Investigating the cultivation effects of television advertisements and agricultural knowledge gaps on college students’ perceptions of modern dairy husbandry practices

Investigating the Cultivation Effects of Television Advertisements and Agricultural Knowledge Gaps on College Students’ Perceptions of Modern Dairy Husbandry Practices Thesis Presented in Partial Fulf[.]

Investigating the Cultivation Effects of Television Advertisements and Agricultural Knowledge Gaps on College Students’ Perceptions of Modern Dairy Husbandry Practices Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Annie Ruth Specht, B.S., B.A Graduate Program in Agricultural & Extension Education The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Emily B Rhoades, Advisor M Susie Whittington Copyrighted by Annie Ruth Specht 2010 Abstract The unrealistic images of American agricultural practices generated by commodity television advertising, coupled with a dearth of agricultural knowledge in modern society, may promote misunderstandings of modern agriculture based on cultivation and knowledge-gap theory This study investigated the possible effects of the “Happy Cows Come from California” television campaign on college students’ perceptions of dairy husbandry practices, compared affective responses to those advertisements to fact-based video content, and correlated these responses with agricultural awareness and television consumption habits No significant relationship between perceptions of dairy farm practices, awareness, and TV consumption was found, but participants reported a more positive response to the informational videos The researchers recommend a movement away from purely entertaining advertising content for agricultural products in favor of more realistic, fact-based promotions ii Dedication This work is dedicated to a proud farm family iii Acknowledgements The author would like to thank her advisor, Dr Emily Rhoades, and Dr Susie Whittington for their wisdom and support Thanks also go to the rest of her Buckeye family in the Department of Human & Community Resource Development They have been an instrumental and invaluable part of the research process iv Vita May 2004 ……………………… ………… Dover High School June 2008 ……………………………….… B.S Agriculture, B.A Humanities, Magna Cum Laude, The Ohio State University September 2009 to present ………………… Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Human & Community Resource Development, The Ohio State University August 2010 ……………………………… M.S Agriculture, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Agricultural & Extension Education, Agricultural Communication v Table of Contents Abstract ii Dedication iii Acknowledgements iv Vita v List of Tables vii List of Figures viii Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Review of the Literature 22 Chapter 3: Methodology 50 Chapter 4: Results 60 Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendations 81 References 96 Appendix A: Survey Instrument 112 Appendix B: IRB Materials 122 vi List of Tables Table A categorization of advertising uses and gratifications 46 Table Sample questionnaire items for uses and gratifications 54 Table Sample questionnaire items for advertising uses and gratifications 54 Table Percent of content viewed by platform 64 Table Uses of television viewership 64 Table Uses of advertising viewership 65 Table Descriptive statistics for “Happy Cows” 71 Table Descriptive statistics for farm-tour videos 73 Table T-test for differences in scale results 73 Table 10 Correlations between awareness and “Happy Cows” characteristics 77 Table 11 Correlations between awareness and farm-tour video characteristics 78 Table 12 Correlations between hometown and farm-tour video characteristics 78 Table 13 Correlations between TV viewership and “Happy Cows” characteristics 79 Table 14 Correlations between TV viewership and farm-tour video characteristics 79 Table 15 Correlations between advertising uses and “Happy Cows” characteristics 77 vii List of Figures Figure Frequency of respondent hometown types 61 Figure Frequency of respondent academic programs by college 62 Figure Respondent television viewing in hours per day 63 Figure Respondent agricultural knowledge 66 Figure Respondent agricultural awareness 67 Figure Respondent agricultural familiarity 67 Figure Importance of agriculture to respondents 68 Figure Frequency of respondent visits to farm or agricultural operation 69 Figure Frequency of respondent work on farm or agricultural operation 69 Figure 10 Frequency of respondent attendance at fair or agricultural event 70 Figure 11 Frequency of respondent interaction with agriculturalists 70 Figure 12 Respondents’ choice for most accurate portrayal of dairy practices 75 Figure 13 Respondents’ choice for portrayal of preferred dairy practices 75 viii Chapter 1: Introduction In November 2008, California voters overwhelmingly passed the “Standards for Confining Farm Animals” initiative, or Proposition (“Prop”) 2, a piece of legislation that restricts the use of animal husbandry tools such as veal and sow gestation crates and battery cages for hens (Goll, 2008) Prop was backed with financial and grassrootsmembership support from the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), an animalwelfare lobbying organization that had successfully instituted ballot initiatives in several other states (Birnbaum, 2007) Encouraged by HSUS’s media campaign, a majority of voters in California, which is the sixth-largest egg-producing state in the nation, passed the initiative despite warnings that “a potential ban on battery cages could be…disruptive to California's egg industry” (“HSUS lands,” 2008, p 35) Such a ban could cause egg prices to rise and thus increase outsourcing of poultry production to other states and countries such as Mexico, where food-quality standards are notoriously low (Schmit, 2008) The tactics utilized by agricultural organizations and commodity groups to raise concerns about food security and rising prices were no match for the images of injured chickens packed four-deep into small cages and veal calves struggling against short tethers collected by the Humane Society of the United States and disseminated across television screens and on the World Wide Web ... misunderstandings of modern agriculture based on cultivation and knowledge- gap theory This study investigated the possible effects of the “Happy Cows Come from California” television campaign on college. .. on college students’ perceptions of dairy husbandry practices, compared affective responses to those advertisements to fact-based video content, and correlated these responses with agricultural. .. with agricultural awareness and television consumption habits No significant relationship between perceptions of dairy farm practices, awareness, and TV consumption was found, but participants