93 Nester CM, Brophy PD. Eculizumab in the treatment of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and other complement-mediated renal diseases Curr Opin Pediatr 2013;25(2):225–31 94 Sethna CB, Gipson DS. Treatment of FSGS in children Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2014;21(2):194–9 95 Trautmann A, Schnaidt S, Lipska-Zietkiewicz BS, Bodria M, Ozaltin F, Emma F, et  al Long-term outcome of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28(10):3055–65 96 Baum MA.  Outcomes after renal transplantation for FSGS in children Pediatr Transplant 2004;8(4):329–33 97 Kashgary A, Sontrop JM, Li L, Al-Jaishi AA, Habibullah ZN, Alsolaimani R, et  al The role of plasma exchange in treating post-transplant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 77 case-reports and case-series BMC Nephrol 2016;17(1):104 98 Verghese PS, Rheault MN, Jackson S, Matas AJ, Chinnakotla S, Chavers B.  The effect of peri-­ ­ transplant plasmapheresis in the prevention of recurrent FSGS.  Pediatr Transplant 2018;22(3):e13154 99 Weber S, Tonshoff B. Recurrence of focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis in children after renal transplantation: clinical and genetic aspects Transplantation 2005;80(1 Suppl):S128–34 100 Garcia CD, Bittencourt VB, Tumelero A, Antonello JS, Malheiros D, Garcia VD.  Plasmapheresis for recurrent posttransplant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Transplant Proc 2006;38(6):1904–5 101 Taylan C, Goebel H, Beck BB, Dotsch J, Nuesken KD, Hoppe B, et  al Quiz page December 2016: anuria on the second day following kidney transplantation Am J Kidney Dis 2016;68(6):A18–a21 942 102 Pradhan M, Petro J, Palmer J, Meyers K, Baluarte HJ.  Early use of plasmapheresis for recurrent post-transplant FSGS.  Pediatr Nephrol 2003;18(9):934–8 103 Gonzalez E, Ettenger R, Rianthavorn P, Tsai E, Malekzadeh M.  Preemptive plasmapheresis and recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in pediatric renal transplantation Pediatr Transplant 2011;15(5):495–501 104 Allard L, Kwon T, Krid S, Bacchetta J, Garnier A, Novo R, et  al Treatment by immunoadsorption for recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after paediatric kidney transplantation: a multicentre French cohort Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33(6):954–63 105 Jordan SC, Toyoda M, Kahwaji J, Vo AA.  Clinical aspects of intravenous immunoglobulin use in solid organ transplant recipients Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transplant Surg 2011;11(2):196–202 106 Chih S, Patel J.  Desensitization strategies in adult heart transplantation-will persistence pay off? J Heart Lung Transplant 2016;35(8):962–72 107 Mamode N, Marks SD.  Desensitization protocols for prospective pediatric renal transplant recipients Pediatr Nephrol 2016;31(10):1549–51 108 Asante-Korang A, Jacobs JP, Ringewald J, Carapellucci J, Rosenberg K, McKenna D, et  al Management of children undergoing cardiac transplantation with high panel reactive antibodies Cardiol Young 2011;21(Suppl 2):124–32 109 Chang DH, Kobashigawa JA. Desensitization strategies in the patient awaiting heart transplantation Curr Opin Cardiol 2017;32(3):301–7 110 Everly MJ. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibody monitoring and removal in solid organ transplant recipients Clin Transpl 2011:319–25 111 Requiao-Moura LR, de Sandes-Freitas TV, Marcelo-­ Gomes G, Rangel EB. Bortezomib in kidney transplant: current use and perspectives Curr Drug Metab 2017;18(12):1136–46 112 Snyder LD, Gray AL, Reynolds JM, Arepally GM, Bedoya A, Hartwig MG, et al Antibody desensitization therapy in highly sensitized lung transplant candidates Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transplant Surg 2014;14(4):849–56 113 Montgomery RA, Lonze BE, King KE, Kraus ES, Kucirka LM, Locke JE, et  al Desensitization in HLA-incompatible kidney recipients and survival N Engl J Med 2011;365(4):318–26 114 Vo AA, Lukovsky M, Toyoda M, Wang J, Reinsmoen NL, Lai CH, et  al Rituximab and intravenous immune globulin for desensitization during renal transplantation N Engl J Med 2008;359(3):242–51 115 Jordan SC, Choi J, Kahwaji J, Vo A.  Progress in desensitization of the highly HLA sensitized patient Transplant Proc 2016;48(3):802–5 116 Abu Jawdeh BG, Cuffy MC, Alloway RR, Shields AR, Woodle ES.  Desensitization in kidney trans- C Taylan and S M Sutherland plantation: review and future perspectives Clin Transpl 2014;28(4):494–507 117 Loupy A, Lefaucheur C.  Antibody-mediated rejection of solid-organ allografts N Engl J Med 2018;379(12):1150–60 118 Chehade H, Rotman S, Matter M, Girardin E, Aubert V, Pascual M. Eculizumab to treat antibody-­ mediated rejection in a 7-year-old kidney transplant recipient Pediatrics 2015;135(2):e551–5 119 Colvin MM, Cook JL, Chang P, Francis G, Hsu DT, Kiernan MS, et  al Antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplantation: emerging knowledge in diagnosis and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 2015;131(18):1608–39 120 Kulkarni HS, Bemiss BC, Hachem RR.  Antibody-­ mediated rejection in lung transplantation Curr Transplant Rep 2015;2(4):316–23 121 Pape L, Becker JU, Immenschuh S, Ahlenstiel T.  Acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30(3):417–24 122 Pearl MH, Nayak AB, Ettenger RB, Puliyanda D, Palma Diaz MF, Zhang Q, et  al Bortezomib may stabilize pediatric renal transplant recipients with antibody-mediated rejection Pediatric Nephrol 2016;31(8):1341–8 123 Taner T, Stegall MD, Heimbach JK.  Antibody-­ mediated rejection in liver transplantation: current controversies and future directions Liver Transpl 2014;20(5):514–27 124 Thrush PT, Pahl E, Naftel DC, Pruitt E, Everitt MD, Missler H, et  al A multi-institutional evaluation of antibody-mediated rejection utilizing the pediatric heart transplant study database: incidence, therapies and outcomes J Heart Lung Transplant 2016;35(12):1497–504 125 Twombley K, Thach L, Ribeiro A, Joseph C, Seikaly M.  Acute antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric kidney transplants: a single center experience Pediatr Transplant 2013;17(7):E149–55 126 Stegall MD, Dean PG, Gloor JM. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation Transplantation 2004;78(5):635–40 127 Morath C, Zeier M, Dohler B, Opelz G, Susal C. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation Front Immunol 2017;8:234 128 Song GW, Lee SG, Hwang S, Kim KH, Ahn CS, Moon DB, et  al ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation under the desensitization protocol with rituximab Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transplant Surg 2016;16(1):157–70 129 Warner PR, Nester TA.  ABO-incompatible solid-organ transplantation Am J Clin Pathol 2006;125(Suppl):S87–94 130 Tobian AA, Shirey RS, Montgomery RA, Cai W, Haas M, Ness PM, et  al ABO antibody titer and risk of antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-­ 48  Therapeutic Apheresis in Children incompatible renal transplantation Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transplant Surg 2010;10(5):1247–53 131 Saliba F, Ichai P, Azoulay D, Habbouchi H, Antonini T, Sebagh M, et  al Successful long-term outcome of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using antigen-specific immunoadsorption columns Ther Apher Dial 2010;14(1):116–23 132 Opelz G, Morath C, Susal C, Tran TH, Zeier M, Dohler B.  Three-year outcomes following 1420 ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplants performed after ABO antibody reduc- 943 tion: results from 101 centers Transplantation 2015;99(2):400–4 133 Lee EC, Kim SH, Park SJ.  Outcomes after liver transplantation in accordance with ABO compatibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis World J Gastroenterol 2017;23(35):6516–33 134 Mysore KR, Himes RW, Rana A, Teruya J, Desai MS, Srivaths PR, et al ABO-incompatible deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation: novel titer-­ based management protocol and outcomes Pediatr Transplant 2018;22(7):e13263 Evaluating and Preparing the Pediatric Dialysis Patient for Kidney Transplantation 49 Sandra Amaral and Lars Pape Introduction Historical Context The field of transplantation is fairly new in the context of medical history The first successful kidney transplant occurred in identical twin young adult brothers in December 1954 in Boston, Massachusetts in the United States The recipient died 8 years later of causes unrelated to the transplant [1] In the 1960s, the majority of children with end-stage renal failure died because no adequate treatments were available It was not until the mid-late 1960s that immunosuppressive treatments were developed to enable successful transplantation using either living or deceased donors and across immunological barriers In the mid-seventies, pediatric and adolescent hemodialysis and transplantation programs were set up in many industrialized countries, increasing the chances of survival for the first time for patients with end-stage renal failure At that time, approximately 120 children and adolescents with end-­stage renal failure underwent kidney transplant surgery each year per 100 million population With an incidence rate of S Amaral (*) The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: amarals@email.chop.edu L Pape University Hospital of Essen, Department of Pediatrics II, Essen, Northrhine-Westfalia, Germany approximately 120 new cases of end-stage renal failure per 100 million population, the number of children and adolescents on the transplant list has remained stable with approximately 6–8 children per one million children 18 months had an 89% higher risk of mortality (HR 1.89; 95% CI: 1.32–2.70) [3] Similarly, a large-scale study in Australia and New Zealand of 1634 children and adolescents starting renal replacement therapy before the age of 20 showed a four-fold (hemodialysis) to five-fold (peritoneal dialysis) increase in the mortality rate with dialysis therapy compared to successful renal transplantation [4] The benefits of renal transplantation versus dialysis therapy in terms of survival rates were outlined most impressively in a recent report of the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Compared to dialysis therapy, successful renal transplantation improved life expectancy in all age groups, with the most striking increase being noted in children and adolescents [2] In children aged 0–14  years, successful renal transplantation improved the remaining life expectancy post-­transplantation by 30 years; the average life expectancy for this age group is 50 years For adolescents between 15 and 19 years of age, life expectancy is improved by 25 years with a mean life expectancy of 40 years Therefore, kidney transplantation is clearly the treatment of choice for any form of childhood end-stage renal failure The complications associated with uremia and dialysis therapy can be avoided or at least reduced after prompt, successful renal transplantation [4] Moreover, quality of life is considerably better after a successful renal transplant compared to chronic dialysis treatment [5, 6] Patients can lead a virtually normal life, and apart from the need to take medication and attend outpatient clinics, there are only a few restrictions on everyday life Even growth and physical development are almost normal following successful transplantation [7] Transplant Referral: Timing and Indications Given the clear survival and health-related quality of life benefits to children with a kidney transplant versus chronic dialysis, prompt refer- S Amaral and L Pape ral for transplantation is essential for all children in advanced stages of kidney disease The purpose of the pediatric transplant evaluation is to identify any potentially modifiable surgical, medical, and psychosocial barriers that may adversely impact optimal patient and graft survival To this end, a robust, multi-disciplinary approach is essential to promote safe and effective transplantation for children and their families Typical components of the pediatric kidney transplant evaluation are presented in Table 49.1 The evaluation is by necessity comprehensive and can be time-consuming Preparations for kidney transplantation are usually initiated when the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) falls below 20–25  ml/min/1.73  m2 In the United States, children may be waitlisted for deceased donor kidney transplantation at any level of eGFR. This is in contrast to other countries, like those of the Eurotransplant group, or adults over 18 years of age in whom the eGFR must be ≤20  ml/min/1.73  m2 The absence of an eGFR cut-­off for waitlisting children in the United States reflects recognition that children with advanced stages of chronic kidney disease may experience substantially impaired growth and nutrition, impaired neurocognitive development, and other medical complications related to their kidney disorder before their eGFR reaches

Ngày đăng: 28/03/2023, 11:22

Xem thêm:

w